psychology of language heather ferguson. overview 1. definition of language 2. stages of language...
TRANSCRIPT
PSYCHOLOGY OF PSYCHOLOGY OF LANGUAGELANGUAGE
Heather FergusonHeather Ferguson
OVERVIEWOVERVIEW
1.1. Definition of languageDefinition of language
2.2. Stages of language perceptionStages of language perception
3.3. Stages of language productionStages of language production
4.4. Theories of language acquisitionTheories of language acquisition• Critical period hypothesisCritical period hypothesis• Case studyCase study
5.5. BilingualismBilingualism
WHAT IS LANGUAGE?WHAT IS LANGUAGE?
‘‘The systematic, conventional use of The systematic, conventional use of sounds, signs, or written symbols in a sounds, signs, or written symbols in a human society for communication and human society for communication and
self-expression.’ self-expression.’
David CrystalDavid Crystal
STAGES OF LANGUAGE STAGES OF LANGUAGE PERCEPTIONPERCEPTION
At birthAt birth Already prefer the sounds Already prefer the sounds
of their mother’s voiceof their mother’s voice Can discriminate between Can discriminate between
mother’s native language mother’s native language an other languagesan other languages
Discriminating soundsDiscriminating sounds
Adult speakers have difficulty Adult speakers have difficulty discriminating between language sounds discriminating between language sounds that are not phonemic contrasts in their that are not phonemic contrasts in their native languagenative language
Young infants do not demonstrate this Young infants do not demonstrate this difficulty initiallydifficulty initially They can discriminate any contrasting They can discriminate any contrasting
phonetic sounds in the world’s languagesphonetic sounds in the world’s languages
How can we possibly know that?How can we possibly know that?
Are /s/ and /ç/ different sounds for you, baby?
Testing InfantsTesting Infants
Some helpful things infants do for Some helpful things infants do for experimenters:experimenters: They look longer at new stimuli compared They look longer at new stimuli compared
to familiar stimulito familiar stimuli They suck faster when exposed to new They suck faster when exposed to new
stimulistimuli
Testing InfantsTesting Infants
Habituation-dishabituation methodHabituation-dishabituation method Habituate infant on one stimulusHabituate infant on one stimulus Show new, different stimulusShow new, different stimulus
Does the infant react to the new stimulus as new?Does the infant react to the new stimulus as new?
Habituation-dishabituation measuresHabituation-dishabituation measures Time looks to stimulusTime looks to stimulus High-amplitude sucking paradigmHigh-amplitude sucking paradigm
Does the infant start sucking faster on a pacifier Does the infant start sucking faster on a pacifier (that’s hooked up to a monitoring device)?(that’s hooked up to a monitoring device)?
Testing InfantsTesting Infants
ba ba ba ba ba ba
Testing InfantsTesting Infants
ba ba pa ba ba ba
Limited-time OfferLimited-time Offer
However, infants can only discriminate all However, infants can only discriminate all phonemes for a limited period of timephonemes for a limited period of time At 4 to 6 months phonetic sensitivity At 4 to 6 months phonetic sensitivity
diminishes. diminishes. By 12 months, infants are very poor at By 12 months, infants are very poor at
distinguishing foreign contrasts distinguishing foreign contrasts The (speech) perceptual system is being The (speech) perceptual system is being
reorganized around these time periods (4-reorganized around these time periods (4-6 months & 10-12 months)6 months & 10-12 months)
TheoryTheory Exposure and habituation to the sounds Exposure and habituation to the sounds
of the target language impedes an of the target language impedes an infant’s ability to perceive phonetic infant’s ability to perceive phonetic contrasts that the native language does contrasts that the native language does not makenot make
There are innate language abilities that There are innate language abilities that are lost due to experience with a first are lost due to experience with a first languagelanguage
One is born with all language sounds One is born with all language sounds available, but sound distinctions are lost available, but sound distinctions are lost as sound system developsas sound system develops
Phonemic Organization AccountPhonemic Organization Account
Loss of perceptual ability is related to Loss of perceptual ability is related to development of phonemic categories for development of phonemic categories for the first language- phonemic organizationthe first language- phonemic organization
Infant-directed SpeechInfant-directed Speech 7-week-old infants prefer infant-7-week-old infants prefer infant-
directed speech (‘motherese’) to directed speech (‘motherese’) to adult-directed speechadult-directed speech Regardless of gender of speakerRegardless of gender of speaker
Older infants show this Older infants show this preference as well, but younger preference as well, but younger infants are more responsive, both infants are more responsive, both in terms of attention and affectin terms of attention and affect
STAGES OF LANGUAGE STAGES OF LANGUAGE PRODUCTIONPRODUCTION
The larynxThe larynx At birth- the larynx is relatively high, and At birth- the larynx is relatively high, and
entire vocal tract is quite different from entire vocal tract is quite different from adultsadults
At 3 months- larynx begins to descend At 3 months- larynx begins to descend (won’t reach adult location until ~3 years (won’t reach adult location until ~3 years old)old)
At 4 months- the vocal tract begins to At 4 months- the vocal tract begins to resemble an adult vocal tractresemble an adult vocal tract
Infant Speech ProductionInfant Speech Production
Because of Because of their their maturing maturing vocal tract, vocal tract, some some sounds are sounds are genuinely genuinely difficult for difficult for young young children to children to produceproduce
Stage I (0-8 weeks): Basic Stage I (0-8 weeks): Basic biological noisesbiological noises
ReflexiveReflexive Hunger, pain and discomfort resulting in Hunger, pain and discomfort resulting in
cryingcrying VegetativeVegetative
Sucking, swallowing, coughing, burpingSucking, swallowing, coughing, burping Airstream mechanism and vocal folds Airstream mechanism and vocal folds
used to produce pitch patterns in a used to produce pitch patterns in a rhythmical fashionrhythmical fashion
Stage II (2-5 months): Cooing Stage II (2-5 months): Cooing and laughingand laughing
Cooing sounds develop alongside cryingCooing sounds develop alongside crying Quieter, lower-pitched and more musical Quieter, lower-pitched and more musical
than cryingthan crying Short-vowel-like sounds preceded by a Short-vowel-like sounds preceded by a
consonant-like sound produced at the consonant-like sound produced at the back of the mouthback of the mouth
No rhythm or intonational contourNo rhythm or intonational contour Laughing sounds emerge at around 4 Laughing sounds emerge at around 4
monthsmonths
Stage III (5-7Stage III (5-7½ months): Vocal ½ months): Vocal PlayPlay
High-pitched segments over one second High-pitched segments over one second long, frequently repeated (longer in long, frequently repeated (longer in duration than cooing)duration than cooing)
Wider intonation ranges (low to high)Wider intonation ranges (low to high) Large inventory of consonant and vowel Large inventory of consonant and vowel
sounds, with periodic focus on particular sounds, with periodic focus on particular places of articulationplaces of articulation
Stage IV (~6-12 months): Stage IV (~6-12 months): BabblingBabbling
Features of babbling:Features of babbling: Sounds are a subset of possible sounds found Sounds are a subset of possible sounds found
in spoken languagein spoken language Syllabic organisationSyllabic organisation Reduplication Reduplication
Same two sounds repeated (“babababa” Same two sounds repeated (“babababa” “papapapap”)“papapapap”)
Variegated babbling (~12 months)Variegated babbling (~12 months) Sounds change between syllables (“bamipabo”)Sounds change between syllables (“bamipabo”)
Stage IV (~6-12 months): Stage IV (~6-12 months): BabblingBabbling
Features of babbling:Features of babbling: Lack of meaning/ referenceLack of meaning/ reference Rhythm and intonation reminiscent of speechRhythm and intonation reminiscent of speech Continuity of phonetic form and syllable type Continuity of phonetic form and syllable type
between a child’s babbling and first wordsbetween a child’s babbling and first words Infants will often seem to ‘practise’ when aloneInfants will often seem to ‘practise’ when alone
Suggests that babbling is related more to Suggests that babbling is related more to practising speech sounds than communicationpractising speech sounds than communication
Babbling & Sign LanguageBabbling & Sign Language
Deaf infants also babbleDeaf infants also babble Often delayed (11-24 months) compared to Often delayed (11-24 months) compared to
hearing infantshearing infants Often different in character (e.g. fewer Often different in character (e.g. fewer
different kinds of consonants)different kinds of consonants) This indicates that exposure to a spoken language This indicates that exposure to a spoken language
influences babblinginfluences babbling
Infants (hearing and deaf) who are Infants (hearing and deaf) who are exposed to sign language will babble exposed to sign language will babble manuallymanually
Stage V (9-18months): Melodic Stage V (9-18months): Melodic UtteranceUtterance
Variations in melody, rhythm and Variations in melody, rhythm and intonation become a major feature toward intonation become a major feature toward the end of the first yearthe end of the first year
Begins to sound language-likeBegins to sound language-like
First WordsFirst Words
Around 12 monthsAround 12 months Focus on words related Focus on words related
to the here and now, to the here and now, concrete things:concrete things: People’s names, toys, People’s names, toys,
clothes, food they eatclothes, food they eat Words for things that Words for things that
they can influence (one-they can influence (one-word stage)word stage) ““ball” likely to be learned ball” likely to be learned
earlier than “chair” or earlier than “chair” or “tree”“tree”
First WordsFirst Words
Two kinds of errors children can make:Two kinds of errors children can make:1.1. Overextension- refer to all four legged Overextension- refer to all four legged
animals as dogsanimals as dogs
2.2. Underextension- refer to only the family dog Underextension- refer to only the family dog as dogas dog
The Mapping ProblemThe Mapping Problem
Child says “What’s that?” and points to:Child says “What’s that?” and points to:
So…how could this possibly go wrong?So…how could this possibly go wrong?
The Mapping ProblemThe Mapping Problem
Potential problems:Potential problems: More than one referent could apply to the More than one referent could apply to the
word, “teacup”word, “teacup”
The Mapping ProblemThe Mapping Problem
Potential problems:Potential problems: More than one word may apply to a referent:More than one word may apply to a referent:
Tea?Tea? Teacup?Teacup? Saucer?Saucer? A drink?A drink? Cup?Cup?
The Mapping ProblemThe Mapping Problem
Apparent solutions:Apparent solutions: Whole object bias- children prefer to attach Whole object bias- children prefer to attach
new labels to the whole objectnew labels to the whole object Mutual exclusivity bias- children prefer to Mutual exclusivity bias- children prefer to
have only one name for an objecthave only one name for an object
Early “Multiword” UtterancesEarly “Multiword” Utterances
By about 15months By about 15months babies have a babies have a vocabulary of about vocabulary of about 20- 25 words20- 25 words
Two yearsTwo years Vocabulary rapidly Vocabulary rapidly
increases to 100’s of increases to 100’s of wordswords
Child constructs Child constructs primitive sentences- primitive sentences- two-word stage (“no two-word stage (“no eat, throw ball”)eat, throw ball”)
Early “Multiword” UtterancesEarly “Multiword” Utterances Thirty monthsThirty months
Utterances progress Utterances progress beyond 2- word stage and beyond 2- word stage and show basic propositional show basic propositional structure (telegraphic structure (telegraphic stage)stage)
Functional words appear Functional words appear (“the, in, of”)(“the, in, of”)
Children overgeneralise Children overgeneralise rules (“goed”)rules (“goed”)
Five years oldFive years old Basic structure of language Basic structure of language
is in placeis in place Vocabulary of 10000- Vocabulary of 10000-
15000 words15000 words
THEORIES OF LANGUAGE THEORIES OF LANGUAGE ACQUISITIONACQUISITION
1.1. Nativist TheoriesNativist Theories• Language is entirely innateLanguage is entirely innate
2.2. Learning Theories Learning Theories • Language is entirely learnedLanguage is entirely learned
3.3. Cognitive TheoriesCognitive Theories• Language development is related Language development is related
to other cognitive developmentsto other cognitive developments4.4. Social Interactionist TheorySocial Interactionist Theory
• Language is acquired through Language is acquired through communicative interactioncommunicative interaction
NATIVISMNATIVISM
Emphasizes a child’s inborn capacities Emphasizes a child’s inborn capacities for languagefor language Language is acquired through a genetic Language is acquired through a genetic
programprogram Language acquisition is distinct from other Language acquisition is distinct from other
cognitive processescognitive processes
NATIVISMNATIVISM
Noam Chomsky- the language Noam Chomsky- the language acquisition device (LAD)acquisition device (LAD) Children are born with a basic Children are born with a basic
understanding of language and a mental understanding of language and a mental capacity to learn it quicklycapacity to learn it quickly
Brain is ‘over- connected’ at birth. Brain is ‘over- connected’ at birth. Connections that are not used die or Connections that are not used die or become dormant, and new connections become dormant, and new connections based on experience formbased on experience form
There is a specific time period of functionThere is a specific time period of function
NATIVISMNATIVISM
Universal grammar:Universal grammar: Children are pre-programmed with a kind of Children are pre-programmed with a kind of
default language which can be altered with default language which can be altered with exposure to a specific languageexposure to a specific language
Key assumption:Key assumption: Infants develops language even when other Infants develops language even when other
cognitive skills are lowcognitive skills are low
Evidence in Favour of a Pre-determined Evidence in Favour of a Pre-determined Biological Language System:Biological Language System:
1.1. Other primates don’t learn language simply Other primates don’t learn language simply by being treated like human infantsby being treated like human infants
Gua (chimp, 1993)Gua (chimp, 1993) Raised alongside a 9Raised alongside a 9½month-old boy for 9 months½month-old boy for 9 months Never spoke but learned to comprehend spoken Never spoke but learned to comprehend spoken
requestsrequests Viki (chimp, 1951)Viki (chimp, 1951)
Raised alone from 3 days- 7 years oldRaised alone from 3 days- 7 years old Capable of picture recognition, sorting of pictures Capable of picture recognition, sorting of pictures
and objects into conceptual categoriesand objects into conceptual categories Understood large number of words and phrasesUnderstood large number of words and phrases But, comprehension contextually determinedBut, comprehension contextually determined
Evidence in Favour of a Pre-determined Evidence in Favour of a Pre-determined Biological Language System:Biological Language System:
2.2. Children with other cognitive deficits still Children with other cognitive deficits still learn languagelearn language
Language skills can persist even in Language skills can persist even in cases of profound mental retardationcases of profound mental retardation
Evidence in Favour of a Pre-determined Evidence in Favour of a Pre-determined Biological Language System:Biological Language System:
3.3. Poverty of the stimulusPoverty of the stimulus Language input to children is ill-formed Language input to children is ill-formed
and incomplete (motherese)and incomplete (motherese) Children don’t receive explicit rules about Children don’t receive explicit rules about
what not to dowhat not to do They don’t get it even if you do tell themThey don’t get it even if you do tell them
Evidence in Favour of a Pre-determined Evidence in Favour of a Pre-determined Biological Language System:Biological Language System:
4.4. CreolesCreoles Pidgins develop in language contact situations Pidgins develop in language contact situations
(mostly colonial)(mostly colonial) (Pidgin = a language that has been constructed from two (Pidgin = a language that has been constructed from two
or more shared languages for communication between or more shared languages for communication between communities. A pidgin is not a mother tongue)communities. A pidgin is not a mother tongue)
Creoles develop from children exposed Creoles develop from children exposed primarily to pidginsprimarily to pidgins
(Creole = a language that has developed from a mixture (Creole = a language that has developed from a mixture of languages)of languages)
Children are, in essence, filling the gaps of Children are, in essence, filling the gaps of pidginspidgins
Evidence in Favour of a Pre-determined Evidence in Favour of a Pre-determined Biological Language System:Biological Language System:
5.5. Evidence for critical period of language Evidence for critical period of language acquisitionacquisition
THE CRITICAL PERIOD THE CRITICAL PERIOD HYPOTHESISHYPOTHESIS
Eric Lenneberg, 1967
THE CRITICAL PERIOD THE CRITICAL PERIOD HYPOTHESISHYPOTHESIS
Lenneberg theorized that… Lenneberg theorized that… The acquisition of language is an innate The acquisition of language is an innate
(you are born with it) process (you are born with it) process Biological factors limit the critical period for Biological factors limit the critical period for
acquisition of a language to a ‘window of acquisition of a language to a ‘window of opportunity’ from roughly two years of age opportunity’ from roughly two years of age to pubertyto puberty
If a child does not learn a language before If a child does not learn a language before the onset of puberty, the child will never the onset of puberty, the child will never master language at allmaster language at all
Bird Song and the Critical Bird Song and the Critical Period HypothesisPeriod Hypothesis
Some birds (like Sparrows) have courtship Some birds (like Sparrows) have courtship songssongs
Songs have dialectal variationSongs have dialectal variation Individual song is a version of other songs it Individual song is a version of other songs it
hears during the ‘critical period’ of first 100 hears during the ‘critical period’ of first 100 days of lifedays of life
Bird learns song by trial and error (babbling)Bird learns song by trial and error (babbling) When deprived of song input early in life, they When deprived of song input early in life, they
fail to produce a normal songfail to produce a normal song
THE CRITICAL PERIOD THE CRITICAL PERIOD HYPOTHESISHYPOTHESIS
The critical period and the human brain…The critical period and the human brain… Lenneberg believed that after lateralization (a Lenneberg believed that after lateralization (a
process by which the two sides of the brain process by which the two sides of the brain develop specialized functions), the brain loses develop specialized functions), the brain loses plasticityplasticity
Lenneberg claimed that lateralization of the Lenneberg claimed that lateralization of the language function is normally completed at language function is normally completed at puberty, making post-adolescent language puberty, making post-adolescent language acquisition difficultacquisition difficult
CASE STUDYCASE STUDY
The story of Genie
The Story of GenieThe Story of Genie
Read about Genie and decide for Read about Genie and decide for yourself…yourself… How does Genie’s language development How does Genie’s language development
relate to Lenneberg’s theory?relate to Lenneberg’s theory? What is the strongest evidence in support of What is the strongest evidence in support of
the Critical Period Hypothesisthe Critical Period Hypothesis Was Genie’s early language deprivation the Was Genie’s early language deprivation the
ONLY thing that contributed to her abnormal ONLY thing that contributed to her abnormal language development?language development?
The Story of GenieThe Story of Genie
Main points…Main points… From 20 months- 13 years old Genie was not From 20 months- 13 years old Genie was not
allowed to make noise and was not spoken to allowed to make noise and was not spoken to (father barked or growled at her)(father barked or growled at her)
When found could not speak or understand words When found could not speak or understand words (except name and ‘sorry’)(except name and ‘sorry’)
Over time, vocab increased and she learned to Over time, vocab increased and she learned to speak in 2/ 3- word sentencesspeak in 2/ 3- word sentences
BUT, speech has remained garbled and she has BUT, speech has remained garbled and she has never mastered grammar needed for languagenever mastered grammar needed for language
Genie and the Critical Period Genie and the Critical Period HypothesisHypothesis
At first, a number of researchers At first, a number of researchers thought that Genie would prove thought that Genie would prove Lenneberg’s theory wrong as…Lenneberg’s theory wrong as… 1 year after her escape she was producing 1 year after her escape she was producing
2/ 3- word sentences2/ 3- word sentences She could distinguish between singular/ She could distinguish between singular/
plural nouns and positive and negative plural nouns and positive and negative sentencessentences
Genie’s language resembled that of a Genie’s language resembled that of a normal 18- 20 month old childnormal 18- 20 month old child
Genie and the Critical Period Genie and the Critical Period HypothesisHypothesis
BUT, BUT, As time went on, Genie’s vocab did not As time went on, Genie’s vocab did not
‘explode’ as is the case with normally ‘explode’ as is the case with normally developing childrendeveloping children
Four years later…Four years later… She still had not mastered grammarShe still had not mastered grammar She could not ask questions properly She could not ask questions properly
(“where is may I have a penny”)(“where is may I have a penny”) She confused pronouns, using ‘you’ and She confused pronouns, using ‘you’ and
‘me’ interchangeably‘me’ interchangeably
Genie and the Critical Period Genie and the Critical Period HypothesisHypothesis
Has Genie supported Lenneberg’s Has Genie supported Lenneberg’s theory?theory? NO!NO!
Why?Why? Genie’s personal history was so disastrous Genie’s personal history was so disastrous
that it is not clear why she did not make that it is not clear why she did not make progress with her languageprogress with her language
It is possible that Genie did not master It is possible that Genie did not master language because she had passed the language because she had passed the ‘critical period’‘critical period’
BUT, other explanations are availableBUT, other explanations are available
Genie and the Critical Period Genie and the Critical Period HypothesisHypothesis
Genie’s brain may have been abnormalGenie’s brain may have been abnormal Brain scans showed that Genie’s brain was Brain scans showed that Genie’s brain was
unusualunusual As we know, for most people, the areas of the As we know, for most people, the areas of the
brain responsible for language functions are brain responsible for language functions are located in the left hemispherelocated in the left hemisphere
BUT, Genie’s brain was dominated by the BUT, Genie’s brain was dominated by the right hemisphereright hemisphere
Genie and the Critical Period Genie and the Critical Period HypothesisHypothesis
Conclusions…Conclusions… Genie’s lack of progress does suggest that, Genie’s lack of progress does suggest that,
over a certain age, any child who has not over a certain age, any child who has not learnt a language will have difficulty acquiring learnt a language will have difficulty acquiring oneone
BUT, other explanations can not be ruled outBUT, other explanations can not be ruled out Therefore, Lenneberg’s hypothesis is Therefore, Lenneberg’s hypothesis is not not
provenproven, but it is , but it is strongly supportedstrongly supported
LEARNING THEORIESLEARNING THEORIES
Associated with Skinner, Pavlov, etcAssociated with Skinner, Pavlov, etc Language is learned through basic Language is learned through basic
processes like associations, reinforcement processes like associations, reinforcement and imitationand imitation
Language acquisition occurs through three Language acquisition occurs through three processes:processes:
LEARNING THEORIESLEARNING THEORIES
1.1. Classical ConditioningClassical Conditioning
USUS URUR
USUS ++ CSCS CRCR
“ “bottle”bottle”
CSCS CRCR
“ “bottle”bottle”
LEARNING THEORIESLEARNING THEORIES
2.2. Operant ConditioningOperant Conditioning Reinforcement/ rewardsReinforcement/ rewards Children are rewarded for early attempts at Children are rewarded for early attempts at
languagelanguage Selective reinforcement shapes children’s Selective reinforcement shapes children’s
language as the requirement for a reward language as the requirement for a reward becomes more specificbecomes more specific
LEARNING THEORIESLEARNING THEORIES
3.3. Social learningSocial learning Observation and imitation of others, Observation and imitation of others,
especially those who are powerful, nurturing especially those who are powerful, nurturing and similar to the childand similar to the child
Limitations of Learning TheoriesLimitations of Learning Theories
BUT, these processes can not fully account BUT, these processes can not fully account for language development in children for language development in children because… because… Not enough to explain the complexities of Not enough to explain the complexities of
language itselflanguage itself Most parents do not consistently reinforce proper Most parents do not consistently reinforce proper
speechspeech Children say things they would not have heard an Children say things they would not have heard an
adult sayadult say Aspects of language development are universal Aspects of language development are universal
and do not vary with different experiencesand do not vary with different experiences
COGNITIVE THEORIESCOGNITIVE THEORIES Language is unique to humansLanguage is unique to humans
But, not a modular, pre-programmed abilityBut, not a modular, pre-programmed ability General disposition for learning that allows General disposition for learning that allows
languagelanguage Pattern recognitionPattern recognition ImitationImitation
Language development is related to other Language development is related to other forms of developmentforms of development
For these kinds of theories to be true infants For these kinds of theories to be true infants must have general skills that clearly contribute must have general skills that clearly contribute to languageto language
Cognition and LanguageCognition and Language Cognitive skills that are not language Cognitive skills that are not language
specific but none-the-less contribute to specific but none-the-less contribute to languagelanguage Newborns prefer face-like to non-face-like Newborns prefer face-like to non-face-like
stimulistimuli Quickly learn to recognize their mother’s Quickly learn to recognize their mother’s
faceface Young infants focus on the eye region more Young infants focus on the eye region more
than other facial regionsthan other facial regions More inclined to look at a pleasantly moving More inclined to look at a pleasantly moving
face than a still oneface than a still one
Cognition and LanguageCognition and Language
Infants know much more than they can Infants know much more than they can demonstrate physicallydemonstrate physically
So, infants come to the language So, infants come to the language environment with a much more environment with a much more sophisticated view of the world than has sophisticated view of the world than has been previously thoughtbeen previously thought LAD not necessarily needed!LAD not necessarily needed!
INTERACTIONIST VIEWINTERACTIONIST VIEW
Both inborn capacities and learning are Both inborn capacities and learning are importantimportant
Emphasizes the use of language and the fit Emphasizes the use of language and the fit between the child and the language environmentbetween the child and the language environment
Jerome Bruner- the language acquisition Jerome Bruner- the language acquisition support system (LASS)support system (LASS) Social context of language development is importantSocial context of language development is important Language- skilled adults structure and support the Language- skilled adults structure and support the
child’s language learning environmentchild’s language learning environment
INTERACTIONIST VIEWINTERACTIONIST VIEW
Parent- child language interaction Parent- child language interaction characterised by:characterised by: Infant- directed speech (‘motherese’)Infant- directed speech (‘motherese’)
High- pitched, simple, redundant speech adults use with High- pitched, simple, redundant speech adults use with babiesbabies
RecastingRecasting Rephrasing what child says, often as a questionRephrasing what child says, often as a question
EchoingEchoing Repeating what a child saysRepeating what a child says
ExpandingExpanding Restating in a more advanced way what a child saysRestating in a more advanced way what a child says
LabellingLabelling Naming objectsNaming objects
SUMMARY OF THEORIES OF SUMMARY OF THEORIES OF LANGUAGE ACQUSITIONLANGUAGE ACQUSITION
Language is clearly genetically specifiedLanguage is clearly genetically specified It appears that only humans develop a full It appears that only humans develop a full
version of itversion of it But not yet established to what extent But not yet established to what extent
language is directly specified and to what language is directly specified and to what extent its development is tied up with other extent its development is tied up with other aspects of cognitive and social aspects of cognitive and social developmentdevelopment
BILINGUALISMBILINGUALISM
Bilingualism and the Critical Period Bilingualism and the Critical Period HypothesisHypothesis
What is a bilingual? What is a bilingual? A person who uses or is able to use two A person who uses or is able to use two
languages, especially with equal fluencylanguages, especially with equal fluency Is there a cognitive advantage to bilingualism?Is there a cognitive advantage to bilingualism?
Early studies showing a disadvantageEarly studies showing a disadvantage– Studies of immigrantsStudies of immigrants– Confounded by social classConfounded by social class
Later studies showing an advantageLater studies showing an advantage– Avoided social class confoundsAvoided social class confounds– Picked up new confounds eg. ‘who is bilingual?”Picked up new confounds eg. ‘who is bilingual?”
Bilingualism and the Critical Period Bilingualism and the Critical Period HypothesisHypothesis
Evidence for…Evidence for… It is significantly harder for older adults to master a It is significantly harder for older adults to master a
second languagesecond language Evidence against…Evidence against…
Some late L2 learners can become ‘perfectly Some late L2 learners can become ‘perfectly fluent speakers’ (Long, 1990; Birdsong, 1992) fluent speakers’ (Long, 1990; Birdsong, 1992)
Brain and Bilingualism: IssuesBrain and Bilingualism: Issues
Are the separate languages of bilinguals Are the separate languages of bilinguals stored in separate parts of the brain?stored in separate parts of the brain?
Does neural representation vary with age Does neural representation vary with age of acquisition?of acquisition?
Is there a “language switch” somewhere in Is there a “language switch” somewhere in the brain?the brain?
Brain and BilingualismBrain and Bilingualism
Mixed evidence for differing brain regions Mixed evidence for differing brain regions in early and late bilinguals… in early and late bilinguals… Some studies have found similar patterns in Some studies have found similar patterns in
early and late bilinguals (Chee et al., 1999b) early and late bilinguals (Chee et al., 1999b)
Brain and BilingualismBrain and Bilingualism
But, some fMRI studies have found But, some fMRI studies have found different patterns of activation in sentence different patterns of activation in sentence production in early and late bilinguals (Kim production in early and late bilinguals (Kim et al., 1997)et al., 1997)
Bilingualism ConclusionsBilingualism Conclusions The two or more languages of bilinguals are distributed The two or more languages of bilinguals are distributed
across the same brain regions that are used by across the same brain regions that are used by monolinguals (Broca’s and Wernicke’s)monolinguals (Broca’s and Wernicke’s)
For both monolinguals and bilinguals, the regions For both monolinguals and bilinguals, the regions involved in language use vary by task, expertise and involved in language use vary by task, expertise and strategystrategy
The same areas may have to “work harder” and The same areas may have to “work harder” and additional areas may be recruited for processing in the additional areas may be recruited for processing in the weaker languageweaker language
Second language learning appears to be easier in the Second language learning appears to be easier in the critical period than later in life, BUT it is possible to critical period than later in life, BUT it is possible to become fluent in a second languagebecome fluent in a second language
Second language is not necessarily the weaker Second language is not necessarily the weaker language!language!
LANGUAGE REFERENCESLANGUAGE REFERENCES
Gleitman, H. 1999: Language in Gleitman, H. 1999: Language in PsychologyPsychology. Chapter 9, pp 344- 399. Chapter 9, pp 344- 399
www.feralchildren.comwww.feralchildren.com Bee, H. Bee, H. The developing ChildThe developing Child