radiation exposure and mission strategies for ...nuclphys.sinp.msu.ru/conf/lpp14/round table... ·...

29
Radiation exposure and mission strategies for interplanetary manned missions and interplanetary habitats Piero Spillantini Univ. and INFN, Firenze, Italy Fourteenth Lomonosov Conference on Elementary Particle Physics, Moscow, August 19-25, 2009

Upload: others

Post on 17-Jul-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Radiation exposure and mission strategies for ...nuclphys.sinp.msu.ru/conf/lpp14/Round Table... · (1985-90 two feasibility study of the ASTROMAG facility for CR on board of the Freedom

Radiation exposure and mission strategies for interplanetary manned missions and interplanetary habitats

Piero SpillantiniUniv. and INFN, Firenze, Italy

Fourteenth Lomonosov Conference on Elementary Particle Physics,Moscow, August 19-25, 2009

Page 2: Radiation exposure and mission strategies for ...nuclphys.sinp.msu.ru/conf/lpp14/Round Table... · (1985-90 two feasibility study of the ASTROMAG facility for CR on board of the Freedom

10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 1 101 102 103 104

15

12

9

6

3

0

-3

-6

Log

inte

nsity

(p/ c

m2

srs M

eV)

Kinetic Energy (MeV)

Solar Wind(flux=1016fluxGCR)

SCR(fluxmax=106fluxGCR )

(ACR)GCR

Spectra of energetic c.rays (indicative)

Sporadic, unpredictable

Penetrating SS from outside≈ constant flux

Dangerous

Mainly protons

Comparison purpose

Page 3: Radiation exposure and mission strategies for ...nuclphys.sinp.msu.ru/conf/lpp14/Round Table... · (1985-90 two feasibility study of the ASTROMAG facility for CR on board of the Freedom

We are protected from GCR by:

At 1 AU (Earth orbit) by solar magnetic field (solar wind)

Near the Earth (about 10 REarth

) by terrestrial magnetic field

On the Earth surface by the Earth atmosphere

10-1 @ 1GeV10-2 @ 500 MeV

10-1 @ 1GeVAt 45º latitude

a further 10-2 @ all latitudes

Page 4: Radiation exposure and mission strategies for ...nuclphys.sinp.msu.ru/conf/lpp14/Round Table... · (1985-90 two feasibility study of the ASTROMAG facility for CR on board of the Freedom

Energy (Gev/nucleon)

x 10-1

Page 5: Radiation exposure and mission strategies for ...nuclphys.sinp.msu.ru/conf/lpp14/Round Table... · (1985-90 two feasibility study of the ASTROMAG facility for CR on board of the Freedom

Outside of the atmosphere

Top of the atmosphere(ballooning ≈ 40 km)(ballooning ≈ 25 km)

4 km on the sea level

≈1 G

eV(b

ulk)

10 km on the sea level

≈1 Z

eV

≈1 E

eV

≈1 P

eV

≈1 T

eV Energy of the primary CR(90% p, 9% Nuclei, <1% e,γ)

bulk

Showers of CR in the atmosphere

(x10-6

of bulk)

Page 6: Radiation exposure and mission strategies for ...nuclphys.sinp.msu.ru/conf/lpp14/Round Table... · (1985-90 two feasibility study of the ASTROMAG facility for CR on board of the Freedom

103

102

101

1200 400 600 800 1000depth through atmosphere gr/cm2

soft (≈e)

hard (≈μ)

π

n

soft n

soft p

primary (≈p)

1015 4

parti

cles

/(m2

s sr

)

2720

Km above the sea level

≈ x 10-2

Page 7: Radiation exposure and mission strategies for ...nuclphys.sinp.msu.ru/conf/lpp14/Round Table... · (1985-90 two feasibility study of the ASTROMAG facility for CR on board of the Freedom

Shielding in space is problematic:

Passive shielding (absorbers)enough for SCR (but huge masses needed)GCR very penetratingabsorbers inefficient (secondary production)

Active systems are necessary for long duration manned missions

Page 8: Radiation exposure and mission strategies for ...nuclphys.sinp.msu.ru/conf/lpp14/Round Table... · (1985-90 two feasibility study of the ASTROMAG facility for CR on board of the Freedom

60s 90s several ideas were considered, no technical projects(mainly in USA)(URSS: some work on superconductivity in space).

(1985-90 two feasibility study of the ASTROMAG facilityfor CR on board of the Freedom SS.)

Active protection from CR: historical introduction

Page 9: Radiation exposure and mission strategies for ...nuclphys.sinp.msu.ru/conf/lpp14/Round Table... · (1985-90 two feasibility study of the ASTROMAG facility for CR on board of the Freedom

2002-2004 ESA international Topical Team on “Shielding from the cosmic radiation for interplanetary missions: active and passive methods”

2000 review of available techniques and optimization of the working point for superconducting magnets for space applications (INFN-Milan (L.Rossi and L.Imbasciati))

2003-2004 WP “Review and development of active shielding concepts” of the contract REMSIM (Radiation Exposure and Mission Strategies for Interpl. Manned Missions) ESA-Alenia (+EADS Astrium, REM, RxTec, INFN).

Page 10: Radiation exposure and mission strategies for ...nuclphys.sinp.msu.ru/conf/lpp14/Round Table... · (1985-90 two feasibility study of the ASTROMAG facility for CR on board of the Freedom

B=0 inside

B ∝1/R

B=0 outside

B=0 outside

B

R

electric currentelectric current

R1 R2

R1 R2

Continuous cilindrical conductor

Lumped conductors

Page 11: Radiation exposure and mission strategies for ...nuclphys.sinp.msu.ru/conf/lpp14/Round Table... · (1985-90 two feasibility study of the ASTROMAG facility for CR on board of the Freedom

'Shelter' (Φ=2m, length 3m):shield masses for H20 & Toroid

1

10

100

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800K.E. cut [MeV]

mas

s [t]

H2OToroid R2=3m cold massToroid R2=3m envisaged total massToroid R2=3m maximum total mass

6m2mshelter

Hp:NbSn sc cable Al sabilizedsc cable current ≤500 A/mm2CFSM (cryocoolers)

Page 12: Radiation exposure and mission strategies for ...nuclphys.sinp.msu.ru/conf/lpp14/Round Table... · (1985-90 two feasibility study of the ASTROMAG facility for CR on board of the Freedom

Fig.6.14 - Toroidal shelter (∅ 2m, length 3m) integrated in the habitat scheme of the AURORA CDF concept. At the outer diameter the electric current can be supposed to be returned by a few conductors.

Page 13: Radiation exposure and mission strategies for ...nuclphys.sinp.msu.ru/conf/lpp14/Round Table... · (1985-90 two feasibility study of the ASTROMAG facility for CR on board of the Freedom

'Habitat' (Φ=4m, length 5m): H2O & Toroid shield masses

1

10

100

0 200 400 600 800 1000K.E. cut [MeV]

mas

s [t]

H2O shieldToroid R2=4m cold massToroid R2=4m envisaged total mass

8m4mhabitat

Hp:NbSn sc cable Al sabilizedsc cable current ≤500 A/mm2CFSM (cryocoolers)

Page 14: Radiation exposure and mission strategies for ...nuclphys.sinp.msu.ru/conf/lpp14/Round Table... · (1985-90 two feasibility study of the ASTROMAG facility for CR on board of the Freedom

The studies of the past must be updated for several reasons:

Future missions will be more and more addressed to the use of space as a ‘forth dimension’,

such as a collective property for implementing services of economical and social benefit

involving more and more private investments,with the Space agencies supplying the needed technical competences, quaranties and controls

in conformity with the political indications of the respective governments

Remarkable technical developments of high temperature superconductors (in particular MgB2 material) andof the cooling technique (cryocoolers for the N2 shielding of AMS-2)

Realization and operation of huge volume and stored energy superconducting magnets for

elementary particle physics experiments

Page 15: Radiation exposure and mission strategies for ...nuclphys.sinp.msu.ru/conf/lpp14/Round Table... · (1985-90 two feasibility study of the ASTROMAG facility for CR on board of the Freedom

First instances of space tourism

Signals in this direction:

Successes of the SpaceShipTwo private spacecraft

Sudies for the use of Moon for extraction of useful materials (e.g.He3)

Studies for the ‘production’ of large quantity of water on the Moon

‘MoonBase’ initiative activities

Awareness of the importance of using the Lagrange points forachieving scientific results and for supporting commercial activities

(e.g L1 for Moon, and Space Highways for transfer of materials)

Page 16: Radiation exposure and mission strategies for ...nuclphys.sinp.msu.ru/conf/lpp14/Round Table... · (1985-90 two feasibility study of the ASTROMAG facility for CR on board of the Freedom

Expected evolution of human presence in space:

Space Stations astronauts

Space bases astronauts and specialized personnel

Space ‘complexes’ astronauts, specialized personnel and common citizens

Page 17: Radiation exposure and mission strategies for ...nuclphys.sinp.msu.ru/conf/lpp14/Round Table... · (1985-90 two feasibility study of the ASTROMAG facility for CR on board of the Freedom

further step in GCR protection:

Long permanence in ‘deep’ spacenot only

for a relatively small number of astronauts but also

for citizens conducting ‘normal’ activities

Minimum basic assumptions for the ‘habitat’:

Volume to be protected: Ǿ ≥6m, L=10mShroud of the transportation system: Ǿ 10m, L>16m

Page 18: Radiation exposure and mission strategies for ...nuclphys.sinp.msu.ru/conf/lpp14/Round Table... · (1985-90 two feasibility study of the ASTROMAG facility for CR on board of the Freedom

i

i

i

i

L≈16÷20m

R1=

3m

B

B

R2=

5m

longitudinal section

Shieldedvolume

Transverse section

Shielded volume

RRRBRB 11)()( ∗

=

Page 19: Radiation exposure and mission strategies for ...nuclphys.sinp.msu.ru/conf/lpp14/Round Table... · (1985-90 two feasibility study of the ASTROMAG facility for CR on board of the Freedom

p flux with H2O and toroidal cuts

0

0,5

1

1,5

2

2,5

10 100 1000 10000KE cut [MeV]

flux

[p/(m

2srs

MeV

)]

no cutcut 90 MeVtoroid 'Ecut=90 MeV' GCR:

dose reductionbetween

absorber cut and toroid cut

28%

Page 20: Radiation exposure and mission strategies for ...nuclphys.sinp.msu.ru/conf/lpp14/Round Table... · (1985-90 two feasibility study of the ASTROMAG facility for CR on board of the Freedom

galactic proton flux in the 'habitat' (R1=3m, R2=5m)

0

0,5

1

1,5

2

2,5

10 100 1000 10000KE [MeV]

flux

[p/(c

m2s

rsM

eV)]

R1=3m R2=5m B1=0T R1=3m R2=5m B1=1TR1=3m R2=5m B1=2T R1=3m R2=5m B1=4TR1=3m R2=5m B1=6T R1=3m R2=5m B1=8TR1=3m R2=5m B1=10T

10m6mhabitat

15% 34% 59% 85%75%80%

GCR dose (Gy) reduction

Page 21: Radiation exposure and mission strategies for ...nuclphys.sinp.msu.ru/conf/lpp14/Round Table... · (1985-90 two feasibility study of the ASTROMAG facility for CR on board of the Freedom

Ideal cable

MgB2 ≈ 20 %

Al ≈ 55 %

Ti ≈ 25 %

Characteristic Value

Averaged density 2,96 g/cm3

Diameter of the cable 200 μmSection of MgB2 6,28·10-3 mm2

Operation temperature 20 KCritical current at 2 T 1,3·103

A/mm2

Technological criteria

- Cryogen Free Superconducting Magnet - cryocoolers

-‘ideal cable’ for space applications (Turin university + Alenia)thin MgB2 cable produced by the in-situ method in a titanium sheathstabilized outside in aluminum:

- Medium operating temperature (20k)

- Low density (3 g/cm3)

- Small section: cables less sufferingcurrent and temperature instability,and distributing current in thesurrounding cables in case of badfunctioning.

Page 22: Radiation exposure and mission strategies for ...nuclphys.sinp.msu.ru/conf/lpp14/Round Table... · (1985-90 two feasibility study of the ASTROMAG facility for CR on board of the Freedom

mass for R1=3m

1

10

100

0 2 4 6 8 10 12B(R1) (T)

mas

s (t)

<B>*L=6,1 Tm dose red 0.59<B>*L=12.5 Tm dose red 0.82<B>*L=20,3 Tm dose red 0.87

R2=5m6m7m8m10m

Cold mass for current density in sc cable 1kA/mm2 @ 2T

Cold Mass=62 t35 t24 t19 t14 t

Page 23: Radiation exposure and mission strategies for ...nuclphys.sinp.msu.ru/conf/lpp14/Round Table... · (1985-90 two feasibility study of the ASTROMAG facility for CR on board of the Freedom

Minimum basic assumptions for the ‘habitat’:

Volume to be protected: Ǿ ≥6m, L=10mShroud of the transportation system: Ǿ 10m, L>16m

However: deployment of return current circuit must be consideredfrom the very beginning

Page 24: Radiation exposure and mission strategies for ...nuclphys.sinp.msu.ru/conf/lpp14/Round Table... · (1985-90 two feasibility study of the ASTROMAG facility for CR on board of the Freedom

closed configuration

deployed configuration

Ǿ 10mǾ 6m

L=10

mǾ 6mǾ >>10m

L=10

m

shroud

habitat

habitathabitat

habitat habitat

Inner conductor

Inner conductorouter conductorouter conductors

Page 25: Radiation exposure and mission strategies for ...nuclphys.sinp.msu.ru/conf/lpp14/Round Table... · (1985-90 two feasibility study of the ASTROMAG facility for CR on board of the Freedom

B=0 inside

B ∝1/R

B=0 inside

B ∝1/R

a) b)

electric current

retu

rn o

f the

ele

ctri

c cu

rren

t

retu

rn o

f the

ele

ctri

c cu

rren

t

- in a toroidal configuration the field diminishes at the increasing of the radius, making easier to support the ponderomotive forces.

- the outer part of the system must be deployed or assembled in space.

Page 26: Radiation exposure and mission strategies for ...nuclphys.sinp.msu.ru/conf/lpp14/Round Table... · (1985-90 two feasibility study of the ASTROMAG facility for CR on board of the Freedom

Basic philosophy for the ‘Space Complex’:

All the modules linked to the protected ‘habitat’Protected ‘habitat’ can be reached in a few minutes

from any point of the Space Complex‘Habitat’ fully protected from SCR’s.‘Habitat’ guaranties a factor 5 reduction of GCR dose @ solar minimum

Furthermore:

Journeys during periods of maximum solar activity

Long permanences (>1 year) during periods of maximum solar activity

Page 27: Radiation exposure and mission strategies for ...nuclphys.sinp.msu.ru/conf/lpp14/Round Table... · (1985-90 two feasibility study of the ASTROMAG facility for CR on board of the Freedom

Cross section ofthe habitat

protected againstSCR and GCR

Units protected onlyagainst SCR events

Communication tunnels

Page 28: Radiation exposure and mission strategies for ...nuclphys.sinp.msu.ru/conf/lpp14/Round Table... · (1985-90 two feasibility study of the ASTROMAG facility for CR on board of the Freedom

Sheltersagainst SCR events

Page 29: Radiation exposure and mission strategies for ...nuclphys.sinp.msu.ru/conf/lpp14/Round Table... · (1985-90 two feasibility study of the ASTROMAG facility for CR on board of the Freedom

Furthermore protection from CR is

- a ‘niche’ where physicists can contribute - an occasion of collaboration between labs and space agencies- new technologies to be developped for space propulsion

(magnetic lenses to control divergence and density of chargedmaterial for real-time control of thrust and direction,to concentrate it in small volume for further acceleration, magnetic bottle for suitable reactions, etc..)

Conclusions

An adequate protection from GCR to a large human community in space is a complex problem, which can be solved in an adequate time provided that a long program of study and R&D will be set up

in due time and with the due resources.

It is therefore urgent a professional approach toward the study,project, realization and test of materials, mechanisms, systems,

and finally ‘space demonstrators’, and their integration in manned exploration programs.