reasoning with bayesian networks

37
Reasoning with Bayesian Networks

Upload: lamya

Post on 03-Feb-2016

104 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Reasoning with Bayesian Networks. Overview. Bayesian Belief Networks (BBNs) can reason with networks of propositions and associated probabilities Useful for many AI problems Diagnosis Expert systems Planning Learning. Recall Bayes Rule. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Reasoning with Bayesian Networks

Reasoning with Bayesian Networks

Page 2: Reasoning with Bayesian Networks

Overview

• Bayesian Belief Networks (BBNs) can reason with networks of propositions and associated probabilities

• Useful for many AI problems– Diagnosis– Expert systems– Planning– Learning

Page 3: Reasoning with Bayesian Networks

Recall Bayes Rule

)()|()()|(),( HPHEPEPEHPEHP

)(

)()|()|(

EP

HPHEPEHP

Note the symmetry: we can compute the probability of a hypothesis given its evidence and vice versa.

Page 4: Reasoning with Bayesian Networks

Simple Bayesian Network

CancerSmoking heavylightnoS ,,

malignantbenignnoneC ,,P(S=no) 0.80P(S=light) 0.15P(S=heavy) 0.05

Smoking= no light heavyP(C=none) 0.96 0.88 0.60P(C=benign) 0.03 0.08 0.25P(C=malig) 0.01 0.04 0.15

Page 5: Reasoning with Bayesian Networks

More Complex Bayesian Network

Smoking

GenderAge

Cancer

LungTumor

SerumCalcium

Exposureto Toxics

Page 6: Reasoning with Bayesian Networks

More Complex Bayesian Network

Smoking

GenderAge

Cancer

LungTumor

SerumCalcium

Exposureto Toxics

Links represent“causal” relations

Nodesrepresentvariables

Page 7: Reasoning with Bayesian Networks

More Complex Bayesian Network

Smoking

GenderAge

Cancer

LungTumor

SerumCalcium

Exposureto Toxics

predispositions

Page 8: Reasoning with Bayesian Networks

More Complex Bayesian Network

Smoking

GenderAge

Cancer

LungTumor

SerumCalcium

Exposureto Toxics

condition

Page 9: Reasoning with Bayesian Networks

More Complex Bayesian Network

Smoking

GenderAge

Cancer

LungTumor

SerumCalcium

Exposureto Toxics

observable symptoms

Page 10: Reasoning with Bayesian Networks

Independence

Age and Gender are independent.

P(A|G) = P(A) A G P(G|A) = P(G) G A

GenderAge

P(A,G) = P(G|A) P(A) = P(G)P(A)P(A,G) = P(A|G) P(G) = P(A)P(G)

P(A,G) = P(G)P(A)

Page 11: Reasoning with Bayesian Networks

Conditional Independence

Smoking

GenderAge

Cancer

Cancer is independent of Age and Gender given Smoking.

P(C|A,G,S) = P(C|S) C A,G | S

Page 12: Reasoning with Bayesian Networks

Conditional Independence: Naïve Bayes

Cancer

LungTumor

SerumCalcium

Serum Calcium is independent of Lung Tumor, given Cancer

P(L|SC,C) = P(L|C)

Serum Calcium and Lung Tumor are dependent

Naïve Bayes assumption: evidence (e.g., symptoms) is indepen-dent given the disease. This make it easy to combine evidence

Page 13: Reasoning with Bayesian Networks

Explaining Away

Exposure to Toxics is dependent on Smoking, given Cancer

Exposure to Toxics and Smoking are independentSmoking

Cancer

Exposureto Toxics

P(E = heavy | C = malignant) >

P(E = heavy | C = malignant, S=heavy)

“Explaining away” is like abductive inference in that it moves from observation to possible causes or explanations.

Page 14: Reasoning with Bayesian Networks

Conditional Independence

Smoking

GenderAge

Cancer

LungTumor

SerumCalcium

Exposureto Toxics Cancer is independent

of Age and Gender given Exposure to Toxics and Smoking.

Descendants

Parents

Non-Descendants

A variable (node) is conditionally independent of its non-descendants given its parents

Page 15: Reasoning with Bayesian Networks

Another non-descendant

Diet Cancer is independent of Diet given Exposure to Toxics and Smoking

Smoking

GenderAge

Cancer

LungTumor

SerumCalcium

Exposureto Toxics

A variable is conditionally independent of its non-descendants given its parents

Page 16: Reasoning with Bayesian Networks

BBN Construction

The knowledge acquisition process for a BBN involves three steps

– Choosing appropriate variables

– Deciding on the network structure

– Obtaining data for the conditional probability tables

Page 17: Reasoning with Bayesian Networks

Risk of Smoking Smoking

They should be values, not probabilities

(1) Choosing variables

Variables should be collectively exhaustive, mutually exclusive values

4321 xxxx

jixx ji )(

Error Occurred

No Error

Page 18: Reasoning with Bayesian Networks

Heuristic: Knowable in Principle

Example of good variables

– Weather {Sunny, Cloudy, Rain, Snow}

– Gasoline: Cents per gallon

– Temperature { 100F , < 100F}

– User needs help on Excel Charting {Yes, No}

– User’s personality {dominant, submissive}

Page 19: Reasoning with Bayesian Networks

(2) Structuring

LungTumor

SmokingExposureto Toxic

GenderAgeNetwork structure correspondingto “causality” is usually good.

CancerGeneticDamage

Initially this uses the designer’sknowledge but can be checked with data

Page 20: Reasoning with Bayesian Networks

(3) The numbers

• Zeros and ones are often enough

• Order of magnitude is typical: 10-9 vs 10-6

• Sensitivity analysis can be used to decide accuracy needed

• Second decimal usually doesn’t matter

• Relative probabilities are important

Page 21: Reasoning with Bayesian Networks

Predictive Inference

How likely are elderly malesto get malignant cancer?

P(C=malignant | Age>60, Gender=male)

Smoking

GenderAge

Cancer

LungTumor

SerumCalcium

Exposureto Toxics

Page 22: Reasoning with Bayesian Networks

Predictive and diagnostic combined

How likely is an elderly male patient with high Serum Calcium to have malignant cancer?

P(C=malignant | Age>60, Gender= male, Serum Calcium = high)

Smoking

GenderAge

Cancer

LungTumor

SerumCalcium

Exposureto Toxics

Page 23: Reasoning with Bayesian Networks

Explaining away

Smoking

GenderAge

Cancer

LungTumor

SerumCalcium

Exposureto Toxics

• If we see a lung tumor, the probability of heavy smoking and of exposure to toxics both go up.

• If we then observe heavy smoking, the probability of exposure to toxics goes back down.

Smoking

Page 24: Reasoning with Bayesian Networks

Decision making

• Decision - an irrevocable allocation of domain resources

• Decision should be made so as to maximize expected utility.

• View decision making in terms of– Beliefs/Uncertainties– Alternatives/Decisions– Objectives/Utilities

Page 25: Reasoning with Bayesian Networks

A Decision Problem

Should I have my party inside or outside?

in

out

Regret

Relieved

Perfect!

Disaster

dry

wet

dry

wet

Page 26: Reasoning with Bayesian Networks

Value Function

A numerical score over all possible states of the world allows BBN to be used to make decisions

Location? Weather? Valuein dry $50in wet $60out dry $100out wet $0

Page 27: Reasoning with Bayesian Networks

Netica

• Software for working with Bayesian belief networks and influence diagrams

• A commercial product but free for small networks

• Includes a graphical editor, compiler, inference engine, etc.

• http://www.norsys.com/

Page 28: Reasoning with Bayesian Networks
Page 29: Reasoning with Bayesian Networks

Predispositions or causes

Page 30: Reasoning with Bayesian Networks

Conditions or diseases

Page 31: Reasoning with Bayesian Networks

Functional Node

Page 32: Reasoning with Bayesian Networks

Symptoms or effects

Dyspnea is shortness of breath

Page 33: Reasoning with Bayesian Networks
Page 34: Reasoning with Bayesian Networks
Page 35: Reasoning with Bayesian Networks
Page 36: Reasoning with Bayesian Networks
Page 37: Reasoning with Bayesian Networks