r skiff healthcare synopsis
DESCRIPTION
Brief Synopsis of some of my Healthcare ProjectsTRANSCRIPT
Richard Skiff – Synopses of Healthcare Projects
SYNOPSES OF SELECTED
PROJECTS IN HEALTHCARE
HEALTHCARE
Richard Skiff – Synopses of Healthcare Projects
STEPS TO IMPROVEMENT
• Acknowledge that there are problems
• Understand the cause(s) of the problem
• Solve the problem
• Sustain the solutionThe real challenge!
Harder
Hard
Easy
Richard Skiff – Synopses of Healthcare Projects
WHO IS THE CUSTOMER?
The customer is anyone whose evaluation of your services has an impact on your ability to continue to
deliver those services.
Richard Skiff – Synopses of Healthcare Projects
WHAT IS A PROBLEM?
A Problem (or opportunity)
is Something
that is Different than what it
Should Be.
Richard Skiff – Synopses of Healthcare Projects
ED PROBLEM
AVERAGE LENGTH OF
STAY
EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT IMPROVEMENT
5© 2013
Richard Skiff – Synopses of Healthcare Projects
6
Background Information
• Southeastern US Hospital• 81 Bed Emergency Department
– 26 Bed Major Unit (ESI levels 1-2)– 32 Bed Minor Unit(s) (ESI levels 3-5)– 12 Bed Major/Minor Transition– 10 Bed Behavioral Health Unit– 1 SANE room.
• 100,000 visits per year
Richard Skiff – Synopsis of Healthcare Projects
Door to provider Average LOS
Overall Quality of Care % Excellent
Door to Provider vs. LWBS
30
60
90
Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Average Door to Provider
Better
Average Length of Stay
120
180
240
300
360
Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Min
ute
s
Average Length of Stay
Better
Overall Quality % Exc
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
% E
xcel
len
t
Overall Quality % Exc
Better
LWBS
0.0%
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
4.0%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
LWBS
Better
LWBS
Improve Key ED Metrics
Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Richard Skiff – Synopsis of Healthcare Projects
59Holding
54 Green
Waiting
Room
50
49 48
51
47
Suture
46
Suture
EMS
Office
44 43
3534
42
39 Eyes
30 32 33
36
45
Suture
41
40
37
38
31
2928
58
57
56
55
53 52
Nurse
Station
RR
Radiology
Provider
Area RR
Pyxis Nurse’s
Station
Supply
Prep
and
Pyxis
RR
RR Soiled LinenTriage and Lab
PA
Discharge
“Green” Zone
3 Rooms
11 am to 11 pm
1 PA, 2 RN,
1 Tech, 1 MUS
“Yellow Intake”
3 Rooms
3 pm to 11 pm
1 MD, 2 RN, 1 Tech
“Yellow Zone”
24 Rooms
Open 24 hours
Staffing Varies Throughout Day
Phase 1: Minor Treatment Zones
Richard Skiff – Synopses of Healthcare Projects
FMC ED: Intake Average Length of Stay (ALOS)
60
90
120
150
180
210
240
270
300
Oct-08
Nov-08
Dec-08
Jan-
09
Feb-0
9
Mar
-09
Apr-0
9
May
-09
Jun-
09
Jul-0
9
Aug-0
9
Sep-0
9
Oct-09
Nov-09
Dec-09
Jan-
10
Feb-1
0
Mar
-10
Apr-1
0
May
-10
Jun-
10
Jul-1
0
Inta
ke
AL
OS
(m
in)
Baseline: Mean = 240 min
Trial: Mean = 155 min
Intake Implemented: Mean = 170 min
Savings of 70 minutes per
patient
Savings of 70 minutes per patient by going through Intake Process vs.
Yellow Zone
Expand the demonstrated effectiveness of Phase I
Richard Skiff – Synopsis of Healthcare Projects
59
54 Green
Waiting
Room
50
49 48
51
47
Suture
46
Suture
EMS
Office
44 43
3534
42
39 Eyes
30 32 33
36
45
Suture
41
40
37
38
31
2928
58
57
56
55
53 52
Phase 2
Nurse
Station
RR
Radiology
Provider
Area RR
Pyxis PACS,
Secretary
Supply
Prep
and
Pyxis
RR
RR Soiled LinenTriage and Lab
PA
Team Intake 2
4 Rooms
3 pm to 11 pm
“Yellow Zone”
15 Rooms
Open 24 hours
Staffing Varies Throughout Day
Close 1 assignment to reallocate
staff for expanded
Team Intake
Team Intake 1
4 Rooms
11 am to 11 pm
“Supertrack”
3 Rooms; 1 pm to 10 pm
Richard Skiff – Synopses of Healthcare Projects
11
Phase 2 Improvements
• By focusing a provider (PA or MD), 2 Nurses, and a tech to a “pod” (a set of treatment rooms in close proximity), we found a significant improvement in the ability to focus on patients and patient flow, and therefore reducing the “Average Length of Stay” and “Left Without Being Seen” rates.
• We incrementally expanded this concept throughout the minor treatment zone, making adjustments as needed in each phase.
• The success was so significant that this process was expanded to include the entire minor treatment zone.
Richard Skiff – Synopsis of Healthcare Projects
59
54 Green
Waiting
Room
50
49 48
51
47
Suture
46
Suture
EMS
Office
44
OB?
43
3534
42
39 Eyes
30 32 33
36 D/C; Flex
45
Suture
41
40
37 D/C; Flex
38 D/C; Flex
31
2928
58
57
56
55
53 52
Nurse
Station
RR
Radiology
Provider
Area RR
PyxisPACS,
MUS (2)
Supply
Prep
and
Pyxis
RR
RR Soiled LinenTriage and Lab
PA
Intake Holding: Open 24/7 Pod A Open 1:00 pm to 6:00 am Pod B Open 9:00 am to 11:00 pm
Pod C Open 11:00 am to 11:00 pm
Pod D Open 24/7
There is a “Float” PA from 3:00 pm to 8:00 pm
1 pm – 10 pm PA
10 pm – 6 am PA
9 am – 5 pm PA
3 pm – 11 pm PA2 hr overlap 3 pm to 5 pm
11 am – 3 pm PA
3 pm – 11 pm MD
Flex Room
Flex Room Flex
Room
Shared by all pods
Flex Room
Shared by all pods
No more Supertrack – incorporated into intake pods
Main Lobby / Waiting Room
7 am – 4 pm PA
4 pm – 12 am PA
11 pm – 7 am PA1 hr overlap 11pm to 12 am
Phase 3
Richard Skiff – Synopses of Healthcare Projects
Pre-Implementation Simulation
• Patient data from a high volume day was analyzed to “simulate” running all of the Minor Zone as an Intake Process:
– Total ED Patients 315– Minor Zone Patients 209– BH Patients Arriving 23
• Note: No patient treatment times were shortened. Efficiencies were gained in through improving patient flow. Patient names are fictitious.
Richard Skiff – Synopses of Healthcare Projects
Simulation Results – Minor Zone
Actual Simulation Savings
Average Length of Stay(BH Patients
included)
373 min 326 min 46 min
Average Length of Stay (BH Patients excluded)
241 min 190 min 51 min
Average Arrival to Room 91 min 49 min 42 min
Average Time in Treatment Room
N/A 52 min
Maximum # of Patients in Main Lobby Waiting Room
About 24 14
Left Without Being Seen 9 patients 5 patients (estimated)
Richard Skiff – Synopsis of Healthcare ProjectsMain Waiting Room
59
54 Green
Waiting
Room
50
49 48
51
47
46
EMS
44 43
3534
42
39 Eyes
30 32 33
36
45
41
40
37
38
31
2928
58
57
56
55
53 52
Nurse
Station
RR
Radiology
Provider
Area RR
Pyxis PACS,
Secretary
Supply
Prep
and
Pyxis
RR
RR Soiled LinenTriage and Lab
Kyles 26
Bennett 36
Lester
Lamar 21
Jennings 98
Bell 39
Kirksey 28
Beck 47 Buford
Bass 104
Blake 28
Baker 119
Bean 69
Jones 62
Beeson 41
Boyd
Burns
CLOSED
Helms
Weathers
Green
WatsonSi
nks
Dan
iels
Spin
ks
Ala
bast
er
Arc
hiba
ld
Dill
ard
Pete
rs
Min
ton
Hendrick Jefferson
HarrisAndrade Gillespie
Gen
try
Fox
Stewart
Sum
mer
s
Alle
n
Ston
e
Gri
er
Jess
upPurvis
Bullins
Wall
Boyd
Brewer
Nelson
Calloway
Baxter 16:00
King 29
At 16:00, 18 patients in Waiting Room with average wait time of 58 minutes to that
point
Billings 32 Johnson 84 Bergman 36 Brady
DISCHARGE
Actual Current Process
Hob
son
138
From Triage
PA
Richard Skiff – Synopses of Healthcare Projects
Main Waiting Room
59
54 Green
Waiting
Room
50
49 48
51
47
Suture
46
Suture
EMS
44
OB?
43
3534
42
39 Eyes
30 32 33
36
45
Suture
41
40
37
38
31
2928
58
57
56
55
53 52
Min
ton
Gre
en
Stone
Bro
dy
Allen
Daniels
Watson
Beane
Jenn
ings
Spin
ks
Gill
espi
e
Bass
Archibald
Hob
son
John
son
Wea
ther
sB
eck
King 29
Nurse
Station
RR
Radiology
Provider
Area RR
Pyxis PACS,
Secretary
Supply
Prep
and
Pyxis
RR
RR Soiled LinenTriage and Lab
PA
Intake Holding
Lam
ar 2
1
Fox
Bee
son
41
Bill
ings
32
Kyl
es 2
6
Ben
nett
36
Ber
gman
36
Bla
ke 2
8
Kir
ksey
28
Jess
up
Jone
s
Bax
ter
Bell
Ala
bast
er
HelmsB
aker
Summers
Stewart
Bow
ers
16:0016:0116:0216:0316:0416:0516:0616:0716:0816:0916:1016:1116:1216:1316:1416:1516:1616:1716:1816:1916:2016:2116:2216:2316:2416:2516:2616:2716:2816:2916:30
At 16:00, 9 patients in Waiting Room with average wait time of 31 minutes to that
point
Simulated New Process
Hendrick BH Jefferson BH
Harris BH
From Triage DISCHARGE
Richard Skiff – Synopses of Healthcare Projects
HOSPITAL PROBLEM:
NURSING STAFF TIME WASTED
DOING “HUNTING AND
GATHERING”
NURSE EFFECTIVNESS
17© 2013
Richard Skiff – Synopses of Healthcare Projects
18
What is “Hunting and Gathering?”
Anytime a member of the Nursing Staff has to go someplace other than his/her immediate area to get something to provide care to the patient.
– Physical hunting and gathering of equipment, supplies, and equipment.
– Waiting for information/people/resources that are not where they are needed when they are needed.
*In this study, only Nurse hunting and gathering was measured. Hunting and Gathering should also include all other care givers, including Providers and CNAs.
Richard Skiff – Synopsis of Healthcare Projects
19
Current State
TCAB Overall ScopeC
onte
xt D
iagr
am
Admit Patient to
Unit
Implement Care and Treatment
Complete Patient
Discharge
Patient Enters
Patient Departs
Care Planning
Med Administration
Hunting and Gathering is present in all aspects of Nursing Care.
Admission/Discharge
Med AdministrationCare PlanningHunting and Gathering
Complete Health History
Evaluate Patient
Response
Patient Assessment
Itterative Cycle
Scope of Hunting and Gathering
Richard Skiff – Synopsis of Healthcare Projects
Time Spent Hunting and Gathering
20
Minutes per 12 hr. Nursing Shift Spent.....
Hunting and Gathering
25%; 3 hr 1 min
See Separate Chart
Bothpaper and computer charting19%; 2 hr 14 min
Med scanning from cart 9%; 1 hr
Shift/Nurse reporting
6%; 44 min
General nursing duties in patient's room and
administration of meds
35%; 4 hr 10 min
Misc7%; 51
min
Hunting and Gathering is about 25% of a Nurse’s day
These are only relatively small
snapshots of time, and results are
for high level/directional
use only
Richard Skiff – Synopsis of Healthcare Projects
What are they spending time hunting?
21
Percent of Total Nurse time spent Hunting and Gathering for………..
Equipment 5.4%
Supplies 3.8%
Wait for Equip/Pyxis
2.6%
Info 1.1%
Get Meds from Pyxis 8%
Med not
in 1st Pyxis
1.5%
Patient Amenity
2.4%
Hunting and Gathering is 25% of
total RN time
Richard Skiff – Synopsis of Healthcare Projects
22
Methods and Procedures
Provide own d/c transport GG
Transport ancillary (Radiology, Dialysis, Transfers) GGWasted med witness GG
Insulin Witness GG
Documentation GG
Duplicate Forms GG
Floor Stock Electronic Equipment (Dynamaps, Pulse Ox, etc.) GG
Floor Stock Non-Electronic Equipment (Wheelchairs, Recliners, walkers, etc..) GG
Equipment Failures – look for working equip GG, W
Take home equipment
Discharge orders WPyxis Discrepancy
Charts GG
Med info from pt. for pharmacy GG
Providers GG
Co-workers GG
Home meds GG
Policies GG
Radiology Results GG
Supplies &
Amenities
Respiratory Therapy Supplies GG
Search Multiple Pyxis GG
Linens GG
Nourishment GG
Coffee, Snacks, Personal Care items GG
Dressings GG
Load Med Cart GG
Stock Outs GG
Medications
IV Fluids GG
Checking for missing meds to be delivered from pharmacy GG
Insulin GG
Home Meds GG
Non stocked Narcotics GG, W
Blood GG
Ancillary Services
Lab W
Focus Area
X-Ray W
E.V.S. – Housekeeping W
Food Trays W
HUNTING AND GATHERINGGG = Go Get
W = Waiting
“Fishbone” diagram for reasons why nurses spent time
hunting and gathering
InformationEquipment
Richard Skiff – Synopsis of Healthcare Projects
…..Floor Stock Electronic Equipment? (Dynamaps, PulsOx, Scanners, Med Carts, Phones, Bladder Scanners)
Hunting and Gathering: Why do we hunt for……W
hy?
Specific Task Item
Why
?W
hy?
Why
?W
hy?
Why
?
Not Returned to
Proper Location
Left in room
In Use by
another
No designated
place for equipment
Improper use
Hoarded
Called to another
task
Frequent use by
this patient
No time to return
to location
No Time to charge
Multiple storage places
Equipment shared by
multiple units
Not enough storage places
Past normal
life
No PM Program
Overuse
No replacement
plan
Not Charged
(Dead Battery
Bad cords
No Preventative Maintenance
No place to plug in
Not enough for each unit
Plan to use for
next Patient
Broken
Off unit (Borrowed or appropriated
)
Too far to walk
to return
Unknown charge
time
No charging schedule
Not plugged
in
See A
ANeeded for use
No Accountability
Lack of training
5 Why Analysis
23
Took focus areas noted in the fishbone diagram, and generated a “5 Why”
analysis to address issues.
Richard Skiff – Synopsis of Healthcare Projects
24
…...Floor Stock Electronic Equipment? (Dynamaps, PulsOx, Scanners, Med Carts, Phones, Bladder Scanners)
Hunting and Gathering: Why do we hunt for……W
hy?
Why
?W
hy?
Why
?W
hy?
Why
?
Unfixable and not
communicated
Gave back to wrong
unit
Sent to Engineering
and not returned
Waiting for Repair
Never sent for repair
Not enough equipment
Floor Stock Electronic Equipment (Dynamaps, PulsOx, Scanners, Med Carts, Phones, Bladder Scanners)
Staff doesn’t
enter the request
No clear method for
engineering to communicate
back to the unit the status
No way to track
No defined return path
Waiting on parts
Don’t know how
Process too cumbersome
No replacement process – not
communicate to person that can
order
No Process or Bad
Process
Borrowed and not returned
Another unit
doesn’t have the
equip they need
No or poor
tracking system
Ineffective sign out system
No defined labeling system that is
permanent
Equipment poorly
labled so not
returned
Hoarding
No easy access to equipment
Ability to order equip
is too compli-cated
Not enough
ordered or purchased
Financial Constraints
Don’t know how many we have
When comes in
not delivered
to unit
No inventory guideline
Takes a long time to come
after ordered
Don’t have ownership
and a process
Specific Task Item
Richard Skiff – Synopsis of Healthcare Projects
…...Non-Electronic Floor Stock? (Carts, Wheelchairs, Walkers, IV Poles, Bedside Commodes, Recliners, etc.)
Hunting and Gathering: Why do we hunt for…… W
hy?
Wh
y?W
hy?
Wh
y?W
hy?
Wh
y?
People left equipment in other area (i.e.
discharge)
Not enough equipment
No ownership
In a hurry
Went someplace else and when
came back equipment was
gone
No Accountability
Removed from room
In use with another patient
When Unit closed and equipment removed and
taken elsewhere
EVS does Discharge clean and removes
equipment
Borrowed for another
patient
Variable process and equipment needs for each
unit
Inventory issue
Broken
Missing parts
Thrown away
No Security or ability to lock unit.
Specific Task Item
25
Richard Skiff – Synopsis of Healthcare Projects
HOSPITAL PROBLEM
New Hospital Opening – Are
We Ready?
NURSE EFFECTIVNESS
26© 2013
Richard Skiff – Synopses of Healthcare Projects
NEW HOSPITAL OPENING
• A new system 60 bed hospital was slated to open in approximately 70 days.
• Worked with start-up team to determine process needs/gaps prior to hospital opening.
Richard Skiff – Synopsis of Healthcare Projects
Emergency
Direct Admit
Procedures (In /Out Patient)
Walk-ins
Regional PhysicianOffices
Discharge into
Community
INPUTS VALUE STREAMS OUTPUTS
Three Main Hospital Value Streams
Richard Skiff – Synopsis of Healthcare Projects
High Level Value Streams
Richard Skiff – Synopsis of Healthcare Projects
From MD OfficesFrom EmergencyFrom Inpatient
Pre Arrival Information
Registration Pre Cert, etc
Patient Info
NameDOBDemographicsInsurance
Clinical Information
Procedure/InfusionLength of ProcedureAllergiesSpecial NeedsOrder for ConsentRegular Orders
Pre-Anesthesia VisitMedical History and PhysicalPre-op Teaching/instructions If face to face; RN will notify pt.
Provider InformationSurgeon/MD; Does Patient need a PAV?
Schedule Patient
Enter into PICIS
Patient Arrival Arrival at Front Desk
Escort to Surgical Services
Greeter entry into Smartrak
Escort to ACU
Update Smartrak
Patient Arrival
Developed Key Quality Characteristics for each value stream.
Each stream had three main steps:
• Patient Arrival
• Patient Treatment
• Patient Departure
Surgical Services Value Stream
Richard Skiff – Synopsis of Healthcare Projects
Perform Surgery
Pre-Op
Complete Assessment
Pre-Procedure verification
Outside Ancillary Tests Completed and Charted
Signed Consents
Site Marked
Prep Patient
Activate RDY button when Pt. is completely ready
Operating Room
RN go to ACU/Preop to meet/greeet patient
Transport Patient to OR
Update Smartrak - Circ RN
MD-Surgeon - Sign and mark
Anesthesia - Interview blocks
Perform Sugery
Upon Completion, Call ACU/PACU when close to transporting patient (RNA or RN)
How do Ancillary Services communicate / hand-off to Surgery?- Radiology- Pathology- Labs- Respiratory- Pharmacy- ICU- Wound
Patient Treatment
The key steps in each process were determined, and then processes needed to accomplish that task were identified.
Then they were evaluated for “readiness to open”
Green = Ready to Go
Yellow = Needs some refining
Red = Needs a lot of work
Richard Skiff – Synopsis of Healthcare Projects
PACUReceive Patient and Report from OR / ORNA
Patient Recovery
Update in Smartrak
Hand off to Next Level of Care
Bed Control
ACU
ICU
Med Surg
How do Ancillary Services communicate / hand-off to Surgery?- Radiology- Labs- Respiratory- Pharmacy- Wound Care
ACU
Patient Report from OR / CRNA / PACU
Patient Recovery
Food and Nutrition
Update in Smartrack
Discharge to Community
Communicate Discharge Reports and Instructions Provider/Nurse Ask Me Three Written and Verbal
Vital Signs
Referrals Insure Feedback and Follow-up
Movement of Patient
Exit Transportation
Meds/Prescriptions
Patient Departure
These “maps” were jointly developed and rated by the functional department, clinical personnel, administration, related ancillary services, etc.
From there, the functional areas were able to focus on “Gaps” prior to the opening of the hospital.
Richard Skiff – Synopses of Healthcare Projects
PROBLEM:
Uncertainty on the time
effectiveness of Ultrasound Technicians
ULTRASOUND TIME EFFECTIVENESS
33© 2013
Richard Skiff – Synopses of Healthcare Projects
34
TIME STUDY PROTOCOL
• Methodology:
Followed one sonographer for an entire shift, logging the time spent doing his/her normal tasks. Times shown are only for one sonographer, and do not reflect activities of others in the department at the time.
SHIFT # of Patients # of Exams
Day 8 10
Day 8 8
Evening 8 8
Evening 9 9
Richard Skiff – Synopsis of Healthcare Projects
Page 1
Radiology – Ultrasound “Scheduling” ProcessU
nit
Se
cre
tary
Order comes in via Printer
Put order in Future Basket
Is order for today?
Go to computer and print out Outpatient schedule
Near end of shift, fill out Day Log. Add to day
Log if already started.
Place patient requests and Day log into future basket
At beginning of day shift, pull requests from future basket
Is patient a Portable, ED, or Outpatient?
No
Attach blank “yellow sheet” (Hand off
communication tool) to every inpatient
request.
Call proper unit and ask for Patient’s RN; Fill out questions on
Yellow Sheet
No
Yes
Is patient in
ED ?Put request in ED Slot
Put request in Portable
Slot
Is Request for a Portable unit?
Put in 2nd slot in rack
When a Sonographer, room,
and machine are available, send for
patient
Transporter picks up request
Put front sheet in proper slot – to keep track of
what patients have been sent for
Is patient to come
to radiology unit?
Add order to Day Sheet
“A”
To AYes
No
Yes
Yes
Put request in Outpatient
slot
Is it an ED request?
Is the portable request Stat?
Place request in
“Ready Patient” slot
Put request in Portable Slot
Yes
No
Put request in ED Slot
No
Will procedure
need a labwork check?
Print off Labwork
sheet
Is labwork complete?
Call RN and order
labwork
Continue to check with RN until labwork is
complete
YesYes
No
Yes
No
No
No
To ED Process Page 2
To Outpatient Process Page 2
To “Portable” Process Page 2
To Outpatient Process Page 2
To B
“B”
Hospital Ultrasound Scheduling Process
Richard Skiff – Synopsis of Healthcare Projects
Page 2
Radiology – Ultrasound “Scheduling” Process
Out
patie
nt P
roce
ss“P
orta
bles
” P
roce
ssE
D P
roce
ss From ED Page 1
From “Outpatient”
Page 1
From “Portable”
Page 1
Wait for call from ED to say that
patient is ready for exam
Take paperwork from ED slot, write
“R” on the top of the sheet, and place it in
the first open “Ready Patient” slot
Next available Sonographer
retrieves paper, gets portable machine, and goes to ED
Sonographer performs exam
Are there more
exams in ED?Return to
departmentNo
Yes
US Supervisor pulls all “Portable” exam paperwork out of
“Portables” slot and place in “Ready
Patient” slot
Next available Sonographer
retrieves chart, gets portable machine,
and goes to Patient location
Sonographer performs exam
Return to department
Scheduled Outpatient
comes to US Department
US department processes
paperwork and puts in next “Ready
Patient” slot
Sonographer gets paperwork
and patient, takes to room
Sonographer performs exam or procedure
Put completed paperwork in
stack of completed exams
Unit secretary takes batches of
paperwork to Medical Records (once or twice a
month)
Ultrasound Scheduling Process (cont.)
Richard Skiff – Synopsis of Healthcare Projects
Sonographer Process
Son
ogra
pher
Check US “ready”
rack
Is there an ED
Exam ?
Go to ED Ultrasound
room
Is there “Portable”
Exam
Is there an “in department” exam
or procedure?
Get paperwork from printer
Check T-system for
room, relevant info
Get equipment
ready
Go to Pt Room
Perform exam
Is there another ED
Exam ?
Return to US Dept
Return to ED
US Room
Enter results of exam into computer
Yes
No
No
Yes
Do these first
Are there any
Transcranial exams?
Check Medical
records for previous exams
No
Yes
Perform exam
Go to Pt Room
Get equipment
ready
Is there another Exam
in batch?
Yes
Enter exam results into computer system
Did images transfer from
Portable?
Push images to computer
File paperwork
No
Yes
NoDoes
work-flow allow Portables
now?
Yes Yes
No
Check with supervisor for
priority
No
Return to US Dept
Go to charting computer,
begin charting process
Is patient here?
Send transport to get patient
Do Mandantory Education, Department
housekeeping, restocking, professional
development
Check Medical
records for previous exams
Grab chart
Check yellow sheet
for issues
Perform exam or
procedure
Yes Yes File paperwork
NoNo
A
To A
Go to charting computer,
begin charting process
Individual Sonographer Process
Richard Skiff – Synopsis of Healthcare Projects
Ultrasound Time Study: Combined Shifts
44.5%
10.7% 10.5%
8.1%6.3%
3.8% 3.0% 2.7% 2.5% 2.4% 2.3%1.0%
3.3%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
14:3
4:44
3:30
:45
3:25
:45
2:39
:46
2:03
:15
1:14
:00
0:58
:15
0:52
:30
0:49
:45
0:47
:00
0:44
:45
0:19
:30
1:05
:45
In room Dow ntime- No
Patients
ComputerCharting
Travel Lunch Misc prep Delay ScanBehind
Paperw ork MiscAdmin
Dow ntime
ChartReview
MiscDow ntime
Other
% o
f T
ime
Ultrasound Time Study: In Room Time - Combined Shifts
65.6%
9.9% 9.3%
5.1%3.6%
2.3% 2.0% 1.9%0.3%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
9:33
:45
1:27
:00
1:21
:15
0:44
:29
0:31
:30
0:20
:15
0:17
:45
0:16
:15
0:03
:58
Examination Post ExamClean-up
Pre-Exam Prep Room Prep Paperw ork Chart Check Computer Delay Delay Other
% o
f T
ime
Possible Opportunity
Found that the ultrasound department actually had a very high percent of
their time actively working with patients. Some improvements could be made at end of shift procedures
scheduling.
Time Study Results
Richard Skiff – Synopses of Healthcare Projects
Opportunity: Waiting for Patients
Why is a Sonographer Waiting for Patients?– Waiting for Transportation – Why?– End of a Shift - Why?– Waiting for Labs - Why?– No exam/procedure requests– Other
Richard Skiff – Synopses of Healthcare Projects
PROBLEM:
What are some of the issues
affecting Nuclear
Medicine?
NUCLEAR MEDICINE PROCESS STUDY
40© 2013
Richard Skiff – Synopses of Healthcare Projects
Nuclear Medicine Process Study
• Observed Nuclear Medicine and PET for four shifts, including nights and weekends.
• Collected responses from the “magic wand*” sheets, as well as from conversations with staff.
* Staff were asked the question: “If you could wave a magic wand and change three things in your area, what would they be?
Richard Skiff – Synopses of Healthcare Projects
Process Improvement
The Nuclear Medicine and PET Groups were continually making changes to improve their department. As one technologist said, “...every two or three weeks we’re trying something different to try to make things better.”
This is exactly what we need to encourage – people who actually do the work having input and making changes to improve the delivery of value to the customer.
Richard Skiff – Synopsis of Healthcare Projects
Nuclear Medicine: Breakdown of ProceduresJune 13 - December 9, 2010
Inpatient, 50.4%
Outpatient, 32.2%
Emergency, 17.4%
PET Procedures - Requesting "Unit"
Inpatient, 248, 16%
Outpatient, 1286, 84%
Who is Requesting Procedures?
Richard Skiff – Synopses of Healthcare Projects
Procedures Issues
• CCK and Lasix; RN vs. Technologist injections
• Outpatients with Ports, getting an RN in a timely manner
• Cardiolytes, getting a PA in a timely manner. One cardiology practice has recently cut PA positions – now have to wait for an MD to monitor.
Richard Skiff – Synopses of Healthcare Projects
Scheduling Ideas / Issues
• Mail appointment times and instructions to outpatients.
• STAT orders to NucMed on 2nd and 3rd shift – how to know that they are there.
• PET Procedure printing after 3:00 pm• Possible use of pagers in Waiting room – to
let patients know when to come back
Richard Skiff – Synopsis of Healthcare Projects
Location of Transports to/fromOther1.9%
Nuclear Med26.5%
PET12.3%
MRI35.0%
Rad/Onc24.3%
Over 60% of transports are done for other departments than NucMed
and PET
METHODOLOGY:
Compiled NucMed
Transporter Log
11/30/2010 – 12/10/2010
10 Days Total
Transporter Process Improvement
Richard Skiff – Synopses of Healthcare Projects
Individual Transporter Data
TransporterWorked Minutes
Total Trips
Average Trips per
Hour
Calculated Total
transporting Minutes
Calculated % of Time
Transporting
A 4599 100 1.3 2280 49.6%B 3720 81 1.3 1847 49.6%C 3600 61 1.0 1391 38.6%D 4230 83 1.2 1892 44.7%
Includes trips taken with another transporter
10 days X 8 Hrs, less PTO
Total Trips times 22.8 minutes per trip
The percent of time that a transporter was actively transporting ranged from 39 to 50 %
Richard Skiff – Synopsis of Healthcare Projects
TransporterWorked Minutes
Total Trips
Average Trips per
Hour
Calculated Total
transporting Minutes
Calculated % of Time
Transporting
A 4599 100 1.3 2280 49.6%B 3720 81 1.3 1847 49.6%C 3600 61 1.0 1391 38.6%D 4230 83 1.2 1892 44.7%
Includes trips taken with
another transporter
10 days X 8 Hrs, less PTO
Total Trips times 22.8 minutes per trip
The percent of time that a transporter was actively transporting ranged from 39 to 50 %
Richard Skiff – Synopses of Healthcare Projects
PROBLEM
Individual hospital process variation
affected system wide ED Stroke Response
times
SYSTEM WIDE ED STROKE IMPROVEMENT
49© 2013
Richard Skiff – Synopses of Healthcare Projects
ED Stroke Project Methodology
• Observed and process mapped main hospital and four satellite hospital ED stroke processes
• Process Mapped each Hospital’s processes, and Gathered ED stroke response data
• Brought all hospitals together to review process maps
• Determined best practices system wide to improve ED Stroke response, and began implementation of those practices
Richard Skiff – Synopsis of Healthcare Projects
Mean Median0
15
30
45
60
75
90
14.12
2
10.19
10
15.35
11
28.87
25
18.38
16
tPA Order to tPA Start
CT Read to tPA Order
CT Complete to CT Read
CT Order to CT Complete
Door to CT Order
Minutes
Main Hospital ED Code Stroke Data
Richard Skiff – Synopsis of Healthcare ProjectsMission System Wide ED Stroke Process: Current State Comparison
tPA Ordered
Patient Arrival
CT Scan CT Read
ME
MO
RIA
L
tPA Prepared
TransferProtocol
to Memorial
EMS Process
Patient Assess-
ment; CT
Ordered
AN
GE
LB
LUE
RID
GE
TR
AN
SY
LVA
NIA
McD
OW
ELL
EMS Assessment on Stretcher
MD Assess Pt. for Stroke in ED Room
Draw Blood if possible
Bring Telestroke Robot
Connect to Neurologist via Telestroke
RN Prepares tPAPlace patient
in room.
POV Assessment
??
“Clot Box” with Protocol and
Stroke supplies available
RN Standing orders allow for CT order
Lab samples taken
Bring Telestroke Robot
Connect to Neurologist via Telestroke
RN Prepares tPA
CT Scanners alert Radiology if > 20 min
w/o interpretation
Notify Dispatch with Name, DOB, and pt.
address
ED notifies MD, Radiology, and Lab.
Notify ED of inbound stroke
Dispatch contacts ED with preregistration
info and ETA
Register pt. at door if possible
POV: Notify CT and Lab; call Code
Stroke
Draw blood in room, if not
done yet
EKG, X-Ray if ordered by
MD
POV: Registration or Triage makes
first stroke assessment
POV: Registration or Triage makes
first stroke assessment; call
“Code Stroke”
EMS Arrival; put in ED
room
POV: Triage makes
first stroke assessment
ED notifies Radiology and
Lab
Notify ED, start IV
MD assess for stroke
Draw Blood
Quick Register Pt.
Connect to Neurologist via Telestroke when back in
room
tPA Ordered by Neurologist
RN Prepares tPA
RN administers
tPA
ED Alerts ED of incoming possible stroke, and ETA
Draws blood, if possible
Denotes Targeted Best Practice
Register pt. at door if possible
May also alert Telestroke
RN Standing orders allow for CT order
If clear “Rule In,” MD orders CT Scan and contacts MMH Neurology via phone for acceptance of transfer, without using
telestroke
If CT is busy, may do EKG
while patient is waiting for CT
If using Telestroke, bring robot to room. (sometimes while in CT, sometimes after back in
room.
Draw lab samples when back in ED room, if not
drawn before.
Decision to admit or transfer Pt to Memorial
RN Prepares tPA
RN administers
tPA
RN administers
tPA
RN administers
tPA
In house radiology available 8-5; after hours use Asheville Radiology. Consistently good
response times.
2 “boxes” of tPA ingredients kept in ED
Omnicell; 2 more in Pharmacy
POV: Registration or Triage recognizes stroke
symtoms
Assessment done at Triage or EMS stretcher
(Preferred) or in ED room
EMT assesses Pt.Start IV if possiblePerform CBG test
MAMA (only) can call Code Stroke
POV:PACE RN or Triage determines possible Stroke; either can call Code Stroke
EMS: Place patient in room Start NIH assessment Draw blood for lab Register Pt if not done before.
RN or Pharmacist Prepares tPA
Bedside
RN administers
tPA
2 CT Scans:Plain CT followed by an Angio CT with contrast
Begin moving Robot when Code Stroke is called, for all EDs except Memorial
tPA Given
STK-4 Criteria: Patients administered tPA within 60 minutes of presentation to ED (Patients admitted to hospital)
OP-23 Criteria: CT read within 45 minutes of presentation to ED: (Patients “discharged” from ED – i.e. transferred to another hospital)
Mai
n H
ospi
tal
Sate
llite
#1
Sate
llite
#2
Sate
llite
#3
Sate
lilte
#4
Richard Skiff – Synopses of Healthcare Projects
CHALLENGE
IMPROVE SUPPLY CHAIN
EFFECTIVENESS
HOSPITAL SUPPLY CHAIN
53© 2013
Richard Skiff – Synopses of Healthcare Projects
PROCESS APPROACH
• Value Stream Map of Materials Distribution• Process Map of Materials Ordering –
Transactional Processes• Process Map of Post Product Approval
Process
Richard Skiff – Synopsis of Healthcare Projects
SDC to SPD O.R. Case Cycle Time8:55 am to 3:56 pm (421 min) Processing Time: 262 min“Value Added” Time: 172 minProcessing Ratio: 62.2%Value Added Ratio: 40.9%
Print, separate and prioritize by expected delivery time and location.
Main Process: 7:00 am
Also prints every 30 minutes during the day
Unit calls, go to computer to look up
item
Cycle Time:
VA Time:
# of Units:
Yield:
Start Time:
End Time:
Distance:
Staff:1
Pull order
Cycle Time:
VA Time:
# of Units:
Yield:
Start Time:7:19am; 9:55 am
End Time:9:18am; 11:30 am
Distance:
Staff:
Place on cart or pallet to go to unit
Cycle Time:
VA Time:
# of Units:
Yield:
Start Time:
End Time:
Distance:
Staff:
Key in item – for inventory transfer
Process item
Cycle Time:
VA Time:
# of Units:
Yield:
Start Time:
End Time:
Distance:
Staff:
1) South Dock2) St Joseph3) Jasmine
ASC Delivered on 6:30 am truck
Also have van run at 12:30 for other locations, and throughout day for urgent items
Truck Delivers to Dock
Cycle Time: avg 25 min
VA Time:
# of Units:
Yield:
Start Time:
End Time:
Distance:
Staff:
3 Trucks each scheduled throughout the day:6:30 am8:30 am10:30 am12:30 pm2:30 pm
Load onto Truck
Cycle Time: 12 min
VA Time:
# of Units:
Yield:
Start Time:10:30 am
End Time: 10:42 am
Distance:
Staff:
Travel to first unit
Cycle Time: 6 min; 7 min
VA Time:
# of Units:
Yield:
Start Time:8:55am; 10:49 am
End Time: 9:01 am; 10:55 am
Distance:
Staff:
Come to docks to get the materials for their assigned zones.
Sort into units as needed.
Similar process for virtually all nursing units in the hospital
Distribution techs get items for floors
Cycle Time: 20 min
VA Time:
# of Units:
Yield:
Start Time:
End Time:
Distance:
Staff:
Bring cart and any trash , excess items to dock.
Empty trash
Return to Dock
Cycle Time: 8 min; 2 min
VA Time:
# of Units:
Yield:
Start Time:
End Time:
Distance:
Staff:
StockRelease OrderLook for holes/and excessCycle count as neededDo a “does it look right?” scan
Stock Omnicell
Cycle Time: 24; 38; 84 min
VA Time:
# of Units:
Yield:
Start Time:11:30; 9:01; 11:40
End Time:11:54; 9:39; 13:04
Distance:
Staff:
Non Stock and Misc.
No Weekends
Print, separate andpPrioritize by expected delivery time and location.
Main Process: 7:00 am
Also prints every 30 minutes during the day
Omnicell and Lawson Orders
Cycle Time: 12 min
VA Time:
# of Units:
Yield:
Start Time: 6:48 am
End Time: 7:00 am
Distance:
Staff:1
Separates into zones. May make several cart trips per order .
Picker pulls order
Cycle Time:119 min; 95 min
VA Time:
# of Units: 124; 175
Yield:
Start Time:7:19am; 9:55 am
End Time:9:18am; 11:30 am
Distance:
Staff:
From inventory management system.
Issue produce out of inventory
Scan badge and pages to Access data base; productivity tool.
Process out of Inventory
Cycle Time:
VA Time:
# of Units:
Yield:
Start Time:
End Time:
Distance:
Staff:
Lawson or Omnicell Orders
Weekends use WH
Crew
Sort as they come off of truck into:PO – non stock ground and air
Misc PO
Add tracking label (Orange) to misc. PO. Items
Dock log items
Cycle Time:
VA Time:
# of Units:
Yield:
Start Time:
End Time:
Distance:
Staff:1
1) Refrigerated tissue, etc. – try to get on 10:30 truck2) The rest of the next day air3) Ground
Try to get 2 and 3 onto 12:30 truck
Prioritize
Cycle Time: 160 min
VA Time:
# of Units: 282
Yield:
Start Time:9:40 am
End Time: 12:00
Distance:
Staff: 5
Scan package to a particular pallet to a particular dock –Secondary Dock Log
Receive non-stock PO Items
Cycle Time:
VA Time:
# of Units:
Yield:
Start Time:
End Time:
Distance:
Staff:
Cath Lab and Special Procedures
No Weekends
South DockSt. Josephs DockJasmine Dock
Prestage for truck
Cycle Time: 4 min
VA Time:
# of Units:
Yield:
Start Time:
End Time:
Distance:
Staff:
Requisition items print 7:00 am Sort Check previous day’s schedule for excess and add-ons to requisitions.
Can get add-ons all through the day.
Print and sort items
Cycle Time:14.5 min; 19 min
# of Units:
Yield:
Start Time: 7:02 am; 1:51 pm
End Time: 7:16;30 am; 2:12 pm
Distance:
Staff:1
Place in toteRelease out of systemPut sticker on each tote
Pull supplies
Cycle Time: 20 min
VA Time:
# of Units:
Yield:
Start Time:7:25 am
End Time: 9:25 am
Distance:
Staff: 3
Put tote onto cart/pallet and wrap
Cycle Time: 5 min
VA Time:
# of Units:
Yield:
Start Time:8:35 am
End Time:8:30 am
Distance:
Staff:
SDC to SPD Delivery
Weekend SDC Crew
Sort.Separate print for Womans ORNeed to look in Cerner for special needs – ie latex free
Print cases for next day surgery
Cycle Time:30 min
VA Time:
# of Units:1557 line items
Yield:
Start Time: 8:55
End Time: 9:25
Distance:
Staff:1
8:30 – 10:30 CVOR, Vascular10:00 – others
Staged at 12:00 – 1:301;30 – get changes and add ons
Pick cases and put into tote; wrap
Cycle Time: 160 min
VA Time:
# of Units: 282
Yield:
Start Time:9:40 am
End Time: 12:00
Distance:
Staff: 3
Cancels and add-ons
Add/Delete Items
Cycle Time:8 min; 32 min
VA Time:
# of Units:
Yield:
Start Time:11:12 am 1:17 pm
End Time:11:20 am; 1:49 pm
Distance:
Staff:
SDC CasesPrint and pull add ons
Refresh schedule
Cycle Time:10 min
VA Time:
# of Units:
Yield:
Start Time:11:10
End Time:11:20
Distance:
Staff:1
Lawson or Omnicell Call Ins
(Urgent?)
Lawson or Omnicell Orders
Weekdays 3 crews;
Weekends 1 5 man crew
Non Stock PO; Misc
PO;
UPS and Fed Ex
No Weekend
SDC Requisition
Items
Weekday 5Weekend 1
Morning run; just receive items
Afternoon (delivered by distribution tech) – Sign off on delivery
Receive units
Cycle Time: 4 min
VA Time:
# of Units:
Yield:
Start Time: 1:34 pm;
End Time:1;38 pm
Distance:
Staff:1
6:00 am only
Retrieve from Dock
Cycle Time: 4 min
VA Time:
# of Units:
Yield:
Start Time: 5:42 am
End Time: 5:46 am
Distance:
Staff:
Must get signature for all items Except for call in or requisition template items.
May require multiple trips
Deliver items to units
Cycle Time: 95 min; 50 min
VA Time:
# of Units:
Yield:
Start Time:8:59 am;
End Time:10:34 am
Distance:
Staff:
By destination; plan route
Sort at Dock
Cycle Time: 53 min
VA Time:
# of Units:
Yield:
Start Time: 9:15
End Time: 10:08
Distance:
Staff:
PM delivery, match delivered items to orders.Print receipts for next daySort and Stock
Unpack and Stock Items in proper
location
Cycle Time: 26 min; 32 min
VA Time:
# of Units:
Yield:
Start Time 5:46 am, 1:38 pm
End Time: 6:12 am; 2:10 pm
Distance:
Staff: 1
Unload; Scan when delivered to SPD,
Cycle Time: 22 min
VA Time:
# of Units: 28 totes
Yield:
Start Time:3:34 pm
End Time: 3:56 pm
Distance:
Staff:
Truck Driver delivers SPD totes to SPD
Cycle Time: 3 min
VA Time:
# of Units:
Yield:
Start Time:
End Time:
Distance:
Staff:
Totes from previous day’s surgery
Return Empty totes to truck
Cycle Time: VA Time:
# of Units:
Yield:
Start Time:
End Time:
Distance:
Staff:
November 2012 study:
21% of all items returned$250,000 value of items returned
SDC Returns
Cycle Time: 34 min, 20 min
VA Time:
# of Units: 7 totes; 7 totes
Yield:
Start Time:
End Time:
Distance:
Staff:
Non Value Added (NVA)
Value Added with some NVA
Value Added (VA)
Lawson or Omnicell Orders
Lawson or Omnicell Call Ins (Urgent)
Non-Stock P.O.s and UPS / Fed Ex
OR Requisition Items
OR Cases
Materials Distribution: Current State Map
Lawson or Omnicell Orders
Non-Stock and Misc.
Cath Lab / Surgical Procedures
SDC to SPD to OR Deliveries
Richard Skiff – Synopsis of Healthcare ProjectsSupply Chain Processes: Current State Map
OR Emergency
Totes
Forms
Omnicell
Lawson Template
Set-up
Item is scanned out of Omnicell
Is itemPatient
Chargeable?
Decrements On Hand Quantity
NoOmnicell hits a Re-order point
Omnicell creates an electronic
Requisition file: “This is what I
need”
Lawson routes P.O. to a Buyer
Force a “Job” in Lawson
Lawson creates a P.O. for non-
stock item
Query to Omnicell: “How are you in stock
level?”
Is it a Stock
Item?
Decrements On Hand Quantity
account
Creates record of Patient and
Item
At 5:00 am; Omnicell transfers
information into Medipac
Medipac creates a patient bill
Yes
Cycle Count Correction of
Stock Amounts in Omnicell
during stocking.
No
Yes
P.O. sits in Buyer queue as
“Unreleased”
Buyer reviews P.O.
Revision needed?
Buyer revises order (Quantity,
Price, other)
Release item in Lawson
No
Yes
Lawson looks at available stock
on hand
Is enough quantity?
Lawson creates a pick ticket in Warehouse for each Omnicell
Item is Picked (Mtls Distribution
VSM)
Lawson “Kills” Quantity, may
revise with lower Qty.
Lawson sends an email to
requestor about Qty change
Prints “Killed” items at bottom
of ticket
A Pseudo pick ticket prints at
“From” Warehouse
When received at “To” WH, does release of “In Transit Receipt”
and increments receiving WH
Yes
No
If only one item on P.O., Lawson will not print a pick
ticket.
Item has reached a Par or
below level in Warehouse
Lawson create a PO
for Item?
Sometimes Qty is to be transferred from
another warehouse
Pick items and ship
WH does “In Transit” receipt
release and Decrements “From” WH
No, Transfer
Warehouse Perpetual
Orders
Is Vendor set up
EDI?
Order goes to GHX (Clearing
House)
GHX sends order to Vendor
Vendor confirms order
Buyer gets On-line confirmation
Enough to fulfill order?
Yes No
Vendor set up
Autofax?
Lawson job looks for
released Autofax POs
Autofax order to Vendor
Email from Autofax to Vendor;
“I sent P.O.”, Confirms by Fax
Vendor feeds back expected
ship date
Yes
No
Lawson prints out order
Vendor Confirms order
Buyer calls or faxes vendor
No
Yes
Buyer gets back with requestor
Is revised ship
date OK?
Is there a substitute available
Requestor has to wait.
No No
Yes
Create a new P.O.
Yes
Lawson Template
Items
Unit orders via a
Lawson Template
Unit completes the order and
releases it
Requisition created in Lawson
Go through Lawson approval
process
Hand Held Orders (Open Stock)
Both Stock and Non
Stock items
Mtlscoordinator
orders item via Handheld (Lawson)
Transmits order to Mobile Supply Chain (MSCM)
Non Lawson Orders
(Specials and New
Items)
Unit sends ina requisition
form to purchaser
Paper/Faxed
Has this item been
ordered before?
Is Vendor Approved
Item Qty meet “Add to Lawson”
Criteria?
Doesitem need Product Review?
Can it be purchased someplace
else?
Will it be ordered again?
Feedback to requestor that
item needs to go through product review process
Product Review Process
Add Vendor to Lawson
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No
NoYes
Yes IT Adds item to Lawson
Put into Template or Par
No
New Entity or Department to
be set up in Lawson
Go to Finance to create; Maps to “X” Cost Center
Is Cost Center set up in
Lawson?
Finance sends out email that “I’ve created
Cost Center and its Called Y”
Materials tries to determine if this cost center will
order stuff
If so, creates a requesting location in Lawson
Someone in this cost center
orders something
Materials asks “Who are you and what cost
center are you?”
Set up requesting
location for cost center.
Are you a “Requestor”
Are you authorized to order for this cost
center?
Send computer services
authorization form
When done, email sent back to Materials IT
Yes Yes
No No
Get authorization
and set up their profile
Is there a template set up?
No
YesReady to order
Dialog with unit for needs. Look to see if there is “someone like
you.”
Build Template
Yes
No
Equipment New Equipment Request
Is it Capital?(> $5K)
Capital Buyer gets OK to purchase
Clinical Equipment Approval Process
Lease or Use
Agreement Process
Rental Equipment
Process
Fill out request in Ascend Software
Doesit have Lawson
Number?
Is it on a Template?
No
No
Yes Bidding and Vendor
Approval Process
Is item over $25K
Pass MD Buyline?
Is it Biomed?
No
Yes
No
YesTo B
Yes Review through MD Buyline
Process
Place PO with vendor
Periodic status updates
between buyer and vendor
Receive Equipment in Ridgefield or
designated other location
Go through Biomed approval
process
Install Equipment
Yes Yes
No
Go back to department for
No
Requisition to Materials that
someone needs more of that
form
New form is created
someplace
Forms Approval Process
Does Lawson have Form
Template?
Requester goes to
Printshop Process
Yes To B
No
Prints out Spreadshe
et order form
OR orders replenishm
ent emergency
tote
Is there a tote ready?
Fax to SDC
Stage to put on next
truck for delivery
Build the tote
Yes
No
Vendor Ships Order
To A
A
To C
B
C
Need Follow-Up Process Map
Develop clear guidelines on what
needs to go through product review.
There is a new Product Review Process (Value
Analysis Process) instituted 2/6/13; but it has
not been fully vetted.
Floor Stock Patient Equipment Distribution
Process (exp – IV pumps, Dynamaps, etc.)
To B
Credit Card Purchase
Post Product Review
Transactional Processes.
Mapped 2/21/13
It does not appear that there is a Recall Process for products
or equipment
It does not appear that there is an
Equipment Review/Approval Process
Equipment
Non- Lawson (Special) Orders
Lawson Template Set-Up
Lawson Template Items
Hand Held Orders (Open Stock)
Warehouse Perpetual Orders
Omnicell Orders
Forms
OR Emergency Totes
Transactional Ordering Process Map
Richard Skiff – Synopsis of Healthcare Projects
Post Value Analysis (Product Approval Process Map)
Need to define this process
Creates Excel Spreadsheet with
information and sends to DatabaseSpecialst II.
100% Manual Entry
An item has been approved Value
Analysis (i.e. Product Approval) and is to be
made ready for purchase.
Is it a Surgical Material?
Contract person generates letter
of approval
Send a letter of approval to Team Lead,
Materials, and Vendor.
No. Comes out of Clinical Materials Product Review
E
Assumes that the New Process (2/6/2013) is
in place
Yes
Contract Administrator
sends information to
Data Base Specialist:
Contains: Vendor Product Number Description Unit of Measure
Buy Distribute
Pricing Par Levels
Adds Ship to Location
Stock/Non-Stock/Facility
Check for Duplicates in
Lawson
Assign Lawson
Number to Item(s)
Upload to Lawson“Lawson
Build”
DB I Add: Type Cost Department CDM (Charge Master #) Markup Price Scale
(Price to Patient: “Extended Price”
DB II sends Excel file back to:
DB I Contracts
A
B
Contracts uploads file to
Access
DB IOpen “Item Class
Template” in Cerner
Copy and Paste Item Number (Lawson) and
Class into Template
.CSV
Save resulting file in .CSV format
File in C:Drive “Item Master Active”
Go to Explorer menu in Cerner;
click“Execute Query
Output Item Master”
After Class, repeat for Location and Locator; each
location must be done separately
Open Access, Delete current “Item Master Active File”
Import New .CSV file into Access.
1) “Item Master Active”2) Create Backup File
Run Query in Access- produces file.
Compares Lawson Item Master to Cerner
Item Master –Produces new items.
Cerner file exported to “Prod Weekly”
Excel File New items need to
build in Cerner
Pull vendor Price File (Access) and match to Lawson Build
File
Output file with: Lawson Number Vendor Item Number Price Unit of Measure Description
Export back to Excel
Go into Lawson; Create Vendor
Agreement Header
Is File over 50 Items?
Send to DB II to Auto Upload
Key in ManuallyNo
Yes
Copy and paste “Prod Weekly” file into Cerner Items Upload File .CSV
Cerner Item Master Template
In Cerner, go to “Materials
Management Upload Manager”
After A, B, C, loops, this is the last step in this loop
Cerner exists to have clinical documentation and make items patient chargable
Contract person activates “Release” function in Lawson
Item can now be purchased
Import .CSV fileCommit
Check for Errors.
If after “A” loop, then do not do an error
check.Go to “B”.
After “B” loop, go to “C”
C
Are there any errors?
Create and send Change Upload File (Excel) to
DB II
Manually correct errors in Cerner
Yes
Manually make corrections in Lawson
Item built in Item Master
A
Wait for Cerner Ops
Jobs10:00 am; 1:00 pm
Cerner Ops Job populates
Pricing Tool
No
Manually to into each item number and item location,
click “Group Complete.” (Pricing tool application)
Open Explorer menu in Cerner
Run “Pricing Tool Data” file
Exit Cerner. Save as
Excel file in Pricing Tool
Reports
Open Access.Import Pricing Tool
File and the File from the Build.
B
Run Access Query to
compare the two files.
Query produces combined Excel file:
“Query Upload.date”
Export file to “Upload Files
for Donna”
Go into Excel and open the
file
Manipulate file to add: Supply (copy and
paste) Different Header Add bill code Add price schedule
cost and mark up.
Save as .CSV in “Upload Files for Donna.”
Email to “Donna” -(Cerner Person)
Cerner uploads to Pricing Tool
Load into “Item Entry System (Access)
Lawson Number Approver Store Location Vendor Number,
etc. Chargeable?
New Item?Is it a
Cerner Item?
No, it’s a replacement
Send to DB II
Upload to Lawson
Yes
No
Lawson creates file
(Still Access)
Contract Person(s)
manually review file to determine items needing
action
Approver: Go to Vendor.Email:
Mfg Code Usage
Vendor notifies Mission their ETA to ship
stock
Set up contract
Approver sometimes has
to “nudge” contract person
by email
Send email to Surgical Materials manager
Surgical materials manager
determines: Usage Locations
Communicate change to
various locations
Notify DB I to make change in
Cerner
Notify DB II to make change in
Lawson
DBI adds additional mfg to
Cerner
Manually change price in Pricing Tool (if needed)
Release Contract
Enters Order Process at Unit:
Omnicell Lawson Template Special Orders Etc.
Communicate to Users that “Item is available to order.”
The timing of this communication is critical – to balance ordering with when it will be
available from vendor.
Yes
FUTURE STATE
Item is approved (2/6/13 Process)
Clear message from Value Advisor to
Execute
Information arrives from Vendor in Mission Excel
Template
DB I adds Mission Specific information
Lawson and Cerner dialog and put out a
final product
Look for duplicate: Descriptions Manufacturing Item
Numbers
Manual fix
Generate exception report for conflicts.
Fix manually
Buyer Message Item comes in with
Differences from P.O.
InvoiceReceiving
Found that this process takes over 30 steps, and involves 17 file format changes!
Richard Skiff – Synopses of Healthcare Projects
Root Cause Analysis of
Patient Safety Events
ADDITIONAL “Projects”
58© 2013
Richard Skiff – Synopses of Healthcare Projects
• Neptune Recall
• WOW Cart Overheating
• Propofol Syringe in Patient Room
• Propofol Syringe in NTICU
• OR Vacuum Reduction
• Direct Admit Flu Exposure
• Surgical Sight Specific Infection
• Phenobarbital Detox
• NICU Freezer Failure
• Vancomycin Extra Dosage
• Cardiologist Office Wrong Echocardiogram
• Trocar Injury
• Physician Office Complaint
Patient Safety Events:Root Cause Analyses Facilitated