promos and interfaces coms 426 (television studies)
TRANSCRIPT
Promos and InterfacesCOMS 426 (TELEVISION STUDIES)
PROMOS
Gray, Jonathan. "'Coming up Next': Promos in the Future of Television and Television Studies." Journal of Popular Film & Television 38, no. 2 (2010): 54‐57.
PROMOS –
30,000 promos per year on American Networks, in process giving up $4 billion in ad revenue
Promos and Indents
Example – CTV extended promo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jWeknOUQAcs
1985 CBC promo – Look Againhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0idZAi5vZBU
CBC Promo – Canada lives here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cC4O7SCCh-Y
Indents
Creating familiarity with the characters – bonding with the audience
CBC indent
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-l4RIBr842I
CTV indent with Jon Stewart
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EMXQgYfkxTk
Transcending the binary
Art vs promotion
Text vs. ad
Show vs. peripheral
Promo is part and parcel of the whole – we need to look at it in the same way that we scrutinize texts/programs
Promos as “paratext”
Promos quite frequently create a text.
Framing the show – giving the audience a sense of what it is about
Creating tone, mood, and sensibility
Paratext (Gerard Genette) – material surrounding books, e.g. typeface, covers, prefaces
Promos as frames
Intertextual and evaluative allowing viewers to make sense of the show
Establishing audience contact with characters, plots, storylines
Allowing the station a way to brand itself – to show itself as carrying a variety of different programs and therefore, catering to a variety of audiences.
Network/channel is on sale as much as is the program. In fact, the program becomes the way in which the channel sells itself
Indents
Also a way of branding the station/network
Uses star characters or familiar figures as a way of creating a bond with the audience
Framing television viewing
“…textuality and meanings of a channel and of a show are always contingent on one another. To understand a show textually, we may be required to study a channel textually.”
Interfaces
Chamberlain, Daniel. "Television Interfaces." Journal of Popular Film & Television 38, no. 2 (2010): 84-88.
Viewing now occurs through a variety of different platforms – but what does that mean?
- such viewing is now facilitated by the interfaces that are available on these platforms
Predicated on an ideology of usability and simplicity
3 parts of interfaces
1. The physical means of interacting
2. Screen-based displays
3. Dedicated software
Interfaces
Demand and encourage interactivity – inviting viewers
Promising greater control and customization, e.g. wishlists, favorites, playlists.
Control over what and when to watch
Streamline content to suit the user – reducing the degree of findability, navigating and managing huge streams of data
Interfaces – reframe the programs
Introduce new metadata-based aesthetics
Alter the rhythms of the time we spend with television
Reveal struggles among media corporations
“emergent media ontologies of customization, navigation, and control are invested and contested”
Drawbacks
- we are trained to become more efficient television consumers
Illusion of power
Generates user data which can be used by marketers and which is often sold by the interface company to advertisers
Increased surveillance of users