qiaolin(charlie) zhang, prof. kameshwar poolla, prof...

1
1 3 2 4 6 5 7 9 8 10 12 11 FLCC Workshop April 6, 2005 Acknowledgment Funded by Advanced Micro Devices, Applied Materials, ASML, Atmel, Cadence, Canon, Cymer, Cypress, DuPont, Ebara, Hitachi Global Storage Technologies, Intel, KLA- Tencor, Mentor Graphics, Nikon Research, Novellus Systems, Panoramic Technologies, Photronics, Synopsys, Tokyo Electron, and the UC Discovery Grant. • Minimax finds optimal offsets W i is the weighting factor for CD target i CD Uniformity Control Across Litho-etch Sequence Qiaolin(Charlie) Zhang , Prof. Kameshwar Poolla, Prof. Costas Spanos, UC Berkeley Motivation Multi-zone PEB Bake Plate 2005 Main Objectives Develop Inspection (DI) CDU Control Our Approach The Problem Simulation Results of DI CDU Control FI CDU Control Simulation - Bowl Plasma Signature Final Inspection (FI) CDU Control Simultaneous CDU Control for Multiple CD Targets Future Goals Simultaneous CDU Control for Multiple CD Targets Across-wafer CD uniformity (CDU) is critical for: Advanced logic devices, MPU and memory Yield improvement Etch tool sets have limited control authority to address spatial non-uniformity. Dual-zone He chuck is often the only knob Litho tool sets have much more control authority to address spatial non-uniformity. Multi-zone PEB bake plate Variable dose settings at exposure How can we improve the across-wafer CDU and what is the maximum CDU we can achieve? Poor Across-Wafer CD Uniformity Processing Tool Etch Etch Wafer Litho Litho Compensate for systematic across-wafer CD variation sources across the litho-etch sequence using all available control authority : Exposure step: die to die dose PEB step: temperature of multi-zone bake plate Etch: backside pressure of dual-zone He chuck Exposure PEB / Develop Etch Wafer-level CD Metrology Optimizer Scatterometry/CDSEM dose temperature He pressure PEB step is critical due to chemically amplified resist Spatially programmable bake plate is introduced into PEB to enable PEB temperature uniformity Initial modeling studies for CD Uniformity control (done) Assess controllability of various actuator settings in the litho-etch sequence for reduction of CD non-uniformity. Select processing sequence. Building sensitivity model. Assess potential DI & FI CDU improvement (done) Based on CD offset model Based on temperature offset model Complete preliminary experimental study for CD non- uniformity reducing across the litho-etch sequence (ongoing) Assess predictive capability of mode, and build optimizing software to compute optimal changes in control parameters. Provide proof of concept test of CD non-uniformity reduction scheme based on direct CD metrology. Official milestone: Complete preliminary experimental study for CD non-uniformity reducing across the litho- etch sequence. Assess predictive capability of mode, and build optimizing software to compute optimal changes in control parameters. Provide proof of concept test of CD non-uniformity reduction scheme based on direct CD metrology. Schematic setup of multi-zone bake plate (approximate) 2 4 3 6 5 7 1 • DI CD is a function of zone offsets baseline resist DI CD S T CD + = ( ) ( )= = 7 2 1 7 2 1 1 1 ... , ... ... , ... O O O g O O O g T T T m m baseline T T T = ( ) ( )= = 7 2 1 7 2 1 1 1 ... , ... ... , ... O O O f O O O f CD CD CD n n DI • Seen as a constrained nonlinear programming problem • Minimize • Subject to: Up i Low O O O et t DI T et t DI CD CD CD CD arg arg 7 ... 2 , 1 = i 69% 61% 72% CDU Improvement Isolated Line Semi-isolated Line Dense Line Dense Line Semi-isolated Line Isolated Line Experimentally extracted baseline DI CDU Simulated optimal DI CDU after applying PEB tuning • Across-wafer FI CD is function of zone offsets • Minimize: et t FI T et t FI CD CD CD CD arg arg DI FI s p CD CD CD = _ = + = ) ... , ( ... ) ... , ( 7 2 1 7 2 1 1 _ O O O g O O O g CD CD CD n s p DI FI • Plasma etch signature: Up i Low O O O • Subject to: 7 ... 2 , 1 = i -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 Assumed bowl shape plasma etch signature Dense Semi-isolated Isolated Simulated baseline FI CD Simulated corrected DI CD after PEB tuning Simulated optimal FI CD after PEB tuning 65% 57% 68% FI CDU Improvement Isolated Semi-isolated Dense Note that DI CDU may actually worsen! 62.6% 32.4% 60.1% Wd = 0.05; Ws =0.05 ; Wi =0.90 54.1% 54.7% 48.2% Wd = 0.05; Ws =0.90 ; Wi =0.05 61.8% 15.9% 66.8% Wd = 0.90; Ws =0.05 ; Wi =0.05 58.4% 44.7% 62.9% Wd =0.36; Ws =0.33 ; Wi =0.31 Iso Line Semi-iso Line Dense Line Simulation of simultaneous CDU control for dense, semi-iso and iso lines Dense Semi-isolated Isolated Simulated baseline FI CD Simulated optimal FI CD after PEB tuning ))) ( ( max ( min arg O F W O i i i O opt = 2 _ i i i T CD CD F = • It is good to have simultaneous CDU control for multiple CD targets • Formulated as a minimax optimization problem

Upload: others

Post on 22-Jun-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Qiaolin(Charlie) Zhang, Prof. Kameshwar Poolla, Prof ...cden.ucsd.edu/internal/.../poster/FLCC_poster_2005... · • Minimax finds optimal offsets • W i is the weighting factor

1 32

4 65

7 98

10 1211

FLCC

WorkshopApril 6, 2005

AcknowledgmentFunded by Advanced Micro Devices, Applied Materials, ASML, Atmel, Cadence, Canon, Cymer, Cypress, DuPont, Ebara, Hitachi Global Storage Technologies, Intel, KLA-Tencor, Mentor Graphics, Nikon Research, NovellusSystems, Panoramic Technologies, Photronics, Synopsys, Tokyo Electron, and the UC Discovery Grant.

• Minimax finds optimal offsets

• Wi is the weighting factor for CD target i

CD Uniformity Control Across Litho-etch SequenceQiaolin(Charlie) Zhang, Prof. Kameshwar Poolla, Prof. Costas Spanos, UC Berkeley

Motivation

Multi-zone PEB Bake Plate

2005 Main Objectives

Develop Inspection (DI) CDU ControlOur Approach

The Problem

Simulation Results of DI CDU Control FI CDU Control Simulation - Bowl Plasma Signature

Final Inspection (FI) CDU Control

Simultaneous CDU Control for Multiple CD Targets Future GoalsSimultaneous CDU Control for

Multiple CD TargetsGoal

• Across-wafer CD uniformity (CDU) is critical for:– Advanced logic devices, MPU and memory– Yield improvement

• Etch tool sets have limited control authority to address spatial non-uniformity.– Dual-zone He chuck is often the only knob

• Litho tool sets have much more control authority to address spatial non-uniformity.– Multi-zone PEB bake plate– Variable dose settings at exposure How can we improve the across-wafer CDU and what

is the maximum CDU we can achieve?

Poor Across-Wafer CD Uniformity

Processing Tool

EtchEtch

Wafer

LithoLitho

• Compensate for systematic across-wafer CD variation sources across the litho-etch sequence using all available control authority:– Exposure step: die to die dose– PEB step: temperature of multi-zone bake plate– Etch: backside pressure of dual-zone He chuck

Exposure PEB /Develop Etch

Wafer-levelCD MetrologyOptimizer

Scatterometry/CDSEM

dose temperature He pressure

• PEB step is critical due to chemically amplifiedresist

• Spatially programmable bake plate is introduced into PEB to enable PEB temperature uniformity

Initial modeling studies for CD Uniformity control (done)Assess controllability of various actuator settings in the litho-etch sequence for reduction of CD non-uniformity. Select processing sequence.Building sensitivity model.

Assess potential DI & FI CDU improvement (done)Based on CD offset modelBased on temperature offset model

• Complete preliminary experimental study for CD non-uniformity reducing across the litho-etch sequence (ongoing)• Assess predictive capability of mode, and build optimizing

software to compute optimal changes in control parameters.• Provide proof of concept test of CD non-uniformity reduction

scheme based on direct CD metrology.

• Official milestone: Complete preliminary experimental study for CD non-uniformity reducing across the litho-etch sequence.– Assess predictive capability of mode, and build optimizing

software to compute optimal changes in control parameters.– Provide proof of concept test of CD non-uniformity reduction

scheme based on direct CD metrology.

Schematic setup of multi-zone bake plate

(approximate)

24

36

5 71

• DI CD is a function of zone offsets

baselineresistDI CDSTCD→→→

+∆=

( )

( )⎥⎥⎥

⎢⎢⎢

⎡=

⎥⎥⎥

⎢⎢⎢

⎡=

721

72111

...,...

...,...

OOOg

OOOg

T

TT

mm

baselineTTT→→→

−=∆

( )

( )⎥⎥⎥

⎢⎢⎢

⎡=

⎥⎥⎥

⎢⎢⎢

⎡=

721

72111

...,...

...,...

OOOf

OOOf

CD

CDCD

nn

DI

• Seen as a constrained nonlinear programming problem• Minimize• Subject to: Up

iLow OOO ≤≤

⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛ −⎟

⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛ −

→→→→

ettDI

T

ettDI CDCDCDCD argarg

7...2,1=i

69%61%72%CDU ImprovementIsolated LineSemi-isolated LineDense Line

Optimal DI CD

Dense Line Semi-isolated Line Isolated Line

Optimal DI CDOptimal DI CD

Experimentally extracted

baseline DI CDU

Simulated optimal DI CDU after applying

PEB tuning

• Across-wafer FI CD is function of zone offsets

• Minimize: ⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛ −⎟

⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛ −

→→→→

ettFI

T

ettFI CDCDCDCD argarg

DIFIsp CDCDCD→→∆→

−=∆ _

⎥⎥⎥

⎢⎢⎢

⎡=∆+=

→→→

)...,(...

)...,(

721

7211

_

OOOg

OOOgCDCDCD

n

spDIFI

• Plasma etch signature:

Upi

Low OOO ≤≤• Subject to: 7...2,1=i

-5

-4

-3

-2

-1

Assumed bowl shape plasma etch signature

Dense Semi-isolated Isolated

Simulated baseline FI CD

Simulated corrected DI CD after PEB tuning

Simulated optimal FI CD after PEB

tuning

65%57%68%FI CDU ImprovementIsolatedSemi-isolated Dense

Note that DI CDU may actually worsen!

62.6%32.4%60.1%Wd = 0.05; Ws =0.05 ; Wi =0.90

54.1%54.7%48.2%Wd = 0.05; Ws =0.90 ; Wi =0.05

61.8%15.9%66.8%Wd = 0.90; Ws =0.05 ; Wi =0.05

58.4%44.7%62.9% Wd =0.36; Ws =0.33 ; Wi =0.31 Iso LineSemi-iso LineDense Line

Simulation of simultaneous CDU control for dense, semi-iso and iso lines

Dense Semi-isolated Isolated

Simulated baseline FI CD

Simulated optimal FI CD after PEB

tuning

)))((max(minarg OFWO iiiO

opt =

2_ iii TCDCDF −=

• It is good to have simultaneous CDU control for multiple CD targets

• Formulated as a minimax optimization problem