proximal humerus fractures in the...

9
24 Bulletin • Hospital for Joint Diseases Volume 62, Numbers 1 & 2 2004 Abstract Proximal humerus fractures in the elderly are a relatively rare injury, the treatment of which remains controversial, especially regarding Neer displaced two-part, and three- part and four-part fractures. Operative indications for most displaced proximal humerus fractures in the elderly remain poorly defined, but recent literature is actually supporting less aggressive approaches except for the most severe frac- tures. Recent epidemiological and larger scale retrospec- tive studies fail to show a significant functional difference between operative and non-operative treatment of displaced two-part and three-part fractures in the elderly. Most four- part fractures appear to be best treated with hemiarthro- plasty. Recent meta-analyses show a need for well-executed, randomized, prospective studies that can be used to provide evidence-based templates for appropriate management of displaced proximal humerus fractures in the elderly. P roximal humerus fractures in the elderly are a rela- tively rare injury, and appropriate treatment, espe- cially of displaced fractures, remains controversial. The incidence of proximal humerus fractures is 4% to 5% of all fractures. 1 There is a unimodal distribution, with this fracture occurring in people over 70 years of age. However, unlike many osteoporotic fractures, proximal humerus frac- tures tend to occur in the fit elderly. Eighty-seven percent of these injuries are due to ground level falls and are nearly three times more common in women than men. 2,3 Minimally or nondisplaced fractures comprise 85% of these injuries, 2,3 and non-operative treatment is generally the treatment of choice. 4 There is no consensus in the literature regarding the optimum treatment of the remaining 15% of proximal humerus fractures. There are many treatment options, rang- ing from closed treatment 5-7 to prosthetic replacement, 3 yet the indications for operative management and the best surgical options are not well-delineated. In addition, recent meta-analyses and larger retrospective and prospective series have not shown a clear advantage to operative versus non- operative management for many types of proximal humerus fractures, including many displaced fractures. 5-10 Anatomy The key to classifying and treating proximal humerus frac- tures is understanding proximal humerus anatomy. Neer 3 described four well-defined parts of the proximal humerus: the greater tuberosity, the lesser tuberosity, the proximal shaft, and the humeral head. The Neer classification of proximal humerus fractures is based on displacement and angulation of these four parts. The significance of these parts lies in the deforming forces that act on them once they are fractured. These forces act as follows: 1. the rota- tor cuff causes proximal and posterior displacement of the greater tuberosity and medial displacement of the lesser tuberosity and humeral head through the subscapularis; 2. the pectoralis major causes medial displacement of the humeral shaft; and 3. the deltoid causes abduction of the humeral shaft (Fig. 1). 4 Although the vascular supply does not play a role in Neer’s classification scheme, it is important to understand, as it may help dictate appropriate management by helping to predict the post-fracture vascularity of the humeral head. There are three main contributions to the vascular supply of the humeral head. The arcuate artery, an interosseous vessel that is the terminal branch of the anterior humeral circumflex, is the main arterial contribution to the humeral Proximal Humerus Fractures in the Elderly Are We Operating on Too Many? Toni M. McLaurin, M.D. Toni M. McLaurin, M.D., is an Assistant Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery in the NYU-HJD Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York, New York. Correspondence: Toni M. McLaurin, M.D., NYU Medical Cen- ter, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, 550 FirstAvenue, NBV 21W37, New York, New York 10016.

Upload: lamnguyet

Post on 19-Feb-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Proximal Humerus Fractures in the Elderlypresentationgrafix.com/_dev/cake/files/archive/pdfs/631.pdf · Proximal humerus fractures in the elderly are a relatively rare injury,

24 Bulletin• Hospital for Joint Diseases Volume62,Numbers1&2 2004

Abstract

Proximal humerus fractures in the elderly are a relatively rare injury, the treatment of which remains controversial, especially regarding Neer displaced two-part, and three-part and four-part fractures. Operative indications for most displaced proximal humerus fractures in the elderly remain poorly defined, but recent literature is actually supporting less aggressive approaches except for the most severe frac-tures. Recent epidemiological and larger scale retrospec-tive studies fail to show a significant functional difference between operative and non-operative treatment of displaced two-part and three-part fractures in the elderly. Most four-part fractures appear to be best treated with hemiarthro-plasty. Recent meta-analyses show a need for well-executed, randomized, prospective studies that can be used to provide evidence-based templates for appropriate management of displaced proximal humerus fractures in the elderly.

Proximalhumerusfracturesintheelderlyarearela-tively rare injury, and appropriate treatment, espe-ciallyofdisplacedfractures,remainscontroversial.

Theincidenceofproximalhumerusfracturesis4%to5%ofallfractures.1Thereisaunimodaldistribution,withthisfractureoccurringinpeopleover70yearsofage.However,unlikemanyosteoporoticfractures,proximalhumerusfrac-turestendtooccurinthefitelderly.Eighty-sevenpercentoftheseinjuriesareduetogroundlevelfallsandarenearlythreetimesmorecommoninwomenthanmen.2,3Minimallyornondisplacedfracturescomprise85%oftheseinjuries,2,3

andnon-operative treatment isgenerally the treatmentofchoice.4There isnoconsensus in the literatureregardingtheoptimumtreatmentoftheremaining15%ofproximalhumerusfractures.Therearemanytreatmentoptions,rang-ing from closed treatment5-7 to prosthetic replacement,3yettheindicationsforoperativemanagementandthebestsurgicaloptionsarenotwell-delineated.Inaddition,recentmeta-analysesandlargerretrospectiveandprospectiveserieshavenotshownaclearadvantagetooperativeversusnon-operativemanagementformanytypesofproximalhumerusfractures,includingmanydisplacedfractures.5-10

AnatomyThekeytoclassifyingandtreatingproximalhumerusfrac-turesisunderstandingproximalhumerusanatomy.Neer3describedfourwell-definedpartsoftheproximalhumerus:thegreatertuberosity,thelessertuberosity,theproximalshaft, and the humeral head.The Neer classification ofproximalhumerusfracturesisbasedondisplacementandangulationof thesefourparts.Thesignificanceof theseparts lies in thedeformingforces thatacton themoncetheyarefractured.Theseforcesactasfollows:1.therota-torcuffcausesproximalandposteriordisplacementofthegreater tuberosityandmedialdisplacementofthelessertuberosity and humeral head through the subscapularis;2.thepectoralismajorcausesmedialdisplacementofthehumeralshaft;and3.thedeltoidcausesabductionofthehumeralshaft(Fig.1).4

Although thevascular supplydoesnotplaya role inNeer’sclassificationscheme,itisimportanttounderstand,asitmayhelpdictateappropriatemanagementbyhelpingtopredictthepost-fracturevascularityofthehumeralhead.Therearethreemaincontributionstothevascularsupplyofthehumeralhead.Thearcuateartery,aninterosseousvesselthatistheterminalbranchoftheanteriorhumeralcircumflex,isthemainarterialcontributiontothehumeral

Proximal Humerus Fractures in the ElderlyAre We Operating on Too Many?

Toni M. McLaurin, M.D.

ToniM.McLaurin,M.D.,isanAssistantProfessorofOrthopaedicSurgery in the NYU-HJD Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,NewYork,NewYork.Correspondence: ToniM.McLaurin,M.D.,NYUMedicalCen-ter,DepartmentofOrthopaedicSurgery,550FirstAvenue,NBV21W37,NewYork,NewYork10016.

Page 2: Proximal Humerus Fractures in the Elderlypresentationgrafix.com/_dev/cake/files/archive/pdfs/631.pdf · Proximal humerus fractures in the elderly are a relatively rare injury,

25 Bulletin• Hospital for Joint Diseases Volume62,Numbers1&2 2004

headandperfusestheentireepiphysis.Damagetothisves-selrequiresamoredistalanastomosistocompensateforthelackofbloodsupply.Abranchoftheposteriorhumeralcircumflexsuppliesasmallportionoftheposteroinferiorpart of the articular surface, and small vessels enteringthroughtherotatorcuffinsertionsalsosupplyinconsistentvascularitytothehumeralhead(Fig.2).Bothofthesesup-plyvascularity toamuchlesserdegree thanthearcuateartery.4

ClassificationAstheNeerclassificationisbasedonthesefouranatomicalparts, it is important toobtainadequateandappropriateradiographstodeterminethepresenceoffracturelines,dis-placement,andangulation.Thestandardshoulder“traumaseries”consistsofanAPoftheshoulder,ascapularYview,and an axillary view (Fig. 3).Additional studies, suchasinternalandexternalrotationviewsandtransthoraciclateralviews,canaddmoreinformationwhentheclassi-ficationisequivocal.AccordingtotheNeerclassification,displacementgreaterthanonecentimeterorangulationofmorethan45°isrequiredforclassificationasapart.Al-thoughthisclassificationhasbeenshowntohavesignificantproblemswithintra-observerandinter-observervariabilityand reproducibility,11,12 it remains the most widely-usedclassificationofproximalhumerusfractures. TheAOclassification13,14(Fig.4)emphasizesthevas-cularsupplytothearticularsegment.Thisclassificationisgenerallyonlyusedforreportingpurposesintheliterature,but may have more significance in identifying specificfracturepatterns.AOTypeAfracturesareunifocal,usually

involvingthegreatertuberosityorsurgicalneckandhavenovascularinterruptiontothearticularsegment.TypeBfracturesarebifocal,includesomefracture-dislocations,andhaveanincreasedriskofavascularnecrosis.TypeCfracturesincludeallintra-articularanatomicalneckfrac-tures, includinghead-splitting fractures.These fracturesinvolvetotalvasculardissociationofthearticularsegmentandhaveahighriskofavascularnecrosis.Therearead-ditionalsubdivisionstofurtherdescribethefractures,butduetoboththeclassification’scomplexityandthefactthatithasnotyetbeen shown tobepredictiveof long-termoutcomes,itsuseremainsuncommon.

Current Treatment RecommendationsThecontroversyregardingappropriatetreatmentofproxi-malhumerusfracturesincreasesasthecomplexityofthefractureincreases.Non-displacedorminimallydisplacedfracturesarereportedtocompriseanywherefrom49%to85%ofallproximalhumerusfractures.2-4Clearly,intheelderly,non-operativemanagementoftheseinjuriesistherecommendedtreatment.Thecontroversybeginswhendis-placedfracturesareconsidered.Currenttrendsinorthopae-dicshavefavoredoperativemanagementofdisplacedtwo-,three-,andfour-partfractures.Recommendationsformostdisplaced two- and three-part fractures include internalfixation,withpossibleprostheticreplacementinthree-partfracturesthatarenotamenabletoreconstruction.15-18Theseincludefracturesthatareseverelycomminutedorthatoccurinveryosteopenicbone.Intheelderly,four-partfracturesaregenerallybesttreatedwithhemiarthroplasty,withtheexceptionofthevalgusimpactedfour-partfracture.19,20This

Figure 1Deformingforcesontheproximalhumerus.Directionofarrowsshowsdirectionofdeformitycausedbyeachmuscle.

Figure 2Bloodsupplyoftheproximalhumerus.

Page 3: Proximal Humerus Fractures in the Elderlypresentationgrafix.com/_dev/cake/files/archive/pdfs/631.pdf · Proximal humerus fractures in the elderly are a relatively rare injury,

26 Bulletin• Hospital for Joint Diseases Volume62,Numbers1&2 2004

particular fracture pattern has a significantly lower rateofavascularnecrosisthanotherfour-partfractures(20%versusupto90%)andanattemptatlimitedinternalfixation

isrecommended.19Ifadequatefixationisnotpossible,thentreatmentwithhemiarthroplastyshouldproceed. Many different types of internal fixation have been

Figure 3Radiographicshoulder“traumaseries”including:APoftheshoulder(AandB notethelackofoverlapofthehumeralheadontheglenoidascomparedtotheshoulderviewseenonanAPchestx-ray);C, scapularYview;andD, axillaryview.

C

D

BA

Page 4: Proximal Humerus Fractures in the Elderlypresentationgrafix.com/_dev/cake/files/archive/pdfs/631.pdf · Proximal humerus fractures in the elderly are a relatively rare injury,

27 Bulletin• Hospital for Joint Diseases Volume62,Numbers1&2 2004

described,andpapersaredispersedthroughoutthelitera-turebothsupportingandcondemningalmosteverytypeoffixation.Discussingtheindicationsandcontraindicationsofthemallisbeyondthescopeofthisreview,butfollowingaremanyofthesefixationoptions:tensionbandwiring16,21;modifiedtensionbandwiringwithEndersrods22;closedreductionandpercutaneouspinning23;intramedullarynail-ing24;andopenreductioninternalfixationwithavarietyofplate-and-screwconstructs,includingstandardT-plates,18,25bladeplates,17and thenewer lockingproximalhumerusplates. Complications of proximal humerus fractures canderivefromboththefractureitselfandfromitstreatment.One of the most devastating of these complications isavascularnecrosis(AVN).ThehighestrateofAVNoccurswithfour-partfractures,and,aspreviouslystated,maybe

ashighas90%.Itcanalsooccurinthree-partfractures,butsinceonlyaportionoftheheadisinvolved,theAVNmaynotbeasclinically significant.However,operativetreatment can exacerbate this, as increased stripping offracturefragmentsduringopenreductioncanincreasetheproportionoftheheadthatisaffectedbyAVN.17,26Othercomplicationsare related to the fact thatanyattemptatinternalfixationinvolvesattemptingtogetadequatebonypurchaseinosteopenicbone.Thesecomplicationsincludemultipletypesofhardwarefailuresuchasscrewcutout,failureofplatefixation,andbackingoutofintramedullarynails,anyofwhichcanresult inbonycollapseand lossofreduction(Fig.5).Aswithall fractures, there isalsoalwaystheriskofmalunion,nonunion,neurologicinjury,and vascular injury, all possible either with or withoutoperativeintervention.

Figure 4AOclassificationofproximalhumerusfractures.

Page 5: Proximal Humerus Fractures in the Elderlypresentationgrafix.com/_dev/cake/files/archive/pdfs/631.pdf · Proximal humerus fractures in the elderly are a relatively rare injury,

28 Bulletin• Hospital for Joint Diseases Volume62,Numbers1&2 2004

Are We Operating on Too Many Proximal Humerus Fractures in the Elderly?Astheliteratureoverthepasttwodecadeshastendedtosupport,operativemanagementofdisplacedtwo-part,andmost three-,and four-part fractures,even in theelderly,it is important to critically review the literature regard-ing these injuries.A review of the literature to try todeterminethenaturalhistoryofnon-operativetreatmentof proximal humerus fractures reveals that many of therepeatedlyquotedstudiesaredecadesoldwithmultipleflawsandmanyotheraspectsthatmakedistillingthemallintoasinglerecommendationinappropriate.Thesestud-iesfrequentlyhavedifferentrehabilitationprotocolsnotonly in a study-to-study comparison, but oftenbetweenpatientsgroupswithinthesamestudy.Mostofthestudiesarenonrandomized,retrospective,comparative,andbasedonsmallserieswithnocontrols.9,10Manyhaveinclusion

criteria thatallowtheresultsofnon-operative treatmentoflow-energyfracturesinelderlypatientstobecombinedwith those of young patients with high-energy injuries.Widelyvaryinginjurytypesareoftencombined.Mostim-portantly,inthiseraofevidence-basedmedicine,inmanyofthesestudies,whenoutcomeswereactuallyevaluated,avarietyofoutcomemeasureswereused,butmostofthemwerenotvalidated.9

Asystematicreviewoftheliteratureontreatmentofthree-andfour-partproximalhumerusfracturesbyMisraandcolleagues10lookedat147comparativetrialsandcaseseriesoverthe30-yearperiodfrom1969to1999.Inclusioncriteriaforreviewincludedstudiesevaluatingthree-andfour-part fractures in skeletally mature patients, with aminimum of 15 patients enrolled in each study, treatedwithin48hoursof injury,withaminimumof6monthsoffollowupandat least85%patientfollowup.Ofthese

Figure 5This65-year-oldpatienthadanopenproximalhumerusfracture-dislocation(A)andunderwentirrigationdebridementandoperativefixationinitiallywithmodifiedtensionbandwiring(B).Thisfixationfailed(C,APveiw)andwasrevisedtoabladeplate(D),whichalsofailed(E).Thepatientdevelopedapost-operativeinfectionrequiringnumerousrepeatdebridements,buteventuallywentontohealwithantibioticbeadsbutnohardwareinplace(F).

A B C

D E F

Page 6: Proximal Humerus Fractures in the Elderlypresentationgrafix.com/_dev/cake/files/archive/pdfs/631.pdf · Proximal humerus fractures in the elderly are a relatively rare injury,

29 Bulletin• Hospital for Joint Diseases Volume62,Numbers1&2 2004

147studies,only24wereeligiblefortheauthors’review.Twenty-onewerecaseseries,threewerecomparativetri-als,andonlytwowererandomized,controlledtrials.Theauthorslookedatnumerousfactorstoattempttoderiveanyconclusionsfromtheirmeta-analysis.Theonlyconclusionstheywereabletodrawwere:1.conservativemanagementcomparedtoeitherfixationorarthroplastyresultedinmorepainandpoorerrangeofmotion,althoughthedifferenceinrangeofmotionwhencomparingconservativemanage-menttofixationwasnotsignificant;and,interestingly,2.restorationof anatomywasnot shown to correlatewithbetter functionaloutcome.These investigatorswereun-abletoreachanyotherconclusionsbasedontheliterature,despitethelargenumberofstudiestheyreviewed. TheCochranedatabaseofsystematicreviews,acol-lection of evidence-based medicine databases, containsa reviewof interventions forproximalhumerus fracturesoriginally performed in 2001, and updated in 2002 and2003.9,27,28Evenwithupdates,only12randomizedstudiesonproximalhumerusfractureswerefoundintheliterature.Allweresmall,withthelargestinvolvingonly86patients.Eight evaluated conservative treatment, three comparedconservative treatment with surgery, and one comparedtwosurgicaltechniques.OneofthemajorconclusionsfromboththisreviewandthatofMisraandcolleagues10isthatnoevidence-baseddecisionsregardingappropriatetreatmentofproximalhumerusfracturescanbemadebasedonthecurrentliterature. Inoneofthefewrandomized,prospectivestudiesintheliterature,Zytoandassociateslookedatthree-andfour-partfracturesin40patientswithameanageof74years,comparingtensionbandwiringtoconservativetreatment.21UsingtheConstantscore,29pain,rangeofmotion,power,andactivitiesofdailylivingwereassessed.Theseinvestiga-torsfoundnosignificantdifferenceinfunctionafter1yearbetween theoperativeandnon-operativegroups,withnostatisticallysignificantdifferencesinpain,rangeofmotion,abduction/flexionpower,orabilitytoperformactivitiesofdaily living. In both groups, little improvement in theseoutcomeswasseenafter1year.Surgerydidimprovethepositionofthefracturefragments,butthisdidnotcorrelatewithanyimprovementinfunctionaloutcomecomparedtothe non-operative patients, plus surgery resulted in morecomplications.Theseinvestigatorsconcludedthat,asout-comeswere similarbutoperative treatmenthad ahighercomplication rate, conservative treatment should be con-sideredfordisplacedthree-partfractures.Sinceonlythreepatientsinthestudyhadfour-partfractures,theauthorsfelttheir sample sizewas too small todrawanyconclusionsaboutthisfracturetype.However,theydidnotethatofthetwopatients treatednon-operatively,bothhadacceptablefunctionaloutcomes. Ilchmann and coworkers7 performed a retrospectivereviewof34patients,withameanageof70years,inwhomthree-andfour-partfracturesweretreatedeithernon-opera-

tivelyorwithtension-bandwiring.Inthree-partfractures,theyfoundbetterpainreliefandfunctionwithnon-operativemanagement,althoughbothformsoftreatmentresultedindecreasedrangeofmotion.Allfour-partfractureshadanoverallpooroutcomeregardlessoftreatmentmodality,buttension-bandwiringdidseemtoimprovefunctionandmo-tionintheseinjuries.However,theseinvestigatorsrecom-mendedinternalfixationoffour-partfracturesonlyforthevalgus-impactedfractures.Otherwise,theirrecommendationwasforprostheticreplacement. AretrospectivestudybyZyto5lookedat17three-andfour-part fractures in15patients,withameanageof66years,whoweretreatednon-operativelyandfollowedforaminimumof10years.Althoughthesamplesizewassmall,thisstudyisuniqueinitslong-termfollow-up.AllpatientshadlowConstantscores,butallalsohadhighacceptanceoftheirshoulderconditiondespitedecreasedrangeofmotionandweakness.Thiswasbelievedtobemostlikelyduetothefactthatonlyfourpatientsreportedmildpain,andtherest,includingallofthepatientswithfour-partfractures,hadnopain.Asradiographsshowedthatonly3outof17ofthesefractureshadacceptablealignment,andonly7showedthegreatertuberosityinanacceptableposition,theauthorcon-cludedthattherewasnoclearrelationshipbetweenfracturereduction,functionaloutcome,andpatientsatisfaction. In 2001, Court-Brown and colleagues2 revisited theNeer classification in an epidemiological study of 1,027proximal humerus fractures.They concluded that certainfracturepatternsweremissedusingtheNeerclassification,includingthemostcommonfracturetypeseen:theimpactedbifocalfracture(AO11-B1.1)(Fig.6).Thisfracturepatternrepresentednearly15%ofallproximalhumerusfractures,while Neer three- and four-part fractures combined ac-countedforonly13%ofproximalhumerusfractures,withthe rare four-part fracture occurring in only 3% of the1,027fracturesevaluated.ThistypeB1.1fracturemayberepresentedbyaminimallydisplacedfracture,adisplaced

Figure 6AOTypeB1.1impactedbifocalfracture.

Page 7: Proximal Humerus Fractures in the Elderlypresentationgrafix.com/_dev/cake/files/archive/pdfs/631.pdf · Proximal humerus fractures in the elderly are a relatively rare injury,

30 Bulletin• Hospital for Joint Diseases Volume62,Numbers1&2 2004

two-partsurgicalneckfracture,adisplacedtwo-partgreatertuberosityfracture,orathree-partvariantwithsignificantdisplacementofboththesurgicalneckandgreatertuberos-itywithvalgusimpaction(Fig.7).Inaretrospectivereviewevaluatingthisspecificfracturepattern,Court-Brownandassociates6reviewed125patientswithB1.1fractureswithameanageof71yearswhoallhadavalgusimpactedB1.1fracture treatednon-operatively.All fracturesunitedwith80.6%goodtoexcellentresultsatoneyearusingtheNeercriteria.Therewasagreaterimprovementinsubjectivethanobjectivemeasures.Thepatientsaveragedonly75%abduc-tionandflexionpowerandhadmarkedlylimitedinternalandexternalrotationafteroneyear,withmeanpowerjustover70%ofnormal.However,subjectivelypatientsperceivedtheirstrengthasgreaterthan90%ofnormalinallfracturepatternsexceptthethree-partvariant,inwhichpowerwasstillperceivedatgreaterthan85%ofnormal.Fullglenohu-meralmovementorpowerclearlyisnotrequiredforelderlypatients to return to routine activities. Comparing theirresultstothoseofotherstudiesevaluatingbothoperativeandnon-operativemanagement,7,17,20,21,24,30theinvestigators

concludedthattherewaslittleevidencethatoperativetreat-mentofimpactedvalgusthree-partfracturesintheelderlyprovidesanybenefitandtheyrecommendednon-operativemanagement.

Figure 7Different typesofB1.1 fracturesincludingaminimallydisplacedfracture(A),a displaced two-part surgical neck fracture(B), a displaced two-part greater tuberos-ityfracture(C),orathree-partvariantwithsignificantdisplacementofboththesurgicalneckandgreatertuberositywithvalgusim-paction(D).(Reprintedwithpermissionfrom:Court-BrownCM,CattermoleH,McQueenMM: Impacted valgus fractures (B1.1) ofthe proximal humerus:The results of non-operative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Br84(4):504-508, 2002.)

A

DC

B

Figure 8AOTypeA3.2translatedtwo-partfracture.

Page 8: Proximal Humerus Fractures in the Elderlypresentationgrafix.com/_dev/cake/files/archive/pdfs/631.pdf · Proximal humerus fractures in the elderly are a relatively rare injury,

31 Bulletin• Hospital for Joint Diseases Volume62,Numbers1&2 2004

Despite the large number of studies addressingmanagement of displaced proximal humerus fractures inthe literature, most of them refer to three- and four-partfractures.A prospective study of 126 displaced two-partfracturesfollowedforfiveyearsinpatientswithameanageof72yearsshowedinterestingresults.8Allpatientshadatranslatedtwo-partfracture(AO11-A3.2)(Fig.8),which,basedontheinvestigators’previousepidemiologicalstudy,2represents12.7%ofallproximalhumerusfractures.Mostofthepatientshadgreaterthan67%translationplusposteriorangulation.Allfracturesweretreatednon-operatively;allunited(Fig.9)andallhadahighNeerscoreatoneyear.Aswithpreviousstudies, thepatients’subjectiveviewoftheirprogresswasbetterthantheobjectivemeasures.Goodorexcellentresultswereseenin64.5%ofpatients.Therewasnocorrelationbetweentranslationorangulationandapatient’sabilitytoreturntodailyactivities.Thesepatientswere compared to anoperative cohort, alsowith at least66%translation,andtherewasfoundtobenodifferenceinNeerscoresatoneyear.Surgerydidnotimproveoutcomesregardless of the amount of initial translation. Based ontheseresults,theseinvestigatorsdonotrecommendinternalfixationofanytwo-partfracturesintheelderlyregardlessofdegreeofinitialdisplacement.

ConclusionsDespitethelargenumberofretrospectivereviewsandcaseseriesdetailingresultsofoperativetreatmentofproximalhumerus fractures, newer literature is trending towardsupportofnon-operative treatmentofdisplaced two-partfractures and most three-part fractures, as there appearstobenodifferenceinfunctionaloutcomeswithoperativeversusnon-operativetreatment.Thetreatmentofchoiceforfour-partfracturesremainsunclear–partlyduetotheirlowincidenceinmoststudies–butcurrentliteraturecontinuestosupportoperativetreatmentoffour-partfracturesintheelderly.Limitedopenreductioninternalfixationisrecom-mended for the stable four-part valgus impacted fractureandhemiarthroplastyformoreunstablefour-partfractures

includinghead-splittingfractures,anatomicneckfractures,and head impression fractures. Results in the literaturecontinuetoshowthat,althoughnoonehasmatchedNeer’sresults,hemiarthroplastyforfour-partfracturescanprovidepredictablepainrelief,butunpredictablefunction.31,32Well-designed,multicenter,prospective,randomizedstudiesareneededtoprovidetrueevidence-basedtreatmentrecommen-dationsforthesecomplexandcontroversialinjuries.

References1. HorakJ,NilssonBE:Epidemiologyoffractureoftheupper

endofthehumerus.ClinOrthop(112):250-253, 1975.2. Court-BrownCM,GargA,McQueenMM:Theepidemiology

ofproximalhumeralfractures.ActaOrthopScand72(4):365-371, 2001.

3. NeerC:Displacedproximalhumeralfractures:PartI.Clas-sificationandevaluation.JBoneJointSurgAm52:1077-1089, 1970.

4. Schlegel TF, Hawkins RJ: Displaced proximal humeralfractures:Evaluationandtreatment.JAmAcadOrthopSurg2(1):54-78, 1994.

5. ZytoK:Non-operativetreatmentofcomminutedfracturesoftheproximalhumerusinelderlypatients.Injury29(5):349-352, 1998.

6. Court-BrownCM,CattermoleH,McQueenMM:Impactedvalgusfractures(B1.1)oftheproximalhumerus:Theresultsofnon-operativetreatment.JBoneJointSurgBr84(4):504-508, 2002.

7. IlchmannT,OchsnerPE,WingstrandH,etal:Non-operativetreatmentversus tension-bandosteosynthesis in three- andfour-partproximalhumeralfractures:Aretrospectivestudyof34fracturesfromtwodifferenttraumacenters.IntOrthop22(5):316-320, 1998.

8. Court-BrownCM,GargA,McQueenMM:The translatedtwo-partfractureoftheproximalhumerus:Epidemiologyandoutcomeintheolderpatient.JBoneJointSurgBr83(6):799-804, 2001.

9. HandollHH,GibsonJN,MadhokR:Interventionsfortreatingproximalhumeralfracturesinadults.CochraneDatabaseSystRev(4):CD000434, 2003.

10. MisraA,KapurR,MaffulliN:Complexproximalhumeralfracturesinadults:Asystematicreviewofmanagement.Injury

Figure 9TypeA3.2fractureshowing100%displacement(A)andsubsequenthealingbybridgingacrossthefracturesite(B).(Reprintedwithpermissionfrom:Court-BrownCM,GargA, McQueen MM:The translated two-partfractureoftheproximalhumerus:Epidemiol-ogyandoutcomeintheolderpatient.JBoneJointSurgBr83(6):799-804, 2001.)

A B

Page 9: Proximal Humerus Fractures in the Elderlypresentationgrafix.com/_dev/cake/files/archive/pdfs/631.pdf · Proximal humerus fractures in the elderly are a relatively rare injury,

32 Bulletin• Hospital for Joint Diseases Volume62,Numbers1&2 2004

32(5):363-372, 2001.11. SidorML,ZuckermanJD,LyonT,etal:TheNeerclassifica-

tionsystemforproximalhumeralfractures:Anassessmentofinterobserverreliabilityandintraobserverreproducibility.JBoneJointSurgAm75(12):1745-1750, 1993.

12. SiebenrockKA,GerberC:Thereproducibilityofclassifica-tionoffracturesoftheproximalendofthehumerus.JBoneJointSurgAm75(12):1751-1755, 1993.

13. Fractureanddislocationcompendium.OrthopaedicTraumaAssociationCommitteeforCodingandClassification.JOr-thopTrauma10(Suppl1):36-40, 1996.

14. Muller ME NS, Koch P, Schatzker J: The Comprehensive Classification of Fractures of Long Bones. NewYork:SpringerVerlag,1990.

15. NaranjaRJ Jr., Iannotti JP:Displaced three- and four-partproximalhumerusfractures:Evaluationandmanagement.JAmAcadOrthopSurg8(6):373-382, 2000.

16. HawkinsRJ,BellRH,GurrK:Thethree-partfractureoftheproximalpartofthehumerus:Operativetreatment.JBoneJointSurgAm68(9):1410-1414, 1986.

17. HintermannB,TrouillierHH,SchaferD:Rigidinternalfixa-tionoffracturesoftheproximalhumerusinolderpatients.JBoneJointSurgBr82(8):1107-1112, 2000.

18. HessmannM,GotzenL,GehlingH,etal:Operativetreatmentofdisplacedproximalhumeralfractures:Two-yearresultsin99cases.ActaChirBelg98(5):212-219, 1998.

19. JakobRP,MiniaciA,AnsonPS,etal:Four-partvalgusim-pactedfracturesoftheproximalhumerus.JBoneJointSurgBr73(2):295-298, 1991.

20. ReschH,PovaczP,FrohlichR,etal:Percutaneousfixationofthree-andfour-partfracturesoftheproximalhumerus.JBoneJointSurgBr79(2):295-300, 1997.

21. ZytoK,AhrengartL,SperberA,etal:Treatmentofdisplacedproximalhumeralfracturesinelderlypatients.JBoneJoint

SurgBr79(3):412-417, 1997.22. KovalK,SandersR,ZuckermanJD,etal:Modifiedtension

bandwiringofdisplacedsurgicalneckfracturesofthehu-merus.JShoulderElbowSurg2:85, 1993.

23. JabergH,WarnerJJ, JakobRP:Percutaneousstabilizationofunstablefracturesofthehumerus.JBoneJointSurgAm74(4):508-515, 1992.

24. AdedapoAO, Ikpeme JO:The results of internal fixationofthree-andfour-partproximalhumeralfractureswiththePolarusnail.Injury32(2):115-121, 2001.

25. KristiansenB,ChristensenSW:Platefixationofproximalhumeralfractures.ActaOrthopScand57(4):320-323, 1986.

26. SzyszkowitzR,SegglW,SchleiferP,etal:Proximalhumeralfractures:Managementtechniquesandexpectedresults.ClinOrthop(292):13-25, 1993.

27. GibsonJN,HandollHH,MadhokR:Interventionsfortreatingproximalhumeralfracturesinadults.CochraneDatabaseSystRev(2):CD000434, 2002.

28. GibsonJN,HandollHH,MadhokR:Interventionsfortreatingproximalhumeralfracturesinadults.CochraneDatabaseSystRev(1):CD000434, 2001.

29. ConstantCR,MurleyAH:Aclinicalmethodoffunctionalas-sessmentoftheshoulder.ClinOrthop(214):160-164, 1987.

30. HessmannM,BaumgaertelF,GehlingH,etal:Platefixationofproximalhumeralfractureswithindirectreduction:Surgicaltechniqueandresultsutilizingthreeshoulderscores.Injury30(7):453-462, 1999.

31. GoldmanRT,KovalKJ,CuomoF,etal:Functionaloutcomeafterhumeralheadreplacementforacutethree-andfour-partproximalhumeralfractures.JShoulderElbowSurg4(2):81-86, 1995.

32. Mighell MA, Kolm GP, Collinge CA, et al: Outcomes ofhemiarthroplasty for fractures of the proximal humerus. JShoulderElbowSurg12(6):569-577, 2003.