reframing the debate: a revenue, not a spending, problem
DESCRIPTION
Reframing the Debate: A Revenue, Not a Spending, Problem. Dr. William Barclay Chicago Political Economy Group Testimony to Illinois Legislative Pension Committee Hearing July 8, 2013. Dr. William Barclay - Background. Worked 22 years at Chicago exchanges - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Dr. William BarclayChicago Political Economy Group
Testimony to Illinois Legislative Pension Committee HearingJuly 8, 2013
Worked 22 years at Chicago exchanges◦ MidAmerica Commodity Exchange, CBOT, CBOE and
Chicago Stock Exchange◦ Responsibilities included:
Product development Strategic planning Market research
◦ Worked with: Exchange staff Members (individual and institutions) Regulators: CFTC and SEC
◦ Occasional trader of derivative products Founding member Chicago Political Economy
Group (CPEG)
2Dr. William Barclay, CPEG 7/8/2013
Financial Transaction Financial Transaction TaxTax
What do Switzerland, Australia, Hong Kong and Singapore have in common?◦ They are all ranked in the top 5 countries on the
Heritage Foundation’s “Index of Economic Freedom.”◦ They also all have a financial transaction tax (FTT).
FTTs are, therefore:◦ Not an unusual tax.◦ Not a threat to successful financial markets.
Keynes, James Tobin and Larry Summers have all advocated FTTs – as did Pope Benedict XVI.
4Dr. William Barclay, CPEG 7/8/2013
Country Rate Products CoveredAustria 0.15% Stocks and bondsAustralia 0.3% and 0.6% Stocks and bondsBrazil 5.2% Short term forex
tradesIndia 0.25% and 0.02% Stocks, options and
futuresTaiwan 0.3%, 0.1%, 0.1% Stocks, bonds and
futures11 European countries (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, etc.)
0.1% - Jan 2014 Stocks and some derivatives
5Dr. William Barclay, CPEG 7/8/2013
HR1554 sponsored by Rep. Mary Flowers would impose a Financial Transactions Tax on buyers and sellers equal to:◦ 0.01% of the underlying or notional value of contracts
traded on the CME(including the CBOT) and the CBOE – 1 cent per $100 of underlying value 2012 notional value on the CME alone was $805 trillion.
◦ The tax would be imposed on stock, futures, swap, credit default swap, and options contracts.
◦ It would not include transactions involving securities held in retirement or mutual fund accounts.
◦ The rate proposed in HR 1554 (1 basis point) is much less than commonly found among markets with FTTs.
Assuming even a 50% decline in trading, it would raise $30 – 40 billion annually.
6Dr. William Barclay, CPEG 7/8/2013
An FTT on derivative contracts traded on Chicago derivative exchanges (CME* and CBOE)
Derivatives have both a buyer and a seller Both would pay the $1/contract FTT Even on the smallest contracts, this $1 is de minimus
when compared to the underlying or notional value of the contract ◦ E.g., Corn futures – roughly a $30,000 contract
A $1 FTT would be less than 0.0033% of contract value (1/3rd of a basis point)
◦ On larger contracts a dollar would represent even less, e.g., on the Eurodollar futures, a $1 fee on a $1,000,000 contract (0.00010% )
* CME owns the Chicago Board of Trade
7Dr. William Barclay, CPEG 7/8/2013
Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE):◦ Stock index options (on S&P 500, Dow, NASDAQ, etc);
Exclude options on individual stocks (size and competition) Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME)
◦ Stock index futures and futures options (S&P 500, Dow, NASDAQ, etc.)
◦ Futures and futures options on interest rates products (T-bonds, T-Notes, Eurodollars, etc.)
◦ Futures and futures options on currencies (Euro, UK pound, yen, etc.).
◦ Futures and futures options on commodities (corn, wheat, soybeans, hogs, cattle, etc.)
8Dr. William Barclay, CPEG 7/8/2013
$6.1
$4.6$5.2
9Dr. William Barclay, CPEG 7/8/2013
The most common one is: “The exchanges will move out of state.”
Another common one is: “Traders will take their business elsewhere.”
Yet another one is: “The tax could be easily evaded and/or costly to collect.”
Let’s consider each in turn by looking at the economic arithmetic of an FTT (the incentives involved).
10Dr. William Barclay, CPEG 7/8/2013
The relevant question: Have exchanges moved when FTTs were implemented?
No – this has not occurred. Why? The tax is not paid by the exchange. There
is no economic incentive for the exchange to move.◦ An FTT is levied on the act of trading.
The exchange simply functions as the collection agency for an FTT.
11Dr. William Barclay, CPEG 7/8/2013
Consider 3 very active futures contracts: Corn:
◦ Each contract is for 5000 bushels◦ Smallest price change (minimum tick) is $0.0025 =
$12.50 E-Mini S&P 500:
◦ Each contract is $50 x the index (about $81,000 today)◦ Minimum tick (smallest price change) is .25 index points
= $12.50 10 Year T-Note:
◦ Each contract of for $100,000 face value◦ Minimum tick is 1/64 of a point = $15.625
A $1/contract FTT is less than the minimum tick.
12Dr. William Barclay, CPEG 7/8/2013
Consider this economic arithmetic from the perspective of a trader (hedger, e.g., farmer, portfolio manager) or a speculator:
If the $1/contract FTT was levied, the trader would give up a fraction of the smallest first and last price change:◦ $1 of $6.25, $12.50 or $15.625 ($25 on the big S&P 500 Index futures)◦ What kind of trading strategy or trader is looking for price changes less
than the smallest amount a contract can change in value? Another way of thinking about this: The $1/contract
FTT is significantly less than the difference between the bid and ask prices for these contracts.
The economic incentive for a trader to move is very limited.
13Dr. William Barclay, CPEG 7/8/2013
The relevant question: To where would traders go?
Some products trade under exclusive licenses.◦ These include almost all stock index products.
Derivative exchange competition is not primarily product based. ◦ Very few identical products are listed on different
derivative exchanges. ◦ This may reflect 1980s/early 1990s competition in FX
and petroleum products. Consistent outcome: one exchange won all the volume.
It also reflects the problem of liquidity creation in derivatives trading.
14Dr. William Barclay, CPEG 7/8/2013
The argument that an FTT would be easy to evade/costly to administer also has little merit.
Clearing houses match and clear all trades (CME’s Clearing House and OCC for CBOE).
The CH already serves as a collection agency for transaction fees.
The CH could easily collect an FTT. Thus an FTT is very low cost to administer
and difficult to evade.
15Dr. William Barclay, CPEG 7/8/2013
The FFT is on the act of trading – like a sales tax for buying clothes, food, a car, etc.◦ It is on both buying and selling the derivative.
The FFT is a very progressive tax because of who trades and thus who would pay the tax :◦ Institutions such as banks, hedge funds, broker-
dealers◦ High-income individuals◦ Day traders
16Dr. William Barclay, CPEG 7/8/2013
What is good tax policy: ◦A good tax should be a small amount for
any single event. ◦A good tax should fall on those able to
bear the tax. ◦A good tax should tax activity that we
want to limit or discourage. Lord Adair Turner – much of what goes on
in finance is “socially useless” activity.◦A good tax should further economic or
social justice.17Dr. William Barclay, CPEG 7/8/2013
A $1/contract FTT meets the criteria for a good tax:◦ The FFT rate is very low compared to the value
of a contract. Total notional value of trading on the CME in 2012
was $806 trillion.◦ The FFT would fall primarily on high income
individuals and wealthy institutions.◦ The FFT would probably discourage some
“socially useless” short term trading.◦ An FFT taxes the sector that caused the
financial crisis that led to the Great Recession.
18Dr. William Barclay, CPEG 7/8/2013
“When the capital development of a country becomes a by-product of the activities of a casino, the job is likely to be ill-done.”
- John Maynard Keynes
19Dr. William Barclay, CPEG 7/8/2013
Raising Revenue from Those Who Can Afford It
Some claim Illinois is a high tax state. That depends on where your household falls in the
income continuum. Consider all major taxes: income, property and
sales taxes.◦ IL bottom quintile households pay taxes at the 2nd highest
rate in the US.◦ Middle income quintile households pay taxes at the 5th
highest rate in the US.◦ However, top 1% income households pay taxes at the
only the 30th highest rate in the US.◦ The next 4% of households by income pay taxes at only
the 15th highest rate in the US. A graduated income tax would help remedy this
unfair distribution of taxation.
21Dr. William Barclay, CPEG 7/8/2013
CTBA’s GIT proposal would:◦ Raise $2.4 - $3.4 revenue annually.◦ Cut overall state income tax burden for 94% of
all taxpayers. Taxpayers with under $150,000 in annual base
income would receive a tax cut. Effective rates would be 0% for incomes below
$9,000 and slowly increase to roughly 6%.◦ Keep the effective state income tax rate for
millionaires. ◦ Stimulate the growth of at least 36,000 jobs in
the state’s private sector through enhanced public and consumer spending.
22Dr. William Barclay, CPEG 7/8/2013
34 of the 41 states with individual income taxes have graduated rates.
Iowa’s GIT applied to Illinois would raise 42% more revenue than the roughly $15 B raised from Illinois’ current temporary 5% flat rate◦ It would still cut rates for most filers.
KY, MO, and WI all have GIT’s that raise 11% to 24 % more revenue and cut tax rates for most filers.
If Illinois had Oregon’s GIT, the state would almost double its IIT revenue.
23Dr. William Barclay, CPEG 7/8/2013
A Summary of Dr. Ron Baiman’s July 3, 2013, Testimony
CME’s tax reduction - $85 million Foreign dividend exclusion - $386 million Domestic production credit - $200 million
◦ IL would join 22 other states in decoupling On line hotel room purchases - $25 million Offshore oil drilling - $75 million
◦ Many other states tax the income share that can be apportioned to their state
Retailer’s discount - $109 million◦ Flows largely to out-of-state retail chains such as
WalMart TOTAL: $880 million/year in lost tax revenue
25Dr. William Barclay, CPEG 7/8/2013
Allocate the $880 million to a dedicated fund.
Use the same IDOR return and investment assumptions that underlie the $95 billion “pension shortfall.”
Use IDOR’s same 33 year period. Net present value of these 6 tax loopholes:
$70.5 billion
26Dr. William Barclay, CPEG 7/8/2013
Illinois has potential revenue sources. Illinois can enact legislation that would:
◦ Solve the “pension funding crisis.”◦ Not take away from teachers, state employees,
and others their earned benefits.◦ Pass constitutional scrutiny.
An FTT is a particularly attractive path. It is time to act.
27Dr. William Barclay, CPEG 7/8/2013
28Dr. William Barclay, CPEG 7/8/2013