reactive power -sscet- 1024- final
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/28/2019 Reactive Power -SSCET- 1024- Final
1/32
Reactive Power Management and VoltageStability
Sharma Kolluri, IEEE Fellow
Manager of Transmission PlanningEntergy Services Inc
Presentation at2012 Southeast Symposium on Contemporary Engineering
Topics (SSCET)
October 26, 2012
New Orleans, Louisiana
-
7/28/2019 Reactive Power -SSCET- 1024- Final
2/32
Outline
Background/Introduction
VAR Basics
Voltage Stability
FIDVR
Technology
Summary
.
-
7/28/2019 Reactive Power -SSCET- 1024- Final
3/32
-
7/28/2019 Reactive Power -SSCET- 1024- Final
4/32
Recommendation#23
Strengthen Reactive Power andControl Practices in all NERC Regions
Reactive power problem was a
significant factor in the August 14outage, and they were alsoimportant elements in the several ofthe earlier outages
-Quote form the outage report
-
7/28/2019 Reactive Power -SSCET- 1024- Final
5/32
Reactive Power Basics
-
7/28/2019 Reactive Power -SSCET- 1024- Final
6/32
Laws of Reactive Physics
Complex Power called Volt Amperes (VA) is comprised
of resistive current IR and reactive current IQ times the
voltage.
VA = VIT* = V (IR jIQ) = P + jQ
Power Factor (PF) = Cosine of angle between P and
VA
P = VA times PF
System Losses
Ploss = IT2 R (Watts)
Qloss = IT2 X (VARs)
VA
P
Q
North American Electric Reliability Corporation
-
7/28/2019 Reactive Power -SSCET- 1024- Final
7/32
Reactive Physics VAR loss
Every component with reactance, X: VAR loss = IT2 X
Z is comprised of resistance R and reactance X
On 138kV lines, X = 2 to 5 times larger than R.
One 230kV lines, X = 5 to 10 times larger than R.
On 500kV lines, X = 25 times larger than R.
R decreases when conductor diameter increases. X increases
as the required geometry of phase to phase spacing increases.
VAR loss
Increases in proportion to the square of the total current.
Is approximately 2 to 25 times larger than Watt loss.
North American Electric Reliability Corporation
-
7/28/2019 Reactive Power -SSCET- 1024- Final
8/32
-
7/28/2019 Reactive Power -SSCET- 1024- Final
9/32
Transmission Line Real and Reactive
Power Losses vs. Line Loading
Source: B. Kirby and E. Hirst 1997,Ancillary-Service Details: Voltage Control,
ORNL/CON-453, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tenn., December 1997.
-
7/28/2019 Reactive Power -SSCET- 1024- Final
10/32
Static and Dynamic VAR Support
Static Reactive Power Devices Cannot quickly change the reactive power level as long as the
voltage level remains constant.
Reactive power production level drops when the voltage leveldrops.
Examples include capacitors and inductors.
Dynamic Reactive Power Devices Can quickly change the MVAR level independent of the voltage
level.
Reactive power production level increases when the voltagelevel drops.
Examples include static VAR compensators (SVC), synchronouscondensers, and generators.
-
7/28/2019 Reactive Power -SSCET- 1024- Final
11/32
Reactive Power Management
Effectively balancing capacitive and inductive components of
a power system to provide sufficient voltage support.
Essential for reliable power system operation.
Prevention of voltage collapse
Benefits
Improves efficiency of power delivery.
Improves utilization of transmission assets.
Reduces congestion and increases power transfer capability.
Enhances grid security.
-
7/28/2019 Reactive Power -SSCET- 1024- Final
12/32
Reactive Power for Voltage
SupportReactive
LoadsVARs flow from High voltage
to Low voltage; import of
VARs indicate reactive
power deficit
-
7/28/2019 Reactive Power -SSCET- 1024- Final
13/32
Voltage Stability
-
7/28/2019 Reactive Power -SSCET- 1024- Final
14/32
What is Voltage Instability/Collapse?
A power system undergoes voltage
collapse if post-disturbance voltages are
below acceptable limits
voltage collapse may be due to voltage or angularinstability
Main factor causing voltage instability is the
inability of the power systems to maintaina proper balance of reactive power and
voltage control
-
7/28/2019 Reactive Power -SSCET- 1024- Final
15/32
Voltage Instability/Collapse
The driving force for voltage instability isusually the load.
The possible outcome of voltage instability:
loss of loads
loss of integrity of the power system
Voltage stability timeframe:
transient voltage instability: 0 to 10 secs
long-term voltage stability: 1 10 mins
-
7/28/2019 Reactive Power -SSCET- 1024- Final
16/32
Key Concerns
Minimize
motortripping
Limit UVLSactivationVoltage
(pu)
-
7/28/2019 Reactive Power -SSCET- 1024- Final
17/32
P-V Curve
Q V C
-
7/28/2019 Reactive Power -SSCET- 1024- Final
18/32
Q-V Curve
200
Q-V Curve with Detailed Load Model
Peak Load with Fixed Taps
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5
Voltage (p.u.)
Mvars
Base Case
Contingency
-
7/28/2019 Reactive Power -SSCET- 1024- Final
19/32
Voltages at Goslin 138kV Station
Time (seconds)
Voltage(volts)
-
7/28/2019 Reactive Power -SSCET- 1024- Final
20/32
Common Solutions for Voltage Instability
Install/Operate Shunt Capacitor/Reactor Banks
Add dynamic Shunt Compensation in the form of
SVC/STATCOM/DVAR to mitigate transient voltage dips
Add Series Compensation on transmission lines in theproblem area
Construct transmission facilities
Coordinate Voltage Schedules/Reactive Power Flows
Implement UVLS Scheme
-
7/28/2019 Reactive Power -SSCET- 1024- Final
21/32
Fault Induced Delayed VoltageRecovery (FIDVR)
-
7/28/2019 Reactive Power -SSCET- 1024- Final
22/32
Fault Induced Delayed Voltage
Recovery (FIDVR)
What is it? After a fault has cleared, the voltage stays at low levels
(below 80%) for several seconds
Results in dropping load / generation or fast voltage
collapse 4 key factors drive FIDVR:
Fault Duration
Fault Location
High load level with high induction motor
load penetration
Unfavorable Generation Pattern
-
7/28/2019 Reactive Power -SSCET- 1024- Final
23/32
A Near Fast Voltage
Collapse in Phoenix in
1995
North American Electric
Reliability Council, SystemDisturbances, Review of
Selected 1995 Electric System
Disturbances in North
America, March 1996.
-
7/28/2019 Reactive Power -SSCET- 1024- Final
24/32
Technology
for Addressing Reactive
Power/Voltage Stability
Problems
-
7/28/2019 Reactive Power -SSCET- 1024- Final
25/32
Porter SVC
-
7/28/2019 Reactive Power -SSCET- 1024- Final
26/32
Porter Static Var Compensator (SVC)
Maintains
system
voltage by
continuously
varying VAR
output to meetsystem
demands.
Controls
capacitor
banks on the
transmissionsystem to
match reactive
power output
to the load
requirements.
-
7/28/2019 Reactive Power -SSCET- 1024- Final
27/32
Series Capacitor
Dayton Bulk 230kV Station
The Capacitor
offsets
reactance in
the line,
making it
appear to the
system to be
half of its
actual length.
Power flows
are redirected
over this largerline, unloading
parallel lines
and increasing
transfer
capability.
Static compensator
-
7/28/2019 Reactive Power -SSCET- 1024- Final
28/32
Static compensator
(STATCOM)
Voltage source converter
device
Alternating voltage source
behind a coupling reactance
Can be operated at its fulloutput current even at very low
voltages
Depending upon
manufacturer's design,STATCOMs may have
increased transient rating both
in inductive as well as
capacitive mode of operation
Transformer
DC-AC switching converter
I
X
System bus
Cs
Vdc
V
E
Schematic diagram of STATCOM
-
7/28/2019 Reactive Power -SSCET- 1024- Final
29/32
Natchez DVAR
-
7/28/2019 Reactive Power -SSCET- 1024- Final
30/32
D-VAR
MT
Metro138 kV
34.5 kV
FDR
34.5 kV25.2
MVAR
480 V34.5 kV
-
7/28/2019 Reactive Power -SSCET- 1024- Final
31/32
Summary
The increasing need to operate the transmission
system at its maximum safe transfer limit has
become a primary concern at most utilities
Reactive power supply or VAR management isan important ingredient in maintaining healthy
power system voltages and facilitating power
transfers
Inadequate reactive power supply was a majorfactor in most of the recent blackouts
-
7/28/2019 Reactive Power -SSCET- 1024- Final
32/32
Questions?