publishing research outcomes bruce gnade, ph.d. university of texas touradj solouki, ph.d. baylor...

Download Publishing Research Outcomes Bruce Gnade, Ph.D. University of Texas Touradj Solouki, Ph.D. Baylor University

If you can't read please download the document

Upload: clarissa-briggs

Post on 26-Dec-2015

214 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Slide 1
  • Publishing Research Outcomes Bruce Gnade, Ph.D. University of Texas Touradj Solouki, Ph.D. Baylor University
  • Slide 2
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft Importance of Publication The research backgrounds of the two investigators are fine. However, I don't see any previous study on the hydro seismic area. Generally, their publication records are weak.
  • Slide 3
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft Writing Successful Manuscripts Thinking ahead during research Selecting a journal Understanding the publication process Writing the manuscript Submitting the manuscript Responding to reviews Publication Avoiding common errors
  • Slide 4
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft Thinking Ahead During Research Where will I publish these results? How many papers will I publish with these data? To which journals will I submit these data? Who will be my co-authors? (Working in lab groups or in teams across disciplines and institutions distributes this workload efficiently)
  • Slide 5
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft Thinking Ahead During Research What information will I need to collect during research in order to produce a publication? methods field maps sample size background information
  • Slide 6
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft Patent Before Publishing www.dep.anl.gov/postdocs/resources/postdoc_presentations/elsie.pdf
  • Slide 7
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft Writing Successful Manuscripts Thinking ahead during research Selecting a journal Understanding the publication process Writing the manuscript Submitting the manuscript Responding to reviews Publication Avoiding common errors
  • Slide 8
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft High-Impact Journals
  • Slide 9
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft Choosing Subject Area
  • Slide 10
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft Ranked Results
  • Slide 11
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft Journal Impact Factor
  • Slide 12
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft Example of Calculation
  • Slide 13
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft Top Journals in Chemistry
  • Slide 14
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft Top Journals in Biology
  • Slide 15
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft Materials Research
  • Slide 16
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft Agricultural Sciences
  • Slide 17
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft Environmental Science
  • Slide 18
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft Selecting a Journal Read voraciously What types of articles does the journal publish? Methods papers Regional applications Fundamental advances Large data sets Mathematical modeling Review Article Analyze the journals habits
  • Slide 19
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft Selecting a Journal Read the editorial policy Example, Geochimca et Cosmochimica Acta
  • Slide 20
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft CSTE Editorial Description
  • Slide 21
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft Oncology Nursing Forum
  • Slide 22
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft Writing Successful Manuscripts Thinking ahead during research Selecting a journal Understanding the publication process Writing the manuscript Submitting the manuscript Responding to reviews Publication Avoiding common errors
  • Slide 23
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft Publication Process Actions taken on a paper submitted February 4, 2008
  • Slide 24
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft Publication Process Submission Acceptance of submission Reviews submitted Accepted for publication as written Accepted if revised Rejected Response to reviews Re-submission of edited manuscript
  • Slide 25
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft Writing Successful Manuscripts Thinking ahead during research Selecting a journal Understanding the publication process Writing the manuscript Submitting the manuscript Responding to reviews Publication Avoiding common errors
  • Slide 26
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft Ethics The words and figures and data must be original work Data can be re-used with proper citation Authors should make a substantive contribution to the paper Authors should be added or dropped with full disclosure Data must be fully and truthfully reported Errors must be fully and truthfully reported
  • Slide 27
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft Plagiarism Screening Source: iThenticate.com
  • Slide 28
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft Plagiarism Screening Source: iThenticate.com
  • Slide 29
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft Title and Authorship Who can be an author? Responsibilities of first author ownership submission and communications
  • Slide 30
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft Criteria for Authorship Authorship credit should be based on 1) substantial contributions to conception and design, acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data; 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content; and 3) final approval of the version to be published. Authors should meet conditions 1, 2, and 3. Source: www.icmje.org/ethical_1author.html
  • Slide 31
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft Abstract 264 Words What was measured What we learned Why its important
  • Slide 32
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft Abstract What was done? What were the specific results? What are the significant conclusion? Specific details General significance
  • Slide 33
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft Introduction
  • Slide 34
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft Introduction Cite the relevant general literature Narrow the focus to your topic Explain why your research is interesting State briefly what research was done
  • Slide 35
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft Introduction: Last Paragraph What samples collected What was measured Why? What results did we hope to achieve?
  • Slide 36
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft Background What does the reader need to understand about the previous results? What previous results will you refer to in your interpretations? If it doesnt help your reader or help your argument, eliminate it.
  • Slide 37
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft Methods Where were samples collected? What were the conditions under which they were taken? What were the analytical or experimental procedures? How were the analytical errors measured? How big were the errors?
  • Slide 38
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft Methods Cite the methods of other researchers wherever relevant
  • Slide 39
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft Results Data onlynot interpretations Show patterns Show sample locations Discuss errors Label axes
  • Slide 40
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft Label Clearly
  • Slide 41
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft Indicate Analytical Error
  • Slide 42
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft Tell A Story
  • Slide 43
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft Plan for Black and White Printing
  • Slide 44
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft Plan for Black and White Printing
  • Slide 45
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft Plan for Black and White Printing
  • Slide 46
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft Plan for Black and White Printing
  • Slide 47
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft Use High-resolution Graphics http://lilt.ilstu.edu/gmklass/pos138/datadisplay/badchart.htm
  • Slide 48
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft Effectively Illustrate Comparisons http://lilt.ilstu.edu/gmklass/pos138/datadisplay/badchart.htm
  • Slide 49
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft Minimize Ink to Data Ratio http://lilt.ilstu.edu/gmklass/pos138/datadisplay/badchart.htm High Ink:DataLow Ink:Data
  • Slide 50
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft Every Detail Matters One more issue bothers me. The authors show square piers in their figures. Almost all the experiments in the literature work with cylindrical piers, even the literature discussed in the proposal. In order to compare the results of this research with the bulk of previous research in this area of study, cylindrical piers should be used in the experiment and modeled in the simulation.
  • Slide 51
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft Format Tables Clearly
  • Slide 52
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft Format Tables Clearly
  • Slide 53
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft Organize to Clarify Data
  • Slide 54
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft Clarify Complex Relationships
  • Slide 55
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft Discussion Explain the results Refer to information in the background section Discuss alternative interpretations Discuss the limits of your interpretation Discuss additional work that would support or refute your interpretation Discuss the relevance to previous research
  • Slide 56
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft Conclusion Explain the broader significance Review the main conclusions Offer more speculative interpretations (cautiously) Point to the direction of future research
  • Slide 57
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft Acknowledgments Funding sources (include grant number) Reviewers (anonymous or by name) Colleagues who helped Laboratory technicians Family or friends (not usual, but sometimes done)
  • Slide 58
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft Acknowledgments
  • Slide 59
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft References Cited Follow the journals format List only references cited
  • Slide 60
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft Appendices (optional) Detailed methodology Data tables Algorithms Other useful detail not required in main text Check the journals guidelines May be electronic or printed
  • Slide 61
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft Figures and Captions Figures should be numbered in the order that they appear in the text Figure captions should only explain the figure content (all interpretations and discussion should be in the text) Figures will usually be reduced in size when printed Figures will usually be printed in grey tones unless you pay for color
  • Slide 62
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft Cite Other Data Sources
  • Slide 63
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft Writing Successful Manuscripts Thinking ahead during research Selecting a journal Understanding the publication process Writing the manuscript Submitting the manuscript Responding to reviews Publication Avoiding common errors
  • Slide 64
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft Format and File Types Read the journal guidelines carefully and early
  • Slide 65
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft Manuscript Formatting
  • Slide 66
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft Standard Manuscript Format
  • Slide 67
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft Published Journal Format
  • Slide 68
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft Letter to the Editor
  • Slide 69
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft Letter to the Editor
  • Slide 70
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft Letter: 1 st Paragraph
  • Slide 71
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft Letter: 2 nd Paragraph
  • Slide 72
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft Letter: Citations
  • Slide 73
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft Letter: Suggested Reviewers
  • Slide 74
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft Writing Successful Manuscripts Thinking ahead during research Selecting a journal Understanding the publication process Writing the manuscript Submitting the manuscript Responding to reviews Publication Avoiding common errors
  • Slide 75
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft Response to Review Comments
  • Slide 76
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft Response to Review Comment Respond to each comment Be respectful Respond fully Explain in detail
  • Slide 77
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft Writing Successful Manuscripts Thinking ahead during research Selecting a journal Understanding the publication process Writing the manuscript Submitting the manuscript Responding to reviews Publication Avoiding common errors
  • Slide 78
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft Publication Determine how many reprints that you want Communicate clearly with your co-authors Obtain and distribute PDF copies to co- authors Quickly respond to any last-minute requests by the editor
  • Slide 79
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft Writing Successful Manuscripts Thinking ahead during research Selecting a journal Understanding the publication process Writing the manuscript Submitting the manuscript Responding to reviews Publication Avoiding common errors
  • Slide 80
  • Peer-Reviewed Publications 2011 CRDF Global CRDF Draft Avoid Common Mistakes Read and follow all formatting guidelines Be sure the journal is suitable for the research Keep in good communications with co- authors Keep the paper clearly organized and place information in the correct location Be sure you know the existing research and cite it correctly