r r i-95 safety improvements at route 3 · i-95 safety improvements at route 3 city of...

Response to Request for Proposals

I-95 SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS AT ROUTE 3City of Fredericksburg, Virginia

State Project No.: 0095-111-278Federal Project No.: OC-095-2(535)Contract ID Nmber: C00107715DB91

LETTER OF SUBMITTAL

Submit ted by:

in ASSociAtion With:

ORIGINAL

ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-95 Safety Improvements at Route 3

LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS

1 of 2

Offerors shall furnish a copy of this Letter of Submittal Checklist, with the page references added, with the Letter of Submittal.

Letter of Submittal Component Form (if any) RFP Part 1 Cross Reference

Page Reference

Letter of Submittal Checklist and Contents Attachment 4.0.1.1 Section 4.0.1.1 N/A

Acknowledgement of RFP, Revisions, and/or Addenda Attachment 3.4 (Form C-78-RFP) Sections 3.4; 4.0.1.1 N/A

Letter of Submittal NA Sections 4.1

Letter of Submittal on Offeror’s letterhead NA Section 4.1.1 1

Offeror’s full legal name and address NA Section 4.1.1 1

Authorized representative’s original signature NA Section 4.1.1 1

Declaration of intent NA Section 4.1.2 1

120 day declaration NA Section 4.1.3 1

Point of Contact information NA Section 4.1.4 1

Principal Officer information NA Section 4.1.5 1

Offeror’s Corporate Structure NA Section 4.1.6 1

Full Legal Name of Lead Contractor, Lead Designer, and QAM NA Section 4.1.7 1

Offeror’s VDOT prequalification information NA Section 4.1.8 1

DBE statement confirming Offeror is committed to achieving the required DBE goal NA Section 4.1.9 1

Final Completion Date NA Section 4.1.10 1

ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 I-95 Safety Improvements at Route 3

LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS

2 of 2

Letter of Submittal Component Form (if any) RFP Part 1 Cross Reference

Page Reference

Attachments to the Letter of Submittal NA Section 4.2

Affiliated and/ or Subsidiary Companies Attachment 4.2.1 Section 4.2.1 2-3

Certification Regarding Debarment Forms Attachment 4.2.2(a)

Attachment 4.2.2(b) Section 4.2.2 4-6

Offeror’s VDOT prequalification information NA Section 4.2.3 7

Evidence of obtaining bonding NA Section 4.2.4 8-10

Full size copies of DPOR licenses and SCC registrations NA Section 4.2.5 12-19

SCC registration information - businesses Attachment 4.2.5 Section 4.2.5.1 11

DPOR registration information - businesses Attachment 4.2.5 Section 4.2.5.2 11

Lead Contractor Work History Form Attachment 4.2.6(a) Section 4.2.6 20-22

Lead Designer Work History Form Attachment 4.2.6(b) Section 4.2.6 23-25

Conceptual Roadway Plans NA Section 4.2.7 26-35

4.1 - Letter of Submittal

4.1 - Letter of Submittal

4.2 - Attachments To The Letter Of Submittal

4.2 - Attachments To The Letter Of Subm

ittal

4.2.1 - Affiliated and/or Subsidiary Com

panies

4.2.1 - Affiliated and/or Subsidiary Companies

ATTACHMENT 4.2.1 State Project No. 0095-111-278

Affiliated and Subsidiary Companies of the Offeror

2

Offerors shall complete the table and include the addresses of affiliates or subsidiary companies as applicable. By completing this table, Offerors certify that all affiliated and subsidiary companies of the Offeror are listed.

The Offeror does not have any affiliated or subsidiary companies. X Affiliated and/ or subsidiary companies of the Offeror are listed below.

Relationship with Offeror (Affiliate or Subsidiary) Full Legal Name Address

Affiliate Atkinson Construction 7500 Old Georgetown Road, Bethesda, MD 20814

Affiliate Atkinson Contractors, LP 7500 Old Georgetown Road, Bethesda, MD 20814

Affiliate Shirley Design/Build, LLC 8435 Backlick Road, Lorton, Virginia 22079

Affiliate SCC Infrastructure 7500 Old Georgetown Road, Bethesda, MD 20814

Affiliate Clark Construction Group, LLC 7500 Old Georgetown Road, Bethesda, MD 20814

Affiliate Clark Civil Construction, LLC 7500 Old Georgetown Road, Bethesda, MD 20814

Affiliate Clark Concrete Contractors, LLC 7500 Old Georgetown Road, Bethesda, MD 20814

Affiliate Clark Construction International, LLC 7500 Old Georgetown Road, Bethesda, MD 20814

Affiliate Clark Construction, LLC 7500 Old Georgetown Road, Bethesda, MD 20814

Affiliate Clark Design/Build, LLC 7500 Old Georgetown Road, Bethesda, MD 20814

Affiliate Clark Facility Services, LLC 7500 Old Georgetown Road, Bethesda, MD 20814

Affiliate Clark Foundations, LLC 7500 Old Georgetown Road, Bethesda, MD 20814

Affiliate Clark Global Technologies, LLC 7500 Old Georgetown Road, Bethesda, MD 20814


Affiliated and Subsidiary Companies of the Offeror

3

Relationship with Offeror (Affiliate or Subsidiary) Full Legal Name Address

Affiliate Clark Strategic Operations Group, LLC 7500 Old Georgetown Road, Bethesda, MD 20814

Affiliate Clark Real Estate Advisors, LLC 7500 Old Georgetown Road, Bethesda, MD 20814

Affiliate Clark/Balfour Beatty NCE, A Joint Venture 7500 Old Georgetown Road, Bethesda, MD 20814

Affiliate Edgemoor Real Estate Services, LLC 7500 Old Georgetown Road, Bethesda, MD 20814

Affiliate Innovative Infrastructure, LLC 8435 Backlick Road, Lorton, Virginia 22079

Affiliate Loudoun County Transportation Networks, LLC 7500 Old Georgetown Road, Bethesda, MD 20814

Affiliate Metro Earthworks, 8435 Backlick Road, Lorton, Virginia 22079

Affiliate Route 28 Corridor Improvements, LLC 8435 Backlick Road, Lorton, Virginia 22079

Affiliate Shirley Pentagon Constructors,, LLC 8435 Backlick Road, Lorton, Virginia 22079

Affiliate Shirley/Clark Loudoun Infrastructure, LLC 8435 Backlick Road, Lorton, Virginia 22079

Affiliate Charlottesville Bypass Constructors, A Joint Venture 8435 Backlick Road, Lorton, Virginia 22079

Affiliate Capital Rail Constructors, a JV 7500 Old Georgetown Road, Bethesda, MD 20814

Affiliate Maryland Transit Connectors 7500 Old Georgetown Road, Bethesda, MD 20814

4.2.2 - Debarment Form

s

4.2.2 - Debarment Forms

4.2.3 - Prequalification Certificate

4.2.3 - Prequalification Certificate

4.2.4 - Surety Letter4.2.4 - Surety Letter

4.2.5 - SCC Registrations/DPOR Licenses

4.2.5 - SCC Registrations/DPOR Licenses


SCC and DPOR Information

11

Offerors shall complete the table and include the required state registration and licensure information. By completing this table, Offerors certify that their team complies with the requirements set forth in Section 4.2.5 and that all businesses listed are active and in good standing.

SCC & DPOR INFORMATION FOR BUSINESSES (RFP Sections 4.2.5.1 and 4.2.5.2)

Business Name

SCC Information (4.2.5.1) DPOR Information (4.2.5.2)

SCC Number

SCC Type of Corporation

SCC Status

DPOR Registered Address

DPOR Registration

Type DPOR Registration

Number DPOR Expiration

Date

Shirley Contracting Company, LLC S082038-3 Limited

Liability Co. Active 8435 Backlick Road Lorton, Va. 22079

Class A Contractor 2705071652 October 31, 2018

Dewberry Consultants LLC S044733-6 Limited

Liability Co Active 8401 Arlington Blvd. Fairfax, Va. 22031

Business Entity 0407003966 December 31, 2017

Quinn Consulting Services, Inc. 0492551-7 Corporation Active

14160 Newbrook Drive Suite 220

Chantilly, Va. 20151

Business Entity 0407003733 December 31, 2017

4.2.6 - Work History Form

s

4.2.6 - Work History Forms

ATTACHMENT 4.2.6(a)

LEAD CONTRACTOR - WORK HISTORY FORM

(LIMIT 1 PAGE PER PROJECT)

I - 95 SAFE T Y I MP ROVE M E NT S AT R OUT E 3 CI T Y O F FRE DE RI C KSB U R G, VI RGI NI A

A DE SI GN- B UI LD PR OJE CT

a. Project Name & Location b. Name of the prime designconsulting firm responsiblefor the overall projectdesign.

c. Contact information of the Client or Owner andtheir Project Manager who can verify Firm’sresponsibilities.

d. ContractCompletionDate(Original)

e. ContractCompletionDate (Actualor Estimated)

f. Contract Value (in thousands) g. Dollar Value of Work Performedby the Firm identified as the LeadContractor for this procurement.(inthousands)

Original Contract Value

Final or Estimated Contract Value

Name: Route 50 Widening

Location: Fairfax and Loudoun Counties,

Virginia

Name: Dewberry Consultants LLC

Name of Client/Owner: Virginia Department of

Transportation

Project Manager: Susan Shaw, PE Phone: 703-259-1995

Email: [email protected]

12/2014

12/2015*

*Difference Due toOwner added scope

$67,830

$77,337*


$77,337

h. Narrative describing the Work Performed by the Firm identified as the Lead Contractor for this procurement. If the Offeror chooses to submit work completed by an affiliated or subsidiary company of the Lead Contractor, identify the full legal name of the affiliate or subsidiaryand the role they will have on this Project, so the relevancy of that work can be considered accordingly. The Work History Form shall include only one singular project. Projects with multiple phases, segments, elements, and/or contracts shall not be considered a single project. If aproject listed includes multiple phases, segments, elements, and/or contracts, the SOQ may be rendered non-responsive. In any case, only the first phase, segment, element, and/or contract listed will be evaluated.

PROJECT NARRATIVE:

In March 2011, Shirley Contracting Company, LLC (Shirley) was awarded the Route 50 Widening Design-Build Project (the Project) by the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT). The $77 million project included the reconstruction and widening of Route 50 from 4 to 6-lanes for 3.7-miles from Poland Road (Route 742) to Sully Road (Route 28). One major feature of the Project included right-of-way and temporary/permanent easement acquisitions on 68 properties along the corridor. There were numerous utilities in conflict that had to be relocated. These included overhead/underground power (15,000'), overhead/underground communications (50,000'), gas line relocations (4,000'), sanitary line relocations (1100') and waterline relocations (17,000'). Another important feature was the construction of eight new traffic signals which needed to be maintained during all phases of traffic. In addition, the new roadway construction included two new bridges over Cub Run, a new 10' wide shared use path for each side of the roadway, a new retaining wall (400'), two new box culverts (485'), all new roadway pavement, new storm pipe (31,000'), and storm structures (300 each). The Project required the management of several challenging issues. One of the largest issues was the coordination of utility relocations and right-of-way acquisition in a linear transportation corridor where the majority of the widening resulted in direct utility conflicts. The Team overcame this challenge by closely coordinating the Transportation Management Plan with the right-of-way and utility relocation priorities to ensure that adequate float was provided to third party controlled utility relocations without compromising the aggressive schedule. A key element was creating a sequence that optimized the amount of ultimate roadway that could be constructed concurrent with the acquisition of right-of-way, permits, and the relocation of the utilities. The Team accomplished this by reversing the original RFP sequence of construction and utilizing the median. Additionally, detours were constructed that allowed for the start of reconstruction of the existing pavement within the existing right-of-way. This sequence allowed the right-of-way acquisition and utility relocation phases to run parallel with the early phases of construction and decrease the risk of utility delays that would ultimately impact the final completion date.

PROJECT SCOPE: • 3.7 Miles of Roadway Widening from 4 to 6-Lanes• Extensive coordination and relocation of facilities owned by 15 different utility companies• Acquisition of environmental permits• Improvements to eight signalized intersections• Four new storm water management facilities• Widening and reconstruction of the existing bridges over Cub Run• Right-of-way acquisitions of 68 parcels including one relocation• Contractor administered quality assurance and quality control• Coordination of public involvement• Coordination of waterline relocations with Fairfax Water Authority & Loudoun Water

SHIRLEY'S ROLE:

As the Design-Builder and Lead Contractor, Shirley was responsible for management and oversight of all aspects of construction, including design and engineering, right-of-way acquisitions, permitting, coordination of utility relocations, public outreach before and during the project, overall Project administration and construction management, and Quality Assurance and Quality Control. All construction work was performed on a heavily traveled roadway with over 60,000 vehicles per day passing through the Project. Lane restrictions were coordinated by Shirley with VDOT to allow for public notifications of impacts to traffic. Shirley was the primary point of contact with the Owner in public relations and getting notices out to traveling motorists, businesses, home-owners and local politicians. Shirley was also responsible for creating and monitoring the schedule throughout design and construction.

VERIFIABLE EVIDENCE OF GOOD PERFORMANCE: 1. This aggressively scheduled project was completed on time, without claims, and with

change orders that consisted primarily of owner-directed modifications to add projectscope.

2. The success of this Project was largely due to significant innovations to Maintenanceof Traffic (MOT) during design and construction. During the design process, a sequenceof construction was planned that utilized the median for the first phase of construction sothat work could be done in existing VDOT right-of-way which allowed constructionactivities to be completed simultaneously with the acquisition of right-of-way. During thelater phases of the Project, the sequence of roadway construction was modified to runparallel with the order at which the right-of-way properties were being acquired and theutility relocations being completed. This improved the flow of the schedule and allowedthe project to be completed on-time.

3. Shirley developed work schedules and activity plans to minimize disruptions andimpacts to the public. One example was the reconstruction of an existing intersection inone weekend instead of taking weeks of daily lane closures. This was accomplished byShirley mobilizing extra crews over the weekend and working around the clock in orderto have the intersection rebuilt in one weekend. This required coordination betweenShirley and VDOT to develop an MOT plan and sequence of work for the weekendoperations, as well as public notifications that were sent to the media and local politicians.This approach proved so successful that it was used on several other intersections.

4. Shirley worked closely with local Supervisors, Delegates, and local fire and rescue, tosend out public notifications for any major work activities or shifts in traffic patterns onthe Project. An email distribution list was also developed from the preconstruction"pardon our dust" meetings and quarterly local town hall meetings which were also usedfor public notifications. The local town hall meetings were used as a way to keep thelocal homeowners and businesses well informed of the Project status.

SIMILARITIES TO I-95

SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS AT ROUTE 3

• Design-Build Delivery• Primary Roadway Widening• Intersection Improvements• Signalization of Eight Intersections• Phased Construction• Maintenance of Traffic• Right-of-Way Acquisition• Environmental Permitting• Utility Relocations & Avoidance• Quality Assurance/Quality Control• Transportation Management Plan• Public Involvement and Outreach• Third Party Stakeholder Communication &

Coordination• Worked with Lead Designer – Dewberry

20

ATTACHMENT 4.2.6(a)







d. ContractCompletionDate (Original)





Name: Route 27/244 Interchange

Modifications

Location: Arlington, Virginia

Name: Dewberry Consultants LLC

Name of Client/Owner: Virginia Department of

Transportation

Project Manager: Christiana Briganti-Dunn, PE, CCM Phone: 703-259-2960


8/2015

9/2015*


$31,400

$32,550*


$32,550


PROJECT NARRATIVE:

In August 2011, the Shirley Design-Build Team comprised of Shirley Contracting Company, LLC (Shirley) as the Lead Contractor, and Dewberry Consultants LLC (Dewberry) as the Lead Designer, was awarded the Route 27/244 Design-Build Project (the Project) by the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT). The Project included the complete reconstruction of the existing 70-year-old bridge carrying Route 27 (Washington Boulevard) over Route 244 (Columbia Pike) and replacement of the existing box culvert conveying Long Branch through the middle of the interchange. The new, longer, and wider bridge included significant aesthetic features including decorative parapets and abutment walls, memorial pylons at the bridge corners, and haunched girders with a two-tone paint scheme to mimic the arch structure of the old bridge. A light well separates the westbound and eastbound lanes. The bridge also accommodated the widening of Columbia Pike also constructed as part of the Project. In addition, the project included reconfiguration of the interchange ramps to improve safety and community access, signalization of three intersections, removal of one existing traffic signal along Route 244, overhead sign structures, shared use path and sidewalk facilities with connections to existing facilities on Route 244, retaining walls, box culverts, major drainage structures, right-of-way acquisition, utilities design, coordination, and relocation, sound barrier, storm drainage, storm water management and landscaping.

A significant element of the Project was the replacement of an existing 10’ x 7.5’ box culvert that conveyed Long Branch through the center of the Project and was integral with the substructure of the existing bridge. The Team developed a culvert and bridge design concept with a new double 10’ x 10’ culvert aligned through the new bridges while maintaining structural independence between the design elements. This alignment optimized the culvert length, eliminated the need to tunnel large diameter pipes under Washington Boulevard, and minimized the impacts to the Long Branch Flood Plain. This concept also modified the location of the culvert outfall to minimize erosion that has been a maintenance concern for VDOT and Arlington County for many years.

PROJECT SCOPE: • Bridge construction including decorative parapets and abutment walls• Memorial pylons at bridge corners• Haunched girders with two-tone paint scheme• Widening of Columbia Pike• Reconfiguration of interchange ramps• Signalization of three intersections• Overhead sign structures• Shared use path• Retaining walls• 10’ x 10” Double Box culvert• Drainage structures• Sound Barrier• Storm Water Management

SHIRLEY'S ROLE:

As the Design-Builder and Lead Contractor, Shirley was responsible for management and oversight of construction, including design and engineering, right-of-way acquisitions, permitting, utility relocations, public outreach, overall Project administration and construction management, and QA and QC. Lane restrictions were coordinated by Shirley with VDOT to allow for public notifications of impacts to traffic. Shirley was the primary point of contact with the Owner in public relations and getting notices out to traveling motorists, businesses, home-owners and local politicians. Shirley was also responsible for creating and monitoring the schedule throughout design and construction.

VERIFIABLE EVIDENCE OF GOOD PERFORMANCE: 1. To address these stakeholder concerns, our Team engaged regularly with the community

through meetings where concerns were discussed and solutions were offered. Beloware examples of how our Team addressed concerns:• We changed the sequence of construction to eliminate planned night work that was

allowed by the contract.• The Team modified the design which resulted in changes to the planned Maintenance

of Traffic (MOT) on the Project. This resulted in a reduction of impacts toneighboring residential communities and to the hotel. The Team’s response to thecommunity concerns were above and beyond what was required by the contractand is an example of how we provided value to the Owner and project stakeholders.

2. The presence of Potomac Formation clays and silts presented problems with slopeinstability and excessive shrink/swell characteristics. Increasing the complexity of thesesubsurface materials where the planned fill slopes and varying height retaining walls, upto 25’, required to widen the existing roadways. Our Team selected the most costeffective alternatives. For global stability concerns at fill slopes, H-piles were driven at6’ spacing to achieve the required factor of safety for stability. To save costs, wecoordinated the design of temporary shoring systems at the bridge approaches so shoringpiles could be left in place and double as global stability piles. At larger fills wheresettlement was a concern, we reduced loading on compressible materials through the useof lightweight cementitious fill for the embankment and retaining wall backfill. Thematerial reduced the total loading and expected settlement on the compressible claylayers by more than 50%. It also eliminated the need for long settlement wait timesduring construction enabling the project to proceed on schedule and budget.

3. The Project scope also included modifications to the interchange ramps to improve safetyand address multi-modal transportation issues. Our Team worked closely with VDOT tooptimize the ramp alignment while balancing the need to upgrade the existing interchangeto current design standards with the need to minimize the right-of-way impacts outsideof the current tight urban footprint. Through this effort our Team was able to eliminatedesign exceptions and 21 of the 32 design waivers that VDOT’s RFP indicated wouldbe required. The Project was completed on schedule.



• Design-Build Delivery• Primary Roadway Widening• Signalization of Three Intersections• Phased Construction• Maintenance of Traffic• Right-of-Way Acquisition• Environmental Permitting• Utility Relocations & Avoidance• Quality Assurance/Quality Control• Transportation Management Plan• Public Involvement and Outreach• Third Party Stakeholder Communication &


21

ATTACHMENT 4.2.6(a)







d. ContractCompletionDate (Original)





Name: I-66/Route 29 Linton Hall

Interchange

Location: Gainesville, Virginia

Name: Dewberry Consultants

LLC Name of Client/Owner: Virginia Department of

Transportation

Project Manager: Mehrdad Naderi Phone: 703-259-2217


6/2015

9/2015*


$74,389

$78,087*


$78,087


PROJECT NARRATIVE:

The Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) awarded Shirley Contracting Company, LLC (Shirley) the I-66/Route 29/Linton Hall Interchange Improvements Project in Gainesville, Virginia. This Design-Bid-Build project is one of the largest unit price construction projects in Virginia and is the final phase of the Gainesville/I-66 Improvements project (in which Shirley completed Phase III, $81.4 million I-66 Widening). The $76 million project included a pair of overpasses: one carrying Route 29 over the Norfolk Southern Railroad, and one carrying Linton Hall Road and John Marshall Highway over the railroad and Route 29. To further improve traffic flow, Shirley also widened Route 29 to 6-lanes and eliminated driveway entrances and two traffic signals between I-66 and Virginia Oaks Drive. The new, grade-separated interchange at Route 29/Linton Hall Road created a limited-access facility on Route 29 between Virginia Oaks Drive and Heathcote Boulevard. The phased construction also included construction and removal of several traffic detours during construction; over $1 million of earthwork operations including 105,000 cubic yards of excavation and 947,000 cubic yards of embankment; ground improvements; storm water and water utility installation and relocation(s); approximately 59,100 tons of aggregate base; 123,500 tons of asphalt; signal installation/modifications; roadway lighting, TMS and signage; concrete crash walls; 10 MSE retaining walls consisting of approximately 288,000 SF.

A schedule challenge was the erection of 172 prestressed concrete girders over the active Norfolk Southern Railway for bridges that spanned the rail. Being unable to alter any train schedules to perform this work, our Team developed a plan which allowed for all equipment to be located outside the active track area. Working closely with Norfolk Southern, we identified a time when there were only two trains during a 10 hour period. Unfortunately, these two trains were critical for Norfolk Southern. Knowing that we could manage the schedule daily, we elected to utilize this 10 hour period as our erection window. Crews successfully completed the erection of all girders without delay or impact to the Norfolk Southern system. We also combined the final two phases of construction and accelerated construction of those phase from three months each to four weeks total. These final phases consisted of connecting two ramps across an existing detour road.

PROJECT SCOPE: • Four new bridges• Retaining walls• TMS and signage/installation• Concrete crash walls• Roadway lighting• Precast concrete panels• Traffic Control• Guardrail• Pedestrian sidewalk• Utility relocation/installation• Traffic detours

SHIRLEY'S ROLE:

As the Design-Builder and Lead Contractor, Shirley was responsible for management and oversight of construction, including design and engineering, right-of-way acquisitions, permitting, utility relocations, public outreach, overall Project administration and construction management, and QA and QC. All construction work was performed on a heavily traveled roadway. Lane restrictions were coordinated by Shirley with VDOT to allow for public notifications of impacts to traffic. Shirley was the primary point of contact with the Owner in public relations and getting notices out to traveling motorists, businesses, home-owners and local politicians. Shirley was also responsible for creating and monitoring the schedule throughout design and construction.

VERIFIABLE EVIDENCE OF GOOD PERFORMANCE: 1. The rail lines were at high skews to traffic flows on both Route 29 and Route 55, which

created challenges for normal design and construction techniques. To overcome thesechallenges, two bridges were designed/constructed with girder elements perpendicular tothe railroad and not parallel to traffic flowing over top of the NSR, which is atypical. Thisresulted in span lengths of the structures being reduced to lengths so that prestressedconcrete girders could be utilized instead of steel girders. If the girders were placedparallel to traffic flowing over top of the railroad, the bridge span distance would havebeen increased over 10 times of that as designed and constructed. This would have createdlarger bridge structures that would have to be constructed and maintained. The use ofprestressed concrete girders also resulted in lower maintenance costs and longer servicelife for the bridges. Since the bridge girders were on a large skew to traffic flowing overthe new bridges, unusual construction techniques had to also be utilized in placing thebridge deck slabs due to the variations in bolsters over the beams so that a smooth uniformriding surface was constructed for traffic. Overall, this innovative approach to the bridgespans being constructed perpendicular to the rail lines resulted in significantly smallerspans, smaller overall structures, and reduced maintenance and increased service life.

2. The project is an award winning project that has been recognized for design innovationand excellence in asphalt pavement. Its phased construction required extensivecoordination and detailed oversight of intricate construction elements to avoid issues asthe phases of construction progressed all the while maintaining a high quality project.

3. The project has improved traffic flow with smooth riding courses, reduced congestion,improved both motorists and pedestrian safety, and is aesthetically appealing.

4. The Teams public outreach efforts included “pardon our dust” meetings with localcommunity associations to provide updates on the Project and upcoming trafficimpacts. Variable message signs were also used to give advance notification to thetraveling public on traffic shifts and project milestones. The Team also communicateddirectly with the adjacent property owners and businesses about construction thatwould impact them as needed. They also coordinated outreach to county officials andsupervisors on a quarterly basis and prior significant traffic switches.



• Design-Bid-Build Delivery• Interstate Construction/Reconstruction• Signalization/Modifications• Maintenance of Traffic• Phased Construction• Right-of-Way Acquisition• Environmental Permitting• Utility Relocations & Avoidance• Quality Assurance/Quality Control• Transportation Management Plan• Public Involvement and Outreach• Third Party Stakeholder Communication &


22

ATTACHMENT 4.2.6(b) LEAD DESIGNER - WORK HISTORY FORM


I - 95 SAFE T Y I MP ROVE ME NT S AT R OUT E 3 CI T Y O F FRE DE RI C KSB UR G, VI RGI NI A


a. Project Name & Location b. Name of the prime/ generalcontractor responsible for overallconstruction of the project.

c. Contact information of the Client andtheir Project Manager who can verifyFirm’s responsibilities.

d. ConstructionContract StartDate

e. ConstructionContract CompletionDate (Actual orEstimated)

f. Contract Value (in thousands) g. Design Fee for the WorkPerformed by the Firm identifiedas the Lead Designer for thisprocurement.(in thousands)

Construction Contract Value (Original)

Construction Contract Value (Actual or Estimated)

Name: Interstate 66 Improvements (Single Design Contract) Location: Prince William County, VA

Name: Ph. I General Excavation Ph. II Moore Brothers Ph. III Shirley Contracting Ph. IV General Excavation Ph. V Shirley Contracting

Name of Client.: VDOT Northern Virginia District Office Project Manager: Amir Salahshoor, PE Phone: 703-259-1957 Email: [email protected]

6/2004

Phase I – 2008 Phase II – 2006

Phase III – 8/2010 Phase IV – 10/2011 Phase V – 8/2015

$215,000 (Estimated)

Phase I - IV $217,145*


$10,007

h. Narrative describing the Work Performed by the Firm identified as the Lead Designer for this procurement. Include the office location(s) where the design work was performed and whether the firm was the prime designer or a subconsultant. The WorkHistory Form shall include only one singular project. Projects with multiple phases, segments, elements, and/or contracts shall not be considered a single project. If a project listed includes multiple phases, segments, elements, and/or contracts, the SOQmay be rendered non-responsive. In any case, only the first phase, segment, element, and/or contract listed will be evaluated.

PROJECT NARRATIVE: Dewberry’s Fairfax, Virginia office completed the preliminary and final design for the Virginia Department of Transportation to complete the widening of I-66 between Manassas (Exit 47, Route 234 Business) and Gainesville (Exit 43, Route 29). Dewberry had a single design contract for the design of all elements of this project which was broken into five construction contracts based on funding availability. The project included the following elements:

• Widening of I-66 for over 4-miles from 4 to 8-lanes, including one HOV lane in each direction;• Ramp modifications at the Route 234 Business Interchange;• Ramp modifications at the Route 234 Bypass Interchange;• Complete reconstruction of the Route 29 Interchange in Gainesville; and• Traffic analysis and modeling for additional improvements in Gainesville to improve the

operation of I-66.

As part of preliminary design for the I-66/Route 29 Interchange, traffic analysis, projections and modeling indicated that a new interchange was necessary at the Route 29 intersection with Linton Hall Road along with the need to eliminate at-grade railroad crossings on Route 29 and Gallerher Road. Additionally, the scope included a new local road connection (University Boulevard) between Route 29 and Wellington Road, including a new overpass of I-66 and Norfolk Southern Railroad. Dewberry completed final engineering services for both the University Boulevard and I-66/Route 29/Linton Hall Road Interchange, each of which was completed as a stand-alone construction contract.

Due to funding constraints, construction plans were separated into five plan packages and construction phases. The widening of I-66 was separated into two plan sets and advertised in stages, and the Route 29/Linton Hall Road Interchange, including University Boulevard, was advertised in three construction packages. Dewberry worked with VDOT to identify appropriate packaged elements so that phased improvements and added capacity could be completed as quickly as possible.

PROJECT SCOPE: • Field surveys• Geotechnical Investigations• Environmental permit plate preparation• Traffic and operational analysis and documentation (IJR)• Roadway design, including more than 4 miles of interstate widening• Structural design, including ten new interstate and interchange bridges• Traffic management system (TMS) design• TMP and complex temporary traffic control plan design• Lighting and electrical design and traffic signal design• Public meeting preparation, attendance, and support• Coordination with Norfolk Southern Railroad

DEWBERRY'S ROLE: As the Engineer of Record for the improvements, Dewberry was responsible for all services outlined in the “Project Scope” as well as coordination with sub-consultants and VDOT.

In addition to providing all design services, Dewberry prepared presentations and graphics for multiple public hearings, public meetings, and citizen outreach meetings, provided support to VDOT right-of-way acquisition and negotiation staff during acquisition of right-of-way and easements, and coordinated with Norfolk Southern Railroad for the retaining wall and drainage improvements to avoid impacts to the railroad property. During construction, Dewberry’s involvement continued by providing support through shop drawing reviews, responding to RFI’s, attending monthly coordination meetings and detail-specific construction meetings, and participated in formal partnering meetings and workshops.

Similar to the I-95 Safety Improvements at Route 3, ramps at three interchanges on I-66 were modified or reconfigured to improve traffic operations and reduce congestion. Modifications were completed through development of phased temporary traffic control plans so that service was maintained at all times during construction. Signalized intersections on Route 29 and Route 234 were each modified to reflect the changes in lane configurations and the addition of turning or thru lanes, and signal timings were adjusted to reflect the geometric changes and accommodate current traffic volumes and future projections.

VERIFIABLE EVIDENCE OF GOOD PERFORMANCE: 1. Dewberry was awarded the 2015-2016 ACEC of Metropolitan Washington

Engineering Excellence Merit Award in Design for Phase IV of the project.2. Advertisements for each Phase of the project were delivered on-time with

successful construction bids received below the Engineer’s estimate.3. During construction, it became apparent that conditions of several bridges

which were intended to be minimally rehabilitated (deck overlays andwidenings) had deteriorated to the point that more significant improvementswere required. Dewberry was issued a contract modification to completedesigns for the complete reconstruction of the bridge decks (includingstructural steel) and replacement of all bridge piers. Plans were developedduring construction and coordinated with the Shirley Team ensuringconstruction schedules were not impacted. Plans were issued as aconstruction revision, and reconstruction was able to be completed withoutdelaying the project schedule.

SIMILARITIES TO I-95 SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS AT ROUTE 3

• Field Survey and Base Mapping• Environmental Permitting• Roadway Design• Interchange Modification & Ramp Improvements• Hydraulic Design• Traffic Engineering Design• Utility Relocation Design• Public Involvement/Communication• Quality Assurance/Quality Control• Worked with Lead Contractor - Shirley

Relevant Experience from this Project Includes:• Construction value over $10M for roadway work• At-grade improvements at interchanges• Signal and intersection improvements

23





a. Project Name & Location b. Name of the prime/ generalcontractor responsible for overallconstruction of the project.

c. Contact information of the Client and theirProject Manager who can verify Firm’sresponsibilities.


e. ConstructionContractCompletionDate (Actual orEstimated)




Name: Route 7 Westbound Truck Climbing Lane Design-Build

Location: Loudoun County, Virginia

Name: Shirley Contracting Company, LLC

Name of Client: Virginia Department of Transportation Project Manager: Sanjeev Suri, PE, PMP Phone: 703-259-2232 Email: [email protected]

11/2013 12/ 2015 $27,984 $28,780*

* Difference Due toOwner Added Scope

$1,984


PROJECT NARRATIVE:In 2013, the Shirley-Dewberry design-build Team was awarded the contract to construct a truck climbing lane along westbound Route 7 between the West Market Street Interchange and the Route 9 Interchange. In addition to the truck climbing lane, median access and intersection locations were modified or closed in order to improve the safety of the corridor, and new local roads were completed adjacent to Route 7 to maintain access to local communities and residential properties. The existing West Market Street Interchange was modified to accommodate new turning movements, and the Route 9 Interchange was reconfigured to eliminate stop-controlled interchange ramp intersections and replace them with single-and multi-lane roundabouts.

To further improve safety and operations at the Route 9 Interchange, the Washington and Old Dominion (W&OD) Regional Trail was reconfigured to eliminate at-grade, unsignalized crossings and incorporate a free-flow grade separated facility which now passes beneath Route 9 and an interchange ramp. To provide this new trail alignment, a new single-span arch structure was completed beneath one of the interchange ramps, and architectural treatments and landscaping were incorporated to mimic adjacent trail features and structural elements.

PROJECT SCOPE: • Field surveys• Environmental permitting, wetland delineations, and permit monitoring• Roadway design• Roundabout design and analysis• Structural design including bridge modifications and retaining walls• Hydraulic design and stormwater management• Temporary traffic control and transportation management plan development• Lighting and electrical design• Landscape design• Public meeting preparation, attendance, and support

DEWBERRY'S ROLE:As the Lead Designer, Dewberry’s Fairfax, Virginia office was responsible for completion of all engineering services required by the scope of the project. Additional services completed by Dewberry’s Fairfax office included field surveys and all environmental permitting and documentation. Dewberry also oversaw sub-consultant services to complete updated project aerial mapping, utility designations and test pits, geotechnical investigations, and pipe condition inspections and analysis.

During construction, Dewberry continued to attend public outreach meetings with the local community and regular progress meetings with VDOT and Loudoun County. Dewberry also reviewed all construction submittals, responded to construction RFIs, and completed permit monitoring as required by the environmental permits.

Similar to the I-95 Safety Improvements at Route 3 project, the Route 7 Truck Climbing Lane project included reconfiguration of the Route 7/Route 9 Interchange to improve capacity, and at-grade intersections on Route 7 were eliminated or reconfigured to address safety concerns. Modifications to the interchange ramps at the Route 9 interchange were completed as part of the reconfiguration of the interchange to incorporate roundabouts at each of the ramp terminals on Route 9. During design, Dewberry worked with VDOT to complete additional analysis of the roundabouts, and developed alternate concepts for both single lane and two-lane operations. Original contract requirements were to open the roundabouts in a single lane configuration, but construct the facilities to accommodate future 2-lane roundabout operation in the event that traffic volumes required the added capacity. Based on continued public outreach and additional analysis of the roundabouts, our Team and VDOT recognized the need to immediately open the roundabouts to 2-lane operations. Dewberry worked to update the plans for the 2-lane configuration, which was completed without delay to the project or additional impacts to the traveling public.

VERIFIABLE EVIDENCE OF GOOD PERFORMANCE: 1. The project was completed on-time, including additional scope elements to provide

additional landscaping adjacent to private properties along Route 7 and modify theroundabouts to provide 2-lane operations.


• Design-Build Delivery• Field Survey and Base Mapping• Environmental Permitting• Geotechnical Investigations• Roadway Design• Hydraulic Design• Traffic Engineering Design• Multi-Stages of TTC• Utility Relocation Design• Public Involvement/Communication• Quality Assurance/Quality Control• Worked with Lead Contractor - Shirley

Relevant Experience from this Project Includes:• Construction value over $10M for roadway work• At-grade improvements at interchanges• At-grade intersection improvements

24





a. Project Name & Location b. Name of the prime/ general contractorresponsible for overall construction of theproject.

c. Contact information of the Client andtheir Project Manager who can verifyFirm’s responsibilities.


e. ConstructionContractCompletion Date(Actual orEstimated)




Name: Route 50 Widening

Location: Fairfax and Loudoun Counties, Virginia

Name: Shirley Contracting Company LLC Name of Client: Virginia Department of Transportation Project Manager: Susan Shaw, PE Phone: 703-259-1995 Email: [email protected]

3/2011 (Design-Build

Contract Execution)

12/2015*


$67,830 77,337*


$4,127


PROJECT NARRATIVE:In 2011, the Design-Build Team of Shirley Contracting and Dewberry was awarded the contract for the widening of Route 50 from 4 to 6-lanes between Poland Road and Route 28, a distance of approximately 5-miles. Dewberry’s Fairfax, Virginia office was responsible for all final design of the project. In addition to widening the road to provide increased capacity, the existing pavement was completely reconstructed and a new roadway alignment was developed to maintain a 50’ median throughout the corridor. Local access points were consolidated and modified, and 8 signalized intersections were either modified or added as part of the Project.

During design, Dewberry worked with VDOT and adjacent property owners to incorporate additional improvements to avoid future reconstruction and impacts to the traveling public. Improvements added to the project included additional turn lanes and auxiliary lanes on Route 50, Avion Parkway, and Stonecroft Boulevard, and a new ramp connection from southbound Route 28 to southbound Lee Road via a new signalized intersection on westbound Route 50.

PROJECT SCOPE: • Field surveys• Environmental surveys, coordination and permitting• Roadway design• Structural design for Route 50 bridge over Cub Run• Structural design for multiple retaining walls• Hydraulic and stormwater management design• Maintenance of Traffic Plan development for seven stages of construction• Traffic signal design and corridor timing development• Right-of-way and utility easement plan development• Sanitary sewer and water main relocation design• Public meeting involvement

DEWBERRY'S ROLE:Dewberry served as the Lead Designer for the Shirley design-build Team and was responsible for all of the items listed in the “project scope” section. In addition to all engineering design, Dewberry also oversaw all design sub-consultant services including aerial mapping, utility designations and test pits, geotechnical investigations and recommendations, and traffic data collection.

At the outset of design, our Team developed an alternate sequence of construction concept which allowed construction to start within existing right-of-way and before utilities were relocated. This allowed construction to begin approximately 12 months in advance of the originally anticipated construction start date. In order to implement this accelerated construction start, Dewberry developed an advance construction plan package which included only the first two stages of construction. This allowed temporary pavement and bridge construction to begin ahead of final plans being approved, and allowed work to be completed on a parallel path with right-of-way acquisitions and utility relocations. Additional details of other design scope of work completed by Dewberry include:

• Five miles of 36” water main relocation design• Layout of all utility easements and utility relocations, which were then detailed by

individual utility companies (power, communication, and gas) for construction• Development and approval of final right-of-way plans• Development of new/updated traffic signal timings after construction due to additional

and unexpected growth west of the project in Loudoun County• Detailed maintenance of traffic plans• Modifications to the Route 28 Interchange to provide signalized access and

channelized turn lanes from southbound Route 28 to southbound Lee Road viawestbound Route 50.

While the original roadway was only 2-lanes in each direction, the rapid development of residential communities in western Loudoun County required the Temporary Traffic Control (TTC) plans to be revised during construction to accelerate the opening of a third lane for the eastern half of the project. Working with VDOT and Shirley, Dewberry developed new TTC plans which minimized the amount of additional temporary paving required while ensuring a third lane could be maintained during the remainder of the project.

VERIFIABLE EVIDENCE OF GOOD PERFORMANCE: 1. The project was completed on-time, including the additional scope which was added

to the contract to provide improved traffic flow at the Lee Road intersection.


• Design-Build Delivery• Field Survey and Base Mapping• Environmental Permitting• Geotechnical Investigations• Roadway Design• Hydraulic Design• Traffic Engineering Design• Signalized Intersection Design & Corridor Timing• Utility Relocation Design• Public Involvement/Communication• Quality Assurance/Quality Control• Worked with Lead Contractor - Shirley

Relevant Experience from this Project Includes:• Construction value over $10M for roadway work• At-grade improvements at an interchange• Signal and intersection improvements

25

4.2.7 - Conceptual Roadway Plans

4.2.7 - Conceptual Roadway Plans

DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION

OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC

MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED

NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT

TYPICAL SECTIONS2A(1)

2A(1)

LB

12'12'2'

SHOULDER

or GS-11SE RATE

AUX. LANE

2% OR SE

1'

B

SHOULDER

8'4'2'

A B C D

3'

L

PGS-11

6'

2'

2% OR SE

2:1 M

AX

GS-11

A B C D

P

U

LEGEND

B

A

D

H

Profile Grade LineP

U Underdrain, St'd. UD-4

M

CCurb, St'd. CG-3

6" Asphalt Concrete, Type BM-25.0A

Asphalt Concrete, Type SM-12.5A @ 220 lbs/sy

Asphalt Concrete, Type IM-19.0D @ 220 lbs/sy

LANE

AUX. /THRU

THRU LANE

EXIST.

THRU LANE

EXIST.

SHOULDER

EXIST.

LB

12' 2'

SHOULDER

2% OR SE

1'

ABCD

P

U

THRU LANE

EXIST.

THRU LANE

EXIST.

SHOULDER

EXIST.

THRU LANE

EXIST.

AUX. LANE

EXIST. AUX. LANE

G

G Guardrail, St'd. GR-2

VAR. 0'-12'

VAR. 0'-12' VAR. 0'-12'

GS-11

V Variable Depth Overlay/Build-up

J

K Solid Concrete Raised Median Strip, St'd. MS-1A

R Retaining Wall

U1

Underdrain, St'd. UD-2

M

12'

B

SHOULDER

8'4'2'

A B C D

3'

L

PGS-11

6'

2'

2% OR SE

2:1 MAX

GS-11

G

12' 12' VAR. 0'-12'

4: 1 4: 1

4: 1 4: 1 4: 1

VAR. 0'-12' 12'

B

SHOULDER

8'4'

A B C D

L

P

GS-11

2'

2% OR SE GS-114: 1

18'

1' 1'

J

with Flexible Post Delineators

Solid Concrete Raised Median Strip, St'd. MS-1 1

Solid Concrete Raised Median Strip, St'd. MS-1

J

3' 6'

2:1 M

AX

G

2'

A Asphalt Concrete, Type SM-12.5E @ 220 lbs/sy1

C 8" Asphalt Concrete, Type BM-25.0A1

Connected to a Standard UD-4 Edge Drain

8" Aggregate Base Material, Type I, Size No. 21B

D1

to be Extended and Daylighted


Mill Existing Pavement, 2"

A1

A1

4: 1

1

1

D2

Matching Bottom of Exist. Aggregate Base Material

Min. 8" Aggregate Base Material, Type I, Size No. 21B

1AA

1 U A1

A

M

D1

11A A

GS-11

Q Point of Rotation

W Concrete Median Barrier, St'd. MB-8A

W UU

RAMP B DECELERATION LANES

I-95 SOUTHBOUND

RAMP A

I-95 RAMPS

RAMP B

I-95 RAMPS

LOOP RAMP B

I-95 RAMPS

RAMP A ACCELERATION LANES

I-95 NORTHBOUND

U

PROJECT MANAGER

SURVEYED BY, DATE

DESIGN BY

SUBSURFACE UTILITY BY, DATE

STATEREVISED

ROUTE PROJECT

STATESHEET NO.

SHEET NO.PROJECT

0659-053-262

VA.RW-201, C-5010095-111-27895

Accumark, 3/18/16

Dewberry Consultants, LLC - (703) 289-4796

RICE & Associates

26

DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION

OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC

MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED

NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT

TYPICAL SECTIONS

2A(2)

BL

P

THRU LANE

EXIST.

THRU LANE

EXIST.

THRU LANE

EXIST.

4'0'-12'

TURN LANE

A B C D

2% OR SE

1'

2%2:1 MAX.

1'

1' 1'

TURN LANE

A B C D

THRU LANE

EXIST.

THRU LANE

EXIST.

THRU LANE

EXIST.

8'

SHOULDER

EXIST.

2'20' 20''

THRU LANE

EXIST.

TURN LANE

1'

2' BUFFERBL

TURN LANE

2% OR SE2% OR SE

TURN LANE

VAR. 4'-12'

2'

MATCH EXIST.

WIDENING

VAR. WIDTH

8' 2'12'

THRU LANE

GS-11

SHOULDER

5'

2:1 MAX

1'

WIDENING

VAR. WIDTH

MATCH EXIST. MATCH EXIST.

6'

BL

THRU LANE

EXIST.

THRU LANE

EXIST.

THRU LANE

EXIST.

AUX. LANE

EXIST.

8'

SHOULDER

EXIST.

2' VAR. 0'-12' VAR. 0'-12' VAR. 0'-12' VAR. 11'-12' VAR. 11'-12'

THRU LANE THRU LANE

AUX. LANE

EXIST.

8'2'

AUX. LANETURN LANE

0'-11'

SHOULDER

GS-11

1'

WIDENING

VAR. WIDTH

MATCH EXIST.

11'

AUX. LANETURN LANE

1'

WIDENING

VAR. WIDTH

MATCH EXIST.

MATCH EXIST.

11'11'

1'

5'

2'

TURN LANE

12'

2% OR SE

8'2'

SHOULDER

2%

LEGEND

B

A

D

H

Profile Grade LineP

U Underdrain, St'd. UD-4

M

CCurb, St'd. CG-3

6" Asphalt Concrete, Type BM-25.0A

Asphalt Concrete, Type SM-12.5A @ 220 lbs/sy

Asphalt Concrete, Type IM-19.0D @ 220 lbs/syG Guardrail, St'd. GR-2

VAR. 0'-12' VAR. 11'-12' VAR. 11'-12' VAR. 11'-12'

MATCH EXIST.

VAR. 11'-12' VAR. 11'-12' VAR. 11'-12' VAR. 11'-12' VAR. 11'-12' VAR. 11'-12' VAR. 11'-12' VAR. 0'-12'

A B C D

M

V Variable Depth Overlay/Build-up

V

J

K Solid Concrete Raised Median Strip, St'd. MS-1A

A B C DJ

R Retaining Wall

R U

M A M

MM

K A B C D

G

U

U1

Underdrain, St'd. UD-2

U H

4: 1

4: 1

J

with Flexible Post Delineators

Solid Concrete Raised Median Strip, St'd. MS-1 1

Solid Concrete Raised Median Strip, St'd. MS-1

1

B

SHOULDER

A B C

L

P

2'

2% OR SE GS-114: 1

1' 1'

VAR. 0'-16'4'2'

GS-11

4: 1

B

A B C D

L

P

2% OR SE

1'

J

2% OR SE

8' 2'

SHOULDER

2%

RU

VAR. 12'-16'1'-4'

VAR.

1

VAR.

A Asphalt Concrete, Type SM-12.5E @ 220 lbs/sy1

C 8" Asphalt Concrete, Type BM-25.0A1

Connected to a Standard UD-4 Edge Drain


D1

to be Extended and Daylighted


Mill Existing Pavement, 2"

A1

A1

A1

1

1

1

12

D2

Matching Bottom of Exist. Aggregate Base Material

Min. 8" Aggregate Base Material, Type I, Size No. 21B

11A

D1 1

AA MD1

A1

P Q

Q Point of Rotation

1

2A(2)

G

ROUTE 3

ROUTE 3

W Concrete Median Barrier, St'd. MB-8A

SLIP RAMP B

I-95 RAMPS

SLIP RAMP B

I-95 RAMPS

2:1 MAX

G

SHOULDER

2'

8'

8' 5'

2'

PROJECT MANAGER

SURVEYED BY, DATE

DESIGN BY


STATEREVISED

ROUTE PROJECT

STATESHEET NO.

SHEET NO.PROJECT

0659-053-262

VA.RW-201, C-5010095-111-27895

Accumark, 3/18/16


RICE & Associates

27

T

TC

TC

TV

TT

880013B

T

F

TV

T164 10 C3 6474

Vzn

T

880013A

TC

8800

13C

TC

F

(no #)

Vzn

(Empty Con

duit - VZ

N)

(COX)

(COX)

(PE

G)

Not On Records

(VZN)

(VZN)

(Irr.)

(Irr.)

(Irr.)

(Irr.)

(VZ

N)

#QD77

#109Ductile Iron

Ductile Iron

PVC

PV

C

#110

Per GIS (#112

Inaccessible

)

#112

#111 A

B

8" P

VC

Ductile Iron

Ductile Iron

S

S

S

S

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

#206

#205

#203

#204

#202

#201

#228

#230

#207

#200

15" RCP

15" R

CP

15" R

CP

18" RCP

24" RCP

24" RCP

24" RCP

15" R

CP

#21418" RCP

#229

18" CMP

18" RCP

15" CMP

18" R

CP

D

A

A

B

B

C

Underdrain

D

D

D

D

D

18" RCP

15" RCP

18" R

CP

18" RCP 24" RCP

24" CMP

24" C

MP

15" RCP

A

In. Pl. C

onc. DI

Rim

= 239.12

In. Pl. C

onc. DI

Rim

= 239.6

4

In. Pl. 15"

RCP

B

C

Inv. In=

234.6

0In

v. O

ut= 2

33.0

9

In. Pl. 15"

CM

PIn

v. In=

233.0

7In

v. O

ut= 2

31.54

D

E

In. Pl. 18"

RCP

Inv. In=

230.7

1In

v. O

ut= 2

23.8

0

F

Rim

= 236.10

In. Pl. M

etal

Grate

In. Pl. 2

4"

CM

PIn

v. In=

224.2

0In

v. O

ut= 2

06.2

5

In. Pl. 2

4"

CM

PIn

v. In=

231.98

Inv. O

ut= 2

23.6

6

FEDCBA

G

G

H

H

J

K

LM

N

Rim

= 240.2

6

In. Pl. M

etal

Grate

Rim

= 240.3

0

In. Pl. M

etal

Grate

In. Pl. S

SM

HRim

= 240.3

8

In. Pl. 18"

RCP

Inv. In=

232.6

1

In. Pl. 2

4"

RCP

Inv. In=

236.0

8In

v. O

ut= 2

32.7

4

Inv. In=

239.11

Inv. O

ut= 2

32.15

In. Pl. 18"

RCP

Inv. In=

236.12

Inv. O

ut= 2

32.8

3

O

(Surcharged)

In. Pl. 18"

RCP

with F

ES

J KM

Inv. O

ut= 2

32.14

LN

P

Q

S

O P

In. Pl. C

onc. DI

Rim

= 241.83

In. Pl. C

onc. DI

Rim

= 245.3

6

In. Pl. 15"

RCP

Inv. In=

240.13

Inv. O

ut= 2

36.0

0

Q

R

R S

(S 72°0

6'19" W 94.34'

)

47.58')

(S 87°47'22" W

(N 21°39'4

7"

W 19

5.0

0')

(N 78°26'56"

E 177.17')

(N 78°26'56"

E 315.65')

(S 78°26'56"

W 173.23')

L= 80.44')

(R= 50.00'

L= 76.64')

(R= 50.00')

L= 61.43')

(R= 13

5.00')

L= 6

8.10')

(R= 13

5.0

0')

L= 10.55')

(R= 2830.42')

(L= 63.52')(R= 2830.42')

(N 09°2

2'2

4"

W 89.0

3')

85.3

6')

(S 30°3

9'3

1" E

(S 86°43'23" W 377.75')

(N 05°0

1'16" E 13

5.9

5')

(S 85°51'07" E

5.18')

90.0

1')(S 09°5

1'04" E

(S 85°57'28" E 119.79')

52.13')

(N 29°15'5

6" E

(S 05°2

2'3

1" W 14

9.8

6')

(S 83°07'47" E 99.84')

(N 82°11'29" W 99.84')

(N 04°2

6'13" E 14

9.8

6')

100.16')

(S 82°34'38" E

(N 05°14'3

5" E 14

9.2

0')

DB 199 PG 340

Ex. 30' Ingress/Egress Esmt.

DB 248 P

G 457

Ex. 20' In

gress/

Egress Es

mt.

(Approximate Location)

DB 197 PG 135

Ex. VEPCO Esmt.

(S 78°26'56"

W182.55

')

L= 47.34')(R= 26

8.22'

24.94')

(N 68°

20'13"

E

31.50')(N

68°20'

13" E

81.18')

(N 21°39'4

7"

W

97.12')

(N 18°4

6'3

7"

W82.2

6')

(S 21°39'4

7" E

77.0

4')

(N 21°39'4

7"

W

(N 21°39'4

7"

W 233.4

6')

PB 7 P

G 54

Ex. 2

0' S

anita

ry Sewer Es

mt

PB 9 P

G 33

Ex. W

aterlin

e Esmt.

Ex. 15' In

gress/

Egress Es

mt. PB

9 PG 3

3

PB 7 P

G 54

Ex. W

aterlin

e Esmt.

PB 9 PG 33Ex. 20

' Waterline Es

mt.

PB 7 PG 54

Sewer Esmt.

Ex. 20' Sanita

ry

78.32')

(N 5

9°20'2

9" E

(S 09°2

2'2

4" E 203.2

5')

61.77')(S 78°

38'18" W

9.45')(S

72°06'19

" W

L=

66.3

1')

(R=

90.0

0'

66.9

2')

(S 09°2

2'2

4" E

PB 9 P

G 13

0

Ex. 20' Sanitary Sewer Es

mt.

PB 9 P

G 20

Ex. 20' Sa

nitary

Sewer

Esmt.

(N 03°16'3

7"

W 336.2

8')

(S 03°16'3

7" E 317.0

9')

135.12')

(N 86°43'23" E

60.8

8')

(S 11°3

3'0

4" E

80.3

5')

(S 03°16'3

7" E

48.60')

(N 86°43'23" E

22.18')

(S 03°16'3

7" E

24.03')

(S 87°28'49" E

36.04')

(N 86°43'23" E

54.7

3')

(S 03°16'3

7" E

23.5

0')

(S 05°3

9'3

0"

W

28.5

0')

(S 03°16'3

7" E

PB 8 PG 27Ex. Sa

nitary Sewer

Esmt.Ex. 15'

Sanitary Sew

er Esmt. PB 8 P

G 53

PB 8 PG 27Ex. Wa

terline Esmt.

(S 86°43'23" W 132.00')

DB 290 PG 659

Ex. Bell Atlantic Esmt.

(Approx. L

ocation)

DB 276 P

G 12

4Ex. 15'

Vir

ginia Power Es

mt.

(Approx. L

ocation)

DB 290 P

G 700

Ex. 15'

Vir

ginia Power Es

mt.

PB 9 P

G 33

Ex. 24' In

gress/

Egress Es

mt.

PB 9 PG 3

3

Ex. 24' Ing

ress/E

gress

Esmt.

PB 9 PG 33Ex. 15'

Ingress/Egr

ess Esmt.PB 9 P

G 130Ex. 15' Ingres

s/Egress Es

mt.

PB 8 PG 27& Stor

m Sewer Eas

ementEx. 50

' Ingress/Eg

ress Esmt.

PB 9 P

G 10

3

Ex. 24' In

gress/

Egress Es

mt.

PB 9 P

G 10

3

Ex. 12' In

gress/

Egress Es

mt.

PB 8 P

G 69

Ex. 12' In

gress/

Egress Es

mt.

Ir

Ir

Ir

Ir

Ir Ir Ir

Ip

Ir

Ir

RW

Mon.

RW

Mon.

Ir Ir

Ir Ir

Ir

RW

Mon.

Ir

(N 06°4

9'2

8" E 277.7

8')

(N 25°51'56"

W 18

2.72')

18.94')(S 89°

53'21" W

(S 88°12'23" W 142.39')

18.38')

(S 36°58'2

9" E

155.66')

(N 64°21'06

" E

PB 5 P

G 22

Ex. 30' In

gress/

Egress Es

mt.

(S 06°4

9'2

8"

W)

Existing VDOT Limited Access R/W per Plans 0095-089-101

PB 9 P

G 40-4

7Varia

ble

Width R/

WCarl

D. Silver Parkway

Existing VDOT R/W per Plans 0095-089-101

per Plans 00

95-089-101Existin

g VDOT R/W

DB 316 PG 723

DB 288 PG 536

for Public Use

City of Fredericksburg

Dedicated to the

Commerce Street

N 03°0

5'3

4"

W

S 03°0

5'3

4" E

S 11°2

2'0

1" E

N 59°31'3

2" E

S 30°2

8'2

8" E

N 21°26'4

7"

W

N 21°26'4

7"

W

S 01°46'18" E

N 01°54'17"

W

N 04°3

6'3

1" W

N 02°0

7'3

6"

W

N 36°58'19"

W

N 89°20'21" W

N 85°27'26" E

S 04°16'5

4" E

N 89°24'21" W (N 83°11'47" W 105.32')

(S 82°15'29" E 105.32')

N 68°

33'13" E

(S 68°

20'13"

W 109.17')

PB 5 PG 22Ex. 20

' Ingress/Egr

ess Esmt.

Ir



Ir

End Limited Access

End Limited AccessLimited Access Line per Plans 0095-089-101

E

T

T

T

T

T

T

E

T

A

B

CENTRAL PARK 1218, LLCInst.# 050001917PB 11 PG 90-91

1.755 AC.GPIN# 7769-62-4664

CENTRAL PARK 1223, LLCInst.# 050001919PB 11 PG 90-91

1.434 AC.GPIN# 7769-62-7720

D

CENTRAL PARK 1200, LLCInst.# 050001909

PB 8 PG 69-70

GPIN# 7769-72-0750

FREDERICKSBURG 35, LLCInst.# 020003407PB 9 PG 102-103

0.990 AC.GPIN# 7769-62-9730

PB 10 PG 159

GPIN# 7769-6

2-9857

CARL D. SILVER, ESTATE

PB 8 PG 27-3

1

2.32 AC. (Per

GIS)

Inst.# 060003016

GPIN# 7769-62-5175

DEVELOPMENT, LLC

FREDERICKSBURG

0.3430 AC.

PB 7 PG 54

0.643 AC.

GPIN# 7769-62-0541

FREDERICKSBURG 35, LLCInst.# 020003400

PB 9 PG 33

0.932 AC.

GPIN# 7769-62-1652

C

D

DB 300 PG 489

0.111 AC.

GPIN# 7769-62-4532

OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.THE CENTRAL PARK PROPERTY

Inst.# 150003110

PB 9 PG 130-132

1.396 AC.

GPIN# 7769-62-0862

OWNER ONE, LLCMACH II MCB SILVER PORTFOLIO

Inst.# 060003016

9.8445 AC.GPIN# 7769-71-1827

FREDERICKSBURG DEVELOPMENT, LLC

Inst.# 150000201

2.4231 AC.GPIN# 7769-61-6928

PB 14 PG 72

FREDERICKSBURG DEVELOPMENT, LLCInst.# 060003016

GPIN# 7769-62-5175

DEVELOPMENT, LLC

FREDERICKSBURG

0.3430 AC.

RICHARD A. PRUITTInst.# 030004267

.5063 AC.GPIN# 7769-62-4137

PB 5 PG 22PB 12 PG 43A

Inst.# 030004264PB 12 PG 43A

1.0815 AC. (Per GIS)GPIN# 7769-62-2163

RICHARD A. PRUITT

Inst.# 030004264

0.57 AC. (Per GIS)GPIN# 7769-62-1142

RICHARD A. PRUITT

PB 12 PG 43A

Denotes Construction Limits in Cuts

Denotes Construction Limits in Fills

VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

REVISEDSTATE

STATE

ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.

PROJECT SHEET NO.

PROJECT MANAGER

SURVEYED BY, DATE

DESIGN BY


VA.

0

SCALE

50' 100'

3

Denotes Full Depth Pavement

Denotes Existing Pavement

Denotes Milling and Overlay/Build-Up

Denotes Proposed Shoulder

Denotes Existing Bridge

0095-111-278

RW-201, C-501

0095-111-278


RICE & Associates

Accumark, 3/18/16

or Obscuring of Roadway

Denotes Demolition of Pavement

ST'D. RW-3

RETAINING WALL

ROUTE 3 EB

ROUTE 3 WB

INSET A

MAT

CH

LIN

E - S

EE IN

SE

T

A

MAT

CH

LIN

E - S

EE

AB

OVE

3

3

CA

RL

D. SIL

VE

R

PA

RK

WA

Y

ROUTE 3

EB

ROUTE 3

WB

ROUTE 3

BL

ROUTE 3 BL

MA

TC

H

LIN

E -

ST

A. 36+5

0 -

SE

E

SH

EE

T 4

19

20

21

PC S

TA 19

+72.2

5

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

9 30

31

32

33

34

35

36

PT STA 30+91.47

308

309

310

PC S

TA 308+6

7.5

2

PT STA 310+45.99

28

E

E

E

E

F

E

E

TT

EB

WM

#SE9

OH

Sig

n #880023

OH Sign #880015

OH Sign

OH Sign

S#100

PVC

PVC

PVC

#101

PVC

#102PVC

S

S

SNOW

#223

#222

18" RCP

In. Pl. M

etal

Grate

In. Pl. 2

4"

CM

P

Inv. In=

239.6

0

Inv. O

ut= 2

39.17

Conc. E

nd

wall

Top=

242.0

0

Rim

= 241.48

24" C

MP

L= 212.76')

(R= 497.96'

L= 358.19')

(R= 497.96'

(S 03°16'3

7" E 13

8.0

0')

(S 03°16'3

7" E 217.2

4')

(S 86°43'23" W 120.00')

10.33')

(N 86°43'23" E

10.03')

(S 86°43'23" W

(S 5

9°35'59" W 119.

07')

47.13')

(S 45°16'29" W

(S 33°42'16"

W 332.70')

(S 5

6°17'44" E 150.81')

(N 03°16'3

7"

W 316.3

6')

(S 45°16'29" W

63.60')

(S 03°16'3

7" E 290.2

6')

DB 300 P

G 361

Ex. 15'

Vir

ginia Power Es

mt.

DB 300 P

G 361

Ex. 15' Virginia Pow

er E

smt.

DB 341 P

G 190

Gas Pipeline E

smt.

Ex. 15' Colum

bia Gas of Virginia

DB 341 P

G 190

Gas Pipeline

Esmt.

Ex. 15' Columbia Gas of Virginia

PB 11 P

G 17

Ex. 20' Sanitary S

ewer E

smt.

DB 284

PG 403

Ex. 15' V

irginia P

ower Esm

t.

PB 9 P

G 10

2

Ex. 24' In

gress/

Egress Es

mt.

PB 9 P

G 119

Ex. 24' In

gress/

Egress Es

mt.

Ir Ir

RW

Mon.

Ir

Ir

Ir

N 56°06'58" W

S 03°0

5'3

4" E

S 03°0

5'3

4" E

N 09°2

7'3

0" E

CENTRAL PARK 1200, LLCInst.# 050001909

PB 8 PG 69-70

1.002 AC.GPIN# 7769-72-0750

Inst.# 150003102

PB 11 PG 16-17

1.525 AC.GPIN# 7769-72-3980

OWNER ONE, LLC

MACH II MCB SILVER PORTFOLIO

CE

NT

RA

L P

AR

K 12

09, LLC

Inst.# 0500019

26

PB 9 P

G 118-119

1.093

AC.

GPIN

# 7769-7

2-2

713

CE

NT

RA

L P

AR

K 12

09, LLC

Inst.# 0500019

26

PB 9 P

G 118-119

1.093

AC.

GPIN

# 7769-7

2-2

713



VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

REVISEDSTATE

STATE


PROJECT SHEET NO.

PROJECT MANAGER

SURVEYED BY, DATE

DESIGN BY


VA.

0

SCALE

50' 100'

3






0095-111-278

RW-201, C-501

0095-111-278


RICE & Associates

Accumark, 3/18/16



MA

TC

H

LIN

E -

ST

A. 36+5

0 -

SE

E

SH

EE

T 3

ROUTE 3 EB

ROUTE 3 WB

ROUTE 3 BL

MA

TC

H

LIN

E -

ST

A. 51+50 -

SE

E

SH

EE

T 5

RA

MP

B

SLIP R

AMP B

LO

OP

B

I-95 S

B

I-95

NB

I-95 S

B

BL

I-95

NB

BL

RA

MP

B

BL

LO

OP

B

B L

SLIP

RA

MP

B

BL

MAT

CH LIN

E - S

TA. 2

19+50 - S

EE SHEET 7

MATCH LINE - STA. 99+00 - SEE SHEET 7


4

4

LOOP C

ST'D. RW-3

RETAINING WALL

I-95

I-95

94

95

96

97

98

99

POB STA 94+00.00

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

50

51

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

PC S

TA 10

+00.0

0

PC

C S

TA 11+2

0.3

7

PCC STA

13+38.1

8

PCC STA 15+89.82

300

301

302

303

304

305

306

307

POB STA 3

00+00.00

PC S

TA 3

03+75.72

PT

ST

A 306+5

4.7

0

93

94

95

96

97

98

99

220

221

222

223

224

225

PT STA 223+53.23

POE STA 225+48.28

29

T

E TC

T

E

T

T

T

TC

F

F

F

F

WM

TT

Na

EB

EBW

W

G

G

Storm Pumpstation

Storm Pumpstation

EB

DVP #

XD77

(SIG)

FO1

OH Sign

F

(SIG)

(SIG)

(SIG)

(CO

X)

(COX)

PVC

PV

C

#113

#114

Ductile Iron

Ductile IronDuctile Iron

6"

D. I.

S

S

PILES

SNOW

SNOW

SNOW

SN

OW

D

D

D

D

D

#212

#213

#211

#210

#20860" RCP

60" RCP

Unknown Siz

e

&

Type

#236

A

B

#209

#216 #217

36" R

CP

36" RCP

18" R

CP

#218#219

30" R

CP

30" R

CP

Unknown Size & Typ

e

(N 04°2

0'4

3"

W 222.17')

(N 04°2

0'4

3"

W 228.18')

(N 86°35'39" E 64.51')(N 86°35'39" E 93.30')

(N 04°2

0'4

3"

W 214.4

1')

L= 75.93')

(R= 310.00'

L= 2

10.82')

(R= 310.00'

(S 87°57'54" W 178.75')

(N 02°0

2'0

6"

W 112.7

1')

(N 87°57'54" E 194.01')

(S 01°54'0

3" E 254.4

7')

(N 01°55'15"

W 251.80')

(N 08°19'0

3" E 679.7

6')

(S 00°3

3'15" E 864.4

3')

(N 74°51'01" W 151.97')

(S 02°0

8'4

9" E

48.0

0')

(N 10°4

3'5

1" W 10

1.16')

(S 02°15'2

7" E 324.6

4')

DB 576 PG 321

Ex. 12' C&P Tele. Esmt.

PB 10 P

G 95

Ex. 20' Private Stor

m

Drain

age Es

mt.

RW

Mon.

Ir

Ir

RW

Mon.R

W

Mon.

Ramseur Street

Existing VD

OT R/

W per Plans 0095-0

89-101

N 04°19'18"

W

N 04°19'18"

W

S 00°4

0'2

3" E

S 01°37'5

8" E

S 02°14'0

6" E

N 06°0

2'5

8"

W

N 87°45'54" E

S 87°45'54" W

per Plans 0095-088-109

Existing VDOT R/W

(Approx. Location)

DB 18

5 P

G 15

3Ex. 40'

Access Es

mt.

DB 19

3

PG 15

5

Ex. 20'

Constr

uction Es

mt.

RW

Mon.

Ir

Limite

d Access Line per

Plans

0095-089-10

1

Limited Access Line per Plans 0095-089-101

End Limited Access


Suspected Location Limited Access Line per Plans 0095-089-101 (See Note #3)

(See Note #3)

End Limited Access

T

T

T

T

AREC 14, LLCInst.# 110002074

PB 10 PG 94-95

2.703 AC.

GPIN# 7769-92-3876

AREC 14, LLC,Inst.# 110002074

GPIN# 7769-93-3025

0.428 AC. (Measured)

AREC 14, LLCInst.# 110002074

PB 10 PG 94-95

2.703 AC.

GPIN# 7769-92-3876

AREC 14, LLC,Inst.# 110002074

GPIN# 7769-93-3025

0.428 AC. (Measured)

ESS PRISA III OWNER, LLCInst.# 050002951

3.00 AC.

GPIN# 7769-93-5150

PB 10 PG 94-95

ESS PRISA III OWNER LLC,Inst.# 050002951

3.546 AC.

GPIN# 7769-93-7122

DB 188 PG 443 (Plat)

DB 193 PG 153 (Plat)

Inst.# 080001550

LJS GATEWAY STORE, LLC

1.187 AC.

GPIN# 7769-92-7057

PB 10 PG 51

Inst.# 080001430

PROPERTIES II LLC

WALLACE

PB 10 PG 43-44

1.489 AC.

GPIN# 7769-92-6214

FIVE HANDS, LLCInst.# 150000915



VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

REVISEDSTATE

STATE


PROJECT SHEET NO.

PROJECT MANAGER

SURVEYED BY, DATE

DESIGN BY


VA.

0

SCALE

50' 100'

3






0095-111-278

RW-201, C-501

0095-111-278


RICE & Associates

Accumark, 3/18/16



67

PT

ST

A 67+6

9.17

MA

TC

H

LIN

E -

ST

A. 51+50 -

SE

E

SH

EE

T 4

MA

TC

H

LIN

E -

SE

E

AB

OVE

INSET A

ROUTE 3 BL

5

5

MATCH

LINE - S

TA. 15+5

0 - S

EE SHEET

8

ROUTE 3 BL

ROUTE 3 EB

ROUTE 3 WB

RA

MP

AR

AM

P

A

BL

MA

TC

H

LIN

E -

SE

E IN

SE

T

A

MATCH LINE - SEE SHEET 6

52

53

54

55

56

57

58

59

60

61

62

63

64

65

66

PC S

TA 61+53.7

1

11

12

13

14

15

POB STA 10+00.00

PC STA 10+59.93

PT STA 11+06.83

99

PC STA

12+07.3

8

PRC STA 13

+16.05

30

#238

24" R

CP

36" R

CP

24" RCP

#237

#240

#239

#242

#241

18"

RCP

36" R

CP

D

In. Pl. 3

6" RCP

In. Pl. F

ES

Inv. = 19

3. 09

In. Pl. S

SMH Rim= 2

09. 78 Inv.

In= 189. 66 (3

6" RCP)

Inv. In= 189. 90 (3

0" HDP)

Inv. Out

= 189. 5

4

In. Pl. 3

6" R

CP

In. Pl. 3

6"

RCP

In. Pl. 30

" Plastic Pipe

(S 88°02'34" W 269.97')

(S 04°3

0'4

8" E 338.6

5')

(N 04°3

0'4

8"

W 243.9

3')

(N 33°49'55" E 94.63')

DB 197 P

G 370

Ex. 50' Vepco / C

&P Telep

hone

Esmt.

RW Mon.

RW Mon.

RW

Mon.

RW

Mon.

Ir

PB 10 P

G 110-113

Variable Width R/W

Gate

way

Boulevar

d

Existing VD

OT Li

mited Access R/

W per Plans 0095-0

89-101

Existing VD

OT R/

W per Plans 0095-0

89-101

S 88°04'14" W

S 04°2

9'2

3" E

1.014 AC.

GPIN# 7769-92-2021

PB 10 PG 110-113

KAL, LLCInst.# 120002610

GPIN# 7769-92-3095

ENELA CORNER, LLC

HOME DEPOT U.S.A. INC

19.729 AC.

GPIN# 7769-91-0210

DB 331 PG 814

PB 10 PG 110

HOME DEPOT U.S.A. INC

19.729 AC.

GPIN# 7769-91-0210

DB 331 PG 814

PB 10 PG 110



VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

REVISEDSTATE

STATE


PROJECT SHEET NO.

PROJECT MANAGER

SURVEYED BY, DATE

DESIGN BY


VA.

0

SCALE

50' 100'

3






0095-111-278

RW-201, C-501

0095-111-278


RICE & Associates

Accumark, 3/18/16




MATCH LINE - SEE SHEET 5I-95 S

B

I-95

NB

I-95

NB

BL

LOOP D

RAM

P D

6

6

88

89

90

91

92

93

POB STA 87+50.00

31

54" R

CP

36" R

CP

48" R

CP

#225

18" R

CP

#226

#224

#227

#221

DB 286 PG 505

Ex. 15' Virginia Power Esmt.

(N 45°00'0

0"

W 832.13')

L= 304.28')

(R= 1145.67'

(S 45°00'0

0" E 15

8.2

5')

11.44')

(S 52°11'14" W

DB 286 P

G 699

Ex. 7' GTE

Esmt.

PB 8 P

G 31

Ex. 20'

Waterline Esmt.

PB 8 PG 5

Ex. 20' Waterline Esmt.

PB 8 PG 5

Ex. 20' Storm Sewer Esmt.

DB 287 PG 671

Ex. 15' Virginia Power Esmt.

PB 8 P

G 5

Ex. 20' Utility E

smt.

(N 45°00'0

0"

W 268.12')

(S 52°11'14" W 560.22')

L= 211.00')

(R= 953.62'

(S 45°00'0

0" E 917.19')

(S 14°55'04" W 235.00')

L= 377.02')

(R= 953.62'

L= 106.71')

(R= 953.62'

85.5

9')

(S 68°15'2

2" E

39.96')

(N 45°00'0

0"

W

40.03')

(S 45°05'0

6" E

(N 45°01'38" E 109.92')

47.98')

(S 44°5

5'4

6" E

(N 45°04'14" E 216.93')

(N 45°00'00" E 145.97')

PB 17 PG 148

Access Esmt.

Private Stormwater Management

PB 17 PG 148

Management Esmt.

Ex. Private Stormwater

PB 17 P

G 14

8

Management

Access Esmt.

Ex. 24' Private Storm

water

PB 17 PG 148

Management Access Esmt.

Ex. 24' Private Stormwater

PB 17 PG 148

Management Esmt.


PB 17 PG 148

Management Esmt.


PB 17 PG 148

Ex. 15' Waterline Esmt.

PB 17 P

G 148

Ex. 2

0' Private S

anitary Sew

er Esmt.

PB 17 PG 148

Ex. 10' Private Sanitary Sewer Esmt.

PB 8 P

G 5

Ex. 15'

Waterline Esmt.

PB 17 P

G 14

8

Ex. 15'

Waterline Esmt.

RW

Mon.

Ir

Ir

Ir

Ir


Existing VD

OT Limited Access R

/W per P

lans 0095-089-101

N 45°12'24" E

85.6

1')

(N 68°2

0'3

4"

W

S 44°49'14" E

S 44°49'14" E

N 44°49'14"

W

E

SANDPIPER FREDERICKSBURG LLCInst.# 130003228

PB 17 PG 148-149

1.686 AC.

GPIN# 7769-83-3867

LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, INC.

DB 282 PG 261

PB 8 PG 5

15.4659 AC.

GPIN# 7769-73-7735

1.096 AC.GPIN# 7769-73-5163

PB 10 PG 159-161

PB 11 PG 16-17

PB 10 P

G 15

9

GPIN

# 7769-6

2-9

857

CAR

L D. SIL

VE

R, EST

ATE

PB 8 P

G 27-3

1

2.3

2

AC. (Per GIS)

VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

REVISEDSTATE

STATE


PROJECT SHEET NO.

PROJECT MANAGER

SURVEYED BY, DATE

DESIGN BY


VA.

0

SCALE

50' 100'

3

0095-111-278

RW-201, C-501

0095-111-278


RICE & Associates

Accumark, 3/18/16

MAT

CH

LIN

E - S

TA. 219

+50 - S

EE

SH

EE

T 4

MA

TC

H

LIN

E - S

TA. 9

9+5

0 - S

EE

SH

EE

T 4

MA

TC

H

LIN

E - S

TA. 112

+50 - S

EE

SH

EE

T 9

RAMP B

RAMP B BL

I-95 SBI-95 SB BL

7

7






Denotes Existing BridgeDenotes Construction Limits in Fills




I-95

100

101

102

103

104

105

106

107

108

109

110

111

112

PO

B

ST

A 300+0

0.0

0

204

205

206207

208

209

210

211

212

213

214

215

216

217

218

219

PC STA 204+91.25

PT STA 211+57.63

PC STA 217+55.63

32

F

#235

54" R

CP

48" R

CP

42" R

CP

36" RCP

#234

#246

#245

#243

#258

#233

#231

#232

#259

(N 02°

02'06" W 111.08')

L= 32

5.03')

(R= 9

54.93'

(N 2

3°05'03

" W 66

4.25')

RW

Mon.

RW

Mon.

Existing

VDOT Li

mite

d Access R/

W per

Plans 0

095-08

9-101

HYLT

ON

VE

NT

UR

E

LLC,

Inst.# 060000272

75.5

3247

AC. (T

otal)

66.13

611 A

C.

GPIN

# 7769-9

4-7

825

HYLT

ON

VE

NT

UR

E

LLC,

Inst.# 060000272

75.5

3247

AC. (T

otal)

66.13

611 A

C.

GPIN

# 7769-9

4-7

825

HYLTON VENTURE LLC,Inst.# 060000272

GPIN# 7769-94-7825

75.53247 AC. (Total)

66.13611 AC.



VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

REVISEDSTATE

STATE


PROJECT SHEET NO.

PROJECT MANAGER

SURVEYED BY, DATE

DESIGN BY


VA.

0

SCALE

50' 100'

3






0095-111-278

RW-201, C-501

0095-111-278


RICE & Associates

Accumark, 3/18/16



I-95 NBI-95 NB BL

RAM

P A R

AMP A

BL

LOOP A


SE

E

SH

EE

T 4

MA

TC

H

LIN

E - S

TA. 9

9+0

0 -

MA

TC

H

LIN

E -

ST

A. 112

+00 -

SE

E

SH

EE

T 9

MATCH LIN

E - S

TA. 15

+50 - S

EE S

HEET 5

8

8

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25 26

PT ST

A 16

+89.81

PC STA 19+68.61

PT STA 25+80.46

99

100

101

102

103

104

105

106

107

108

109

110

111

112

33

F

55.9

9')

(N 76°19'3

2"

W

99.8

6')

(N 76°4

3'4

1" W

54.5

5')

(S 89°11'28"

W

32.6

2')

(S 85°4

4'4

4"

W

L= 717.90'')

(R= 5842.58'

45.0

1')

(S 88°2

9'5

0" E

57.10')

(N 84°5

5'3

4" E

77.6

0')

(N 87°5

6'4

3" E

RW Pin

RW Pin

RW Pin

RW Pin

RW Pin

RW Pin

RW Pin

Varia

ble

Width R/

WCowan Boule

vard

Existing VDOT Lim

ited Access R

/W per Plans

0095-089-10

1

F

E

E

F

E

(SIG)

(SIG)

OH

Sig

n

42" R

CP

42" R

CP

12" Iron

15" RCP

15" RCP

#249

#248

#247

#253#254

#252#250

#2609

(S 14°55'04" W 235.00') (S 14°55'04" W

50.25')

(N 75°0

4'5

6"

W 10

0.0

0')

(S 75°0

4'5

6" E 10

0.0

0')

15.00')

(S 14°55'04" W

100.0

0')

(N 75°0

4'5

6"

W

79.56')

(S 14°55'04" W

(N 45°00'00" E 334.39')

(S 14°55'04" W 561.29') L= 5.47')

(R= 5442.71'

(N 06°27'31"

E 154.07')

(N 20°56'17" E 149.75')

(N 15°04'22" E 204.07')

(N 11°06'17" E 250.11')

(N 13°51'19" E 700.22')

PB 11 PG 30

Ex. 20' Ingress/Egress Esmt.

RW

Mon.

RW

Mon.

RW

Mon.

RW

Mon.

RW

Mon.

IrIr

Existing VDOT Limited

Access R/W per Pla

ns 0095-088-109

Existing VDOT Limited Access R/W per Plans 0095-089-101 Existing VDOT Limited Access R/W per Plans 0095-088-109


S 74°5

4'0

8" E

S 74°5

4'0

8" E

HYLTON VENTURE LLC,

Inst.# 06000027

2

GPIN# 7769-94-

782575.5324

7 AC. (Total)66.13611

AC.

HYLTON VENTURE LLC,Inst.# 060000272

GPIN# 7769-94-7825

75.53247 AC. (Total)

66.13611 AC.



VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

REVISEDSTATE

STATE


PROJECT SHEET NO.

PROJECT MANAGER

SURVEYED BY, DATE

DESIGN BY


VA.

0

SCALE

50' 100'

3






0095-111-278

RW-201, C-501

0095-111-278


RICE & Associates

Accumark, 3/18/16



PIER PROTECTIO

N SYSTEM REQ'D

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

126 12

7 128 12

9

130

131

132

133

I-95

113

114

115

116

117

118

119

120

121

122

PC STA 122+18.22

35

36 37 38 39 40

PC STA 34+93.60

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

112

113

114

115

116

117

118

119

120

121

122

123

124 125 12

6

PC STA 121+37.70

201

202

203

204

POB STA 200+00.00

I-95 NBI-95 NB BL

MA

TC

H

LIN

E - S

TA. 112

+50 - S

EE

SH

EE

T 8

MA

TC

H

LIN

E - S

TA. 12

6+0

0 - S

EE

AB

OVE

MA

TC

H

LIN

E - S

TA. 12

6+0

0 - S

EE

BE

LO

W

ST

A. 112

+50 - S

EE

SH

EE

T 7

MA

TC

H

LIN

E -

9

9

I-95 SB

I-95 SB BL

I-95 NB

I-95 NB BL

ULTIMATE NB CD-ROAD BL

ULTIMATE NB CD-ROAD BLULTIMATE NB CD-ROAD

ULTIMATE NB CD-ROAD

MAT

CH

LIN

E - S

TA. 13

3+0

0 - S

EE

SH

EE

T 10

And Associated Improvements

Noise Barrier (Option 1)

34

F

F

E

E

#461

TC

Box (2)

F

#W

B74

(SIG)

(SIG)

(SIG)

Fall H

ill Avenue - R

te 639

Fall H

ill Avenue - R

te 639

(U

nder Constr

uctio

n)

Approxim

ate Locatio

n of New

Brid

ge

Activ

e Constr

uctio

n

Area

under constr

uctio

n in the sa

me general lo

catio

n.

This Brid

ge has been removed, a new brid

ge is currently

(S 25°3

2'28" E 147

.20')

(R = 280.00')

(A = 231.86')

LR070001847

Ex. 15' Public Waterline Easement DB 319 Pg. 185

Ex. 15' Storm Sewer Easement

(S 09°32'28" E 314.30')(S 07°57'28" E 63.90')

(N 84°0

6'2

8"

W 839.5

8')

N84°0

5'5

7"W

(S 84°0

6'2

8" E 86.5

8') R

W

Pin

(S 78°3

0'3

3"

W 10

1.35')

(N 78°3

0'3

3" E 10

1.35')

DB 300 Pg. 367

Ex. 20'

Utility Ease

ment

(N 06°10'49" W 240.1

9')

(S 06°10'49" E 240.19')

N78°4

1'13

"E

(S 85°0

5'0

0"

W 13

3.15')

(N 78°4

0'4

2" E 13

3.18')

(N 10°55'34" W 383.52')

(N 64°3

0'0

0" E 16

4.8

0')

(N 04°35'00" W 192.60')

PB 395 Pg 109Ex. VEPCO EasementApprox. Location

Inst. 150001983Ex. VEPCO Easement

Proj. U

000-111-2

33, R

201, C

501

Ex. T

emp. C

onst. E

smt.

BE

GIN

L/

A LIN

E


ir

(N 10°55'34" W 680.89')

PB 8 Pg. 23

Ex. 10' VEP

CO Easement

PB 8 Pg. 23Ex. 10' Utility Easement

(62.85')

Inst. #16

0000009

For VEP

CO

Ex.

VD

OT

Utility E

smt.

Begin L/

A Line

Ex.

R/

W

RW

Mon.

E

10

WEYMOUTH, L. L. C.Inst.# 010001353

0. 715 AC.

TAX MAP# 7769-98-1731

FRED II LIMITED PARTNERSHIPInst.# 030001034

1. 037 AC.

GPIN# 7769-98-1474


6. 000 AC.

GPIN# 7769-98-4384

THE PRESERVE AT SMITH RUN

HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATIONInst.# 120000712

0. 955 AC.

TAX MAP# 7769-98-2024


1. 037 AC.

GPIN# 7769-98-1474

F

(SIG)

F

(SIG)

Ductile Ir

on

#116

Ductile Ir

on

Ductile Ir

on

Ductile Ir

on

PVC

#117

6" D. I.

#118

PVC

S

S

S

S

S

#255

#256

6' x 8' B

ox Culvert

Preserve Lane

D

D

D

Inv.

Out

= 238. 3

5'

In Pl. 15"

Conc. Pip

e

Rim

= 245. 8

8'

In Pl. C

DI

Inv.

Out

= 236. 8

0'

In Pl. 15"

Conc. Pip

e

Inv. In =

237. 0

9'

Rim

= 244. 0

7'

In Pl. C

DI

Inv.

Out

= 206. 0

8'

In Pl. 4

8"

Conc. Pip

e

In Pl. E

nd

wall

In Pl. 4

8"

Conc. Pip

e

Inv. In =

212. 0

0'

In Pl. H

ead

wall

66.8

2')

(N 74°2

9'0

3" E

15.6

2')

(N 86°2

8'0

0" E

24.27')

(N 05°09'39" W

86.52')

(S 4

5°27'06" E

100.6

3')

(S 83°5

7'2

5" E

32.3

2')

(N 73°2

9'5

3" E

L= 82.26')

(R= 5842.58'

(N 09°08'22" E 206.18')

RW

Mon.

RW

Mon.

RW

Mon.

RW Pin


Existing VDOT Limited Access R/W per Plans 0095-089-101N 74°3

0'2

4" E

(S 86°0

7'2

5" E 208.6

9')

LR070001120

Ex. Per

manent

Preservation Ease

ment

DB 293

Pg. 10

3

Ex. 20' San. Sewer Ease

ment

S86°0

6'5

3"E

(S 25°14'20" E 263.66')

(S 04°16'29" E 159.25')

S05°12'05"W

(S 05°11'33" W 218.08')

(R = 280.00')

(A = 196.76')

(R = 5842.58')

(A = 228.73')THE PRESERVE AT SMITH RUNHOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATIONInst.# 1200007122. 436 AC.

TAX MAP# 7769-96-4560

THE PRESERVE AT SMITH RUN

HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION

Inst.# 120000712

2. 436 AC.

TAX MAP# 7769-96-4560

HYLTON VENTURE, LLC

Inst.# 060000272

GPIN# 7769-94-7825

75.53247 AC. (Total)

9.39636 AC.



VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

REVISEDSTATE

STATE


PROJECT SHEET NO.

PROJECT MANAGER

SURVEYED BY, DATE

DESIGN BY


VA.

0

SCALE

50' 100'

3






0095-111-278

RW-201, C-501

0095-111-278


RICE & Associates

Accumark, 3/18/16



will determine wall size and location.

Final Plan Design and Noise Analysis

Sound Wall location is preliminary.

Ultimate CD Road Ultimate CD Road

62

63

64

65

66

67

68

69

70

71

72

73

74

75

POE STA 75+45.66

147

148

149

150

151

152

153

154

155

156

157

158

159

160

161

162

MA

TC

H

LIN

E -

ST

A. 14

7+0

0 -

SE

E

BE

LO

W

MA

TC

H

LIN

E -

ST

A. 14

7+0

0 -

SE

E

AB

OV

E

10

10

I-95 NBI-95 NB BL

I-95 NBI-95 NB BL

ULTIMATE NB CD-ROAD

ULTIMATE NB CD-ROAD BL

ULTIMATE NB CD-ROADULTIMATE NB CD-ROAD BL

MAT

CH

LIN

E -

ST

A. 13

3+0

0 -

SE

E

SH

EE

T 9





End Proposed Noise Barrier (Option 1)

48

49

50

51

52

53

54

55

56

57

58

59

60

61

PCC STA 47+45.32

PT STA 59+56.78

133

134

135

136

137

138

139

140

141

142

143

144

145

146

147

PT STA 146+72.86

35

Response to Request for Proposals

I-95 SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS AT ROUTE 3City of Fredericksburg, Virginia

State Project No.: 0095-111-278Federal Project No.: OC-095-2(535)Contract ID Nmber: C00107715DB91

PRICE PROPOSAL

Submit ted by:

in ASSociAtion With:

ORIGINAL

4.0.1.2 - Price Proposal Checklist

4.0.1.2 - Price Proposal Checklist

1 of 1

ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.2

DESIGN-BUILD PRICE PROPOSAL CHECKLIST

Addendum No. 3 Project Name: I-95 Safety Improvements at Route 3

Contract ID Number: C00107715DB91

Contents of Price Proposal:

Cost Breakdown Summary in whole numbers and the Proposal Price, in both numbers and words which is the sum (Total Price) for the Base Scope and Option 1 (Attachment 4.3.1)

Price Adjustment Information and Forms for Fuel and Asphalt for the Base Scope and Option 1, including identification of pay items and associated quantities eligible for adjustment (Part 3, Section 6.3, and Attachments 6.3)

Proposal Guaranty (C-24) required by Section 102.07 of Part 5, Division I Amendments to the Standard Specifications for the Base Scope and Option 1

Sworn Statement Forms (C-104, C-105, Attachments 4.3.4(a) and 4.3.4(b))

CD-ROM containing the entire Price Proposal in a single cohesiveAdobe PDF file

X

X

X

X

X

4.3.1 - Proposal Price

4.3.1 - Proposal Price

4.3.2 - Adjustment to Asphalt & Fuel Prices

4.3.2 - Adjustment to Asphalt & Fuel Prices

4.3.3 - Proposal Guaranty

4.3.3 - Proposal Guaranty

4.3.4 - Sworn Statem

ent Forms

4.3.4 - Sworn Statement Forms

r r i-95 safety improvements at route 3 · i-95 safety improvements at route 3 city of...

Documents