q1 support to fill in the application form · q1 support to fill in the application form answered:...
TRANSCRIPT
1.52% 2
4.55% 6
38.64% 51
34.09% 45
21.21% 28
Q1 Support to fill in the application formAnswered: 132 Skipped: 0
TOTAL 132
poor
fair
good
very good
notapplicable/ ...
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
poor
fair
good
very good
not applicable/ I didn't ask for it
1 / 25
Benchmarking evaluation 17 - 18
4.55% 6
9.85% 13
37.88% 50
47.73% 63
0.00% 0
Q2 Quality of the information supplied before the course on the websiteAnswered: 132 Skipped: 0
TOTAL 132
poor
fair
good
very good
not applicable
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
poor
fair
good
very good
not applicable
2 / 25
Benchmarking evaluation 17 - 18
0.76% 1
7.58% 10
18.94% 25
63.64% 84
9.09% 12
Q3 Sufficient and immediate answers to your personal mailsAnswered: 132 Skipped: 0
TOTAL 132
poor
fair
good
very good
not applicable
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
poor
fair
good
very good
not applicable
3 / 25
Benchmarking evaluation 17 - 18
5.43% 7
25.58% 33
14.73% 19
54.26% 70
Q4 Was it useful to take part in the video conference (zoom.us) beforethe course
Answered: 129 Skipped: 3
TOTAL 129
fair
useful
very useful
I didn't takepart
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
fair
useful
very useful
I didn't take part
4 / 25
Benchmarking evaluation 17 - 18
32.03% 41
11.72% 15
19.53% 25
16.41% 21
5.47% 7
14.84% 19
Q5 Which course did you attendAnswered: 128 Skipped: 4
TOTAL 128
Week 3 SeptHelsinki /...
Week 10 SeptHelsinki /...
Week 15 AprilHelsinki /...
Week 22 AprilHelsinki /...
15-21 AprilBenchmarking...
22-28 AprilGame-Based...
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Week 3 Sept Helsinki / Helsinki+Tallinn
Week 10 Sept Helsinki / Helsinki+Tallinn
Week 15 April Helsinki / Helsinki+Tallinn
Week 22 April Helsinki / Helsinki+Tallinn
15-21 April Benchmarking with headteachers Helsinki/Porvoo
22-28 April Game-Based learning Helsinki/Tallinn. Use this questionnaire in points applicable for your course
5 / 25
Benchmarking evaluation 17 - 18
1.52% 2
19.70% 26
41.67% 55
37.12% 49
Q6 Quality of the course programme (in general)Answered: 132 Skipped: 0
TOTAL 132
poor
fair
good
very good
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
poor
fair
good
very good
6 / 25
Benchmarking evaluation 17 - 18
Q7 Programme in Helsinki. You have had presentations on differenttopics e.g. Innovation, school management, support for students etc.
Mention shortly in the comment box which presentation was mostinteresting for you and what you have learnt from it.
Answered: 105 Skipped: 27
7 / 25
Benchmarking evaluation 17 - 18
Q8 Programme in Helsinki. You have observed lessons. What did youlearn most from the observations.
Answered: 107 Skipped: 25
8 / 25
Benchmarking evaluation 17 - 18
10.40% 13
21.60% 27
46.40% 58
21.60% 27
Q9 Methodology of the course. Was there a good balance between the 4parts of the course (presentations, classroom observations, sharing
information, working on own outcomes).Answered: 125 Skipped: 7
TOTAL 125
poor
fair
good
very good
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
poor
fair
good
very good
9 / 25
Benchmarking evaluation 17 - 18
3.31% 4
9.09% 11
43.80% 53
42.98% 52
0.83% 1
Q10 learnt about the various characteristics of the Finnish educationalsystem
Answered: 121 Skipped: 11
TOTAL 121
poor
fair
good
very good
not applicable
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
poor
fair
good
very good
not applicable
10 / 25
Benchmarking evaluation 17 - 18
Q11 Only for participants who had programme in Tallinn. You haveobserved lessons. What did you learn most from the observations.
Answered: 116 Skipped: 16
11 / 25
Benchmarking evaluation 17 - 18
Q12 Only for participants who had programme in Tallinn. You have had apresentation in Tallinn university. Mention shortly in the comment box
what you have learnt from this presentation.Answered: 109 Skipped: 23
12 / 25
Benchmarking evaluation 17 - 18
21.37% 28
41.98% 55
36.64% 48
Q13 To what extent did the course programme meet your expectations ingeneral?
Answered: 131 Skipped: 1
TOTAL 131
moderately
much
very much
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
moderately
much
very much
13 / 25
Benchmarking evaluation 17 - 18
Q14 The KA1 application insists on creating outputs to be deliveredduring the course. To what extent are you satsified with your outputs on:
Answered: 131 Skipped: 1
3.82%5
21.37%28
71.76%94
3.05%4
131
6.87%9
16.79%22
67.94%89
8.40%11
131
poor fair good not applicable
Recommendationsfor your own...
Presentationof your own...
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
POOR FAIR GOOD NOT APPLICABLE TOTAL
Recommendations for your own school
Presentation of your own school
14 / 25
Benchmarking evaluation 17 - 18
1.52% 2
4.55% 6
28.79% 38
40.15% 53
23.48% 31
1.52% 2
Q15 The course encouraged me to adopt a more reflective approach tothe way I teach/ carry out my duties on teaching/ working
Answered: 132 Skipped: 0
TOTAL 132
no impact
small impact
medium impact
high impact
verysignificant...
not applicable
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
no impact
small impact
medium impact
high impact
very significant impact
not applicable
15 / 25
Benchmarking evaluation 17 - 18
3.85% 5
9.23% 12
30.00% 39
40.77% 53
15.38% 20
0.77% 1
Q16 The course increased my awareness of new methods of assessing/giving credit for skills or competences acquired in school / project work
Answered: 130 Skipped: 2
TOTAL 130
no impact
small impact
medium impact
high impact
verysignificant...
not applicable
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
no impact
small impact
medium impact
high impact
very significant impact
not applicable
16 / 25
Benchmarking evaluation 17 - 18
8.40% 11
6.87% 9
25.95% 34
37.40% 49
17.56% 23
3.82% 5
Q17 The course improved my foreign language competenciesAnswered: 131 Skipped: 1
TOTAL 131
no impact
small impact
medium impact
high impact
verysignificant...
not applicable
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
no impact
small impact
medium impact
high impact
very significant impact
not applicable
17 / 25
Benchmarking evaluation 17 - 18
4.58% 6
9.92% 13
22.14% 29
35.88% 47
22.90% 30
4.58% 6
Q18 The course encouraged me to use more ICT in the classroomAnswered: 131 Skipped: 1
TOTAL 131
no impact
small impact
medium impact
high impact
verysignificant...
not applicable
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
no impact
small impact
medium impact
high impact
very significant impact
not applicable
18 / 25
Benchmarking evaluation 17 - 18
5.34% 7
5.34% 7
29.77% 39
41.98% 55
16.03% 21
1.53% 2
Q19 The course refreshed my attitude towards teaching/ the subjecttaught
Answered: 131 Skipped: 1
TOTAL 131
no impact
small impact
medium impact
high impact
verysignificant...
not applicable
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
no impact
small impact
medium impact
high impact
very significant impact
not applicable
19 / 25
Benchmarking evaluation 17 - 18
0.76% 1
3.03% 4
12.12% 16
37.12% 49
46.21% 61
0.76% 1
Q20 The course updated my knowledge of other countries/ cultures/education systems
Answered: 132 Skipped: 0
TOTAL 132
no impact
small impact
medium impact
high impact
verysignificant...
not applicable
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
no impact
small impact
medium impact
high impact
very significant impact
not applicable
20 / 25
Benchmarking evaluation 17 - 18
1.52% 2
0.76% 1
16.67% 22
37.88% 50
42.42% 56
0.76% 1
Q21 The course motivated me to carry on developing my professionalskills in the future
Answered: 132 Skipped: 0
TOTAL 132
no impact
small impact
medium impact
high impact
verysignificant...
not applicable
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
no impact
small impact
medium impact
high impact
very significant impact
not applicable
21 / 25
Benchmarking evaluation 17 - 18
3.03% 4
9.09% 12
26.52% 35
31.82% 42
25.76% 34
3.79% 5
Q22 The course led or will lead to establishing partnerships/ co-operationwith schools represented at the training event
Answered: 132 Skipped: 0
TOTAL 132
no impact
small impact
medium impact
high impact
verysignificant...
not applicable
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
no impact
small impact
medium impact
high impact
very significant impact
not applicable
22 / 25
Benchmarking evaluation 17 - 18
Q23 How did you find out about this course? Please specify: did you findit on internet (which site); or in the course catalogue of School Education
Gateway; or did you hear from other teachers or headmaster; other?Answered: 127 Skipped: 5
23 / 25
Benchmarking evaluation 17 - 18
40.91% 54
43.94% 58
13.64% 18
1.52% 2
Q24 Give a mark for the in-service training activity (content andmethodology)Answered: 132 Skipped: 0
TOTAL 132
very good
good
fair
poor
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
very good
good
fair
poor
24 / 25
Benchmarking evaluation 17 - 18
Q25 General commentsAnswered: 92 Skipped: 40
25 / 25
Benchmarking evaluation 17 - 18