r1-a.1: characterization of explosives & precursors · 2016. 10. 4. · tion following initial...

16
R1-A.1: Characterization of Explosives & Precursors I. PARTICIPANTS Faculty/Staff Name Title Institution Email Jimmie Oxley Co-PI URI [email protected] Jim Smith Co-PI URI [email protected] Gerald Kagan Post-Doc URI [email protected] Graduate, Undergraduate and REU Students Name Degree Pursued Institution Month/Year of Graduation Matt Porter PhD URI 8/2017 Austin Brown PhD URI 8/2017 Kevin Colizza PhD URI 5/2018 Lindsay McLennan PhD URI 5/2018 Devon Swanson PhD URI 8/2016 II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. Project Overview All new materials require characterization; but in the case of explosives, complete characterization is espe- cially important due to safety concerns—safety for those who handle the materials and for those who must mitigate its performance. In the case of homemade explosives (HMEs), the materials are not necessarily new (many were reported in the late 1800s). In recent years, the capture of terrorist facilities has resulted in “routine” conϐiscation of HMEs by counterterrorism units. Accidents have been reported that emphasize the importance of safe methods for detection, identiϐication and destruction of HMEs. To detect, destroy, handle safely, or prevent the synthesis of HMEs, complete understanding involves answer- ing the following questions: How are the HMEs formed and what accelerates or retards formation? How do HMEs decompose and what accelerates or retards decomposition? How do the HMEs crystallize? What are the vapor pressures and headspace signatures of HMEs? What is the density? What are the sensitivities to accidental ignition and purposeful ignition? How will HMEs perform under shock and ϐire conditions? Answering such questions is overarching to this project, and each year we continue to make progress. Pre- viously, we have examined triacetone triperoxide (TATP). Our detailed examination of TATP has resulted in a dozen publications and led to a method of preparing safe, long-lasting training aids for canine and explo- ALERT Phase 2 Year 3 Annual Report Appendix A: Project Reports Thrust R1: Characterization & Elimination of Illicit Explosives Project R1-A.1

Upload: others

Post on 17-Feb-2021

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • R1-A.1: Characterization of Explosives & Precursors

    I. PARTICIPANTS

    Faculty/Staff Name Title Institution Email

    Jimmie Oxley Co-PI URI [email protected]

    Jim Smith Co-PI URI [email protected]

    Gerald Kagan Post-Doc URI [email protected]

    Graduate, Undergraduate and REU StudentsName Degree Pursued Institution Month/Year of Graduation

    Matt Porter PhD URI 8/2017

    Austin Brown PhD URI 8/2017

    Kevin Colizza PhD URI 5/2018

    Lindsay McLennan PhD URI 5/2018

    Devon Swanson PhD URI 8/2016

    II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION

    A. Project Overview

    All new materials require characterization; but in the case of explosives, complete characterization is espe-cially important due to safety concerns—safety for those who handle the materials and for those who must mitigate its performance. In the case of homemade explosives (HMEs), the materials are not necessarily new (many were reported in the late 1800s). In recent years, the capture of terrorist facilities has resulted in “routine” con iscation of HMEs by counterterrorism units. Accidents have been reported that emphasize the importance of safe methods for detection, identi ication and destruction of HMEs.To detect, destroy, handle safely, or prevent the synthesis of HMEs, complete understanding involves answer-ing the following questions:• How are the HMEs formed and what accelerates or retards formation? • How do HMEs decompose and what accelerates or retards decomposition?• How do the HMEs crystallize?• What are the vapor pressures and headspace signatures of HMEs?• What is the density?• What are the sensitivities to accidental ignition and purposeful ignition?• How will HMEs perform under shock and ire conditions?Answering such questions is overarching to this project, and each year we continue to make progress. Pre-viously, we have examined triacetone triperoxide (TATP). Our detailed examination of TATP has resulted in a dozen publications and led to a method of preparing safe, long-lasting training aids for canine and explo-

    ALERT Phase 2 Year 3 Annual Report

    Appendix A: Project Reports Thrust R1: Characterization & Elimination of Illicit Explosives

    Project R1-A.1

  • sives detection instruments [1-12]. Erythritol tetranitrate (ETN), a compound chemically similar to the well-known explosive pentaerythritol tetranitrate (PETN), has been brie ly examined and reported [13]. Charac-terization will be ongoing in the coming year. We have also amassed extensive data of thermal properties of fuel/oxidizer (FOX) mixtures [14]. Building on these results, we hope to develop a better understanding of the detonability of FOX mixtures. This year, we have devoted considerable effort in developing methods for analysis of peroxide explosives, especially hexamethylene triperoxide diamine (HMTD) [15, 16]. The latter studies are summarized below.Many laboratories which work directly or indirectly on homeland security issues are not able to purchase or store explosives, especially HMEs. Our database provides a valuable service to those laboratories. Stan-dard chemical properties are measured and uploaded to a database for assessment by registered users. In addition, protocols are available as to how to perform chemical analyses in the laboratory. In some cases, personnel have trained in University of Rhode Island (URI) laboratories. Disposal of small quantities of HMEs can also be a concern. Information on chemical digestion of unwanted HMEs is also available. Research on FOX mixtures is a ield with little de initive information but much speculation in terms of what “works” and what “ought to work”. Our research in this area has two goals: (1) To allow the homeland security enterprise (HSE) to narrow or widen the list of threat oxidizers; and (2) To collect and match suf icient small-scale data to large-scale performance so that small-scale data has greater relevance in predicting magnitude of large scale events. R1-A.1 is currently focused on HMTD formation, decomposition, and vapor composition of headspace. Publi-cations regarding our indings can be found in Section III. One of our irst approaches to the study of HMTD was the examination of analysis methods. HMTD exhibits an unusual gas phase phenomenon in the presence of alcohols. We used positive ion mode atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI) liquid-chromatogra-phy-mass–spectrometry (LC-MS) to examine this behavior. HMTD was infused with various solvents, includ-ing 18O and 2H labeled methanol, and based on the labeled experiments, it was determined that under APCI conditions, the alcohol oxygen attacks a methylene carbon of HMTD and releases H2O2 [15]. Interestingly, our work this year has found it necessary to further examine our methods of analyzing peroxide explosives. We now report, in a manuscript in preparation, that certain popular solvents suppress ionization of cyclic peroxides by positive ion APCI LC-MS. This inding affects not only researchers in the homeland security en-terprise, but those in the ield of forensics and possibly (although yet unknown) those involved in detection techniques involving ionization (e.g. ion mobility spectrometry).Our work continued to study synthesis and decomposition of HMTD in condensed phase. Mechanisms have been proposed based on isotopic labeling and mass spectral interpretation of both condensed phase products and headspace products. Formation of HMTD from hexamine appeared to proceed from dissociated hexam-ine, as evident from the scrambling of the 15N label when synthesis was carried out with equal molar labeled/unlabeled hexamine. The decomposition of HMTD was considered with additives, and in the presence and absence of moisture. In addition to mass spectral interpretation, researchers in Project R1-D.1 used density functional theory (DFT) to calculate energy differences of transition states and the entropies of intermediates along the decomposition pathway. HMTD is dramatically destabilized by water and all acids, making puri ica-tion following initial synthesis essential in order to avoid unanticipated violent reactions [16].

    B. Biennial Review Results and Related Actions to Address

    Transition via the University of Rhode Island’s Explosives Database, an interactive library of continuously updated analytical data for explosive and energetic compounds, is highly regarded. There was a request to track the number of users, which we have already addressed (there are approximately 950 users), and the number of hits per a given time frame. The latter feature has been addressed since that review.One reviewer sought clari ication on our strategies to prioritize research topics (i.e. HMEs). It was suggested we directly solicit the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) for selection of our topics. Although that is

    ALERT Phase 2 Year 3 Annual Report

    Appendix A: Project Reports Thrust R1: Characterization & Elimination of Illicit Explosives

    Project R1-A.1

  • implied in the submission and approval of work plans, emails were sent to Dr. Laura Parker, our Program Manager, and Ms. Elizabeth Obregan, as suggested in the review. In addition, we have attended the Septem-ber 2015 HMEs meeting organized by the Combating Terrorism Technical Support Of ice (CTTSO) and DHS, and also attended the CTTSO HME meeting in May 2016. The R1 thrust area constantly seeks updates regard-ing threats in need of study and is open to suggestions at any time. The interest expressed by reviewers in further studies of FOX mixtures, as well as on peroxide explosives, will be addressed in the coming year. Finally, coordination with other R1 projects will be enhanced by periodic meetings of R1 members.

    C. State of the Art and Technical Approach

    Physical characterization includes infrared (IR), Raman, 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopy, and mass spectrom-etry. These properties are measured and made available to the HSE and forensic labs through our continu-ously updated online database. Also available to the users are analytical methods. Other essential properties include thermal stability under various conditions, heats of combustion, decomposition, and detonation, as well as measurement of destructive outcomes. As discussed below, our database has over 950 subscribers and is well-regarded. In the last year, we have been asked to review more than 40 papers dealing with explo-sives, and recently one of our principal investigators has been named to the editorial boards of both Forensic Chemistry and Central European Journal of Energetic Materials. These activities serve to keep us abreast of the latest explosive work world-wide.

    C.1. HMTD studies

    C.1.a. Rationale and approach for HMTD studies

    Several accidents involving counterterrorism personnel handling HMTD (see Fig. 1) have motivated studies to better understand its chemistry and, for the purposes of detection, to identify its signature under a variety of conditions [16]. The chemistry and decomposition of HMTD in the presence of a number of chemicals was probed. It was found that moisture and acid enhanced its decomposition. Furthermore, oxidation of hexam-ine by hydrogen peroxide to form HMTD could be catalyzed by any acid, not just citric acid. This expansion of the potential precursor list may be important to the HSE.

    A mechanism for HMTD formation had been proposed based on data from isotopic ratio mass spectrometry [17]. Because this proposed mechanism involved formation of a triperoxy tertiary amine and protonated methylene imine, both of which we thought unlikely, we looked for alternative mechanistic pathways. Tenta-tive proposals are discussed in Reference 16. Figure 2 illustrates the route most in line with the isotopic label studies. Hexamine is broken into small molecules, and from the formaldehyde/hydrogen peroxide reaction, bis(hydroxymethyl) peroxide (BHMP) is formed, while from the imine/ hydrogen peroxide reaction, bis(me-thylamine) peroxide is formed. The latter reacts with two molecules of BHMP to create HMTD. This mecha-

    Figure 1: HMTD structure.

    ALERT Phase 2 Year 3 Annual Report

    Appendix A: Project Reports Thrust R1: Characterization & Elimination of Illicit Explosives

    Project R1-A.1

  • nism is in line with the fact that the reaction proceeds to HMTD faster in the presence of excess formaldehyde. The key to this proposed mechanism is the formation of BHMP, irst synthesized in 1914 by Fenton from hy-drogen peroxide and formaldehyde and later studied by Satter ield [18]. It is likely this species was generated in situ as reported for syntheses of several caged peroxides having planar bridgehead nitrogen atoms [19]. Once a methylene is lost from hexamine to form formaldehyde, the resulting octahydro-1,3,5,7-tetrazocine would be subject to rapid ring inversion and isomerization, which BHMP can bridge across two nitrogen at-oms. To shed light on how HMTD decomposes, density functional theory (DFT) calculations were performed by R1-D.1 team members [16].

    C.1.b. HMTD headspace studies

    We had previously reported that HMTD decomposition could be readily observed at 60°C; and we had ob-served that when HMTD was removed from storage at -15 °C (freezer temperature), it developed a noticeable odor after a couple of hours. Headspace gases were collected using gas-tight syringes or solid phase micro-extraction (SPME) ibers. The former was used for permanent gases; the latter for volatile amines. When HMTD was heated under a variety of conditions, the predominant decomposition products observed in the headspace were trimethylamine (TMA) and dimethylformamide (DMF) with trace quantities of ethylenimine (EN), methyl formamide (MFM), formamide (FM), hexamine, and with moisture, 1-methyl-1H-1,2,4-triazole and pyrazine. No oxygen or nitrogen was found, but carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide had evolved in signi icant amounts. Surprisingly, no HMTD was observed under dry, moist, acidic, or basic conditions. This raised concerns about whether molecular HMTD could be found in the headspace, or whether it had decom-posed under our analytical protocols. Therefore, we used the same gas chromatography and mass spectrom-etry (GC/MS) conditions to inject a solution of HMTD; the molecular ion was observed, leading us to conclude that if it existed in the vapor headspace, it was below our methods of detection. However, MIT Lincoln Labs has recently performed experiments which allow its vapor pressure to be estimated at the parts-per-trillion level. [20]Due to our previous studies on HMTD [21- 24], we were asked to join the Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) in a detailed examination of the vapor headspace of HMTD. Generally, for the sake of safety, we recrystallize (purify) our HMEs before we conduct studies. If we examine the effects of a particular impurity, it is added to the puri ied material of interest. HMTD is only soluble in polar solvents such as ethyl acetate; and recrys-tallizing from that solvent, despite herculean efforts, results in the unavoidable appearance of that solvent in the headspace. In our present study, we are examining both the crude and the recrystallized HMTD to deter-mine whether there are signi icant differences. In one experiment, HMTD was prepared and allowed to age at room temperature. Within a month, at humid conditions, minor amounts of the decomposition product, formamide appeared in the HMTD headspace. In addition, signi icant amounts of ethyl acetate appeared in

    Figure 2: Formation of HMTD from completely dissociated hexamine.

    ALERT Phase 2 Year 3 Annual Report

    Appendix A: Project Reports Thrust R1: Characterization & Elimination of Illicit Explosives

    Project R1-A.1

  • the headspace of the recrystallized sample (see Fig. 3). The early formation of formamide, rather than the dominant inal product dimethylformamide, suggests an Eschweiler-Clarke type reaction where the initially formed amine is methylated in the presence of formic acid and formaldehyde (see Scheme 1).

    A more troubling observation is that decomposition occurs rapidly at ambient humidity. However, this means that instruments and dogs should readily be able to detect HMTD since major decomposition products are highly odiferous.

    C.1.c. Mass spectral analysis of condensed-phase decomposition products

    We have examined condensed-phase products of HMTD heated at 60°C under various conditions by gas and liquid chromatography with mass spectrometry; GC/MS and LC/MS, respectively. Figure 4 shows some prod-ucts formed exclusively under moist conditions; and others only under dry conditions.

    Scheme 1

    Figure 3: Gas chromatography of 1-day old HMTD—crude and recrystallized.

    ALERT Phase 2 Year 3 Annual Report

    Appendix A: Project Reports Thrust R1: Characterization & Elimination of Illicit Explosives

    Project R1-A.1

  • During efforts to analyze trace levels of cyclic peroxides by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry, we found that even minor amounts (2%) of acetonitrile suppressed ion formation (see Fig. 5 on the next page). Further investigations extended this discovery to ketones, linear peroxides, esters, and possibly many other types of compounds including triazole and menadione. Direct ionization suppression caused by acetoni-trile was observed for multiple adduct types in both electrospray ionization (ESI) and atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI). The addition of only 2% acetonitrile signi icantly decreased the sensitivity of an-alyte response. Efforts to identify the mechanism were attempted using various nitriles. The ion suppression was reduced by substitution of hydrogen with an electron-withdrawing group on acetonitrile, but was exac-erbated by electron-donating or steric groups adjacent to the nitrile. While current theory does not explain this phenomenon, we propose that polar interactions between the various functionalities and the nitrile may be forming neutral aggregates contributing to ionization suppression.

    Figure 4: Condensed-phase decomposition products of HMTD under dry and humid conditions.

    ALERT Phase 2 Year 3 Annual Report

    Appendix A: Project Reports Thrust R1: Characterization & Elimination of Illicit Explosives

    Project R1-A.1

  • D. Major Contributions

    In April 2015, we were thanked by a National Institute of Standards & Technology (NIST) senior scientist for allowing them to use our database of explosive properties. They stated: “It was all we had, in many cases.” This is high praise from an organization which maintains the “Chemistry Webbook.” In the past, we have also received similar acclaim from military labs, both in CONUS and OCONUS. Other forms of outreach include the following topics: • Extensive TATP characterization—safe scent aids, gentle destruction (Y1-3)• The limitations of certain oxidizers in terms of terrorist use (Y1-2)• Baseline information about HMTD chemical properties and reactivity. (Y1-3)• Identifying the hazards of humidity to HMTD (Y2-3)• Formation mechanism of HMTD. (Y2-3)• Gentle destruction methods for HMTD. (Y3-4)• Safe-scent aids for HMTD (Y3-4)• Revealing modes by which the peroxide explosive signature can be masked by solvent (Y3-4)

    Figure 5: Acetonitrile (ACN) suppression of the HMTD cation.

    ALERT Phase 2 Year 3 Annual Report

    Appendix A: Project Reports Thrust R1: Characterization & Elimination of Illicit Explosives

    Project R1-A.1

  • We have characterized the headspace over HMTD; the amount of HMTD in the vapor is estimated to be sub-parts-per-trillion [20]. The odor associated with HMTD is due to amine decomposition products. Thus, the amine decomposition products can be used to generate the odor, making canine training aids from non-ex-plosive components feasible. In contrast to early literature [25], HMTD should not be stored under water. It rapidly decomposes in the presence of moisture. HMTD is thermally unstable. Under dry conditions, it begins to decompose slightly when isolated; in high humidity, its duration may be as short as one week. This is in strong contrast to all military explosives and most HMEs. A number of decomposition and formation experiments have been performed with HMTD. Most notable were the studies using isotopically labeled species. Among those, the examination of the formation of HMTD using hexamine labeled with 15N as well as unlabeled 14N hexamine suggested that the formation of HMTD might be accomplished from any source of formaldehyde. While this is not necessarily good news for counterterrorism forces, at least it helps de ine the magnitude of the problem.Because HMTD is destabilized by water and citric acid, it is important to purify it after initial synthesis. Ignoring the degrading effects of acid and humidity can lead to unexpected violent reactions. Precautions should be taken to see that HMTD remains dry. The headspace (signature) of HMTD is mainly trimethylamine (TMA) and dimethylformamide (DMF), and these might be used for canine and other vapor detection training instead of the more hazardous HMTD. Further work is underway to clarify mechanisms of HMTD decomposi-tion. Preventing the assembly of formaldehyde into the molecule HMTD will continue as an ultimate research goal.A dozen FOX mixtures have been examined via both Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) and Simultane-ous Differential Thermolysis (SDT) and, for a few, burn characteristics were determined. This is the start of an initiative to determine the range of the threat in terms of oxidizers for use in FOX explosives. Materials, such as dichromate, appear to have little energy to contribute to an explosion, but other properties are being explored. Development of analytical protocols for the cyclic peroxides continues. Also, investigations of the extent to which these materials can be masked by choice in solvent continues.

    E. Milestones

    Studies to thwart the synthesis of HMTD are challenging. Continued mechanistic studies are underway to devise best approaches to this problem. Headspace investigations of HMTD continue to aid mechanistic stud-ies, as well as support creation of safe-scent aids for HMTD. In Year 3, studies were initiated to determine oxidizers considered as potential threat materials; which fuels work best with these oxidizers; and what concentrations or FOX ratios are most effective. The completion of this study is a major milestone to be achieved in Years 4 and 5. Characterization will continue, speci ically to determine the amount of gas formed. This project will remain a lab study with improved pressure/heat production being the important criteria to move forward to future ield tests (see project R1-B.1). Long term commitment to this project is essential to the war against terrorism. Ultimately, detonation testing, albeit on the small-scale (see project R1-B.1), will be necessary to prove whether or not a FOX formulation is deton-able, but we are looking for observable characteristics at the lab-scale that suggest the inal outcome. Deter-mining these characteristics is indispensable to the counterterrorism community.

    F. Future Plans

    Greater understanding of HMTD formation and destruction remains a primary goal. Secondary milestones are to prevent its formation and to gently destroy it. Field work continues in an attempt to determine hazards associated with proposed methods of destruction. Work on safe, long-lived canine training aids for HMTD is progressing.

    ALERT Phase 2 Year 3 Annual Report

    Appendix A: Project Reports Thrust R1: Characterization & Elimination of Illicit Explosives

    Project R1-A.1

  • Thermal properties of FOX mixtures have been characterized. Yet, energy release alone does not appear to separate potential explosive precursors from other oxidizers; thus, gas release and rates of reactions mea-surements (see project R1-B.1) are planned. New methods of assessing oxidizing power are being formulated and links between small-scale laboratory behavior and large-scale ield performance are being evaluated.Erythritol tetranitrate (ETN), a compound chemically similar to more familiar PETN, has been brie ly exam-ined and reported upon [13]. It will be further examined in the coming year of this program. Similarly, in a previous year, a study was undertaken of the thermal properties of fuel/oxidizer (FOX) mixtures [14]. In the coming year, work aimed at understanding detonability will build upon those thermal studies.

    III. RELEVANCE AND TRANSITION

    A. Relevance of Research to the DHS Enterprise

    • R1-A.1 addresses the characterization of HMEs. Metrics include:o Downloads of our papers; o Users of the explosive database; ando Requests to license the database.o Requests for classes.

    • R1-A.1 is addressing the need for safe explosive scent materials. Metrics include:o Requests from explosive trace detection (ETD) instrument vendors for the scent product. Product is

    currently provided for free and we are under licensing negotiations;

    o Requests to license the product; and o A $10,000 award for this technology in student innovation contest April 2014.

    • R1-A.1 addresses the safe disposal of explosives.

    B. Potential for Transition

    • R1-A.1 addresses the characterization of HMEs. We receive requests to license the database.• R1-A.1 addresses safe samples of explosive. We receive requests to license our safe source of explosive

    vapor.• R1-A.1 addresses the sampling of explosives. We received a DHS BAA award with transition partners,

    FLIR and DSA.

    C. Data and/or IP Acquisition Strategy

    Patent and licensing issues are being addressed.

    D. Transition Pathway

    • R1-A.1 addresses the characterization of HMEs. There are requests to license the database; however, we are considering whether this would remove the present control we have on who can access the database.

    • R1-A.1 addresses safe samples of explosive. We have received requests to license the safe-scent product and are working with a potential vendor, although the product is presently available for free to those requesting it.

    ALERT Phase 2 Year 3 Annual Report

    Appendix A: Project Reports Thrust R1: Characterization & Elimination of Illicit Explosives

    Project R1-A.1

  • E. Transition Partner or Customer Connections

    There is a substantial interest associated with the Explosives Database and the explosive classes. U.S. contacts include Coast Guard, ATF, DHS, TSA, DOT, NIST, NASA, most national labs (LANL, SNL, PNNL, BNL Savannah River, Oak Ridge) and various army, navy and air force laboratories in the CONUS and OCONUS.

    IV. PROJECT ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND DOCUMENTATION

    A. Education and Workforce Development Activities

    1. Course, Seminar, or Workshop Developmenta. In May 2015, a hands-on course entitled “Explosives Analysis” was offered for the irst time; six

    members of the HSE came to URI to attend. This class was offered again in May 2016 and enroll-ment had to be capped at 23.

    b. “Advanced Hazard Recognition” was offered for the irst time to the Massachusetts JHAT team (HazMat specialists who travel with the state bomb squad). Twelve attended on May 12, 2016.

    c. Ten specialist classes were presented and reached about 230 people in the HSE. d. Invited Lectures:

    i. Oxley, Jimmie, “Bombmaking 101: The Internet.” International Association of Bomb Techni-cians & Investigators, Halifax, CA, July 18-22, 2016.

    ii. Oxley, Jimmie, “Why Study Energetic Materials?” Chemistry Spring Colloquium, Wesleyan University, April 29, 2016.

    iii. Oxley, Jimmie, “Energetic Materials Research at URI.” U.S. Coast Guard Academy, New Lon-don, CT, January 21, 2016.

    2. Student Internship, Job, and/or Research OpportunitiesEach URI project supports one or more graduate students. This is their best learning experience. Un-dergraduates are also supported on the projects as their class schedules permit. Graduated student, Stephanie Rayome obtained a job with Virginia State Forensic Lab in February 2016.

    3. Interactions and Outreach to K-12, Community College, and/or Minority Serving Institution Stu-dents or FacultyWe have continued our K-12 outreach by hosting high school teachers in the summer and providing chemical magic shows at K-12 schools. High school teachers conduct research in URI labs for 8 to 10 weeks under the mentorship of a graduate student. As a result, 2 teachers have gone back to seek advanced degrees. In summer of 2015, we hosted two Navy midshipmen and a Penn State engineer. A professor of en-gineering from NMT with two students will spend the summer of 2016 in our lab.

    4. Training to Professionals or OthersWe trained 44 TSS-ES in two classes and approximately 230 people total involved in the HSE in ten classes.The Massachusetts State Bomb squad/JHAT team spent May 12, 2016 in our labs for a short course on Advanced Hazards Recognition.

    ALERT Phase 2 Year 3 Annual Report

    Appendix A: Project Reports Thrust R1: Characterization & Elimination of Illicit Explosives

    Project R1-A.1

  • See additional information under Section IV.E.

    B. Peer Reviewed Journal Articles

    1. Oxley, Jimmie C.; Smith, James L.; Donnelly, Maria A.; Colizza, Kevin; Rayome, Stephanie. “Thermal Stability Studies Comparing IMX-101 (Dinitroanisole/Nitroguanidine/NTO) to Analogous Formula-tions Containing Dinitrotoluene.” Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics, February 2016, 41(1), 98-113. DOI: 10.1002/prep.201500150

    2. Oxley, Jimmie C.; Smith, James L.; Porter, Matthew; McLennan, Lindsay; Colizza, Kevin; Zeiri, Yehu-da; Kosloff, Ronnie; Dubnikova, Faina. “Synthesis and Degradation of Hexamethylene Triperoxide Diamine (HMTD).” Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics, April 2016, 41(2), 334-350. DOI: 10.1002/prep.201500151

    3. Oxley, Jimmie C.; Smith, James L.; Kagan, Gerald L.; Zhang, Guang; Swanson, Devon S. “Energetic Ma-terial /Polymer Interaction Studied by Atomic Force Microscopy.” Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotech-nics, January 2016, online. DOI: 10.1002/prep.201500161

    Pending- 1. Kevin Colizza, Keira E. Mahoney, Alexander V. Yevdokimov, James L. Smith and Jimmie C. Oxley. “Ace-

    tonitrile Ion Suppression in Atmospheric Pressure Ionization Mass Spectrometry.” Journal of the American Society of Mass Spectroscopy, in review.

    C. Peer Reviewed Conference Proceedings

    1. Swanson, D. (Abstract only) “Noncontact Electrostatic Swabbing of Energetic Materials.” Trace Ex-plosives Detection Workshop, Charlottesville, VA, April 4-8, 2016.

    2. Swanson, D. (Abstract only) “The Role of Thermal Analysis in Screening and Analyzing Cocrystalli-zation of Energetic Materials.” North American Thermal Analysis Society International Conference, Orlando, FL, August 15-19, 2016.

    3. McLennan, L. (Abstract only) “Raman for Tracking Thermal Effects in Energetic Materials.” North American Thermal Analysis Society International Conference, Orlando, FL, August 15-19, 2016.

    4. Levine, R. (Abstract only) “Creation of Pyrotechnic Foams.” North American Thermal Analysis Society International Conference, Orlando, FL, August 15-19, 2016.

    5. Oxley, J. “Ion Suppression by Solvent in LC-MS.” New Trends in Research Energetic Materials, Pardu-bice, CZ, April 21, 2016.

    6. Oxley, J. “Hexamethylene triperoxide diamine (HMTD).” Trace Explosive Detection Workshop, Char-lottesville, VA, April 4-8, 2016.

    7. Oxley, J. “Issues in Explosive Detection: Sampling” SciX- The Great Scienti ic Exchange, Providence, RI, September 18, 2015.

    8. Oxley, J. “Peroxides and other HME”, HME Working Group, Washington DC, September 4, 2015.

    D. Other Presentations

    1. Seminars—See Section IV.A for education, invited talks, and presentations2. Poster Sessions—

    a. For ALERT events & TEDb. Graduate student Austin Brown was selected to give a poster titled, In support of Explosive De-

    ALERT Phase 2 Year 3 Annual Report

    Appendix A: Project Reports Thrust R1: Characterization & Elimination of Illicit Explosives

    Project R1-A.1

  • tection at the Trace Explosive Detection conference for his work on explosive simulants for CT (April 2016, Charlottesville).

    3. Webinars—Safety webinar for ALERT April 1, 20164. Short Courses—Listed under Section IV (Education and Training to Professionals and Others)5. Interviews and /or News Articles

    a. (2016, February 19). Univ. of Rhode Island Develops Sensor to Detect Explosives. WBZ-TV/CBS Boston. Retrieved from http://boston.cbslocal.com/2016/02/23/univ-of-rhode-island-devel-ops-sensor-to-detect-explosives/

    b. Callimachi, R. (2016, March 22). A Blurry Photo Hints at ISIS Tradecraft. New York Times. Re-trieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/23/world/europe/brussels-suspects-photo.html

    c. Reynolds, M. (2016, March 22). URI Researcher: Bombs’ Chemistry is Key to Brussels Attack Investigation. The Providence Journal. Retrieved from http://www.providencejournal.com/arti-cle/20160322/NEWS/160329762

    d. Towne, S. Reported by Woods, R. (2016, March 23). URI Researchers Hope to Deter Use of Home-made Bombs. WPRI EYEwitness News. Retrieved from http://wpri.com/2016/03/23/uri-re-searchers-hope-to-deter-use-of-homemade-bombs/

    e. Begin, J. (2016, March 23). Le même explosif qu’à Paris? La Presse. Retrieved from http://www.lapresse.ca/international/dossiers/attentats-a-bruxelles/201603/22/01-4963616-le-meme-explosif-qua-paris.php

    f. Turco, R. (2016, March 23). URI Export: Bombs’ chemistry can help investigators of Brus-sels attacks. ABC 6 News. Retrieved from http://www.abc6.com/story/31550931/uri-ex-pert-bombs-chemistry-can-help-investigators-of-brussels-attacks

    g. Freedman, A. (2016, March 23). Lethal ingredient ISIS uses in bombs is easy to get and hard to track. Mashable. Retrieved from http://mashable.com/2016/03/23/isis-bomb-ingredi-ent/#7DczyuAd1Zqh

    h. Lamfalussy, C. (2016, March 23). Il a fallu “plusieurs semaines” pour fabriquer les bombes de Bruxelles. La Libre. Retrieved from http://www.lalibre.be/actu/belgique/il-a-fallu-plusieurs-semaines-pour-fabriquer-les-bombes-de-bruxelles-56f2f40b35708ea2d3d94bf3

    i. Bagni, A. (2016, March 23). Local experts not surprised by Belgium attack, bomb materials. Turn-To10 Channel 10 News. Retrieved from http://turnto10.com/news/local/local-experts-not-sur-prised-by-belgium-attack-bomb-materials

    j. (March 23, 2016). Counterterrorism Experts Call for More Security Around Airports in Wake of Attacks. Inside Edition. http://www.insideedition.com/headlines/15431-counterterrorism-ex-perts-call-for-more-security-around-airports-in-wake-of-attacks

    k. McDermott, J. (March 23, 2016). Explosive linked to Europe attacks easy to make, detonate. The Associated Press. Retrieved from http://gen2.synacor.net/news/read/category/US/article/the_associated_press-explosive_linked_to_europe_attacks_easy_to_make_de-ap

    l. Tremonti, A (host). (2016, March 24). The Current Transcript for March 24, 2016. CBC Radio. Re-trieved from http://www.cbc.ca/radio/thecurrent/the-current-for-march-24-2016-1.3505338/mar-24-2016-episode-transcript-1.3506845

    m. Russel, A. (2016, March 25). TATP or ‘Mother of Satan’: the homemade explosive used by ISIS. Global News. Retrieved from http://globalnews.ca/news/2600801/tatp-or-mother-of-satan-

    ALERT Phase 2 Year 3 Annual Report

    Appendix A: Project Reports Thrust R1: Characterization & Elimination of Illicit Explosives

    Project R1-A.1

  • the-homemade-explosive-used-by-isis/n. (March 29, 2016). An Hour with Bob [Television Broadcast]. Retrieved from https://www.you-

    tube.com/watch?v=h-2q84ZXEtgo. Jacoby, M. (2016, March 29). Explosive used in Brussels isn’t hard to detect. Chemical & Engi-

    neering News. Retrieved from http://cen.acs.org/articles/94/web/2016/03/Explosive-used-Brussels-isnt-hard.html

    E. New and Existing Courses Developed and Student Enrollment

    New or Existing

    Course/Module/Degree/Cert. Title Description

    Student Enrollment

    New Certifi cate Fundamentals for Opera-tors

    Fundamentals off ered for the non-college graduate

    17

    New Certifi cate Advanced Hazards Recog-nition

    Basic chemistry of explosives, HME, hands-on components

    12

    Existing Certifi cate Materials Characterization Eff ect of measurement & eff ect of physical properties

    17

    Existing Certifi cate Stability, Compatibility Safe handling, compatibility, contractors’ safety manual

    17

    Existing Certifi cate Detonation & DDT Detonation & DDT 18

    Existing Certifi cate Warheads Mechanics Warheads issues in designs 18

    Existing Certifi cate Fundamentals of Explo-sives

    Basics of chemistry, shock, det-onation, HME, devices

    24

    Existing Certifi cate Fundamentals of Explo-sives

    Basic chemistry, shock, deto-nation, HME, detection

    50

    Existin g Certifi cate Air Blast Calculations of structure and human response to blast

    36

    Revised Certifi cate Explosives Analysis Heavily revised to accommo-date large groups in hands-on laboratory

    21

    F. Technology Transfer/Patents

    1. Inventions Discloseda. Patent Applications Filed (Including Provisional Patents) Jimmie Oxley; James Smith; Jonathan

    Canino. “Non-Detonable Explosive or Explosive-Simulant Source” is in the process of being con-verted from provisional to full patent.

    G. Requests for Assistance/Advice

    1. From DHSa. On call for a variety of TSA TSS-E personnelb. Oxley is part of the DHS-formed Inter-Agency Explosive Terrorism Risk Assessment Working

    Group (IExTRAWG). In addition to group meetings, a representative was sent to URI for 2 days in August so that we could inalize the metric for selecting threat materials.

    c. Commissioner of U.S. Customs & Border Protection and former Director of the Of ice of National

    Table 1: Courses off ered in Year 3

    ALERT Phase 2 Year 3 Annual Report

    Appendix A: Project Reports Thrust R1: Characterization & Elimination of Illicit Explosives

    Project R1-A.1

  • Drug Control Policy, R. Gil Kerlikowske, came to visit on April 13, 2016. He has asked individuals from the CBPs National Targeting Center to follow up with further conversations.

    2. From Federal/State/Local Governmenta. The Massachusetts State Bomb Squad and Hazmat (JHAT) team spent May 12, 2016 in our labs

    for a short course on Advanced Hazards Recognition.

    V. REFERENCES

    [1] Oxley, J.C.; Smith, J.L.; Brady, J.; Steinkamp, F.L. “Factors Infl uencing Destruction of Triace-tone Triperoxide (TATP),” Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics, 2014, 39(2), 289-298., 10.1002/prep.201300063

    [2] Oxley, J.C.; Smith, J.L.; Canino, J.N. “Insensitive TATP Training Aid by Microencapsulation” J. En-ergetic Materials; 2015, 33(3), 215-228.

    [3] Oxley, J.C.; Smith, J.L.; Steinkamp, L.; Zhang, G. “Factors Infl uencing Triacetone Triperoxide (TATP) and Diacetone Diperoxide (DADP) Formation: Part 2,” Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotech-nics, 2013, 6, 841-51

    [4] Oxley, J.C.; Smith, J.L.; Bowden, P.; Ryan Rettinger “Factors Infl uencing TATP and DADP Forma-tion: Part I” Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics 2013, 38(2), 244-254.

    [5] Brady, J.E.; Oxley, J.C.; Smith, J.L.; Hart, C.E. Estimating Ambient Vapor Pressure of Low Vola-tility Explosives by Rising-Temperature Thermogravitmetry; Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics 2012 37(2), 215-222.

    [6] Oxley, Jimmie C.; Brady, Joseph; Wilson, Steven A.; Smith, James L. “The risk of mixing dilute hy-drogen peroxide and acetone solutions,” J Chemical Health & Safety 2012 19(2), 27-33.

    [7] Fan, W, Young, M, Canino, J, Smith, J, Oxley, J, Almirall, JR “Fast Detection of Triacetone Triperox-ide (TATP) from Headspace using Planar Solid Phase Microextraction (PSPME) Coupled to an IMS Detector” Anal Bioanal Chem. 2012 403(2), 401-408.

    [8] Oxley, J.C.; Smith, J.L.; Kirschenbaum, L.; Marimiganti, S.; Efremenko, I.; Zach, R; Zeiri,Y Accu-mulation of Explosive in Hair: Part 3: Binding Site Study; J Forensic Sci 2012 57(3), 623-35.

    [9] Dubnikova, Faina; Kosloff, Ronnie; Oxley, Jimmie C.; Smith, James L.; Zeiri, Yehuda “Role of Metal Ions in the Destruction of TATP: Theoretical Considerations” J Phys Chem A 2011 115(38), 10565-10575.

    [10] Oxley, J.C., Smith, J.L.; Huang, J.; Luo, W. “Destruction of Peroxide Explosives,” J. Forensic Sci., 2009 54(5), 1029-33.

    [11] Oxley, J.C.; Smith, J.L.; Bowden, P.; R. Rettinger “Factors Infl uencing TATP and DADP Formation: Part I” Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics 2013, 38(2), 244-254.

    [12] Oxley, J.C.; Smith, J.L.; Brady, J.; Steinkamp, F.L. “Factors Infl uencing Destruction of Triacetone Triperoxide (TATP),” Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics, 2014,39(2), 289-298.

    [13] Oxley, J.C.; Smith, J.L.; Brady, IV, J.E.; Brown, A.C. Characterization and Analysis of Tetranitrate Esters, Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics, 2012, 37(1), 24-39.

    [14] Oxley, J.; Smith, J.; Donnelly, M.; Porter, M. “Fuel-Oxidizer Mixtures: Their Stabilities and Burn Characteristics; International Journal of Energetic Materials and Chemical Propulsion 2014, 13(6): 517-558.10.1007/s10973-015-4589-x (J Therm Anal Calorim)

    [15] Colizza, Kevin M Porter, J. Smith, J. Oxley “Gas Phase Reactions of Alcohols with Hexamethylene triperoxide diamine (HMTD) under Atmospheric Pressure Chemical Ionization Conditions” Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry 2014, 29(1), 74, 10.1002/rcm.7084.

    ALERT Phase 2 Year 3 Annual Report

    Appendix A: Project Reports Thrust R1: Characterization & Elimination of Illicit Explosives

    Project R1-A.1

  • [16] Oxley, J.; Smith, J.; Porter, M.; Colizza, K.; McLennan, L.; Zeiri, Y; Kosloff, R.; Dubnikova, F “Mechanisms of Synthesis and Degradation of Hexamethylene triperoxide diamine (HMTD)” Pro-pellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics 2016, 41(2), 334-350.

    [17] Lock, C.M.; Brust, H.; van Breukelen, M.; Dalmolen, J.; Koeberg, M.; Stoker, D.A. “Investigation of Isotopic Linkages between Precursor Materials and the Improvised High Explosive Product Hexam-ethylene Triperoxide Diamine” Analytical Chem. 2012, 84, 4984-92.

    [18] Satterfi eld, C.N.; Case, L.C. “Reaction of Aldehyde and hydrogen peroxide in Aqueous Solution” Ind. And Eng. Chem. 1954, 46 (5), 998-1001. Satterfi eld, C.N.; Wilson, R.E.; LeClair, R.M.; Reid, R.C. “Analysis of Aqueous Mixtures of Hydrogen Peroxide and Aldehydes” Anal Chem. 1954, 26 (11), 1792-1797.

    [19] Edward, J.T.; Chubb, F. L.; Gilson, D.F.R.; Hynes, R.C.; Sauriol, F.; Wiesenthal, A. “Cage Peroxides have Planar Bridgehead Nitrogen Atoms” Can. J. Chem. 1999, 77(5/6) 1057-1065.

    [20] Mendum, T. Trace Explosive Detection Conference; Pittsburgh April 2015. Aernecke, M. J.; Men-dum, T.; Geurtsen, G.; Ostrinskaya, A.; Kunz, R. R. J. Phys. Chem. A 2015, 119, 11514–11522.

    [21] Colizza, K.; Porter, M.; Smith, J.L.; Oxley, J.C. “Gas Phase Reactions of alcohols with hexamethy-lene triperoxide diamine (HMTD) under atmospheric pressure chemical ionization conditions” Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2015, 29, 74-80.

    [22] Oxley, J.C.; Smith, J.L.; Chen, H.; Cioffi , E. “Decomposition of Multi-Peroxidic Compounds: Part II: Hexamethylene Triperoxide Diamine (HMTD)” Thermochemica Acta 2002, 388(1-2), 215-225.

    [23] Oxley, J.; Zhang, J.; Smith, J., Cioffi , E. “Mass Spectra of Unlabeled and Isotopically Labeled Hexam-ethylene Triperoxide Diamine (HMTD)” Propellants, Explosives and Pyrotechnics, 2000, 25, 1-4

    [24] Oxley, J.C.; Smith, J.L.; Lou, L.; Brady, J. “Determining Vapor Pressures of Diacetone Diperoxide (DADP) and Hexamethylene Triperoxide Diamine (HMTD)” Propel Explos. Pyrotech. 2009, 34, 539-43

    [25] Taylor, C.A.; Rinkenbach, W. H.M.T.D. A New Detonating Explosive” Army Ordnance; J Army Ord-nance Assoc. 1924, 5, 436-66. Taylor, C.A; Rinkenbach,W. Sensitivities of Detonating Compounds to Frictional Impact, Impact, and Heat. J Franklin Institute., 1927, 204, 369-76.

    ALERT Phase 2 Year 3 Annual Report

    Appendix A: Project Reports Thrust R1: Characterization & Elimination of Illicit Explosives

    Project R1-A.1

  • This page intentionally left blank.