quneitra governorate: 1. population categories 4 100,561 … · 4 100,561 48,720 1,074 0 6,023...
TRANSCRIPT
4 100,561 48,720 1,074 0 6,023
Severity Number of sub-districts Total population People in Need IDPs Returnees In Besieged/ Militarily
encircled locationsIn Hard-to-reach
locations
000000melborp oN
000000melborp roniM
000000melborp etaredoM
0098722,1092,31melborp rojaM
00752495,81152,731melborp ereveS
227,30876072,71164,641melborp lacitirC
103,2005926,11955,311melborp cihportsataC
3. CONFLICT INCIDENTSNumber of reported conflict incidents by type (from 1 January 2015 to 31 July 2017)
HFA - Handheld fire arms; HWF - Heavy weapon fire; IED - Improvised explosive device
1. POPULATION CATEGORIESQUNEITRA GOVERNORATE:
-
300
600
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul
710261025102
Airstrike HFA* HWF* IED*/Explosion
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!#*
!
!#*
!
P
Me
dit
err
an
ea
nS
ea
Fiq
Al-Butayhah
Quneitra
KhanArnaba
Al-Khashniyyeh
Masaada
Jasim
Nawa
SheikhMiskineTassil
As-Sanamayn
Ghabagheb
Dara
Ash-Shajara Dael
Mzeireb
Qatana
QatanaQatana
Sasa
Bait Jan
J O R D A N
L E B A N O N
QUNEIT RA
#* Besieged locations, Sep 2017
! Military encircled locations, Sep 2017
UNDOF administered area
2. SECTOR SEVERITY RANKING BY SUB-DISTRICT
Severity ranks
No data
1 - Minor problem
2 - Moderate problem
3 - Major problem
4 - Severe problem
5 - Critical problem
6 - Catastrophic problem
To be updated
QUNEITRA GOVERNORATE PROTECTION ISSUES
4. PROTECTION ISSUES
a. Occurrence of protection issues
i. Analysis coverage (Number of communities covered in the analysis and number of those communities reporting occurrence of protection issues)
HIGHLIGHTS
ii. Percentage of covered communities reporting protection issues as occurring
*For explosive hazards indicator: this % applies to communities located in sub-districts where 99% of conflict incidents in the country, have taken place since January 2015.
98%
93%
89%
67%
41%
25%
25%
25%
21%
21%
18%
18%
5%
Child labour preventing school attendance
Lack/loss of civil documents
Early marriage
Explosive hazards*
Housing/land/property issues
Child recruitment
Domestic violence
Family separation
Sexual violence
Sexual harassment
Economic exploitation
Harassment
Kidnapping/Abduction
44 44 44 42 44 44 44 44 43 43 44 44 43 43 41 39 28 18 11 11 11 9 9 8 8 20
243Covered in the analysis Reported as occurring (at least sometimes) Total number of communities in the Governorate
• 44 communities were covered in Quneitra governorate with one or more protection issues.• 98% of covered communities reported child labor preventing school attendance as occurring and 93% reported lack/loss of civil documentation as
occurring. • Child labor preventing school attendance was mentioned as a “common” issue for one or more population groups by 43% of covered communities
while lack/loss of civil documentation was mentioned as a “common” issue for one or more population groups by 45% of covered communities. • Boys are the most affected by child labor preventing school attendance, mentioned as a “common” issue by 43% of covered communities
(adolescents) and by 20% of covered communities (boys under 12). • 34% of covered communities described “children dropping out of school to work” as a coping mechanism “commonly” used by one or more population
groups and 45% mentioned early marriage as a coping mechanism “sometimes” used by one or more population groups. • 45% of covered communities identified relying on humanitarian assistance as a coping mechanism that was “sometimes” used by one or more
population groups, while accessing community services (29%) and local community support (26%) were also described as used “sometimes” by one or more population groups.
• Movement restrictions were reported as occurring in 32% of covered communities. Out of those, 64% covered communities reported checkpoints, presence of explosive hazards and rules imposed by concerned authorities (57%) among reasons, while IDPs (64%), men and boys (57%) were mentioned as the most affected groups by movement restrictions.
• Needs for protection services were identified for all population groups, in particular women and girls centers (59% covered communities reported it was needed but not present for one or more population groups) and community centers (52% covered communities reported it was needed but not present for one or more population groups).
• 59% of covered communities reported concerns with humanitarian assistance. Out of the total covered, 17 indicated that the assistance delivered was not “what the community needed” and 15 communities mentioned the request for documentation to access assistance as a concern.
• Among covered communities having reported lack/loss of civil documentation as occurring, 98% indicated “could not afford it” and 88% “government services are not present” among causes while 100% reported the inability to register birth/marriage/death and 98% mentioned “cannot register land/access transactions” among consequences.
• All types of documents were described as difficult to obtain by 85% of covered communities or more having reported lack/loss of civil documentation as occurring, in particular travel authorization document and deed/tabou that were mentioned as difficult to obtain in 100% of covered communities.
• 41% of covered communities reported housing, land and property issues as occurring. Out of those, 78% mentioned “damage of land or property” as an HLP concern happening “sometimes” while “rental disputes” were described as a “common” HLP concern by 17% of covered communities.
QUNEITRA GOVERNORATE PROTECTION ISSUES
b. Overview of Protection issues with frequency of occurrence
i. Graphs showing percentage out of communities that were covered in the analysis, using two different aggregation options across population groups
ii. Graphs showing percentage out of communities that were covered in the analysis, by population group
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%2% 0% 7% 0% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0%
95% 25%18%
89% 16% 64% 23% 16% 39% 5% 93% 21% 21%
2%
75% 75%
11%
82%
33%
75% 82%
59%
95%
7%
79% 79%
Child labour preventingschool attendance
Child recruitment Domestic violence Early marriage Economic exploitation Explosive hazards Family separation Harassment Housing/land/propertyissues
Kidnapping/Abduction Lack/loss of civildocuments
Sexual harassment Sexual violence
AVERAGE FREQUENCY across population groups
0.0% 0.0% 2.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 4.5% 0.0% 0.0%
43%
0%9% 14%
5%
31%
5% 9% 9%0%
45%
7% 5%
55%
25%
14% 75%14%
36%
20%9% 32%
5%
43%
14% 16%
2%
75% 75%
11%
82%
33%
75% 82%
59%
95%
7%
79% 79%
Child labour preventingschool attendance
Child recruitment Domestic violence Early marriage Economic exploitation Explosive hazards Family separation Harassment Housing/land/propertyissues
Kidnapping/Abduction Lack/loss of civildocuments
Sexual harassment Sexual violence
HIGHEST FREQUENCY occurrence as per one or more population groups Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%0% 0% 7% 0% 0% 0% 0% 5% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0%7% 2%
16%2% 14% 7% 14% 7% 0% 0% 20% 7% 7%
93% 98%77%
98%86% 93% 86% 89% 98% 100%
80%93% 93%
Child labour preventingschool attendance
Child recruitment Domestic violence Early marriage Economic exploitation Explosive hazards Family separation Harassment Housing/land/propertyissues
Kidnapping/Abduction Lack/loss of civildocuments
Sexual harassment Sexual violence
Persons with disabilities
QUNEITRA GOVERNORATE PROTECTION ISSUES
ii. Graphs showing percentage out of communities that were covered in the analysis, by population group- contd
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%4.5%
0.0% 0.0%0% 2%
31%
0% 0%9%
0%
45%
0% 0%7% 14%
36%
25% 11%32%
5%
43%
2% 0%
93%84%
33%
75%89%
59%
95%
7%
98% 100%
Domestic violence Economic exploitation Explosive hazards Family separation Harassment Housing/land/property issues Kidnapping/Abduction Lack/loss of civil documents Sexual harassment Sexual violence
Men Very common issue Common issueSometimes Never happens
2.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
7%2% 0% 2% 2% 2% 0% 7% 7% 2%
16%16% 55% 18% 14% 27% 0%
58% 14%19%
75% 82%
45%
80% 84%70%
100%
35%
79% 79%
Domestic violence Economic exploitation Explosive hazards Family separation Harassment Housing/land/property issues Kidnapping/Abduction Lack/loss of civil documents Sexual harassment Sexual violence
Women
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
43%
0% 5% 2% 2%12% 5% 2% 0% 0%
9%0% 0%
55%
25%18% 43% 14%
52%9% 9% 7% 0%
59%9% 2%
2%
75% 77%
55%
84%
36%
86% 89% 93% 100%
32%
91% 98%
Child labour preventingschool attendance
Child recruitment Domestic violence Early marriage Economic exploitation Explosive hazards Family separation Harassment Housing/land/propertyissues
Kidnapping/Abduction Lack/loss of civildocuments
Sexual harassment Sexual violence
Adolescent boys
QUNEITRA GOVERNORATE PROTECTION ISSUES
ii. Graphs showing percentage out of communities that were covered in the analysis, by population group- contd
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
7% 0%9% 11%
2% 2% 5% 5% 0% 0% 0% 2% 2%
75%5%
14% 75%11% 40% 9% 14%
7% 0% 63% 19% 9%
18%
95%77%
14%
86%
57%
86% 82%93% 100%
37%
79%88%
Child labour preventingschool attendance
Child recruitment Domestic violence Early marriage Economic exploitation Explosive hazards Family separation Harassment Housing/land/propertyissues
Kidnapping/Abduction Lack/loss of civildocuments
Sexual harassment Sexual violence
Adolescent girlsVery common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
20%
0% 7% 0% 2% 2% 2% 0% 0% 2% 0% 0%
61%
5%16%
18% 14% 55% 11% 11% 0% 59% 9% 5%
18%
95%77% 82% 84%
43%
86% 89%100%
39%
91% 95%
Child labour preventingschool attendance
Child recruitment Domestic violence Early marriage Economic exploitation Explosive hazards Family separation Harassment Kidnapping/Abduction Lack/loss of civildocuments
Sexual harassment Sexual violence
Boys
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%2% 0% 7% 0% 2% 5% 2% 2% 0% 0% 2% 0%
66% 5%16%
11% 11% 38% 11% 9% 0% 59% 9% 5%
32%
95%77%
89% 86%
57%
86% 89%100%
41%
88% 95%
Child labour preventingschool attendance
Child recruitment Domestic violence Early marriage Economic exploitation Explosive hazards Family separation Harassment Kidnapping/Abduction Lack/loss of civildocuments
Sexual harassment Sexual violence
Girls
QUNEITRA GOVERNORATE PROTECTION ISSUES
c. Analysis per protection issue across population groups (with frequency of occurrence)
CHILD LABOUR PREVENTING SCHOOL ATTENDANCEi. Map of communities by frequency of occurrence across population groups (using highest frequency as per one or more population groups)
ii. Percentage of communities by frequency of occurrence (across population groups and per population group)
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%2%
43% 43%
7%20%
2% 0%
95%
55% 55%
75%61%
66%
7%
2% 2% 2%18% 18%
32%
93%
Aggregated (averagefrequency)
Aggregated (highestfrequency)
Adolescent boys Adolescent girls Boys Girls Persons withdisabilities
Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens
P
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
QUNEITRA
DARA
RURALDAMASCUS
Fiq
Al-Butayhah
Quneitra
KhanArnaba
Al-Khashniyyeh
Masaada
Izra
Jasim
Hrak
Hrak
Nawa
SheikhMiskineTassil
As-Sanamayn
Ghabagheb
Dara
KherbetGhazala
Ash-ShajaraDael
Mzeireb
Qatana Qatana
Sasa
Bait Jan Kisweh
J O R D A N
L E B A N O N
Frequency of occurrence! Never happens
! Sometimes
! Common issue
! Very common issue! Not covered in analysis
QUNEITRA GOVERNORATE PROTECTION ISSUES
CHILD RECRUITMENTi. Map of communities by frequency of occurrence across population groups (using highest frequency as per one or more population groups)
ii. Percentage of communities by frequency of occurrence (across population groups and per population group)
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
25% 25% 25%
5% 5% 5% 2%
75% 75% 75%
95% 95% 95% 98%
Aggregated (averagefrequency)
Aggregated (highestfrequency)
Adolescent boys Adolescent girls Boys Girls Persons with disabilities
Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens
P
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
QUNEITRA
DARA
RURALDAMASCUS
Fiq
Al-Butayhah
Quneitra
KhanArnaba
Al-Khashniyyeh
Masaada
Izra
Jasim
Hrak
Hrak
Nawa
SheikhMiskineTassil
As-Sanamayn
Ghabagheb
Dara
KherbetGhazala
Ash-ShajaraDael
Mzeireb
Qatana Qatana
Sasa
Bait Jan Kisweh
J O R D A N
L E B A N O N
Frequency of occurrence! Never happens
! Sometimes
! Common issue
! Very common issue! Not covered in analysis
QUNEITRA GOVERNORATE PROTECTION ISSUES
EARLY MARRIAGEi. Map of communities by frequency of occurrence across population groups (using highest frequency as per one or more population groups)
ii. Percentage of communities by frequency of occurrence (across population groups and per population group)
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%0%
14%2%
11%0% 0% 0%
89%75%
43%
75%
18% 11%2%
11% 11%
55%
14%
82% 89%98%
Aggregated (averagefrequency)
Aggregated (highestfrequency)
Adolescent boys Adolescent girls Boys Girls Persons with disabilities
Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens
P
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
QUNEITRA
DARA
RURALDAMASCUS
Fiq
Al-Butayhah
Quneitra
KhanArnaba
Al-Khashniyyeh
Masaada
Izra
Jasim
Hrak
Hrak
Nawa
SheikhMiskineTassil
As-Sanamayn
Ghabagheb
Dara
KherbetGhazala
Ash-ShajaraDael
Mzeireb
Qatana Qatana
Sasa
Bait Jan Kisweh
J O R D A N
L E B A N O N
Frequency of occurrence! Never happens
! Sometimes
! Common issue
! Very common issue! Not covered in analysis
QUNEITRA GOVERNORATE PROTECTION ISSUES
ECONOMIC EXPLOITATIONi. Map of communities by frequency of occurrence across population groups (using highest frequency as per one or more population groups)
ii. Percentage of communities by frequency of occurrence (across population groups and per population group)
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%2% 5% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 0%
16% 14% 14% 16% 14% 11% 14% 11% 14%
82% 82% 84% 82% 84% 86% 84% 86% 86%
Aggregated(average
frequency)
Aggregated(highest frequency)
Men Women Adolescent boys Adolescent girls Boys Girls Persons withdisabilities
P
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
QUNEITRA
DARA
RURALDAMASCUS
Fiq
Al-Butayhah
Quneitra
KhanArnaba
Al-Khashniyyeh
Masaada
Izra
Jasim
Hrak
Hrak
Nawa
SheikhMiskineTassil
As-Sanamayn
Ghabagheb
Dara
KherbetGhazala
Ash-ShajaraDael
Mzeireb
Qatana Qatana
Sasa
Bait Jan Kisweh
J O R D A N
L E B A N O N
Frequency of occurrence! Never happens
! Sometimes
! Common issue
! Very common issue! Not covered in analysis
QUNEITRA GOVERNORATE PROTECTION ISSUES
EXPLOSIVE HAZARDSi. Map of communities by frequency of occurrence across population groups (using highest frequency as per one or more population groups)
ii. Percentage of communities by frequency of occurrence (across population groups and per population group)
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%2%
31% 31%
0%12%
2% 2% 5% 0%
64%
36% 36%
55%
52%
40%55%
38%
7%
33% 33% 33%45%
36%
57%43%
57%
93%
Aggregated(average
frequency)
Aggregated(highest frequency)
Men Women Adolescent boys Adolescent girls Boys Girls Persons withdisabilities
Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens
P
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
QUNEITRA
DARA
RURALDAMASCUS
Fiq
Al-Butayhah
Quneitra
KhanArnaba
Al-Khashniyyeh
Masaada
Izra
Jasim
Hrak
Hrak
Nawa
SheikhMiskineTassil
As-Sanamayn
Ghabagheb
Dara
KherbetGhazala
Ash-ShajaraDael
Mzeireb
Qatana Qatana
Sasa
Bait Jan Kisweh
J O R D A N
L E B A N O N
Frequency of occurrence! Never happens
! Sometimes
! Common issue
! Very common issue! Not covered in analysis
! Community in sub-district that has not reported high intensity conflict in last 2 years
QUNEITRA GOVERNORATE PROTECTION ISSUES
FAMILY SEPARATIONi. Map of communities by frequency of occurrence across population groups (using highest frequency as per one or more population groups)
ii. Percentage of communities by frequency of occurrence (across population groups and per population group)
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%2% 5% 0% 2% 5% 5% 2% 2% 0%
23% 20% 25% 18% 9% 9% 11% 11% 14%
75% 75% 75% 80% 86% 86% 86% 86% 86%
Aggregated(average
frequency)
Aggregated(highest frequency)
Men Women Adolescent boys Adolescent girls Boys Girls Persons withdisabilities
Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens
P
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
QUNEITRA
DARA
RURALDAMASCUS
Fiq
Al-Butayhah
Quneitra
KhanArnaba
Al-Khashniyyeh
Masaada
Izra
Jasim
Hrak
Hrak
Nawa
SheikhMiskineTassil
As-Sanamayn
Ghabagheb
Dara
KherbetGhazala
Ash-ShajaraDael
Mzeireb
Qatana Qatana
Sasa
Bait Jan Kisweh
J O R D A N
L E B A N O N
Frequency of occurrence! Never happens
! Sometimes
! Common issue
! Very common issue! Not covered in analysis
QUNEITRA GOVERNORATE PROTECTION ISSUES
HARASSMENTi. Map of communities by frequency of occurrence across population groups (using highest frequency as per one or more population groups)
ii. Percentage of communities by frequency of occurrence (across population groups and per population group)
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%2% 9%
0% 2% 2% 5% 0% 2% 5%16%
9%
11% 14% 9% 14%11% 9% 7%
82% 82% 89% 84% 89% 82% 89% 89% 89%
Aggregated(average
frequency)
Aggregated(highest frequency)
Men Women Adolescent boys Adolescent girls Boys Girls Persons withdisabilities
Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens
P
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
QUNEITRA
DARA
RURALDAMASCUS
Fiq
Al-Butayhah
Quneitra
KhanArnaba
Al-Khashniyyeh
Masaada
Izra
Jasim
Hrak
Hrak
Nawa
SheikhMiskineTassil
As-Sanamayn
Ghabagheb
Dara
KherbetGhazala
Ash-ShajaraDael
Mzeireb
Qatana Qatana
Sasa
Bait Jan Kisweh
J O R D A N
L E B A N O N
Frequency of occurrence! Never happens
! Sometimes
! Common issue
! Very common issue! Not covered in analysis
QUNEITRA GOVERNORATE PROTECTION ISSUES
HOUSING, LAND AND PROPERTY ISSUESi. Map of communities by frequency of occurrence across population groups (using highest frequency as per one or more population groups)
ii. Percentage of communities by frequency of occurrence (across population groups and per population group)
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%2% 9% 9% 2% 0% 0% 2%
39% 32% 32%
27%
7% 7% 0%
59% 59% 59%70%
93% 93% 98%
Aggregated (averagefrequency)
Aggregated (highestfrequency)
Men Women Adolescent boys Adolescent girls Persons with disabilities
Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens
P
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
QUNEITRA
DARA
RURALDAMASCUS
Fiq
Al-Butayhah
Quneitra
KhanArnaba
Al-Khashniyyeh
Masaada
Izra
Jasim
Hrak
Hrak
Nawa
SheikhMiskineTassil
As-Sanamayn
Ghabagheb
Dara
KherbetGhazala
Ash-ShajaraDael
Mzeireb
Qatana Qatana
Sasa
Bait Jan Kisweh
J O R D A N
L E B A N O N
Frequency of occurrence! Never happens
! Sometimes
! Common issue
! Very common issue! Not covered in analysis
QUNEITRA GOVERNORATE PROTECTION ISSUES
KIDNAPPINGi. Map of communities by frequency of occurrence across population groups (using highest frequency as per one or more population groups)
ii. Percentage of communities by frequency of occurrence (across population groups and per population group)
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%5% 5% 5% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
95% 95% 95% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Aggregated(average
frequency)
Aggregated(highest frequency)
Men Women Adolescent boys Adolescent girls Boys Girls Persons withdisabilities
Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens
P
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
QUNEITRA
DARA
RURALDAMASCUS
Fiq
Al-Butayhah
Quneitra
KhanArnaba
Al-Khashniyyeh
Masaada
Izra
Jasim
Hrak
Hrak
Nawa
SheikhMiskineTassil
As-Sanamayn
Ghabagheb
Dara
KherbetGhazala
Ash-ShajaraDael
Mzeireb
Qatana Qatana
Sasa
Bait Jan Kisweh
J O R D A N
L E B A N O N
Frequency of occurrence! Never happens
! Sometimes
! Common issue
! Very common issue! Not covered in analysis
QUNEITRA GOVERNORATE PROTECTION ISSUES
LACK/LOSS OF CIVIL DOCUMENTSi. Map of communities by frequency of occurrence across population groups (using highest frequency as per one or more population groups)
ii. Percentage of communities by frequency of occurrence (across population groups and per population group)
0.0% 4.5% 4.5%0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0%
45% 45%
7% 9%0% 2% 0% 0%
93%
43% 43%
58% 59%63% 59% 59%
20%
7% 7% 7%
35% 32% 37% 39% 41%
80%
Aggregated(average
frequency)
Aggregated(highest
frequency)
Men Women Adolescent boys Adolescent girls Boys Girls Persons withdisabilities
Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens
P
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
QUNEITRA
DARA
RURALDAMASCUS
Fiq
Al-Butayhah
Quneitra
KhanArnaba
Al-Khashniyyeh
Masaada
Izra
Jasim
Hrak
Hrak
Nawa
SheikhMiskineTassil
As-Sanamayn
Ghabagheb
Dara
KherbetGhazala
Ash-ShajaraDael
Mzeireb
Qatana Qatana
Sasa
Bait Jan Kisweh
J O R D A N
L E B A N O N
Frequency of occurrence! Never happens
! Sometimes
! Common issue
! Very common issue! Not covered in analysis
QUNEITRA GOVERNORATE PROTECTION ISSUES
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
SEXUAL HARASSMENT
SEXUAL VIOLENCE
i. Percentage of communities by frequency of occurrence (across population groups and per population group)
i. Percentage of communities by frequency of occurrence (across population groups and per population group)
i. Percentage of communities by frequency of occurrence (across population groups and per population group)
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0%7%
0%7%
0% 2% 0% 2% 0%21%
14%2%
14%9% 19% 9% 9% 7%
79% 79%
98%
79%91%
79%91% 88% 93%
Aggregated(average
frequency)
Aggregated(highest
frequency)
Men Women Adolescent boys Adolescent girls Boys Girls Persons withdisabilities
Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0% 5% 0% 2% 0% 2% 0% 0% 0%21%
16%0% 19% 2% 9% 5% 5% 7%
79% 79%
100%
79%
98%88%
95% 95% 93%
Aggregated(average
frequency)
Aggregated(highest
frequency)
Men Women Adolescent boys Adolescent girls Boys Girls Persons withdisabilities
Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens
0.0% 2.3% 0.0% 2.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
7%9%
0%7%
5% 9% 7% 7% 7%
18% 14%
7%
16%18% 14% 16% 16% 16%
75% 75%
93%
75% 77% 77% 77% 77% 77%
Aggregated(average
frequency)
Aggregated(highest frequency)
Men Women Adolescent boys Adolescent girls Boys Girls Persons withdisabilities
Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens
QUNEITRA GOVERNORATE COPING MECHANISMS
5. COPING MECHANISMS
i. Analysis coverage
Number of communities covered in the analysis and number of communities reporting use of coping mechanism (i.e. used at least “sometimes” or more)
ii. Percentage of covered communities reporting the use of coping mechanisms by frequency of occurrence
Across population groups
Graph a: Taking the highest frequency of occurrence at community level
Graph b: Taking the average frequency of occurrence at community level
38 38 37 38 38 38 38 38
6
35
13 12
29
21
14
20
0
49
Begging Children dropping out ofschool to work
Engaging in illegalactivities (i.e theft,
smuggling)
Restricting movements ofwomen and girls
Relying on humanitarianassistance
Accessing communityservices (community
centres, women centres)
Local/community support Early marriage
Covered in the analysis Reported as used (at least sometimes)Total number of communities in Governorate
45%63%
50%32%
5% 3%
0% 3%
Accessing communityservices (community
centres, womencentres)
Local/communitysupport
Always used
Commonly used
Sometimes used
Never used
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%0%
37%
8%0% 0%
29%16%
55%
45%35% 32%
47%84%
8%
47%65% 68%
24%
Begging Childrendropping out ofschool to work
Early marriage Engaging inillegal activities
(i.e theft,smuggling)
Restrictingmovements of
women and girls
Relying onhumanitarianassistance
Never used
Sometimes used
Commonly used
Always used
68% 68%
29% 26%
3% 3%
0% 3%
Accessing communityservices (community
centres, womencentres)
Local/communitysupport
Always used
Commonly used
Sometimes used
Never used
0% 3% 3% 0% 0%5%
3%34% 5%
0% 0%
45%13%
55%
45%
35%32%
26%
84%
8%
47%
65% 68%
24%
Begging Childrendropping out ofschool to work
Early marriage Engaging inillegal activities
(i.e theft,smuggling)
Restrictingmovements of
women and girls
Relying onhumanitarianassistance
Never used
Sometimes used
Commonly used
Always used
QUNEITRA GOVERNORATE COPING MECHANISMS
ii. Percentage of covered communities reporting the use of coping mechanisms by frequency of occurrence -contd
By population groups
66% 66%
29% 29%
3% 3%
3% 3%
Accessing communityservices (community
centres, womencentres)
Local/communitysupport
Always used
Commonly used
Sometimes used
Never used
0% 0% 3%0% 0%
47%
8% 35%
26%92%
65%
24%
Begging Engaging in illegalactivities (i.e theft,
smuggling)
Relying onhumanitarianassistance
Men
Never used
Sometimes used
Commonly used
Always used
47%63%
42%
32%
8% 3%
3% 3%
Accessing communityservices (community
centres, womencentres)
Local/communitysupport
Always used
Commonly used
Sometimes used
Never used
0% 0% 0% 3%0% 0% 0%
26%8% 11% 32%
45%
92% 89%
68%
26%
Begging Engaging inillegal activities
(i.e theft,smuggling)
Restrictingmovements of
women and girls
Relying onhumanitarianassistance
Women
Never used
Sometimes used
Commonly used
Always used
58%68%
39% 26%
3% 3%
0% 3%
Accessingcommunity services(community centres,
women centres)
Local/communitysupport
Always used
Commonly used
Sometimes used
Never used
0% 3% 0% 0% 0%
3%
34%
0% 0%14%
13%
55%
37% 19%
59%
84%
8%
63%81%
27%
Begging Childrendropping out ofschool to work
Early marriage Engaging inillegal activities
(i.e theft,smuggling)
Relying onhumanitarianassistance
Boys
Never used
Sometimes used
Commonly used
Always used
47%66%
47%29%
5% 3%
0% 3%
Accessingcommunity services(community centres,
women centres)
Local/communitysupport
Always used
Commonly used
Sometimes used
Never used
0% 0% 3% 0% 0% 0%0% 8% 5%
0% 0%14%11%
74% 45%5% 29%
49%
89%
18%
47%
95%
71%
38%
Begging Children droppingout of school to
work
Early marriage Engaging inillegal activities
(i.e theft,smuggling)
Restrictingmovements of
women and girls
Relying onhumanitarianassistance
Graph d: Girls
Never used
Sometimes used
Commonly used
Always used
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
QUNEITRA
DARA
RURALDAMASCUS
J O R D A N
L E B A N O N
Fiq
Al-Butayhah
Quneitra
KhanArnaba
Al-Khashniyyeh
Masaada
Izra
Jasim
Hrak
NawaSheikhMiskineTassil
As-Sanamayn
Ghabagheb
Dara
KherbetGhazala
Ash-ShajaraDael
Mzeireb
Qatana
Sasa
Bait JanKisweh
Communities where coping mechanisms used are! Covered! Not covered in the analysis
BeggingChildren dropping out of school to workEarly marriageEngaging in illegal activities (i.e theft, smuggling)Restricting movements of women and girlsRelying on humanitarian assistanceAccessing community services (community centres, women centres)Local/community support
Coping mechanisms used(Top 3 reported by most % communitiesin the sub-district)
iii. Map of top three coping mechanisms used per sub-district (based on percentage of communities reporting occurrence)
NOTE: The pie charts on the maps illustrate the top three options reported in the sub-district, based on the percentage of communities reporting eachoption as occurring sometimes or more. They are NOT indicative of the frequency/severity of occurrence. In sub-districts where the pie chart showsmore than three options, it means that all displayed options were reported by the same percentage of communities. In sub-districts where the pie chartshows less than three options, it means that only displayed options were reported.
COPING MECHANISMS USED PER SUB-DISTRICT
QUNEITRA GOVERNORATE MOVEMENT RESTRICTIONS
6. MOVEMENT RESTRICTIONS
a.Causes of movement restrictions
i. Analysis coverage
Number of communities covered by the analysis and number of communities reporting causes of movement restrictions as occurring
ii. Percentage of communities reporting causes of movement restrictions (by frequency of occurrence)
iii. Percentage of communities reporting specific causes, out of those reporting occurrence of movement restrictions
44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44
8 9 3 5 7 8 8 7 0
49
Activities of armedgroups
Checkpoints Curfews General violence Lack of identitydocuments
Presence of explosivehazards
Rules imposed byconcerned authorities
Screening processes
Covered in the analysis Reported as occurring (as least sometimes) Total number of communities in the Governorate
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
5% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
14% 18%7% 11% 16% 18% 18% 16%
82% 80%93% 89% 84% 82% 82% 84%
Activities of armedgroups
Checkpoints Curfews General violence Lack of identitydocuments
Presence ofexplosive hazards
Rules imposed byconcerned authorities
Screening processes
Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens
YES (movement
restrictions are reported as occurring)
14 32%
NO (movement restrictions
are not reported as occurring)
30 68%
64%
57%
57%
57%
50%
50%
36%
21%
Checkpoints
Presence of explosive hazards
Rules imposed by concerned authorities
Activities of armed groups
Lack of identity documents
Screening processes
General violence
Curfews
NOTE: The pie charts on the maps illustrate the top three options reported in the sub-district, based on the percentage of communities reporting eachoption as occurring sometimes or more. They are NOT indicative of the frequency/severity of occurrence. In sub-districts where the pie chart showsmore than three options, it means that all displayed options were reported by the same percentage of communities. In sub-districts where the pie chartshows less than three options, it means that only displayed options were reported.
iv. Map of top three causes of movement restrictions per sub-district (based on percentage of communities reporting occurrence)
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
QUNEITRA
DARA
RURALDAMASCUS
J O R D A N
L E B A N O N
Izra
Jasim
Hrak
NawaSheikhMiskine
Tassil
As-SanamaynMasmiyyeh
Ghabagheb
Dara
KherbetGhazala
Ash-ShajaraDael
Mzeireb
Mseifra
Qatana
Sasa
Bait Jan Kisweh
Fiq
Al-Butayhah
Quneitra
KhanArnaba
Al-Khashniyyeh
Masaada
Activities of armed groupsCheckpointsCurfews
General violenceLack of identity documentsPresence of explosive hazardsRules imposed by concerned authoritiesScreening processes
Communities where movement restrictions were! Reported! NOT reported! Not covered in analysis
CAUSES OF MOVEMENT RESTRICTIONS PER SUB-DISTRICT
Causes of movementrestrictions(Top 3 reported by most% communitiesin the sub-district)
QUNEITRA GOVERNORATE MOVEMENT RESTRICTIONS
b. Population groups affected by movement restrictions
i. Analysis coverage
Number of communities covered by the analysis and number of communities reporting population groups affected by movement restrictions (by occurrence)
ii. Percentage of communities reporting population groups affected by movement restrictions (by frequency of occurrence)
iii. Percentage of communities reporting specific affected population groups, out of those reporting occurrence of movement restrictions
44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44
4 7 3 7 3 8 8 7 9 0
49
Persons withdisabilities
Girls (<18) movingalone
Girls (<18) movingwith a companion
Women movingalone
Women moving witha companion
Boys (<18) Men People without civildocumentation
IDPs
Covered in the analysis Reported as occurring (as least sometimes) Total number of communities in Syria
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%0.0% 0.0%
0% 5% 0% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%9%
11%7%
14%7%
18% 18% 16% 20%
91% 84%93%
84%93%
82% 82% 84% 80%
Persons withdisabilities
Girls (<18) movingalone
Girls (<18) movingwith a companion
Women moving alone Women moving with acompanion
Boys (<18) Men People without civildocumentation
IDPs
Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens
64%
57%
57%
50%
50%
50%
21%
21%
IDPs
Men
Boys (<18)
Women moving alone
People without civil documentation
Girls (<18) moving alone
Girls (<18) moving with a companion
Women moving with a companion
NOTE: The pie charts on the maps illustrate the top three options reported in the sub-district, based on the percentage of communities reporting eachoption as occurring sometimes or more. They are NOT indicative of the frequency/severity of occurrence. In sub-districts where the pie chart showsmore than three options, it means that all displayed options were reported by the same percentage of communities. In sub-districts where the pie chartshows less than three options, it means that only displayed options were reported.
iv. Map of top three population groups affected by movement restrictions per sub-district (based on percentage of communitiesreporting occurrence)
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
QUNEITRA
DARA
RURALDAMASCUS
J O R D A N
L E B A N O N
Izra
Jasim
Hrak
Nawa SheikhMiskine
Tassil
As-SanamaynMasmiyyeh
Ghabagheb
Dara
KherbetGhazala
Ash-ShajaraDael
Mzeireb
Mseifra
Qatana
Sasa
Bait Jan Kisweh
Fiq
Al-Butayhah
Quneitra
KhanArnaba
Al-Khashniyyeh
Masaada
MenBoysGirls moving alone
Girls moving with a companionWomen moving aloneWomen moving with a companionPersons without civil documentationIDPsPersons with disabilities
Communities where movement restrictions were! Reported! NOT reported! Not covered in analysis
POPULATION GROUPS AFFECTED BY MOVEMENT RESTRICTIONS PER SUB-DISTRICT
Population groups affectedby movement restrictions(Top 3 reported by most% communitiesin the sub-district)
QUNEITRA GOVERNORATE PROTECTION SERVICES
7. PROTECTION SERVICES
ii. Percentage of communities reporting presence and needs of protection services across population groups
Across population groups
i. Analysis coverage (Number of communities covered by the analysis and number of communities reporting needs of protection services (i.e. “present but insufficient” or “not present but needed")
Graph a: Taking the most severe status of needs and presence
Graph b: Taking the average status of needs and presence
44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44
37 3733
31 3129
2623
2119
16
60
49
Community centres Women and girlscentres
Legal services for civildocumentation
Psychosocial supportfor sexual/domesticviolence survivors
Psychosocial supportservices
Recreational activitiesProtection services forchildren
Legal services forHousing, Land and
Property issues
Explosive hazard riskeducation
Services for personswith disabilities
Care mechanisms forelderly persons
Medical treatment forsexual/domestic
violence survivors
Covered in the analysis Reported as needed Total number of communities in the Govrenorate
48%59%
39%52%
32%45% 50%
11%
34%41%
25% 23%
36%25%
9%
23%
20%
25% 20%
2%
25%25%
11% 20%
2%9%
14%
14%
11%
14% 14%
9%
2%
7%
11%7%
14%7%
39%
11%
36%
16% 16%
77%
39%27%
52% 50%
Community centres Women and girlscentres
Explosive hazard riskeducation
Legal services forcivil documentation
Legal services forHousing, Land and
Property issues
Psychosocial supportservices
Psychosocial supportfor survivors of sexual
violence/domesticviolence
Medical treatment forsurvivors of sexualviolence/domestic
violence
Protection servicesfor children
Recreational activities Caremechanisms/services
for elderly persons
Services for personswith disabilities
52%59%
39%52%
34%
50% 50%
11%
34%43%
25% 25%
32%25%
9%
23%
20%
20% 20%
7%
25%
25%
11%18%
2%9%
14%
14%
9%
14% 14%
5%
2%
5%
11%7%
14%7%
39%
11%
36%
16% 16%
77%
39%27%
52% 50%
Community centres Women and girlscentres
Explosive hazard riskeducation
Legal services for civildocumentation
Legal services forHousing, Land and
Property issues
Psychosocial supportservices
Psychosocial supportfor survivors of sexual
violence/domesticviolence
Medical treatment forsurvivors of sexualviolence/domestic
violence
Protection services forchildren
Recreational activities Caremechanisms/services
for elderly persons
Services for personswith disabilities
Needed but not present Present but insufficient Present and sufficient Not present and not needed
QUNEITRA GOVERNORATE PROTECTION SERVICES
ii. Percentage of communities reporting presence and needs of protection services across population groups - contd
By population group
50% 39% 52% 34% 45% 43%9%
36% 25% 25%
34%
9%
23%
20%
20% 18%
2%
25%
11% 18%
2%
14%
14%
9%
14% 18%
5%
7%
11%7%
14%
39%
11%
36%20% 20%
84%
32%52% 50%
Community centres Explosive hazard riskeducation
Legal services for civildocumentation
Legal services forHousing, Land and
Property issues
Psychosocial supportservices
Psychosocial support forsurvivors of sexualviolence/domestic
violence
Medical treatment forsurvivors of sexualviolence/domestic
violence
Recreational activities Caremechanisms/services for
elderly persons
Services for persons withdisabilities
Men Needed but not present Present but insufficient Present and sufficient Not present and not needed
45% 57% 39% 52% 34% 45% 50% 11% 41% 25% 23%
36%27%
9%
23%
18%
23% 18%
7%
20%
11% 18%
5%9%
14%
14%
11%
16% 16%
2%
9%
11% 7%
14% 7%
39%
11%
36%
16% 16%
80%
30%
52% 52%
Community centres Women and girlscentres
Explosive hazard riskeducation
Legal services for civildocumentation
Legal services forHousing, Land and
Property issues
Psychosocial supportservices
Psychosocial supportfor survivors of sexual
violence/domesticviolence
Medical treatment forsurvivors of sexualviolence/domestic
violence
Recreational activities Caremechanisms/services
for elderly persons
Services for personswith disabilities
Women
50% 36% 50% 32% 41% 45% 11% 34% 41% 23%
34%
11%
25%
18%
30% 25%
2%
25%25%
20%
2%
14%
14%
11%
14% 14%
2%
2%7%
7%
14%
39%
11%
39%
16% 16%
84%
39%27%
50%
Community centres Explosive hazard riskeducation
Legal services for civildocumentation
Legal services forHousing, Land and
Property issues
Psychosocial supportservices
Psychosocial support forsurvivors of sexualviolence/domestic
violence
Medical treatment forsurvivors of sexualviolence/domestic
violence
Protection services forchildren
Recreational activities Services for persons withdisabilities
BoysNeeded but not present Present but insufficient Present and sufficient Not present and not needed
45% 59% 36% 50% 32% 45% 50% 11% 34% 41% 23%
36%25%
11%
25%
18%
23% 18%
7%
23%23%
18%
5%9%
14%
14%
11%
16% 16%
5%
5%9%
7%
14% 7%
39%
11%
39%
16% 16%
77%
39%27%
52%
Community centres Women and girlscentres
Explosive hazard riskeducation
Legal services for civildocumentation
Legal services forHousing, Land and
Property issues
Psychosocial supportservices
Psychosocial supportfor survivors of sexual
violence/domesticviolence
Medical treatment forsurvivors of sexualviolence/domestic
violence
Protection services forchildren
Recreational activities Services for personswith disabilities
Girls
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
QUNEITRA
DARA
RURALDAMASCUS
J O R D A N
L E B A N O N
Fiq
Al-Butayhah
Quneitra
KhanArnaba
Al-Khashniyyeh
Masaada
Izra
Jasim
Hrak
NawaSheikhMiskine
Tassil
As-Sanamayn
Ghabagheb
Dara
KherbetGhazala
Ash-ShajaraDael
Mzeireb
Qatana
Sasa
Bait Jan Kisweh
Communities where protection services are! Reported as needed! NOT reported as needed! Not covered in analysis
Community centres Women and girls centres Explosive hazard risk education Legal services for civil documentation Legal services for Housing, Land and Property issues
Psychosocial support services Psychosocial support for survivors of sexual violence/domestic violence Medical treatment for sexual/domestic violence survivors Protection services for children Recreational activities Care mechanisms for elderly persons Services for persons with disabilities
Protection services needed(Top 3 reported by most % communitiesin the sub-district)
iii. Map of top three protection services needed per sub-district (based on percentage of communities reporting need)
NOTE: The pie charts on the maps illustrate the top three options reported in the sub-district, based on the percentage of communities reporting eachoption as needed irrespective of presence. They are NOT indicative of the severity of need. In sub-districts where the pie chart shows more than threeoptions, it means that all displayed options were reported by the same percentage of communities. In sub-districts where the pie chart shows less thanthree options, it means that only displayed options were reported.
PROTECTION SERVICES NEEDED PER SUB-DISTRICT
UNDOFadministered
area
QUNEITRA GOVERNORATE CONCERNS WITH HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE
8. CONCERNS/PROBLEMS DURING DELIVERY OF HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE
i. Analysis coverage
a. Across population groups (For categories which required aggregation, highest frequency was adopted)
ii. Number of covered communities reporting concerns reg. the way humanitarian assistance was delivered in the last 3 monthsby frequency of occurrence
Number of communities covered by the analysis and number of communities reporting concerns regarding how humanitarian assistance was delivered in the last three months (by occurrence)
19 18 18
19 18 18
17 15
4 3 1 -0
19
Assistance given is not what thecommunity needs
Request for civil documentation toaccess assistance
Discrimination/exclusion Request of sexual favour/exploitation in exchange for
humanitarian assistance
Sexual harassment Humanitarian assistance is notfree/ Money is asked in exchange
for assistance
Covered in the analysis Reported as occurring (at least sometimes) Number of communities in the Governoratereporting concerns with humanitarian assistance
YES (concerns with humanitarian
assistance are reported as
occurring), 19 , 59%
NO (concerns with humanitarian
assistance are not reported as
occurring) 13 , 41%
1 1 1- - -
4 6
2
- - -
12
8
1
3 1 -
Assistance given is not what thecommunity needs
Request for civil documentationto access assistance
Discrimination/exclusion Request of sexual favour/exploitation in exchange for
humanitarian assistance
Sexual harassment Humanitarian assistance is notfree/ Money is asked inexchange for assistance
Very common issue Common issue Sometimes
QUNEITRA GOVERNORATE CONCERNS WITH HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE
ii. Number of covered communities reporting concerns reg. the way humanitarian assistance was delivered in the last 3 months by frequency of occurrence - contd
Humanitarian assistance is not free/ Money is asked in exchange for assistance
Request of sexual favour/ exploitation in exchange for humanitarian assistance
b. By population groups
Request for civil documentation to access assistance Sexual harassment
iii. Number of covered communities having reported discrimination as a concern reg. the way humanitarian assistance was delivered in the last three months identifying population groups affected by discrimination
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
-
-
-
-
Old persons
Divorced women
Women living alone
Unaccompanied girls
Widows
Unaccompanied boys
Men living alone
Girls head of household
Persons with disabilities (HA)
Boys head of household
Women head of household
- - - -- - - -- - - -
Boys Girls Men Women
1 1 1 1
6 5 6 6
7 8 8 8
Boys Girls Men Women
- - - -- - - --
2
-
3
Boys Girls Men Women
- - - -- - - -
1 1
-
1
Boys Girls Men Women
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
QUNEITRA
DARA
RURALDAMASCUS
J O R D A N
L E B A N O N
Izra
Jasim
Hrak
NawaSheikhMiskineTassil
As-Sanamayn
Ghabagheb
Dara
KherbetGhazala
Ash-ShajaraDael
Mzeireb
Qatana
Sasa
Bait Jan Kisweh
Fiq
Al-Butayhah
Quneitra
KhanArnaba
Al-Khashniyyeh
Masaada
Communities where concerns with delivery of humanitarian assistance are! Reported! NOT reported! Not covered in analysis
Assistance given is not what the community needs Request for civil documentation to access assistance Humanitarian assistance is not free/ Money is asked in exchange for assistance Request of sexual favour/ exploitation in exchange for humanitarian assistance Sexual harassmentDiscrimination/exclusion
Concerns with delivery of humanitarian assistance(Top 3 reported by most % communitiesin the sub-district)
iv. Map of top three concerns with delivery of humanitarian assistance in the last three months per sub-district (based on percentage ofcommunities reporting occurrence)
NOTE: The pie charts on the maps illustrate the top three options reported in the sub-district, based on the percentage of communities reporting eachoption as occurring sometimes or more. They are NOT indicative of the frequency/severity of occurrence. In sub-districts where the pie chart showsmore than three options, it means that all displayed options were reported by the same percentage of communities. In sub-districts where the pie chartshows less than three options, it means that only displayed options were reported.
CONCERNS WITH DELIVERY OF HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE PER SUB-DISTRICT
QUNEITRA GOVERNORATE CIVIL DOCUMENTATION
9. CIVIL DOCUMENTATION
a. Reasons for not having civil documentation
b. Type of document that is not possible to be obtained in the community
c. Impact of not having civil documentation
i. Percentage of communities identifying a specific impact of not having civil documents, out of those reporting the occurrence of lack/loss of civil documentation
i. Percentage of communities identifying a specific document that was not possible to obtain in the community, out of those reporting the occurrence of lack/loss of civil documentation
i. Percentage of communities identifying a specific reason for not having civil documentation, out of those reporting the occurrence of lack/loss of civil documentation
98%
88%
83%
61%
59%
59%
51%
49%
39%
34%
20%
Could not afford it
GoS Services not available
Concerns of approaching authority
Expired document
Lost
Left behind when fleeing
Didn’t attempt to obtain it
Counselling/legal services not available
Confiscated
Never had it
Another family member has possession of it
100%
100%
90%
90%
90%
88%
88%
88%
88%
88%
88%
88%
85%
Travel authorisation document
Deed/Tabou
Approval for lease agreement
Marriage Certificate
Disability ID
Death Certificate
Divorce record
Civil record (extract)
Birth Certificate
Family Booklet
Syrian ID
Passport
Residence support document
100%
98%
59%
56%
49%
46%
37%
Cannot register birth/marriage/death
Cannot register land/access transactions
Cannot claim property
Restricted freedom of movement
Unable to access basic services
Unable to access humanitarian assistance
Arrest
YES (lack/loss of
documentation is reported as occurring)
41 , 93%
NO (lack/loss of documentation is not reported
as occurring) 3 , 7%
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
QUNEITRA
DARA
RURALDAMASCUS
J O R D A N
L E B A N O N
Izra
Jasim
Hrak
NawaSheikhMiskineTas s il
As-Sanamayn
Ghabag heb
Dara
KherbetGhazala
Ash-ShajaraDael
Mzeireb
QatanaSasa
Bait JanKisweh
Fiq
Al-Bu tayhah
Qu neitra
KhanArnaba
Al-Khashniyyeh
Masaada
NOTE: The pie charts on the maps illu s trate the top three options reported in the s u b-dis trict, based on the percentag e of commu nities reporting eachoption as occu rring sometimes or more. They are NOT indicative of the frequ ency/severity of occu rrence. In s u b-dis tricts where the pie chart s howsmore than three options, it means that all displayed options were reported by the same percentag e of commu nities. In s u b-dis tricts where the pie chartshows les s than three options, it means that only displayed options were reported.
d. Map of top three reasons for not having civil documentation, per sub-district (based on percentage of communities reporting occurrence)
Communities where lack/loss of civil documentation is! Reported! NOT reported! Not covered in analysis
Concerns of approaching au thorityGoS Services not av ailableCou ns elling /leg al serv ices not av ailableNever had it
Didn’t attempt to obtain itAnother family member has pos s es s ion of itExpired docu mentCou ld not afford itConfiscatedLeft behind when fleeingLos t
Reasons for not havingcivil documentation(Top 3 reported by most % communities in the sub-district)
REASONS FOR NOT HAVING CIVIL DOCUMENTATION PER SUB-DISTRICT
NOTE: The pie charts on the maps illustrate the top three options reported in the sub-district, based on the percentage of communities reporting eachoption as occurring sometimes or more. They are NOT indicative of the frequency/severity of occurrence. In sub-districts where the pie chart showsmore than three options, it means that all displayed options were reported by the same percentage of communities. In sub-districts where the pie chartshows less than three options, it means that only displayed options were reported.
ii. Map of top three types of documents that are not possible to obtain in the community, per sub-district (based on percentage ofcommunities reporting occurrence)
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
QUNEITRA
DARA
RURALDAMASCUS
J O R D A N
L E B A N O N
Fiq
Al-Butayhah
Quneitra
KhanArnaba
Al-Khashniyyeh
Masaada
Izra
Jasim
Hrak
Nawa SheikhMiskine
Tassil
As-SanamaynMasmiyyeh
Ghabagheb
Dara
KherbetGhazala
Ash-ShajaraDael
Mzeireb
Mseifra
Qatana
Sasa
Bait Jan Kisweh
Birth CertificateCivil record (extract)Marriage Certificate
Divorce recordFamily BookletDeath CertificateDisability IDSyrian ID
PassportTravel authorisation documentApproval for lease agreementDeed/TabouResidence support document
Communities where lack/loss of civil documention is! Reported! NOT reported! Not covered in analysis
Types of documentsthat are not possibleto obtain (Top 3 reportedby most % communitiesin the sub-district)
TYPES OF DOCUMENTS NOT POSSIBLE TO OBTAIN PER SUB-DISTRICT
SEUSSI YTREPORP DNA DNAL ,GNISUOHETARONREVOG ARTIENUQ
10. HOUSING, LAND AND PROPERTY ISSUES
a.Concerns regarding Housing, land and property (HLP)
ii. Map of top three HLP concerns per sub-district (based on percentage of communities reporting occurrence)NOTE: The pie charts on the maps illustrate the top three options reported in the sub-district, based on the percentage of communities reporting each option as occurring sometimes or more. They are NOT indicative of the frequency/severity of occurrence. In sub-districts where the pie chart shows more than three options, it means that all displayed options were reported by the same percentage of communities. In sub-districts where the pie chart shows less than three options, it means that only displayed options were reported.
i. Percentage of communities, identifying specific HLP concerns, by frequency of occurrence, out of those reporting the occurrence of HLP issues.
0.0%5.6%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0%5.6% 5.6% 0.0% 0.0%
11% 0% 6% 6%17% 11%
0%0% 6%
78%
33%
61%71%
67% 72%78%
41%44%
11%
61%
33% 24% 17% 11% 17%
59% 50%
Damage of landor property
Looting of privateproperty
Property isunlawfully
occupied byothers
Disputedownership
Rental disputes(landlord/tenant
problems)
No housingavailable
Lack ofdocuments
Rules andprocesses on
housing and landnot clear orchanging
Cannotaccess/lost
access housingbecause can
afford it
Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens
YES (HLP issues are reported as occurring),
18 , 41%NO (HLP
issues are not reported as occurring), 26 , 59%
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
QUNEITRA
DARA
RURALDAMASCUS
Izra
Jasim
Hrak
NawaSheikhMiskineTassil
As-Sanamayn
Masmiyyeh
Ghabagheb
Dara
KherbetGhazala
Ash-ShajaraDael
Mzeireb
Mseifra
Qatana
Sasa
Bait Jan Kisweh
J O R D A N
L E B A N O N
Fiq
Al-Butayhah
Quneitra
KhanArnaba
Al-Khashniyyeh
Masaada
Lack of documents
Damage of land or property
Looting of private property
No housing available
Disputed ownership
Rental disputes (landlord/tenant problems)
Property is unlawfully occupied by others
Rules and processes on housing and land not clear or changing
Cannot access/lost access housing because can afford it
Housing, land and propertyconcerns (Top 3 reportedby most % communitiesin the sub-district)
Communities where HLP issues are! Reported! NOT reported! Not covered in analysis
HOUSING, LAND AND PROPERTY CONCERNS PER SUB-DISTRICT