quality of relationships with after-school program staff and child developmental outcomes deborah...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Quality of Relationships with After-School Program Staff and Child Developmental Outcomes Deborah Lowe Vandell, Kim M. Pierce, & Dale Lee Meetings of the](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649cd85503460f949a11de/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Quality of Relationships with After-School Program Staff and Child Developmental Outcomes
Deborah Lowe Vandell, Kim M. Pierce, & Dale Lee
Meetings of the Society for Research in Child Development, Atlanta, GA April 2005
![Page 2: Quality of Relationships with After-School Program Staff and Child Developmental Outcomes Deborah Lowe Vandell, Kim M. Pierce, & Dale Lee Meetings of the](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649cd85503460f949a11de/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Others have documented linkages between teacher-child (T-C) relationships and children’s school adjustment Birch & Ladd (1997)
Higher T-C conflict in K concurrently associated with less school liking and more school avoidance; T-C closeness in K concurrently associated with higher academic achievement and more school liking
Pianta, Steinberg, & Rollins (1995) Positive T-C relationships in K related to reductions in the likelihood of
retention and referrals for at-risk students Hughes, Cavell, & Jackson (1999)
In a sample of highly aggressive children, positive T-C relationships predicted declines in aggression over a 1-year period
Hamre & Pianta (2001) Relational negativity in K predicted lower math and reading achievement,
fewer positive work habits, and more disciplinary infractions in Grades K-4 controlling for gender, ethnicity, verbal IQ, and prior behavior problems
Birch & Ladd (1998) T-C conflict in K predicted declines in prosocial behaviors and increases in
peer reports of aggression in first grade
![Page 3: Quality of Relationships with After-School Program Staff and Child Developmental Outcomes Deborah Lowe Vandell, Kim M. Pierce, & Dale Lee Meetings of the](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649cd85503460f949a11de/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Similar relations have been found in younger children who attend child care
Howes & Hamilton (1993)
Older toddlers who experienced a negative shift in the quality of T-C relationships displayed more aggressive behaviors in child care
Younger toddlers who became more secure displayed relative gains in prosocial behaviors
![Page 4: Quality of Relationships with After-School Program Staff and Child Developmental Outcomes Deborah Lowe Vandell, Kim M. Pierce, & Dale Lee Meetings of the](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649cd85503460f949a11de/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Several processes have been suggested as contributing to these obtained relations Attachment security – Children who are securely attached to their
teachers may feel freer to explore, may be less preoccupied, and may display greater cognitive flexibility
Motivational factors – Children who have more positive relationships with their teachers may like school more and be more attentive to their teachers, which may improve academic performance
Social referents – Children may use teachers’ behaviors as a guide or referent for their own positive (or negative) evaluations of classmates and interactions with classmates
Time and effort allocations – Teachers may expend less time and
effort with students with whom they have conflictual or negative relationships
![Page 5: Quality of Relationships with After-School Program Staff and Child Developmental Outcomes Deborah Lowe Vandell, Kim M. Pierce, & Dale Lee Meetings of the](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649cd85503460f949a11de/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
In this presentation, we extend consideration of adult-child relationships to the related context of after-school programs
Almost 2.5 million children (K-G2) attend after-school programs for 7.5 hr/wk on average (U.S. Department of Education, 2004).
Questions have been raised about the effects of these experiences on academic, social, and behavioral outcomes (see National Research Council, 2002, 2003).
![Page 6: Quality of Relationships with After-School Program Staff and Child Developmental Outcomes Deborah Lowe Vandell, Kim M. Pierce, & Dale Lee Meetings of the](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649cd85503460f949a11de/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Positive relationships between children and program staff are believed to be important, but there has been little systematic study of effects associated with staff-child relationships Pierce, Hamm, & Vandell (1999)
Staff positivity associated with boys displaying fewer internalizing and externalizing problems at school according to first grade teachers
Staff negativity associated with poorer reading and math grades in boys
Vandell & Pierce (2001) Positive caregiving by staff predicted higher academic grades
and better work habits for boys and girls in Grade 3 Supportive relations with staff also predicted less loneliness and
depressive symptoms in Grade 3
![Page 7: Quality of Relationships with After-School Program Staff and Child Developmental Outcomes Deborah Lowe Vandell, Kim M. Pierce, & Dale Lee Meetings of the](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649cd85503460f949a11de/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
The current study uses data from the NICHD Study of Early Child Care to extend the study of staff-child relationships
![Page 8: Quality of Relationships with After-School Program Staff and Child Developmental Outcomes Deborah Lowe Vandell, Kim M. Pierce, & Dale Lee Meetings of the](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649cd85503460f949a11de/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Sampling Plan and Recruitment 10 sites selected by
competitive review of proposals (scientific merit), not on basis of demography.
All births in 24 study hospitals defined the catchment, which is the “reference population of the study.”
Sampling designed to produce unbiased estimates of effects for the catchment while assuring adequate representation of major socio-demographic niches.
Location of Data Collection Sites
![Page 9: Quality of Relationships with After-School Program Staff and Child Developmental Outcomes Deborah Lowe Vandell, Kim M. Pierce, & Dale Lee Meetings of the](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649cd85503460f949a11de/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Sample Demographics
1 Month Grade 1 N=1364 N=137
Child gender % boys 51.7 48.9
Child ethnicity % minority 23.6 20.4
Income-to-needs % poor or near poor 37.9 15.9 Maternal education M years 14.2 15.2
![Page 10: Quality of Relationships with After-School Program Staff and Child Developmental Outcomes Deborah Lowe Vandell, Kim M. Pierce, & Dale Lee Meetings of the](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649cd85503460f949a11de/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Measures of the Family & School Contexts
Family context
Demographic factors: Family structure, maternal education, child gender
Observed mother-child interaction in Grade 1
School context (Grade 1)
Observed instructional quality in the classroom
Observed emotional quality in the classroom
![Page 11: Quality of Relationships with After-School Program Staff and Child Developmental Outcomes Deborah Lowe Vandell, Kim M. Pierce, & Dale Lee Meetings of the](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649cd85503460f949a11de/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Measures of the After-School Context Mother reports
After-school hrs/wk
Program staff reports Childrearing beliefs (Schaefer & Edgerton, 1985)
5-point Likert scales Authoritarian beliefs (30 items; alpha = .90 )
Teacher-Child Relationship Scale (Pianta, 1994) 5-point Likert scales Closeness (8 items; alpha = .84) Conflict (7 items; alpha = .85)
![Page 12: Quality of Relationships with After-School Program Staff and Child Developmental Outcomes Deborah Lowe Vandell, Kim M. Pierce, & Dale Lee Meetings of the](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649cd85503460f949a11de/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Child Developmental Outcomes in Grade 1 Externalizing behavior problems
Mother: Child Behavior Checklist (33 items, alpha = .89) Teacher: Teacher’s Report Form (34 items, alpha = .94)
Social skills: Social Skills Rating System
Mother: 38 items, alpha = .88 Teacher: 30 items, alpha = .93
Academic achievement: Woodcock-Johnson Revised Letter-Word Identification Applied Problems
Academic performance: Mock Report Card Academic grades (6 items, alpha = .93) Work habits (6 items, alpha = .95)
![Page 13: Quality of Relationships with After-School Program Staff and Child Developmental Outcomes Deborah Lowe Vandell, Kim M. Pierce, & Dale Lee Meetings of the](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649cd85503460f949a11de/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Analytic Plan: Hierarchical Multiple Regressions
Block 1
Boys (1=yes)
Single parent (1=yes)
Maternal education
Mother positive caregiving
Classroom instructional quality
Classroom emotional quality
Prior functioning at 54 months
Block 2
Staff-child conflict
Staff-child closeness
Staff childrearing beliefs
Hours in after-school care
![Page 14: Quality of Relationships with After-School Program Staff and Child Developmental Outcomes Deborah Lowe Vandell, Kim M. Pierce, & Dale Lee Meetings of the](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649cd85503460f949a11de/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
RESULTS
Block 1 Block 2Staff-child
conflictStaff-child closeness
Childrearing beliefs
After-school hours
Adj R2 ∆R2 beta beta beta beta
Externalizing (M) .575*** .032* .179* .035 .007 .065
Externalizing (T) .333*** .092** .357* .049 .025 .028
Social skills (M) .351*** .033 -.088 .102 .130 -.026
Social skills (T) .207*** .045 -.241* -.067 -.053 -.003
WJ letter-word .254*** .063* -.162+ .167* -.034 -.099
WJ applied problems .390*** .049* -.148+ .092 -.141+ -.071
Academic grades .190*** .047 -.108 .180* -.002 -.016
Work habits .153*** .024 -.132 -.010 -.106 .052
![Page 15: Quality of Relationships with After-School Program Staff and Child Developmental Outcomes Deborah Lowe Vandell, Kim M. Pierce, & Dale Lee Meetings of the](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649cd85503460f949a11de/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Effect Sizes Associated with Staff-Child Conflict
d r
Externalizing (M) .91 .41
Externalizing (T) 1.35 .56
Social skills (T) -.93 -.42
WJ letter word -.57 -.28
WJ applied problems -.44 -.21
![Page 16: Quality of Relationships with After-School Program Staff and Child Developmental Outcomes Deborah Lowe Vandell, Kim M. Pierce, & Dale Lee Meetings of the](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649cd85503460f949a11de/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Effect Sizes Associated with Staff-Child Closeness
d r
WJ letter-word .54 .26
Academic grades .66 .31
![Page 17: Quality of Relationships with After-School Program Staff and Child Developmental Outcomes Deborah Lowe Vandell, Kim M. Pierce, & Dale Lee Meetings of the](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649cd85503460f949a11de/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
CONCLUSIONS The quality of children’s relationships with after-school program staff
is associated changes in academic, social, and behavioral functioning.
Staff-child closeness predicted relative gains in reading achievement and academic grades. These effects are medium in size, according to Cohen’s rubric. The findings are consistent with other research that has found teacher-child closeness to be associated with gains in academic performance.
Staff-child conflict predicted increases in externalizing problems according to teachers and mothers. These effects were medium to large, according to Cohen’s rubric. These findings are consistent with other research that has found teacher-child conflict to be linked to increased aggression.
Staff-child conflict also predicted decreases in reading and math achievement. This medium-size effect underscores the importance of social relationships for academic outcomes as well as social outcomes.
![Page 18: Quality of Relationships with After-School Program Staff and Child Developmental Outcomes Deborah Lowe Vandell, Kim M. Pierce, & Dale Lee Meetings of the](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649cd85503460f949a11de/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Limitations
Relatively small sample
Correlational design
![Page 19: Quality of Relationships with After-School Program Staff and Child Developmental Outcomes Deborah Lowe Vandell, Kim M. Pierce, & Dale Lee Meetings of the](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649cd85503460f949a11de/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Next Steps
Longer term follow-up of the relations between staff-child relationships and child functioning
Identification of strategies to improve staff-child relationships