project partners: funded by: societal age disparities in health care: observation from hk compared...
TRANSCRIPT
Project Partners:Funded by:
Societal Age Disparities in Health Care:Observation from HK compared with the UK
B Mak, J Woo, A Bowling, F Wong, PH Chau
2
Project Partners:Funded by:
Ageing Population &Public Health Expenditure
Ageing population in Hong Kong• People over age 65 will increase from 13% in 2009 to 28% in
2039.
• Ageing population will lead to an increase in chronic disease and disability burden on health care system.
Public health expenditure• $37.8 billion in 2004 (14.7% of the total government budget)
• $186.6 billion in 2033 (27.3% of the total government budget)
3
Project Partners:Funded by:
Needs for Prioritization
HK government healthcare budget is unable to keep up with the demand.
Some form of rationing in health services seems to be inevitable.
However, there has been • No official acknowledgement of the needs for prioritization
• Little discussion of this issue among policy makers, professionals and the general public
4
Project Partners:Funded by:
The Present Study
Objectives:• To examine how HK people view health care
prioritization− Older people have a greater health care need than
others.− Prioritize older people / elderly services over others?− Any difference between healthcare professionals and
the public view of prioritization?
• To compare the findings with those from a UK survey (Bowling, 1996)
− Any difference between HK and UK people?
5
Project Partners:Funded by:
Methodology
Survey:• An opinion survey was conducted in HK from January to
November 2009.
Participants:• 1,512 people aged 18+ participated.
− 117 of them were healthcare professionals.
Questionnaire:• The design was based on the one used by Bowling (1996).
6
Project Partners:Funded by:
The Questionnaire (i)
1. Respondents were asked to prioritize 12 health services:− Treatment for children with life threatening illness − Treatment for people aged 75 and over with life threatening illness− Long stay hospital care for elderly people− Special care and pain relief for people who are dying− District nursing and community services / care at home− Treatment for infertility− Psychiatric services for people with mental illness− Surgery, such as hip replacement, to help people carry out everyday tasks− Preventive screening services and immunizations− High technology surgery, organ transplants and procedures which treat life
threatening conditions− Health promotion / education services to help people lead healthy lives− Intensive care for premature babies who weigh less than 680g with only a
slight chance of survival
7
Project Partners:Funded by:
The Questionnaire (ii)
2. Respondents were asked who they thought should set priorities and to select their preference from a list:
− Doctors at local level − Hospital mangers− Hospital Authority− Politicians and the government− The public
8
Project Partners:Funded by:
Results (i)
Priority Ranking of the 12 Health Services :1. Treatment for children
2. High technology surgery3. Preventive screening services4. Surgery to help people carry out everyday tasks5. Health promotion / education services6. Psychiatric services7. District nursing & community services / care at home8. Long stay hospital care for elderly people9. Treatment for people aged >7510. Special care & pain relief for people who are dying11. Intensive care for premature babies12. Treatment for infertility
Healthcare professionals vs. General public
9
Project Partners:Funded by:
Results (ii)
“If resources are to be rationed, higher priority should be given to treating the young rather than the elderly.”
• 44% agreed (vs. 34% disagreed)
“Surveys of the general public’s opinions, like this one, should be used in the planning of health services.”
• 77% agreed
10
Project Partners:Funded by:
Results (iii)
Respondents were asked to rank who should set priorities:
• Doctors at local level (43%)• The public (21%)• Hospital Authority (19%)• Hospital mangers (11%)• Politicians and the government (6%)
“The responsibility for rationing health care should rest with doctors.”
• 48% agreed (vs. 34% disagreed)
11
Project Partners:Funded by:
UK Results (iii)
“The responsibility for rationing health care should rest with doctors.”
• 75% agreed (vs. 15% disagreed)
“Surveys of the general public’s opinions, like this one, should be used in the planning of health services.”
• 91% agreed
“If resources are to be rationed, higher priority should be given to treating the young rather than the elderly.”
• 50% agreed (vs. 29% disagreed)
12
Project Partners:Funded by:
International ComparisonHK UK
Treatment for children 1 1
High technology surgery 2 7
Preventive screening services 3 3
Surgery to help people carry out everyday tasks 4 4
Health promotion / education services 5 8
Psychiatric services 6 6
District nursing and community services 7 5
Long stay hospital care for elderly people 8 10
Treatment for people aged >75 9 12
Special care & pain relief for people who are dying 10 2
Intensive care for premature babies 11 9
Treatment for infertility 12 11
13
Project Partners:Funded by:
International ComparisonHK UK
Treatment for children 1 1
High technology surgery 2 7
Preventive screening services 3 3
Surgery to help people carry out everyday tasks 4 4
Health promotion / education services 5 8
Psychiatric services 6 6
District nursing and community services 7 5
Long stay hospital care for elderly people 8 10
Treatment for people aged >75 9 12
Special care & pain relief for people who are dying 10 2
Intensive care for premature babies 11 9
Treatment for infertility 12 11
14
Project Partners:Funded by:
Discussion (i)
In HK, most people including healthcare professionals give priority to the young over the old in distributing a given amount of health care benefit:
• Services for the elderly, whether in the community or in hospitals, and including end-of-life, were ranked among the lowest.
Most people think that:• General public’s view of prioritization should be used in
the planning of health services.• The responsibility for rationing health care should rest with
doctors.
15
Project Partners:Funded by:
Discussion (ii)
HK health care policy needs to acknowledge constraints and the needs for prioritization
• To meet the needs of ageing societies• To meet the needs of all users equitably
The public and professionals should engage with policy makers in formulating a policy based on:
• Cost benefit considerations• Overall societal view of prioritization that is not based on
age alone