prosesseringsteknologi for økt utnyttelse av korn og ... · prosesseringsteknologi for økt...
TRANSCRIPT
Prosesseringsteknologi for økt utnyttelse
av korn og belgvekster.
Stefan SahlstrømAvd. Mat og Helse
Arbeidet med planteprotein til mat – skjer samarbeidsprosjektet
«FoodProFuture»
Nofima ansvarlig for Wp3. Prosessering
Finansiert av
BIONÆR
programmet,
Norges
Forskningsråd
Prosjekt 267858
Varighet:
01.4 2017 – 31.03. 21
Research partners:
NMBU, Nofima, NIBIO, Østfoldforskning,
NTNU, OsloMet, RISE (SE), LUKE (FI), VTT (FI), CSGA (F), UFT (Bul)
Industy partners:
AgriAnalyse, AM Nutrition, BAMA, Borregård, Gartnerhallen, Halogen, Hoff, Lantmannen Cerealia, Mills, NLR, Norsk Matraps, Orkla Foods Norge, Skala
Fokus i «FoodProFuture» er belgvekster og
korn.
Norges miljø- og biovitenskapelige universitet 3
Belgvekster/legumes:
Gule erter og åker-
bønner (faba beans)Høy proteinkonsentrasjon i frø
20 -35 /% protein
Kornarter:
Bygg og havreProduktive, lette å dyrke
10 – 14% protein
Bidrar mye til verdens
proteinforsyning
Pseudocerealer:Eksempel: Bokhvete, quinoa,
amarant, chia, ..
Middels høy proteinkonsentrasjon
Høyt innhold av mineraler og
vitaminer
Potet:Protein utgjør 5-8%
av tørrstoffet
Gunstig AA
sammensetning
Fettproduserende
vekster:Viktig for produksjon av matolje
Har også høyt proteininnhold
4
1. Overview of FoodProFutureWP3 – Processing technologies and model foods
Raw-materials
(pulses/cereals)
• Peas (var. Ingrid)
• Faba beans (var. Kontuand Vertigo)
• Oat
• Barley
• Etc…
Tørr fraksjonering –maling og sikting
Dry-Fractionation
• High-protein fractions
Characterization
• Solid-state analysis (morphology, particle size)
• Composition (protein, starch, fiber contents, …)
• Techno-Functional properties
• (…)
Development of model food products
• Extrusion technology
• Baking
• Homogenization
AIM of WP3: Protein-rich ingredients and model food products based on dry fractionation combined with other sustainable processing technologies
5
2. Dry fractionation – PrincipleNon-chemical sustainable production of protein concentrates from pulses and cereals
Dry-fractionation
Air-classification
Milling
Wet-fractionation(conventional)
Dry-fractionation(non-chemical)
Water addition Yes No
Use of enzymes & chemicals Yes No
Functionality Modified Native
Side-streams High Minimal
Drying step Yes No
Separation ofparticlesbased on
densities and sizes
Milling Air classification
Reduce PS and detach
starchgranules and
protein bodies
Pelgrom et al., 2013:- Starch granules ( 22 µm)- Protein bodies (1-3 µm)- Whole cells or part of cells (>40 µm)
2 steps
Wheel
6
2. Dry fractionation – Configuration / Set-up
Dry-fractionation
Air-classification
Milling
Feedvessel
Classifierwheel
Coarse particles(Starchconcentrate)
Fine particles(Protein concentrate)
Filters
Pin mill
Rotating pin discs
Impact against the grinding pins
Feed rate
Speed of rotors
Principle of centrifugal
counterflowHigh-speed
deflector wheel
Flour
Air flowrate
Speed of wheel
Non-chemical sustainable production of protein concentrates from pulses and cereals
Transportedby air flow
@ Nofima
Saldanha do Carmo et al., 2020, Is dehulling of peas and faba beans necessary prior to dry fractionation for the production of protein- and starch-rich fractions? Impact on physical properties, chemical composition and techno-functional properties, JFE, 278
7
2. Dry fractionationProduction of protein concentrates from yellow peas and faba beans
Raw-materials
Yellow peas (Var. Ingrid)
Faba beans (Var. Kontu)
Crushing and milling
Air-classification
FINE fraction (protein-enriched)
COARSE fraction(starch-enriched)
Cell wall
(fiber)
Starch
granuleProtein
bodies
Yellow peas flour
Protein content
20.4 - 21.3
Starch content
49.3 - 53.1
Dietary fiber
7.5 - 14.6
Faba bean flour
Protein content
30.1 - 34.1
Starch content
38.2 - 43.4
Dietary fiber
7.1 - 15.7
Yellow
peas
Fine fraction
Protein content
44.0 - 46.2
Starch content
10.5 - 12.4
Dietary fiber
17.0 - 17.8
Faba
beans
Fine fraction
Protein content
60.0 - 60.9
Starch content
7.92 - 14.9
Dietary fiber
10.0 - 10.3
Yellow
peas
Coarse fraction
Protein content
8.7 - 8.9
Starch content
63.7 - 72.5
Dietary fiber
4.6 - 16.1
Faba
beans
Coarse fraction
Protein content
21.5 - 25.5
Starch content
50.9 - 56.0
Dietary fiber
6.4 - 14.9
Values are in % dm
8
2. Dry fractionation
Raw-materials
Faba beans
Crushing and milling
Air-classification
FINE fraction(protein-enriched)
COARSE fraction(starch-enriched)
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 5000 10000 15000 20000
%l
rpm
Vertigo 2017 Utbytte og proteininnhold vs ATP
hastighet
Utbytte fin fraksjon (%) Protein (N*6,25 %) Fin fraksjon
Åkerbønner forskjell mellom år
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000
%
rpm
Vertigo 2018Utbytte og proteininnhold vs ATP hastighet
Utbytte fin fraksjon (%) Protein (N*6,25 %) Fin fraksjon
Høyere proteininnhold i proteinfraksjon 2018 enn 2017, henholdvis 78% og 62 %. Samme utbytte ca 20 %.
9
2. Dry fractionation
Raw-materials
Faba beans
Crushing and milling
Air-classification
FINE fraction(protein-enriched)
COARSE fraction(starch-enriched)
Bygg forskjell mellom sorter
Litt høyere proteininnhold i proteinfraksjon fra Arild enn RGT planet, henholdsvis 28% og 22 %. Samme utbytte ca 15 %.
0,0
10,0
20,0
30,0
40,0
50,0
60,0
70,0
80,0
90,0
0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000
%
rpm
RGT Planet Utbytte og proteininnhold vs ATP hastighet
Utbytte fin fraksjon
Protein fin fraksjon (%)
0,0
10,0
20,0
30,0
40,0
50,0
60,0
70,0
80,0
90,0
0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000
%
rpm
Arild Utbytte og proteininnhold vs ATP hastighet
Utbytte fin fraksjon
Protein fin fraksjon (%)
10
3. Extrusion TechnologyPrinciple and set-up
Raw material feeding
Compressive and shearing forces
Increasing heat transferDie headExtrudate
(≠ shapes)
Barrel
Drive
Screw
T, P
Die
Final product properties
Raw-material is fed into the extruder barrel, transported by one or two screws,mixed, heated and cooked in the screw section (Gelatinization / Denaturation)
The die section shapes andforms the final extrudate
Extrudere (lat.) = to press / drive outThe food extruder is considered a high-temperature short time (HTST) bioreactorthat transforms a variety of raw ingredients into modified intermediate andfinished products(J. M. Harper, 1979/1981)
* In the case of a twin-screw extruder, the screwconfiguration can be buildby the operator
Unit operationsMixingDough
formingCompression
Gelatinization/Denaturation
PressurizingShapingExpansion
11
4. Model Food Products by Extrusion Technology
Enriched-fractions obtained by milling and air-classification are being incorporated into innovative model food productswith improved health, sensorial and functional properties mostly through extrusion technology
@ Nofima
12
4.1 Pasta products
Tnozzle = 90°C
Durum-wheat-based
Different shapes of pasta fortified with pea protein (PP) obtained by extrusion (low temperature, no pressure)
100 (w %) durum wheat
(DW)
85 % DW15% Pea Protein (PP)
60% DW40% PP
No expansion
Simple screwconfiguration
13
4.2 Snacks
100 % w/w corn starch (CS)
Corn starch-based
Corn snacks fortified with peaprotein (PP), obtained by extrusion(high pressure, high temperature)
Incre
asing
pro
tein
con
ten
t
85:15 % w/w CS:PP
60:40 % w/w CS:PP
High expansion
Low expansion
There is no expansion at higherprotein levels
Screw configuration with more shearing elements
14
4.2 Healthier SnacksBackground and Aim
Explore the production of an expanded healthy snack entirely based on pea- and oat-rich fractions by Extrusion Technology
Ready-to-eat healthy snack
(Extrusion Technology)
Oatfiber
Pea starch
Pea protein
Snacks normally existing on the market are mostly based on corn or rice starch withlow nutritional quality due to their high energy density and poorness in nutrients
Pea and oat ingredients seems to be perfect candidates to produce healthier snacks,high in fiber and with an interesting nutrient profile
Balanced amino acid profile
Existing studies are based on milled flours and not enriched fractions
15
4.2 Healtier SnacksProcess optimization
Saldanha do Carmo et al., LWT (2019)
-glucan was not degraded by extrusion
expansion
16
4.3 Meat analogues by Dry texturizationLow-moisture extrusion cooking (LME)
100 % w/w soy protein concentrate (SPC)0% w/w pea fiber (PF)0% w/w oat fiber (OF)
80:20 % w/w SPC:PF 80:20 % w/w SPC:OF
Soaking
GrindingFormulation of
meat-freeproduct
Soy protein concentrate + Pea fiber and Oat fiber= Protein concentrate
TVP
17
4.4 Meat analogues by Wet texturizationHigh-moisture extrusion cooking (HME)
Cooling section will allow the fast cooling of the cookedprotein and directional shear in order to build a laminarstructure. The anisotropic layers form a meat-like textureand a bite-feel
With a high moisturecontent and no moistureloss throught cooling down,no re-hydration is required
Non-expanded fibrousproduct
= Protein concentrate
18
4.4 Meat analogues by Wet texturizationHigh-moisture extrusion cooking (HME)
Soy protein
100 % w/w Soy protein
80:20 % w/w Soyprotein:Fiber
source (Pea fiber)
Pea protein
fraction
100 % w/w Pea protein
Bean protein fraction
100% w/w Bean protein
63.5% dm protein3.5% dm starch
10% dm NSP
55% dm protein6% dm starch13% dm NSP
67% dm protein
55% dm protein
19
5. Take home message
Model Food
Products
Dry-fractionation
ExtrusionTechnology
Baking
Bread and energy bar
Pasta,
breakfast
cereal and
snacks
Meat analogues
Liquid foodsSoups, smoothies
etc.
Ingredienser med høyt proteininnhold og modellmat produkter kan produseres ved hjelp av bærekraftige og løsemiddelfrie teknologier som tørrfraksjonering og ekstruderingsteknologi
Proteinene i proteinfraksjon som fås ved bruk av tørrfraksjonering er ikke rene men beholder sin struktur og funksjonalitet
20
Takk for oppmerksamheten