r&d for the next generation of gaseous photon detectors...

31
25/07/2008 25/07/2008 - - SPIN 2008 PRAHA SPIN 2008 PRAHA 1 1 /30 /30 R&D for the next generation R&D for the next generation of gaseous photon detectors of gaseous photon detectors for Imaging Cherenkov Counters for Imaging Cherenkov Counters Today Today s generation of gaseous PD, s generation of gaseous PD, The R&D lab studies The R&D lab studies Our plans for future Our plans for future Jarda Polak (INFN Trieste and TUL Liberec) Today Today s generation of gaseous PD, s generation of gaseous PD, their limitations their limitations and the way out and the way out

Upload: others

Post on 06-Sep-2019

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

25/07/2008 25/07/2008 -- SPIN 2008 PRAHA SPIN 2008 PRAHA 11/30/30

R&D for the next generationR&D for the next generationof gaseous photon detectors of gaseous photon detectors

for Imaging Cherenkov Countersfor Imaging Cherenkov Counters

TodayToday’’s generation of gaseous PD, s generation of gaseous PD, their limitations their limitations and the way outand the way out

The R&D lab studiesThe R&D lab studies

Our plans for futureOur plans for future

Jarda Polak(INFN Trieste and TUL Liberec)

TodayToday’’s generation of gaseous PD, s generation of gaseous PD, their limitations their limitations and the way outand the way out

25/07/2008 25/07/2008 -- SPIN 2008 PRAHA SPIN 2008 PRAHA 22/30/30

Photon Detectors used for Photon Detectors used for RICHsRICHsbelong to three categories:belong to three categories:

Vacuum based Vacuum based PDsPDsPMTSPMTS ((SELEXSELEX, , HERMESHERMES, , BaBarBaBar))MAPMTsMAPMTs ((HERAHERA--BB, , COMPASSCOMPASS))Flat panelsFlat panels ((various test beams, proposed for CBMvarious test beams, proposed for CBM))HybrideHybride PMTsPMTs ((LHCbLHCb))MCPMCP--PMT (PMT (all the studies for the high time resolution applicationsall the studies for the high time resolution applications))

Gaseous Gaseous PDsPDsOrganic vapours: TMAE and TEA (Organic vapours: TMAE and TEA (DELPHIDELPHI, , OMEGAOMEGA, , SLD CRIDSLD CRID, , CLEO IIICLEO III))Solid Solid photocathodesphotocathodes: : CsICsI ((HADESHADES, , COMPASSCOMPASS, , ALICEALICE, , JLABJLAB--HALL A, HALL A, PHENIXPHENIX))

Si Si PDsPDsSilicon Silicon PMsPMs ((first tests only recentlyfirst tests only recently))

25/07/2008 25/07/2008 -- SPIN 2008 PRAHA SPIN 2008 PRAHA 33/30/30

photoconvertingphotoconverting vapours are no longer in use, a part CLEO IIIvapours are no longer in use, a part CLEO III(rates ! time resolution !)(rates ! time resolution !)

the present is represented by MWPC (open geometry!) with the present is represented by MWPC (open geometry!) with CsICsIthe first prove (in experiments !) that coupling solid photocathodes and gaseous detectors worksSevere recovery time (~ 1 d) after detector trips ion feedback Moderate gain: effective gain ~ 104 CsI ionAging bombardment (see below)

The way to the future: The way to the future: ion blocking geometriesion blocking geometriesGEM/THGEM allow for multistage detectors

With THGEMs: High overall gain ↔ pe det. efficiency!Good ion blocking (up to IFB at a few % level)MHSP: IFB at 10-4 level

opening the way to:Gaseous detectors with solid photocathodes for visible light

First step in this direction: PHENIX HBD

PASTPAST

PRESENT

PRESENT

FUTURE

FUTURE

Large sensitive areas Large sensitive areas --> gaseous PD> gaseous PD(the only cost affordable solution)(the only cost affordable solution)

25/07/2008 25/07/2008 -- SPIN 2008 PRAHA SPIN 2008 PRAHA 44/30/30

MWPCs with CsI photocathodes in COMPASS:beam off: stable operation up to > 2300 Vbeam on: stable operation only up to ~2000 V(in spill ph. flux: 0 - 50 kHz/cm2 , mip flux: ~1 kHz/cm2)

Whenever a severe discharge happens, recovery takes ~1 day.Similar behavior reported from JLAB Hall-A

1) Moderate gain

Limitations of recent generation Limitations of recent generation -- MWPCMWPC

Source of the problem: ion bombardment of photo-converting layer

this limits the time

this limits the time

The MWPCThe MWPC

25/07/2008 25/07/2008 -- SPIN 2008 PRAHA SPIN 2008 PRAHA 55/30/30

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 100

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

measurementlognormal fitcomparison to previous method

accumulated charge [mC/cm2] within pos 1

decr

ease

in p

hoto

-cur

rent

[%]

f_p1_nr2 x( ) F x 0.856, 1.695,( ):= chi2 fi0 fi1,( ) 0.404=

Q.E. degradation vs charge

H. Hoedlmoser et al., NIM A 574 (2007)28; H. Hoedlmoser, CERNH. Hoedlmoser et al., NIM A 574 (2007)28; H. Hoedlmoser, CERN--THESISTHESIS--20062006--004004

2) Ageing - first observed at COMPASS- detailed study by Alice team

10 10 µµmm

normalnormal ““white stripwhite strip””CsI surface at microscope (x 1000)

due to ion bombardment - ageing at few mC/cm2

this limits the rate

this limits the rate

25/07/2008 25/07/2008 -- SPIN 2008 PRAHA SPIN 2008 PRAHA 66/30/30

GAS ELECTRON MULTIPLIER (GEM)GAS ELECTRON MULTIPLIER (GEM)Thin metalThin metal--coated polymer foils coated polymer foils 70 70 µµm holes at 140 m holes at 140 µµm pitchm pitch

F. Sauli, NIM A386(1997)531

Manufactured by standard PCB techniques of precise drilling and Cu etching.

ECONOMIC & ROBUSTECONOMIC & ROBUST

There is need of new technologyThere is need of new technology

Possible solution – closed geometriesto overcome recent limits – fight ion bombardment and photon feedback

GEMsGEMs and and THGEMsTHGEMs

1mm

Chechik et al. NIM A535 (2004) 303C. Shalem et al. NIM A558 (2006) 475

& NIM A558 (2006) 468

GEMGEM’’ss principleprinciple

25/07/2008 25/07/2008 -- SPIN 2008 PRAHA SPIN 2008 PRAHA 77/30/30

Examples of ion blocking schemes from literature- Similar schemes can be adopted with THGEM

multiGEMmultiGEM with with Reflective photocathodeReflective photocathode

Electron’s path Ion’s back-flow

ElectronsElectrons

IonsIons

60 %

40 %

MultiGEMMultiGEM’’ss::ion blocking + high GAINion blocking + high GAIN

Simulation of avalancheSimulation of avalanche

25/07/2008 25/07/2008 -- SPIN 2008 PRAHA SPIN 2008 PRAHA 88/30/30

h3Entries 44448Mean 0.9679

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 50

200

400

600

800

1000h3

Entries 44448Mean 0.9679

Polya 0

h5Entries 44448Mean 1.006

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800h5

Entries 44448Mean 1.006

Polya 0.8

3.5 4 4.5 5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.50

100

200

300

400

500

600

h7Entries 44448Mean 0.9993

3.5 4 4.5 5

h7Entries 44448Mean 0.9993

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.50

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

Polya 5

h9Entries 44448Mean 0.9992

h9Entries 44448Mean 0.9992

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

Polya 30

Signal amplitude follows Signal amplitude follows PolyaPolya distribution:distribution:

Threshold always critical !Threshold always critical ! With good electronics:With good electronics:Limited Limited pepe detection efficiency,detection efficiency, threshold no longer criticalthreshold no longer critical

good good pepe detection efficiencydetection efficiencyperformance instabilitiesperformance instabilities stable behaviourstable behaviour

Gain Gain ≈≈ 101066Gain Gain ≈≈ 101044

thresholdthreshold thresholdthreshold

The relevance of high GAINThe relevance of high GAIN

25/07/2008 25/07/2008 -- SPIN 2008 PRAHA SPIN 2008 PRAHA 99/30/30

Why do we try with Why do we try with THGEMsTHGEMsand reflective photocathode?and reflective photocathode?

No need of high space resolution ( > 1 mm)Large area coverage (5.5 m2 for COMPASS RICH)

- industrial production- stiffness- robust against discharge damages

For reflective photocathodes,-no need to keep the window at a fixed potential (2nm Cr -20%)-possibility of windowless geometry-higher effective QE (larger pe extraction probability)

small photoconversion dead zones (<20%; GEM ~ 40%)Large gain

goal: SINGLE PHOTON detectiongoal: SINGLE PHOTON detection

25/07/2008 25/07/2008 -- SPIN 2008 PRAHA SPIN 2008 PRAHA 1010/30/30

EXAMPLES OF THGEMSEXAMPLES OF THGEMS

R3

P1

W2

P1:D=0.8 mmPitch=2 mmRim=0.04 mmThick=1mm

R3:D=0.2 mmPitch=0.5 mmRim=0.01 mmThick=0.2mm

W2:D=0.3 mmPitch=0.7 mmRim=0.1 mmThick=0.4mm

A MULTIPARAMETER SPACE TO EXPLORE !A MULTIPARAMETER SPACE TO EXPLORE !4 geometrical parameters4 geometrical parameters: : diameter pitch rim thicknessdiameter pitch rim thickness+ + materialmaterial + + production procedureproduction procedure

24 different

24 different THGEMs

THGEMs characterized so far

characterized so far

25/07/2008 25/07/2008 -- SPIN 2008 PRAHA SPIN 2008 PRAHA 1111/30/30

THGEM multipliersTHGEM multipliersManufactured by standard PCB techniques of precise drilling (different materials) and Cu etching.

0.1mm RIM: prevents discharges high gains!

1mm

101055 gain in single-THGEM ELTOS S.p.A. (Arezzo, Tuscany)http://www.eltos.it/en/main/en-main.htm

Small diameter holes high rotation speed of the driller. Multi-spindle machines at

ELTOS reach 180000 turns/min hole diam. down to 150 µm.

Nominal drilling tolerance: +- 10 µm

POSALUX ULTRASPEED 6000LZ6-spindle-roboter

= GEM like structure with expanded dimensions

Example of production..Example of production..Example of THGEMExample of THGEM

We are testing samples made at:We are testing samples made at:Weizmann Institute (Israel)Weizmann Institute (Israel)CERN (CERN (RuiRui de Oliveira)de Oliveira)EltosEltos S.p.AS.p.A. (Italy). (Italy)

cross section of one hole

Cu layer

25/07/2008 25/07/2008 -- SPIN 2008 PRAHA SPIN 2008 PRAHA 1212/30/30

small prototypes small prototypes –– activeactivesurface (30 x 30) mmsurface (30 x 30) mm22

1 THGEM layer for this activity1 THGEM layer for this activity

ANODEV0

V1

V2

V3

THGEMtoptop

ThGEM

55Fe source

Configuration inside the chamber

Used Gas: Ar/CO2 70/30 %

THGEM

Test chamber

To detect ionizing particle :V3< V2< V1<V0

CHARACTERIZATION CHARACTERIZATION

Edrift

Einduction

CATHODE

∆V bottombottom

25/07/2008 25/07/2008 -- SPIN 2008 PRAHA SPIN 2008 PRAHA 1313/30/30

LAB STUDIES AT CERN AND TRIESTELAB STUDIES AT CERN AND TRIESTE

so far using Cu Xso far using Cu X--ray ray spectra are collectedspectra are collectedcurrents are measured at HVcurrents are measured at HV

homemade instruments (~200 €)with ~1 pA resolution data collection via pictures and image recognition

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200

0

20

40

60

80

100

120Data: A7WOR063_BModel: Gauss Chi^2/DoF = 8.71997R^2 = 0.98288 y0 0 ±0xc1 358.38194 ±1.127w1 59.83813 ±2.33596A1 1173.67306 ±38.88758xc2 490.61839 ±0.18222w2 67.19041 ±0.38037A2 8612.61426 ±41.12351

Cou

nts

ADC channels

Energy Spectrum

CMOS Operational Amplifier: AD 8607

10 MΩ feedback resistor: VISHAY CNS020(+- 0.02%, +- 10 ppm/ºC)

1 nF to 100 nFfeedback capacitor

25/07/2008 25/07/2008 -- SPIN 2008 PRAHA SPIN 2008 PRAHA 1414/30/30

What we have learned so farWhat we have learned so far1)1) Gain stability vs. RIM Gain stability vs. RIM

RIM: 0.1 mm

RIM: 0

RIM: 0.1mmLong time GAIN variation

25/07/2008 25/07/2008 -- SPIN 2008 PRAHA SPIN 2008 PRAHA 1515/30/30

1)1) Gain stability vs. RIM Gain stability vs. RIM

RIM: 0.1 mm

RIM: 0

Long time GAIN variation

Short time GAIN variation – irradiation at HV switch ON (after ~1 day with NO voltage)

RIM: 0RIM: 0.1 mm

25/07/2008 25/07/2008 -- SPIN 2008 PRAHA SPIN 2008 PRAHA 1616/30/30

1)1) Gain stability vs. RIM Gain stability vs. RIM

RIM: 0RIM: 0.1 mm

RIM: 0.1 mm

RIM: 0

Long time GAIN variation

Short time GAIN variation – irradiation after ~10 hour at nominal voltage without irradiation

25/07/2008 25/07/2008 -- SPIN 2008 PRAHA SPIN 2008 PRAHA 1717/30/30

1)1) Gain stability vs. RIM Gain stability vs. RIM

RIM: 0.1 mm

RIM: 0

Long time GAIN variation

Short time GAIN variation

RIM: 0RIM: 0.1 mm

25/07/2008 25/07/2008 -- SPIN 2008 PRAHA SPIN 2008 PRAHA 1818/30/30Silvia DALLA TORRESilvia DALLA TORRECOMPASS COLLABORATION MEETING, CERN, 22COMPASS COLLABORATION MEETING, CERN, 22--23/5/200823/5/2008

…… also also GEMGEM’’ss are not so stable are not so stable ……

25/07/2008 25/07/2008 -- SPIN 2008 PRAHA SPIN 2008 PRAHA 1919/30/30

2) 2) Larger Larger RIMsRIMs allow higher gains allow higher gains ……

1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8100

1000

Gai

n

Delta V (KV)

THGEM electro-chem. polished without rim THGEM without rim THGEM with rim=0.1mm THGEM made of kapton THGEM with different geometry

PARAMETERS:• Diameter = 0.3 mm• Pitch= 0.7 mm• Thickness = 0.4 mm• Rim = variable• Gas: Ar/CO2 – 70/30

RIM: 0

RIM: 0.01 mm

RIM: 0.1 mm

GA

IN

∆V [ kV ]Large RIM <Large RIM <--> large GAIN and instabilities

> large GAIN and instabilities

25/07/2008 25/07/2008 -- SPIN 2008 PRAHA SPIN 2008 PRAHA 2020/30/30

2)2) but but increasing THICKNESS increasing THICKNESS does it toodoes it too

1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8100

1000

Gai

n

Delta V (KV)

THGEM electro-chem. polished without rim THGEM without rim THGEM with rim=0.1mm THGEM made of kapton THGEM with different geometry

PARAMETERS:• Diameter = 0.3 mm• Pitch= 0.6 mm• Thickness = 0.6 mm• Rim = 0 mm• Gas: Ar/CO2 – 70/30

PARAMETERS:• Diameter = 0.3 mm• Pitch= 0.7 mm• Thickness = 0.4 mm• Rim = variable• Gas: Ar/CO2 – 70/30

GA

IN

∆V [ kV ]

““ThickerThicker”” THGEMS looks promising

THGEMS looks promising

RIM: 0

RIM: 0.01 mm

RIM: 0.1 mm

25/07/2008 25/07/2008 -- SPIN 2008 PRAHA SPIN 2008 PRAHA 2121/30/30

3)3) Are THGEM devices for Are THGEM devices for HIGH RATESHIGH RATES ??

0 20 40 60 80 100 120-200

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

2000

Cu

rren

t (p

A)

Rate (KHz)

RECALL:RECALL:120 kHz/ mm120 kHz/ mm22, 300 e, 300 e-- single photoelectron rates of single photoelectron rates of ~35 MHz/ mm~35 MHz/ mm22

120 kHz / mm120 kHz / mm22

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000E

induction=3.5 KV/cm, E

drift=1.5 KV/cm

Gai

nRate (KHz)

Delta V=1.725 KV Delta V=1.775 KV Linear fit of Delta V=1.725 KV data Linear fit of Delta V=1.775 KV data

120 kHz / mm120 kHz / mm22

PARAMETERS:• Diameter = 0.3 mm• Pitch= 0.7 mm• Thickness = 0.4 mm• Rim = 0.1 mm• Gas: Ar/CO2 – 70/30

20%20%

PARAMETERS:• Diameter = 0.3 mm• Pitch= 0.7 mm• Thickness = 0.4 mm• Rim = 0 mm• Gas: Ar/CO2 – 70/30

Rate is not a limitation

Rate is not a limitation

25/07/2008 25/07/2008 -- SPIN 2008 PRAHA SPIN 2008 PRAHA 2222/30/30

RIM: 0.01 mm

0 2

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

1100

1200 THGEM: d=0.3 mm, p=0.7mm, rim=0mm, t=0.4mm; DeltaV=1.35 KV THGEM: d=0.3 mm, p=0.7mm, rim=0mm, t=0.4mm; treated electro-chem.; DeltaV=1.45 KV THGEM: d=0.3 mm, p=0.7mm, rim=0.1mm, t=0.4mm; DeltaV=1.775 KV

Edrift

(KV/cm)

Gai

n

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500

5000

5500

6000

6500

Gain

DRIFT SCAN

RIM: 0

RIM: 0.01 mm

RIM: 0.1 mm

0 0.5 1. 1.5

PARAMETERS:• Diameter = 0.3 mm• Pitch= 0.7 mm• Thickness = 0.4 mm• Rim = variable• Gas: Ar/CO2 – 70/30

4)4) Tuning theTuning the fieldsfieldsfocusing electrons into the holesfocusing electrons into the holes

GA

IN

Edrift [ kV/cm]X-Ray Source: ~1 mm2, rate ~1.7KHz.

GA

IN

25/07/2008 25/07/2008 -- SPIN 2008 PRAHA SPIN 2008 PRAHA 2323/30/30COMPASS COLLABORATION MEETING, CERN, 22COMPASS COLLABORATION MEETING, CERN, 22--23/5/200823/5/2008

EEinductioninduction changes thechanges thecharge shearing charge shearing between THGEM between THGEM bottom and anodebottom and anode

4)4) Tuning the Tuning the fieldsfieldsbottom/anode current sharingbottom/anode current sharing

∆V

ElectronsElectrons

IonsIons

60 %

40 %

25/07/2008 25/07/2008 -- SPIN 2008 PRAHA SPIN 2008 PRAHA 2424/30/30

THGEM

protection box

CsICsI evaporation at CERNevaporation at CERN(A. Braem, C. David, M. van Stenis)(A. Braem, C. David, M. van Stenis)

Approaching our goalApproaching our goal-- detect UV photonsdetect UV photons……

25/07/2008 25/07/2008 -- SPIN 2008 PRAHA SPIN 2008 PRAHA 2525/30/30

THE SMALL PROTOTYPE STRUCTURE THE SMALL PROTOTYPE STRUCTURE wireswires

11stst THGEM (THGEM (CsICsIhere,externalhere,externalface)face)

22ndnd THGEMTHGEM

collection anodecollection anode

apertures for gas apertures for gas circulationcirculation

readread--outout

Quartz radiator(truncated cone)

…… Cherenkov photonsCherenkov photons……

25/07/2008 25/07/2008 -- SPIN 2008 PRAHA SPIN 2008 PRAHA 2626/30/30

TEST BEAM SETTEST BEAM SET--UPUPFOR SMALL FOR SMALL PROTOTYPESPROTOTYPES

25/07/2008 25/07/2008 -- SPIN 2008 PRAHA SPIN 2008 PRAHA 2727/30/30

PerspectivesPerspectivesShort term plans:

- optimize the parameters of the THGEM with photoconverting CsIlayer to achieve maximum photoelectron collection efficiency

- optimize the parameters for the (double) THGEM to be used forthe amplification of the signal to provide large and stable gain

- produce a set 600 x 600 mm2 THGEMs and assemble them withstesalite spacer frames into first complete “full size” prototype chamber

Possible medium term project:- Upgrade of COMPASS RICH (~4m2) with the new photon detectorsin case the COMPASS Collaboration decides for it.

Longer term dream:- find a configuration to reduce the ion back-flow down to <10-5

and operate this large area detectors with visible photoconverter

25/07/2008 25/07/2008 -- SPIN 2008 PRAHA SPIN 2008 PRAHA 2828/30/30

600 mm

600 mm

THGEMsStesalite frames

1500 mm

Al frame

Anode pads

There is hope to use these detectors for detection of visible photons

……wewe’’re building full size prototype re building full size prototype

= COMPASS RICH1 size= COMPASS RICH1 size

25/07/2008 25/07/2008 -- SPIN 2008 PRAHA SPIN 2008 PRAHA 2929/30/30

ConclusionsConclusionsA third generation of gaseous Photon Detectors for RICHapplications, based on micropattern gas detectors, isexpected to overcome the performance limits of MWPC’scoupled with CsI photocathodes.THGEM seem to be very promising: they are stiff, robustand suitable for industrial production; they are expectedto provide high gain, small dead areas and very goodphotoelectron collection efficiencies.An effort to characterize these novel detectors has startedwith the aim to optimize geometrical parameters, productionprocedures and working conditions for large area coverage.A full size 600 x 600 mm2 prototype will be produced,assembled and tested in the incoming months.

25/07/2008 25/07/2008 -- SPIN 2008 PRAHA SPIN 2008 PRAHA 3030/30/30

Thanks to the help from many colleaguesThanks to the help from many colleagues……

M. Alexeeva, R. Birsab, F. Bradamantec, A. Bressanc, M. Chiossod,P. Cilibertic, G. Crocie, M. Colantonif, S. Dalla Torreb, S. Duarte Pintoe,O. Denisovf, V. Diazb, N. Dibiased, V. Duicc, A. Ferrerod, M. Fingerg,M. Finger Jrg, H. Fischerh,G. Giacominii,b, M. Giorgic, B. Gobbob,R. Hagemannh, F. H. Heinsiush, K. Königsmannh, D. Kramerj, S. Levoratoc,A. Maggioraf, A. Martinc, G. Menonb, A. Mutterh, F. Nerlingh, D. Panzieria,G. Pesaroc, J. Polakb,j, E. Roccod, L. Ropelewskie, P. Schiavonc, C. Schillh, M. S lunecka j , F . Sozz i c , L . Ste iger j ,M. Sulc j , S . Takekawac,F. Tessarottob, H. Wollnyh

a INFN, Sezione di Torino and University of East Piemonte, Alessandria, Italyb INFN, Sezione di Trieste, Trieste, Italyc INFN, Sezione di Trieste and University of Trieste, Trieste, Italyd INFN, Sezione di Torino and University of Torino, Torino, Italye CERN, European Organization for Nuclear Research, Geneva, Switzerlandf INFN, Sezione di Torino, Torino, Italyg Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic and JINR, Dubna, Russiah Universität Freiburg, Physikalisches Institut, Freiburg, Germanyi University of Bari, Bari, Italyj Technical University of Liberec, Liberec, Czech Republic

25/07/2008 25/07/2008 -- SPIN 2008 PRAHA SPIN 2008 PRAHA 3131/30/30

TThank you hank you