quality and equity in education

15
Quality and Equity in Education March 6, 2008 john a. powell Williams Chair in Civil Rights & Civil Liberties, Moritz College of Law & Director, Kirwan Institute for the Study of Race and Ethnicity

Upload: kirwan-institute-for-the-study-of-race-and-ethnicity

Post on 05-Dec-2014

413 views

Category:

Education


4 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Quality and Equity in Education

Quality and Equity in EducationMarch 6, 2008

john a. powellWilliams Chair in Civil Rights & Civil Liberties, Moritz College of Law & Director, Kirwan Institute for the Study of Race and Ethnicity

Page 2: Quality and Equity in Education

Education: Reframing the Issues

Education and democratic purpose Importance of institutional arrangements Education reform for the benefit of ALL

students, not just those historically disadvantaged

What is true integration?

Page 3: Quality and Equity in Education

Goals of Education

What are our educational goals? The mission statement for the US Department of

Education includes ensuring equal access to education and promoting educational excellence throughout the nation.

The U.S. Supreme Court has identified the objectives of public education as “the inculcation of fundamental values necessary for the maintenance of a

democratic political system.”

Page 4: Quality and Equity in Education

What are our requirements for a legitimate democratic state? All citizens must be members of society Membership must be attainable for all through public

education There must be freedom for individuals to join the

civil discourse Structures and outcomes must be in line with the

collective ethics of the populace. There must be real opportunity for change…

Membership must have meaning!

Membership in a Legitimate Democratic State

Page 5: Quality and Equity in Education

Importance of institutional arrangements…

Lower EducationalOutcomes for Urban

School Districts

Increased Flightof Affluent

Families fromUrban Areas

Neighborhood (Housing)

Segregation

SchoolSegregation(Economic)

Page 6: Quality and Equity in Education

Challenges for Public Education

Economic segregation Racial segregation Achievement gap Discipline rates Funding disparities Graduation rates

Page 7: Quality and Equity in Education

Challenge: Correlation of Race and School Poverty (Ohio example)

Page 8: Quality and Equity in Education

Poverty and academic performance (Ohio example, 2003-2004)

% of StudentsProficient or ExceedingStandards

Non-HighPovertySchools

HighPovertySchools

Reading 3rd Grade 84.7% 62.7%Read 4th Grade 83.2% 55.6%Reading 5th Grade 84.1% 54.0%Reading 6th Grade 78.1% 51.6%Reading 8th Grade 83.8% 55.0%

% of StudentsProficient or ExceedingStandards

Non-HighPovertySchools

HighPovertySchools

Math 3rd Grade 78.4% 46.3%Math 4th Grade 72.8% 46.8%Math 6th Grade 71.1% 40.1%Math 7th Grade 66.5% 26.9%Math 8th Grade 68.3% 26.0%

Page 9: Quality and Equity in Education

School Segregation Today: Segregation and Student Poverty

School Segregation and Students Eligible for Receiving Free and Reduced Lunch

88.581.2 81.2

58.4

48.3 46.1

37.6

65.1% 63.8%

80.1%

46.3% 46.6%

34.7% 35.3%

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

80.0

90.0

100.0

Dis

sim

ilar

ity

Sco

re

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

Per

cen

t S

tud

ents

Eli

gib

le

Segregation:DissimilarityScore

Free andReduced Lunch (%) 99

Page 10: Quality and Equity in Education

School Segregation Today: Segregation and Student Performance

School Segregation and Student Performance 2003

83.981.2

70.7

58.4

37.6

14.0%

10.0%

15.0%

22.0%

32.0%

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

80.0

90.0

Chicago Cleveland Boston San Diego Charlotte

Dis

sim

ilar

ity

Sco

re

0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

Per

cen

t E

xcee

din

g o

r E

xcel

lin

g

Segregation:DissimilarityScore

Percent Exceeding or Excelling at Reading (4th)

Page 11: Quality and Equity in Education

Integration vs. Desegregation

“The word segregation represents a system that is prohibitive; it denies the Negro equal access to schools, parks, restaurants, libraries and the like. Desegregation is eliminative and negative...”

“Integration is creative, and is therefore more profound and far-reaching than desegregation. Integration is the positive acceptance of desegregation...”

“Integration is genuine intergroup, interpersonal doing. Desegregation then, rightly, is only a short-range goal. Integration is the ultimate goal of our national community.”

Source: Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. “The Ethical Demands of Integration.” December 27, 1962.

Page 12: Quality and Equity in Education

Integration into Opportunity

Segregation is more than just the physical isolation of people

Segregation is isolation from opportunity or opportunity structures

Integration is not just about bringing in more people.

Integration into opportunity

Page 13: Quality and Equity in Education

“Helps students avoid or overcome stereotypes by providing a range of experiences and viewpoints…;

Promotes cross-cultural understanding and helps students develop interpersonal skills for a multiracial world;

Prepares students for a racially diverse workplace; Trains and educates a diverse group of leaders; Contributes to better decision making on issues affecting

our multicultural society; Fosters diversity among civic and business leaders.”

The Benefits of Racial Diversity in Education

Source: “Preserving Diversity in Higher Education: A Manual on Admissions Policies and Procedures After the University of Michigan Decisions.” Compiled by the firms of Bingham McCutcheon, Morrison & Foerster, and Heller Ehrman White & McAuliffe. Equal Justice Society, 2004. <www.equaljusticesociety.org/compliancemanual>

Page 14: Quality and Equity in Education

True Integration Creative and respective of inter-group relations based on

mutuality, equality and fairness Transformative rather than assimilative Transforms and enriches the mainstream

(cf. desegregation, at best, attempts to assimilate “minorities” into the mainstream)

Page 15: Quality and Equity in Education

Appendix:Parents Involved…the decision Five different opinions Majority of Court recognized a compelling

government interest in remedying racial isolation, regardless of its cause.

Educational policymakers may use race-conscious policies. They may not classify people on the basis of race, except as a last resort.

Effects on school districts and our work