proprietary & confidential 1 drug efficacy in the wild tim vaughan 17 june 2011

22
Drug Efficacy in the Wild Tim Vaughan 17 June 2011

Upload: rudolf-eaton

Post on 21-Jan-2016

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Proprietary & Confidential 1 Drug Efficacy in the Wild Tim Vaughan 17 June 2011

Proprietary & Confidential 1

Drug Efficacy in the WildTim Vaughan17 June 2011

Page 2: Proprietary & Confidential 1 Drug Efficacy in the Wild Tim Vaughan 17 June 2011

Proprietary & Confidential 2

Contents

PatientsLikeMe What can MikeFromFinland teach us, and vice versa? Lithium delays progression of ALS?! PatientsLikeMe’s observational study Finding patients like me Results Predictive modeling / What is my outcome? Concluding remarks

Page 3: Proprietary & Confidential 1 Drug Efficacy in the Wild Tim Vaughan 17 June 2011

Proprietary & Confidential 3

PatientsLikeMe web site

Page 4: Proprietary & Confidential 1 Drug Efficacy in the Wild Tim Vaughan 17 June 2011

Proprietary & Confidential 4

PatientsLikeMe background – Three brothers

Page 5: Proprietary & Confidential 1 Drug Efficacy in the Wild Tim Vaughan 17 June 2011

Proprietary & Confidential 5

Stephen Heywood (alsking101)

Page 6: Proprietary & Confidential 1 Drug Efficacy in the Wild Tim Vaughan 17 June 2011

Proprietary & Confidential 6

What can Mike teach us, and vice versa?

Lithium

Page 7: Proprietary & Confidential 1 Drug Efficacy in the Wild Tim Vaughan 17 June 2011

Proprietary & Confidential 7

Lithium delays progression of ALS?!

Fornai et al., PNAS 105:2052-2057 (2008)

Page 8: Proprietary & Confidential 1 Drug Efficacy in the Wild Tim Vaughan 17 June 2011

Proprietary & Confidential 9

Timeline

Page 9: Proprietary & Confidential 1 Drug Efficacy in the Wild Tim Vaughan 17 June 2011

Proprietary & Confidential 10

Patients track their progress

Page 10: Proprietary & Confidential 1 Drug Efficacy in the Wild Tim Vaughan 17 June 2011

Proprietary & Confidential 11

The “kitchen sink” plot

Page 11: Proprietary & Confidential 1 Drug Efficacy in the Wild Tim Vaughan 17 June 2011

Proprietary & Confidential 12

Random control may not be a “patient like me”

Page 12: Proprietary & Confidential 1 Drug Efficacy in the Wild Tim Vaughan 17 June 2011

Proprietary & Confidential 13

Demographics – age

Page 13: Proprietary & Confidential 1 Drug Efficacy in the Wild Tim Vaughan 17 June 2011

Proprietary & Confidential 14

Demographics – onset site

Page 14: Proprietary & Confidential 1 Drug Efficacy in the Wild Tim Vaughan 17 June 2011

Proprietary & Confidential 15

Demographics – sex

Page 15: Proprietary & Confidential 1 Drug Efficacy in the Wild Tim Vaughan 17 June 2011

Proprietary & Confidential 16

Matching algorithm

Page 16: Proprietary & Confidential 1 Drug Efficacy in the Wild Tim Vaughan 17 June 2011

Proprietary & Confidential 17

Matching across the entire sample

Page 17: Proprietary & Confidential 1 Drug Efficacy in the Wild Tim Vaughan 17 June 2011

Proprietary & Confidential 18

Pre-treatment progression bias reduced

Page 18: Proprietary & Confidential 1 Drug Efficacy in the Wild Tim Vaughan 17 June 2011

Proprietary & Confidential 19

Results of lithium treatment

Page 19: Proprietary & Confidential 1 Drug Efficacy in the Wild Tim Vaughan 17 June 2011

Proprietary & Confidential 20

Kaplan-Meier for patients & data

Page 20: Proprietary & Confidential 1 Drug Efficacy in the Wild Tim Vaughan 17 June 2011

Proprietary & Confidential 21

Biases and other stuff that worried us

Self-selection for treatment “Recruitment bias” Data reported (vs. data opportunity) Outliers (e.g. PMA and PLS) “Optimism bias” at treatment start

Page 21: Proprietary & Confidential 1 Drug Efficacy in the Wild Tim Vaughan 17 June 2011

Proprietary & Confidential 22

What Mike (and PatientsLikeMe) can learn

Page 22: Proprietary & Confidential 1 Drug Efficacy in the Wild Tim Vaughan 17 June 2011

Proprietary & Confidential 23

Conclusions

Structured, self-reported patient data, despite being subject to bias (like all patient data!), has value

Think about bias, and then think about bias again (Repeat) “Pair programming” for statistics