quest study: follow-up of primary hiv infection subjects on long-term art randomized to therapeutic...

16
QUEST study: Follow-up of primary HIV infection subjects on long-term ART randomized to therapeutic immunization versus placebo at one year post-stopping treatment S Kinloch-de Loes, F C Lampe, L Perrin, D Cooper, B Hoen, L Goh, J Andersson, A Sonnerberg, D Smith C Tsoukas, B Autran, R El Habib, G Theofan, A N Phillips for the QUEST study group

Upload: marvin-terry

Post on 02-Jan-2016

215 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: QUEST study: Follow-up of primary HIV infection subjects on long-term ART randomized to therapeutic immunization versus placebo at one year post-stopping

QUEST study: Follow-up of primary HIV infection subjects on long-term

ART randomized to therapeutic immunization versus placebo at one

year post-stopping treatment

S Kinloch-de Loes, F C Lampe, L Perrin, D Cooper, B Hoen, L Goh, J Andersson, A Sonnerberg,

D Smith C Tsoukas, B Autran, R El Habib, G Theofan, A N Phillips for the QUEST study group

Page 2: QUEST study: Follow-up of primary HIV infection subjects on long-term ART randomized to therapeutic immunization versus placebo at one year post-stopping

Background

It is unclear whether therapeutic immunization can increase virological control in the long-term after discontinuation of ART initiated in acute HIV infection.

The rationale for such an intervention includes the absence of chronic immunosuppression, limited reservoirs of integrated proviral DNA and the potential for preservation of HIV-specific T cell responses. Therapeutic immunization may further boost these immune responses which tend to decrease with long-term ART.

Page 3: QUEST study: Follow-up of primary HIV infection subjects on long-term ART randomized to therapeutic immunization versus placebo at one year post-stopping

Background

The QUEST trial assessed the impact of therapeutic immunization of two vaccines in addition to ART versus ART alone on HIV plasma viremia (VL) 24 weeks after treatment interruption, in subjects who had initiated ART (Combivir®-abacavir-amprenavir bd) at the time of primary HIV infection (PHI).

Page 4: QUEST study: Follow-up of primary HIV infection subjects on long-term ART randomized to therapeutic immunization versus placebo at one year post-stopping

Quest Study Design

The QUEST study design is shown in Figure 1.

PHI subjects (n=79) on chronic ART for >72 weeks were randomized to one of three arms:

Arm A: ART + vaccine placeboArm B: ART + ALVAC-HIV vCP1452 Arm C: ART + ALVAC-HIV vCP1452 + Remune™

After 24 weeks subjects discontinued ART. Subjects were followed with regular laboratory and clinical monitoring for an additional 24 weeks when the primary end-point was measured (percentage of subjects with plasma VL < 1000 HIV copies/mL).

Page 5: QUEST study: Follow-up of primary HIV infection subjects on long-term ART randomized to therapeutic immunization versus placebo at one year post-stopping

Week24 STOP ART

>72 weeks HAART: durable viremia

<50c/mL

HAART

+ Placebo vaccines

HAART + Alvac HIV vCP 1452 + Placebo

Remune™

HAART + Alvac vCP 1452

+ Remune™

PHIQuadruple HAART

(n = 79)

Randomisation

W0 W4 W8 W12 W16 W20

Rm Rm Rm Rm VCP VCP VCP VCPRm = Remune™

VCP = ALVAC-HIV vCP1452

Figure 1. Quest Study Design

Page 6: QUEST study: Follow-up of primary HIV infection subjects on long-term ART randomized to therapeutic immunization versus placebo at one year post-stopping

Quest findings at 24 weeks post-stopping

Results at week 24 post-stopping ART showed:

• No difference in the percentage of subjects with viral load <1000 HIV copies(c)/mL between the pooled ART+ vaccine arms (B/C) and the ART+ placebo vaccine arm (A) [primary efficacy endpoint].

• Immunogenicity in vaccine arms by IFN-gamma CD4 and CD8 ELISPOT analysis at the end of the immunization phase.

• Absence of correlation between immunogenicity at the end of the immunisation phase and viremia levels at week 24 post-stopping ART.

Page 7: QUEST study: Follow-up of primary HIV infection subjects on long-term ART randomized to therapeutic immunization versus placebo at one year post-stopping

Objective

The Quest cohort has been followed up since assessment of the primary endpoint at 24 weeks post-stopping ART (DSMB recommendation).

The follow-up will assess the impact of our therapeutic strategy on VL, CD4, ART use and clinical events in the longer term. The current analysis extends the follow-up of the 79 randomised patients to 48 weeks post-stopping ART.

Page 8: QUEST study: Follow-up of primary HIV infection subjects on long-term ART randomized to therapeutic immunization versus placebo at one year post-stopping

Individualized forms sent to enrolling centers in Europe, Canada and Australia recorded patient status, laboratory parameters (viral load and CD4 count), antiretroviral treatment details and clinical AIDS-defining events.

Data analysis was performed centrally (Royal Free and University College Medical School, London).

Methods

Page 9: QUEST study: Follow-up of primary HIV infection subjects on long-term ART randomized to therapeutic immunization versus placebo at one year post-stopping

Proportions of subjects with VL 1000 HIV-1 copies/mL at week 48 post-stopping ART were assessed and compared between arms A and B/C using Fishers exact test and an intention to treat approach (subjects with missing VL, those who did not stop ART and those who restarted ART were classified as failure).

Absolute values of VL and CD4 count at week 48 post-stopping ART were compared between arms A and B/C using the Mann-Whitney test. Subjects with missing values and those who restarted treatment were included using ‘last observation carried forward’, providing this was at least 28 days after stopping ART.

Methods

Page 10: QUEST study: Follow-up of primary HIV infection subjects on long-term ART randomized to therapeutic immunization versus placebo at one year post-stopping

Results

Follow-up information was received for 60 of 79 patients.

No deaths or AIDS events were reported.

Table 1 shows numbers of patients who did not stop ART, restarted ART and had missing information at weeks 24 and 48 post-stopping ART.

Overall, 15 subjects restarted ART prior to week 48. Last VL (c/mL) prior to ART-restart was: 50 (n=1); 10,000-100,000 (n=2); >100,000 (n=12).

No significant differences were found between arms A and B/C for numbers restarting ART, primary VL end-point (Table 2), or median VL and CD4 count at week 48 post-stopping ART (Table 3).

Page 11: QUEST study: Follow-up of primary HIV infection subjects on long-term ART randomized to therapeutic immunization versus placebo at one year post-stopping

Table 1. Patient status

Week 24 post-stop ART Week 48 post-stop ART

Total Arm A Arm B/C Total Arm A Arm B/C

Number of patients

randomised79 27 52 79 27 52

Number did not stop ART

1 0 1 1 0 1

Number restarted ART

8 3 5 15 4 11

Number missing endpoint VL

4 1 3 17 10 7

Total number automatic failure

13 4 9 33 14 19

Number with endpoint VL

66 23 43 46 13 33

Page 12: QUEST study: Follow-up of primary HIV infection subjects on long-term ART randomized to therapeutic immunization versus placebo at one year post-stopping

Table 2. VL distribution and primary endpoint

Week 24 post-stop ART Week 48 post-stop ART

VL c/mL; n (%) Total Arm A Arm B/C Total Arm A Arm B/C

< 50 4 (5.1) 3 (11.1) 1 (1.9) 2 (2.5) 1 (3.7) 1 (1.9)

51 - 1000 10 (12.7) 3 (11.1) 7 (13.5) 4 (5.1) 1 (3.7) 3 (5.8)

1001 – 10,000 22 (27.9) 7 (25.9) 15 (28.9) 14 (17.7) 1 (3.7) 13 (25.0)

10,000 – 100,000 22 (27.9) 8 (29.6) 14 (26.9) 20 (25.3) 8 (29.6) 12 (23.1)

> 100,000 8 (10.1) 2 (7.4) 6 (11.5) 6 (7.6) 2 (7.4) 4 (7.7)

Did not stop /Restarted/Missing 13 (16.5) 4 (14.8) 9 (17.3) 33 (41.8) 14 (51.9) 19 (36.5)

Primary endpoint (VL < 1000c/mL without restarting ART, M=F)

14/79

(17.7%)

6/27

(22.2 %)

8/52

(15.4%)

6/79

(7.6 %)

2/27

(7.4 %)

4/52

(7.7 %)

A vs B/C P = 0.54 P = 0.99

Page 13: QUEST study: Follow-up of primary HIV infection subjects on long-term ART randomized to therapeutic immunization versus placebo at one year post-stopping

Table 3. Median VL and CD4 count

Week 24 post-stop ART Week 48 post-stop ART

Total Arm A Arm B/C Total Arm A Arm B/C

VL (c/ml)

N

Median

IQR

Range

76

4.0

3.2, 4.8

1.7, 6.5

27

3.9

3.0, 4.9

1.7, 6.5

49

4.2

3.4, 4.8

1.7, 5.9

76

4.4

3.3, 5.0

1.7, 6.5

27

4.3

3.3, 5.0

1.7, 6.5

49

4.4

3.9, 5.0

1.7, 5.9

A vs B/C P=0.60 P=0.51

CD4 (/mm³)

NMedian

IQR

Range

75

644

505, 773

330,1284

26

656

520, 739

342,1051

49

625

495, 773

330, 1284

75

613

467, 739

312,1352

26

616

488,739

342,1180

49

613

451,736

312,1352

A vs B/C P=0.74 P=0.84

Using ‘last observation carried forward’ if at least 28 days after stopping ART

Page 14: QUEST study: Follow-up of primary HIV infection subjects on long-term ART randomized to therapeutic immunization versus placebo at one year post-stopping

Conclusion

The safety of our intervention was demonstrated by the preservation of CD4 counts and the absence of deaths or AIDS events in subjects who initiated ART at PHI with or without the addition of therapeutic immunization and later interrupted ART. The re-initiation of ART during this additional follow-up occurred mainly because of high VL.

The proportions of subjects fulfilling the primary efficacy end-point (<1000 c/mL) decreased at week 48 compared to week 24 post-stopping ART, with no major impact of immunization on VL or CD4 count over the present follow-up period.

 

Page 15: QUEST study: Follow-up of primary HIV infection subjects on long-term ART randomized to therapeutic immunization versus placebo at one year post-stopping

References

1. Rosenberg ES et al. Science.1997;278:1447-50.2. Oxenius A et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:3382-7.3. Altfeld M et al. J Exp Med. 2001;193:169-80.4. Kinloch-de Loes S et al. J Infect Dis 2005; 192: 607-17.

Page 16: QUEST study: Follow-up of primary HIV infection subjects on long-term ART randomized to therapeutic immunization versus placebo at one year post-stopping

AcknowledgementsQuest Study Group: Recruiting centres: Australia: M. Bloch (Holdsworth House General Practice, Darlinghurst, New South Wales), D Baker (407 Doctors Clinic, Surry Hills, Sydney NSW 2010), R Finlayson (Taylor Square Private Clinic, Surry Hills, Sydney NSW 2010), P Grey, D Smith, D Cooper (National Centre in HIV Epidemiology and Clinical Research, Sydney). Belgium: Ph Hermanns, K Kabeya, N Clumeck (Department of Infectious Diseases, St Pierre Hospital, Brussels). Canada: M Harris, J Montaner (John Ruedy Immune Deficiency Clinic, St Paul’s Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver), C Tsoukas (Immune Deficiency Treatment Centre, Montreal General Hospital, Montreal). France: B Hoen (Department of Infectious Diseases, Besancon University Hospital, Besancon), P M Girard (Department of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, Rothschild Hospital, Paris), J Modai (Department of Infectious Disease St Louis Hospital, Paris), Ph Canton, T May (Department of Infectious Diseases, CHU Nancy, Vandoeuvres-les-Nancy), D Sereni (Department of Internal Medicine, St Louis Hospital, Paris), C Katlama (Department of Infectious Diseases, Pitié-Salpetrière Hospital, Paris). Germany: S Staszewski (Klinikum der JW Goethe Universitat. Zentrum der Inneren Medizin, Frankfurt), H J Stellbrink (Medizinische Poliklinik, Universitatsklinikum Eppendorf, Hamburg). Italy: G Tambussi, A Lazzarin (Clinic of Infectious Diseases, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan). Sweden: H Gaines, S Lindback, A Blaxhult (Department of Infectious Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm). Switzerland: M C Bernard, B Hirschel, L Perrin (Division of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital, Geneva), K Wolf, M Battegay (Division of Infectious Diseases, Basle University Hospital, Basle), P Vernazza (DIM, Kantonsspital, St Gallen), R Weber (Department fur Innere Medizin, Zurich). UK: S Kinloch, T Drinkwater, Z Cuthbertson, P Byrne, M Youle, M Tyrer, S Bhagani, M A Johnson (Ian Charleson Centre, Royal Free Hospital, London), C Higgs, D Hawkins, B Gazzard (Kobler Centre, Chelsea & Westminster Hospital, London), A. Friedman (University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff), M Fisher (Claude Nicol Centre Research Department, Royal Sussex Country Hospital, Brighton).

GlaxoSmithKline QUEST Team (Greenford, UK): V Mallet, S Turkish, S Fortes, H Maseruka, H Steel, D Thorborn, H McDade, L E Goh.

GlaxoSmithKline monitors: Australia (M Haberl, J Young); Belgium (D Luyts, I van Steenberg); Canada (S Pratt, T Russell); France (L Beauvais, J M Vauthier); Germany (M Sikora); Italy (C Gussetti, C M Anghileri, V Piva, D Fendt); Sweden (G Larsson); Switzerland (C Python, I Schauwecker, E Gremlich); UK (K Studdard, P Humphreys, U Loughrey).

The Immune Response Corporation: (Carlsbad, California, USA) - R Moss, G Theofan.Aventis Pasteur (Lyon, France) - D Blanc, C di Vita, V Mazarin, B Mouterde, R El-Habib.DSMB - M Schechter (Canada), I Weller (United Kingdom), R Luethy (Switzerland), J M Molina (France).

Quest Core Group: S Kinloch, D Cooper, L Perrin, B Hoen, A Sonnerborg, C Tsoukas, J Andersson, F C Lampe, A N Phillips, B Autran.

Statistical analysis: F C Lampe, N Carter, A N Phillips.

Data management: J Puradiredja

Roche Molecular Systems (Alameida, CA, USA): B Dale, A Capt.

Laboratory support: L Wegmann, S Yerly, L Perrin (Laboratory of Virology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland). A Samri, B Autran (Cellular and Tissue Immunology Laboratory, Inserm U543, Pitié-Salpetrière Hospital, Paris, France). J Zaunders, P Cunningham, A Kelleher (Centre for Immunology, St Vincent’s Hospital, NCHECR, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia). S Martins, G Janossy (HIV Immunology Laboratory, Department of Immunology and Molecular Pathology, Royal Free and University College Medical School, London, UK). A L Spetz, J Andersson (Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden). G Tambussi, A Lazzarin, A Galli (Clinic of Infectious Diseases, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy).