pv and fc ieee paper
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: PV and FC IEEE Paper](https://reader038.vdocuments.mx/reader038/viewer/2022100500/54337834219acd5e1a8b489e/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
POWER MANAGEMENT AND POWER FLOW CONTROL
OF THE MICROGRID CONNECTED PV-FC HYBRID
SYSTEM
* S Yogendra Reddy S Bharat
Electrical Engineering. PNC & VIET Electrical Engineering. PNC & VIET
Guntur, India Guntur, India
[email protected] [email protected]
Abstract— This paper proposes a method for Power Generation
in the Smart Grid will be based on Photovoltaic (PV) array and
a Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell (PEMFC) mainly due to
the high penetration level of distributed renewable power
generators. Starting from electricity generation to its
transmission and storage with the ability to respond to dynamic
changes in energy supply through cogeneration and demand
adjustments. Decentralized Generation, storage and intelligence
are key components of a smart microgrid. In this paper, we
examine the significant role that build to play in energy use and
its management in a Smart Microgrid. We discuss how can be
enhanced and interfaced with the smart microgrid. The impact of
DC side Voltage fluctuation of the DGs and DG tripping on
power sharing is also investigated. The efficacy of the proposed
control arrangement has been validated through simulation for
various operating conditions. The model of the microgrid power
system is simulated in MATLAB.
Keywords- Photovoltaic array, Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel
Cell, & DC side Voltage Fluctuation.
I. INTRODUCTION
The ever increasing energy consumption, the soaring cost
and the exhaustible nature of fossil fuel, and the worsening
global environment have created increased interest in green
[renewable and/or fuel cell (FC)-based energy sources] power
generation systems. The growth of wind and photovoltaic
(PV) power generation systems has exceeded the most
optimistic estimation. FCs also show great potential to be
green power sources of the future because of many merits
they have (such as high efficiency, zero or low emission of
pollutant gases, and flexible modular structure) and the rapid
progress in FC technologies.
A new control strategy based on optimal usage of FC systems.
Different works have done to show the dynamic behavior and
power management of hybrid power generation. The effect of
dynamic behavior of FC system in transient event such as step
load and variation of load demand in hybrid power generation
in long duration of time.
In this paper, power management and power flow control of
hybrid system is proposed .The proposed system comprise PV
and FC system. The main goal of this paper is to show the
dynamic behavior of PV/FC System.
The paper is organized as follows. The system configuration is
discussed in Section II. The system component characteristics
are given in Section III. Section IV discusses the overall power
management strategy for the system. Section V gives the
simulation results. Section VI concludes the paper.
II. SYSTEM CONFIGURATION
Overall system configuration of proposed hybrid
renewable power generation and storage system are shown in
Fig.1. The studied system includes PV/FC as power generate-
on. Each system is connected to the DC link with appropriate
power electronics devices.
Fig .1. System configuration of the hybrid system
III. SYSTEM COMPONENT CHARACTERISTICS
To develop an overall power management strategy for the
system and to investigate the system performance, dynamic
models for the main components in the proposed hybrid
system have been developed using MATLAB/Simulink. The
models are for the following: PV and FC.
![Page 2: PV and FC IEEE Paper](https://reader038.vdocuments.mx/reader038/viewer/2022100500/54337834219acd5e1a8b489e/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
A. Photovoltaic
PV effect is a basic physical process through which solar
energy is converted directly into electrical energy. The
physics of a PV cell, or a solar cell, is similar to the classical
p-n junction diode .The relationship between the output
voltage V and the load current I of a PV cell or a module
can be expressed as
…………………(1)
where IL is the light current of the PV cell (in amperes),
I0 is the saturation current, I is the load current, V is the
PV output voltage (in volts), Rs is the series resistance of
the PV cell (in ohms), and α is the thermal voltage timing
completion factor of the cell (in volts).
The I–V characteristic curves of the PV model used in
this study under different irradiances (at 25 ◦ C) are given in
Fig. 2. It is noted from the figure that the higher the
irradiance, the larger are the short-circuit current (Isc) and
the open-circuit voltage (Voc). As a result, the larger will be
the output PV power. Temperature plays an important role in
the PV performance because the four parameters (IL, I0,
Rs, and α) in (1) are all functions of temperature. The
effect of the temperature on the PV model performance is
illustrated in Fig. 2. It is noted from the figure that the lower
the temperature, the higher is the maximum power and the
larger the open circuit voltage.
Fig.2. The I-V & P-V CURVES.
Decentralized configuration as show in Fig.3., the PVs are arranged in smaller modules independent of each other
and each connected to a common bus. The common bus
could be of different types: DC, low voltage AC or the
grid. The result has shown, not surprisingly, that one
central inverter gives the highest energy efficiency and
lowest cost, provided no shading effects are taken into
account.
Fig.3. Decentralized configuration
B. FC Power Generation System
Fuel cell power generation system is used as reliable
alternative power generation. To solve this problem different
form of renewable power generation such as FC system are
used as hybrid system to enhance the reliability of whole
system.
Among different types of FC systems, PEMFC has some
advantages such as high power density, high efficiency and
also have lower temperature. The PEMFC models have been
presented in different based on relationship between output
voltage and partial pressure of hydrogen, oxygen and water.
Fig. 4 shows the chemical reaction of PEMFC system that
occurred inside the cell.
Fig.4. Schematic diagram of a PEMFC
![Page 3: PV and FC IEEE Paper](https://reader038.vdocuments.mx/reader038/viewer/2022100500/54337834219acd5e1a8b489e/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
However, FC system have different and effective problem
such as slow dynamic and need hydrogen as fuel
continuously. In the previous works, the dynamic behavior of
FC system is neglected and FC system is simulated without
its slow dynamic. In this paper a new control strategy based
on FC system protection is proposed. The proposed control
Strategy has two important advantages. First it can simulate
the actual dynamic behavior of FC system. Second, this
control strategy is simple and economical way for protection
of FC system. This control strategy is based on coordination
of FC system and the dynamic behavior of utilization factor.
This control strategy can keep the utilization factor in its
optimal value by synchronizing of between FC system and
power electronic interfacing. The proposed control strategy is
implemented in hybrid power management.
The dynamic behavior of fuel valve is simulated as first
order lead-lag transfer function and is applied to the power
electronic interfacing through reference power of FC system.
With this control strategy, the hydrogen consumed by FC
stack is equal to the hydrogen that is injected by hydrogen
fuel valve.
The overall control strategy that is used for FC system is
shown in Fig.5.
Fig.5. Overall control strategy used for FC system
IV. POWER MANAGEMENT
An overall control strategy for power management among
different energy sources in a multisource energy system is
needed. Fig.6. shows the block diagram of the overall
control strategy for the proposed hybrid alternative energy
system. PV electricity generation unit, controlled by a
maximum power point tracking (MPPT) controller are the
main energy sources of the system. The power difference
between the generation sources and the load demand is
calculated as
Pne t = PPV − Pload − Psc ………… (2)
where PPV is the power generated by the PV energy
conversion system, Pload is the load demand, and Psc is
the self-consumed power for operating the system. The
system self-consumed power is the power consumed by the
auxiliary system components to keep it running, for example,
the power needed for running the cooling systems, the control
units, and the gas compressor. For the purpose of
simplification, only the power consumed by the compressor
(Pcomp) is considered in this study.
The governing control strategy is that, at any given time, any excess wind and PV-generated power (Pne t > 0) is supplied to the electrolyzer to generate hydrogen that is delivered to the hydrogen storage tanks through a gas compressor. Therefore, the power balance equation given in (2) can be written as
PPV = Pload + Pelec + Pco m p , Pne t >0…………..(3)
Where Pelec is the power consumed by the electrolyzer to
generate H2 a n d Pcomp is the power consumed by the gas
compressor. When there is a deficit in power generation
(Pne t < 0), the FC stack begins to produce energy for the
load using hydrogen from the storage tanks. Therefore, the
power balance equation for this situation can be written as
PPV + PFC = Pload, Pne t < 0 …..(4)
Where PFC is the power generated by the FC stack.
Fig.6. Overall control strategy and power management
of the hybrid power generation system
Dynamic models have been used for all the components
of the system shown in Fig.6.
V. SIMULATION RESULTS
The simulation of grid connected PV-FC hybrid system is done
in MATLAB/Simulink toolboxs. The MATLAB/Simulink
model of proposed system is depicted in Fig. 7.
![Page 4: PV and FC IEEE Paper](https://reader038.vdocuments.mx/reader038/viewer/2022100500/54337834219acd5e1a8b489e/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Fig.7. Simulation model of proposed system
Using the component models discussed Section IV; a
simulation system test bed for the proposed PV/FC energy
system has been developed using MATLAB/Simulink. In
order to verify the system performance under different
situations, situation studies have been carried out using
practical load demand data.
The output power from the PV array in the system over
the 20 hour simulation is shown in Fig .8.
Fig.8. PV Power generated
Due to slow dynamic in FC system actuator, the FC
system cannot change its power to desired value as fast as
the load variation. In the proposed system, the dynamic
respond of fuel valve is simulated as first lead-lag transfer
function and this delay time is applied to the power
reference to keep the utilization factor of FC system at its
optimal value to improve FC system lifetime. The behavior
of the FC system in transient events such as step load
demand is shown in Fig.9 for a specified zoom.
Fig.9. FC stack system output power
VI. CONCLUSION
In this paper, an PV/FC alternative energy system is
proposed. The system configuration and unit-sizing are
discussed; the characteristics of the main components in the
system, namely, the PV, FC, and electrolyzer are given; and
the overall control and power management strategy for the
proposed hybrid energy system is presented. The PV
generation systems are the main power generation devices,
and the electrolyzer acts as a dump load using any excess
power available to produce H2 . The FC system is the
backup generation and supplies power to the system when
there is power deficit. The simulation model of the hybrid
system has been developed using MATLAB/Simulink.
Simulation studies have been carried out to verify the
system performance under different scenarios using the
practical load.
REFERENCES
[1] T. Bocklisch, W. Schufft, and S. Bocklisch, ―Predictive and optimizing
energy management of photovoltaic fuel cell hybrid systems with short time
energy storage,‖ in Proc. 4th Eur. Conf. PV-Hybrid and Mini- Grid, 2008, pp.
8–15.
[2] J. Larmine and A. Dicks, Fuel Cell Systems Explained. New York: Wiley,
2003
![Page 5: PV and FC IEEE Paper](https://reader038.vdocuments.mx/reader038/viewer/2022100500/54337834219acd5e1a8b489e/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
[3] W. Xiao, W. Dunford, and A. Capel, ―A novel modeling method for
photovoltaic cells,‖ in Proc. IEEE 35th Annu. Power Electronics Specialists
Conf., Jun. 2004, vol. 3, pp. 1950–1956.
[4] D. Sera, R. Teodorescu, and P. Rodriguez, ―PV panel model based on
datasheet values,‖ in Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Industrial Electronics, Jun. 4–7,
2007, pp. 2392–2396.
[5] C. Wang, M. H. Nehrir, and S. R. Shaw, ―Dynamic models and model
validation for PEM fuel cells using electrical circuits,‖ IEEE Trans. Energy
Convers., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 442–451, Jun. 2005.
[6] C. Hua and C. Shen, ―Comparative study of peak power tracking
techniques for solar storage system,‖ in Proc. 13th Annu. Applied Power
Electronics Conf. Expo., Feb. 1998, vol. 2, pp. 679–685.
[7] A. Hajizadeh and M. A. Golkar, ―Power flow control of grid-connected
fuel cell distributed generation systems,‖ J. Elect. Eng. Technol., vol. 3, no. 2,
pp. 143–151, 2008.
[8] C. Hua and J. R. Lin, ―DSP-based controller application in battery storage
of photovoltaic system,‖ in Proc.22nd IEEE Int. Conf. Industrial Electronics,
Control, and Instrumentation, Aug. 5–10, 1996, vol. 3, pp. 1750–1810.
[9] C. Hua, J. Lin, and C. Shen, ―Implementation of a DSP-controlled
photovoltaic system with peak power tracking,‖ IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron.,
vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 99–107, Feb. 1998.
[10] E. Koutroulism and K. Kaalitzakis, ―Development of a microcontroller-
based, photovoltaic maximum power point tracking control system,‖ IEEE
Trans. Power Electron., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 46–54, Jan. 2001.
[11] N. Mohan, T. M. Undeland, and W. P. Robbins, Power Electronics,
Converters, Applications and Design, 2nd ed. New York: Wiley, 2003.
[12] R. H. Lasseter, ―Microgrids,‖ in Proc. IEEE Power Eng. Soc. Winter
Meeting, Jan. 2002, vol. 1, pp. 305–308.
[13] R. H. Lasseter and P. Piagi, ―Control and design of microgrid
components,‖ Jan. 2006, PSERC final project reports.
[14] P. Piagi and R. H. Lasseter, ―Autonomous control of micro grids,‖
presented at the Power IEEE Eng. Soc. General Meeting, Montreal, QC,
Canada, 2006.
[15] F. Katiraei and M. R. Iravani, ―Power management strategies for a
microgrid with multiple distributed generation units,‖ IEEE Trans. Power
Syst., vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 1821 1831, Nov. 2006.