project: eethylen fkz 033rc004a - co2net
TRANSCRIPT
Project: eEthylen
FKZ 033RC004ACO2Plus Status ConferenceFörderintiative des Bundesministeriums für Bildung und Forschung
Siemens Corporate Technology© Siemens AG 2018
Unrestricted © Siemens AG 2018
April 17, 2018 CO2-Plus Status-Conference, BerlinPage 2 Corporate Technology
eEthylen: The Vision
Substitution of a Steam-Cracker by a CO2-to-Ethylene Electrolyser
▪ Three PEM-Electrolyzer skids (SILYZER 200)
▪ 1.25 MW rated power (225 Nm³/h) / 2.1 MW peak power
▪ Highly dynamic: load changes in seconds, wide power range
▪ 35 bar outlet pressure
Commercial Siemens PEM H2O-ElectrolyzerCommercial Steam Cracker
Unrestricted © Siemens AG 2018
April 17, 2018 CO2-Plus Status-Conference, BerlinPage 3 Corporate Technology
eEthylene: The Technology
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201602114 ; C. Reller et. al. Adv. Energy Mater. 2017, 1602114
• Single step electrochemical reduction of CO2 in aqueous electrolytes
• The product distribution is strongly dependent on the electro catalyst
• Cu based catalyst produce hydrocarbons, Ag produce CO
• Ethylene formation involves 2 CO2 molecules, 12 electrons,
8 water molecules to produce 1 ethylene molecule associated
with 12 hydroxide ions (see picture).
Targets of eEthylene
• Find & develop a stable catalyst
• Elaborate the reduction mechanism
• Prepare a gas diffusion electrode out of the catalyst to bring the topic
to industrial relevance (current density >> 200 mA/cm²)
• Scaling to x00 cm² of electrode area
Unrestricted © Siemens AG 2018
April 17, 2018 CO2-Plus Status-Conference, BerlinPage 4 Corporate Technology
eEthylene: Why ethylene – Economics
Can renewable feedstock production become economical viable ?
Ratio between the Economical Value and the Heating Value for a given point in time
Thermodynamic considerations with
100 % efficiency assumption
Energy
Demand
Min. Energy
Cost 1Product
Value
Cost Covering
min. System
Efficiency
MWh / t € / t € / t %
Methane 15,4 463 - 694 150 308 - 463
Ethylene 13,9 419 - 629 1000 42 - 63
1 electricity cost 30 €/MWh; tax & net use 15 €/MWh(there is no excess energy)
Burning Processes
Methane CH4 + 2 O2 CO2 + 2 H2O + 15,4 MWh/t
Ethylene C2H4 + 3 O2 2 CO2 + 2 H2O + 13,9 MWh/t
Synthesis by Single Step Electrochemical CO2 Reduction
Methane CO2 + 2 H2O + min. 15,4 MWh/t CH4 + 2 O2
Ethylene 2 CO2 + 2 H2O + min. 13,9 MWh/t C2H4 + 3 O2
A factor of ~4 might be enough
to compensate for all losses
Unrestricted © Siemens AG 2018
April 17, 2018 CO2-Plus Status-Conference, BerlinPage 5 Corporate Technology
Catalyst preparation GDE Preparation Characterization/ mechanistics
Collaboration and Workflow
Characterization of alloys (CVD/PVD)
pre-charaterization of powder catalysts
In-situ deposited copper catalyst
Preparation of powder based catalysts Preparation of GDEs
Evaluation of different process parameter
Electrochemical characterization at high
current densitiesIn-situ and operando characterization
Upscaling potential
LCA
LCA
Identification of intermediates/ co-products
material exchange
information exchange
mechanistics
Unrestricted © Siemens AG 2018
April 17, 2018 CO2-Plus Status-Conference, BerlinPage 6 Corporate Technology
Ethylene: How we got startet ?
GDE with in-situ grown Copper-NP catalyst in a flow cell setup
• The maximum FE for ethylene (45 - 57%) is reached after ~50 min
• Current density of 170 mA/cm² was achieved for ethylene
• System efficiency (SE=20% @ 10 mm cathode – anode distance) (electrical energy to chemical energy)
• The full knowledge including deposition of catalyst, experimental setup and the operating
condition transferred to the partners
Results
Faradic Efficiency over time Material
4nm
Unrestricted © Siemens AG 2018
April 17, 2018 CO2-Plus Status-Conference, BerlinPage 7 Corporate Technology
As
Pre
pa
red
5 m
in O
2-P
las
ma
1 m
in O
2-P
las
ma
Before EC After EC
2 µm 2 µm
• Dendritic structure is maintained upon oxygen Plasma
treatments
• Dendrites remain stable during electrochemistry even
at high potentials (U = -1.3V vs. RHE)
• Longer time treated samples preferentially form CuO
agglomerates at the dendrite sharp ends
• Electrochemical reduction of CuO to Cu lead to the
recovery of sharper dendrite structures
• Significant increase in the dendrite roughness after
CO2 electroreduction for the 5 min pre-oxidized
samples
SEM: Plasma-oxidized Cu Dendrites on Ag
Unrestricted © Siemens AG 2018
April 17, 2018 CO2-Plus Status-Conference, BerlinPage 8 Corporate Technology
CO CH4C2+C3
• Increased selectivity towards C2 and C3 products with increasing O2-plasma treatment time (up to 5 minutes),
especially ethanol and ethylene.
• Increased selectivity towards CO at low potentials due to roughening of the Ag substrate.
• Suppression of undesired C1 products (methane) upon plasma pre-oxidation
SEM: Plasma-oxidized Cu Dendrites on Ag
Unrestricted © Siemens AG 2018
April 17, 2018 CO2-Plus Status-Conference, BerlinPage 9 Corporate Technology
EXAFS AnalysisXPS Analysis
• XPS measurements performed in a UHV system
attached to an electrochemical cell without air exposure
of the samples.
• No oxides present on the sample surface after CO2RR
• Absence of the oxides in the bulk of the sample during the
reaction at -1.1 V for 1.5 h (red curve).
• Cu-Cu coordination numbers (CN) start low (CN = 6-7) due
to initial sample oxidation but converge towards 12 (bulk Cu)
after CO2RR.
Pre-oxidation by O2-Plasma increases the catalysts performance towards the desired products.
Improved behavior is rather linked to the morphological structure than the oxidation state.
Spectroscopic Characterization → Catalyst degradation
Unrestricted © Siemens AG 2018
April 17, 2018 CO2-Plus Status-Conference, BerlinPage 10 Corporate Technology
onlineGC
exhaustCatholyte
Anolyte
CO2
Autosampler
liquidGC
HPLC
Flow-Cell
: anolyte-flow
: catholyte-flow
: CO2-flow
CO2RR testing SetupExperimental setup completed, with flow cell, gas & liquid analytics
Unrestricted © Siemens AG 2018
April 17, 2018 CO2-Plus Status-Conference, BerlinPage 11 Corporate Technology
Catalytic Testing (ABMC3 from Evonik - first sample with C2H4 yield)(results reproducible within the consortium)
Testing procedure:
A) Selectivity-Screening
1. 2h - 50 mA/cm2
2h - 100 mA/cm2
2h - 200 mA/cm2
2h - 300 mA/cm2
2. repetition of 1.
B) Stability-test
4h – 250 mA/cm2
PEIS
4x Repetition
2 4 6 9 11 13 158
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
E /
Vce
ll
time / h
0
5
10
50
60
70
80
90
100
FE
/ %
1. 2.
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 228
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
E /
VC
ell
time / h
0
5
10
50
60
70
80
90
100
FE /
%
B)
A)
Unrestricted © Siemens AG 2018
April 17, 2018 CO2-Plus Status-Conference, BerlinPage 12 Corporate Technology
The picture can be added by clicking on the symbol Images of a homogeneous mixed-metal thin-film
wafer produced by cosputtering in a PVD process
as used for electrochemical characterization:
a)photograph,
b)XRF phase composition
c) XRF atomic composition Cu:Ir 70:30 (variation in
overall composition: ~0.2%, the sample is overall
homogeneous within this variation)
a) b)
c) b)
Catalyst Deposition:
Growth of mixed-metal samples in a PVD process (cosputtering)
Unrestricted © Siemens AG 2018
April 17, 2018 CO2-Plus Status-Conference, BerlinPage 13 Corporate Technology
Chronoamperometric step measurements
• Ethylene gas formation observed at potentials as low as
-1.6 V vs. Ag/AgCl
• Voltage very similar to in-situ grown catalyst with high current density (170 mA/cm²)
Cyclic voltammetry
• Proves the observed trend
Pure Cu:
Electrochemical gaseous product formation in CO2 saturated 0.1 M KHCO3
Unrestricted © Siemens AG 2018
April 17, 2018 CO2-Plus Status-Conference, BerlinPage 14 Corporate Technology
Chronoamperometric step measurements
• Hydrogen gas evolution detected at
potentials of -0.7 V vs Ag/AgCl
• No hydrocarbon (methane, ethylene) gas
formation observed even at lower potentials
• Hydrogen formation is dominant over all
other investigated catalytic pathways for
Cu:Ir 70:30
Result
• The addition of iridium is detrimental for the
reaction under the observed conditions,
because the onset for hydrogen evolution
reaction (HER) is more positive than for pure
copper
Cu-Ir (70:30 alloy): Electrochemical gaseous product formation in CO2
saturated 0.1 M KHCO3
Unrestricted © Siemens AG 2018
April 17, 2018 CO2-Plus Status-Conference, BerlinPage 15 Corporate Technology
Strategies of catalyst preparation
Cu-Coated Raney-Ni-Catalyst Mixed Metal Oxide - Catalyst
(MMO)
Cu-based Catalyst
Raney-Ni-Powder
Copper coated
Preparation of
GDL
GDL in Cu-Bath
Milled Cu-Powder
Electrolytic Cu-Powder
with dendritic surface
Copper Foam
Cu/CuO/C Catalyst
Drying furnace
Cu/CuO/C Catalyst
Spraydryer
Phases in the cpray drying of a catalyst suspension
Unrestricted © Siemens AG 2018
April 17, 2018 CO2-Plus Status-Conference, BerlinPage 16 Corporate Technology
Upscaling of MMO-Catalyst Production
Planung Ende 2017
Umsetzung Anfang 2018
Erste Versuche in Q2/2018
Ofeneingang:
Installation von Einhausung mit Absaugung zur
Befüllung von Kalzinationsschalten
Ofenausgang:
Installation von Einhausung mit Absaugung zum
Entleeren von Kalzinationsschalten.
Absaugung erfolgt über Absaugeinrichtung mit
Abscheidung direkt in Transportgefäß
Kalzinationsschale:
Kalzinationsschale wird mit Katalysatorpulver gefüllt;
Schütthöhe wird mit Rackel reguliert;
Kalzinationsschale mit permeabler Abdeckung
Unrestricted © Siemens AG 2018
April 17, 2018 CO2-Plus Status-Conference, BerlinPage 17 Corporate Technology
Key component:
Gas Diffusion Electrode (GDE) to overcome the low solubility of CO2 in water
• Only CO2 can be electrochemically reduced not HCO3- or
other chemically dissolved species
• 3-Phase interface ensures high CO2 concentration at the
electrode (gas-liquid-solid)
Key challenge to achieve industrial
relevant current densities
>> 100 mA/cm²
• CO2 is absorbed on the electro catalytic electrode
• Gas separation may be needed in subsequent processes
CO2
(l)(g)
CO2
(g)(s)
(l)
Ion Exchange membrane
CO2
dispersion
Unrestricted © Siemens AG 2018
April 17, 2018 CO2-Plus Status-Conference, BerlinPage 18 Corporate Technology
GDE production
Scale-up to 300cm² (MMO / Copper oxide based GDEs)
Calandaring in full with 130mmVacuum table/ mounting
Results
Percent flow/Diameter
0102030405060708090
100
0,7
2
0,7
5
0,7
8
0,8
2
0,8
6
0,9
1
0,9
7
1,0
1
1,0
8
1,1
5
1,2
4
1,3
4
1,4
6
1,6
1
1,7
5
1,9
3
2,2
2
2,5
3
2,8
5
3,2
4
4,5
5,7
4
7,9
8
14
,5
84
,4
Diameter (um)
Percen
t f
low
Pore size flow distribution [CDIF] Cumulative filter flow [SUM]
Pore size distribution
Activation 200mA/cm²
• GDE with very high porosity was prepared
• Sharp pore size distribution was achieved
• 250 mbar wetting pressure
• 100 mbar bubble point pressure
•3 Ohm resistance
• Machine sieving
• Better homogeneity of powder layer
• Faster application
•Calendaring
• Homogeneous pressure over the complete roll with
Unrestricted © Siemens AG 2018
April 17, 2018 CO2-Plus Status-Conference, BerlinPage 19 Corporate Technology
Influence of copper oxide species
Characterization of Copper/ Copper-(I)-Oxides
•The presence of Cu beside Cu2O could slightly increase the faradaic efficiency
• all catalysts form CO, beside hydrogen and ethylene
6% Cu2O-94%Cu
0 50 100 150 200 2500
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
H2
CO
CH4
C2H
4
FE
/ %
J/ mA*cm-2
0 50 100 150 200 2500
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
H2
CO
CH4
C2H
4
FE
/ %
J/ mA*cm-2
Cu2O@Cu
Results
Cu2O was prepared precipitation
Pourbaix diagram (T=25°C, c(Cu) 1x10-5 mol/l)
•Cu2O phase is stable between pH=6 to pH=14
•the local pH value in the laminar boundary much more basic than
the bulk electrolyte
•formation of Cu2+ azurite, malachite, tenorid, must be avoided
Stability of Cu2O is limited to a very small process window!
Cu2O@Cu was prepared by
thermal oxidation according to
phase diagram
Cu2+ Cu2(OH)2CO3CuO
Cu2O
Cu
Unrestricted © Siemens AG 2018
April 17, 2018 CO2-Plus Status-Conference, BerlinPage 20 Corporate Technology
Comparison of Pure Copper and Pure Copper-(I)-oxide
C2H4-FE over WE-Potential
Results
• Cu and Cu2O showed comparable results in the reduction experiment
Cu 99.999
Cu 99.99
Cu 99.999
Cu 99.99
Current density over WE-Potential
Unrestricted © Siemens AG 2018
April 17, 2018 CO2-Plus Status-Conference, BerlinPage 21 Corporate Technology
Catalyst Exchange History
Sample Number Evonik Catalyst test date
FE(Ethylen) @
250mA/cm²1 AMC170050 16.02.2017 10
2 AMC170009 16.02.2017 0
3 AMC170012 16.02.2017 0
4 AMC170013 16.02.2017 0
5 AMC170014 16.02.2017 0
6 CPC SP 1700 16.02.2017 0
7 MC 315 21.02.2017 0
8 Kupferschaum 21.02.2017 4
9 Cu-Polyurethangewebe 21.02.2017 7
10 CSAZ00639 24.04.2017 2
11 CSAZ00640 24.04.2017 14
12 AMC170047 25.04.2017 0
13 AMC170048 25.04.2017 0
14 AMC170073 07.06.2017 0
15 AMC170050 07.06.2017 0
16 AMC170056 07.06.2017 0
17 ABMC3 07.06.2017 12
18 CSAZ00660 08.06.2017 12
19 CSAZ00661 12.06.2017 13
20 CSAZ00662 12.06.2017 3
21 CSAZ00684 23.08.2017 22
22 CSAZ00715 21.11.2017 25
23 CSAZ00716 21.11.2017 22
24 CSAZ00717 21.11.2017 15
25 CSAZ00718 30.11.2017 0
26 CSAZ00734 14.03.2018 12
27 CSAZ00733 14.03.2018 7
Exchanged Samples
• 27 different catalyst powder received from Evonik
• 120 Gasdiffusion electrodes prepared
• 37 electrodes pre-tested on 3cm² scale
• 10 electrodes tested on 10cm² scale in flow cell (longtime)
• 5 electrodes prepared on 300cm² scale (copper based)
•two suitable catalyst powders identified (mixed metal oxide)
•25% Faraday efficiency for ethylene at 250mA/cm² achieved
•GDE preparation up scaled to 300cm²
GDE could handle current densities J>300mA/cm²
High mechanical stability, high porosity
Highlights
sampleexchange
results
Unrestricted © Siemens AG 2018
April 17, 2018 CO2-Plus Status-Conference, BerlinPage 22 Corporate Technology
Conclusion Project eEthylene FKZ 033RC004A
• Ethylene could be reproducibly obtained at high current densities by all partners with
an in-situ deposited nano dentride copper catalyst
• Catalyst stability is still the major challenge of the whole project (we may move to other oxides)
• Electro catalysts differ significantly from classical thermochemicals catalyst with respect to
composition, purity & morphology
• Copper oxide gives excellent ethylene selectivity, but could be hardly stabilized under
electrochemical reduction conditions
• Transfer to gas diffusion electrodes and their implementation successful
Thanks also to the team of eEthyene
Prof. Dr. B.Roldan, F. Scholten, Prof. P. Strasser, T. Möller, Prof. K. Mayrhofer, I. Katsounaros,
R. Poss, C. Reller, S. Romero-Cuellar, A. Maltenberger, D. Taroata and all the invisible technicians in the back
Thanks Dr. Stefanie Roth for coordination