recognition of prior learning - issues in quality assurance -
DESCRIPTION
Recognition of Prior Learning - issues in quality assurance -. experiences of the HvA University of Applied Sciences Amsterdam. Lucie te Lintelo RPL Centre Hogeschool van Amsterdam. Content. 1. Introduction: HvA and RPL, a quick overview 2. A perspective on quality: - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Recognition of Prior Learning- issues in quality assurance -experiences of the HvA
University of Applied Sciences Amsterdam
Lucie te LinteloRPL Centre
Hogeschool van Amsterdam
Content
1. Introduction: HvA and RPL, a quick overview
2. A perspective on quality: stakeholders, concepts and tools
3. Organization of RPL
4. Accreditation as a RPL provider
1. Introduction HvA and RPL
Hogeschool van Amsterdam [HvA]:
• University of Applied Sciences• Bachelor degree and master degree programmes in a professional fieldBusiness Administration – Engineering - Built Environment - Social Work – Education – Communication – Law – Health – ICT
• All degree courses are competence based• A regular bachelor degree course: 240 credits = a 4-year programme• More than 34.000 students (6.000 are working adults studying for a degree on a parttime base)
1. Introduction HvA and RPL
RPL in the HvA, a quick overview
Goal: enhancing accessibility of degree programmes for professional workers:» Individuals» Private and public companies: co-operation with
organizations in upgrading their employees
RPL as a start of an individualized degree programme. RPL can lead to:» Exemption of part(s) of the programme» A workbased learning route (demand steered)
Standards used in RPL are educational standards» all qualifications of a bachelor degree programme, in
learning outcomes
RPL in the HvA, a quick overview The RPL procedure:
quickscan (optional) – intake/advice – compiling portfolio – criterion based interview with 2 assessors
Resulting in: a report describing acquired competencies – a letter of the exam board on awarded credits when enrolling in the bachelor program
Online supported, whole procedure takes 3-4 months
2. Perspective on quality
Advisor
Assessors
Advisor
AssessorsExam
board
Exam
board
HRM
Operational
manager
HRM
Operational
manager
ParticipantParticipant
Educational Department
Teachers
Managers
Counselors
RPL Centre
Organization/employer
Focus on trust and expertise
Quality of the standard used in RPL» All competencies of a bachelor degree programme
formulated in learning outcomes: professional tasks / activities / criteria
» Recognisable for employees» Transparant and measurable
Quality of the advisors and assessors, see next sheet
Quality of the methods and instruments Communication and agreement with exam board and
educational department
Quality of the assessors1. Selection of assessors [competence profile]: internal / external
2. Training programme:1. Work conference: RPL-proces and instruments, levels,
competence criteria2. Training assessor skills: questioning- and assessing techniques;
practice with authentic portfolio and actor; critical situations
3. Feedback on performance in real assessment situation [by independant assessment professional]
4. Test of assessor competence in real assessment situation- showing all assessor criteria: assessor certificate
5. To preserve the certificate- evaluation, feedback, intervision, workshops
Focus on satisfaction and expectations
Matching the needs of the participant, and his organization, with our possibilities» Do we know what the participant wants?
» Do we know what the organization wants?
» Are we the right RPL provider for them? What standard(s) is/are suitable? Does the regular procedure fit or do we have to develop a tailor made procedure and/or instruments?
» Who do we need to involve in this, within the HvA and within the company?
Openess about procedure and possible outcomes It is about long term investments – developing
partnerships – flexibility - communication
3. Organization of RPL
A central RPL Unit: Portal for organizations/candidates Developing RPL tools and procedures i.c.w. educational
departments and organizations Planning and organization of RPL assessments Quality assurance and training and accreditation of assessors Development of expertise and support LLL policy
Educational departments are responsible for the tailormade flexible degree programmes
Close co-operation between ed. departments and RPL Centre: every department has its RPL-co-ordinator
4. Accreditation as a RPL provider
National policy: in 2009 all RPL providers must be accredited
National RPL Code
Process of accreditation:1. Extensive selfevaluation on the RPL Code2. Visit and review by one of the designated
organizations for validation, resulting in a report3. Accreditation by the Dutch Knowlegde Centre of RPL
(valid for 3 years), registration as a RPL provider
National Quality Code for RPL
1. Goal RPL is to define, evaluate and accredit individual competencies.
2. RPL answers the need of the individual. Entitlements and arrangements are clearly defined and guaranteed.
3. Procedures and instruments are reliable and based on solid standards.
4. Assessors and supervisors are competent, impartial and independent.
5. Quality of RPL is guaranteed and is being improved on an ongoing basis.