public act 94-004 and its effect on illinois’ teachers by marc ansay and jill kaner
TRANSCRIPT
Public Act 94-004 and its Effect on Illinois’ Teachers
By Marc Ansay and Jill Kaner
Teachers’ Retirement System (TRS)
Background Largest of the 5 public employee retirement
systems in Illinois General Assembly Retirement System (GARS), State Employees’ Retirement System of Illinois (SERS) State Universities Retirement System (SURS), Teachers’ Retirement System of the State of Illinois
(TRS) Judges Retirement System of Illinois (JRS)
Nearly 50%
TRS: The Facts
~ 350,000 public school teachers and administrators
Do not contribute to Social Security Average gross salary of participant(2007):
$56,916
Avg. monthly benefit $3,173
Avg. retirement age and length of service 69 and 29 years of service
TRS: The History
1950: Beginning of being underfunded at only 23%
1974: Contributions based on expected payout of benefits vs. cost of benefits being earned.
Bottom line: pension liability growing!
TRS: The History
1989: Public Act 86-0273 Fully funded system in 40 years. 7 year phase-in period. Increased funding, but also 3% interest on the
current annuity vs. 3% on original pension plan
Bottom line: pension still underfunded!
TRS: The History
1994: Public Act 88-593 Funds secured based on the actuarial cost of the state’s
unfunded liabilities vs. a set amount based on state budget.
Gradually raise the pension system funding ratio to 90 percent by the year 2045
2003: Public Act 90-0002 Issuance of $10 billion pension obligation bonds
Need for Reform
On June 30, 2005: TRS’ unfunded liability=$22 billion TRS’ funded ratio=61%
Illinois state constitution prevents state government from decreasing benefits membership in any of the state’s retirement systems “shall
be an enforceable contractual relationship, the benefits of which shall not be diminished or impaired”
Public Support for Reform
The state budget was strained by pension obligations
To gather support for pension reforms, the state government portrayed teacher pensions as “overly generous” Taxpayers were upset by end-of-career raises of up to
20%, which were included in pension calculations Instead of placing responsibility for the underfunded
pension liability on the state government, taxpayers viewed teachers as the culprits
Public Act 94-004
Public Act 94-004 undermines the 1994 attempt to decrease TRS’ unfunded pension liabilities The act provided for a fixed contribution to the fund in 2006
and 2007 The fixed contributions were less than 50% of the actuarial
estimates The act called for increased contributions between 2008
and 2010 to keep on track with the goal to be 90% funded by 2045 Unrealistic future contributions Loss of investment income (65% of TRS funding in 2005)
Public Act 94-004
The act also reduced pension benefits for Illinois’ current and future teachers Shifted responsibility away from the state
government and onto teachers and their districts The only teachers protected against the changes
were those who had declared their intent to retire prior to the act being passed
Public Act 94-004: Changes
Before the act: Teachers contributed 9% of their salaries to
retirement each year After the act:
Teachers are required to contribute an additional .4% of their salaries toward an early retirement option The additional money is returned to teachers if early
retirement option is not exercised
Public Act 94-004: Changes
Before the act: Teachers retiring with less than 34 years of TRS service
paid a one-time payment of 7% of their highest annual salaries for every year the teachers were below 60 years old
The teachers’ school districts paid a one-time payment of 20%
After the act: The teachers’ contributions increased to 11.5% if less than
35 years of service The school districts’ contributions rose to 23.5%
Public Act 94-004: Changes
Before the act: Teachers could include end-of-career raises of up
to 20% of their previous years’ salaries in pension calculations
After the act: School districts are now liable for any additional
pension costs resulting from salary increases of greater than 6%
Public Act 94-004: Changes
Before the act: Individual districts had discretion to grant sick
leave to teachers After the act:
If a district grants any teacher additional sick leave above the amount allotted to the district’s other teachers, the district is responsible for any pension costs arising from the additional sick leave awarded
Public Act 94-004: Changes
Before the act: School districts could limit the early retirement
option to 30% of teachers that were eligible to participate
After the act: School districts can limit participation to 10% of
eligible teachers
Immediate Impact
Teachers hit hardest by Public Act 94-004 were those close but not yet ready for retirement Will not receive expected end-of-career raises
May need to work longer to compensate for lower pension
May need to supplement pension with work during retirement
Impact on Teachers
The Bad Reduce the already low $38,000 annual benefit
less than $25,000 above the poverty level for family of two
No SS benefits Average annual income for teachers of $57,000
not enough to a high percentage for retirement
Can teachers have a comfortable retirement?
Impact on Education
Cutting pensions reduces the quality of education Teachers may leave Move to other states? Old laws still apply to teachers under current
contracts This leads to a DISINCENTIVE to continue work Pensions will only decrease New inexperienced teachers will be hired
Impact on Education
School spending will increase.1) Paying out earlier retirements under old law
2) To maintain a high quality on education, must hire experienced teachers at a high salary
Conversely, money for school programs and students will decrease.
Impact on Pension Fund
Long term effects still to be seen… And questions still remain
Can the state budget support the increased payments in 2008 to 2010?
Will the underfunded liability finally decrease? More problems?
Questions???