quantum chemical calculations and spectroscopic...
TRANSCRIPT
190
Chapter – VI
Structural and vibrational studies of 1, 5-dimethoxynaphthalene:
A spectroscopic approach
182
CHAPTER VI
STRUCTURAL AND VIBRATIONAL STUDIES OF 1,5-
DIMETHOXYNAPHTHALENE : A SPECTROSCOPIC
APPROACH
ABSTRACT
In this work, we reported a combined experimental and theoretical
study on molecular structure, vibrational spectra and NBO analysis of
1,5-dimethoxynaphthalene. The optimized molecular structure, atomic
charges, vibrational frequencies and natural bond orbital analysis of
1,5-dimethoxynaphthalene have been studied by performing DFT/B3LYP/6-
31G(d,p) level of theory. The FTIR, FT-Raman spectra were recorded in the
region 4000-400 cm-1
and 3500-50 cm-1
respectively. The scaled
wavenumbers are compared with the experimental values. The difference
between the observed and scaled wavenumber values of most of the
fundamentals is very small. The formation of hydrogen bond was investigated
in terms of the charge density by the NBO calculations. Besides, molecular
electrostatic potential (MEP), frontier molecular orbitals (FMO) analysis were
investigated using theoretical calculations.
183
CHAPTER VI
STRUCTURAL AND VIBRATIONAL STUDIES OF 1,5-
DIMETHOXYNAPHTHALENE : A SPECTROSCOPIC
APPROACH
6.1. INTRODUCTION
Naphthalene is the simplest and the most important member of this
class of arenas, in which two benzene rings are fused in ortho positions.
Naphthalene, a benzenoid polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH), is found
in both middle and heavy oil fractions at crude oil and is obtained by
fractional crystallization. The naphthalene and its derivatives are the most
important class of organic compounds. Because of their spectroscopic
properties and chemical significance, naphthalene and its derivatives were
studied extensively by spectroscopic and theoretical methods. Naphthalene
has been identified as new range of potent antimicrobials effective against
wide range of human pathogens. It is also used in the production of dye and
plastics. Several naphthalene containing drugs are available, such as
nafacillin, naftifine, tolnaftate, terbinafine, etc. which play a vital role in the
control of microbial infection. It is widely recognized that polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons and their metabolites are among the most toxic, carcinogenic
and mutagenic atmospheric contaminants [1-4]. Naphthalene and its
184
derivatives are widely used as the chemical intermediate, wetting agent in
many industrial applications, to study heat transfer with mass sublimation in
engineering field, household fumigants such as mothballs, fumigant
pesticides. Exposure to large amounts of naphthalene may damage or destroy
red blood cells and cause confusion, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, blood in the
urine, jaundice [5]. PAHs can be produced from both natural and human
activities as a result of incomplete combustion or pyrolysis, and there is a
clear evidence of the presence of PAHs in many astronomical objects [6-8].
Recent research showed that the protonated cations of naphthalene are the
source of part of the spectrum of the unidentified interstellar bands (UIBs)
[9]. Naphthalene and alkylated naphthalenes are semi-volatile, present in the
atmosphere mostly in the gas phase [10]. Diesel fuel contains PAHs including
methylnaphthalene and dimethylnaphthalenes [11, 12]. Especially,
naphthalene was studied because of its technological applications in a vast
amount of industrial process [13].
The molecule 1,5-dimethoxynaphthalene is a compound having two
methoxy groups are substituted to naphthalene ring system. There are
positional isomers differing by the location of the methoxy group. The
different positions provide various chemical structures which offer important
roles to each characteristic. Librando and Alparone [14, 15] investigated
methyl naphthalene isomers based on quantum mechanical approach and the
electronic polarizability of dimethylnaphthalenes. Srivastava and Singh [16]
185
investigated the infrared and Raman spectrum of Naphthalene and its cation.
Das et al. [17] reported the infrared spectra of dimethylnaphthalenes in the
gas phase. The vibrational analysis using DFT method of naphthoic acid, 2-
naphthoic acid, bromo naphthoic acid, 1-naphthaldehyde, 1,5-
dinitronaphthalene and 1-hydroxynaphthalene have been extensively studied
and analyzed [13, 18, 19]. Krishnakumar et al. [20] reported the vibrational
assignments in 1-naphthyl acetic acid. Recently, Nagabalasubramanian et al.
reported a scaled quantum mechanical vibrational analysis on 1,5-
methylnaphthalene using FTIR and FT-Raman spectra [21]. Molecular
structure, anharmonic vibrational frequencies and NBO analysis of
naphthalene acetic acid by DFT calculations were carried out by Kavitha et al.
[22]. Xavier et al. [23] investigated the 1-methoxynapthalene by using
Wilson’s F-G matrix method.
Most recently, Govindarajan et al. [24] investigated the FTIR and
FT-Raman spectra of 1-methoxynapthalene. In this work, structural
parameters, vibrational assignments, electronic absorption and frontier
molecular orbital energies were calculated for 1-methoxynapthalene.
Nagabalasubramanian et al. [25] studied the FTIR, FT-Raman, ab initio and
DFT structural, vibrational frequency and HOMO–LUMO analysis of
1-naphthaleneacetic acid methyl ester. Potential energy surface scan, mulliken
atomic charges and thermodynamic properties were also carried out for 1-
naphthaleneacetic acid methyl ester. Shoba et al. [26, 27] reported the FTIR
186
and FT-Raman vibrational analysis, ab initio HF and DFT analysis of
isocyanic acid 1-naphthyl ester and 2,3-naphthalenediol. Here, geometrical
parameters, vibrational assignments, thermodynamic properties, HOMO-
LUMO analysis and UV-Vis spectra analysis were made for isocyanic acid 1-
naphthyl ester and 2,3-naphthalenediol.
Spectroscopic (FTIR and FT Raman) analysis and vibrational study on
2, 3-dimethyl naphthalene were made by Prabhu et al. [28]. Molecular
structure, polarizability, hyperpolarizability analysis and spectroscopic
characterization of 1-(chloromethyl)-2-methylnaphthalene were carried out by
Nagabalasubramanian et al. [29]. Ostojić and Ðorđević [30] studied the ab
initio and density functional study of barrier heights for methyl group torsion
and conformational deformability in 1, 4, 6-trimethylnaphthalene.
Govindarajan and Karabacak have reported the FTIR, FT-Raman and UV
spectral investigation, computed frequency estimation analysis and electronic
structure calculations on 1-nitronaphthalene [31]. To the best of our
knowledge, neither quantum chemical calculation, nor the vibrational spectra
of 1, 5-dimethoxynaphthalene have been reported. Therefore, the present
work aims to provide a complete description on the molecular geometry,
molecular vibrations and electronic features of the 1,5-dimethoxynaphthalene
molecule.
187
6.2. EXPERIMENTAL DETAILS
The compound 1,5-dimethoxynaphthalene was purchased from Sigma-
Aldrich Chemical Company with a stated purity greater than 98% and it was
used as such without further purification. The FTIR spectrum of the sample was
carried out between 4000 cm-1
and 400 cm-1
on an IFS 66V spectrometer using
the KBr pellet technique. The room temperature, FT-Raman spectrum was
recorded using a Thermo Electron Corporation model Nexus 670
spectrophotometer equipped with FT-Raman module accessory. The 1064 nm
line of an Nd-YAG laser was used as excitation wavelength in the region of
3500-50 cm-1
. The spectral resolution was set to 4 cm-1
in a back scattering
mode. A liquid nitrogen cooled Ge detector was used to collect 50 scans for a
good Raman spectrum. The laser output was kept at 150 mW for the solid
samples. The experimental FTIR and FT-Raman spectra along with the
theoretically predicted IR and Raman spectra using DFT/B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) level
of calculations are shown in Figs. 6.1 and 6.2.
6.3. COMPUTATIONAL DETAILS
In the present study, the density functional theory (DFT/B3LYP) at the
6-31G(d,p) basis set level was adopted to calculate the optimized parameters
and vibrational wavenumbers of the normal modes of the title molecule. All
the theoretical calculations were performed using the Gaussian 03W program
package [32] with the default convergence criteria, without any constraint on
the geometry [33]. The equilibrium geometry corresponding to the true
188
Tra
nsm
itta
nce
(%
) T
ransm
itta
nce
(%
)
B 3 L Y P / 6 - 3 1 G ( d , p )
4000 500
E x p e r i m e n t a l
4 0 0 0 3 5 0 0 3 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 5 0 0
W a v e n u m b e r ( c m -1
)
Fig. 6.1: Comparison of experimental and theoretical (B3LYP/6-31G(d,p))
FTIR spectra for 1,5-dimethoxynaphthalene
189
W a v e n u m b e r ( c m - 1
)
Ram
an I
nte
nsi
ty (
arb u
nit
s)
Ram
an I
nte
nsi
ty (
arb u
nit
s)
B3LYP/6-31G(d,p)
4000 500
E x p e r i m e n t a l
3 5 0 0 3 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 5 0 0
Wavenumber (cm-1
)
Fig. 6.2: Comparison of experimental and theoretical (B3LYP/6-31G(d,p)) FT-
Raman spectra for 1,5-dimethoxynaphthalene
190
i
minimum on the potential energy surface (PES) was effectively obtained by
solving self-consistent field equation. The vibrational spectra of the 1,5-
dimethoxynaphthalene were obtained by taking the second derivative the
energy, computed analytically. The optimized structural parameters were used
in the vibrational frequency calculations at DFT levels to characterize all
stationary points as minima using the GAUSSVIEW animation program [34].
Vibrational frequencies were computed at DFT level which had reliable one-
to-one correspondence to experimental IR and Raman frequencies [35]. The
vibrational assignments of the normal modes were made on the basis of the
TED calculated by using the VEDA 4 program [36]. Subsequent total energy
distribution (TED) to each observed frequencies, predicts well the purity of the
fundamental modes and shows the reliability and accuracy of the spectral
analysis. In the present study, we have used the following scaling factor of
0.9608 for B3LYP/6-31G (d, p) method [37]. A comparison of the frequencies
calculated with the experimental values revealed that the 6-31G (d, p) basis set
result shows very good agreement with the experimental observations.
6.4. PREDICTION OF RAMAN INTENSITIES
The Raman activities (SRa) calculated with Gaussian 03 program [32]
converted to relative Raman intensities (IRa) using the following relationship
derived from the intensity theory of Raman scattering [38, 39]
f (v − v ) 4
S I = o i i
v i [1 − exp( − hcv i / kt )]
………. (6.1)
191
where, ν0 is the laser exciting wavenumber in cm-1
(in this work, we have used
the excitation wavenumber ν0 = 9398.5 cm-1
, which corresponds to the
wavelength of 1064 nm of a Nd-YAG laser), νi the vibrational wavenumber
of the ith
normal mode (cm-1
) where as Si is the Raman scattering activity of
the normal mode νi. f (is a constant equal to 10-12
) is a suitably chosen
common normalization factor for all peak intensities. h, k, c and T are Planck
and Boltzmann constants, speed of light and temperature in Kelvin,
respectively. The calculated Raman and IR intensities were used to convolute
each predicted vibrational mode with a Lorentzian line shape with a full width
at half maximum (FWHM=10 cm-1
) to produce simulated spectra.
6.5. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
6.5.1. Molecular geometry
The most relevant structural parameters, bond lengths, bond angles and
dihedral angles of 1,5-dimethoxynaphthalene determined by Density
functional theoretical calculations with 6-31G(d,p) basis set are given in
Table 6.1. Geometry optimizations were carried out, without any symmetry
constraints; including polarization functions to correctly take into account
intramolecular H-bonding in the molecule. The atom numbering of
1,5-dimethoxynaphthalene molecule used in this paper is reported in Fig. 6.3.
To the best of our knowledge the experimental data on the geometric structure
of the title molecule is not available till now in the literature. Due to this
192
Table 6.1: Calculated optimized parameter values of the 1, 5-dimethoxynaphthalene
[Bond length in (Å), angles in (º)]
Bond length B3LYP Bond angle B3LYP Dihedral angle B3LYP
C1-C2 1.381 C5-C6-C7 120.8 C10-C1-C2-C3 0.0 C1-C10 1.433 C5-C6-O11 114.8 C10-C1-C2-H15 -180.0
C1-O13 1.366 C7-C6-O11 124.4 O13-C1-C2-C3 -180.0
C2-C3 1.415 C6-C7-C8 119.9 O13-C1-C2-H15 0.0
C2-H15 1.083 C6-C7-H18 120.9 C2-C1-C10-C5 0.0
C3-C4 1.374 C8-C7-H18 119.2 C2-C1-C10-C9 180.0
C3-16 1.086 C7-C8-C9 121.3 O13-C1-C10-C5 180.0
C4-C5 1.420 C7-C8-H19 118.7 O13-C1-C10-C9 0.0
C4-H17 1.083 C9-C8-H19 120.0 C2-C1-O13-C14 0.0
C5-C6 1.433 C8-C9-C10 119.8 C10-C1-O13-C14 180.0
C5-C10 1.428 C8-C9-H20 121.1 C1-C2-C3-C4 0.0
C6-C7 1.381 C10-C9-H20 119.1 C1-C2-C3-H16 180.0
C6-O11 1.366 C1-C10-C5 118.1 H15-C2-C3-C4 -180.0
C7-C8 1.415 C1-C10-C9 121.8 H15-C2-C3-H16 0.0
C7-H18 1.083 C5-C10-C9 120.1 C2-C3-C4-C5 0.0
C8-C9 1.374 C6-O11-C12 118.3 C2-C3-C4-H17 180.0
C8-H19 1.086 O11-C12-H21 106.1 H16-C3-C4-C5 180.0
C9-C10 1.420 O11-C12-H22 111.6 H16-C3-C4-H17 0.0
C9-H20 1.083 O11-C12-H23 111.6 C3-C4-C5-C6 -180.0
O11-C12 1.418 H21-C12-H22 109.3 C3-C4-C5-C10 0.0
C12-H21 1.091 H21-C12-H23 109.3 H17-C4-C5-C6 0.0
C12-H22 1.098 H22-C12-H23 109.0 H17-C4-C5-C10 -180.0
C12-H23 1.098 C1-O13-C14 118.3 C4-C5-C6-C7 180.0
O13-C14 1.418 O13-C14-H24 106.1 C4-C5-C6-O11 0.0
C14-H24 1.091 O13-C14-H25 111.6 C10-C5-C6-C7 0.0
C14-H25 1.098 O13-C14-H26 111.6 C10-C5-C6-O11 180.0
C14-H26 1.098 H24-C14-H25 109.3 C4-C5-C10-C1 0.0
Bond angle H24-C14-H26 109.3 C4-C5-C10-C9 -180.0
C2-C1-C10 120.8 H25-C14-H26 109.0 C6-C5-C10-C1 -180.0
C2-C1-O13 124.4 Dihedral angle C6-C5-C10-C9 0.0
C10-C1-O13 114.8 C7-C8-C9-H20 180.0 C5-C6-C7-C8 0.0
C1-C2-C3 119.9 H19-C8-C9-C10 180.0 C5-C6-C7-H18 180.0
C1-C2-H15 120.9 H19-C8-C9-H20 0.0 O11-C6-C7-C8 -180.0
C3-C2-H15 119.2 C8-C9-C10-C1 -180.0 O11-C6-C7-H18 0.0
C2-C3-C4 121.3 C8-C9-C10-C5 0.0 C5-C6-O11-C12 180.0
C2-C3-H16 118.7 H20-C9-C10-C1 0.0 C7-C6-O11-C12 0.0
C4-C3-H16 120.0 H20-C9-C10-C5 180.0 C6-C7-C8-C9 0.0
C3-C4-C5 119.8 C6-O11-C12-H21 -180.0 C6-C7-C8-H19 -180.0
C3-C4-H17 121.1 C6-O11-C12-H22 61.1 H18-C7-C8-C9 -180.0
C5-C4-H17 119.1 C1-O13-C14-H25 61.1 H18-C7-C8-19 0.0
C4-C5-C6 121.8 C1-O13-C14-H26 -61.1 C7-C8-C9-C10 0.0
C4-C5-C10 120.1 C6-O11-C12-H23 -61.1 C6-C5-C10 118.1 C1-O13-C14-H24 -180.0
194
inadequacy, our optimized structural parameters are not compared with the
experimental data. The molecular structure of 1, 5-dimethoxynaphthalene
belongs to C1 point group symmetry. An account of bond length, bond angles
and dihedral angles the left part of the naphthalene ring almost reproduced the
right part as like as a mirror image, it is evident from the Fig. 6.3 and Table
6.1. The title compound was planar, as indicated by C6-C5-O11-C12 and
C10-C1-O13-C14 torsional angles of 180.0° and 180.0° respectively. The
methyl C-H bond distances longer than the aromatic C-H bond distances. An
interesting fact that occur both the methoxy group, among the three methyl C-
H bonds, one bond in the ring of the molecule is shorter than the other two
non-planar C-H bonds by angle 0.087Å. As it is evident from the bond
lengths of C1–C2 and C2–C10 is 1.381 and 1.430 Å, show slight deviation
when compared with C10–C9 and C9–C8 of 1.420 and 1.374 Å, and
symmetry of naphthalene ring is distorted, yielding ring angles smaller and
larger than the normal value of 120° exactly at the substitution as shown in
Table 6.1. The C2–C1–C10 angle is 120.8° and C8–C9–C10 angle is 119.8°.
There is an elongation calculated in the C-O bond length when it connected
with methyl group carbon atom than the ring carbon which has the values of
1.418 and 1.366 Å respectively.
6.5.2. Vibrational assignments
The observed (FTIR and FT-Raman) wavenumbers, calculated IR and
Raman intensities and assigned wavenumbers of vibrational modes calculated at
195
the B3LYP level using basis set 6-31G(d,p) along with their TED of 1,5-
dimethoxynaphthalene are depicted in Table 6.2. The vibrational spectrum is
mainly determined by the modes of the free molecule observed at higher
wavenumbers together with the lattice modes in the low wavenumbers region.
The aim of the vibrational analysis is to find vibrational modes connected with
specific molecular structures of calculated compound. The comparison of
experimental and theoretical FTIR and FT-Raman spectra are shown in Figs.
6.1 and 6.2. The DFT method predicts vibrational spectra with high accuracy
and is applicable to a large number of compounds, except for the cases where
the effect of dispersion forces is significant. Precise vibrational frequency
assignment for aromatic and other conjugated system is necessary for
characterization of compound. It should be noted that the calculations were
made for a free molecule in vacuum, while experiments were performed for
solid samples. With the assumed structural model, the molecule belongs to C1
point group symmetry and has 26 atoms with 72 normal modes of vibrations. In
order to facilitate assignment of the observed peaks, we have analyzed the
vibrational wavenumbers and compared our calculated values with the
experimental results.
6.5.2.1. C-H vibrations
The aromatic C-H stretching vibrations are normally found between
3100 and 3000 cm−1
due to aromatic C-H stretching vibrations [40-43]. The
wavenumbers calculated in the range 3107-3062 cm-1
by B3LYP
196
FTIR FT-
Unscaled Scale Raman
3360vs 3234 3107 3207w 3233 3107
3127s 308 2s 3224 3098
3224 3098
3055s 3187 3062
3187 3062
2984s 300 8s 3147 3024
3147 3024
2941s 2960w 3077 2957
2937w 3077 2957
2880w 3016 2898
2851w 2835w 3015 2897
1611w 1678 1612
1597w 1583vs 1649 1585
1541w 1638 1574
1495w 1562 1501
1470w 1466w 1522 1463
1519 1460
1453w 1512 1453
1446w 1504 1445
1504 1445
1497 1438
1414vs 1484 1426
1460 1403
1391w 1386vs 1447 1390
1344m 1420 1365
1321w 1383 1329
1274s 1301 1250
1244vs 1295 1244
1249 1200
1173m 1225 1177
1216 1168
1208 1160
1149w 1204 1157
1138vs 1186 1139
1179 1133
1102w 1179 1133
1080m 1124 1080
Table 6.2: Comparison of the experimental and calculated vibrational spectra
and proposed assignments of 1, 5-dimethoxynaphthalene
Mode Experimental
wavenumbers/cm-1
Theoretical wavenumbers/cm-1/
B3LYP/6-31G(d,p)
Vibrational assignments
nos.
d aIIR
bIRA with TED (≥10%)
1 0.00 69.22 υCH(93)
2 13.12 0 υCH(91) 3 27.95 0 υCH(93) 4 0.00 61.97 υCH(91) 5 0.00 65.87 υCH(92) 6 30.30 0 υCH(92) 7 0.00 69.84 υCH(91) 8 46.97 0 υCH(91) 9 82.93 0 υCH(98)
10 0.00 42.95 υCH(88) 11 0.00 100.01 υCH(81) 12 130.46 0 υCH(90) 13 0.00 16.24 υCC(62)+δCCC(11) 14 83.43 0 υCC(61) 15 0.00 127.5 υCC(64) 16 131.98 0 υCC(33) 17 0.00 34.85 ρHCH(49) 18 74.69 0 γCHOH(11) 19 0.00 39.02 υCC(15)+γCHOH(14)+υOC(11) 20 10.59 0.02 γCHOH(13) 21 0.00 81.88 γCHOH(13) 22 11.64 0 γCHOH(20) 23 0.00 6.43 γCHOH(27) 24 0.00 118.84 ηHCCC(57)+ ρHCH(31) 25 268.72 0 ηHCCC(38)+ ρHCH(43) 26 0.00 474.6 υCC(72) 27 7.68 0 υCC(19) 28 302.43 0 υOC(30) 29 0.00 4.7 υOC(49)+γCHOH(14) 30 33.94 0 υCC(53) 31 0.00 12.92 γCOCH(29) 32 34.36 0 γCHOH(32)+υCC(12) 33 0.00 27.49 γCHOH(26) 34 13.30 0 υCC(16)+γCHOH(11) 35 0.00 23.07 υCC(11) 36 1.66 0 γCHOH(85) 37 0.00 21.72 γCHOH(85) 38 203.20 0 υOC(57)
39 1112 1068 0.00 31.18 υCC(23)+υOC(18)
197
FTIR
Table 6.2 (Contd.): Comparison of the experimental and calculated vibrational
Spectra and proposed assignments of 1, 5-dimethoxynaphthalene
Mode Experimental
wavenumbers/cm-1
Theoretical wavenumbers/cm-1/
B3LYP/6-31G(d,p)
Vibrational assignments
nos. FT-
Raman Unscaled Scaled
aIIR
bIRA with TED (≥10%)
40 1040vs 1093 1050 58.39 0 υCC(57) 41 1055 1013 0.00 17.45 υOC(72) 42 963w 970 932 0.00 3.86 ηHCCC(81) 43 931w 969 931 1.28 0 ηHCCC(64) 44 862s 853m 891 856 16.16 0 υOC(25)+δCCC(12)+υCC(11) 45 880 845 0.00 15.37 ηHCCC(71) 46 879 844 1.93 0 ηHCCO(65)+ηHCCC(10) 47 839s 870 836 0.00 26.67 υCC(31) 48 825 793 0.00 9.23 ηCCCC(43)+ηHCCC(22) 49 793 762 89.27 0 ηHCCO(18)+ηHCCC(52) 50 754s 790 759 13.08 0 δCCC(70) 51 712s 741 712 0.00 24.2 ηHCCC(49)+ηCCCC(18) 52 685s 695 668 0.00 119.38 υCC(44) 53 655vs 686 659 3.33 0 ηCCCC(76) 54 611 587 18.92 0 δCOC(77) 55 602 578 1.06 0 ηCCCC(79) 56 535m 546 524 0.00 35.9 δCCC(26)+υCC(13) 57 534 513 0.00 23.09 ηCCCC(83) 58 524 503 6.54 0 δCCC(61) 59 478m 478 460 0.00 9.05 δCCC(60)+υCC(11) 60 456w 478 459 0.00 59.55 ηCCCC(58) 61 334s 357 343 1.72 0 δCCC(62) 62
63
335
315
322 0.00
303 0.00
175.46 δCOC(46)+υCC(11)+δCCC(11) ηCCCO(42)+ηHCOC(23)+ηCCCC
0 (10)
64 265w 281 270 0.00 8.2 ηHCOC(75)+ηCCCC(11) 65 256 246 0.00 50.85 δCOC(85) 66 223m 254 244 0.28 0 ηHCOC(62)+ηCCCO(22) 67 208 200 0.00 98.9 ηCCCC(51)+ηHCOC(22) 68 183 176 0.13 0 ηCCCC(53) 69 145w 173 166 4.04 0 δCOC(80) 70 118 114 7.52 0 ηCCCO(72) 71 96vs 95 91 0.00 30.45 ηCCOC(89)
72 61 59 3.85 0 ηCCCC(70) ν-stretching; δ-in-plane-bending; γ-out-of-plane bending; η-torsion; ρ-rocking; w-weak; s-strong;
vs-very strong; m-medium, aIIR-IR Intensity (Kmmol
−1);
bIRa-Raman intensity (Arb units) (intensity
normalized to 100%).
198
method is assigned to C-H stretching vibrations. A strong band appeared at
3127 and 3055 cm-1
in FTIR spectrum and at 3082 cm-1
in FT-Raman
spectrum are assigned to C-H ring stretching vibrations. As evident from the
TED column, they are pure stretching vibrations almost contributing to above
90%. The C-C-H in-plane ring bending vibrations are normally occurred as a
number of strong to weak intensity bands in the region 1300-1000 cm-1
[44].
In the present case, the C-H in-plane bending vibrations of the present
compound are computed in the range 1390-932 cm-1
by B3LYP method. The
wavenumbers observed at 1391 cm-1
in FTIR spectrum and at
1386 cm-1
in FT-Raman spectrum showed excellent agreement with predicted
wavenumbers 1390 cm-1
. Substitution patterns on the ring can be judged from
the out-of-plane bending of the ring C–H bonds in the region 960–675 cm−1
and these bands are highly informative [45]. The C-H out-of-plane bending
vibrations are normally observed in the region 1000–809 cm−1
[44, 46-49].
The C-H out-of-plane bending vibrations are observed in FTIR spectrum at
963, 931, 862 and 712 cm-1
and FT-Raman at 853 cm-1
. The experimental and
theoretical (1013-712 cm-1
by B3LYP method) out-of-plane bending
vibrational wavenumbers are found to be well within their characteristic
region.
6.5.2.2. -OCH3 group vibrations
Electronic effects such as back-donation and induction, mainly caused
by the presence of oxygen atom adjacent to CH3 group, can shift the position
199
of CH stretching and bending modes [50-53]. Methyl group vibrations are
generally referred to as electron-donating substituent in the aromatic rings
system, the antisymmetric C-H stretching mode of CH3 is expected around
2980 cm-1
and CH3 symmetric stretching is expected at 2870 cm-1
[54, 55].
For the assignments of CH3 group one can expect that nine fundamentals can
be associated to each CH3 group, namely the symmetrical stretching in CH3
(CH3 symmetric stretch) and asymmetrical stretching (CH3 asymmetric
stretch), in-plane stretching modes (i.e. in-plane hydrogen stretching mode),
the symmetrical (CH3 symmetric deform) and asymmetrical (CH3 asymmetric
deform) deformation modes, the in-plane rocking (CH3 ipr), out-of-plane
rocking (CH3 opr) and twisting (tCH3) bending modes. For the methyl group
compound [56], the asymmetric stretching mode appears in the range 2825-
2870 cm−1
, lower in magnitude compared to its value in CH3 (compounds)
(2860-2935 cm−1
) whereas the asymmetric stretching modes for both the type
of compounds lie in the same region 2925-2985 cm−1
. The weak bands
observed at 2984, 2941 cm−1
in FTIR spectrum and at 3008, 2960 and 2937
cm−1
in FT-Raman spectrum could be attributed to CH3 asymmetric stretching
vibrations. The same vibrations are computed at 3024, 2957 cm−1
by B3LYP
method show good agreement with experimental observations. The bands
observed at 2880 cm−1
in FTIR spectrum and at 2851 cm-1
in FT-Raman
spectrum could be attributed to CH3 symmetric stretching vibration. The
theoretically computed value for symmetric stretching vibration at 2898 cm−1
200
and 2897 cm−1
by B3LYP method show excellent agreement with
experimental observation.
For methyl substituted benzene derivatives, the antisymmetric and
symmetric deformation vibrations of methyl group normally appear in the
region 1465–1440 cm−1
and 1390–1370 cm−1
, respectively [57-59] while the
rocking mode appear in the 990-1050 cm−1
predicted by the DFT calculation,
the series of bands appearing in the 1400-1500 cm−1
region are mainly due to
the methyl deformation coupling with the ring C-C-H bending and C-C
stretching motions, to different extents and in different ways. In the case of
title molecule, the bands observed at 1470 and 1466 cm−1
in FTIR and FT-
Raman spectrum respectively correspond to CH3 deformation and correlated
with the calculated wavenumbers at 1463cm−1
by B3LYP method.
6.5.2.3. Ring vibrations
Naphthalene ring stretching vibrations are expected in the region 1620-
1390 cm-1
. Naphthalene ring vibrations are found to make a major
contribution in the IR and Raman spectra [60, 61]. The wavenumbers
observed in FTIR spectrum at 1611, 1597, 1541, 1495, 1344 and 1321 cm-1
and in FT-Raman spectrum at 1583 and 1453 cm-1
are assigned to C-C
stretching vibrations. The theoretically predicted harmonic wavenumbers at
1612, 1585, 1574, 1501, 1453, 1365 and 1329 cm-1
(mode nos. 13-16, 19,
26-27) by B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) level show a good agreement with experimental
data. These vibrations are mixed up with C-H in-plane bending vibrations as
201
shown in Table 6.2. The TED corresponds to these vibrations are mixed
modes as evident from Table 6.2.
6.5.2.4. C-O-C vibrations
The (O-C) and (C-O) stretching vibrations have already been reported
by Druzbicki et al. [62] and Dolega et al. [63] at ~1270 cm-1
and ~1040 cm-1
.
In the present study, the observed stretching bands are observed at 1274 and
1244 cm-1
in FTIR and 1080 cm-1
in FT-Raman. And then we have calculated
the ν (O-Cnaphthalene) frequency in methoxynaphthalene group is at 1250
and 1244 cm-1
. On the otherhand, the stretching vibrations of the ν (Cmethyl-O)
band assigned at 1080 and 1014 cm-1
. The TED corresponds to these
vibrations are mixed modes as evident from Table 6.2.
6.5.3. NBO analysis
NBO analysis has been performed on the molecule 1,5-
dimethoxynaphthalene at the DFT/B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) level in order to elucidate
the intramolecular, rehybridizaion and delocalization of electron density within
the molecule. Natural bond orbital analysis provides an efficient method for
studying intra-and intermolecular bonding and interaction among bonds, and
also provides a convenient basis for investigating charge transfer or
conjugative interaction in molecular systems [64]. The larger E(2) value, the
more intensive is the interaction between electron donors and electron
acceptors, i.e., the more donating tendency from electron donors to electron
acceptors and the greater the extent of conjugation of the whole system.
202
Delocalization of electron density between occupied Lewis-type (bond or lone
pair) NBO orbitals and formally unoccupied (antibond or Rydgberg) non-
Lewis NBO orbitals correspond to a stabilizing donor-acceptor interaction.
The second-order Fock matrix was carried out to evaluate the donor-acceptor
interactions in the NBO analysis [65]. The interactions result is a loss of
occupancy from the localized NBO of the idealized Lewis structure into an
empty non-Lewis orbital. For each donor (i) and acceptor (j), the stabilization
energy E(2) associated with the delocalization i→j is estimated as
E (2) = ΔEij
= qi
F (i , j )2
ε −ε
…….. (6.2) j i
Where qi is the donor orbital occupancy, εi and εj are diagonal elements and
F(i, j) is the off diagonal NBO Fock matrix element.
The intramolecular interaction are formed by the orbital overlap between ζ(C-
C) and ζ*C-C); π(C-C) and π*(C-C) bond orbital which results intramolecular
charge transfer (ICT) causing stabilization of the system. The strong
intramolecular hyperconjugation interaction of the ζ and π electrons of C-C
and C-H to anti C-C, C-H and C-O bond in the ring leads to stabilization of
some part of the ring as evident from Table 6.3. Particularly in the
naphthalene ring system, the intramolecular hyperconjugative interaction of
the π(C5-C10) conjugate with antibonding orbital of [π*(C1-C2), π*(C6-C7)]
and [π*(C3-C4), π*(C8-C9)] which leads to charge delocalization of 18.97
and 15.88 kJ/mol respectively.
203
Table 6.3: Second order perturbation theory analysis of Fock matrix in NBO basis
for 1, 5-dimethoxynaphthalene
Donor (i) ED (i)(e) Acceptor (j) ED E(2) KJ E(j)-E(i) F(i,j)
(j)(e) mol-1
a.u a.u
π*(C3-C4) 0.265 18.68 0.31 0.068
π(C1-C2) 1.739 π
*(C5-C10) 0.469 13.72 0.3 0.06
π*(C1-C2) 0.330 15.53 0.28 0.06
π(C3-C4) 1.756 π
*(C5-C10) 0.469 16.81 0.29 0.066
π*(C1-C2) 0.330 18.97 0.27 0.065
π*(C3-C4) 0.265 15.88 0.28 0.062
π(C5-C10) 1.585
π*(C6-C7) 0.330 18.97 0.27 0.065
π*(C8-C9) 0.265 15.88 0.28 0.062
π*(C5-C10) 0.469 13.72 0.3 0.06
π(C6-C7) 1.739 π
*(C8-C9) 0.265 18.68 0.31 0.068
π*(C5-C10) 0.469 16.81 0.29 0.066
π(C8-C9) 1.756 π
*(C6-C7) 0.330 15.53 0.28 0.06
ζ(C2-C3) 1.975 ζ*(C1-O13) 0.028 5.21 1.04 0.066
ζ(C2-H15) 1.978 ζ*(C1-C10) 0.029 4.55 1.06 0.062
ζ(C4-H17) 1.980 ζ*(C2-C3) 0.016 4.06 1.07 0.059
ζ*(C5-C10) 0.030 4.26 1.06 0.06
LP(2)O11 1.840 π*(C6-C7) 0.330 31.12 0.35 0.097
LP(2)O13 1.840 π*(C1-C2) 0.330 31.12 0.35 0.097
π*(C1-C2) 0.330 π
*(C3-C4) 0.265 172.2 0.01 0.076
π*(C6-C7) 0.330 π
*(C8-C9) 0.265 172.2 0.01 0.076
ED means Electron Density
dE(2) means energy of hyper conjugative interactions
eEnergy difference between donor and acceptor i and j NBO orbitals
fF(i,j) is the Fock matrix element between i and j NBO orbitals
204
On the otherhand, Among the title molecule, a strong intramolecular
hyperconjugative interaction of π-electrons with the greater energy
contributions from C1-C2 → C3-C4(18.68 kJmol−1
), C5-C10(13.72 kJmol−1
);
C3-C4 → C1-C2 (15.53 kJmol−1
), C5-C10 (16.81 kJmol−1
); C6-C7 → C5-
C10 (13.72 kJmol−1
), C8-C9 (18.68 kJmol−1
); C8-C9 → C5-C10 (16.81
kJmol−1
), C6-C7 (15.53 kJmol−1
) for naphthalene ring of the molecule,
Furthermore, the most interaction energy, related to the resonance in the
molecule, is electron donating from the nO11(2) and nO13(2) to the antibonding
acceptor π*(C6-C7) and π*(C1-C2) leads to moderate stabilization energy of
31.12 kJ/mol respectively. The π*(C6-C7) and π*(C1-C2) of the NBO
conjugated with π*(C8-C9) and π*(C3-C4) resulting to a greater stabilization
energy of 171.2 kJ/mol respectively for the title molecule.
6.5.4. Frontier molecular orbital analysis
The electronic absorption corresponds to the transition from the ground
to the first excited state and is mainly described by one electron excitation
from the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) to the lowest
unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO). The HOMO represents the ability to
donate an electron, LUMO as an electron acceptor represents the ability to
obtain an electron. Both HOMO and LUMO are the main orbitals that take
part in chemical stability [66]. The energy values of LUMO and HOMO and
their energy gap reflect the chemical activity of the molecule. The decrease in
the HOMO and LUMO energy explains the Intramolecular charge transfer
205
(ICT) interaction taking place within the molecule which is responsible for
the activity of the molecule. The HOMO-LUMO energy separation has served
as a simple measure of kinetic stability. A molecule with a small or no
HOMO-LUMO gap is a chemically reactive [67-69]. Pearson showed that the
HOMO-LUMO gap represents the chemical hardness of the molecule [70,
71]. The HOMO-LUMO energy gap of 1,5-dimethoxynaphthalene was
calculated at the B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) level and their values shown below
reveals that the energy gap reflect the chemical activity of the molecule. The
HOMO is located over the naphthalene part of the molecule, the HOMO →
LUMO transition implies an electron density transfer to oxygen and
conjugated bond of ring system from naphthalene part. Moreover, these
orbital significantly overlap in their position for 1,5-dimethoxynaphthalene.
The atomic orbital compositions of the frontier molecular orbital are sketched
in Fig.6.4.
HOMO energy = -5.0986 eV
LUMO energy = -0.4757 eV
HOMO-LUMO energy gap = 4.6230 eV
206
HOMO Plot
(Ground state)
HOMO Energy = -5.0986 eV
Energy gap = 4.6230 eV
LUMO Energy = -0.4757 eV
LUMO Plot
(First excited state)
Fig. 6.4: The atomic orbital compositions of the frontier molecular orbital for
1, 5-dimethoxynaphthalene
207
6.5.5. Molecular electrostatic potential (MEP)
The molecular electrostatic potential, V(r) is related to the electronic
density and is a very useful descriptor for determining sites for electrophilic
attack and nucleophilic reactions as well as hydrogen bonding interaction [72,
73]. MEP values were calculated using the equation [74]:
V(r) =∑ZA/|RA-r|-∫ρ (r′)/|r
′-r|d
3r
′
……… (6.3)
where, ZA is the charge of nucleus A located at RA, ρ(r’) is the electronic
density function of the molecule, and r’ is the dummy integration variable. To
predict reactive sites for electrophilic and nucleophilic attack for the title
molecule, MEP was calculated at the B3LYP/6-31G (d,p) optimized
geometry. The negative (red) regions of MEP were related to electrophilic
reactivity and the positive (blue) regions to nucleophilic reactivity shown in
Fig. 6.5.
As easily can be seen in figure this molecule has two possible sites for
electrophilic attack over O11 and O13. For the title compound, the maximum
negative electrostatic potential is noted over the oxygen atoms. For possible
nucleophilic reactions the maximum positive region is found on the hydrogen
of the naphthalene ring.
208
Fig. 6.5: Molecular electrostatic potential map of 1, 5-dimethoxynaphthalene
calculated by B3LYP/6-31G (d, p) method
209
6.6. CONCLUSION
In this present study, we have investigated to clarify the characterization
of 1,5-dimethoxynaphthalene by using of computational methods along with the
FTIR and FT-Raman spectra of 1,5-dimethoxynaphthalene. The molecular
geometry and wavenumber have been calculated using DFT/B3LYP with 6-
31G (d, p) basis set and the normal modes are assigned based on TED values.
The equilibrium geometries, atomic charges and harmonic wavenumbers
calculations of 1,5-dimethoxynaphthalene have been carried out for the first time
at DFT level. The vibrational frequencies of the fundamental modes of the
compound have been precisely assigned and analyzed and the theoretical
results were compared with the experimental vibrations. The theoretically
constructed IR and Raman spectra exactly coincide with experimentally
observed counterparts. The NBO result reflects the charge transfer mainly due
to methoxy group. HUMO and LUMO orbitals have been visualized. It has
been conclude that the lowest singlet excited state of the 1,5-
dimethoxynaphthalene molecule is mainly derived from the HOMO →
LUMO (π→π*) electron transition.
210
References
[1]. D. Hoffmann, E.L. Wynder, A.C. Stern (Eds.), Air Pollution, vol. 2,
Academic Press, New York, 1977, pp. 361.
[2]. M. Nordquist, D.R. Thakker, H. Yagi, R.E. Lehr, A.W. Wood, W.
Levin, A.H. Conney, D.M. Jerina, R.S. Bhatnagar (Eds.), Molecular
Basis of Environmental Toxicity, Ann Arbor Science Publisher, Ann
Arbor, MI, 1980, pp. 329.
[3]. R.G. Harvey, Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons: Chemistry and
Carcinogenicity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1991.
[4]. S. Motta, C. Federico, S. Saccone, V. Librando, P. Mossesso, Mutat.
Res. 561 (2004) 45.
[5]. J.E. Amoore, E. Hautala, J. Appl. Toxicol. 3 (6) (1983) 272-290.
[6]. J.L. Puget, A. Leger, F. Boulanger, Astron. Astrophys.142 (1985) L19.
[7]. L.J. Allamandola, Top. Curr. Chem. 153 (1990) 1.
[8]. J. Szczepanski, M. Vala, Nature 363 (1993) 699.
[9]. M. Duncan, Astrobiol. Mag. 25 (2008).
[10]. F. Warnia, D. Mackay, Environ. Sci. Technol. 30 (1996) 390.
[11]. P.T. Williams, K.D. Bartle, G.E. Andrews, Fuel 65 (1986) 1150.
[12]. J. Bundt, W. Herbel, H. Steinhart, S. Franke, W. Francke, High
Resolut. Chromatogr. 14 (1991) 91.
[13]. S. Chandra, H. Saleem, N. Sundaraganesan, S. Sebastian, Spectrochim.
Acta A 74 (2009) 704.
[14]. V. Librando, A. Alparone, Environ. Sci. Technol. 41 (2007) 1646.
[15]. V. Librando, A. Alparone, Polycycl. Aromat. Compd. 27 (2007) 65.
[16]. A. Srivastava, V.B. Singh, Ind. J. Pure Appl. Phys. 45 (2007) 714.
[17]. P. Das, E. Arunan, P.K. Das, Vib. Spectrosc. 47 (2008) 1.
[18]. V. Krishnakumar, R. Mathammal, S. Muthunatesan, Spectrochim. Acta
A 70 (2008) 201.
[19]. M. Arivazhagan, V. Krishnakumar, R.R.J. Xavier, G. Ilango, V.
Balachandran, Spectrochim. Acta A 70 (2008) 201.
[20]. V. Krishnakumar, R. Mathammal, S. Muthunatesan, Spectrochim. Acta
A 70 (2008) 210.
[21]. P.B. Nagabalasubramanian, S. Periandy, Spectrochim. Acta A 77
(2010) 1099.
211
[22]. E. Kavitha, N. Sundaraganesan, S. Sebastian, M. Kurt, Spectrochim.
Acta A 77 (2010) 612.
[23]. J. Xavier, V. Balachandran, M. Arivazhagan, G. Ilango, Ind. J. Pure
Appl. Phys. 48 (2010) 245.
[24]. M. Govindarajan, K. Ganasan, S. Periandy, M. Karabacak,
Spectrochim. Acta 79A (2011) 646.
[25]. P.B. Nagabalasubramanian, M. Karabacak, S. Periandy, Spectrochim.
Acta 82A (2011) 169.
[26]. D. Shoba, M. Karabacak, S. Periandy, S. Ramalingam, Spectrochim.
Acta 81A (2011) 504.
[27]. D. Shoba, S. Periandy, M. Karabacak, S. Ramalingam, Spectrochim.
Acta 83A (2011) 540.
[28]. T. Prabhu, S. Periandy, S. Mohan, Spectrochim. Acta 78A (2011) 566.
[29]. P.B. Nagabalasubramanian, M. Karabacak, S. Periandy, Spectrochim.
Acta 85A (2012) 43.
[30]. B.D. Ostojić, D.S. Ðorđević, Chem. Phys. Lett. 536 (2012) 19.
[31]. M. Govindarajan, M. Karabacak, Spectrochim. Acta 85A (2012) 251.
[32]. Gaussian 03 program, (Gaussian Inc, Wallingford CT), 2004.
[33]. H.B. Schlegel, J. Comput. Chem. 3 (1982) 214.
[34]. A. Frisch, A.B. Nielson, A.J. Holder, GAUSSVIEW User Manual,
Gaussian Inc, Pittsburgh, PA, 2000.
[35]. V. Krishnakumar, R. Mathammal, S. Muthunatesan, Spectrochim. Acta
70A (2008) 210.
[36]. M.H. Jamroz, Vibrational Enegy Distribution Analysis, VEDA 4
Computer Program, Poland, 2004.
[37]. N. Sundaraganesan, G. Mariappan, S. Manoharan, Spectrochim. Acta
A 87 (2011) 67.
[38]. G. Kereztury, S. Holly, J. Varga, G. Besenyei, A.Y. Wang, J.R. Durig,
Specrochim. Acta 49A (1993) 2007.
[39]. G. Kereztury, in: J.M. Chalmers, P.R. Griffith (Eds.), Raman
Spectroscopy: Theory, in Hand book of Vibrational Spectroscopy, vol.
1, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, New York, 2002.
[40]. V. Krishnakumar, V. Balachandran, T. Chithambarathanu,
Spectrochim. Acta 62A (2005) 918.
[41]. N. Puviarasan, V. Arjunan S. Mohan, Turk. J. Chem. 26 (2002) 323.
212
[42]. G. Varsanyi, Vibrational Spectra of Benzene Derivatives, Academic
Press, New York, 1969.
[43]. V. Krishnakumar, R. John Xavier, Ind. J. Pure Appl. Phys. 41 (2003)
597.
[44]. N. Sundaraganesan, H. Saleem, S. Mohan, M. Ramalingam, V.
Sethuraman, Spectrochim. Acta 62A (2005) 740.
[45]. P.S. Kalsi, Spectroscopy of Organic Compounds, Wiley Eastern
Limited, New Delhi, 1993, pp. 116.
[46]. V. Krishnakumar, N. Prabavathi, Spectrochim. Acta 71A (2008) 449.
[47]. A. Altun, K. Gölcük, M. Kumru, J. Mol. Struct. (Theochem.) 637
(2003) 155.
[48]. Y.X. Sun, Q.L. Hao, Z.X. Yu, W.J. Jiang, L.D. Lu, X. Wang,
Spectrochim. Acta 73A (2009) 892.
[49]. N. Sundaraganesan, B.D. Joshua, T. Radjakoumar, Ind. J. Pure Appl.
Phys. 47 (2009) 248.
[50]. B. Smith, Infrared Spectral Interpretation, A Systematic Approach,
CRC Press, Washington, DC, 1999.
[51]. M. Gussoni, C. Castiglioni, J. Mol. Struct. 521 (2000) 1.
[52]. J. Palomar, J.L.G. De Paz, J. Catalan, Chem. Phys. 246 (1999) 167.
[53]. M. Rumi, G. Zerbi, J. Mol. Struct. 509 (1999) 11.
[54]. D. Sajan, I. Hubert Joe, V. S. Jayakumar, J. Raman Spectrosc. 37
(2005) 508.
[55]. M. Gussoni, C. Castiglioni, M. N. Ramos, M. C. Rui, G. Zerbi, J. Mol.
Struct. 224 (1990) 445.
[56]. D.N. Singh, I.D. Singh, R.A. Yadav, Ind. J. Phys. 76B (3) (2002) 307.
[57]. B. V. Reddy, G. R. Rao, Vib. Spectrosc. 6 (1994) 231.
[58]. J. F. Areanas, I. L. Tocn, J. C. Otero, J. I. Marcos, J. Mol. Struct. 410
(1997) 443.
[59]. D. A. Long, W. O. Jeorge, Spectrochim. Acta 19 (1963) 1777.
[60]. C. Surisseau, P. Marvel, J. Raman Spectrosc. 25 (1994) 447.
[61]. A.J. Barnes, M.A. Majid, M.A. Stuckey, P. Gregory, C.V. Stead,
Spectrochim. Acta 41A (1985) 629.
[62]. Kacper Druzbicki, Edward Mikuli, Miroslawa D Ossowska-Chrusciel,
Vib. Spectrosc. 52 (2010) 54.
[63]. Diana Dolega, Anna Migdal-Mikuli, Janusz Chrusciel J. Mol. Struc.
933 (2009) 30.
213
[64]. M. Snehalatha, C. Ravikumar, I. Hubert Joe, N. Sekar, V.S.
Jayakumar, Spectrochim. Acta A 72 (2009) 654.
[65]. M. Szafran, A. Komasa, E.B. Adamska, J. Mol. Struct. (Theochem.)
827 (2007) 101.
[66]. R.G. Pearson, J. Org. Chem. 54 (1989) 1423.
[67]. J.I. Aihara, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2 (2000) 3121.
[68]. X. Liu, T.G. Schmalz, D.J. Klein, Chem. Phys. Lett. 188 (1992) 550.
[69]. M.D. Diener, J.M. Alford, Nature (London) 393 (1998) 668.
[70]. R.G. Pearson, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83 (1986) 8440.
[71]. R.G. Pearson, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 110 (1988) 2092.
[72]. E. Scrocco, J. Tomasi, Adv. Quant. Chem. 11 (1978) 115.
[73]. N. Okulik, A.H. Jubert, Internet Electron. J. Mol. Des. 4 (2005) 17.
[74]. P. Politzer, J.S. Murray, Theor. Chem. Acc. 1087 (2002) 134.