re˚ective cloth field trial - proline products...colorit re˚ective cloth was compared with an...

1
Reflective Cloth Field Trial ColorIt reflective cloth was compared with an untreated control for varying intervals. Fruit coloration measured at the start of harvest was significantly increased in all varieties. The proportion of the crop below 40% coloration was significantly reduced and the proportion above 70% was significantly increased by the cloth treatments. This response is illustrated using the variety Fuji as an example (Figure 1). Factors affecting response A number of factors influence the response to ColorIt reflective cloth: Variety - Each variety responds differently. Duration - Optimal benefit for fruit color development usually takes 2-3 weeks for most blocks and varieties. If duration is too short, response may be disappointing. On the other hand, little extra benefit may be gained from long duration and gains from shifting to other blocks could be missed. Sunshine - There is a marked seasonal decline in sunshine duration and energy over the course of the apple harvest. This means that later season varieties require more time to receive equivalent sunshine energy than early ones. Cloudy weather also affects response. Tree size - More light is reflected by the cloth in smaller, dwarf trees while larger canopies intercept more light and reduce what is available to be reflected back. Typically, larger trees require more time to get a similar response to smaller trees. An independent replicated orchard trial to measure apple fruit coloration and maturity responses to reflective cloth was carried out in commercial Hawke’s Bay orchards during the 2014 season by Fruition Horticulture (HB) Limited. Treatment details and responses from the 2014 trial work were: Figure 1: Distribution of fruit blush coverage at start of harvest in standard Fuji Blush coverage category (%) Fidelity 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Control ColorIt VARIETY TREATMENT DURATION CONTROL CLOTH COLOR INCREASE CHANGE IN % OF CROP IN THE FOLLOWING COLOR BANDS WITH COLORIT REFLECTIVE CLOTH All standard clones Number of days cloth was under trees before assessment and start of harvest Treatment means Treatment means apple % color coverage assessed before harvest Less than 40% 70% or more Royal Gala 23 48% 57% +9% -10% +18% Jazz 11 35% 56% +21% -33% +30% Fuji 30 39% 50% +10% -19% +16% Pink Lady 11 39% 44% +5% -9% +8% We are committed to ongoing product development and improvement so growers can gain more from using ColorIt Proline Products USA Inc. 2003 Ahtanum Rd. Yakima, WA 98903 Phone: (509) 367 3533 Email: [email protected]

Upload: others

Post on 29-Sep-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Re˚ective Cloth Field Trial - Proline Products...ColorIt re˚ective cloth was compared with an untreated control for varying intervals. Fruit coloration measured at the start of harvest

Re�ective Cloth Field Trial

ColorIt re�ective cloth was compared with an untreated control for varying intervals. Fruit coloration measured at the start of harvest was signi�cantly increased in all varieties.

The proportion of the crop below 40% coloration was signi�cantly reduced and the proportion above 70% was signi�cantly increased by the cloth treatments. This response is illustrated using the variety Fuji as an example (Figure 1).

Factors a�ecting responseA number of factors in�uence the response to ColorIt re�ective cloth:Variety - Each variety responds di�erently.Duration - Optimal bene�t for fruit color development usually takes 2-3 weeks for most blocks and varieties. If duration is too short, response may be disappointing. On the other hand, little extra bene�t may be gained from long duration and gains from shifting to other blocks could be missed.Sunshine - There is a marked seasonal decline in sunshine duration and energy over the course of the apple harvest. This means that later season varieties require more time to receive equivalent sunshine energy than early ones. Cloudy weather also a�ects response.Tree size - More light is re�ected by the cloth in smaller, dwarf trees while larger canopies intercept more light and reduce what is available to be re�ected back. Typically, larger trees require more time to get a similar response to smaller trees.

An independent replicated orchard trial to measure apple fruit coloration and maturity responses to re�ective cloth was carried out in commercial Hawke’s Bay orchards during the 2014 season by Fruition Horticulture (HB) Limited.

Treatment details and responses from the 2014 trial work were:

Figure 1: Distribution of fruit blush coverage at start of harvest in standard Fuji

Blush coverage category (%)

Fid

elit

y

35%

30%

25%

20%

15%

10%

5%

0%

ControlColorIt

VARIETY TREATMENT DURATION

CONTROL CLOTH COLOR INCREASE

CHANGE IN % OF CROP IN THE FOLLOWING COLOR BANDS WITH COLORIT REFLECTIVE CLOTH

All standard clones

Number of days cloth was under trees before assessment and start of harvest

Treatment means

Treatment means apple % color

coverage assessed before harvest

Less than 40% 70% or more

Royal Gala 23 48% 57% +9% -10% +18%

Jazz 11 35% 56% +21% -33% +30%

Fuji 30 39% 50% +10% -19% +16%

Pink Lady 11 39% 44% +5% -9% +8%

We are committed to ongoing product development and

improvement so growerscan gain more from

using ColorItProline Products USA Inc.2003 Ahtanum Rd. Yakima, WA 98903Phone: (509) 367 3533Email: [email protected]