reference tool for auditing competence · reference tool for auditing competence - version 2 /...

28
Global Social Compliance Programme Reference tool for Auding Competence Version 2 - October 2014

Upload: dangdieu

Post on 22-May-2018

233 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Global SocialCompliance Programme

Reference tool for Auditing Competence

Version 2 - October 2014

About the GSCPGlobal Social Compliance Programme

/ GSCP objectives and scopeThe Global Social Compliance Programme is a business-driven programme for the continuous improvement of working and environmental conditions in global supply chains. The GSCP was created by and for global buying companies (manufacturers and retailers) wanting to work collaboratively on improving the sustainability (social and environmental) of their often‐shared supply base. To this end, these companies seek to harmonise existing efforts to deliver a shared, global and sustainable approach.

The scope of the Programme encompasses:

• social and labour practices,

• site‐specific environmental practices (not product related).

The Programme can be applied at all levels of the supply chain.

The Programme is neither a monitoring initiative, nor a substitute to existing systems. The GSCP will not undertake accreditation or certification activities as it must remain a non‐aligned, neutral reference framework.

/ The GSCP Reference toolsTo drive convergence, the GSCP has developed a set of Reference tools and processes that provide a common interpretation, based on best existing practice, of fair labour/social and environmental requirements and their implementation in the supply chain.

/ Users & UsageThese tools are openly available for all to use. Users can include GSCP member and non‐member buying companies, suppliers and employment sites. Multi‐Stakeholder Initiatives and other initiatives, auditing bodies and other scheme owners can and are encouraged to also use the GSCP Reference tools.

The Reference tools can voluntarily either be:

• integrated by users into their respective systems; or

• utilised by users as a reference against which to compare their existing tools through the GSCP Equivalence Process1.

/ ResponsibilityThe GSCP does not monitor nor audit in any way the compliance by a user’s supply chain with the GSCP Reference tools or any standards.

The adoption of part or all of one or more Reference tools cannot be put forward as a proof of adequate due diligence. The responsibility of the implementation of these tools, of the monitoring of the user’s supply chain’s compliance and of any due diligence linked to it, resides with the user. Any use of the GSCP name or logo has to follow the terms established by the GSCP. These terms are available on the GSCP website (www.gscpnet.com).

1. The Equivalence Process is a mechanism by which a social and/or environmental compliance scheme is objectively benchmarked against the requirements defined in one or more GSCP Reference tools, to determine their level of equivalence. Through the Equivalence Process, the GSCP enables the comparison of various standards and schemes against the GSCP Reference tools, aiming at bringing convergence in requirements and approaches and building mutual recognition.

AcknowledgmentsThank you to those who contributed to this Reference tool

This Reference tool has been developed by supply chain experts from GSCP member companies, with input from key stakeholders, including other brands and retailers, initiatives and international organisations, auditing and certification bodies and civil society representatives. The GSCP would like to thank all those who have helped with the development and continuous improvement of this Reference tool.

The Consumer Goods ForumThe GSCP is housed by The Consumer Goods Forum, a retailer and manufacturer parity industry body, driven by its members2. It brings together retailers, manufacturers and suppliers to collaborate across the value chain to enrich shopper and consumer value in all markets. It supports processes and practices that optimise the value chain as an interrelated whole, in accordance with all anti‐trust laws.

2. For more information, please visit www.theconsumergoodsforum.com

GLOBAL SOCIAL COMPLIANCE PROGRAMME_01

Table of contents

Global SocialCompliance Programme

/ Introduction 02

/ 1. Core principles of auditing bodies 03

/ 2. Requirements of auditing bodies 04

2.1 Organisation and management 04

2.2 Competence of Personnel 06

2.3 Continuous professional development 07

2.4 Sub-Contracting 07

/ 3. Alerts and sensitive information 08

/ 4. Appeals 08

/ 5. Complaints 08

/ 6. Fraud prevention 09

/ 7. Support in the event of any external challenge 09

Appendix 1: Requirements for auditors and lead auditors 10

Table A 11

Table B 15

Table C 16

Table D 17

/ Glossary of terms - Auditor competence 18

/ Glossary of terms - General 22

02_GLOBAL SOCIAL COMPLIANCE PROGRAMME

REFERENCE TOOL FOR AUDITING COMPETENCE - VERSION 2 / OCTOBER 2014

ABOUT THE REFERENCE TOOL FOR AUDITING COMPETENCE

Scope:The Reference tool specifies the principles and requirements for the competence, consistency, relevancy and impartiality of any auditing body in charge of auditing against standards relating to:

• social compliance and

• environmental compliance.

The Reference tool also specifies the competence of the personnel involved directly with the auditing and assessment of supplying companies which has a significant bearing on:

• the outcome of an audit, and

• the consistency of the performance of the body in charge of auditing.

Competence requirements for auditors and lead auditors can be found as an annex to section 2.2 of this document.

Objective: The objective of this Reference tool for Auditing Competence is to establish the requirements that define a reliable and appropriate level of competence for organisations undertaking audits in relation to social compliance and environmental compliance. This Reference tool is intended to be used in connection with the other GSCP Reference tools, but can be also be used independently.

The requirements in this Reference tool can be either:

• integrated in the management systems of companies performing second party audits, or

• used by independent third party auditing bodies, and/or

• used by companies using independent third party auditing bodies to perform audits3.

They can also be used by companies, auditing bodies or initiatives as a reference against which to compare their existing requirements (see GSCP Equivalence Process).

In this document, auditing bodies refers to any person, legal entity or part of a legal entity that performs auditing services.

Auditing bodies thus include:

• companies/organisations;

• audit teams from buying/sourcing companies that are demonstrably independent of the company’s commercial functions, and

• industry or sector schemes and multi‐stakeholder initiatives.

This Reference tool will allow:

• the assessment of the capability and suitability of auditing bodies, and

• the creation of a harmonised framework to recognise external auditing bodies.

The implementation of the requirements contained in this document will provide greater assurance that auditing bodies are:

a) conforming to specified requirements;

b) capable of consistently achieving their objectives;

c) effectively complying with defined standards, systems and procedures;

d) providing consistent and effective personnel training and oversight.

3. A definition of first, second and third party audits can be found in the glossary of terms at the end of the document.

INTR

OD

UC

TIO

NCO

RE

PRIN

CIPL

ES

REQ

UIR

EMEN

TS

ALE

RTS

A

PPEA

LSCO

MPL

AIN

TS

FRA

UD

PR

EVEN

TIO

NEX

TER

NA

L CH

ALL

ENG

EA

PPEN

DIX

1

GLO

SSA

RY

– A

UD

ITO

R

COM

PETE

NCE

G

LOSS

AR

Y -

GEN

ERA

L

GLOBAL SOCIAL COMPLIANCE PROGRAMME_03

REFERENCE TOOL FOR AUDITING COMPETENCE - VERSION 2 / OCTOBER 2014

Requirements:In order to gain recognition by users of this tool, bodies in charge of auditing must meet and continue to meet all the requirements specified within this Reference tool.

The requirements cover:

1. core principles of auditing bodies;

2. requirements of auditing bodies ‐ organisation and mana-gement, competence of personnel, continuous professional development and sub‐contracting arrangements;

3. alerts and sensitive information;

4. appeals;

5. complaints against the auditor or auditing body;

6. fraud prevention;

7. support in the event of any external challenge.

INTR

OD

UC

TION

COR

E PRIN

CIPLES R

EQU

IREM

ENTS

ALER

TS A

PPEALS

COM

PLAIN

TS FR

AU

D PR

EVEN

TION

EXTER

NA

L CH

ALLEN

GE

APPEN

DIX 1

GLO

SSAR

Y – AU

DITO

R

COM

PETENCE

G

LOSSA

RY -

GEN

ERA

L

1. CORE PRINCIPLES OF AUDITING BODIES

The core principles upon which auditing bodies effectively operate are as follows:

• impartiality;

• competence;

• responsibility;

• openness;

• confidentiality;

• responsiveness to complaints;

• professional integrity;

• consistency;

• audit scope.

ImpartialityTo ensure confidence in the services it provides, the auditing body is impartial in its policy making and operation. With respect to the auditing body’s operation, the auditing body and its employees base their decisions and opinions on objective evidence. These decisions and opinions are not influenced by other interests, by any other party or prejudice.

Competence Competence of the personnel employed by the auditing body is of an adequate level in order to provide full confidence on the findings of an audit and any decision resulting from an audit [see Appendix 1 – Requirements for Auditors and Lead Auditors].

ResponsibilityThe auditing body has the responsibility to assess effectively and provide objective evidence upon which to base their findings and reports.

OpennessThe auditing body makes clear and unambiguous information publicly available about its governance structure and its operation.

The auditing body, in accordance with its confidentiality policy, agrees to the shadow auditing of its audit teams and the review of audit work documentation at the justifiable request of any other relevant organisation.

04_GLOBAL SOCIAL COMPLIANCE PROGRAMME

REFERENCE TOOL FOR AUDITING COMPETENCE - VERSION 2 / OCTOBER 2014

Confidentiality The auditing body has clearly defined confidentiality policies regarding the companies / sites they audit and the release of information to any other party.

Responsiveness to complaintsThe auditing body has effective and responsive procedures in place for dealing with complaints from any party.

Professional integrity The auditing body adheres to good governance, is honest and trustworthy and has measures in place to ensure their employees uphold these principles.

Consistency The auditing body ensures conformity in the application of its work, typically that which is necessary for the sake of logic, accuracy and fairness and has measures in place to provide its employees with the necessary training to apply it.

Audit ScopeThe scope of a social compliance and/or environment audit is ultimately determined by the client, and must effectively consider the related competence of auditing bodies and auditors.

• The audit scope is based on the issues that are defined by the code, standard or other requirements against which the audit is conducted.

• The audit scope is based on the competence of the audit bodies and auditors. Auditing bodies or auditors should not assess conditions beyond the substantive areas where they have competence.

• The audit scope is directed at the identification of conditions – including the underlying management processes that create conditions – based on recognised audit procedures including visual observation, interviews and review of documentation.

• While an effective audit does consider underlying management processes to provide a perspective on performance beyond the time of the audit ‐ an audit result does not guarantee that conditions will remain unchanged after the audit has been completed.

The auditing body must be aware of the limitations that exist for social and environmental audits. The audit body must not agree to accept an assignment that exceeds the competence of the audit body. Further, the audit body must communicate to clients, auditees, and others concerned what comprises an acceptable scope of work – aligned with industry standard practices and the ability of the audit body to perform the work in a professional, credible manner. Auditors and other concerned personnel must be fully familiar with these limitations.

2. REQUIREMENTS OF AUDITING BODIES

2.1 Organisation and management

a. General requirements

2.1.1 The auditing body is a legal entity4 (or part of a legal entity) and has a constitution which clearly defines its activities and responsibilities.

2.1.2 The auditing body has adequate and appropriate arrangements in place to cover any liabilities which may arise from its activity.

For second party auditing bodies, the organisation can demonstrate that they are not in a position whereby their impartiality could be compromised.

For third party auditing bodies, the organisation can demonstrate that they are not in a position whereby their impartiality could be compromised, particularly with regard to their finances and income.

4. A definition of legal entity can be found in the glossary of terms at the end of the document.

INTR

OD

UC

TIO

NCO

RE

PRIN

CIPL

ES

REQ

UIR

EMEN

TS

ALE

RTS

A

PPEA

LSCO

MPL

AIN

TS

FRA

UD

PR

EVEN

TIO

NEX

TER

NA

L CH

ALL

ENG

EA

PPEN

DIX

1

GLO

SSA

RY

– A

UD

ITO

R

COM

PETE

NCE

G

LOSS

AR

Y -

GEN

ERA

L

Com

pete

nce

of P

erso

nnel

Conti

nuou

s pr

ofes

sion

al d

evel

opm

ent

Su

b-Co

ntra

cting

Org

anis

ation

and

man

agem

ent

GLOBAL SOCIAL COMPLIANCE PROGRAMME_05

REFERENCE TOOL FOR AUDITING COMPETENCE - VERSION 2 / OCTOBER 2014

Competence of Personnel

Continuous professional developm

ent O

rganisation and m

anagement

Sub-Contracting

b. Structure

2.1.3 The auditing body has a clearly defined organisational and reporting structure; key job descriptions, scope of operations and expertise of personnel are fully documented and retained.

2.1.4 The auditing body has a designated manager with overall responsibility for ensuring the competency of personnel and the consistency of the operation of audits.

2.1.5 The auditing body has a clearly defined administrative system in place to facilitate operations on the ground e.g. coordinating auditors’ site visits, accommodation, etc.

2.1.6 The auditing body immediately notifies its clients and any organisation with whom they have a formal agreement or contractual arrangement of any significant material changes within its organisational structure (e.g. change of ownership, relevant staff changes, change of location or physical address, etc.).

c. Personnel

2.1.7 The auditing body has a system in place to ensure that their staff and any sub‐contracted personnel enjoy rights granted by local legislation, national legislation and applicable international labour standards. The auditing body should apply whichever affords the highest level of protection.

2.1.8 The auditing body ensures that impartiality of personnel involved in audit activities and confidentiality of information obtained during audit activities are maintained and monitored. The auditing body has a mechanism in place to ensure that no conflicts of interest exist. For example, in the event that the auditing body, its employees or sub‐contractors have links to, or relationships with, possible auditees, consultancies or former employees and any local industry associations, these links or relationships are clearly defined and controls are in place to ensure there is no compromise on the impartiality of the auditing body.

2.1.9 The reliability and quality of audits must be ensured through employment conditions and working time arrangements that enable auditors to complete their audit reports within their contractually agreed working hours. The auditing body should apply employment conditions which ensure that auditors are able to spend a reasonable part of their contractual working hours writing and completing audit reports. An audit report should be completed within a week following an audit. Conducting audits, including travel time, should normally not take up more than 65%‐75% of total working time and should be monitored.

2.1.10 The auditing body has effective systems to ensure the safety, protection and security of its auditors.

d. Audit management and quality assurance

2.1.11 A quality assurance system is in place to control and manage audits and a member from senior management will be assigned to report to top management on the performance of the audit management system and ensure the following:

• processes and procedures needed for the management system are established, implemented and maintained;

• the auditing body’s policy and commitment to quality are clearly defined and understood by personnel;

• a system of internal audit;

• a formal process for review of quality systems;

• a formal process for communication of quality systems to staff;

• a formal process for ensuring consistency of quality and standards across the auditing body;

• a formal process of periodic ‘shadow audits’ of each auditor by a senior / more experienced auditor within the auditing body to check competency and quality.

2.1.12 The auditing body has an effective internal audit system in place under the direct control of the auditing body’s management. Best practice could include regular peer review of the internal audit system.

2.1.13 The auditing body has an audit review process in place.

The audit review checks the integrity of the audit process and the correct completion of documentation.

In the unlikely event that any changes to the findings of an audit (i.e. changes, additions or removals of non‐compliances or observations) are made by a reviewer, these are signed off by the original auditor as well as the auditee. Notes of changes are kept by the auditing body and made available for inspection on request to organisations that have formal agreements or contractual arrangements with the auditing body in relation to the release of such information.

e. Record of findings and use of results

2.1.14 Full records of all audits are retained by the auditing body or deposited for safeguarding with a reliable external institution for a minimum duration of 5 years (as hard or digital copies), unless otherwise specified by data protection legislations. These records include the report, the checklist/auditing tools, auditor field notes and all information relating to non‐conformities and supporting evidence found on the day of the audit and on any follow‐up actions.

INTR

OD

UC

TION

COR

E PRIN

CIPLES R

EQU

IREM

ENTS

ALER

TS A

PPEALS

COM

PLAIN

TS FR

AU

D PR

EVEN

TION

EXTER

NA

L CH

ALLEN

GE

APPEN

DIX 1

GLO

SSAR

Y – AU

DITO

R

COM

PETENCE

G

LOSSA

RY -

GEN

ERA

L

06_GLOBAL SOCIAL COMPLIANCE PROGRAMME

REFERENCE TOOL FOR AUDITING COMPETENCE - VERSION 2 / OCTOBER 2014

2.1.15 The auditing body maintains a list of planned audits. This list is provided upon request to organisations that have formal agreements or contractual arrangements with the auditing body in relation to the release of such information.

2.1.16 The auditing body is prepared, upon request, to share any information related to the audit of a supplier or employment site, in accordance with the auditing body’s confidentiality policy, any formal agreement or contractual arrangement and its relevant legal obligations.

2.1.17 The auditing body will have an open approach to accepting shadow/witness assessments at the justifiable request of relevant and appropriate organisations, including but not limited to accreditation agencies, NGOs and trade unions, to evaluate the performance of the auditing body and its personnel within the terms of the applicable confidentiality rules.

2.2 Competence of personnel2.2.1 The auditing body employs personnel that demonstrate the required/relevant competences to fulfil the management, administrative and auditing functions relevant to their position/functions within the organisation.

2.2.2 The auditing body employs auditors and lead auditors familiar with the requirements as compiled in the GSCP reference requirements for auditors and lead auditors or its equivalent [see Appendix 1]. The auditors and lead auditors employed are trained to carry out audits on the subjects related to the GSCP Reference Code and Environmental Reference Requirements in addition to the codes of conducts specified by the buying companies for the suppliers.

2.2.3 The auditing body is able to demonstrate that individuals involved in technical audit reviews have a high level of experience and knowledge of, inter alia:

• the current version of the standard or code of conduct being applied;

• the current version of audit process/methodology of the audit in question;

• the current version of the audit reporting format of the audit in question;

• on‐site training on the audit process acquired by shadowing or witness auditing at least 5 audits of an experienced auditor/lead auditor;

• local laws, relevant standards and regulations;

• international standards and regulations, including the relevant International Labour Conventions and the UN Guiding Principles on Human Rights;

• human resource management, labour relations practices, collective agreements and social dialogue;

• existing relevant development projects taking place in the country of operation of the site or relating to the sector in which the site operates;

• good understanding of specific customer requirements;

• good understanding of the objective evidence needed in the audit report to identify and demonstrate any non‐compliances;

• writing skills in relevant language(s) (e.g the reviewer will need to have a good level to translate and review reports and CAP’s in English if relevant);

• appropriate experience prior to being nominated which includes, for technical audit reviewers, having successfully reviewed at least 10 audit reports (which is normally considered as a sufficient number) under the guidance of an experienced reviewer and signed off by a senior manager.

The auditing body is able to provide evidence of competency assessment of their reviewers.

2.2.4 The auditing body maintains up‐to‐date personnel records in accordance with data protection legislations, including relevant qualifications, training, experience, professional affiliations, and status, competence and any relevant consultancy services that may have been provided. This includes management and administrative personnel, in addition to those performing auditing activities.

2.2.5 When appointing a new employee or subcontractor whose duty is connected with auditing process, the auditing body requests a reference from a previous employer or organisation on behalf of which the auditor has conducted audits or undertaken audit review. This reference, which includes details of relevant experience, is fully reviewed by a senior member of the auditing body’s management and formally approved. Where appropriate, the auditing body undertakes searches of official data to verify the personal integrity of the new employee or subcontractor, in accordance with data protection legislation.

Com

pete

nce

of P

erso

nnel

Conti

nuou

s pr

ofes

sion

al d

evel

opm

ent

Su

b-Co

ntra

cting

Org

anis

ation

and

man

agem

ent

INTR

OD

UC

TIO

NCO

RE

PRIN

CIPL

ES

REQ

UIR

EMEN

TS

ALE

RTS

A

PPEA

LSCO

MPL

AIN

TS

FRA

UD

PR

EVEN

TIO

NEX

TER

NA

L CH

ALL

ENG

EA

PPEN

DIX

1

GLO

SSA

RY

– A

UD

ITO

R

COM

PETE

NCE

G

LOSS

AR

Y -

GEN

ERA

L

GLOBAL SOCIAL COMPLIANCE PROGRAMME_07

REFERENCE TOOL FOR AUDITING COMPETENCE - VERSION 2 / OCTOBER 2014

2.3 Continuous professional development The auditing body ensures that all auditors, lead auditors and audit reviewers, including the personnel of any subcontractors, are provided with the resources to maintain their knowledge of existing requirements of relevant codes they are auditing against, next to requirements as specified in the GSCP Reference Code, or its equivalent, in the International Labour Conventions and ILO Labour Conventions and/or in the GSCP Reference Environmental Requirements, or its equivalent.

2.3.1 The auditing body ensures that all auditors and lead auditors involved in authorising the final report:

a. Continue to meet the requirements stated in the GSCP reference requirements for auditors and lead auditors or its equivalent [see Appendix 1].

b. Maintain their knowledge of relevant standards and schemes.

c. Have access to facilities and organisations that will enable them to familiarise themselves with national laws, relevant standards and regulations.

d. Have been assessed and trained to meet the GSCP requirements for auditors and lead auditors or its equivalent (reference appendix 1). Records of qualifications, experience, training and assessment are maintained; these records confirm the tasks each staff member has been approved to undertake.

2.3.2 The auditing body has in place an ongoing programme to ensure that staff are able to continue to develop their knowledge and technical skills, including clear conditions and procedures allowing auditors to advance to lead auditor status.

To this end, the auditing body ensures ongoing professional development for all auditors and lead auditors involved in authorising the audit report. This includes training on audit methodology and best practice, including the GSCP Reference tools for Audit Process and Methodology (Social and Environmental), building familiarity with international human rights and labour norms, country legislation, relevant social and/or environmental issues and industry practices, and training on human resource management principles and practices, action planning/advising improvements.

2.3.3 The auditing body ensures that personnel are given formal updates as appropriate and undergo collective development workshops at least annually to ensure that personnel are fully updated with information and that interpretative matters are discussed and clarified.

2.3.4 The auditing body ensures that all personnel are subject to a systematic review and assessment programme at least annually to ensure satisfactory performance. This review will include inter alia shadow assessments and report review.

2.4 Sub-contracting 2.4.1 If the auditing body sub‐contracts any work to another party, a legally enforceable agreement is entered into with the contractual partner and documented procedures for the qualification and monitoring of all subcontracted bodies should be in place.

2.4.2 The primary auditing body is accountable for the quality of the audit, the audit report and any recommendations made regardless of whether the audit was conducted by its own staff or by sub‐contractors, and they should continue to meet all the requirements specified within this Reference tool, the other applicable GSCP Reference tools, or equivalent applicable rules and guidelines.

Competence of Personnel

Continuous professional developm

ent O

rganisation and m

anagement

Sub-Contracting

INTR

OD

UC

TION

COR

E PRIN

CIPLES R

EQU

IREM

ENTS

ALER

TS A

PPEALS

COM

PLAIN

TS FR

AU

D PR

EVEN

TION

EXTER

NA

L CH

ALLEN

GE

APPEN

DIX 1

GLO

SSAR

Y – AU

DITO

R

COM

PETENCE

G

LOSSA

RY -

GEN

ERA

L

08_GLOBAL SOCIAL COMPLIANCE PROGRAMME

REFERENCE TOOL FOR AUDITING COMPETENCE - VERSION 2 / OCTOBER 2014

5. COMPLAINTSA complaint refers to a situation where any party, including employees, trade unions or other stakeholders, express a grievance or dissatisfaction with events or behaviour during the auditing process. This can relate to a specific action or service of the auditing body, violations of laws and/or administrative rules.

5.1 The auditing body has an independent and documented procedure to manage, resolve and record all complaints.

a. Complaints are any expressions of grievance or dissatisfaction with a service provided.

3. ALERTS AND SENSITIVE INFORMATION3.1 The auditing body has a procedure in place to report to the audit requestor and when required or otherwise applicable to an appropriate accreditation body or standard or code owner or client:

• any information or indications regarding abuse or harassment of workers or breach of the law at a site being audited where the auditor has been unable to verify the information5;

• any information regarding the abuse or harassment of workers or breach of the law at a site being audited where reporting the issue directly to management risks putting workers or other staff members in danger;

• any information regarding critical non‐compliances6;

• any attempt to bribe, coerce or threaten an auditor, audit reviewer or audit administrator.

The auditing body ensures that information is treated sensitively in accordance with its confidentiality policy.

3.2 Any auditor observations concerning disregard of or breach against safety arrangements or regulations, whether directly related to the audit substance or not, that could put workers or other staff members in serious and/or imminent danger, and where an intervention by competent authorities could be considered necessary to protect health and safety, should be reported by auditors to the auditing body, who should raise the alert with the audit requestor.

3.3 In the event that abuses of rights of workers are reported after the audit to auditors or the auditing body, the auditing body will report this information to the audit requestor7, and when required or otherwise applicable, to an appropriate accreditation body or standard or code owner.

4. APPEALSAn appeal refers to a situation where an auditee disagrees with the way the audit has been led and/or with some findings of the audit and communicates its points of disagreement/divergence to the auditing body and to the audit requestor. The appeal procedure provides the auditee with the right and formal process to follow in order to oppose any findings of an audit.

4.1 The auditing body has a documented procedure to receive, evaluate and make decisions on appeals by auditees.

4.2 Details of the auditing body’s appeal handling procedure are publicly accessible.

4.3 In the event of an appeal, the auditing body ensures that the staff engaged in the appeal handling process is different from those who carried out the audits and undertook the audit review.

4.4 In the event that an appeal process is not resolved and as a last resort, the auditing body has a procedure in place to refer it to an independent third party.

4.5 The auditing body ensures that the submission, investigation of and decision on appeals do not result in any discriminatory actions against the auditee or any other party.

5. Guidance on how to report such information as well as a reference template can be found in the GSCP Reference Alert Notification (Appendix 4 of the GSCP Reference tools on Audit Process and Methodology), on www.gscpnet.com.

6. Guidance on non‐compliances is to be found in section 4.6.1 “Non‐compliances, Observations and Good Practice Evaluation” of the GSCP Reference Audit process (GSCP Reference tools on Audit Process and Methodology), on www.gscpnet.com.

7. Guidance on how to report such information as well as a reference template can be found in the GSCP Reference Supplementary Audit Information (Appendix 7 of the GSCP Reference tools on Audit Process and Methodology), on www.gscpnet.com.

INTR

OD

UC

TIO

NCO

RE

PRIN

CIPL

ES

REQ

UIR

EMEN

TS

ALE

RTS

A

PPEA

LSCO

MPL

AIN

TS

FRA

UD

PR

EVEN

TIO

NEX

TER

NA

L CH

ALL

ENG

EA

PPEN

DIX

1

GLO

SSA

RY

– A

UD

ITO

R

COM

PETE

NCE

G

LOSS

AR

Y -

GEN

ERA

L

GLOBAL SOCIAL COMPLIANCE PROGRAMME_09

REFERENCE TOOL FOR AUDITING COMPETENCE - VERSION 2 / OCTOBER 2014

6. FRAUD PREVENTION6.1 The auditing body has policies in place setting out the behaviour required of all staff involved in performing audits, reviewing audits and audit administration. This policy prohibits the acceptance of payments, samples, gifts or any other benefits.

6.2 All staff involved in performing audits, reviewing audits and audit administration, including subcontractors, receive training on this policy, and sign an agreement on an annual basis to indicate that they understand and abide by the policy.

6.3 The auditing body has a process in place to analyse the findings of auditors and identify anomalous results8.

6.4 The auditing body takes appropriate action to carry out a full investigation in the event of any allegations of fraud or attempted fraud involving an auditor or contracted staff involved with audit review or administration. The result of the investigation is made known to, and where appropriate acted upon by the auditing body’s senior management, which may include formal communication with the audit requestor, in accordance with any contractual or formal agreements.

8. Further guidance on how to identify anomalous results can be found in the GSCP Audit, Process and Methodology Reference tool and its appendices.

They can relate to:

/ a specific action or service of an auditing body;

/ violations of laws and/or administrative rules.

b. Complaints can be filed by individuals and/or organisations, such as audit requestor, auditor, supplier, worker, Trade Unions, NGOs or other interested parties.

Examples of complaints would be where there has been:

/ failure to provide a service at the agreed time or to the standard expected of the service;

/ expression of dissatisfaction in answering a query or responding to a request for contracted activities;

/ failure to follow the auditing body’s agreed policy, orders or procedures;

/ failure to take proper account of relevant matters in coming to a decision;

/ failure to involve and interview workers and their representatives discourteous or dishonest behaviour by a member of staff.

This may include also, but is not limited to fraud, bribery, and all issues relating to the behaviour of auditors and other contracted staff.

c. Every complaint requires an investigation and, if confirmed as true, appropriate follow‐up action.

5.2 The complaint procedure of the auditing body is transparent and publicly accessible. The procedure will be documented and a system will be in place to:

/ record;

/ evaluate;

/ decide on complaints;

/ ensure confidentiality of the complainant(s) and the subject of the complaint;

/ track and record any actions undertaken to resolve them;

/ follow up on any corrective actions which may be taken as a result.

5.3 Requests for clarification, further information, and/or timescales do not constitute a complaint. However, the auditing body has a documented procedure to manage any requests which require follow‐up and/or further action.

5.4 The auditing body ensures that the submission, investigation of and decision on complaints do not result in any discriminatory actions against any party involved in the complaint procedure.

5.5 In the event that a complaint is not resolved and as a last resort, the auditing body has a procedure in place to refer it to an independent third party.

5.6 The auditing body has a procedure in place for periodic analysis of complaints to identify systemic problems and develop appropriate solutions.

7. SUPPORT IN THE EVENT OF ANY EXTERNAL CHALLENGE

7.1 The auditing body undertakes to provide any necessary information and support that may be required by the audit requestor in the event of any claim, action, demand or

proceedings involving any employment site that it may have audited, in accordance with its confidentiality policy and relevant legal obligations.

INTR

OD

UC

TION

COR

E PRIN

CIPLES R

EQU

IREM

ENTS

ALER

TS A

PPEALS

COM

PLAIN

TS FR

AU

D PR

EVEN

TION

EXTER

NA

L CH

ALLEN

GE

APPEN

DIX 1

GLO

SSAR

Y – AU

DITO

R

COM

PETENCE

G

LOSSA

RY -

GEN

ERA

L

10_GLOBAL SOCIAL COMPLIANCE PROGRAMME

IntroductionThese requirements for the competence of auditors and lead auditors will ensure the relevant level of competency is established both for auditors and lead auditors and will enhance the professionalism of individuals carrying out the assessment of suppliers. It is envisaged the establishment

and collective acceptance of these competencies will help minimise any inconsistency between individual auditors and the audit results. This in turn will lead to increased confidence for the supplier and buyer alike.

ScopeThe auditor competence requirements relate to auditors and lead auditors who undertake audits within the scope of social compliance and environmental compliance.

In this document, the term auditor refers to a person with the competence to conduct an audit.

Lead auditor refers to the auditor of the audit team appointed as audit team leader and responsible for leading the audit team.

The Core auditor competences and prerequisite reference requirements (Table A) are complemented by Specific requirements for lead auditors (Table B) as well as a series of competence requirements to be satisfied by both Auditor and the Lead Auditor for social compliance (Table C) and environmental compliance (Table D).

The following tables specify the requirements for the competence of auditors and lead auditors in relation to social compliance and environmental compliance auditing.

Table A - Core auditor competence and prerequisite reference requirements (for social compliance assessment and environmental compliance assessment)

Table B - Specific lead auditor competence and prerequisite reference requirements (for social and environmental compliance assessment)

Table C - Specific auditor and lead auditor competence and prerequisite reference requirements-social compliance assessment

Table D - Specific auditor and lead auditor competence and prerequisite reference requirements - environmental compliance assessment

Note: In the event that an audit is conducted by a single auditor rather than an audit team, the auditor will have the same competence requirements as those defined for a lead auditor.

APPENDIX 1

Requirements for auditors and lead auditors

INTR

OD

UC

TIO

NCO

RE

PRIN

CIPL

ES

REQ

UIR

EMEN

TS

ALE

RTS

A

PPEA

LSCO

MPL

AIN

TS

FRA

UD

PR

EVEN

TIO

NEX

TER

NA

L CH

ALL

ENG

EA

PPEN

DIX

1

GLO

SSA

RY

– A

UD

ITO

R

COM

PETE

NCE

G

LOSS

AR

Y -

GEN

ERA

L

GLOBAL SOCIAL COMPLIANCE PROGRAMME_11

REFERENCE TOOL FOR AUDITING COMPETENCE - VERSION 2 / OCTOBER 2014

Tabl

e A

- Co

re a

udit

or c

ompe

tenc

e an

d pr

ereq

uisi

te re

fere

nce

requ

irem

ents

(f

or s

ocia

l and

env

iron

men

tal c

ompl

ianc

e as

sess

men

t)

COM

PETE

NCY

/ PR

EREQ

UIS

ITE

REQ

UIR

EMEN

T

Ethi

cal

• Th

e in

divi

dual

will

be

fair,

trut

hful

, unb

iase

d, s

ince

re, d

iscr

eet,

trus

twor

thy

and

hone

st.

• Th

e in

divi

dual

will

pos

sess

a h

igh

leve

l of i

nteg

rity,

par

ticul

arly

in re

latio

n to

brib

ery

and

corr

upt p

racti

ces.

Ope

n-m

inde

dTh

e in

divi

dual

will

be

open

‐min

ded,

reas

onab

le a

nd w

ill b

e w

illin

g to

con

side

r alte

rnati

ve id

eas

or p

oint

s of

vie

w.

Dip

lom

atic

The

indi

vidu

al w

ill b

e ta

ctful

in d

ealin

gs w

ith p

eopl

e, a

s ap

prop

riate

to a

chie

ve th

e au

dit o

bjec

tives

.

Obs

erva

ntTh

e in

divi

dual

will

be

fully

aw

are

of p

hysi

cal s

urro

undi

ngs,

peo

ple

and

activ

ities

thro

ugho

ut th

e en

tire

audi

t pro

cess

.

Perc

epti

veTh

e in

divi

dual

will

insti

nctiv

ely

be a

war

e of

and

be

able

to u

nder

stan

d si

tuati

ons.

Vers

atile

The

indi

vidu

al w

ill b

e ab

le to

adj

ust r

eadi

ly to

diff

eren

t situ

ation

s an

d to

effe

ctive

ly re

solv

e co

nflic

t and

arr

ive

at c

onse

nsus

agr

eem

ent

as fa

r as

poss

ible

.

Tena

ciou

sTh

e in

divi

dual

will

be

pers

iste

nt a

nd fo

cuss

ed in

thei

r app

roac

h to

ach

ieve

obj

ectiv

es.

Dec

isiv

eTh

e in

divi

dual

will

be

able

to re

ach

timel

y co

nclu

sion

s ba

sed

on lo

gica

l rea

soni

ng a

nd a

naly

sis,

and

in th

e ca

se o

f pos

sibl

e co

nflic

t,

be c

onfid

ent t

o m

anag

e an

d co

ntro

l dis

cuss

ions

. The

indi

vidu

al w

ill a

ssum

e th

e le

ader

ship

role

dur

ing

prob

lem

atica

l dis

cuss

ions

and

si

tuati

ons

in o

rder

to re

solv

e is

sues

.

Self-

relia

ntTh

e in

divi

dual

will

be

able

to a

ct e

ffecti

vely

and

func

tion

inde

pend

ently

dur

ing

audi

ts.

Ethi

cally

and

mor

ally

cou

rage

ous

The

indi

vidu

al w

ill a

ct p

rofe

ssio

nally

and

eth

ical

ly a

nd m

ake

deci

sion

s ev

en th

ough

thes

e ac

tions

and

dec

isio

ns m

ay re

sult

in

disa

gree

men

t, co

nfro

ntati

on o

r app

eal p

roce

edin

gs.

Prof

essi

onal

• Th

e in

divi

dual

will

be

cour

teou

s, c

onsc

ienti

ous,

dis

cree

t and

bus

ines

s lik

e in

thei

r app

roac

h to

aud

iting

. •

The

indi

vidu

al w

ill h

ave

the

abili

ty to

dea

l sen

sitiv

ely

with

peo

ple

from

diff

eren

t bac

kgro

unds

and

to m

ake

them

feel

at e

ase,

in o

rder

to

reso

lve

confl

ict w

ithou

t los

ing

com

posu

re.

• Th

e in

divi

dual

will

be

empa

theti

c, re

spec

tful

to o

ther

s an

d w

ill h

elp

to b

uild

trus

t dur

ing

and

after

the

audi

t.

• Th

e in

divi

dual

will

kee

p re

leva

nt in

form

ation

con

fiden

tial i

n ac

cord

ance

with

non

‐dis

clos

ure

or c

onfid

entia

lity

agre

emen

ts.

• Th

e in

divi

dual

will

com

mun

icat

e co

nfide

ntly

and

with

aut

horit

y to

sec

ure

agre

emen

t with

aud

itee

man

agem

ent.

• Th

e in

divi

dual

will

mai

ntai

n st

rict i

ndep

ende

nce

from

sel

f‐in

tere

st o

r per

sona

l bia

s.

Resp

ectf

ulTh

e in

divi

dual

will

act

resp

ectf

ully

, sho

w p

olite

ness

and

goo

d m

anne

rs.

Org

anis

ation

al s

kills

• Th

e in

divi

dual

will

effe

ctive

ly p

lan,

prio

ritise

and

adj

ust t

he a

ctivi

ties

to a

udite

e ne

eds

as fa

r as

poss

ible

, with

out a

dver

sely

affe

cting

th

e au

dit.

• Th

e in

divi

dual

will

hav

e go

od o

rgan

isati

onal

and

tim

e m

anag

emen

t ski

lls.

Logi

cal j

udge

men

tTh

e in

divi

dual

will

mak

e co

rrec

t dec

isio

ns b

ased

on

obje

ctive

and

ver

ifiab

le e

vide

nce.

INTR

OD

UC

TION

COR

E PRIN

CIPLES R

EQU

IREM

ENTS

ALER

TS A

PPEALS

COM

PLAIN

TS FR

AU

D PR

EVEN

TION

EXTER

NA

L CH

ALLEN

GE

APPEN

DIX 1

GLO

SSAR

Y – AU

DITO

R

COM

PETENCE

G

LOSSA

RY -

GEN

ERA

L

12_GLOBAL SOCIAL COMPLIANCE PROGRAMME

REFERENCE TOOL FOR AUDITING COMPETENCE - VERSION 2 / OCTOBER 2014 … A

udit

pri

ncip

les,

pro

cedu

res

an

d te

chni

ques

• Th

e in

divi

dual

will

app

ly a

udit

prin

cipl

es, p

roce

dure

s an

d te

chni

ques

ass

ocia

ted

with

man

agem

ent s

yste

ms

and

poss

ess

a de

taile

d kn

owle

dge

of c

ompl

ianc

e is

sues

com

mon

ly e

xper

ienc

ed w

ith s

uch

syst

ems

and

defin

ed in

any

cod

e or

sta

ndar

d au

dite

d ag

ains

t.•

The

indi

vidu

al w

ill p

rior

itise

and

focu

s on

matt

ers

of s

igni

fican

ce a

nd u

nder

stan

d th

e ap

prop

riat

enes

s an

d co

nseq

uenc

es o

f usi

ng

sam

plin

g te

chni

ques

for

audi

ting.

• Th

e in

divi

dual

will

be

able

to v

erify

the

accu

racy

of c

olle

cted

info

rmati

on a

nd b

e aw

are

of th

e si

gnifi

canc

e an

d ap

prop

riat

enes

s

of a

udit

evid

ence

to s

uppo

rt a

udit

findi

ngs

and

conc

lusi

ons.

• Th

e in

divi

dual

will

und

erst

and

and

asse

ss th

ose

fact

ors

that

can

affe

ct th

e re

liabi

lity

of th

e au

dit fi

ndin

gs a

nd c

oncl

usio

ns.

Man

agem

ent

syst

ems

an

d re

fere

nce

docu

men

ts•

The

indi

vidu

al w

ill h

ave

a de

taile

d kn

owle

dge

of m

anag

emen

t sys

tem

s st

anda

rds,

app

licab

le p

roce

dure

s or

oth

er m

anag

emen

t sy

stem

s do

cum

ents

use

d as

aud

it cr

iteri

a.•

The

indi

vidu

al w

ill h

ave

the

abili

ty to

app

ly m

anag

emen

t sys

tem

s pr

inci

ples

to d

iffer

ent o

rgan

isati

ons

and

to in

tera

ction

bet

wee

n co

mpo

nent

s of

the

man

agem

ent s

yste

m.

• Th

e in

divi

dual

will

und

erst

and

and

act u

pon

diffe

renc

es b

etw

een

and

the

prio

rity

of r

efer

ence

doc

umen

ts a

nd u

nder

stan

d th

e ne

ed to

app

ly s

peci

fic re

fere

nce

docu

men

ts to

diff

eren

t aud

it si

tuati

ons.

• Th

e in

divi

dual

will

hav

e kn

owle

dge

of in

form

ation

sys

tem

s an

d te

chno

logy

for

auth

oris

ation

, sec

urity

, dis

trib

ution

and

con

trol

of

docu

men

ts, d

ata

and

reco

rds.

Org

anis

ation

al s

itua

tion

s•

The

indi

vidu

al w

ill h

ave

know

ledg

e of

gen

eral

bus

ines

s pr

oces

ses

and

will

und

erst

and

the

wor

king

s of

org

anis

ation

s in

rela

tion

to

size

, str

uctu

re, f

uncti

on a

nd re

latio

nshi

ps.

• Th

e in

divi

dual

will

hav

e kn

owle

dge

of s

peci

fic fu

nctio

ns w

ith p

artic

ular

refe

renc

e to

Hum

an R

esou

rces

man

agem

ent,

pay

roll

syst

ems,

pro

ducti

vity

sys

tem

s, u

nion

rela

tions

hips

, col

lecti

ve b

arga

inin

g pr

oces

ses,

rele

vant

col

lecti

ve a

gree

men

ts, o

ther

wor

ker

repr

esen

tatio

n an

d w

orke

r gr

ieva

nce

proc

edur

es.

• Th

e in

divi

dual

will

und

erst

and

the

soci

al, e

cono

mic

and

cul

tura

l rel

ation

ship

s at

wor

kpla

ces

and

in c

omm

uniti

es.

App

licab

le la

ws,

regu

lati

ons

an

d ot

her

requ

irem

ents

rele

vant

to

the

disc

iplin

e

The

indi

vidu

al w

ill h

ave

deta

iled

know

ledg

e of

nati

onal

and

loca

l law

s, In

tern

ation

al H

uman

Rig

hts

and

Labo

ur S

tand

ards

and

co

llecti

ve a

gree

men

ts th

at a

pply

to th

e or

gani

satio

n be

ing

audi

ted,

with

par

ticul

ar re

fere

nce

to o

ne o

f the

are

as li

sted

und

er e

ither

so

cial

com

plia

nce

or e

nviro

nmen

tal c

ompl

ianc

e, d

epen

ding

on

the

audi

t’s s

cope

:

1. S

ocia

l Com

plia

nce

Ass

essm

ent:

/

empl

oym

ent l

aw a

nd a

pplic

able

col

lecti

ve a

gree

men

ts re

late

d to

wag

es, b

enefi

ts, h

ours

of w

orki

ng, r

emun

erati

on c

odes

of

pra

ctice

and

sta

ndar

ds, h

olid

ays

and

empl

oym

ent t

erm

inati

on c

odes

and

sta

ndar

ds, s

ubco

ntra

cting

and

hom

e w

orki

ng;

/ ch

ild la

bour

;/

forc

ed la

bour

;/

hara

ssm

ent,

dis

crim

inati

on a

nd a

buse

; /

age

and

wor

king

rest

ricti

ons;

/ fr

eedo

m o

f mov

emen

t;/

free

dom

of a

ssoc

iatio

n;/

righ

t to

colle

ctive

bar

gain

ing;

/ pr

egna

ncy

and

mat

erni

ty c

odes

and

sta

ndar

ds;

/ th

e in

divi

dual

will

hav

e de

taile

d kn

owle

dge

of in

tern

ation

al tr

eatie

s an

d co

nven

tions

, with

par

ticul

ar re

fere

nce

to IL

O

Conv

entio

ns a

nd R

ecom

men

datio

ns a

nd In

tern

ation

al H

uman

Rig

hts

Conv

entio

ns a

nd tr

eatie

s, in

clud

ing

the

UN

Dec

lara

tion

of H

uman

Rig

hts

and

Gui

ding

Pri

ncip

les

on B

usin

ess

and

Hum

an R

ight

s;

/ th

e in

divi

dual

will

hav

e de

taile

d kn

owle

dge

of e

xisti

ng re

leva

nt d

evel

opm

ent p

roje

cts

invo

lvin

g th

e si

te, s

ecto

r an

d/or

cou

ntry

of

ope

ratio

ns;

/ th

e in

divi

dual

will

hav

e de

taile

d kn

owle

dge

of s

peci

fic re

quire

men

ts in

rela

tion

to s

peci

fic c

usto

mer

con

trac

tual

requ

irem

ents

;/

the

indi

vidu

al w

ill h

ave

deta

iled

know

ledg

e of

the

spec

ific

code

or

stan

dard

aga

inst

whi

ch a

n au

dit i

s un

dert

aken

;/

heal

th a

nd s

afet

y na

tiona

l and

loca

l law

s th

at a

pply

to th

e or

gani

satio

n be

ing

audi

ted;

/ th

e in

divi

dual

will

hav

e kn

owle

dge

of in

tern

ation

al tr

eatie

s an

d co

nven

tions

, with

par

ticul

ar re

fere

nce

to IL

O C

onve

ntion

s an

d Re

com

men

datio

ns re

latin

g to

Hea

lth a

nd S

afet

y.

2. E

nvir

onm

enta

l Com

plia

nce

Ass

essm

ent:

/ th

e in

divi

dual

will

hav

e a

deta

iled

know

ledg

e of

nati

onal

and

loca

l law

s th

at a

pply

to th

e or

gani

satio

n be

ing

audi

ted,

with

pa

rticu

lar r

efer

ence

to E

nviro

nmen

tal l

aw;

/ th

e in

divi

dual

will

hav

e a

deta

iled

know

ledg

e of

spe

cific

requ

irem

ents

in re

latio

n to

spe

cific

cus

tom

er c

ontr

actu

al re

quire

men

ts;

/ th

e in

divi

dual

will

hav

e a

deta

iled

know

ledg

e of

the

spec

ific

code

or

stan

dard

aga

inst

whi

ch a

n au

dit i

s un

dert

aken

.

Read

ing

The

indi

vidu

al w

ill u

nder

stan

d an

d in

terp

ret w

ritt

en m

ater

ial w

ith p

artic

ular

refe

renc

e to

pay

roll,

em

ploy

men

t rec

ords

and

fact

ory

reco

rds.

Wri

ting

• Th

e in

divi

dual

will

hav

e go

od w

ritt

en c

omm

unic

ation

ski

lls.

• Th

e in

divi

dual

will

pro

duce

wri

tten

doc

umen

ts th

at c

an b

e un

ders

tood

by

the

inte

nded

aud

ienc

e.•

The

indi

vidu

al w

ill p

rodu

ce c

lear

and

acc

urat

e re

port

s on

aud

it fin

ding

s an

d cl

earl

y ar

ticul

ate

thes

e in

rela

tion

to le

gal r

equi

re-

men

ts a

nd re

leva

nt c

odes

.

List

enin

g•

The

indi

vidu

al w

ill u

nder

stan

d an

d in

terp

ret v

erba

l mat

eria

l.•

The

indi

vidu

al w

ill u

nder

stan

d an

d in

terp

ret n

on v

erba

l com

mun

icati

on, s

uch

as g

estu

res,

and

per

sona

l exp

ress

ion.

Num

erac

yTh

e in

divi

dual

will

und

erst

and

and

inte

rpre

t num

ber

syst

ems

and

thei

r si

gnifi

canc

e.

Ora

l pre

sent

ation

• Th

e in

divi

dual

will

hav

e go

od o

ral c

omm

unic

ation

ski

lls, w

hich

is a

ppro

pria

te a

nd m

akes

him

/her

und

erst

ood

by th

e in

tend

ed

audi

ence

.•

The

indi

vidu

al w

ill p

rovi

de c

lear

and

acc

urat

e or

al re

pres

enta

tion

on a

udit

findi

ngs

at c

losi

ng m

eetin

gs a

nd c

lear

ly a

rticu

late

thes

e in

rela

tion

to le

gal r

equi

rem

ents

and

rele

vant

cod

es.

Inte

rvie

win

g•

The

indi

vidu

al w

ill b

e ex

peri

ence

d in

diff

eren

t typ

es o

f int

ervi

ewin

g te

chni

ques

.•

The

indi

vidu

al w

ill u

nder

stan

d th

e pr

inci

ples

of s

ampl

ing

tech

niqu

es w

ith re

spec

t to

grou

p or

indi

vidu

al in

terv

iew

s an

d cu

ltura

l co

nsid

erati

ons.

The

indi

vidu

al w

ill h

ave

the

abili

ty to

inte

rvie

w p

erso

nnel

with

out c

ompr

omis

ing

the

sour

ce o

f inf

orm

ation

.•

The

indi

vidu

al w

ill d

eal d

iscr

eetly

with

per

sonn

el w

ho m

ay fe

el c

ompr

omis

ed o

r fe

el u

ncom

fort

able

bei

ng in

terv

iew

ed.

Faci

litati

ng m

eeti

ngs

The

indi

vidu

al w

ill e

ffecti

vely

con

trol

and

man

age

mee

tings

dur

ing

the

audi

t.

Lang

uage

• Th

e in

divi

dual

will

be

a flu

ent s

peak

er a

nd re

ader

of t

he la

ngua

ge(s

) use

d by

man

ager

s, a

dmin

istr

ator

s an

d w

orke

rs o

f the

or

gani

satio

n be

ing

audi

ted.

Und

er c

ircum

stan

ces

whe

re th

e in

divi

dual

’s li

ngui

stic

skill

s ar

e lim

ited

or w

here

sev

eral

lang

uage

s ar

e us

ed a

t an

wor

kpla

ce,

the

indi

vidu

al w

ill c

omm

unic

ate

effec

tivel

y th

roug

h an

inte

rpre

ter.

Tech

nica

l lan

guag

eTh

e au

dito

rs w

ill h

ave

know

ledg

e of

the

tech

nica

l lan

guag

e em

ploy

ed o

nsite

, dep

endi

ng o

n its

indu

stry

sec

tor.

Frau

d de

tecti

onTh

e in

divi

dual

will

und

erst

and

and

has

the

skill

s to

det

ect c

omm

only

use

d m

etho

ds o

f doc

umen

t man

ipul

ation

, fra

udul

ent a

ction

s an

d fr

audu

lent

pra

ctice

s.

INTR

OD

UC

TIO

NCO

RE

PRIN

CIPL

ES

REQ

UIR

EMEN

TS

ALE

RTS

A

PPEA

LSCO

MPL

AIN

TS

FRA

UD

PR

EVEN

TIO

NEX

TER

NA

L CH

ALL

ENG

EG

LOSS

AR

Y –

AU

DIT

OR

CO

MPE

TEN

CE

G

LOSS

AR

Y -

GEN

ERA

LA

PPEN

DIX

1

GLOBAL SOCIAL COMPLIANCE PROGRAMME_13

REFERENCE TOOL FOR AUDITING COMPETENCE - VERSION 2 / OCTOBER 2014

…Aud

it p

rinc

iple

s, p

roce

dure

s

and

tech

niqu

es•

The

indi

vidu

al w

ill a

pply

aud

it pr

inci

ples

, pro

cedu

res

and

tech

niqu

es a

ssoc

iate

d w

ith m

anag

emen

t sys

tem

s an

d po

sses

s a

deta

iled

know

ledg

e of

com

plia

nce

issu

es c

omm

only

exp

erie

nced

with

suc

h sy

stem

s an

d de

fined

in a

ny c

ode

or s

tand

ard

audi

ted

agai

nst.

• Th

e in

divi

dual

will

pri

oriti

se a

nd fo

cus

on m

atter

s of

sig

nific

ance

and

und

erst

and

the

appr

opri

aten

ess

and

cons

eque

nces

of u

sing

sa

mpl

ing

tech

niqu

es fo

r au

ditin

g.•

The

indi

vidu

al w

ill b

e ab

le to

ver

ify th

e ac

cura

cy o

f col

lect

ed in

form

ation

and

be

awar

e of

the

sign

ifica

nce

and

appr

opri

aten

ess

of

aud

it ev

iden

ce to

sup

port

aud

it fin

ding

s an

d co

nclu

sion

s.•

The

indi

vidu

al w

ill u

nder

stan

d an

d as

sess

thos

e fa

ctor

s th

at c

an a

ffect

the

relia

bilit

y of

the

audi

t find

ings

and

con

clus

ions

.

Man

agem

ent

syst

ems

an

d re

fere

nce

docu

men

ts•

The

indi

vidu

al w

ill h

ave

a de

taile

d kn

owle

dge

of m

anag

emen

t sys

tem

s st

anda

rds,

app

licab

le p

roce

dure

s or

oth

er m

anag

emen

t sy

stem

s do

cum

ents

use

d as

aud

it cr

iteri

a.•

The

indi

vidu

al w

ill h

ave

the

abili

ty to

app

ly m

anag

emen

t sys

tem

s pr

inci

ples

to d

iffer

ent o

rgan

isati

ons

and

to in

tera

ction

bet

wee

n co

mpo

nent

s of

the

man

agem

ent s

yste

m.

• Th

e in

divi

dual

will

und

erst

and

and

act u

pon

diffe

renc

es b

etw

een

and

the

prio

rity

of r

efer

ence

doc

umen

ts a

nd u

nder

stan

d th

e ne

ed to

app

ly s

peci

fic re

fere

nce

docu

men

ts to

diff

eren

t aud

it si

tuati

ons.

• Th

e in

divi

dual

will

hav

e kn

owle

dge

of in

form

ation

sys

tem

s an

d te

chno

logy

for

auth

oris

ation

, sec

urity

, dis

trib

ution

and

con

trol

of

docu

men

ts, d

ata

and

reco

rds.

Org

anis

ation

al s

itua

tion

s•

The

indi

vidu

al w

ill h

ave

know

ledg

e of

gen

eral

bus

ines

s pr

oces

ses

and

will

und

erst

and

the

wor

king

s of

org

anis

ation

s in

rela

tion

to

size

, str

uctu

re, f

uncti

on a

nd re

latio

nshi

ps.

• Th

e in

divi

dual

will

hav

e kn

owle

dge

of s

peci

fic fu

nctio

ns w

ith p

artic

ular

refe

renc

e to

Hum

an R

esou

rces

man

agem

ent,

pay

roll

syst

ems,

pro

ducti

vity

sys

tem

s, u

nion

rela

tions

hips

, col

lecti

ve b

arga

inin

g pr

oces

ses,

rele

vant

col

lecti

ve a

gree

men

ts, o

ther

wor

ker

repr

esen

tatio

n an

d w

orke

r gr

ieva

nce

proc

edur

es.

• Th

e in

divi

dual

will

und

erst

and

the

soci

al, e

cono

mic

and

cul

tura

l rel

ation

ship

s at

wor

kpla

ces

and

in c

omm

uniti

es.

App

licab

le la

ws,

regu

lati

ons

an

d ot

her

requ

irem

ents

rele

vant

to

the

disc

iplin

e

The

indi

vidu

al w

ill h

ave

deta

iled

know

ledg

e of

nati

onal

and

loca

l law

s, In

tern

ation

al H

uman

Rig

hts

and

Labo

ur S

tand

ards

and

co

llecti

ve a

gree

men

ts th

at a

pply

to th

e or

gani

satio

n be

ing

audi

ted,

with

par

ticul

ar re

fere

nce

to o

ne o

f the

are

as li

sted

und

er e

ither

so

cial

com

plia

nce

or e

nviro

nmen

tal c

ompl

ianc

e, d

epen

ding

on

the

audi

t’s s

cope

:

1. S

ocia

l Com

plia

nce

Ass

essm

ent:

/

empl

oym

ent l

aw a

nd a

pplic

able

col

lecti

ve a

gree

men

ts re

late

d to

wag

es, b

enefi

ts, h

ours

of w

orki

ng, r

emun

erati

on c

odes

of

pra

ctice

and

sta

ndar

ds, h

olid

ays

and

empl

oym

ent t

erm

inati

on c

odes

and

sta

ndar

ds, s

ubco

ntra

cting

and

hom

e w

orki

ng;

/ ch

ild la

bour

;/

forc

ed la

bour

;/

hara

ssm

ent,

dis

crim

inati

on a

nd a

buse

; /

age

and

wor

king

rest

ricti

ons;

/ fr

eedo

m o

f mov

emen

t;/

free

dom

of a

ssoc

iatio

n;/

righ

t to

colle

ctive

bar

gain

ing;

/ pr

egna

ncy

and

mat

erni

ty c

odes

and

sta

ndar

ds;

/ th

e in

divi

dual

will

hav

e de

taile

d kn

owle

dge

of in

tern

ation

al tr

eatie

s an

d co

nven

tions

, with

par

ticul

ar re

fere

nce

to IL

O

Conv

entio

ns a

nd R

ecom

men

datio

ns a

nd In

tern

ation

al H

uman

Rig

hts

Conv

entio

ns a

nd tr

eatie

s, in

clud

ing

the

UN

Dec

lara

tion

of H

uman

Rig

hts

and

Gui

ding

Pri

ncip

les

on B

usin

ess

and

Hum

an R

ight

s;

/ th

e in

divi

dual

will

hav

e de

taile

d kn

owle

dge

of e

xisti

ng re

leva

nt d

evel

opm

ent p

roje

cts

invo

lvin

g th

e si

te, s

ecto

r an

d/or

cou

ntry

of

ope

ratio

ns;

/ th

e in

divi

dual

will

hav

e de

taile

d kn

owle

dge

of s

peci

fic re

quire

men

ts in

rela

tion

to s

peci

fic c

usto

mer

con

trac

tual

requ

irem

ents

;/

the

indi

vidu

al w

ill h

ave

deta

iled

know

ledg

e of

the

spec

ific

code

or

stan

dard

aga

inst

whi

ch a

n au

dit i

s un

dert

aken

;/

heal

th a

nd s

afet

y na

tiona

l and

loca

l law

s th

at a

pply

to th

e or

gani

satio

n be

ing

audi

ted;

/ th

e in

divi

dual

will

hav

e kn

owle

dge

of in

tern

ation

al tr

eatie

s an

d co

nven

tions

, with

par

ticul

ar re

fere

nce

to IL

O C

onve

ntion

s an

d Re

com

men

datio

ns re

latin

g to

Hea

lth a

nd S

afet

y.

2. E

nvir

onm

enta

l Com

plia

nce

Ass

essm

ent:

/ th

e in

divi

dual

will

hav

e a

deta

iled

know

ledg

e of

nati

onal

and

loca

l law

s th

at a

pply

to th

e or

gani

satio

n be

ing

audi

ted,

with

pa

rticu

lar r

efer

ence

to E

nviro

nmen

tal l

aw;

/ th

e in

divi

dual

will

hav

e a

deta

iled

know

ledg

e of

spe

cific

requ

irem

ents

in re

latio

n to

spe

cific

cus

tom

er c

ontr

actu

al re

quire

men

ts;

/ th

e in

divi

dual

will

hav

e a

deta

iled

know

ledg

e of

the

spec

ific

code

or

stan

dard

aga

inst

whi

ch a

n au

dit i

s un

dert

aken

.

Read

ing

The

indi

vidu

al w

ill u

nder

stan

d an

d in

terp

ret w

ritt

en m

ater

ial w

ith p

artic

ular

refe

renc

e to

pay

roll,

em

ploy

men

t rec

ords

and

fact

ory

reco

rds.

Wri

ting

• Th

e in

divi

dual

will

hav

e go

od w

ritt

en c

omm

unic

ation

ski

lls.

• Th

e in

divi

dual

will

pro

duce

wri

tten

doc

umen

ts th

at c

an b

e un

ders

tood

by

the

inte

nded

aud

ienc

e.•

The

indi

vidu

al w

ill p

rodu

ce c

lear

and

acc

urat

e re

port

s on

aud

it fin

ding

s an

d cl

earl

y ar

ticul

ate

thes

e in

rela

tion

to le

gal r

equi

re-

men

ts a

nd re

leva

nt c

odes

.

List

enin

g•

The

indi

vidu

al w

ill u

nder

stan

d an

d in

terp

ret v

erba

l mat

eria

l.•

The

indi

vidu

al w

ill u

nder

stan

d an

d in

terp

ret n

on v

erba

l com

mun

icati

on, s

uch

as g

estu

res,

and

per

sona

l exp

ress

ion.

Num

erac

yTh

e in

divi

dual

will

und

erst

and

and

inte

rpre

t num

ber

syst

ems

and

thei

r si

gnifi

canc

e.

Ora

l pre

sent

ation

• Th

e in

divi

dual

will

hav

e go

od o

ral c

omm

unic

ation

ski

lls, w

hich

is a

ppro

pria

te a

nd m

akes

him

/her

und

erst

ood

by th

e in

tend

ed

audi

ence

.•

The

indi

vidu

al w

ill p

rovi

de c

lear

and

acc

urat

e or

al re

pres

enta

tion

on a

udit

findi

ngs

at c

losi

ng m

eetin

gs a

nd c

lear

ly a

rticu

late

thes

e in

rela

tion

to le

gal r

equi

rem

ents

and

rele

vant

cod

es.

Inte

rvie

win

g•

The

indi

vidu

al w

ill b

e ex

peri

ence

d in

diff

eren

t typ

es o

f int

ervi

ewin

g te

chni

ques

.•

The

indi

vidu

al w

ill u

nder

stan

d th

e pr

inci

ples

of s

ampl

ing

tech

niqu

es w

ith re

spec

t to

grou

p or

indi

vidu

al in

terv

iew

s an

d cu

ltura

l co

nsid

erati

ons.

The

indi

vidu

al w

ill h

ave

the

abili

ty to

inte

rvie

w p

erso

nnel

with

out c

ompr

omis

ing

the

sour

ce o

f inf

orm

ation

.•

The

indi

vidu

al w

ill d

eal d

iscr

eetly

with

per

sonn

el w

ho m

ay fe

el c

ompr

omis

ed o

r fe

el u

ncom

fort

able

bei

ng in

terv

iew

ed.

Faci

litati

ng m

eeti

ngs

The

indi

vidu

al w

ill e

ffecti

vely

con

trol

and

man

age

mee

tings

dur

ing

the

audi

t.

Lang

uage

• Th

e in

divi

dual

will

be

a flu

ent s

peak

er a

nd re

ader

of t

he la

ngua

ge(s

) use

d by

man

ager

s, a

dmin

istr

ator

s an

d w

orke

rs o

f the

or

gani

satio

n be

ing

audi

ted.

Und

er c

ircum

stan

ces

whe

re th

e in

divi

dual

’s li

ngui

stic

skill

s ar

e lim

ited

or w

here

sev

eral

lang

uage

s ar

e us

ed a

t an

wor

kpla

ce,

the

indi

vidu

al w

ill c

omm

unic

ate

effec

tivel

y th

roug

h an

inte

rpre

ter.

Tech

nica

l lan

guag

eTh

e au

dito

rs w

ill h

ave

know

ledg

e of

the

tech

nica

l lan

guag

e em

ploy

ed o

nsite

, dep

endi

ng o

n its

indu

stry

sec

tor.

Frau

d de

tecti

onTh

e in

divi

dual

will

und

erst

and

and

has

the

skill

s to

det

ect c

omm

only

use

d m

etho

ds o

f doc

umen

t man

ipul

ation

, fra

udul

ent a

ction

s an

d fr

audu

lent

pra

ctice

s.

INTR

OD

UC

TION

COR

E PRIN

CIPLES R

EQU

IREM

ENTS

ALER

TS A

PPEALS

COM

PLAIN

TS FR

AU

D PR

EVEN

TION

EXTER

NA

L CH

ALLEN

GE

GLO

SSAR

Y – AU

DITO

R

COM

PETENCE

G

LOSSA

RY -

GEN

ERA

LA

PPEND

IX 1

14_GLOBAL SOCIAL COMPLIANCE PROGRAMME

REFERENCE TOOL FOR AUDITING COMPETENCE - VERSION 2 / OCTOBER 2014 … A

ction

pla

nnin

g/ad

vice

The

indi

vidu

al w

ill h

ave

the

capa

bilit

y to

adv

ise

on w

ays

to e

ffecti

vely

reso

lve

non‐

conf

orm

ities

in a

pra

ctica

l way

that

mee

ts

the

requ

irem

ents

of r

elev

ant s

tand

ards

whe

n ap

prop

riat

e an

d w

ithin

the

scop

e of

cus

tom

ers

expe

ctati

ons9 .

Det

ecti

on s

kills

• Th

e in

divi

dual

will

hav

e kn

owle

dge

and

inve

stiga

tive

skill

s to

det

ect n

on‐c

onfo

rmiti

es w

hich

may

hav

e be

en s

ubje

ct to

m

anip

ulati

ve p

racti

ces

by th

e au

dite

e or

any

oth

er s

ourc

es to

pre

vent

det

ectio

n.•

The

indi

vidu

al w

ill h

ave

the

inve

stiga

tive

skill

s to

det

erm

ine

the

auth

entic

ity o

f inf

orm

ation

and

to v

erify

pos

sibl

e al

lega

tions

m

ade

by o

ther

sou

rces

.

Ana

lyti

cal s

kills

The

indi

vidu

al w

ill e

ffecti

vely

and

sys

tem

atica

lly a

sses

s si

tuati

ons

and

info

rmati

on to

mak

e in

form

ed d

ecis

ions

on

obje

ctive

an

d ve

rifia

ble

evid

ence

.

Inte

rper

sona

l ski

lls•

The

indi

vidu

al w

ill h

ave

skill

s to

ens

ure

effec

tive

com

mun

icati

on b

etw

een

them

selv

es a

nd o

ther

peo

ple.

• Th

e in

divi

dual

will

hav

e go

od p

eopl

e m

anag

emen

t ski

lls.

• Th

e in

divi

dual

will

hav

e go

od c

omm

unic

ation

ski

lls in

rela

tion

to a

situ

ation

whi

ch w

arra

nts

care

ful i

nfor

mati

on g

athe

ring

suc

h as

is

sues

rela

ting

to g

ende

r, ra

ce, c

ultu

re, p

ossi

ble

disc

rim

inati

on a

nd w

orke

r/m

anag

emen

t dis

pute

.

Educ

ation

The

indi

vidu

al w

ill h

ave

succ

essf

ully

com

plet

ed e

duca

tion

to d

egre

e le

vel o

r de

mon

stra

te e

quiv

alen

t exp

erie

nce

to c

ompl

y w

ith

the

pers

onal

ski

lls re

quire

men

ts o

f thi

s do

cum

ent,

i.e.

read

ing,

wri

ting,

num

erac

y an

d la

ngua

ge.

Wor

k ex

peri

ence

Th

e in

divi

dual

will

hav

e in

dust

rial

and

wor

king

life

exp

erie

nce

rele

vant

to th

e bu

sine

ss a

nd w

orkp

lace

bei

ng a

udite

d.

Aud

itor

trai

ning

• Th

e in

divi

dual

will

hav

e un

dert

aken

and

suc

cess

fully

com

plet

ed a

cou

rse

or c

ours

es in

rela

tion

to s

peci

fic s

tand

ards

, cod

es

or c

onve

ntion

s.•

The

indi

vidu

al w

ill h

ave

unde

rtak

en a

nd s

ucce

ssfu

lly c

ompl

eted

cou

rses

whi

ch im

part

kno

wle

dge

of e

ffecti

ve a

uditi

ng s

kills

/ m

etho

dolo

gy a

nd o

ther

ski

lls e

.g. i

nves

tigati

ve a

nd a

naly

tical

ski

lls.

The

indi

vidu

al w

ill u

nder

take

add

ition

al tr

aini

ng in

the

even

t tha

t the

re is

a c

hang

e to

legi

slati

on, s

peci

fic s

tand

ards

, cod

es

or c

onve

ntion

s.

Aud

it e

xper

ienc

e (a

udit

or)

• Th

e in

divi

dual

will

initi

ally

hav

e co

mpl

eted

a m

inim

um o

f 25

days

of o

nsite

aud

its (e

ither

for

soci

al c

ompl

ianc

e or

env

ironm

enta

l co

mpl

ianc

e ) u

nder

the

dire

ction

and

gui

danc

e of

a c

ompe

tent

lead

aud

itor.

• Th

e in

divi

dual

will

hav

e un

dert

aken

at l

east

two

satis

fact

ory

audi

ts fo

rmal

ly a

sses

sed

by a

com

pete

nt le

ad a

udito

r.

9. T

he e

xpec

ted

role

of a

n au

dito

r and

the

exte

nt to

whi

ch h

e or

she

will

be

aske

d to

adv

ise

the

supp

liers

on

how

to m

eet r

equi

rem

ents

will

dep

end

on th

e ar

rang

emen

ts b

etw

een

the

audi

tor a

nd th

e au

dit r

eque

stor

.

INTR

OD

UC

TIO

NCO

RE

PRIN

CIPL

ES

REQ

UIR

EMEN

TS

ALE

RTS

A

PPEA

LSCO

MPL

AIN

TS

FRA

UD

PR

EVEN

TIO

NEX

TER

NA

L CH

ALL

ENG

EG

LOSS

AR

Y –

AU

DIT

OR

CO

MPE

TEN

CE

G

LOSS

AR

Y -

GEN

ERA

LA

PPEN

DIX

1

GLOBAL SOCIAL COMPLIANCE PROGRAMME_15

REFERENCE TOOL FOR AUDITING COMPETENCE - VERSION 2 / OCTOBER 2014

Acti

on p

lann

ing/

advi

ceTh

e in

divi

dual

will

hav

e th

e ca

pabi

lity

to a

dvis

e on

way

s to

effe

ctive

ly re

solv

e no

n‐co

nfor

miti

es in

a p

racti

cal w

ay th

at m

eets

th

e re

quire

men

ts o

f rel

evan

t sta

ndar

ds w

hen

appr

opri

ate

and

with

in th

e sc

ope

of c

usto

mer

s ex

pect

ation

s9 .

Det

ecti

on s

kills

• Th

e in

divi

dual

will

hav

e kn

owle

dge

and

inve

stiga

tive

skill

s to

det

ect n

on‐c

onfo

rmiti

es w

hich

may

hav

e be

en s

ubje

ct to

m

anip

ulati

ve p

racti

ces

by th

e au

dite

e or

any

oth

er s

ourc

es to

pre

vent

det

ectio

n.•

The

indi

vidu

al w

ill h

ave

the

inve

stiga

tive

skill

s to

det

erm

ine

the

auth

entic

ity o

f inf

orm

ation

and

to v

erify

pos

sibl

e al

lega

tions

m

ade

by o

ther

sou

rces

.

Ana

lyti

cal s

kills

The

indi

vidu

al w

ill e

ffecti

vely

and

sys

tem

atica

lly a

sses

s si

tuati

ons

and

info

rmati

on to

mak

e in

form

ed d

ecis

ions

on

obje

ctive

an

d ve

rifia

ble

evid

ence

.

Inte

rper

sona

l ski

lls•

The

indi

vidu

al w

ill h

ave

skill

s to

ens

ure

effec

tive

com

mun

icati

on b

etw

een

them

selv

es a

nd o

ther

peo

ple.

• Th

e in

divi

dual

will

hav

e go

od p

eopl

e m

anag

emen

t ski

lls.

• Th

e in

divi

dual

will

hav

e go

od c

omm

unic

ation

ski

lls in

rela

tion

to a

situ

ation

whi

ch w

arra

nts

care

ful i

nfor

mati

on g

athe

ring

suc

h as

is

sues

rela

ting

to g

ende

r, ra

ce, c

ultu

re, p

ossi

ble

disc

rim

inati

on a

nd w

orke

r/m

anag

emen

t dis

pute

.

Educ

ation

The

indi

vidu

al w

ill h

ave

succ

essf

ully

com

plet

ed e

duca

tion

to d

egre

e le

vel o

r de

mon

stra

te e

quiv

alen

t exp

erie

nce

to c

ompl

y w

ith

the

pers

onal

ski

lls re

quire

men

ts o

f thi

s do

cum

ent,

i.e.

read

ing,

wri

ting,

num

erac

y an

d la

ngua

ge.

Wor

k ex

peri

ence

Th

e in

divi

dual

will

hav

e in

dust

rial

and

wor

king

life

exp

erie

nce

rele

vant

to th

e bu

sine

ss a

nd w

orkp

lace

bei

ng a

udite

d.

Aud

itor

trai

ning

• Th

e in

divi

dual

will

hav

e un

dert

aken

and

suc

cess

fully

com

plet

ed a

cou

rse

or c

ours

es in

rela

tion

to s

peci

fic s

tand

ards

, cod

es

or c

onve

ntion

s.•

The

indi

vidu

al w

ill h

ave

unde

rtak

en a

nd s

ucce

ssfu

lly c

ompl

eted

cou

rses

whi

ch im

part

kno

wle

dge

of e

ffecti

ve a

uditi

ng s

kills

/ m

etho

dolo

gy a

nd o

ther

ski

lls e

.g. i

nves

tigati

ve a

nd a

naly

tical

ski

lls.

The

indi

vidu

al w

ill u

nder

take

add

ition

al tr

aini

ng in

the

even

t tha

t the

re is

a c

hang

e to

legi

slati

on, s

peci

fic s

tand

ards

, cod

es

or c

onve

ntion

s.

Aud

it e

xper

ienc

e (a

udit

or)

• Th

e in

divi

dual

will

initi

ally

hav

e co

mpl

eted

a m

inim

um o

f 25

days

of o

nsite

aud

its (e

ither

for

soci

al c

ompl

ianc

e or

env

ironm

enta

l co

mpl

ianc

e ) u

nder

the

dire

ction

and

gui

danc

e of

a c

ompe

tent

lead

aud

itor.

• Th

e in

divi

dual

will

hav

e un

dert

aken

at l

east

two

satis

fact

ory

audi

ts fo

rmal

ly a

sses

sed

by a

com

pete

nt le

ad a

udito

r.

Tabl

e B

- Spe

cific

lead

aud

itor

com

pete

nce

and

prer

equi

site

refe

renc

e re

quir

emen

ts

(for

soc

ial a

nd e

nvir

onm

enta

l com

plia

nce

asse

ssm

ent)

In

add

ition

to th

e re

quire

men

ts o

f tab

le A

, lea

d au

dito

rs s

hall

poss

ess

the

follo

win

g co

mpe

tenc

ies.

COM

PETE

NCY

/ PR

EREQ

UIS

ITE

REQ

UIR

EMEN

T

Gen

eric

kno

wle

dge

and

skill

s

of le

ad a

udit

ors

The

indi

vidu

al w

ill le

ad a

n au

dit t

eam

and

will

:/

plan

the

audi

t and

mak

e eff

ectiv

e us

e of

reso

urce

s du

ring

the

audi

t;/

sele

ct a

ppro

pria

te c

ompe

tent

aud

it te

am m

embe

rs w

ith d

ue re

gard

to th

e kn

owle

dge

and

skill

s of

indi

vidu

al a

udit

team

mem

bers

; /

repr

esen

t the

aud

it te

am in

com

mun

icati

ons

with

the

audi

tee

and

othe

r int

eres

ted

parti

es;

/ or

gani

se, d

irect

and

man

age

audi

t tea

m m

embe

rs b

oth

durin

g an

d aft

er th

e au

dit;

/ pr

ovid

e di

recti

on a

nd g

uida

nce

to a

udito

rs in

trai

ning

;/

lead

the

audi

t tea

m to

reac

h co

nclu

sion

s;/

have

ski

lls fo

r pre

venti

ng a

nd re

solv

ing

confl

icts

;/

prep

are

and

com

plet

e th

e au

dit r

epor

t;/

have

an

unde

rsta

ndin

g of

all

disc

iplin

es w

ithin

the

scop

e of

the

audi

t (fo

r exa

mpl

e so

cial

com

plia

nce

and

envi

ronm

ent)

.

Aud

it e

xper

ienc

e (le

ad a

udit

or)

• Th

e in

divi

dual

will

initi

ally

hav

e co

mpl

eted

a m

inim

um o

f 2 y

ears

exp

erie

nce

cond

uctin

g at

leas

t 25

days

of o

nsite

aud

its (e

ither

for

soci

al o

r env

ironm

enta

l com

plia

nce)

und

er th

e di

recti

on a

nd g

uida

nce

of a

com

pete

nt le

ad a

udito

r.•

The

indi

vidu

al w

ill h

ave

unde

rtak

en a

t lea

st tw

o sa

tisfa

ctor

y au

dits

at d

iffer

ent s

ites

as a

n ac

ting

audi

t tea

m le

ader

, for

mal

ly a

sses

sed

by a

com

pete

nt le

ad a

udito

r.

INTR

OD

UC

TION

COR

E PRIN

CIPLES R

EQU

IREM

ENTS

ALER

TS A

PPEALS

COM

PLAIN

TS FR

AU

D PR

EVEN

TION

EXTER

NA

L CH

ALLEN

GE

GLO

SSAR

Y – AU

DITO

R

COM

PETENCE

G

LOSSA

RY -

GEN

ERA

LA

PPEND

IX 1

16_GLOBAL SOCIAL COMPLIANCE PROGRAMME

REFERENCE TOOL FOR AUDITING COMPETENCE - VERSION 2 / OCTOBER 2014

Tabl

e C

- Spe

cific

aud

itor a

nd le

ad a

udito

r com

pete

nce

and

prer

equi

site

refe

renc

e re

quire

men

ts -

soci

al c

ompl

ianc

e as

sess

men

t

COM

PETE

NCY

/ PR

EREQ

UIS

ITE

REQ

UIR

EMEN

T

Spec

ific

know

ledg

e an

d sk

ills

of

soc

ial c

ompl

ianc

e au

dito

rs

and

lead

aud

itor

s - r

elat

ed

met

hods

and

tech

niqu

es

The

indi

vidu

al w

ill h

ave

deta

iled

know

ledg

e an

d sk

ills

in re

latio

n to

:/

soci

al c

ompl

ianc

e te

rmin

olog

y;/

heal

th a

nd s

afet

y te

rmin

olog

y;/

audi

t man

agem

ent p

rinci

ples

and

thei

r app

licati

on;

/ au

dit m

anag

emen

t too

ls a

nd th

eir a

pplic

ation

.

Spec

ific

know

ledg

e an

d sk

ills

of

soc

ial c

ompl

ianc

e au

dito

rs

and

lead

aud

itor

s - p

roce

sses

an

d pr

oduc

ts, i

nclu

ding

ser

vice

s

The

indi

vidu

al w

ill h

ave

deta

iled

know

ledg

e an

d sk

ills

in re

latio

n to

:/

the

wor

king

env

ironm

ent;

/

sect

or s

peci

fic te

rmin

olog

y;

/ te

chni

cal c

hara

cter

istic

s of

pro

cess

and

pro

duct

s;/

sect

or s

peci

fic p

roce

sses

, pra

ctice

s an

d sy

stem

s;/

risk

asse

ssm

ent t

echn

ique

s;

/ he

alth

and

saf

ety

risks

ass

ocia

ted

with

the

tech

nica

l cha

ract

eris

tics

of p

roce

ss a

nd p

rodu

cts;

/ m

anuf

actu

ring

envi

ronm

ent s

ecto

r spe

cific

term

inol

ogy;

/

sect

or s

peci

fic p

roce

sses

, pra

ctice

s an

d sy

stem

s.

Conti

nual

pro

fess

iona

l de

velo

pmen

tTh

e in

divi

dual

will

und

erta

ke a

pro

gram

me

of c

ontin

ual p

rofe

ssio

nal d

evel

opm

ent w

hich

will

incl

ude:

/ a

form

al p

erfo

rman

ce re

view

aga

inst

a p

rede

term

ined

per

sona

l dev

elop

men

t pla

n;/

invo

lvem

ent w

ith S

ocia

l Com

plia

nce

activ

ities

as

a si

gnifi

cant

pro

porti

on o

f the

ir w

ork

(typ

ical

ly a

third

of t

heir

full

time

activ

ity);

/ be

ass

esse

d un

der s

hado

w a

sses

smen

t con

ditio

ns (o

ne p

er y

ear)

by

an e

xper

ienc

ed c

ompe

tent

lead

aud

itor;

/ att

end

rele

vant

brie

fing

or tr

aini

ng s

essi

ons

in re

latio

n to

legi

slati

ve re

quire

men

ts, s

tand

ards

, cod

es o

f pra

ctice

s, in

tern

ation

al

conv

entio

ns a

nd re

leva

nt k

now

ledg

e an

d sk

ills.

INTR

OD

UC

TIO

NCO

RE

PRIN

CIPL

ES

REQ

UIR

EMEN

TS

ALE

RTS

A

PPEA

LSCO

MPL

AIN

TS

FRA

UD

PR

EVEN

TIO

NEX

TER

NA

L CH

ALL

ENG

EG

LOSS

AR

Y –

AU

DIT

OR

CO

MPE

TEN

CE

G

LOSS

AR

Y -

GEN

ERA

LA

PPEN

DIX

1

GLOBAL SOCIAL COMPLIANCE PROGRAMME_17

REFERENCE TOOL FOR AUDITING COMPETENCE - VERSION 2 / OCTOBER 2014

Tabl

e D

- Sp

ecifi

c au

dito

r and

lead

aud

itor c

ompe

tenc

e an

d pr

ereq

uisi

te re

fere

nce

requ

irem

ents

- en

viro

nmen

tal c

ompl

ianc

e as

sess

men

t

COM

PETE

NCY

/ PR

EREQ

UIS

ITE

REQ

UIR

EMEN

T

Spec

ific

know

ledg

e an

d sk

ills

of

EM

S au

dito

rs a

nd le

ad a

udit

ors

- env

iron

men

tal m

anag

emen

t m

etho

ds a

nd te

chni

ques

The

indi

vidu

al w

ill h

ave

a de

taile

d kn

owle

dge

and

skill

s in

rela

tion

to:

/ en

viro

nmen

tal t

erm

inol

ogy;

/ en

viro

nmen

tal m

anag

emen

t prin

cipl

es a

nd th

eir a

pplic

ation

;/

envi

ronm

enta

l man

agem

ent t

ools

and

thei

r app

licati

on.

Spec

ific

know

ledg

e an

d sk

ills

of

EM

S au

dito

rs a

nd le

ad a

udito

rs -

en

viro

nmen

tal s

cien

ce a

nd

tech

nolo

gy

The

indi

vidu

al w

ill h

ave

in d

epth

kno

wle

dge

and

skill

s to

und

erst

and

the

fund

amen

tal r

elati

onsh

ips

betw

een

hum

an a

ctivi

ties

and

the

envi

ronm

ent w

ith p

artic

ular

refe

renc

e to

:/

the

impa

ct o

f hum

an a

ctivi

ties

on th

e en

viro

nmen

t;/

inte

racti

on o

f eco

syst

ems;

/ en

viro

nmen

tal m

edia

(air,

wat

er, l

and)

;/

man

agem

ent o

f nat

ural

reso

urce

s;/

gene

ral m

etho

ds o

f env

ironm

enta

l pro

tecti

on.

Spec

ific

know

ledg

e an

d sk

ills

of

EM

S au

dito

rs a

nd le

ad a

udito

rs -

te

chni

cal a

nd e

nvir

onm

enta

l as

pect

s of

ope

rati

ons

The

indi

vidu

al w

ill h

ave

the

know

ledg

e an

d sk

ills

to u

nder

stan

d th

e in

tera

ction

of a

udite

e’s

activ

ities

, pro

duct

s, s

ervi

ces,

and

ope

ra-

tions

with

the

envi

ronm

ent,

with

par

ticul

ar re

fere

nce

to:

/ se

ctor

spe

cific

term

inol

ogy;

/ en

viro

nmen

tal a

spec

ts a

nd im

pact

s;/

met

hods

for e

valu

ating

the

sign

ifica

nce

of e

nviro

nmen

tal a

spec

ts;

/ cr

itica

l cha

ract

eris

tics

of o

pera

tiona

l pro

cess

es, p

rodu

cts

and

serv

ices

;/

mon

itorin

g an

d m

easu

rem

ent t

echn

ique

s;/

tech

nolo

gies

for t

he p

reve

ntion

of p

ollu

tion.

Conti

nual

pro

fess

iona

l de

velo

pmen

tTh

e in

divi

dual

will

und

erta

ke a

pro

gram

me

of c

ontin

ual p

rofe

ssio

nal d

evel

opm

ent,

whi

ch w

ill in

clud

e;/

a fo

rmal

per

form

ance

revi

ew a

gain

st a

pre

dete

rmin

ed p

erso

nal d

evel

opm

ent p

lan;

/ in

volv

emen

t with

Env

ironm

enta

l Com

plia

nce

activ

ities

as

a si

gnifi

cant

pro

porti

on o

f the

ir w

ork

(typ

ical

ly a

third

of t

heir

full

time

activ

ity);

/ be

ass

esse

d un

der s

hado

w a

sses

smen

t con

ditio

ns (o

ne p

er y

ear)

by

an e

xper

ienc

ed c

ompe

tent

lead

aud

itor;

/ att

end

rele

vant

brie

fing

or tr

aini

ng s

essi

ons

in re

latio

n to

legi

slati

ve re

quire

men

ts, s

tand

ards

, cod

es o

f pra

ctice

s, in

tern

ation

al

conv

entio

ns a

nd re

leva

nt k

now

ledg

e an

d sk

ills.

INTR

OD

UC

TION

COR

E PRIN

CIPLES R

EQU

IREM

ENTS

ALER

TS A

PPEALS

COM

PLAIN

TS FR

AU

D PR

EVEN

TION

EXTER

NA

L CH

ALLEN

GE

GLO

SSAR

Y – AU

DITO

R

COM

PETENCE

G

LOSSA

RY -

GEN

ERA

LA

PPEND

IX 1

18_GLOBAL SOCIAL COMPLIANCE PROGRAMME

Glossary of terms Auditor competence

AAction planning/advice

The auditor shall have knowledge to develop effective advice and action plans to ensure an auditee fully understands actions and timescales required for compliance with requirements.

Analytical skills

The auditor shall have knowledge and skills to effectively and systematically assess situations and/or information in order to make informed decisions.

Applicable laws, regulations and other requirements relevant to the discipline

The ability to comprehend and understand the requirements that apply to the organisation being audited with particular reference to:

• local, regional and national codes, law and regulations;

• contracts and agreements;

• international treaties and conventions;

• other specific requirements to which the organisation subscribes.

Audit principles, procedures and techniques

The ability to:

• apply audit principles, procedures and techniques;

• plan and organise work effectively;

• conduct the audit within the agreed time schedule;

• prioritise and focus on matters of significance;

• collect information through effective interviewing listening, observing and reviewing documents, records and data;

• understand the appropriateness and consequences of using sampling techniques for auditing;

• verify the accuracy of collected information;

• confirm the sufficiency and appropriateness of audit evidence to support audit findings and conclusions;

• assess those factors that can affect the reliability of the audit findings and conclusions;

• use work documents to record audit activities;

• prepare audit reports;

• maintain the confidentiality and security of information;

• communicate effectively, either through linguistic skills or through an interpreter.

DDecisive

The ability to reach timely conclusions based on logical reasoning and analysis.

Detection skills

The auditor shall have knowledge and skills to effectively detect and provide objective evidence of non conformance against requirements.

Diplomatic

The ability to be tactful in dealing with people.

EEthical

The ability to be fair, truthful, sincere, honest and discreet.

INTR

OD

UC

TIO

NCO

RE

PRIN

CIPL

ES

REQ

UIR

EMEN

TS

ALE

RTS

A

PPEA

LSCO

MPL

AIN

TS

FRA

UD

PR

EVEN

TIO

NEX

TER

NA

L CH

ALL

ENG

EA

PPEN

DIX

1

GLO

SSA

RY

– A

UD

ITO

R

COM

PETE

NCE

G

LOSS

AR

Y -

GEN

ERA

L

GLOBAL SOCIAL COMPLIANCE PROGRAMME_19

REFERENCE TOOL FOR AUDITING COMPETENCE - VERSION 2 / OCTOBER 2014

Ethically and morally courageous

The ability to act responsibly and ethically even though these actions may not always be popular and may sometimes result in disagreement or confrontation.

FFacilitating meetings

The ability to effectively manage and control meetings.

Fraud detection

The auditor shall have knowledge to understand and detect fraudulent actions and information.

GGeneric knowledge and skills of Lead Auditors

The ability to lead an audit team with particular reference to:

• planning the audit and make effective use of resources during the audit;

• representing the audit team in communications with the auditee;

• organising, directing and managing audit team members;

• providing direction and guidance to auditors in training;

• lead the audit team to reach conclusions;

• prevent and resolve conflicts;

• prepare and complete the audit report.

IInterpersonal skills

The auditor shall have skills to promote effective communication between themselves and other people.

Interviewing

The ability to effectively ask questions to obtain specific information themselves or the ability to ask questions and obtain specific information by managing an interviewer or a translator.

LLanguage

The auditor shall have knowledge of a specific language, both written and verbal, in order to effectively undertake an audit.

Listening

The ability to understand and interpret verbal material and to apply what they have understood to specific situations.

Logical Judgement

The ability to make correct decisions using evidence and information.

MManagement systems and reference documents

The ability to comprehend:

• the application of management systems to different organisations;

• the interaction between components of the management system;

• quality or safety or environmental management systems standards, applicable procedures or other management systems documents used as audit criteria;

• the differences between and priority of reference documents;

• the application of reference documents to different audit situations;

• information systems and technology for authorisation, security, distribution and control of documents, data and records.

NNumeracy

The ability to understand and interpret number systems and to apply what they have understood to specific situations.

Numeracy also demands practical understanding of the ways in which information is gathered by counting and measuring, and is presented in graphs, diagrams, charts and tables.

INTR

OD

UC

TION

COR

E PRIN

CIPLES R

EQU

IREM

ENTS

ALER

TS A

PPEALS

COM

PLAIN

TS FR

AU

D PR

EVEN

TION

EXTER

NA

L CH

ALLEN

GE

APPEN

DIX 1

GLO

SSAR

Y – AU

DITO

R

COM

PETENCE

G

LOSSA

RY -

GEN

ERA

L

20_GLOBAL SOCIAL COMPLIANCE PROGRAMME

REFERENCE TOOL FOR AUDITING COMPETENCE - VERSION 2 / OCTOBER 2014

OObservant

The ability to be actively aware of physical surroundings and activities.

Open-minded

The ability to be willing to consider alternative ideas or points of view.

Oral presentation

The ability to effectively communicate verbally with a specific audience.

Organisational situations

The ability to comprehend:

• the organisations size, structure, functions and relationships;

• general business processes and related terminology;

• cultural and social customs of the auditee.

Organisational skills

The ability to be able to effectively manage time and tasks, to be able to prioritise, plan and be efficient.

PPerceptive

The ability to be instinctively aware of and be able to understand situations.

Professional

The ability to be courteous, conscientious and be generally business like in demeanour in the workplace.

RReading

The ability to understand and interpret written material and to apply what they have understood to specific situations.

SSelf-reliant

The ability to act and function independently while interacting effectively with others.

Specific knowledge and skills of EMS auditors - Environmental science and technology

The auditor shall have the knowledge and skills to comprehend the fundamental relationships between human activities and the environment, with particular reference to:

• the impact of human activities on the environment;

• interaction of ecosystems;

• environmental media (air, water, land);

• management of natural resources;

• general methods of environmental protection.

Specific knowledge and skills of environmental compliance auditors - Related methods and techniques

The auditor shall have knowledge and skills in these specific areas:

• environmental terminology;

• environmental audit principles and their application;

• environmental audit tools and their application.

Specific knowledge and skills of Environmental Compliance auditors - Technical and environmental aspects of operations

The auditor shall have the knowledge and skills to comprehend the interaction of auditee’s activities, products, services, and operations with the environment, with particular reference to:

• sector specific terminology;

• technical characteristics of operations;

• sector specific processes and practices;

• environmental aspects and impacts;

• methods for evaluating the significance of environmental aspects;

• critical characteristics of operational processes, products and services;

• monitoring and measurement techniques;

• technologies for the prevention of pollution.

INTR

OD

UC

TIO

NCO

RE

PRIN

CIPL

ES

REQ

UIR

EMEN

TS

ALE

RTS

A

PPEA

LSCO

MPL

AIN

TS

FRA

UD

PR

EVEN

TIO

NEX

TER

NA

L CH

ALL

ENG

EA

PPEN

DIX

1

GLO

SSA

RY

– A

UD

ITO

R

COM

PETE

NCE

G

LOSS

AR

Y -

GEN

ERA

L

GLOBAL SOCIAL COMPLIANCE PROGRAMME_21

REFERENCE TOOL FOR AUDITING COMPETENCE - VERSION 2 / OCTOBER 2014

Specific knowledge and skills of social compliance auditors - Processes and products, including services

The auditor shall have knowledge and skills in these specific areas:

• sector specific terminology;

• technical characteristics of process and products;

• sector specific processes and practices.

Specific knowledge and skills of social compliance auditors- related methods and techniques

The auditor shall have knowledge and skills in these specific areas:

• social compliance and Health & Safety terminology;

• social audit principles and their application;

• social audit tools and their application.

TTenacious

The ability to be persistent and focused on achieving objectives.

VVersatile

The ability to be able to adjust readily to different situations.

WWriting

The ability to produce written communication in print and electronic environments which will be understood by the intended audience.

INTR

OD

UC

TION

COR

E PRIN

CIPLES R

EQU

IREM

ENTS

ALER

TS A

PPEALS

COM

PLAIN

TS FR

AU

D PR

EVEN

TION

EXTER

NA

L CH

ALLEN

GE

APPEN

DIX 1

GLO

SSAR

Y – AU

DITO

R

COM

PETENCE

G

LOSSA

RY -

GEN

ERA

L

22_GLOBAL SOCIAL COMPLIANCE PROGRAMME

Glossary of terms General

AAudit

A systematic and functionally independent and documented process used to determine whether activities and related results comply with a standard or series of requirements which results in an audit report.

Audit administrator

A person who is an employee of an auditing body and is involved with administration of the auditing process.

Audit requestor

A person and/or legal entity that has requested and commissioned an audit, including the requesting entity’s customers (where known) where agreements allowing disclosure are in place.

Audit reviewer

A person who is employee of an auditing body and is responsible for the review of audit reports and findings.

Audit team

One or more auditors conducting an audit supported if needed by technical experts.

Auditee

An organisation that is responsible for ensuring that requirements of a standard are met and continue to be met, on which the audit is based.

Auditing body

A person and /or legal entity that performs auditing services.

Auditing bodies include:

• companies/organisations;

• audit teams from buying/sourcing companies that are demonstrably independent of the company’s commercial functions;

• industry or sector schemes and multi‐stakeholder initiatives.

Auditor

A person with the competence to conduct an audit.

CClient

A person and/or organisation for which the auditing process is undertaken and to whom the auditing body has a contract or agreement.

Complaint

An expression of dissatisfaction, however made, about the standard of service, actions or lack of action by an auditor or an organisation or its staff affecting an individual customer or a group of customers.

Critical non-compliance

• An issue which presents imminent risk to workers’ safety/risk to life and limb or constitutes a significant breach of workers’ human rights, and/or

• a major non‐compliance that has not been addressed or for which no significant improvement has been made by the time of a follow up audit, in spite of supplier commitment to resolve the issue, and/or

INTR

OD

UC

TIO

NCO

RE

PRIN

CIPL

ES

REQ

UIR

EMEN

TS

ALE

RTS

A

PPEA

LSCO

MPL

AIN

TS

FRA

UD

PR

EVEN

TIO

NEX

TER

NA

L CH

ALL

ENG

EA

PPEN

DIX

1

GLO

SSA

RY

– A

UD

ITO

R

COM

PETE

NCE

G

LOSS

AR

Y -

GEN

ERA

L

GLOBAL SOCIAL COMPLIANCE PROGRAMME_23

REFERENCE TOOL FOR AUDITING COMPETENCE - VERSION 2 / OCTOBER 2014

• an attempt to pervert the course of the audit through fraud, coercion, deception or interference, and/or

• a breach which represents imminent risk of serious or significant impact to the environment (e.g. major damage to a local ecosystem, closure of a potable water abstraction point, known on‐site or off‐site impact to soil, groundwater or surface water).

EEnvironment

The totality of circumstances surrounding an organism or group of organisms, especially:

a. the combination of external physical conditions that affect and influence the growth, development, and survival of organisms;

b. the complex of social and cultural conditions affecting the nature of an individual or community.

External audit

An audit carried out by any individual or organisation not affiliated with the organisation that is the object of the audit.

FFirst party audit

An internal audit that an organisation performs on itself to evaluate conformity with procedures and a standard.

IIndependent

A person or organisation who is free from external control, influence, guidance or constraint of the organisation being audited.

Interpreter

A person who mediates between speakers of different languages by translating orally or in written form from one language into another.

KKnowledge

Familiarity, awareness, and understanding gained through experience and/or formal training/education.

LLead auditor

The auditor of the audit team appointed as audit team leader and is responsible for leading the audit team.

Legal entity

Any entity recognised by the law, including both juristic and natural persons.

MMajor non-compliance

• A breach which represents a danger to workers / those on‐site, and/or

• a material breach of a code requirement / law, and/or

• a systematic violation of a code requirement / law, and/or

• a breach which represents a danger to the local environment.

Minor non-compliance

• An occasional or isolated problem, and/or

• an issue which presents a low risk to workers / those onsite, and/or

• a policy issue or misunderstanding where there is no evidence of a material breach, and/or

• an issue which presents a low risk to the environment.

NNon-compliance

Non‐compliance refers to a failure to comply with requirements. A requirement is a need, expectation, or obligation. It can be stated or implied by an Organisation, its customers, or other interested parties.

INTR

OD

UC

TION

COR

E PRIN

CIPLES R

EQU

IREM

ENTS

ALER

TS A

PPEALS

COM

PLAIN

TS FR

AU

D PR

EVEN

TION

EXTER

NA

L CH

ALLEN

GE

APPEN

DIX 1

GLO

SSAR

Y – AU

DITO

R

COM

PETENCE

G

LOSSA

RY -

GEN

ERA

L

24_GLOBAL SOCIAL COMPLIANCE PROGRAMME

REFERENCE TOOL FOR AUDITING COMPETENCE - VERSION 2 / OCTOBER 2014

OOccupational Health and Safety or OHS (Auditing standard)

An organisation’s activities that relate to worker occupational safety and health.

PProfessional integrity

Companies/organisations are required to establish policies and procedures assuring that personnel maintain independence (in fact and appearance) in all required circumstances; perform all professional responsibilities with integrity, and maintain objectivity while performing those responsibilities10.

SSecond party audit

An external audit that an organisation (typically a customer of that site) performs on a supplier of product or services to evaluate conformity with procedures and a standard.

Secondary education

The elementary stage of a national educational system and is completed prior to entrance to a university or similar educational institution.

Shadow assessment /audit

An assessment in which an auditor is observed, usually by an experienced lead auditor to confirm their competence by demonstrating the application of knowledge and skills to achieve a desired result.

Social accountability

The measure of an organisation’s state of being mindful of the emerging social issues and concerns. The organisation’s commitment to its activity in relation to certain issues such as:

1) willing compliance with employment, hygiene, safety and environment laws;

2) respect for basic civil and human rights;

3) betterment of community and surrounding.

Social compliance

Alignment with applicable laws, regulations and standards, including those contained in the organisation’s supplier ethical code of conduct and also alignment with the expectations of stakeholders.

Sub-contractor

A person and/ or legal entity that is contracted / appointed to completely or partially carry out any steps in the auditing process.

TTechnical audit review

The process of reviewing audit reports to check the integrity of the audit process and the correct completion of required documentation.

Technical expert

A person who provides specific knowledge or expertise to the audit team but does not act as an auditor.

Third party audit

An external audit that is conducted by an independent organisation upon another organisation to evaluate conformity with procedures and a standard.

WWitness assessment/audit

An assessment/audit in which an auditor is observed performing a task, or series of tasks by relevant and appropriate organisations, including but not limited to accreditation agencies, NGOs and trade unions for the explicit purposes of learning, rather than to confirm competence of the observed auditor (see Shadow assessment / audit).

10. Independence, integrity and objectivity are described in more detail in the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct and AICPA Professional Standards AU §220, Independence. http://www.reyhl.com/peer_review/glossary.html#independence.

INTR

OD

UC

TIO

NCO

RE

PRIN

CIPL

ES

REQ

UIR

EMEN

TS

ALE

RTS

A

PPEA

LSCO

MPL

AIN

TS

FRA

UD

PR

EVEN

TIO

NEX

TER

NA

L CH

ALL

ENG

EA

PPEN

DIX

1

GLO

SSA

RY

– A

UD

ITO

R

COM

PETE

NCE

G

LOSS

AR

Y -

GEN

ERA

L

GLOBAL SOCIAL COMPLIANCE PROGRAMME_25

The GSCP is facilitated byThe Consumer Goods Forum

22/24 rue du Gouverneur Gal Eboué92130 Issy‐les‐Moulineaux

France

www.gscpnet.com [email protected]