recuperación de áreas degradadas e intensificación sostenible de sistemas silvoagropecuarios como...
TRANSCRIPT
Production Efficiency Models for Decision Support in Livestock
Production on PasturesProduction on Pastures
Luís Gustavo Barioni
Computacional Mathematics Laboratory
Embrapa Informática Agropecuária
Where are the most
efficient systems?
Where are there greatest
Are we efficient?
Which municipalities
could improve
production?Where are there greatest
opportunities for
production efficiency
improvement?
Can we produce what will
be demanded?Is our production
environmentally
efficient?
The Concept of Efficiency
Inputs Outputs
The efficiency concept is concerned with the
relationship of inputs and outputs of a system
System
Evaluating Efficiency
Inputs Outputs
Easy to evaluate when inputs and outputs are
of the same dimension
System100 W 70 W
Evaluating Efficiency
Inputs Outputs
Is compared with some reference value,
usually extremes (maximum or minimum)
System100 W 70 W
Max = 100W
Eff =70 W/100W = 0.7 = 70%
Evaluating Efficiency
Inputs Outputs
A production system is said to be efficient if it produces
maximum output for a given set of inputs
System
Given monetary value to the inputs, a production system is
efficient when cost per unit of output is minimum
Evaluating EfficiencyMaximum
Efficiency is always a comparative measure!
Optimal (or the most desirable possible outcome) is
always a good reference!
Production efficiency can be evaluated in relation to an
reference (optimal) extreme reference (optimal) extreme value!
Potential Stocking RatesWhere are the most
efficient systems?
Are we efficient?
Can we produce what
will be demanded?
IBGE, 2006
Stocking rate (hd/ha)
Stocking rate (hd/ha)
Where are there greatest
opportunities for
production efficiency
improvement?
Production Seasonality
AFD =3300 kg DM/ha
Production Seasonality
Max Sustainable Stocking Rate
1.4 UA/ha
AFD =2500 kg DM/ha
Max Sustainable Herbage Consumption
28 kg.ha-1.dia-1
Criteria
Production Efficiency
Inputs Outputs
EnvironmentManagement
System’s
Boundaries
Economic x Biological
Process-based models
Animais
Venda
Produtos
Compra e
Venda de
Animais
Photosynthesis
Solar Radiation
Pasture growth multiplier LAI
Day Length
and Temperature
Photosynthesis
Solar Radiation
Pasture growth multiplier LAI
Day Length
and Temperature
PhotosynthesisPhotosynthesis
Solar Radiation
Pasture growth multiplier LAI
Day Length
and Temperature
Subsistema BiofísicoSubsistema Biofísico
Pastagem
Solo
Pastejo
Absorção Decomposição
Pisoteio
Fezes e
UrinaLive Stem Dead Stem
Leaves above
growing pointLeaves below
growing point
(mature)
Dead Leaves
Dies (Grazing/tiller death caused by competition or
environmental stress/ senescence )
Dies (tiller death caused by competition or
environmental stress)
Decomp. Stems
Assimilates
Respiration
(maintenance,
growth)
Stem Growth Rate
Decomp. Leaves
Leaves Growth Rate
Stem elongation
Realocation of carbohydrates from dying leaves.
Senescence
Live Stem Dead Stem
Leaves above
growing pointLeaves below
growing point
(mature)
Dead Leaves
Dies (Grazing/tiller death caused by competition or
environmental stress/ senescence )
Dies (tiller death caused by competition or
environmental stress)
Decomp. Stems
Assimilates
Respiration
(maintenance,
growth)
Stem Growth Rate
Decomp. Leaves
Leaves Growth Rate
Stem elongation
Realocation of carbohydrates from dying leaves.
Senescence
Live Stem Dead Stem
Leaves above
growing pointLeaves below
growing point
(mature)
Dead Leaves
Dies (Grazing/tiller death caused by competition or
environmental stress/ senescence )
Dies (tiller death caused by competition or
environmental stress)
Decomp. Stems
Assimilates
Respiration
(maintenance,
growth)
Stem Growth Rate
Decomp. Leaves
Leaves Growth Rate
Stem elongation
Realocation of carbohydrates from dying leaves.
Senescence
Optimally managed systems
Mês
Nit
rogênio
ap
lica
do
(kg N
/ha)
Sup
lem
ento
Fo
rneci
do
(kg M
S)
Pes
o d
e V
end
a
(kg
)
Dis
po
nib
ilid
ade
diá
ria
de
Fo
rrag
em
(kg M
S/
uo
/d
ia)
Dis
po
nib
ilid
ade
em r
elaç
ão a
o
po
tenci
al d
e
ing
estã
o
Mas
sa p
ós-
pas
tejo
(kg M
S /
ha)
Mas
sa m
édia
de
forr
agem
(kg M
S/h
a)
Mar 0.0 0 - 2.67 2.15 1042 1461
Abr 12.5 0 - 2.17 2.00 994 1433
Mai 0.0 0 - 1.56 1.10 1130 1579
Barioni, L.G.; Dake, C.K.G.; Parker, W.J .
Environment International, 25(6-7), 1999
Jun 0.0 0 - 3.11 2.75 1155 1470
Jul 0.0 0 - 2.27 2.30 887 1204
Ago 50.0 0 - 1.60 1.25 914 1291
Set 0.0 0 - 2.78 2.00 1303 1753
Out 0.0 0 35 3.53 2.00 1712 2127
Nov 0.0 0 35 5.00 3.50 1881 2259
Dez 0.0 0 37 3.46 3.00 1664 2167
Jan 0.0 0 33 2.28 1.55 1488 1986
Fev 0.0 0 - 3.41 2.75 1334 1708
Decision Support Systems
How to get there?
Optimal
(Desired)
Current
Low Carbon Brazil Study
Herd Dynamics/
Production systems
allocation models
Bovine Meat Demand Projections Land Availability Projections
allocation models
Farm model
Productivity of Land
Emissions projections
Economic Analysis
World Bank, 2010
Pastagens (172 M ha)
Vegetação
Natural
Outros Cultivos (78 M ha)
Planning at the country level
World Bank, 2010
Emissões dos sistemas prototípicos
Sistema produtivo Emissões por animal no rebanho (kg/ano) Emissões/produto
(kg CO2-e/ kg carcaça) CH4 N2O CO2-e
Pastagens degradadas 56,38 0,20 1,25 29,65
Pastagens extensivas 51,71 0,22 1,15 21,89 -26%Pastagens extensivas 51,71 0,22 1,15 21,89
ILP1 51,73 0,21 1,15 18,76
Confinamento2 51,53 0,21 1,15 17,64
-26%
-37%
-40%
World Bank, 2010
Baseline Scenario
Production systems composition
0
50
100
150
200
Áre
a (m
ilh
õe
s d
e h
a)
Extensivo
Degradado
ILP - Pastagem
ILP - Cultivo
Low Carbon Scenario
Pasture recovery
Expansion of crop-livestock
Supplemented finishing
0
20
10
20
12
20
14
20
16
20
18
20
20
20
22
20
24
20
26
20
28
20
30
Ano
Low Carbon Scenario
World Bank, 2010
Land productivityprojections
Baseline
Low Carbon
World Bank, 2010
year
Emissions projections
255
260
265
270
275
Emis
sio
ns
10
6t
CO
2-e
Baseline Low Carbon
235
240
245
250
255
2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026 2028 2030
Emis
sio
ns
10
Year World Bank, 2010
Efficiency projections
World Bank, 2010
Obrigado!Gracias!Gracias!
Thank [email protected]