quality management partnership title of deck - etouches · pdf filetakeda, johnson &...
TRANSCRIPT
10/4/2014
1
Quality Management PartnershipColonoscopy
Dr. David Morgan, QMP, Colonoscopy Clinical Lead
October 2, 2014
Speaker Bureau:
Pfizer, Merck, Astra Zeneca, Altana, Abbott, Janssen Ortho (JOI), Negma,
Novartis, Scherring, Axcan, Wyeth, Proctor & Gamble, Solvay, Takeda,
Johnson & Johnson
Consultant:
Pfizer, Merck, Astra Zeneca, Altana, Abbott, Janssen Ortho (JOI), Negma,
Novartis, Scherring, Axcan, Wyeth, Proctor & Gamble, Solvay, Ferring,
Takeda, Johnson & Johnson, Kellog’s
Research Funding:
Heart and Stroke Foundation, Astra, JOI, Altana, Novartis, Pfizer, Negma,
Aptalis,
Conflict of Interest Disclosure:
D Morgan MD MSc FRCPC
The Times They are a Changing!
The Ontario MOHLTC is changing the how
colonoscopy is funded.
10/4/2014
2
10/4/2014
3
10/4/2014
4
10/4/2014
5
MOHLTC & Health System Reform
As part of the health system funding reform initiative, MOHLTC has identified a list of Quality-Based Procedures (QBPs). This list includes colonoscopy (for all indications).
Funding for QBPs will be linked to quality frameworks beginning in fiscal year 2013/14.
MOHLTC established Clinical Expert Advisory Groups to guide the development of the quality frameworks
OHP: Background
~25% of colonoscopies done in OHPs (2010)
OHPs are regulated under the Medicine Act (April
2010)
CPSO assesses OHPs
Plan for integration into CCC program
Plan to change OHPs to IHFs
14
Quality Management Partnership Overview
Quality Management Partnership 16
10/4/2014
6
Quality Management Partnership
Quality Management Partnership 17
The partnership between the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario (CPSO) and Cancer Care Ontario (CCO) was established by the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care in March 2013
CPSO CCO
Quality Management Partnership
(QMP)
QMP: Driving Forces
A series of quality and patient safety incidents across Canada
Variation in the quality of care in hospitals and in the community
Variation in the ability for facilities and system administrators to proactively identify quality concerns
Ontario’s Action Plan for Health (2012) and the focus on quality across the health system
18
19Quality Management Partnership
Quality Management Partnership Mandate
Work closely with stakeholders to develop and implement credible, comprehensive quality
management programs for identified healthcare services, beginning with colonoscopy,
mammography, and pathology
Improve patient care by driving continuous quality improvements and fostering efficiency and
integration across the provider, organizational, and system levels
10/4/2014
7
Quality Management Partnership 20
Five Program Elements
• How do we define quality? 1. Quality
Framework
• How do we measure and report on quality?
2. Quality Reporting
• How do we make sure we are meeting minimum standards?
3. Quality Assurance
• How do we drive for excellence?4. Quality
Improvement
• Can we improve quality by re-considering how we deliver this service?
5. Quality by Design
Quality Management Partnership 20
All Quality Management Programs will include five elements,
although each health service will do so in its own way…
Link to QBP and Community-Based settings strategy
Quality Management Partnership 21
Improve cost-effectiveness of
services using best practice
guidelines
Reduce practice variation and
improve patient outcomes among
providers
Improve accountability within the
System for providing best practice
Services
Improve effectiveness of the funding
model in future funding years
Fund GI Endoscopy service providers for
providing best practice services
Provide best practice GI Endoscopy
services to Ontarians (via development of
interim facility and provider standards and a GI
Endo QBP clinical pathway)
Monitor and evaluate success of QBP via
provincial, regional and facility reporting (funding and quality measures)
Implement Year 1 of GI Endoscopy
Funding Model
QBP Long Term
ObjectivesQBP Short Term Objectives
As of April 1, 2014 CCO is responsible for allocating funds for all GI Endoscopy.
Partnership alignment
QMP Link to the GI Endoscopy Community-Based Clinics Strategy
Quality Management Partnership 22
Develop and implement program for
GI-Endoscopy community-based
settings
Identify high-quality community-
based service providers in the field
Fund GI Endoscopy community-based
settings for providing best practice services
Inform quality based selection criteria and
evaluation approach to support the
selection of GI-Endoscopy community-
based settings
Long Term Objectives Short Term Objectives
CCO is working with the Ministry of Health and Long Term Care to develop a
strategy to shift appropriate GI-Endoscopy hospital volumes to community based
settings.
Partnership alignment
10/4/2014
8
Quality Management Partnership: MOHLTC Reports
Phase 1 (September 2013 to March 2014): Engage Expert Advisory Panels to start the design of provincial quality management programs and identify some Early Quality Initiatives that could be initiated in the short-term to move Ontario forward with quality management programs.
The Phase 1 report was submitted to the MOHLTC in March 2014.
Phase 2 (April 2014 to March 2015): Continue the design of the provincial quality management programs, conduct stakeholder consultations on program design, and initiate the Early Quality Initiatives (if approved by the MOHLTC), and develop a high level implementation plan.
The Phase 2 report will be submitted to the MOHLTC in March 2015.
23
Quality Management Partnership Colonoscopy Early Quality Initiatives
Quality Management Partnership 24
Early Quality Initiative Criteria
Projects that can be initiated in 2014/15
Projects that move Ontario forward in building the comprehensive quality management programs
Projects that will have strong stakeholder support
Projects that feasible from IM/IT perspective
Projects that are feasible from Legs & Regs perspective
Each project was presented to stakeholders for review and feedback
Additional stakeholder input will also be obtained at critical junctures.
Quality Management Partnership 25
10/4/2014
9
Early Quality Initiatives
The Partnership Colonoscopy Expert Advisory Panel has identified the following early quality initiatives: 1. Bowel Preparations Dosing Reference Card
2. Guidelines for Standardized Endoscopy Report for Referring Providers
3. Guidelines for Standardized Patient Discharge Information
4. Pre-Procedure and Post-Procedure Checklists
5. Launch a Version 1 of a Physician Performance Report for Colonoscopy
Quality Management Partnership 26
Preliminary assessments to include:1. IM & IT feasibility
2. Legislative and regulatory feasibility
3. Broad stakeholder support
1. Bowel Preparations Dosing Reference Card
Project Description:
Develop and disseminate a bowel preparation “dosing reference card” for referring physicians, endoscopists and perhaps pharmacists that does not remove the decision-making from providers, but assists them in choosing the most appropriate prep based on a patient’s current health state, age, co-morbidities etc.
Project Benefits:
a) May result in better compliance and better outcomes
b) May reduce the need for recall examinations because the prep is more effective
c) May improve integration of pre-procedure and procedure, benefitting both patients and providers
d) May result in optimization of resources (in this case, most appropriate prep) to achieve desired outcomes
Quality Management Partnership 27
2. Standardized Endoscopy Report
Project Description:
Develop and trial a standardized endoscopy report template for referring providers. Currently there is wide variation in reporting among physicians and centres. There are several guidelines and policy documents describing the importance of standardized colonoscopy reporting to facilitate clear communications between providers as well as to contribute to quality improvement programs.
Project Benefits:
a) May result in an improved continuum of care for patients
b) May reduce repeated examinations due to lacking information determining the quality of examination, including bowel preparation quality and specific cecal landmarks
c) May reduce inappropriate decisions for the timing of surveillance colonoscopy because the key polyp descriptors (size and/or morphology) are absent
d) May reduce uncertainty about the follow-up arrangements and the provider who is responsible for follow-up
e) Referring providers will benefit from this quick win – they can send patients to different endoscopists and get back very similar narrative in terms of structure and description.
Quality Management Partnership 28
10/4/2014
10
3. Standardized Patient Discharge Information
Project Description:
Develop and trial guidelines for standardized discharge information for patients. The reports trial would engage an initial cohort. The project would begin in 2014/15 but extend into 2015/16 to ensure time for uptake, utilization and impact evaluation.
This early initiative acknowledges the effects of anaesthesia and anxiety on patients post-colonoscopy. There is evidence that sedation causes impaired memory retention (amnesia), which causes people to forget post-procedure instructions (e.g., do not resume taking NSAIDs or aspirin 14 days following colonoscopy) and follow-up appointments (Hayes, 2001)
The goals and objectives are to improve patient compliance with follow-up, ensure the patient understands what to do if problems arise, and to reduce anxiety.
Quality Management Partnership 29
Project Benefits: a) Improved patient recall of endoscopy findings and recommendations,
b) Better patient compliance with follow-up recommendations, c) Decreased patient anxiety,
d) Better knowledge about how to obtain final endoscopy results,
e) Improved patient understanding of what to do if problems arise post-colonoscopy.
4. Pre-Procedure and Post-Procedure Checklists
Project Description:
Develop and trial pre- and post-procedure checklists in OHPs and hospitals. Checklists have been used traditionally in the aviation industry as a standard safety measure. Research within that industry has illustrated that errors with significant impact on safety often relate to non-technical skills rather than technical ability. A study by Haynes et al (N Engl J Med 2009;360:491-9) in the New England Journal of Medicine on Surgical Safety Checklists demonstrated that checklists could be very valuable in reducing complication rates, including death.
Quality Management Partnership 30
Project Benefits:
a) Build assurance that patients are receiving the same standard of care throughout the province
b) Team members will benefit by not having to rely only on “memory” to ensure that all steps pre and post procedure are covered.
c) Patients will benefit with an added level of safety and standardization for the procedure.
5. Physician Performance Report
Project Description:
Develop and trial a physician performance report for colonoscopy in 2014/15. A physician performance report will provide regular feedback to allow self and peer comparison and to encourage continuous skills improvement for all providers.
The physician performance report would not be a decision tool, but rather an assessment tool –a regular “snapshot” - to inform skills development.
This early initiative includes selection of appropriate measures, identification of targets where applicable, design/language elements and trial. There are significant IM/IT considerations associated with this early initiative, so it is anticipated that several trials and evaluations will be conducted before system-wide implementation occurs.
Quality Management Partnership 31
Project Benefits: a) Avoiding, preventing and ameliorating adverse outcomes through feedback activities
that identify areas where skills could be improved
b) Responsive and timely feedback for all providers to inform their practice and QI activities
c) No opting-out – all physicians have access to feedback and comparison against their peers, whether high-performing or low-performing.
10/4/2014
11
Ongoing and Upcoming Panel work
Quality Management Partnership 32
Review of current states
Colonoscopy standards
Reporting standards
Quality Indicators
QA / QI tools and initiatives
Recommendations for standards and reports
Provider, Facility
Recommendations for the Quality Management Model (system implementation)
Consultation with Stakeholders
The Partnership’s Proposed Quality Management Model:
Quality Management Partnership 33
Provincial Lead: Responsible for providing
provincial quality management program oversight
for colonoscopy quality in Ontario.
Regional Leads: Responsible for providing
provincial quality management program oversight
for colonoscopy quality within their region and
providing support to Facility Leads.
Facility Leads: Responsible for providing
provincial quality management program oversight
and accountable for the quality of care for
colonoscopies provided within their facility.
Quality Management Model
Quality Management Partnership 34
10/4/2014
12
Phase 2 Broad Panel Recommendations:
Quality Management Partnership 35
All facilities should adhere to a common set of standards based on the
Out of Hospital Premises Inspection Program.
All scope technicians must participate in a formalized training program
(beyond the training provided by manufacturers).
All facilities must participate in a common quality assurance program that
includes regular inspections and assessments.
All facilities must use the Global Rating Scale (GRS) as a quality
assurance/ quality improvement tool. Implementation of this should be
thoughtful, gradual and well supported, with financial and educational
resources. Implementation of this tool will be carefully planned to ensure
appropriate support is provided.
A centralized, electronic repository should be developed to include past
procedural reports and relevant pathology findings, as well as images
and/or video related to the procedure.
All facilities must adopt both electronic and synoptic reporting, and that
the implementation of these methods of reporting where they do not
currently exist is implemented thoughtfully and with proper support.
Facility Report Indicator Recommendations:
Quality Management Partnership 36
Cecal intubation rate
Colonoscopies performed by endoscopists meeting volume standard
Adherence to CCC Screening Program Wait Times
Adherence to CCC Screening Program Wait Times
Tier I and Tier II Adverse Events
Patient Satisfaction
Facility Report Indicators cont…
Quality Management Partnership 37
Patient Satisfaction using a standardized tool such as the GRS, starting with the following indicators (but expected to expand):
• Measures of the patients’ ability to provide feedback
• Aftercare experience
• Equality of access
• Timeliness
10/4/2014
13
Provider Report Indicators
Quality Management Partnership 38
Colonoscopy Volume
Bowel Prep
Polypectomy Rate
Cecal Intubation Rate
Polypectomy Associated Bleeding Rate
Outpatient Perforations
Detected CRC Rate
Post Colonoscopy CRC Diagnosis
Adenoma Detection Rate
Ongoing Partnership Work
Quality Management Partnership 39
Recommendations for QI
Complete recommendations for reporting structure
Review and assess consultation results
Complete Phase II recommendations for report
Contact Information
Dr. David Morgan
Colonoscopy Clinical Lead, Quality Management Partnership
email: [email protected]
Laura Silver
Project Manager, Quality Management Partnership
Email: [email protected]
Partnership website
www.qmpontario.ca
Quality Management Partnership 40