reassignment committee meeting june 25, 2012

Student Reassignment Committee

Meeting Monday, June 25, 2012

4:00 p.m.

Final (?) Scenario Presentation

District Reassignment Committee

Meeting

3

AGENDASTUDENT REASSIGNMENT COMMITTEE MEETING

Media Center, Nash Central High SchoolMonday, June 25, 2012 - 4:00 pm

Call to Order……………………………………………………………………Victor Ward

Roll Call………………………………………………………………………..Carina Bryant

Approval of Minutes from the May 29, 2012 & June 12, 2012 Meetings Committee Operating Procedure Scenario Review and Revision………………………………Mike Miller,

OREd Report to School Board 8/6/12 Questions?

Next Meeting Scenario Discussion

July 17, 20126:00 pm

Communications

Nash-Rocky Mount Public Schools

5

TIME-LINE

Jan-Aug 2012

Committee Deliberations/

Monthly Reports to the School

Board

Aug - 2012Committee

Recommendations Presented to

the School Board

Aug – Dec 2012

Public Input/ Community Engagement

Board of Education Approval

August 2013Implementatio

n

6

PROCESS IS EVERYTHING

Board of Education

Community Feedback Committee

Committee Chairs

Public Engagement

Technical Support

OREDStaff

7

Contiguous boundaries: Attempt to maintain contiguous school boundaries without using satellite

attendance areas.

Respect neighborhoods: Avoid dividing easily recognized “neighborhoods” or identified

“developments” or “sub- divisions” unless it is necessary to meet other guidelines. Whenever possible and practical use major highways, railroads, rivers, and streams as natural boundaries.

Proximity to schools: While it is recognized that all students cannot be assigned to their closest

school, consider students proximity to other schools when creating school boundaries.

School Board Priorities

8

Modify feeder systems: In order to maximize facility use and establish reasonable numbers of students at each site,

consider the use of 6 middle school feeder systems instead of 5. This would allow smaller, more instructionally suited middle schools and less dependence on mobile classrooms.

Stay within enrollment capacities: Unless it is likely that a school enrollment will be declining, assign students to the four high

schools in a way that their enrollments are under established capacities.

Consider anticipated growth: Enrollment growth patterns should be taken into consideration, where feasible, to ensure that

anticipated growth will not adversely impact one school significantly more than the others.

Enrollment balance: In keeping with the intent of SB612, attempt to balance the percentage of academic and

economic populations at each middle and high school.

School Board Priorities

9

IPSAC – Timeline

February 13 – Understanding the Optimization ProcessMarch 26 – Out of Capacity table and Scenario Data

April 30 – Scenario Review and Revision

May 29 – Scenario Review and Revision (cont.)

June 12 – Scenario Review and Revision (cont.)

June 25 – Final (?) Scenario Presentation

TransparentLines of CommunicationsCommittee Meetings

Open to the publicWebsite

Information posted immediately after each meetingE-mail/ Phone Line

An e-mail address to answer questions/ receive feedback etc has been established to ensure seamless communication and to make all information readily available to the public.

A phone line has been established for those with limited or no internet access to provide feedback to the committee.

COMMUNICATIONS

11

Mike Miller, OREd

Final (?) Scenario Presentation

Middle School ScenariosClean feeder to HSBased on Scenario HS 02, Rev. 1Parker as 6th grade center for RM school(s)2 options

Elementary School ScenarioMinor adjustments to current zonesInformed by optimal scenario ES 01 (Proximity +

Utilization)Relief for Benvenue (currently at 111%)

IPSAC – Status

12

Free/Reduced Lunch – percentage of impacted population eligible for Free or Reduced Lunch . Data supplied in aggregate form by NRMPS, calculated across K-12.

Academic Proficiency – percentage of impacted population scoring Proficient in both Reading and Math. Data supplied by NRMPS, calculated across grades 3-8.

Minority – percentage of non-white impacted population . Data obtained from NCWISE download, calculated by level (E/M/H)

Data represented in aggregate form only as percentage of school population.

13

Clarification: Student Balance Metrics

Metrics measure current student demographics by residence.

Metrics are used as planning tool for demographic balance.

Metrics are not intended as a forecast of future school demographics/performance.

14

Clarification: Student Balance Metrics

REVIEW: High School Attendance ZonesScenario HS 02, Rev. 1

IMPACT + FEEDERMaximum Utilization: 107% (NNHS, currently

105%)

Minimum Utilization: 98%Total Grade 9-12 students reassigned:

736

CURRENT HIGH SCHOOLHIGH SCHOOL SCENARIO HS 02 – REV. 1

Scenario Review – High Schools

Middle School Attendance ZonesCurrent/MS 03, Rev. 1/MS 04, Rev. 1 Data

(See data tables in handout.)

Edwards Nash Central Parker Red Oak Southern Nash NEW MS (RM HS site)

CURRENT 729 633 433 910 1099 0

IMPACT + METRICS (MS 03, Rev. 1)

448 614 483 885 946 428


558 614 279 885 946 522

100

300

500

700

900

1100

6-8 Student Count


CURRENT 0.881499395405079

0.944776119402985

0.77737881508079

1.07058823529412

1.29294117647059

0


0.597333333333333

0.916417910447761

0.867145421903052

1.04117647058824

1.11294117647059

0.570666666666667


0.744 0.916417910447761

0.500897666068223

1.04117647058824

1.11294117647059

0.696

10%

50%

90%

130%

Utilization


CURRENT 0.781893004115226

0.669826224328595

0.877598152424942

0.585714285714285

0.51410373066424

0


0.758670520231214

0.49520766773163

0.86 0.563758389261745

0.53755364806867

0.957575757575758


0.804308797127469

0.49520766773163

0.891823899371069

0.563758389261745

0.53755364806867

0.891823899371069

10%

50%

90%

Minority %


CURRENT 0.728409448818898

0.679363699582754

0.7765 0.581846153846154

0.64117389298893

0


0.715378123985719

0.544407753050969

0.77 0.5733342154009 0.66889689578714

0.860302497361942


0.744224172317511

0.544407753050969

0.814793678665497

0.5733342154009 0.66889689578714

0.814793678665497

5%

35%

65%

95%

Free/Reduced Lunch %


CURRENT 0.511127063890883

0.541571319603356

0.551357733175915

0.685584562996595

0.631374453618262

0


0.501789549033644

0.676159479251424

0.48 0.687109596819989

0.624854819976772

0.458432304038005


0.460742018981881

0.676159479251424

0.497001998667555

0.687109596819989

0.624854819976772

0.497001998667555

5%15%25%35%45%55%65%75%

Academic Proficiency %

Middle School Attendance ZonesCurrent/MS 03, Rev. 1/MS 04, Rev. 1 Data

Maximum Utilization: 111% (SNMS, currently 129%)

Minimum Utilization: 50% (Parker, MS 04 Rev.1, currently 78%)

All clean feeder to High Schools except Edwards split to NCHS and RMHS

Total Grade 6-8 students reassignedMS 03, Rev. 1: 1093 (~ 350 to New MS)

MS 04, Rev. 1: 1221 (~ 510 to New MS)

CURRENT MIDDLE SCHOOLMIDDLE SCHOOL SCENARIO MS 03, REV. 1

Scenario Review – Middle Schools

CURRENT MIDDLE SCHOOLMIDDLE SCHOOL SCENARIO MS 04, REV. 1

Scenario Review – Middle Schools

Elementary School Attendance ZonesCurrent/ES 01, Rev. 2

(See data tables in handout.)

Bailey Baskerville

Benv-enue

Cedar Grove

Coop-ers

Johnson MB Hub-bard

Middle-sex

Nash-ville

Pope Red Oak/Swift Creek

Spring Hope

Willi-ford

Win-stead/Engle-wood

CUR-RENT

620 341 743 221 624 475 492 340 709 279 583 550 437 1081

UTIL + IMPACT (ES 01, Rev. 2)

620 341 625 221 624 452 492 340 625 302 673 550 557 1073

100300500700900

1100

K-5 Student Count

Bailey Baskerville

Benv-enue

Cedar Grove

Coop-ers

Johnson MB Hub-bard

Middle-sex

Nash-ville


Spring Hope

Willi-ford


CURRENT

0.933734939759036

0.798594847775176

1.11227544910

18

0.991031390134529

1.03826955074

875

0.826086956521739

0.9609375

0.813397129186603

1.03958944281

525

0.897106109324759

0.719753086419753

1.01476014760

148

0.752151462994837

0.954104148278906

UTIL + IM-PACT (ES 01, Rev. 2)

0.933734939759036

0.798594847775176

0.935628742514971

0.991031390134529

1.03826955074

875

0.786086956521739

0.9609375

0.813397129186603

0.916422287390029

0.971061093247589

0.830864197530864

1.01476014760

148

0.95869191049

914

0.947043248014122

10%

50%

90%

Utilization

Bailey Baskerville

Benv-enue

Cedar Grove

Coop-ers

Johnson MB Hub-bard

Middle-sex

Nash-ville


Spring Hope

Willi-ford


CURRENT

0.65483870967

742

0.982404692082112

0.737550471063257

0.520361990950226

0.307692307692308

0.995789473684211

0.780487804878049

0.588235294117647

0.493653032440056

0.989247311827957

0.437392795883362

0.514545454545455

0.965675057208238

0.640148011100833


0.65483870967

742

0.982404692082112

0.7088 0.520361990950226

0.307692307692308

0.995575221238938

0.780487804878049

0.588235294117647

0.5024 0.990066225165563

0.432392273402675

0.514545454545455

0.969479353680431

0.632805219012116

10%

50%

90%

Minority %

Bailey Baskerville

Benv-enue

Cedar Grove

Coop-ers

Johnson MB Hub-bard

Middle-sex

Nash-ville


Spring Hope

Willi-ford


CURRENT

0.709450714823175

0.936566265060241

0.684589625738674

0.728067729083666

0.467428797468355

0.909124378109453

0.703311320754717

0.702206266318538

0.520635430038511

0.907741433021807

0.456706210746685

0.650129659643437

0.922113163972286

0.593824966681475


0.709450714823175

0.936566265060241

0.651562264150943

0.728067729083666

0.467428797468355

0.900571725571726

0.703311320754717

0.702206266318538

0.531272860277981

0.919839416058395

0.455581395348837

0.650129659643437

0.921295097132285

0.590638489208633

5%

35%

65%

95%

Free/Reduced Lunch %

Bailey Baskerville

Benv-enue

Cedar Grove

Coop-ers

Johnson MB Hub-bard

Middle-sex

Nash-ville


Spring Hope

Willi-ford


CURRENT

0.618270799347472

0.450657894736842

0.629283489096573

0.731707317073171

0.729636048526863

0.377232142857143

0.575692963752665

0.61307901907

357

0.705801104972376

0.348122866894198

0.721815519765739

0.601973684210527

0.348448687350836

0.606741573033708


0.618270799347472

0.450657894736842

0.652877697841727

0.731707317073171

0.729636048526863

0.375291375291375

0.575692963752665

0.61307901907

357

0.69375 0.352564102564103

0.730569948186529

0.601973684210527

0.351816443594647

0.620292887029289

5%25%45%65%

Academic Proficiency %

Maximum Utilization: 104% (Coopers, currently 104%)

Minimum Utilization: 79% (Johnson, currently 83%)

Total Grade K-5 students reassigned: 363

Elementary School Attendance ZonesCurrent/ES 01, Rev. 2

CURRENT ELEMENTARY SCHOOLELEMENTARY SCHOOL SCENARIO ES 01, REV.2

Scenario Review – Elementary Schools

Summary

Middle School Scenarios: Impact + Metrics5 MS feeding 4 HSScenario MS 03, Rev. 1: Parker – 6th grade center

for New MS and EdwardsScenario MS 04, Rev. 1: Parker – 6th grade center

for New MSClean feeder to HS, except for EdwardsTotal Grade 6-8 students reassigned: 1093 – 1221

Elementary School Scenario: Utilization + ImpactOptimal Scenario ES 01, Rev. 2Total Grade K-5 students reassigned: 363

28

29

Proximity + Utilization

Optimal Scenarios

Review/ Revise

Review/ Revise

Optimal Scenarios

Review/ Revise

Review/ Revise

Impact + Feeder

February 13 (4:00-5:30)

March 26 (6:00)

April 30 (6:00)

May 29 (6:00)

June 12 (6:00)

Tuesday June 25 (4:00–5:30)

July/August - TBD

MEETING SCHEDULE

QUESTIONS

reassignment committee meeting june 25, 2012

Education

metrics ms

school enrollment

scenario data

nash central high school

school significantlymore

contiguous school boundaries

scenario presentation

middle school feeder