q1 support to fill in the application form · q1 support to fill in the application form answered:...

25
1.52% 2 4.55% 6 38.64% 51 34.09% 45 21.21% 28 Q1 Support to fill in the application form Answered: 132 Skipped: 0 TOTAL 132 poor fair good very good not applicable/ ... 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES poor fair good very good not applicable/ I didn't ask for it 1 / 25 Benchmarking evaluation 17 - 18

Upload: others

Post on 30-Jul-2020

13 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Q1 Support to fill in the application form · Q1 Support to fill in the application form Answered: 132 Skipped: 0 TOTAL 132 poor fair good very good not applicable/ ... 0% 10% 20%

1.52% 2

4.55% 6

38.64% 51

34.09% 45

21.21% 28

Q1 Support to fill in the application formAnswered: 132 Skipped: 0

TOTAL 132

poor

fair

good

very good

notapplicable/ ...

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES

poor

fair

good

very good

not applicable/ I didn't ask for it

1 / 25

Benchmarking evaluation 17 - 18

Page 2: Q1 Support to fill in the application form · Q1 Support to fill in the application form Answered: 132 Skipped: 0 TOTAL 132 poor fair good very good not applicable/ ... 0% 10% 20%

4.55% 6

9.85% 13

37.88% 50

47.73% 63

0.00% 0

Q2 Quality of the information supplied before the course on the websiteAnswered: 132 Skipped: 0

TOTAL 132

poor

fair

good

very good

not applicable

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES

poor

fair

good

very good

not applicable

2 / 25

Benchmarking evaluation 17 - 18

Page 3: Q1 Support to fill in the application form · Q1 Support to fill in the application form Answered: 132 Skipped: 0 TOTAL 132 poor fair good very good not applicable/ ... 0% 10% 20%

0.76% 1

7.58% 10

18.94% 25

63.64% 84

9.09% 12

Q3 Sufficient and immediate answers to your personal mailsAnswered: 132 Skipped: 0

TOTAL 132

poor

fair

good

very good

not applicable

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES

poor

fair

good

very good

not applicable

3 / 25

Benchmarking evaluation 17 - 18

Page 4: Q1 Support to fill in the application form · Q1 Support to fill in the application form Answered: 132 Skipped: 0 TOTAL 132 poor fair good very good not applicable/ ... 0% 10% 20%

5.43% 7

25.58% 33

14.73% 19

54.26% 70

Q4 Was it useful to take part in the video conference (zoom.us) beforethe course

Answered: 129 Skipped: 3

TOTAL 129

fair

useful

very useful

I didn't takepart

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES

fair

useful

very useful

I didn't take part

4 / 25

Benchmarking evaluation 17 - 18

Page 5: Q1 Support to fill in the application form · Q1 Support to fill in the application form Answered: 132 Skipped: 0 TOTAL 132 poor fair good very good not applicable/ ... 0% 10% 20%

32.03% 41

11.72% 15

19.53% 25

16.41% 21

5.47% 7

14.84% 19

Q5 Which course did you attendAnswered: 128 Skipped: 4

TOTAL 128

Week 3 SeptHelsinki /...

Week 10 SeptHelsinki /...

Week 15 AprilHelsinki /...

Week 22 AprilHelsinki /...

15-21 AprilBenchmarking...

22-28 AprilGame-Based...

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES

Week 3 Sept Helsinki / Helsinki+Tallinn

Week 10 Sept Helsinki / Helsinki+Tallinn

Week 15 April Helsinki / Helsinki+Tallinn

Week 22 April Helsinki / Helsinki+Tallinn

15-21 April Benchmarking with headteachers Helsinki/Porvoo

22-28 April Game-Based learning Helsinki/Tallinn. Use this questionnaire in points applicable for your course

5 / 25

Benchmarking evaluation 17 - 18

Page 6: Q1 Support to fill in the application form · Q1 Support to fill in the application form Answered: 132 Skipped: 0 TOTAL 132 poor fair good very good not applicable/ ... 0% 10% 20%

1.52% 2

19.70% 26

41.67% 55

37.12% 49

Q6 Quality of the course programme (in general)Answered: 132 Skipped: 0

TOTAL 132

poor

fair

good

very good

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES

poor

fair

good

very good

6 / 25

Benchmarking evaluation 17 - 18

Page 7: Q1 Support to fill in the application form · Q1 Support to fill in the application form Answered: 132 Skipped: 0 TOTAL 132 poor fair good very good not applicable/ ... 0% 10% 20%

Q7 Programme in Helsinki. You have had presentations on differenttopics e.g. Innovation, school management, support for students etc.

Mention shortly in the comment box which presentation was mostinteresting for you and what you have learnt from it.

Answered: 105 Skipped: 27

7 / 25

Benchmarking evaluation 17 - 18

Page 8: Q1 Support to fill in the application form · Q1 Support to fill in the application form Answered: 132 Skipped: 0 TOTAL 132 poor fair good very good not applicable/ ... 0% 10% 20%

Q8 Programme in Helsinki. You have observed lessons. What did youlearn most from the observations.

Answered: 107 Skipped: 25

8 / 25

Benchmarking evaluation 17 - 18

Page 9: Q1 Support to fill in the application form · Q1 Support to fill in the application form Answered: 132 Skipped: 0 TOTAL 132 poor fair good very good not applicable/ ... 0% 10% 20%

10.40% 13

21.60% 27

46.40% 58

21.60% 27

Q9 Methodology of the course. Was there a good balance between the 4parts of the course (presentations, classroom observations, sharing

information, working on own outcomes).Answered: 125 Skipped: 7

TOTAL 125

poor

fair

good

very good

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES

poor

fair

good

very good

9 / 25

Benchmarking evaluation 17 - 18

Page 10: Q1 Support to fill in the application form · Q1 Support to fill in the application form Answered: 132 Skipped: 0 TOTAL 132 poor fair good very good not applicable/ ... 0% 10% 20%

3.31% 4

9.09% 11

43.80% 53

42.98% 52

0.83% 1

Q10 learnt about the various characteristics of the Finnish educationalsystem

Answered: 121 Skipped: 11

TOTAL 121

poor

fair

good

very good

not applicable

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES

poor

fair

good

very good

not applicable

10 / 25

Benchmarking evaluation 17 - 18

Page 11: Q1 Support to fill in the application form · Q1 Support to fill in the application form Answered: 132 Skipped: 0 TOTAL 132 poor fair good very good not applicable/ ... 0% 10% 20%

Q11 Only for participants who had programme in Tallinn. You haveobserved lessons. What did you learn most from the observations.

Answered: 116 Skipped: 16

11 / 25

Benchmarking evaluation 17 - 18

Page 12: Q1 Support to fill in the application form · Q1 Support to fill in the application form Answered: 132 Skipped: 0 TOTAL 132 poor fair good very good not applicable/ ... 0% 10% 20%

Q12 Only for participants who had programme in Tallinn. You have had apresentation in Tallinn university. Mention shortly in the comment box

what you have learnt from this presentation.Answered: 109 Skipped: 23

12 / 25

Benchmarking evaluation 17 - 18

Page 13: Q1 Support to fill in the application form · Q1 Support to fill in the application form Answered: 132 Skipped: 0 TOTAL 132 poor fair good very good not applicable/ ... 0% 10% 20%

21.37% 28

41.98% 55

36.64% 48

Q13 To what extent did the course programme meet your expectations ingeneral?

Answered: 131 Skipped: 1

TOTAL 131

moderately

much

very much

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES

moderately

much

very much

13 / 25

Benchmarking evaluation 17 - 18

Page 14: Q1 Support to fill in the application form · Q1 Support to fill in the application form Answered: 132 Skipped: 0 TOTAL 132 poor fair good very good not applicable/ ... 0% 10% 20%

Q14 The KA1 application insists on creating outputs to be deliveredduring the course. To what extent are you satsified with your outputs on:

Answered: 131 Skipped: 1

3.82%5

21.37%28

71.76%94

3.05%4

131

6.87%9

16.79%22

67.94%89

8.40%11

131

poor fair good not applicable

Recommendationsfor your own...

Presentationof your own...

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

POOR FAIR GOOD NOT APPLICABLE TOTAL

Recommendations for your own school

Presentation of your own school

14 / 25

Benchmarking evaluation 17 - 18

Page 15: Q1 Support to fill in the application form · Q1 Support to fill in the application form Answered: 132 Skipped: 0 TOTAL 132 poor fair good very good not applicable/ ... 0% 10% 20%

1.52% 2

4.55% 6

28.79% 38

40.15% 53

23.48% 31

1.52% 2

Q15 The course encouraged me to adopt a more reflective approach tothe way I teach/ carry out my duties on teaching/ working

Answered: 132 Skipped: 0

TOTAL 132

no impact

small impact

medium impact

high impact

verysignificant...

not applicable

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES

no impact

small impact

medium impact

high impact

very significant impact

not applicable

15 / 25

Benchmarking evaluation 17 - 18

Page 16: Q1 Support to fill in the application form · Q1 Support to fill in the application form Answered: 132 Skipped: 0 TOTAL 132 poor fair good very good not applicable/ ... 0% 10% 20%

3.85% 5

9.23% 12

30.00% 39

40.77% 53

15.38% 20

0.77% 1

Q16 The course increased my awareness of new methods of assessing/giving credit for skills or competences acquired in school / project work

Answered: 130 Skipped: 2

TOTAL 130

no impact

small impact

medium impact

high impact

verysignificant...

not applicable

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES

no impact

small impact

medium impact

high impact

very significant impact

not applicable

16 / 25

Benchmarking evaluation 17 - 18

Page 17: Q1 Support to fill in the application form · Q1 Support to fill in the application form Answered: 132 Skipped: 0 TOTAL 132 poor fair good very good not applicable/ ... 0% 10% 20%

8.40% 11

6.87% 9

25.95% 34

37.40% 49

17.56% 23

3.82% 5

Q17 The course improved my foreign language competenciesAnswered: 131 Skipped: 1

TOTAL 131

no impact

small impact

medium impact

high impact

verysignificant...

not applicable

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES

no impact

small impact

medium impact

high impact

very significant impact

not applicable

17 / 25

Benchmarking evaluation 17 - 18

Page 18: Q1 Support to fill in the application form · Q1 Support to fill in the application form Answered: 132 Skipped: 0 TOTAL 132 poor fair good very good not applicable/ ... 0% 10% 20%

4.58% 6

9.92% 13

22.14% 29

35.88% 47

22.90% 30

4.58% 6

Q18 The course encouraged me to use more ICT in the classroomAnswered: 131 Skipped: 1

TOTAL 131

no impact

small impact

medium impact

high impact

verysignificant...

not applicable

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES

no impact

small impact

medium impact

high impact

very significant impact

not applicable

18 / 25

Benchmarking evaluation 17 - 18

Page 19: Q1 Support to fill in the application form · Q1 Support to fill in the application form Answered: 132 Skipped: 0 TOTAL 132 poor fair good very good not applicable/ ... 0% 10% 20%

5.34% 7

5.34% 7

29.77% 39

41.98% 55

16.03% 21

1.53% 2

Q19 The course refreshed my attitude towards teaching/ the subjecttaught

Answered: 131 Skipped: 1

TOTAL 131

no impact

small impact

medium impact

high impact

verysignificant...

not applicable

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES

no impact

small impact

medium impact

high impact

very significant impact

not applicable

19 / 25

Benchmarking evaluation 17 - 18

Page 20: Q1 Support to fill in the application form · Q1 Support to fill in the application form Answered: 132 Skipped: 0 TOTAL 132 poor fair good very good not applicable/ ... 0% 10% 20%

0.76% 1

3.03% 4

12.12% 16

37.12% 49

46.21% 61

0.76% 1

Q20 The course updated my knowledge of other countries/ cultures/education systems

Answered: 132 Skipped: 0

TOTAL 132

no impact

small impact

medium impact

high impact

verysignificant...

not applicable

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES

no impact

small impact

medium impact

high impact

very significant impact

not applicable

20 / 25

Benchmarking evaluation 17 - 18

Page 21: Q1 Support to fill in the application form · Q1 Support to fill in the application form Answered: 132 Skipped: 0 TOTAL 132 poor fair good very good not applicable/ ... 0% 10% 20%

1.52% 2

0.76% 1

16.67% 22

37.88% 50

42.42% 56

0.76% 1

Q21 The course motivated me to carry on developing my professionalskills in the future

Answered: 132 Skipped: 0

TOTAL 132

no impact

small impact

medium impact

high impact

verysignificant...

not applicable

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES

no impact

small impact

medium impact

high impact

very significant impact

not applicable

21 / 25

Benchmarking evaluation 17 - 18

Page 22: Q1 Support to fill in the application form · Q1 Support to fill in the application form Answered: 132 Skipped: 0 TOTAL 132 poor fair good very good not applicable/ ... 0% 10% 20%

3.03% 4

9.09% 12

26.52% 35

31.82% 42

25.76% 34

3.79% 5

Q22 The course led or will lead to establishing partnerships/ co-operationwith schools represented at the training event

Answered: 132 Skipped: 0

TOTAL 132

no impact

small impact

medium impact

high impact

verysignificant...

not applicable

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES

no impact

small impact

medium impact

high impact

very significant impact

not applicable

22 / 25

Benchmarking evaluation 17 - 18

Page 23: Q1 Support to fill in the application form · Q1 Support to fill in the application form Answered: 132 Skipped: 0 TOTAL 132 poor fair good very good not applicable/ ... 0% 10% 20%

Q23 How did you find out about this course? Please specify: did you findit on internet (which site); or in the course catalogue of School Education

Gateway; or did you hear from other teachers or headmaster; other?Answered: 127 Skipped: 5

23 / 25

Benchmarking evaluation 17 - 18

Page 24: Q1 Support to fill in the application form · Q1 Support to fill in the application form Answered: 132 Skipped: 0 TOTAL 132 poor fair good very good not applicable/ ... 0% 10% 20%

40.91% 54

43.94% 58

13.64% 18

1.52% 2

Q24 Give a mark for the in-service training activity (content andmethodology)Answered: 132 Skipped: 0

TOTAL 132

very good

good

fair

poor

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES

very good

good

fair

poor

24 / 25

Benchmarking evaluation 17 - 18

Page 25: Q1 Support to fill in the application form · Q1 Support to fill in the application form Answered: 132 Skipped: 0 TOTAL 132 poor fair good very good not applicable/ ... 0% 10% 20%

Q25 General commentsAnswered: 92 Skipped: 40

25 / 25

Benchmarking evaluation 17 - 18