prp update: from basic science to clinical application
TRANSCRIPT
PRP UpdateFrom basic science to
clinical applicationJohn J. Klimkiewicz, MD
Washington Orthopedics and Sports MedicineHead Team Physician
Washington Capitals Hockey Club & Georgetown University Hoyas
PRP: Platelet Rich Plasma• Definition: sample of blood
platelet concentration above baseline produced by centrifugal separation of whole blood• Provides increased
concentration of autologous growth factors and secretory proteins that may enhance the healing process on a cellular level
PRP History• Utilized and studied since 1970’s• Over 86,000 injections performed in orthopedics in
2013• Market PRP : $45 million in 2009, expected to be
$125 million in 2016• Clinical applications:
• Oral surgery• Plastic surgery• Vascular Surgery• Hair transplantation
• Orthopedic Applications• Muscle/Tendon injury
• Acute vs chronic• Ligamentous injury• Cartilage injury• Osteoarthritis
Composition of PRP• PRP obtained by commercially
available systems that separate blood components by centrifugation• Plasma-fluid portion of blood
containing clotting factor, proteins, ions• Platelet: Normal concentration in
blood 150,000/ul – 300,000 /ul• PRP: platelet concentration of at least
1,000,000 ul• Leukocytes : WBC’s• Erythrocytes: RBC’s
Regulation• World Anti-doping agency temporarily
banned PRP injections in 2009-2011.• Currently not a banned substance,
individual growth factors however still banned
• No Regulation by NCAA, NHL, NBA,NFL• FDA approved for use with Bone graft
substitutes, office use is “off label”• Currently not covered under insurance
for orthopedic application
Platelets importance: Multiple Applications• a – granules in platelets contain
various growth factors and cytokines with concentrations equal to platelets• Increase anabolic cytokine activity
• Transforming growth factor: TGF-B• Platelet Derived Growth factor: PDGF• Insulin like growth factor : IGF-1, IGFII• Fibroblast growth factor: FGF• Vascular epithelial growth factor:
VEGF• Endothelial growth factor
Leukocytes• Different preparations have different
concentrations of Leukocytes that dictate function
• Defined as either Leukocyte rich or Leukocyte poor as compared to whole blood
• Increased concentration of leukocytes correlates with platelet concentration
• Leukocyte rich preparations have increased amounts of IL-1 and TNF –a (inflammatory cytokines-catabolic)
• Have increased amounts of VEGF (anabolic)
Multiple system preparations• Multiple commercial systems
available. Over 80 on market.• Each system differs in time
centrifuged as well as number of cycles• Differ in platelet, wbc , and growth
factor concentration• Oh , AJSM, 2013
• Be careful in comparing studies• All PRP not similar• Different preps may be better for
different conditions
Optimal PRP performance• Platelet number: “more not
necessarily better”• 1.5 million/ul may be optimal• Above this may have catabolic
effect
• Timing: During or after inflammatory phase of healing may be optimal
PRP Effects on Tendon Tissue• Increase in PDGF an TGF –B to
area essential to healing• Increase in VEGF: increases
vascularity at injured site• Both act to enhance tenocyte
proliferation at injured site• Results in Vitro:
• Earlier healing• Superior quality to healed tendon• Better organization of fibroblasts and
collagen
PRP Effects on Muscle• IGF-1 and FGF -2 have should
beneficial effects in muscle healing• In murine model IGF-1 ,b FGF
cytokines improved healing and significant fast twitch and tetanus strength• TGF-B can cause detrimental
increase in fibrosis and lead to recurrent injury• Anecdotal reports report decrease
in time to return to play
PRP Effects on cartilage• Increases synthetic capacity of
chondrocytes• Increases gene expression
through upregulation• Increases proteoglycan
production• Increases deposition of type II
collagen• Inhibits catabolic effect of IL-B,
TNF-a on chondrocytes
Systemic Effects of PRP• Serum IGF, VEGF, an BFGF levels
are significantly elevated after PRP injection• Activates biologic pathways that
increase growth factor levels• VEGF levels are elevated up to 4
days after injection and can serve as a testing marker
• Wasteriain et al. AJSM, 2013
PRP and Lateral EpicondylitisStudy # Participants Control Effectiveness Follow-up
Krogh AJSM-2013JBJS 2014
60 Control, GLU EQUAL 3 months
MishraAJSM-2014
230 control 3 months equalPRP-R superior at 6 months
3 and 6 months 84% vs 63% for control
Gosens AJSM-2011
100 GLU PRP: Better DASH and VAS scores
2 year
JoostAJMS
100 GLU PRP: Better DAS scores
1 year
PRP and Lateral epicondylitis: Meta-AnalysisKrogh , AJSM, 2013
• 17 trials, 1381 participants• 8 different treatments: PRP, GLU, Bo
Tox, autologous blood, HA, prolotherapy, GAG• 3/17 trails unbiased• Conclusion: Paucity of evidence
from unbiased trials to support treatment recommendation• Trend towards PRP being effective,
not statistically signif., not cost effective
PRP and Rotator cuff repairstudy Number
participantsControl Follow up Results
FluryAJSM 2016
120 Prp vs ropivicaine 24 months Equal
MalavoltaAJSM 2014
54 control 24 months Equal
Weber AJSM 2013
60 control 12 months Equal
WangAJSM2015
60 control 4 months No difference in function or MRI
PRP and Patellar tendonitis
Study Number of participants
control Follow up Results
DragooAJSM 2014
23 Dry needlingVs PRP-leuko rich
12 and 26 weeks VISAS: better at 12 weeks, equal at 26 weeks
CharoussetAJSM 2012
28 None—3 injections one week apart
3 months 3 months: 21/28 back to sport
AlmeidaAJSM
27 Placebo: at harvest site after acl
6 month Improved post-op pain and better healing mri at 6 months
MRI: Patella Tendonitis and PRP
Pre-PRP injection 6 months s/p PRP injection
PRP and Muscular Injuries: Clinical Trial• 28 pts with acute hamstring
injuries• Randomized into PRP + rehab, vs
rehab alone• Lower pain level in PRP group
• Hamid et al, AJSM, 2014
PRP + rehab Rehab0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Treatment
DAYS
to re
turn
PRP and Achilles Tendonitisstudy Number
participantscontrol Follow up Result
KroghAJSM 2016
24 Prp vs saline 3 months No change in sxPositive in tendon thickness
DeJongeAJSM 2011
70 PRP vs saline and exercises
1 year EQUAL
DeVOSJAMA, 2010
24 PRP vs saline 1 year EQUAL
PRP and arthritis• Effects seem to increase
endogenous HA production, and decrease cartilage catabolism• IL-1 B and MMP activity
decreased with PRP• Leukocyte poor PRP more
effective than Leukocyte rich preparations
Treatment using PRP: Consensus Agreement• No anti-inflammatories 1-2
weeks before and after injection, “Washout period”• No local anesthetic to injection
site—Alters pH which may alter function• Ultrasound use preferred for
tendons and Muscular injections
PRP Treatment : Requires more study• Optimal conditions• Optimal concentration of Platelets
and fractionated WBC’s• Number and sequence of injections• Post injection rehab routines• Evidence still lacking to prove
definite benefit• Appears safe when used judiciously• Cost –Benefit analysis lacking
Efficacy of autologous Platelet Rich Plasma use for Orthopaedic Indications: A Meta-analysis• 33 studies that were randomized
controlled or prospective cohort studies that compared prp with control for orthopaedic injury• Conclusion: The current literature is
complicated by a lack of standardization of study protocols, platelet separation techniques, and outcome measures. As a result, there is an uncertainty to support the increasing use of prp as a treatment modality for orthopedic injuries Sheth et al., 2012
THANK YOU!!