qiang zhao institute of high energy physics, cas
DESCRIPTION
Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS. Property of first orbital excitation baryons. Qiang Zhao Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS and Theoretical Physics Center for Science Facilities (TPCSF), CAS. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Qiang Zhao Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56813a2c550346895da212c0/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Qiang Zhao
Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS
and Theoretical Physics Center for Science Facilities (TPCSF), CAS
Property of first orbital excitation baryons
Property of first orbital excitation baryons
Workshop on Hadron Physics in China and JLAB 12 GeV Upgrade, Lanzhou University, August 01, 2009
Institute of High Energy Physics, CASInstitute of High Energy Physics, CAS
![Page 2: Qiang Zhao Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56813a2c550346895da212c0/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Outline
How many L=1 baryon states are we expecting and how many have been seen?
A revisit to the state mixing (S and D-wave) and implication of their structures
Strong coupling
S-wave contributions in –p n and K–p 00
EM coupling
Summary
![Page 3: Qiang Zhao Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56813a2c550346895da212c0/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
1. Baryons in SU(6)O(3) symmetric quark model
Spin
Flavor
Spin-flavor
Spatial
Basic assumptions:i) Chiral symmetry spantaneous breaking leads to the presence of massive
constituent quarks as effective degrees of freedom inside hadrons;ii) Hadrons can be viewed as quark systems in which the gluon fields
generate effective potentials that depend on the spins and positions of the massive quarks.
Color
Baryon wavefunction as representation of 3-dimension permutation group:
s, , , a
symmetric
![Page 4: Qiang Zhao Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56813a2c550346895da212c0/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
PDG2004: 22 nucleon resonances (uud, udd)
(**) not well-established
![Page 5: Qiang Zhao Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56813a2c550346895da212c0/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
18 Lambda resonances (uds)
![Page 6: Qiang Zhao Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56813a2c550346895da212c0/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Some selection rules in the symmetric quark model
• Moorhouse selection rule (Moorhouse, PRL16, 771 (1966))
EM transition of groundstate 0+ (1/2+) first excited state 1 (1/2, 3/2, 5/2)
The first orbital excitation states (non-strange) seem to be well-established:
![Page 7: Qiang Zhao Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56813a2c550346895da212c0/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
• selection rule (Zhao & Close, PRD74, 094014(2006)) in strong decays
• Faiman-Hendry selection rule (Faiman & Hendry, PR173, 1720 (1968)).
Isgur, Karl, & Koniuk, PRL41, 1269(1978)
N* (p,n)
![Page 8: Qiang Zhao Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56813a2c550346895da212c0/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
2. Spin-dependent potential from one-gluon-exchange (OgE) and SU(6)O(3) symmetry breaking
Introduces mass splittings and configuration mixings in the SU(6) multiplets.
Nucleon:
Moorhouse selection rule must be violated !
![Page 9: Qiang Zhao Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56813a2c550346895da212c0/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Selection rule violations
58 1343 12+15 9+19 8
PDG2008
Isgur, Karl, & Koniuk, PRL41, 1269(1978)
![Page 10: Qiang Zhao Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56813a2c550346895da212c0/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Both S11(1535) and S11(1650) are not pure SU(6) states.
PDG2008
![Page 11: Qiang Zhao Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56813a2c550346895da212c0/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
selection rule violation
Hyperfine interaction in (uds) is relatively suppressed compared with that in nucleon due to the heavier s-quark
In the constitute regime, the wavefunction will be dominated by |56, 2 8>. One expects relatively smaller configuration mixings from |70, 2 8>. Hence
Approximately hold !
D15(1675) K
F17(1990) K
?
?
![Page 12: Qiang Zhao Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56813a2c550346895da212c0/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
If the selection rule holds approximately, all states of [70, 4 8] will not contribute to production channel. – Ideal place to disentangle baryon resonances.
PDG2008
A coherent study of pK and nK0would be useful for distinguishing conventional QM states and states beyond 3q scenario.
![Page 13: Qiang Zhao Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56813a2c550346895da212c0/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
2. A revisit to the S-wave state mixing
The mixing angles will be correlated with the off-diagonal transition matrix element, which will then be connected with the experimental data for N* N M as a leading contribution.
N
![Page 14: Qiang Zhao Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56813a2c550346895da212c0/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Questions: Can we take the naïve quark model seriously here? What is the success and what is the failure?
A list to check:1) Mass spectrum2) Couplings to the same final states, e.g. N, N, N, K, K
, …3) Excitations in photo and electroproduction4) Excitations in meson-baryon scatterings5) … …
![Page 15: Qiang Zhao Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56813a2c550346895da212c0/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
arXiv: 0810.0997[nucl-th] by Aznauryan, Burkert and Lee.
It is important to have a correct definition of the common sign of amplitudes and relative sign between helicity amplitudes, i.e. A1/2, A3/2, and S1/2.
N*
![Page 16: Qiang Zhao Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56813a2c550346895da212c0/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
p S11 (1535): 3q picture
Opposite sign
of S1/2!!!
LF RQM:
Capstick, Keister,
PR D51 (1995) 3598
Pace, Simula et.al.,
PR D51 (1995) 3598
Combined with the difficultiesin the description of large width of S11(1535) N and largeS11(1535) N,K couplings, this shows that 3q picture for S11(1535) should be complemented
Impossible to change in quark
model !!!
From I. Aznauryan, Electromagnetic N-N* Transition Form Factors Workshop, 2008
![Page 17: Qiang Zhao Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56813a2c550346895da212c0/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
What are the difficulties in the description of the couplings for S11(1535) and S11(1650) N, N, K, and K?
What does the mixing tell about the S and D-wave resonance photo- and hadronic excitations?
What are the mixing effects on the helicity amplitudes?
![Page 18: Qiang Zhao Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56813a2c550346895da212c0/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
(I) A chiral quark model for quark-meson interactions
![Page 19: Qiang Zhao Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56813a2c550346895da212c0/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
![Page 20: Qiang Zhao Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56813a2c550346895da212c0/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Nonrelativistic operator: i, Mi, Pi
f, Mf, Pf
M, q
With the baryons described by the SU(6)O(3):
Strong decay couplings
and
![Page 21: Qiang Zhao Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56813a2c550346895da212c0/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
![Page 22: Qiang Zhao Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56813a2c550346895da212c0/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
By comparing the quark model amplitude with the hadronic one, we can extract the N*NM coupling form factor with fixed signs:
![Page 23: Qiang Zhao Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56813a2c550346895da212c0/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
With the data from PDG2008:
![Page 24: Qiang Zhao Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56813a2c550346895da212c0/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
![Page 25: Qiang Zhao Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56813a2c550346895da212c0/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
The couplings for S11K and S11K are not necessarily zero even though the kinematics are not allowed.
The relative signs for the gN*NM/gNNM vertices are determined by the quark model which is useful for extracting the helicity amplitudes.
The resonance relative signs can be examined in hadronic productions such as –p n.
is given by Liu and Zou with 5q contributions. See also Zou’s talk.
![Page 26: Qiang Zhao Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56813a2c550346895da212c0/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
S-channel resonance excitations in hadronic productions
Zhong, Zhao, He, and Saghai, PRC76, 065205 (2007)
![Page 27: Qiang Zhao Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56813a2c550346895da212c0/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
, q, k
N, Pi N, Pf
, k , q
N, PfN, Pi
+N() ()
N() ()
s-channels-channel
Refs.Zhao, Li, & Bennhold, PLB436, 42(1998); PRC58, 2393(1998);Zhao, Didelez, Guidal, & Saghai, NPA660, 323(1999); Zhao, PRC63, 025203(2001); Zhao, Saghai, Al-Khalili, PLB509, 231(2001); Zhao, Al-Khalili, & Bennhold, PRC64, 052201(R)(2001); PRC65, 032201(R) (2002);
![Page 28: Qiang Zhao Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56813a2c550346895da212c0/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
, k
N, Pi N, Pf
, q
+
, q, k
N, Pi N, PfN() ()
N() ()
u-channelu-channel
, k , q
N, Pi N, Pf
a0
t-channelt-channel
![Page 29: Qiang Zhao Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56813a2c550346895da212c0/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
S-channel transition amplitude with quark level operators
Non-relativistic expansion:
![Page 30: Qiang Zhao Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56813a2c550346895da212c0/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
with
![Page 31: Qiang Zhao Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56813a2c550346895da212c0/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
quark level hadron level
Define g-factors:
![Page 32: Qiang Zhao Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56813a2c550346895da212c0/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
, q, k
N, Pi N, Pf
, k , q
N, PfN, Pi
+N() ()
N() ()
s-channels-channel
Compared with Ms3, amplitude Ms
2 is relatively suppressed by a factor of (-1/2)n for each n.
Higher excited states are relatively suppressed by (kq/32)n/n!
One can identify the quark motion correlations between the initial and final state baryon
Similar treatment can be done for the u channel
![Page 33: Qiang Zhao Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56813a2c550346895da212c0/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Separate out individual resonances
![Page 34: Qiang Zhao Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56813a2c550346895da212c0/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
![Page 35: Qiang Zhao Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56813a2c550346895da212c0/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
In the SU(6) symmetry limit,
![Page 36: Qiang Zhao Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56813a2c550346895da212c0/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Features of this approach
Advantage: i) A complete set of NRCQM resonances is included with very few
parameters as leading contributions. ii) The same parameters for the production of SU(3) multiplets. iii) The same framework for meson photoproduction turns out to be
successful.
Disadvantage: Neither covariant nor unitary.
![Page 37: Qiang Zhao Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56813a2c550346895da212c0/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Goldberger-Treiman relation:
Model parameters
![Page 38: Qiang Zhao Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56813a2c550346895da212c0/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Differential cross sections
Left panel: Solid: full calculation Dot-dashed: without nucleon Born term
Right panel: Solid: full calculation Dotted lines: exclusive S11(1535) Dot-dashed: without S11(1650) Dashed: without t-channel
![Page 39: Qiang Zhao Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56813a2c550346895da212c0/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Left panel: Solid: full calculation Dot-dashed: without nucleon Born term Dashed: without D13(1520)
Right panel: Solid: full calculation Dotted lines: exclusive S11(1535) Dot-dashed: without S11(1650) Dashed: without t-channel
![Page 40: Qiang Zhao Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56813a2c550346895da212c0/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Total cross sections
S11(1535) is dominant near threshold. The exclusive cross section is even larger than the data.
S11(1650) has a destructive interference with the S11(1535), and appears to be a dip in the total cross section.
States from n=2 shell account for the second enhancement around 1.7 GeV.
Zhong, Zhao, He, and Saghai, PRC76, 065205 (2007)
![Page 41: Qiang Zhao Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56813a2c550346895da212c0/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
S-channel resonance excitations in K–p 0 0
Ref. Zhong and Zhao, PRC79, 045202 (2009)
![Page 42: Qiang Zhao Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56813a2c550346895da212c0/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
We thus determine the mixing angle by experimental data which requires
![Page 43: Qiang Zhao Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56813a2c550346895da212c0/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
![Page 44: Qiang Zhao Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56813a2c550346895da212c0/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
![Page 45: Qiang Zhao Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56813a2c550346895da212c0/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
s-channels-channel
=0
is the only s-channel amplitude
K– (su)
p
U-channel turns to be important
![Page 46: Qiang Zhao Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56813a2c550346895da212c0/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
EM helicity amplitudes after mixing
![Page 47: Qiang Zhao Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56813a2c550346895da212c0/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
![Page 48: Qiang Zhao Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56813a2c550346895da212c0/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
The mixing between the quark model representations can explain the large S11 couplings to N, N, K. But not as large as that proposed for 5-quark scenario by Zou and Riska.
The S11(1535) and S11(1650) appear to have destructive interferences in photo and hadronic productions of which the relative sign can be given by the quark model. This seems to be consistent with the coupled-channel results by Shklyar et al.
In the real photon limit, the transverse helicity amplitudes seem to be consistent with the mixings determined in hadronic decays. But the magnitude at large Q2 region is much lower than the data just as been found in many other studies.
The longitudinal one has a reversed sign which is impossible to be explained by the leading EM operator in 3q framework and/or the mixing due to Moorhouse selection rule.
Some mechanisms seem indeed to have been missed by the NRCQM
3. Summary
![Page 49: Qiang Zhao Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56813a2c550346895da212c0/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
![Page 50: Qiang Zhao Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56813a2c550346895da212c0/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Thanks for your attention !