project partners: funded by: societal age disparities in health care: observation from hk compared...

16
Project Partners: Funded by: Societal Age Disparities in Health Care: Observation from HK compared with the UK B Mak, J Woo, A Bowling, F Wong, PH Cha u

Upload: clinton-hensley

Post on 17-Dec-2015

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Project Partners:Funded by:

Societal Age Disparities in Health Care:Observation from HK compared with the UK

B Mak, J Woo, A Bowling, F Wong, PH Chau

2

Project Partners:Funded by:

Ageing Population &Public Health Expenditure

Ageing population in Hong Kong• People over age 65 will increase from 13% in 2009 to 28% in

2039.

• Ageing population will lead to an increase in chronic disease and disability burden on health care system.

Public health expenditure• $37.8 billion in 2004 (14.7% of the total government budget)

• $186.6 billion in 2033 (27.3% of the total government budget)

3

Project Partners:Funded by:

Needs for Prioritization

HK government healthcare budget is unable to keep up with the demand.

Some form of rationing in health services seems to be inevitable.

However, there has been • No official acknowledgement of the needs for prioritization

• Little discussion of this issue among policy makers, professionals and the general public

4

Project Partners:Funded by:

The Present Study

Objectives:• To examine how HK people view health care

prioritization− Older people have a greater health care need than

others.− Prioritize older people / elderly services over others?− Any difference between healthcare professionals and

the public view of prioritization?

• To compare the findings with those from a UK survey (Bowling, 1996)

− Any difference between HK and UK people?

5

Project Partners:Funded by:

Methodology

Survey:• An opinion survey was conducted in HK from January to

November 2009.

Participants:• 1,512 people aged 18+ participated.

− 117 of them were healthcare professionals.

Questionnaire:• The design was based on the one used by Bowling (1996).

6

Project Partners:Funded by:

The Questionnaire (i)

1. Respondents were asked to prioritize 12 health services:− Treatment for children with life threatening illness − Treatment for people aged 75 and over with life threatening illness− Long stay hospital care for elderly people− Special care and pain relief for people who are dying− District nursing and community services / care at home− Treatment for infertility− Psychiatric services for people with mental illness− Surgery, such as hip replacement, to help people carry out everyday tasks− Preventive screening services and immunizations− High technology surgery, organ transplants and procedures which treat life

threatening conditions− Health promotion / education services to help people lead healthy lives− Intensive care for premature babies who weigh less than 680g with only a

slight chance of survival

7

Project Partners:Funded by:

The Questionnaire (ii)

2. Respondents were asked who they thought should set priorities and to select their preference from a list:

− Doctors at local level − Hospital mangers− Hospital Authority− Politicians and the government− The public

8

Project Partners:Funded by:

Results (i)

Priority Ranking of the 12 Health Services :1. Treatment for children

2. High technology surgery3. Preventive screening services4. Surgery to help people carry out everyday tasks5. Health promotion / education services6. Psychiatric services7. District nursing & community services / care at home8. Long stay hospital care for elderly people9. Treatment for people aged >7510. Special care & pain relief for people who are dying11. Intensive care for premature babies12. Treatment for infertility

Healthcare professionals vs. General public

9

Project Partners:Funded by:

Results (ii)

“If resources are to be rationed, higher priority should be given to treating the young rather than the elderly.”

• 44% agreed (vs. 34% disagreed)

“Surveys of the general public’s opinions, like this one, should be used in the planning of health services.”

• 77% agreed

10

Project Partners:Funded by:

Results (iii)

Respondents were asked to rank who should set priorities:

• Doctors at local level (43%)• The public (21%)• Hospital Authority (19%)• Hospital mangers (11%)• Politicians and the government (6%)

“The responsibility for rationing health care should rest with doctors.”

• 48% agreed (vs. 34% disagreed)

11

Project Partners:Funded by:

UK Results (iii)

“The responsibility for rationing health care should rest with doctors.”

• 75% agreed (vs. 15% disagreed)

“Surveys of the general public’s opinions, like this one, should be used in the planning of health services.”

• 91% agreed

“If resources are to be rationed, higher priority should be given to treating the young rather than the elderly.”

• 50% agreed (vs. 29% disagreed)

12

Project Partners:Funded by:

International ComparisonHK UK

Treatment for children 1 1

High technology surgery 2 7

Preventive screening services 3 3

Surgery to help people carry out everyday tasks 4 4

Health promotion / education services 5 8

Psychiatric services 6 6

District nursing and community services 7 5

Long stay hospital care for elderly people 8 10

Treatment for people aged >75 9 12

Special care & pain relief for people who are dying 10 2

Intensive care for premature babies 11 9

Treatment for infertility 12 11

13

Project Partners:Funded by:

International ComparisonHK UK

Treatment for children 1 1

High technology surgery 2 7

Preventive screening services 3 3

Surgery to help people carry out everyday tasks 4 4

Health promotion / education services 5 8

Psychiatric services 6 6

District nursing and community services 7 5

Long stay hospital care for elderly people 8 10

Treatment for people aged >75 9 12

Special care & pain relief for people who are dying 10 2

Intensive care for premature babies 11 9

Treatment for infertility 12 11

14

Project Partners:Funded by:

Discussion (i)

In HK, most people including healthcare professionals give priority to the young over the old in distributing a given amount of health care benefit:

• Services for the elderly, whether in the community or in hospitals, and including end-of-life, were ranked among the lowest.

Most people think that:• General public’s view of prioritization should be used in

the planning of health services.• The responsibility for rationing health care should rest with

doctors.

15

Project Partners:Funded by:

Discussion (ii)

HK health care policy needs to acknowledge constraints and the needs for prioritization

• To meet the needs of ageing societies• To meet the needs of all users equitably

The public and professionals should engage with policy makers in formulating a policy based on:

• Cost benefit considerations• Overall societal view of prioritization that is not based on

age alone

16

Project Partners:Funded by:

Age Disparities in Health Care

Q & A