quantifying access and mobility of toxic elements in nlm ... · quantifying access and mobility of...

Quantifying access and mobility of

toxic elements in NLM smelter slags

A.L. Morrison

July 2015

Scale of the slag issue

• Approximately 2.1 M tonnes (~650,000 m3) of

slag exported to the community;

• Pb in exported slag (~1-2%) represents >1000

years of declared* smelter stack emissions;

• A covering of the residential area of Boolaroo to a

depth of 300mm;

• Waste costs externalised around $400M in todays

$’s (@$200/tonne).

*National Pollution Inventory (NPI) 1999-2003 maximum 20 tonnes/yr (2001)

1 Km

Creek Reserve Road

Tredennick Oval

Eleebana

North Lake Macquarie, NSW

50m

Creek Reserve Road, Boolaroo (CR)Slag infill during creek bank restoration

50m

Tredennick Oval, Boolaroo (TN)Slag layer over old landfill

50m

Lion’s Park, Eleebana (ELB)Slag used in stabilisation berm during landslip remediation

“Slag produced by Pasminco Metals-Sulphide has a

lead content of about 0.7%. The lead is bound up in

a glass like structure and does not readily leach

out. Lead in crystal drinking glass for example is

about 22% and is chemically bound up in the glass in a

similar way.”

Pasminco Community Newsletter cited in LMCC

Planning and Environment Minutes, July 1992.

The Myth

“most of the heavy metals present in the slag are in

readily bioavailable forms. It is likely that ingested

slag, reaching the gut would readily release lead,

zinc, cadmium and copper, and this could have

toxic consequences”

G.E Batley, CSIRO Investigation Report CET/LHIR077,

June 1992.

The Withheld Truth

These earlier results were confirmed in the study of bioaccessibility

(Morrison and Gulson) published in 2007 and subsequently by

others (Kim et al., 2009).

Hypothesis

• Slag is benign in the environment

• Metals contained in the slag remain insitu

when exposed to infiltrating fluids e.g.

rainwater, seawater, acidic leachates

Toxic metal inclusions are all

surrounded by an impervious

silicate slag matrix

Toxic metals form part of the

structure of the impervious

silicate slag matrix

and/or

Morphology needed for hypothesis

to be correct

SEM QEMSCAN

Allows detailed examination of

individual particles and the

attached EDS system can

determine semi-quantitative

chemistry over a wide range of

elements.

Automated analyses using EDS of

~1-2µm “spots”, software then

maps individual particles over a

sample. Automation allows large

numbers of particles to be

chemically mapped but at a lower

degree of precision.

SEM Analyses

Sample sized -250+180 µm

SEM Analyses Sample sized -250+180 µm

SEM Analyses Sample sized -20 µm

0.00 0.40 0.80 1.20 1.60 2.00 2.40 2.80 3.20 3.60

keV

001

0

800

1600

2400

3200

4000

4800

5600

6400C

oun

ts

OK

a

SK

a

SK

b

PbM

z

Pb

Ma

Pb

Mb

Pb

Mr

ZAF Method Quantitative Analysis

Element (keV) mass% At% O K 0.525 11.3 52.2S K 2.307 8.2 19.0

Pb M 2.342 80.5 28.8Total 100.0 100.0

0.00 0.40 0.80 1.20 1.60 2.00 2.40 2.80 3.20 3.60

keV

001

0

800

1600

2400

3200

4000

4800

5600

6400C

oun

ts

OK

a

SK

a

SK

b

PbM

z

Pb

Ma

Pb

Mb

Pb

Mr

ZAF Method Quantitative Analysis

Element (keV) mass% At% O K 0.525 11.3 52.2S K 2.307 8.2 19.0

Pb M 2.342 80.5 28.8Total 100.0 100.0

Spectral analysis of nodules

These results suggest that the compound formed is likely to be metallic lead and its

oxidation products possibly PbO.PbSO4 (monobasic lead sulfate, larnachite) which

would have elemental ratios of 2:1:5 (Pb:S:O). Larnachite had been previously also

identified as a component of the slag by XRD

0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00

keV

002

0

400

800

1200

1600

2000

2400

2800

3200

3600

4000

Co

un

ts

OK

a

NaK

a

AlK

aS

iKa

SK

aS

Kb

CaK

a

CaK

b

Mn

Ll

Mn

La

Mn

Ka

Mn

Kb

FeL

lF

eL

a

FeK

esc

FeK

a

FeK

b

Zn

Ll

Zn

La

Zn

Ka

Zn

Kb

ZAF Method Standardless Quantitative AnalysisFitting Coefficient : 0.1504Element (keV) mass% At% Element (keV) mass% At%O K 0.525 32.7 57.0 Ca K 3.960 11.3 7.9

Na K 1.041 1.9 2.4 Mn K 5.894 2.3 1.4Al K 1.486 3.4 3.5 Fe K 6.398 24.6 12.3Si K 1.739 8.3 8.3 Zn K 8.630 13.5 5.8 S K 2.307 2.0 1.8

0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00

keV

002

0

400

800

1200

1600

2000

2400

2800

3200

3600

4000

Co

un

ts

OK

a

NaK

a

AlK

aS

iKa

SK

aS

Kb

CaK

a

CaK

b

Mn

Ll

Mn

La

Mn

Ka

Mn

Kb

FeL

lF

eL

a

FeK

esc

FeK

a

FeK

b

Zn

Ll

Zn

La

Zn

Ka

Zn

Kb

ZAF Method Standardless Quantitative AnalysisFitting Coefficient : 0.1504Element (keV) mass% At% Element (keV) mass% At%O K 0.525 32.7 57.0 Ca K 3.960 11.3 7.9

Na K 1.041 1.9 2.4 Mn K 5.894 2.3 1.4Al K 1.486 3.4 3.5 Fe K 6.398 24.6 12.3Si K 1.739 8.3 8.3 Zn K 8.630 13.5 5.8 S K 2.307 2.0 1.8

Spectral analysis of glassy phase

Pb, Sb, As,

Cd, AgZn

Location for significant trace elements

Availability of toxic species to

infiltrating fluids

QEMSCAN particle

mapping

Background

Pb.S

Pb.S.Sb

Pb.Fe.S

Pb.Cu.S

Pb.S.SnL

Silicates

Sulphides

Sulphates

Carbonates

Phosphates

Others

QEMSCAN particle

mapping

Background

Pb Met (Low Ox)

Pb Met (High Ox)

Fe Ox (Low Pb)

Cu Met (Low Pb)

Fe.As (Low Cu)

As Oxides

Silicates

Sulphides

Sulphates

Carbonates

Phosphates

Oxides

Others250 µm

Modal Mineralogy

Outcomes: Mineral Mapping

• Slag contain ~1% Pb phases and 97% vitreous

silicate glass

Creek Reserve (CR1) Tredennick Oval (TN2)

Pb Met (Low Ox)

Pb Met (High Ox)

Fe Ox (Low Pb)

Cu Met (Low Pb)

Fe.As (Low Cu)

As Oxides

Silicates (glassy matrix)

Sulphides

Sulphates

Carbonates

Phosphates

Oxides

Others

Pb Met (Low Ox)

Pb Met (High Ox)

Fe Ox (Low Pb)

Cu Met (Low Pb)

Fe.As (Low Cu)

As Oxides

Silicates (glassy matrix)

Sulphides

Sulphates

Carbonates

Phosphates

Oxides

Others

Pb in contact with Si

(or anything else other

than Pb) but not epoxy

Si (or anything other

than Pb) boundary

with epoxy/background

Pb in contact with Pb

only

Pb in contact with

epoxy/background

Si in contact with Si (or

anything else other

than Pb)

Phase Association Schematic

ACCESSIBILITY MODEL

>90% reaction

surface exposed

>9% reaction surface

exposed

Reaction surface

exposed limited to

<9%

LIBERATED ACCESSIBLE LOCKED

Background

Pb Met (Low Ox)

Pb Met (High Ox)

Fe Ox (Low Pb)

Cu Met (Low Pb)

Fe.As (Low Cu)

As Oxides

Silicates

Sulphides

Sulphates

Carbonates

Phosphates

Oxides

Others

SIZE (µm) LIBERATED ACCESSIBLE LOCKED TOTAL

-3350/2000 6.83 72.39 20.77 100-2000/1000 0.52 85.27 14.21 100-1000/500 0.56 58.79 40.65 100-500/250 86.04 11.50 2.47 100-250/150 87.92 11.16 0.92 100-150/90 78.72 20.25 1.03 100-90/53 73.37 24.36 2.27 100

-53 37.66 59.02 3.32 100

Size dependence of accessibility of Pb

species in sample TN1 (%)

SAMPLE LIBERATED ACCESSIBLE LOCKED TOTAL

CR1-2 76.7 21.8 1.5 100CR1-3 56.4 41.0 2.6 100CR2-2 69.6 25.6 4.8 100CR2 (comb) 42.3 51.2 6.5 100TN1-2 59.1 39.8 1.2 100TN1 (comb) 65.3 30.7 4.1 100TN2-2 79.7 19.0 1.4 100TN2-3 56.0 43.0 1.1 100

Overall accessibility of Pb species in samples

(-250 µm) (%)

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

0 50 100 150 200 250

Average particle screen size (µm)

Le

ad

bio

ac

ce

ss

ibil

ity

(%

)S1

S2

S4

Bioaccessibility of Pb species in slag

samples (-250 µm) (%)

Screen

Size

(µm)

Pb LOW

OX

av.dia

(µm)

Pb HIGH

OX

av.dia

(µm)

Bio-

accessibility

%

LIBERATED

(%)ACCESSIBLE

(%)

LOCKED

(%)

-250+180 12 9 23.2 35.6 50.3 14.1

-180+150 16 12 51.8 40.4 42.2 17.4

-150+125 22 10 55.6 34.3 51.7 14.0

-125+90 17 12 58.7 39.7 50.0 10.4

-90+75 10 7 75.4 61.3 31.4 7.4

-75+53 11 8 76.8 55.9 38.5 5.6

-53+32 9 9 77.4 51.0 44.1 4.9

-32+20 5 7 83.1 62.3 34.9 2.9

-20 6 6 100.0 56.4 41.4 2.2

Overall accessibility of Pb species in samples

(S1) (-250 µm) (%)

•Pb phases in the slags are mostly separate

from the glassy slag matrix

•The Pb phases are generally unprotected

from infiltrating fluids

• A consequence is that the Pb contained in

the slags will be vulnerable to leaching over

time

Conclusions on Accessibility

Sampling Program Extension

• Develop chemical soil profiles at three

locations

• Sample at known slag emplacements

• Incrementally sample to subsoil below slag

layer

• Chemically and morphologically analyse

sample increments

Sampling and Analysis Methods

• Auger Sampling (100 mm Φ /100mm increments)

• Duplicate holes for each site approximately 1m apart

• Subsampling and sizing of increments

• Comprises 35 replicated samples

• Chemistry using X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF)

• Chemistry using ICP-AES (for Pb, Zn, Cu) and ICP-MS (for Ag, As, Cd, Sb,Se)

• Elemental mapping using electron dispersive spectrometry (EDS)

Generic soil/slag infill profileGrass (sometimes)

and topsoil

(sometimes) of

varying thicknessMixed soil/slag

at interface

Slag only layer of

varying thickness

(400 – 600mm)

Underlying

subsoil or fill

Mixed soil/slag

at interface

Range of Pb and Zn values

measured

• Pb

1785 – 17,100 ppm

• Zn

10,700 – 80,850 ppm

Slag/soil lead (Pb) profiles

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

0 10000 20000

Soil Pb (ppm)

Ave

rag

e d

ista

nce

fro

m s

urf

ace

(m

m)

CR1 CR2 CR (AVERAGE)

Soil/Clay

Mixed

Slag/Soil

Mostly

Slag

Some soil near surface

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

0 10000 20000 30000

Soil Pb (ppm)

Ave

rag

e d

ista

nce

fro

m s

urf

ace

(m

m)

TN1 TN2 TN (AVERAGE)

Soil/Clay

Mixed

Slag/Soil

Mostly

Slag


0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

0 5000 10000

Soil Pb (ppm)

Ave

rag

e d

ista

nce

fro

m s

urf

ace

(m

m)

ELB1 ELB2 ELB (AVERAGE)

Soil/Clay

Mixed

Slag/Soil

throughout

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

0 10000 20000

Soil Pb (mg/kg)

Ave

rag

e d

ista

nce

fro

m s

urf

ace

(m

m)

Soil/Clay

Mixed

Slag/Soil

Mostly

Slag

Some soil near surface 0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

0 10000 20000 30000

Soil Pb (mg/kg)

Ave

rag

e d

ista

nce

fro

m s

urf

ace

(m

m)

Soil/Clay

Mixed

Slag/Soil

Mostly

Slag


100

200

300

400

500

600

700

0 5000 10000

Soil Pb (mg/kg)

Ave

rag

e d

ista

nce

fro

m s

urf

ace

(m

m)

Soil/Clay

Mixed

Slag/Soil

throughout

Slag/soil zinc (Zn) profiles

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

0 10000 20000

Soil Pb (ppm)

Ave

rag

e d

ista

nce

fro

m s

urf

ace

(m

m)


Soil/Clay

Mixed

Slag/Soil

Mostly

Slag


0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

0 10000 20000 30000

Soil Pb (ppm)

Ave

rag

e d

ista

nce

fro

m s

urf

ace

(m

m)


Soil/Clay

Mixed

Slag/Soil

Mostly

Slag


0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

0 5000 10000

Soil Pb (ppm)

Ave

rag

e d

ista

nce

fro

m s

urf

ace

(m

m)


Soil/Clay

Mixed

Slag/Soil

throughout

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

0 30000 60000 90000

Soil Zn (mg/kg)

Ave

rag

e d

ista

nce

fro

m s

urf

ace

(m

m)

Soil/Clay

Mixed

Slag/Soil

Mostly

Slag


100

200

300

400

500

600

700

0 30000 60000 90000

Soil Zn (mg/kg)

Ave

rag

e d

ista

nce

fro

m s

urf

ace

(m

m)

Soil/Clay

Mixed

Slag/Soil

Mostly

Slag


100

200

300

400

500

600

700

0 20000 40000 60000

Soil Zn (mg/kg)A

ve

rag

e d

ista

nce

fro

m s

urf

ace

(m

m)

Soil/Clay

Mixed

Slag/Soil

throughout

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

0 10000 20000

Soil Pb (ppm)

Ave

rag

e d

ista

nce

fro

m s

urf

ace

(m

m)


Soil/Clay

Mixed

Slag/Soil

Mostly

Slag


0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

0 10000 20000 30000

Soil Pb (ppm)

Ave

rag

e d

ista

nce

fro

m s

urf

ace

(m

m)


Soil/Clay

Mixed

Slag/Soil

Mostly

Slag


0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

0 5000 10000

Soil Pb (ppm)

Ave

rag

e d

ista

nce

fro

m s

urf

ace

(m

m)


Soil/Clay

Mixed

Slag/Soil

throughout

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

0 30000 60000 90000

Soil Zn (mg/kg)

Ave

rag

e d

ista

nce

fro

m s

urf

ace

(m

m)

Soil/Clay

Mixed

Slag/Soil

Mostly

Slag


100

200

300

400

500

600

700

0 30000 60000 90000

Soil Zn (mg/kg)

Ave

rag

e d

ista

nce

fro

m s

urf

ace

(m

m)

Soil/Clay

Mixed

Slag/Soil

Mostly

Slag


100

200

300

400

500

600

700

0 20000 40000 60000

Soil Zn (mg/kg)A

ve

rag

e d

ista

nce

fro

m s

urf

ace

(m

m)

Soil/Clay

Mixed

Slag/Soil

throughout

Slag/soil elemental ratio profiles

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

0 0.2 0.4

Pb/Zn ratio

Ave

rag

e d

ista

nce

fro

m s

urf

ace

(m

m)

ELB CR TN

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

0 0.2 0.4

Pb/Zn ratio

Ave

rag

e d

ista

nce

fro

m s

urf

ace

(m

m)

ELB CR TN

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

0 0.2 0.4

Pb/Zn ratio

Ave

rag

e d

ista

nce

fro

m s

urf

ace

(m

m)

ELB CR TN

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

0 0.2 0.4

Pb/Zn ratio

Ave

rag

e d

ista

nce

fro

m s

urf

ace

(m

m)

ELB CR TN

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

0 0.0001 0.0002 0.0003 0.0004

Ag/Zn ratio

Ave

rag

e d

ista

nce

fro

m s

urf

ace

(m

m)

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

0 0.1 0.2

Cu/Zn ratio

Ave

rag

e d

ista

nce

fro

m s

urf

ace

(m

m)

(a) Cu/Zn (b) Pb/Zn (c) Ag/Zn

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

0 0.2 0.4

Pb/Zn ratio

Ave

rag

e d

ista

nce

fro

m s

urf

ace

(m

m)

ELB CR TN

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

0 0.2 0.4

Pb/Zn ratio

Ave

rag

e d

ista

nce

fro

m s

urf

ace

(m

m)

ELB CR TN

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

0 0.2 0.4

Pb/Zn ratio

Ave

rag

e d

ista

nce

fro

m s

urf

ace

(m

m)

ELB CR TN

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

0 0.2 0.4

Pb/Zn ratio

Ave

rag

e d

ista

nce

fro

m s

urf

ace

(m

m)

ELB CR TN

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

0 0.0001 0.0002 0.0003 0.0004

Ag/Zn ratio

Ave

rag

e d

ista

nce

fro

m s

urf

ace

(m

m)

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

0 0.1 0.2

Cu/Zn ratio

Ave

rag

e d

ista

nce

fro

m s

urf

ace

(m

m)

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

0 0.2 0.4

Pb/Zn ratio

Ave

rag

e d

ista

nce

fro

m s

urf

ace

(m

m)

ELB CR TN

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

0 0.2 0.4

Pb/Zn ratio

Ave

rag

e d

ista

nce

fro

m s

urf

ace

(m

m)

ELB CR TN

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

0 0.2 0.4

Pb/Zn ratio

Ave

rag

e d

ista

nce

fro

m s

urf

ace

(m

m)

ELB CR TN

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

0 0.2 0.4

Pb/Zn ratio

Ave

rag

e d

ista

nce

fro

m s

urf

ace

(m

m)

ELB CR TN

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

0 0.0001 0.0002 0.0003 0.0004

Ag/Zn ratio

Ave

rag

e d

ista

nce

fro

m s

urf

ace

(m

m)

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

0 0.1 0.2

Cu/Zn ratio

Ave

rag

e d

ista

nce

fro

m s

urf

ace

(m

m)

(a) Cu/Zn (b) Pb/Zn (c) Ag/Zn

Significance of the soil/slag profile

• Contaminant values are very high when compared to

ANZECC soil health investigation levels (HILs)

– Pb 300 ppm (homes) ; 600 ppm (parks)

– Zn 7000 ppm (homes) ; 14000 ppm (parks)

• Pb is ~1% of the total material

• Pb (and associated elements) appear to be leaching

out of the slag

• Zn (and likely other elements in the glass) appear to

be relatively conserved

Where to from here?• Leach analysis of these stratigraphically

collected slag samples from three selected

locations

Sequential Leach Extraction for

heavy metals :

*includes exchangeable fraction and occluded carbonates

Fraction Leaching Agent pH

Mobile 1M NH4NO3 ~6-7

Easily dissolved* 1M NH4OAC 6.0

Bound to Mn oxides 0.1M HNO3-HCl + 1M NH4OAC 6.0

Bound to organic matter 0.025M NH4-EDTA 4.6

Bound to poorly crystalline Fe oxides 0.2M NH4-Oxalate 3.25

Bound to crystalline Fe oxides 0.1M ascorbic acid+0.2M NH4-Oxalate 3.25

Residual heavy metals “near” total digestion conc HCl/HNO3

Pb

0

20

40

60

80

100

10100100010000

Log Particle Size (µm)

Cu

mu

lati

ve E

xtra

ctio

n (

%)

Leach #1

Leach #2

Leach #3

Leach #4

Leach #5

Leach #6

Total available Pb

Sample TN1

Sequential leach outcomesPb

0

20

40

60

80

100

10100100010000


Cu

mu

lati

ve E

xtra

ctio

n (

%)

Leach #1

Leach #2

Leach #3

Leach #4

Leach #5

Leach #6

Total available Pb

Sample CR2

1. Mobile heavy metals

2. Easily dissolved heavy metals

3. Heavy metals bound to Mn oxide

4. Heavy metals bound to organic compounds

5. Heavy metals bound to poorly crystalline Fe oxides

6. Heavy metals bound to crystalline Fe oxides

7. Residual heavy metals

Sequential leach outcomes

1. Mobile heavy metals

2. Easily dissolved heavy metals

3. Heavy metals bound to Mn oxide

4. Heavy metals bound to organic compounds

5. Heavy metals bound to poorly crystalline Fe oxides

6. Heavy metals bound to crystalline Fe oxides

7. Residual heavy metals

Zn

0

20

40

60

80

100

10100100010000


Cu

mu

lati

ve E

xtra

ctio

n (

%)

Leach #1

Leach #2

Leach #3

Leach #4

Leach #5

Leach #6

Total available Zn

Sample TN1 Zn

0

20

40

60

80

100

10100100010000


Cu

mu

lati

ve E

xtra

ctio

n (

%)

Leach #1

Leach #2

Leach #3

Leach #4

Leach #5

Leach #6

Total available Zn

Sample CR2

Leach outcomes for the composite

sample (-3.35mm)(cumulative extraction %)

Composite

sample

Leach

#1

Leach

#2

Leach

#3

Leach

#4

Leach

#5

Leach

#6

Leach

#7

CR1 (Pb) 11.8 29.3 32.0 36.2 36.7 37.2 100.0

TN1 (Pb) 15.2 31.5 33.2 36.4 36.7 37.8 100.0

CR1 (Zn) 0.3 0.8 1.0 4.4 11.0 15.0 100.0

TN1 (Zn) 0.2 0.6 0.8 6.0 10.9 13.4 100.0

• ~30% of the Pb in the composite samples was mobile or

easily dissolved, this is compared to only ~0.7% of the

Zn.

Leach outcomes for the composite

sample(cumulative extraction %)

Composite

sample

Leach

#1

Leach

#2

Leach

#3

Leach

#4

Leach

#5

Leach

#6

Leach

#7

CR1 (Pb) 11.8 29.3 32.0 36.2 36.7 37.2 100.0

TN1 (Pb) 15.2 31.5 33.2 36.4 36.7 37.8 100.0

CR1 (Zn) 0.3 0.8 1.0 4.4 11.0 15.0 100.0

TN1 (Zn) 0.2 0.6 0.8 6.0 10.9 13.4 100.0

• ~30% of the Pb in the composite samples was mobile or

easily dissolved, this is compared to only ~0.7% of the

Zn.

Pb at sample site TN

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

0 20 40 60 80 100

Ave

rage

dis

tan

ce

fro

m s

urf

ace

(m

m)

Average cumulative extracted Pb (%)

Mobile

Easily dissolved

Bound to Mn oxides

Bound to organics

Bound to poorlycrystalline Fe oxides

Bound to crystallineFe oxides

Residual heavymetals

Soil/Clay

Mixed Slag/Soil

Mostly Slag


0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

0 10000 20000

Ave

rage

dis

tan

ce

fro

m s

urf

ace

(m

m)

Soil Pb (mg/kg)

TN1 Octile sample

TN2 Octile sample

TN (AVERAGE)

Soil/Clay

Mixed Slag/Soil

Mostly Slag


100

200

300

400

500

600

700

0 10000 20000

Ave

rage

dis

tan

ce

fro

m s

urf

ace

(m

m)

Average cumulative extracted Pb (mg/kg)

TN1 ∑Leach (1-7)

TN2 ∑Leach (1-7)


Mostly slag

Mixed slag/soil

Soil/clay

Pb at sample site TN

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

0 20 40 60 80 100

Avera

ge d

ista

nce

fro

m s

urf

ace

(m

m)

Average cumulative extracted Pb (%)

Mobile

Easily dissolved

Bound to Mn oxides

Bound to organics




Soil/Clay

Mixed Slag/Soil

Mostly Slag


0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

0 10000 20000

Ave

rage

dis

tan

ce

fro

m s

urf

ace

(m

m)

Soil Pb (mg/kg)

TN1 Octile sample

TN2 Octile sample

TN (AVERAGE)

Soil/Clay

Mixed Slag/Soil

Mostly Slag


100

200

300

400

500

600

700

0 10000 20000

Ave

rage

dis

tan

ce

fro

m s

urf

ace

(m

m)

Average cumulative extracted Pb (mg/kg)

TN1 ∑Leach (1-7)

TN2 ∑Leach (1-7)


Mostly slag

Mixed slag/soil

Soil/clay

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

0 10000 20000

Ave

rage

dis

tan

ce

fro

m s

urf

ace

(m

m)

Average extracted Pb (mg/kg)

CR1 ∑Leach (1-7)

CR2 ∑Leach (1-7)

Soil/Clay

Mixed Slag/Soil

Mostly Slag


Pb at sample site CR0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

0 10000 20000

Avera

ge d

ista

nce

fro

m s

urf

ace

(m

m)

Soil Pb (mg/kg)

CR1 Octile sample

CR2 Octile sample

CR (AVERAGE)

Soil/Clay

Mixed Slag/Soil

Mostly Slag


100

200

300

400

500

600

700

0 20 40 60 80 100

Avera

ge d

ista

nce

fro

m s

urf

ace

(m

m)

Average extracted Pb (%)

Mobile

Easily dissolved

Bound to Mn oxides

Bound to organics


Bound to crystalline Feoxides

Residual heavy metals

Soil/Clay

Mixed Slag/Soil

Mostly Slag


0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

0 20 40 60 80 100

Ave

rage

dis

tan

ce

fro

m s

urf

ace

(m

m)

Average extracted Pb (%)

Mobile

Easily dissolved

Bound to Mn oxides

Bound to organics


Bound to crystalline Feoxides

Residual heavy metals

Soil/Clay

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

0 10000 20000

Avera

ge d

ista

nce

fro

m s

urf

ace

(m

m)

Average extracted Pb (mg/kg)

ELB1 ∑Leach (1-7)

ELB2 ∑Leach (1-7)

Soil/Clay

Mixed slag and soil

throughout

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

0 10000 20000

Ave

rage

dis

tan

ce

fro

m s

urf

ace

(m

m)

Soil Pb (mg/kg)

ELB1 Octile sample

ELB2 Octile sample

ELB (AVERAGE)

Soil/Clay

Mixed Slag/Soil

throughout

Pb at sample site ELB

Sampling

Locality

Mobile

(%)

Mobile + Easily

Dissolved (%)

TN 16.1 36.1

CR 7.8 27.0

ELB 0.1 8.4

Percentage of total Pb remaining in the soil column

available to be easily transported into the

environment

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

0 30000 60000 90000

Ave

rage

dis

tan

ce

fro

m s

urf

ace

(m

m)

Soil Zn (mg/kg)

Soil/Clay

Mixed Slag/Soil

Mostly Slag


100

200

300

400

500

600

700

0 20 40 60 80 100

Ave

rage

dis

tan

ce

fro

m s

urf

ace

(m

m)

Extracted Zn (%)

Mobile

Easily dissolved

Bound to Mn oxides

Bound to organics




Soil/Clay

Mixed Slag/Soil

Mostly Slag


Zn at sample site TN

Outcomes from leach testing

The level of mobile and easily extractable Pb (and associated elements) in the smallest size fractions is high;

• Provides a partial explanation (along with surface area) for the high levels of bioaccessibility in the smallest slag fractions;

• Evidence of redistribution and attachment of Pb to other phases as an indicator of metal migration which has already occurred;

• Saline environment seems to have ensured high levels of Pb mobilisation;

• Overall results suggest that around 30% of the available Pb in the slags may migrate over time;

• Elements like Zn held as part of glassy slag are likely to continue to remain relatively immobile.

Conclusions

• Given the work to date the hypothesis that the smelter slag is benign appears to be incorrect

• Mineralogical mapping of the slag materials shows clear evidence that most of the Pb in the slag is not contained within the siliceous glassy matrix but is liberated or accessible

• Liberation allows oxidation and leaching to more easily occur

• Evidence is present that migration of some of the Pb has already occurred and contaminants seem to be leaching from the slag into the underlying stratum

Possible Future Work

• Examine potential leaching rate from existing slag

deposits with different infiltrating fluids

• Look at potential for insitu stabilisation of heavy

metals using phosphate solutions.

• Determine penetration of Pb (and other

contaminants) deep into the subsurface below

existing slag layers

• Look at mobility of lead (and other contaminants )

in sub-surface layers

Policy Implications

• Slag contaminants are likely to continue leaching into the surrounding environment

• In-situ maintenance will be complex and ongoing

• Slag deposits occur on private as well as public property

• Determination of who is responsible for clean-up and rehabilitation is likely to be contentious.

Leach Total = 1.02±0.03[ICP(2012)]R² = 0.97

∑Leach(1-7) = 1.00±0.02[ICP(2012)]R² = 0.99

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

0 5000 10000 15000 20000

ICP

-AE

S (

2014/1

5)

(Pb

) (

pp

m)

ICP-AES-2012 (Pb)(ppm)

Leach Total

∑Leach(1-7)

Pb

Leach Total = 0.97±0.02[ICP(2012)]R² = 0.98

∑Leach(1-7) = 0.97±0.02[ICP(2012)]R² = 0.99

0

30000

60000

90000

0 30000 60000 90000

ICP

-AE

S (

20

14

/15)

(Zn

) (p

pm

)

ICP-AES-2012 (Zn)ppm

Leach Total

∑Leach(1-7)

Zn

Leach Total = 0.94±0.04[ICP(2012)]R² = 0.91

∑Leach(1-7) = 0.97±0.03[ICP(2012)]R² = 0.97

0

2000

4000

6000

0 2000 4000 6000

ICP

-AE

S (

20

14

/15)

(Cu

) (p

pm

)

ICP-AES-2012 (Cu)(ppm)

Leach Total

∑Leach(1-7)

Cu

quantifying access and mobility of toxic elements in nlm ... · quantifying access and mobility of...

Documents