project document - deliverable description€¦ · web view2019. 5. 25. · this readjustment of...
TRANSCRIPT
United Nations Development Programme
Project title:
ELABORATION OF THE THIRD NATIONAL COMMUNICATION AND FIRST BIENNIAL REPORT OF ALGERIA TO THE UNFCCC
Country:
ALGERIA
Implementing Partner
Ministry of Environment and Renewable Energy
Management Arrangements :
National Implementation Modality (NIM) /full NIM support
UNDAF Outcome: By 2020, citizens’ livelihoods and resilience have improved through sustainable and participatory management of natural and urban ecosystems.
UNDP Strategic Plan Output: 2.1.1 Low emission and climate resilient objectives addressed in national, sub-national and sectoral development plans and policies to promote economic diversification and green growth
CPD Output: Output 2.1 The capacities of key national and local actors are strengthened to implement strategies/plans for sustainable management of natural and urban ecosystems focused on improving citizens’ resilience and living conditions
UNDP Social and Environmental Screening Category: Exempt
UNDP Gender Marker: 1
Atlas Project ID/Award ID number: 00111680 Atlas Output ID/Project ID number: 00110577
UNDP-GEF PIMS ID number: 5267 GEF ID number:10045
Planned start date: January 2019 Planned end date: December 2022
LPAC date: 7 Nov 2018
Brief project description: The purpose of this project is to prepare the Third National Communication (TNC) and First Biennial Update Report (BUR1 1) to the UNFCCC. It aims to strengthen information
Page | 1
database of the national context, analytical and technical capacity of the key national institutions to integrate climate change priorities into national development strategies and relevant sectorial policies. The process of preparation of the TNC and BUR1 1 will continue the ongoing dialogue, information exchange and partnership among relevant stakeholders, including government, civil society, academia, private sector, and women.
In order to fulfill its obligations to the UNFCCC in terms of submission of national communications and biennial update reports, support from the Global Environment Facility (GEF) is needed to continue to develop and consolidate the existing technical and institutional capacity and to continue the efforts of integrating climate change into national plans, policies and programs.
Building on the previously prepared Initial National Communication (INC) and Second National communication (SNC) as well as the lessons learned throughout, Algeria is planning to submit its first Biennial Update Report in December 2020 and the Third National Communication (TNC) in December 2022 to the UNFCCC Secretariat.
FINANCING PLAN
GEF Trust Fund USD 852,000
UNDP USD 80,000
(1) Total Budget administered by UNDP USD 932,000
(2) Government (cash, not administered by UNDP)
USD 900,000
PARALLEL CO-FINANCING (all other co-financing that is not cash co-financing administered by UNDP)
Government in kind… USD 1,500,000
(3) Total co-financing USD 1500,000
(4) Grand-Total Project Financing (1)+(2)+(3)
USD 3,332,000
SIGNATURES
Name and Signature: Agreed by Government
Date/Month/Year:
Name and Signature: Agreed by Implementing Partner
Date/Month/Year:
Name and Signature: Agreed by Date/Month/Year:
Page | 2
UNDP
Page | 3
Table of ContentsI. List of acronyms and abbreviations...................................................................................................6II. Development Challenge..................................................................................................................11
1 Situation analysis...........................................................................................................................111.1. UNDP.....................................................................................................................................111.2. INDCs/NDCs...........................................................................................................................121.3. PNC........................................................................................................................................121.4. Sustainable development......................................................................................................131.5. Institutional Arrangements....................................................................................................131.6. Energy sector.........................................................................................................................151.7. Waste sector..........................................................................................................................211.8. Local initiatives......................................................................................................................211.9. Territory vulnerability............................................................................................................221.10. Scientific Research and Atmospheric Observations...........................................................241.11. Women’s involvement in the process................................................................................251.12. Civil society and associative movement participation........................................................25
III. Strategy...........................................................................................................................................271 Objectives, strategy and results.....................................................................................................27
1.1. Project objectives..................................................................................................................271.2. Project strategy......................................................................................................................29
IV. RESULTS AND PARTNERSHIPS.........................................................................................................33Objectives and results...............................................................................................................................33Stakeholder engagement plan..................................................................................................................40Gender equality and empowering women:..............................................................................................41South-South and Triangular Cooperation (SSTrC):....................................................................................43Sustainability and Scaling Up:...................................................................................................................43V. Project Results Framework:............................................................................................................44FINANCIAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, TOTAL BUDGET AND WORK PLAN......................................51VI. Governance and Management Arrangements................................................................................58VII. Monitoring Framework and Evaluation..........................................................................................69VIII. Legal Context..................................................................................................................................74IX. Risk Management...........................................................................................................................74X. Mandatory annexes........................................................................................................................77
Annex A. Working plan and deliverables schedule................................................................................78A1. Multi Year Work Plan.............................................................................................................78A2. Schedule of BUR1 and TNC deliverables and submission to UNFCCC....................................84A3. Technical components of the project proposal......................................................................85
Annex B. Terms of Reference for Project Staff......................................................................................87B1. Terms of reference of the National Coordinator of TNC and BUR1 Project...........................87
Page | 4
B2. Terms of reference of the administrative and financial assistant..........................................89Annex C. UNDP Social and Environmental and Social Screening (SESP) - Exempt.................................91Annex D. UNDP Project Quality Assurance Report................................................................................92Annex E. UNDP Risk Log.........................................................................................................................93Annex F. Results of the capacity assessment of the project implementing partner and HACT micro assessment..................................................................................................................................97Annex G. Standard letter of agreement between UNDP and the government for the provision of support services....................................................................................................................................98Annex H. Final report of [country’s name] national communication’s / biennial update report’s project.............................................................................................................................................................102Annex I. GEF Operational Focal Point’s Endorsement Letter...............................................................110
Page | 5
I. LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
AERONET Aerosol Robotic Network ANCC: National agency of climate change (Agence nationale des changements
climatiques)AND: National agency of waste (Agence nationale des déchets)ANRH: National agency of hydraulic resources (Agence nationale des ressources
hydrologiques)APN National People's Assembly (Assemble populaire nationale) APRUE: National agency of rational use of energy (Agence nationale de la promotion et la
rationalisation de l’utilisation de l’énergie)ARCE Association for Research on Climate and Environment (Association pour la
Recherche sur le Climat et l’Environnement)ASAL : Algerian space agency (Agence spatiale algérienne)BAU : Business as usualBUR : Biennial update report (rapport biennal actualisé (RBU)CDER: Center of development of renewable energy (Centre de développement des
énergies renouvelables)CdP/COP: Conference of parties (Conférence des parties)CDP: Project Steering Committee (Comité directeur de projet)CERIST: Center for Research on Scientific and Technical Information (Centre de recherche
sur l'information scientifique et technique)CN : Council of the Nation (Conseil de la nation)CNC: National Climate Committee (Comité national climat)CNDRB: National Center for the Development of Biological Resources (Centre National de
développement des ressources biologiques) CNES : National economic and social Council (Conseil national économique et social)CNFE : National Conservatory of Training to Environmental (Conservatoire National des
Formations à l'Environnement)CNI: Initial National Communication (Communication nationale initiale)CNL: National Commissariat of the Littoral (Commissariat national du littoral) CNP: National Project Coordinator (Coordonnateur national du projet)CNTPP : National Center of Cleaner Production Technology (Centre national des
technologies de production plus propre) COT Technical Operational commitee (Comité opérationnel technique) CPD Country Programme Document (Document de programme de pays)CREG: Commission for the regulation of electricity and gas (Commission de régulation de
l’électricité et du gaz)
Page | 6
CRSTRA : Center for Scientific and Technical Research on Arid Regions (Centre de recherche scientifique et technique sur les régions arides)
DCC : Directorate of Climate Change (Direction des changements climatiques) DGF : General Directorate of Forests (Direction générale des forêts) DNP : National Project Director (Directeur National du Projet) DPC Direct Project CostsGEF: Global environment fundFNER : National Fund for Renewable Energies and Cogeneration (Fonds national pour les
énergies renouvelables et la cogénération) FNME : National Fund of Energy Control (Fonds national pour la maîtrise de l’énergie
GHG: Greenhouse gases INRAA: National Institute of Agronomic Research of Algeria (Institut national de la
recherche agronomique d’Algérie)IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) GIZ Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (Agence de coopération
allemande)INDC Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (CPDN)INRF: National Institute of Forest Research (Institut national de recherche forestière)IPPU Industrial processes and product use (procédés industriels et usages des produits)IR: Inception reportMADRP Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Fisheries (Ministère de
l’Agriculture, du Développement Rural et de la Pêche)MAE: Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Ministère des affaires étrangères)MoE: Ministry of energy (Ministère de l’énergie)MEN Ministry of national education (Ministère de l’éducation nationale)MESRS: Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research (Ministère de l’enseignement
supérieur et de la recherche scientifique)MICLAT: Ministry of the Interior and Local populations (Ministère de l’intérieur et des
collectivités locales)MIM: Ministry of Industry and Mining (Ministère de l’industrie et des mines)MRE: Ministry of water ressources (Ministère des ressources en eau)MEER: Ministry of Environment and Renewable Energy (Ministère de l’environnement et
des énergies renouvelables)MRV Measurement, reporting and verificationNAMA : Nationally appropriate mitigation actions (actions nationales appropriées
d’atténuation)NDC Nationally determined contributions
Page | 7
NC National communication NEX: National executionNFP National Focal point NIR National inventory report ONA: National Agency of sewage (Office national de l’assainissement) ONEDD: National Observatory of Environment and Sustainable Development (Observatoire
national de l’environnement et du développement durable) NGO Non-governmental organization ONM National Meteorological Office (Office national de la météorologie)ONS National Office of statistics (Office national des statistiques) PAED Action plans for sustainable energy (Plans d'action en faveur de l'énergie durable)PAEDC Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plans (Plan d’action en faveur de l’énergie
durable et du climat PANLCD National Action Plan to Combat Desertification (Plan d’action national de lutte
contre la désertification) PFN National Focal Point (Point focal national)PME Small and medium-sized enterprise (Petite et moyenne entreprise)PMI Small and medium-sized industry (Petite et moyenne industrie)PNAE-DD National Action Plan for the Environment and Sustainable Development (Plan
national d’actions pour l’environnement et le développement durable)PNAGDES National Plan of special Waste Management (Plan National de Gestion des
Déchets Spéciaux) PNC National Climate Plan (Plan National Climat)PNEE National Plan of Energy Efficiency (Plan national de l’efficacité énergétique)PNER National Plan of Renewable Energy (Plan national des énergies renouvelables)PNME National Program of Energy Control (Programme national de maîtrise de l’énergie)PNR: National Research Program (Programme national de recherche scientifique)PNR : National plan of reforestation (Plan National de reboisements) PNUAD United Nations Development Assistance Framework (UNDAF) (Plan-cadre des
nations unies pour l’aide au développement)QA/QC: Quality assurance/quality control (Assurance qualité/contrôle qualité)
UNDP United Nations Development ProgramPPRI Flood Prevention Plans (Plans de Prévention des Risques d’Inondation) PRODEC Program of Waste Management and Circular Economy (Programme de gestion des
déchets et économie circulaire) PROGDEM National Program of Municipal Waste Management (Programme national de
gestion des déchets municipaux)
Page | 8
RCM Regional Climate Models (Modèles climatiques régionaux) R&D Research & development (Recherche et développement) SAU Agricultural area of use (Surface agricole utile)SBAA Standard basic assistance agreementSCN Second national communication SNAT National Scheme of Territory Planning (Schéma National d’Aménagement du
Territoire) SNEDD National Strategy for Environment and Sustainable Development (Stratégie
nationale de l'Environnement et du Développement Durable) TA Technical assistanceTNC: Third national communication (Troisième communication nationale) ToR: Terms of reference UGP Project Management Unit (unité de gestion du projet) UNDP United Nations Development ProgramUNFCCC United Nations Framework Convention on Climate ChangeUSD United States Dollars V&A: Vulnerability & adaptation WEAP Water evaluation and planning systemMW Mega Watt
Page | 9
II. DEVELOPMENT CHALLENGE
1 Situation analysis
Algeria signed the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) in June 1992 and ratified it in June 1993 as recognition to the importance of climate change and its commitment to the process. Algeria ratified the Kyoto Protocol in February 2005, as well as the Paris Climate Agreement on 13 October 2016.
Algeria fulfilled its obligations arising from Article 12 of the UNFCCC by submitting two National Communications, the first in 2001 and the second in 2010. It also actively participated in international climate change negotiations, including not only chairmanship of regional groups such as the Africa Group and the G77 + China, but also participation in statutory bodies to the Convention (e.g. Ad Hoc Working Group on the Durban Platform for Enhanced Action, Consultative Group of Experts on National Communications).
National experts contribute to various UNFCCC Secretariat processes, such as those for the review of Annex I National Reports, International Consultation and Analysis of Biennial Update Reports (BUR) for non-Annex Parties. Algerian experts are also contributing to the work of the IPCC.
1.1. UNDP
UNDP provides expertise, policy advice and capacity-building to to support the realization of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). UNDP also supports the development and implementation of national policies and strategies for sustainable development, in close cooperation with national institutions, local populations and civil society. UNDP’s Country Programme for 2016-2020 is aligned with, and supports the implementation of, the Strategic Cooperation Framework for 2016-2020 approved by the United Nations System in Algeria and the Government of Algeria in June 2015.
The Country Programme is structured according to two interrelated pillars:
- Support for non-hydrocarbon and environmentally sustainable strategies that generate income and create jobs, including for women and young people;
- Development of the capacity of stakeholders, to promote local development and access to quality public services.
With regards to sustainable development and environment, UNDP support has contributed to the development of the National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan 2016-2030, the National Development Strategy for the Fisheries and Aquaculture Sector, the implementation of integrated management plans for protected areas, formulation and application of waste collection and management plans for local authorities, and the integration of the environment into education both in the national school system and in professional training, among others. UNDP in Algeria also supports the implementation of key international agreements in Algeria, including the Convention on Biological Diversity and the UNFCCC. As such, UNDP supported the implementation of the first two national communications on climate change as the executing agency for GEF-funded enabling activities and will support the Government of Algeria to
Page | 10
prepare its third national communication (TNC) and its first updated biennial report (BUR) to the UNFCCC.
1.2. Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDC)
In September 2015, Algeria submitted its Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDC) to the UNFCCC Secretariat. By 2030, it envisages a voluntary reduction of national Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions by 7% based on the Business as Usual (BAU) scenario, and a reduction of up to to 22% with the provision of international technical and financial assistance.
Mitigation strategy of Algeria mainly covers energy, forestry, housing, transport, industry and waste sectors. It focuses on the national renewable energy and energy efficiency programs, which reflect its determination to continue its efforts to combat the negative effects of climate change. The reduction of energy consumption in the building is part of the voluntary reduction measures of greenhouse gas emissions by Algeria in the said determined national contribution (NDCs).
These programs will be continued and strengthened so that Algeria can benefit from international support in terms of new and external financial resources, transfer of technology and know-how.
1.3. National Climate Plan (PNC)
The National Climate Plan (PNC) process was initiated in 2012 with support from the German Development Agency (GIZ). The PNC covers the major challenges faced by Algeria in terms of the negative effects of climate change. It aims to harmonize the programmes and actions of the various sectors with national economic and social development plans and to define processes to implement identified priority activities. The revision of the PNC was launched in 2017, and the adoption of this revised version happened in July 2018. The revision of the PNC was motivated by the need to take into account changes brought forward by the new national social and economic development strategy, as well Algeria’s INDC in the context of Algeria’s ratification of the Paris Agreement.
Furthermore, several studies are currently being carried out on on the vulnerability and adaptation of Algeria to climate change’s negative effects, among which two studies on the spatial mapping of vulnerability , and on coastal vulnerability, and initation of a project to develop a national adaptation plan.
1.4. Sustainable development
A new phase of the National Action Plan for Environment and Sustainable Development (PNAEDD) was launched in partnership with GIZ. The update of the PNAEDD, planned for the period 2012-2021, aims to set up a new strategic framework for the country's environmental policy, in view of considerably reducing the rhythm of environmental degradation.
Moreover, the fight against climate change has been integrated in the new Environment and Sustainable Development Strategy (SNDD) 2017-2035, which acts as the backbone tothe new Economic Growth Recovery Program towards 2035, which in turns aims todiversify the national economy while integrating challenges and constraints caused by climate change.
Page | 11
1.5. Institutional Arrangements
Algeria has established institutional arrangements aligned with its obligations arising from the UNFCCC and the Paris Agreement. These arrangements were also established as a means to mainstream climate change as a key component in national environmental policy.
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs acts as national focal point to the Framework Convention. The role is carried out by the Department of Multilateral Relations, which is mandated by law to represent Algeria in international fora. The attribution of this role to the Department ensures better intersectoral coordination and government-wide support for negotiations under UNFCCC.
The National Agency for Climate Change (ANCC), created by executive decree in September 2005 and operational since 2007, has set up a scientific council, whose members are appointed by ministerial decree. The agency is responsible for considering all aspects related to climate change, by integrating climate change into development plans and mandating studies on vulnerability, adaptation, and mitigation. It is also responsible for the national inventory of GHG emissions.
The National Climate Committee (CNC), created in 2015 and chaired by the Minister of Environment, brings together high-level representatives from different sectors. It is established by decision of the Prime Minister following the meeting of the inter-ministerial Council of 7 July 2015 and ensures coordination, monitoring and evaluation of national climate change policies, strategies, programs and action plans. It proposes the necessary measures to ensure the implementation of Algeria’s commitments internationally and/or the decisions to be taken accordingly by the government on climate change issues. The CNC is also responsible for validating all documents and reports relating to climate change and that must be submitted, among others, to the UNFCCC Secretariat.
Institutional strengthening continued in 2015 with the creation of the Climate Change Directorate in the new organizational chart of the Ministry of Environment and Renewable Energy. This Directorate is responsible for overseeing the development, coordination and implementation of national strategies and action plans on climate change. It encompasses two sub-directorates responsible respectively for mitigation and for adaptation to the negative impacts of climate change.
The other relevant ministries/departments involved in the implementation of measures to address climate change have established focal points, who serve as sectoral spokespersons. The mandate of focal points is to develop and communicate their sector’s views on environmental policy and their key priorities and interests to be reflected in Algeria’s stance during UNFCCC negotiation processes.
The Government s also has plans to establish an Energy Efficiency and Innovation Agency that would be responsible for the overall oversight of programmes related to energy savings and energy efficiency and managing related grants and support programmes.
Page | 12
1.6. Energy sector
The energy sector has implemented several measures aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions such as well installations of gas compression and reinjection in sinks, 32 gas flare recovery projects in the oil and gas fields. The legislative and regulatory device has allowed reducing gas flaring by 42% over a 15-year period from 6.19 billion m3 in 2000 to 3.5 billion in 2015. The project of sequestration and storage of CO2 (CCS) at the Kréchba (In Salah) deposit allowed the storage of about 4 million tons of CO2 between 2004-2011.
In the field of transport, several initiatives have been launched to promote and develop sustainable mobility: by the realization of Tramways in several cities (Algiers, Constantine, Oran, Ouargla, Sidi Bel Abbès and Setif), the launching of works in six other major cities, the Algiers Metro – with extensions to cover suburbs East and West of the City -, as well as of the railway network. These measures aim to reduce GHG emissions attributable to the transport sector, which account for 24% of overall national GHG emissions.
- New energy pricing
The Electricity and Gas Regulatory Commission (CREG) has published the new tariffs applicable from 1 January 2016. This readjustment of energy tariffs applies to both electricity and natural gas distributed by pipeline. This measure aims, on the one hand, to control energy consumption while maintaining households’ purchase power, and on the other hand, to encourage large consumers (industrial and private) to introduce energy efficiency measures, for instance through less energy-intensive processes. Furthermore, the 2016 Finance Law introduced a new pricing for different fuels, increasing price by approximately also 37%.
- Updating the National Programme on Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency
Algeria has integrated the development of renewable energy and energy efficiency into its new energy policy by adopting an enabling legislative and regulatory framework . This framework incentivizes investment in renewable energy through the development of a national industry for the production of renewable energy equipment.
The relevant legislative texts adopted are chronologically classified as follows:
Executive Decree No. 17-98 of 26 February 2017 defining the request for proposal for the production of renewable energies or cogeneration and their integration into the national electricity supply system.
Executive Decree No. 16-121 of 6 April 2016 amending and supplementing Executive Decree No. 15-319 of 13 December 2015 laying down the operating procedures for Special assignment account No. 302-131 entitled "National Fund for Mastery Energy and renewable energies and cogeneration”.
Executive Decree No. 16-52 of 1 February 2016 laying down the technical rules of the production of electricity,
Draft inter-ministerial decree 2016 modifying and supplementing the inter-ministerial decree 28 October 2012 determining the nomenclature of the revenue and expenditure
Page | 13
chargeable to the special assignment account No. 302-131 entitled "National Fund for Energy Management and for renewable energies and cogeneration.
Draft inter-ministerial decree 2016 modifying and supplementing the inter-ministerial decree of 28 October 2012 specifying the modalities for the monitoring and evaluation of the special assignment account No. 302-131 entitled "National Fund for Energy Management and for renewable energies and cogeneration.
Law No. 15-18 of December 30, 2015 on the Finance law for 2016. "Art. 108. Operations of special assignment account No. 302-101 will be entitled "National Fund for Energy Saving and Renewable Energies and Cogeneration".
Decision D / 22-15 / CD of 29 December 2015 setting electricity and gas tariffs.
Executive Decree No. 15-319 of 13 December 2015 laying down the detailed rules for the operation of special assignment account No. 302-131 entitled "National Fund for Energy Saving and Renewable Energies and Cogeneration".
Inter-ministerial decree of 29 November 2015 amending and supplementing the inter-ministerial decree of 20 October 2013 specifying the modalities for the monitoring and evaluation of the special assignment account No. 302-137 entitled "National Investment Support Fund for Electrification and public distribution of gas".
Executive Decree 15-69 of 11 February 2015 laying down the procedures for the certification of the origin of renewable energy and the usage of these certificates.
Executive Decree No. 15-09 of 14 January 2015 laying down the procedures for approving hydrocarbon-specific hazard studies and their content.
Law No. 14-10 of 30 December 2014 on the Finance Law for 2015, in particular Article 108, which provides for the merger of the two Special Funds: the "National Energy Control Fund (FNME)" and the "Fund of Renewable Energy and Combined Heat and Power (FNER).
Order of 1 September 2014, supplemented by the Decree of 7 December 2016, fixing the guaranteed purchase prices and the conditions for their application for electricity produced from installations using the cogeneration spinneret.
Inter-ministerial decree of 2 June 2014 fixing the quotas of motor vehicles running on LPG/C to be included by car dealers in the import of vehicles and the manner of its application.
Decree of 2 February 2014, supplemented by the Decree of 7 December 2016, setting the guaranteed purchase prices and the conditions for their application for electricity produced from installations using wind power,
Order of 2 February 2014, supplemented by the Decree of 22 November 2016, setting the guaranteed purchase prices and the conditions for their application for electricity produced from installations using photovoltaic solar power,
Page | 14
Executive Decree No. 13-424 of 18 December 2013 amending and supplementing Executive Decree No. 05-495 of 26 December 2005 on the energy audit of energy-intensive companies,
Executive Decree No. 13-218 of 18 June 2013 laying down the conditions for the granting of premiums for the costs of diversifying electricity production,
Inter-ministerial decree of 28 October 2012 determining the nomenclature of revenue and expenditure chargeable to the special account No. 302-131 entitled "National Fund for Renewable Energies and Cogeneration".
Law 05-07 of 28 April 2005 on hydrocarbons was amended by the Finance law of 2016 where the specific flaring tax payable to the public treasury increased from 8,000 to 20,000 DA per thousand cubic nanometres (Nm3) of flared gas in favour of the incentive to reduce the gases flared as well as the allocation to the benefit of the national fund for Renewable Energies and cogeneration of 55% of the proceeds of this tax. This tax was doubled in 2016 to further reduce flared gases.
This legislative framework demonstrates Algeria’s commitment to achieve transition to more sustainable energy sector, and to enable large-scale production of renewable energy.. An updated program was adopted at the Council of Ministers on 24 May 2015 in view of increasing, by 2020, the production capacity of renewable energy by more than 4500 MW . The new national programme focuses on the development of photovoltaic and wind power, the introduction of biomass (waste recovery), cogeneration and geothermal energy. The programme also introduces energy efficiency measures in the building, transport and industrial sectors, through promoting the creation of a local manufacturing industry for high-performance lamps, solar water heaters, and thermal insulation.
In addition, several new renewable energy pilot projects are being carried out, including: the solar photovoltaic multi-technology plant in Ghardaia, with a production capacity of of 1.1 MW, the wind power plant in Adrar, with a capacity of 10 MW. The construction of 22 additional solar photovoltaic plants is also planned, with an overall capacity of 353 MW.
In the framework of Algeria-European cooperation, Algeria benefited from a European Union support programme, under implementation since 2017, for the development of renewable energy and the promotion of energy efficiency measures. This programme contains three main intervention areas: the first devoted to institutional, policy and regulatory aspects; the second devoted to renewable energy; and the third to energy efficiency. The programme was developed in response to Algeria’s expressed commitment to developing renewable energy and promoting energy efficient measures, allowing the country to benefit from the transfer of technical and regulatory know-how.
- Implementation of buildings thermal regulations
Page | 15
The Ministry of Habitat has progressively implemented a regulatory framework to introduce thermal insulation in the Infrastructure sector. The application of these regulations was tested on a pilot basis during the construction of 600 housing units across twelve wilayas in the country. Energy audits were carried out in these united to measure energy efficiency performance in these units, with a view to pull lessons learned and capitalize on the results in view of a wider the implementation of the regulations.
Ongoing projects for the new towns of Hassi Messaoud, Sidi Abdellah (Algiers), Bouinan (Blida), Boughezoul (Médéa) and El Menéa (Ghardaïa) include a modern architectural concept combining sustainable energy and environmental protection.
- Taxation of Energy-intensive equipment
The 2017 Finance Law introduced the taxation of energy-intensive equipment to address the overconsumption of energy by household appliances; the tax is to be applied on the basis of the level of energy consumption of the appliance, determined through the existing national labelling programme.. This measure forms a part of the national policy to promote energy efficiency and constitutes a first step leading eventually to fixing a minimum threshold for the energy performance of equipment put on the Algerian market.
1.7. Waste sector
Waste management and treatment is an important component in the fight against climate change, through national waste programs (PROGDEM and NAWMP) to ensure the management, prevention, recycling and valorisation of waste.
The second phase of the national program for the management of municipal waste "PROGDEM" aims to develop a national strategy for the valorisation of waste and the creation of "green" jobs considered as a means of fighting unemployment. The bilateral cooperation between Algeria and Germany, the program "Waste Management and Circular Economy (PRODEC)" was launched in November 2014 for a period of four years, which will provide technical support to Algeria for the realization of phase two of its national program for the management of municipal waste "PROGDEM".
The Integrated Waste Management Support Project (AGID) extending until 2019 within the framework of the Algerian-Belgian cooperation is implemented in three wilayas (Mascara, Mostaganem and Sidi Bel Abbés) and covers Integrated waste management.
The new National Integrated Waste Management Strategy for 2035 provides for the development of the sectors in the framework of the circular economy, the protection of the environment and the creation of green jobs.
1.8. Local initiatives
Local populations can play a major role in the fight against climate change, namely through integrating energy efficient measures and developing renewable energy in their respective municipalities.
The Cleaner Energy saving Mediterranean Cities regional project funded by the European Commission is being implemented in 2013 in three pilot municipalities (Batna, Sidi Bel Abbes
Page | 16
and Boumerdes). The objectives of the project are to assist local populations in the development and implementation of sustainable policies, whose Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plans (PAEDC), including the development of renewable energy, Energy efficiency measures, waste and transport management to reduce CO2 emissions.
It has permitted to contribute to sensitizing decision-makers to the need for greater involvement of cities in the implementation of the national program for renewable energy and energy efficiency. Local authorities (municipalities, daïras and/or wilayas) can play a major role in integrating energy efficiency actions and developing renewable energies in their territories, in particular solar thermal and photovoltaic. This makes it possible to achieve considerable energy savings in the municipal budgets on the one hand and to contribute to the development and consolidation of a market for energy efficiency and renewable energies on the other hand. These actions at the local level will also contribute to the actions contained in the (INDCs) of Algeria.
A new capacity building program for local development actors (“CAPDEL”), launched in 2017, is being implemented by UNDP and the Ministry of Interior and Local Populations. This project, implemented in 10 pilot communes, aims to enhance citizen participation in the planning and implementation of municipal policies for public and administrative services, and local economic development, with a view to promoting a concerted, transparent and attentive communal governance model tailored to the needs and expectations of citizens, especially young people and women.
1.9. Territory vulnerability
Algeria, located in an arid and semi-arid zone, has three distinct climatic areas: : the Sahara (arid and desert zone), the high lands (semi-arid zone) and the Tellian zone to the north (wetland with winter wet and cool and summer hot and dry).
In Algeria, precipitation is characterized by a very marked spatial and temporal variability. The decrease of rainfall from north to south is superimposed on a decrease from east to west. Annual rainfall rates range from 500 to 1150 mm in the north and as low as 100 mm in the south. Rainfall also varies from 250 to 500mm in the West and ranges from 600 to 1150 mm in the East.
The climate context of Algeria remains subject to a very significant water stress, where the high temperatures recorded as well as the drastic reduction of rain exacerbates its vulnerability. In fact, this tendency is induced by the progression of aridity and the rise of the 100 mm isohyet in the north, undermining the ecological resilience of natural ecosystems, particularly the forest formations of altitude, some of which initiate signs of decline related to the progression of the phenomenon of aridity.
Climate vulnerability is a challenge for Algeria, who implements an intersectoral approach and guides the planning of public policies to integrate climate change adaptation, combat desertification and preserve biological diversity and water resources.
Algeria faces a water resource deficit of about 1.1 billion m3, reflected in the decline in agricultural yields. The national strategy aims to mobilize and to sustainably valorise these
Page | 17
resources to meet the needs of the populations and to satisfy those of the agricultural sector. Numerous action plans have been established, where the extension of irrigated areas of one million hectares is expected.
The development of Saharan agriculture, through the creation of new development perimeters, also cognizes a sustained effort. The national action plan 2015-2019 aims at the extension of the national irrigated sole to 2 136 000 ha. The Policy of Renewal of the Agricultural and Rural Economy presents itself as a response to the problem of food security and this through the many challenges to raise, especially those related to agricultural production, the valorisation of territories and the strengthening of Policies put in place.
1.9.1. Vulnerability and adaptation of water resources
Algeria suffers the negative impacts of climate change since the 1970s which saw long periods of drought, soil erosion, desertification, and an increase in water scarcity.
The National Water Plan, adopted in 2006 and developed in accordance with the National Land Use schema (SNAT), incorporates indicators on the impact of climate change on rainfall and groundwater recharge during the period 1975-2005. It foresees the development of the water sector by 2030, including a climate change adaptation programme.
The National Agency for Hydraulic Resources (ANRH) carried out, between 2006 and 2009, a study of the impact of climate change on water resources in Algeria. This study enabled the Ministry of Water Resources to better anticipate and plan for drought situations and improve water resource management in the framework of sustainable development. The study showed that the persistent drought in Algeria since the 1970s has reduced the national potential of water resources in the northern region. The reduction in rainfall has increased from 20 to 40 per cent, respectively, in the eastern and western regions of the country. The rainfall is characterized by a significant spatial and temporal irregularity thus constituting a constant threat for the replenishment of reservoir dams and renewal of groundwater resources.
Other studies carried out in 2013 have contributed to the national strategy to combat floods caused by increasingly frequent extreme weather events, the implementation of a flood forecasting and warning system, and the development of Flood Prevention Plans (PPRIs).
A study has been carried out on the Mazafran Basin to address the climate vulnerability of the water resources sector in view of developing a long term action plan of adaptation measures. The Water Assessment and Planning System (WEAP 21) is being applied to analyse the current and projected balance (future scenarios) of water resources in accordance with different policies and operational factors that may affect demand by 2050. An integrated water resources management strategy is a key measure to meet competing long-term demands and ensure water availability in this timeframe.
1.9.2. Vulnerability and adaptation of agriculture and forestry
The National Reforestation Plan (PNR), implemented in 2000, aims to develop land, combat desertification, and enhance and protect natural resources in the context of sustainable development. It has set a target of reforestation of 1,250,000 ha over a period of 20 years and of raising the afforestation rate from 11% to 13% by 2020. The Directorate General for Forests
Page | 18
(DGF) has planted, between 2000 and today, more than 750 000 ha in the northern regions of Algeria, the high lands and the Sahara.
Algeria has integrated aspects related to combating desertification into the national plan of action to combat desertification (PANLCD), which is the strategic tool for intervention in the dry, semi-arid and dry sub-humid zones of the country, notably the rehabilitation of natural areas and the fight against silting.
1.10. Scientific Research and Atmospheric Observations
Climate change has also been integrated in national science research programs (PNR) aimed at improving knowledge of the impacts of climate change on systems and society and determining vulnerabilities and interactions with the society, as well as the means and methods of adaptation in the different bioclimatic stages . The PNR also aims to strengthen research on the vulnerability of systems to climate change through a socio-economic approach by integrating research in the social and economic sciences.
In technology, different research streams are devoted to greenhouse gas emissions and pollutants and and to means and methods of mitigation. For such research, collaboration with industry sectors is required to benefit from government subsidies. There is a PNR dedicated to renewable energies, comprising 117 research & development projects, with the Center for the Development of Renewable Energy ( CDER) acting as lead agency.
Within the framework of the higher education system (undergraduate, graduate, and post-graduate studies), student curricula has now integrated climate change and sustainable development issues. Doctoral theses were dedicated to climate change topics in the research centers and research laboratories of academic institutions, which led to the publication of many scientific publications.
The Center for Scientific and Technical Research on Arid Regions (CRSTRA) has also mainstreamed climate change issues through its activities, with particular attention to adaptation linked to food security, as well as innovation and generalization of new systems and irrigation techniques in arid regions.
In area of environment and health, the National Health Research Program has devoted a research axis to climate change and its impact on health.
1.11. The Algerian space agency (ASAL) has adopted an objective on enabling research development objective to improve the scientific knowledge of the region on climate and indicators of vulnerability to climate change through the space tool. Women’s involvement in the process
Women play a significant role in the decision-making process related to climate change, notably through participation of women representatives in within national institutions (APN, CN, ministries, agencies, associations, etc.) and other relevant ad hoc entities.
The adverse impacts of climate change continue to affect the poorest and the most vulnerable, especially poor women in rural areas. Poor women living in urban and rural areas are more vulnerable to climate change, despite implementing different local or traditional measures to adapt and build resiliency. Women are powerful agents of change and continue to make
Page | 19
increasing and significant contributions to sustainable development, despite existing structural and sociocultural barriers. However, with more training and capacity building, women will better cope with the adverse effects of the changing climate.
1.12. Civil society and associative movement participation
Environment-focused civil society in Algeria encompasses many non-profit environment associations or groups who contribute to environmental protection and the fight against climate change at the national and local levels. These associations are regularly involved in activities piloted by the Ministry of Environment and Renewable Energy, as well as other government actors.
To provide one example, the National Social and Economic Council (CNES) carried out nation-wide consultations with members of the civil society movement in 2015, in view of identifying local populations’ sustainable development needs in each region.
The Association for Research Climate and Environment (ARCE), created in 1993, is active in the field of climate change and the protection of the environment. It promotes multidisciplinary, cooperative research and development in the field of climate and the environment. It acts as an interface between the scientific community and institutions and decision-makers.
III. STRATEGY
1 Objectives, strategy and results
1.1. Project objectives
This project will enable Algeria to prepare, implement and submit its Third National Communication (TNC) on Climate Change to the UNFCCC, in accordance with relevant provisions of this instrument, as well as the different decisions adopted by the Conference of the Parties relating to transparency and reporting. The project will also support Algeria’s preparation of its First Biennial Update Report (BUR) in accordance with decision 2/CP17.
The project’s aim is also to strengthen the capacity of Algeria with regards to national reporting under the transparency framework established by the UNFCCC. This includes building the capacity of managers and experts from different ministerial departments and competent entities, as well as supporting the institutional mechanisms established since the submission of the Second National Communication in 2010.
It also aims to ensure the sustainability of these activities, in view of enabling Algeria to fulfil its transparency and reporting obligations arising from the UNFCCC and the Paris Agreement.
The project is to: (i) carry out the national inventory of greenhouse gas (GHG) ; (ii) analyse vulnerability and adaptation needs with regards to the negative impacts of climate change on the water resources, agricultural, health, and forest sectors; (iii) identify possible measures to be implemented to mitigate GHG emissions; and (iv) evaluate Algeria’s needs in terms of financing, technology transfer and capacity building.
Page | 20
The project will draw on the works and lessons learned from the first and second national communications processes, as well as from the studies carried out by the sectors involved in climate change issues, in particular those whose actions are considered as a matter of priority to reduce Algeria’s climate vulnerability.
The process leading to the production of the TNC and BUR 1 will rely on a participatory approach, involving all stakeholders. This approach will contribute to mainstreaming climate change issues at all levels of action and of decision-making, with regards to national policy on sustainable development and environmental protection issues.
The overall objectives of the project are summarized as follows:
Establish an inventory of GHG emission sources and removal sinks from all sectors (Energy, industry, agriculture, land use change and forestry, waste) throughout the national territory using the methodology prescribed in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s Guidelines (2006);
Identify actions and options for mitigating GHG emissions from energy, industry, waste, transportation and forestry sectors;
Study the vulnerability of the priority sectors (water, agriculture, forestry, health), in view of identifying strategies and adaptation measures to counter the harmful effects of climate change;
Identify constraints to the implementation of climate change strategies and plans and determine the needs of the country for financial and technical assistancethe financial, technological and capacity building needs in the country;
Strengthen institutional and human capacities to manage all aspects of climate change (training, education and awareness) and develop a national dialogue in view of setting up an information-exchange mechanism among all stakeholders.
Establish an evaluation system to assess internally long term national communication and BUR development process.
As part of its commitments under the UNFCCC, Algeria has initiated the process of preparing the TNC) and BUR 1. This process consists of the self-evaluation of the SNC, in accordance with Decision 17 / CP.8, to national, regional and thematic consultations for the identification of the priorities to consider in the TNC and BUR1 by stakeholders.
The TNC will be carried out in accordance with the guidelines contained in decision 17 / CP.8 . The BUR1 1 will be elaborated in accordance with the guidelines contained in decision 2/ CP 17 and will widely rely on the same methodologies adopted for the TNC.
1.2. Project strategy
The preparation of the TNC and BUR 1 constitutes an important step in the implementation the UNFCCC in Algeria and should contribute to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals in Algeria.
Page | 21
The TNC and BUR1 1 will build on all relevant documentation that could contribute to informing actions to be undertaken by Algeria with regards mitigation and adaptation to the harmful impacts of climate change. This documentation includes, among others, available scientific studies, data and other information provided by the sectors involved. As indicated above, the preparation of both reports (TNC and BUR1 1) will be based on:
Relevant recommendations and guidelines of the UNFCCC (i.e. Decision 17 / CP.8; Decision 2 / CP17)
User Manual for the Guidelines on National Communications from non-Annex I Parties (2004)
Toolkit for non-Annex I Parties on establishing and maintaining institutional arrangements for preparing national communications and biennial update reports (2013) ;
UNFCCC Resource Guide for Preparing the National Communications of Non-Annex I Parties: Module 1 (the process of national communications from non-annex I parties for preparing the national communications of non-annex I parties; module 3 : national greenhouse gas inventories (2009),
2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories.
The TNC and BUR 1 project will be carried out by the Climate Change Department of the Ministry of Environment and Renewable Energies (MEER) and the Department of Multilateral Relations of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MAE), with the support of UNDP Algeria and the UNDP-GEF Regional Technical Adviser (RTA).
Consultations with institutions and agencies concerned should result in greater visibility on the institutional arrangements to be put in place to prepare the TNC and BUR1. This exercise should take into account the evolving national context, The overall objective is to institutionalize the process of preparing and compiling National Communications and Biennial Update Reports, as well as create enabling conditions for the preparation of these reports within the prescribed reporting frequency.
The TNC and BUR1 preparation process is to identify the available data and possible data gaps, as well as data access procedures, constraints and barriers to data collection and processing, and to assess the need for supplementary data needed to produce the national inventory of GHG and relevant vulnerability and adaptation studies. It should also identify existing expertise and capacity building needs for the production of NCs and BURs on a regular basis.
The preparation of the TNC and BUR1 will require making use of the many studies and reports carried out by academic institutions, and national research centres. The involvement of the higher education and scientific research sector will also build the capacity of that sector to continue to contribute to NCs and BURs in the future.
Execution of the TNC and BUR1 project
Page | 22
The Ministry of the Environment and Renewable Energy, through its Climate Change Directorate (DCC), ensures, in close consultation with the Department of Multilateral Relations of the MFA (National Focal Point to the UNFCCC), the supervision and coordination of the project, as well as support to the mobilization of the necessary human, technical and financial resources. The DCC will organize information, awareness-raising and capacity-building activities, to support project implementation.
Relevant ministerial departments will benefit from capacity building and will be engaged in activities aiming to identify, prepare and implement GHG mitigation measures, as well as implement adaptation measures.
Other stakeholders, such as civil society and the private sector, will participate in the TNC and BUR1 preparation process, as well as in targeted capacity-building activities.
The main stakeholders identified include: APRUE, DGF, INRA, INRF, CNTPP, ONS, CNES, CERIST, CDER, CNL, ONA, ONM, CNFE, CNDRB, ONEDD, CRSTRA, MoE and chambers of commerce, industry, and Agriculture. These bodies are involved in the institutional arrangements for the realization of the TNC and BUR1 and the national greenhouse gas inventory.
Page | 23
IV. RESULTS AND PARTNERSHIPS
OBJECTIVES AND RESULTS
Objective 1: Greenhouse gas (GHG) inventory system and MRV (Measurement, Reporting and Verification)
Output 1.1: National GHG inventory updated and capacity to collect this information on an ongoing basis enhanced
Activity 1.1.1: GHG inventory for period of: BUR 2017-2018; TNC 2001-2020 prepared using 2006 IPCC guidelines; for the following sectors: Energy, IPPU (Industrial processes and product use), Agriculture, LUCF (Land Use Change and Forestry), waste.
- Identification and mobilization of sectoral experts, constitution of sectoral GHG inventory teams;
- Verification of existing information on previous GHG inventories (Activity data, emission factors, methodology, emissions, etc.);
- Institutionalization of procedures between data providers, sectoral and national inventory compilers within the framework of the national GHG inventory system;
Activity 1.1.2: Emissions and removals of GHG for the year 1994 and 2000 updated using 2006 IPCC guidelines and updated data
Activity 1.1.3: Process to collect and analyse GHG Inventory data developed and institutionalized within relevant agencies and ministries
- Development of methodologies on data collection and transmission protocols, harmonization with national statistical data collection process of ONS (National statistics office);
- Selection of methodologies of emission estimates, identification of sources or sinks without methodologies or emission factors in 2006 IPCC, search for appropriate methodologies and emission factors in accordance with 2006 IPCC;
- Identification of existing data sources for fluorinated gases (PFC, HFC, SF6, NF3) and description of missing data and necessary additional sources of information and data;
- Selection of methodologies to fill gaps in data time series and for calculation of emissions in the absence of data according to the 2006 IPCC methodology and the guide of good practice;
- Updating emissions and removals for GHG national inventories of years 1994 and 2000;
Page | 24
- Calculation of the emissions and removals inventory by GHG sector and national compilation for years 2001-2020;
- Key sources analysis of GHG national inventory for years 2001-2020;- Estimation of uncertainties of GHG emission inventory for years 2001-2020
Activity 1.1.4: GHG inventory team set up, training needs identified and capacities strengthened
- Identification of specific training needs for managerial staff of companies and institutions for the collection of GHG activity data and plant specific emission factors;
- Training the inventory team for activity data collection: data providers, companies, institutions, and organizations producing data. Awareness and involvement of private sector;
- Training of teams and national compilation experts and sectoral compilation entities for inventory calculation according to the 2006 IPCC methodology;
- Training of team members and data providers on emission calculation cycle (BUR, TNC) according to 2006 IPCC methodology;
Activity 1.1.5: QA/QC (quality assurance/quality control) inventory plan developed, implemented and applied on in a systematic way
- Development of a QA / QC plan and training of teams and working groups for the QA / QC plan implementation;
Activity 1.1.6: GHG Inventory data published, disseminated and archived
- Drafting the national inventory report including the emission inventory and all methodologies, assumptions and information of estimation carry out of all sectors, by sources and by sinks for the time series for the years 2001-2020;
- Dissemination of the inventory report for quality control according to the QA / QC plan;
- Review of the inventory report and national emissions inventory by an external expert for the quality assurance inventory;
- National dissemination workshop with the participation of all stakeholders including the civil society, considering the gender balance, to present the results of the GHG inventory;
- Submission of the national inventory report to CNC for validation process;- Finalization of the inventory and inventory report to be submitted as part of
Algeria's TNC and BUR1;- Verification of the databases of national and sectoral GHG inventory and its
archiving;- Communication campaign on the results of the inventory addressed to
institutions, local authorities, private and public sectors, academics and the public;
Page | 25
- Publication and dissemination of the national inventory of greenhouse gas emissions;
- Archiving of activity data, emission factors used and estimates of GHG inventories;
- Archiving of all the documentation used for the inventory of years 2001-2020.
Output 1.2: MRV for GHG Inventory developed and implemented
Activity 1.2.1: MRV system for the national GHG emissions inventory system developed
- Development of MRV system for the national GHG emissions inventory system, training of stakeholders to implement MRV system;
Activity 1.2.2: Key stakeholders trained in the implementation of the MRV system for the national inventory system
Objective 2: Mitigation actions and domestic MRV system.
Output 2.1: Mitigation actions and their effects reported and monitored, and capacity to collect and analyse this information on an ongoing basis strengthened
Activity 2.1.1: Assessment of capacity building needs for mitigation actions development and implementation, reporting and analysis;
Activity 2.1.2: Strengthening capacities of institutions, agencies and companies of key sectors for collection, analysis and reporting of data and information on mitigation actions, policies and measures at sectoral and local level
- Capacity-building for collection and analysis of information on mitigation policies and measure
- Design of mitigation capacity building program;- Identification and prioritization of mitigation options for priority sectors:
Energy, Industry, Transportation, Habitat, Waste and Forest;- Development of appropriate national mitigation measures (NAMAs) for
different sectors at national and local level;- Identification of the potential mitigation actions for updating NDCs;
Activity 2.1.3: Strengthening capacities of national experts to analyze mitigation actions and measures and to estimate their effects and to develop mitigation scenarios for Algeria by 2030
Activity 2.1.4: Assessment of national policies, strategies and measures undertaken for GHG mitigation in key sectors and how mainstreaming mitigation in different institutions and agencies at national and local levels
Activity 2.1.5: Identification, collect and report of information and data on mitigation actions in key sectors: Energy, Industry, Transportation, building, waste and forestry.
Page | 26
- Analysis of GHG emissions mitigation policies, strategies and measures in key sectors;
- Development of GHG emission scenarios, the BAU scenario and development of new mitigation scenarios, including their macroeconomic and social impacts;
- Selection of methodologies and models’ mitigation. Training of national experts to the development of scenarios and the use of the mitigation model. Development of mitigation scenarios for Algeria by 2030;
- Application of the model for the projection of GHG emissions with the BAU scenario and other mitigation scenarios, including the macroeconomic and social evaluation of GHG mitigation measures;
- Training of sectors to the development of NAMA. Definition of priority NAMAs of different sectors at national level;
Activity 2.1.6: Identification of needs, gaps and constraints related to technical, financial and capacity building needs for development and implementation of mitigation actions
- Analysis of constraints and barriers related to the implementation of mitigation policies and measures;
- Analysis of funding needs, technology transfer and capacity building for the implementation of national and local mitigation actions;
- Assessment of Gaps and needs to meet the mitigation Policy objectives to be implemented by 2040;
- Drafting mitigation report;- Submission mitigation report for QC/QA;- National mitigation workshop to present the results of modelling, and analysis
and forecasting of mitigation policies and measures;- Finalization of the mitigation report (policies and measures) and its submission
to CNC for the validation process;- Archiving documents of all studies, modelling inputs and outputs, assumptions
and estimates related to mitigation policies and measures.
Output 2.2: Design of domestic Measurement, Reporting and Verification system supported
Activity 2.2.1: Information and awareness of policy makers and decision makers on MRV system.
Activity 2.2.2: Capacity building provided to institutions and sectors, to experts and all stakeholders to implement MRV system on mitigation actions.
- Institutional and sectoral capacity building on the Measurement, Reporting and Verification (MRV) system of GHG mitigation actions to support NAMAs;
- Information and sensitization actions for decision makers on the MRV system and the development of NAMA;
- Training workshops on the MRV system for mitigation working groups and experts;
Page | 27
- Training of sectoral and local technical staff for baseline definition and application of MRV to GHG mitigation measures;
Activity 2 2.3: Development of methodologies and tools for MRV implementation on mitigation actions, and MRV best practices disseminated
- Development of methodologies and tools for measurement, reporting, verification (MRV), GHG mitigation actions, and a MRV use and good practice manual;
Activity 2.2.4: MRV system mainstreamed among all institutions and agencies and implemented by all stakeholders
Objective 3: Assessment of vulnerability to climate change of key sectors and development of adaptation measures.
Output 3.1: Technical and scientific capacities of experts and stakeholders built and reinforced with tools and methods for modeling and analysis of vulnerability to climate change and impacts for key sectors assessed and costs estimated (water, agriculture, forestry, health);
Activity 3.1.1: Capacity building provided to all staff and experts to reinforce their skills on vulnerability assessment to climate change and modeling.
Activity 3.1.2: Selection of tools and methodologies and training of experts and all sectoral staff for their use to assess vulnerability to climate change.
- Selection of models and revision of climate scenarios, capacity building of experts for modeling and understanding climate scenarios for Algeria;
- Assessment of capacity building needs of the working group and national experts; and training to improve their competences in vulnerability studies;
- Selection of tools and methodologies for assessing vulnerability climate change and training of Experts and Working Group;
Activity 3.1.3: Updating climate medium and long-term scenarios using several regional climate models (RCMs) and projections of climate change of key sectors.
- Review of medium- and long-term scenarios for priority sectors in vulnerability and adaptation;
- Updating climate scenarios using several regional climate models (RCMs);
Activity 3.1.4: Data collection and methodology identification to ensure a climate vulnerability assessment in key sectors: water, agriculture, forestry, and health.
- Vulnerability analysis and projections of climate change impacts for different regions of Algeria, impact assessment;
- Analysis of vulnerability of different regions (tell, highlands, the Sahara) and different sectors, vulnerability assessment of specific regions (watersheds, forests, agricultural zone, coastal areas.),
Page | 28
- Review of information provided by SNC and other studies in Algeria on vulnerability and impacts with identified gaps,
- Data collection and selection of assessment methodologies to ensure assessment synergy;
- Analysis of data, assumptions and results of models used in the water, agriculture, forests, and health sectors;
Activity 3.1.5: Data Analysis, modeling, and mapping of vulnerabilities to climate change and risks, including extreme weather events for key sectors.
- Mapping of climate vulnerabilities and risks, including extreme weather events at the regional and sectoral levels;
- Assessment of progress in implementing proposed adaptation measures in the SNC and other reports for the most vulnerable sectors, with a cost-benefit analysis;
Activity 3.1.6: Analysis of vulnerability impacts and projections with cost estimation in different regions (tell, highlands, Sahara) for key sectors (water, forestry, agriculture, health.)
- Undertake studies of vulnerability, climate change impacts and adaptation at national and local level (agriculture, coastline, livestock, forests, water resources, etc.) including socio-economic analysis according to national priorities;
- Undertake study of vulnerability and adaptation of the health sector to climate change and identification of adaptation measures and identification of capacity building needs for the implementation of adaptation measures in this sector;
- Development of adaptation measures to climate change adapted and sensitive gender for priority sectors (agriculture, forests, health, water, coastal areas, etc.);
- Cost-benefit analysis of proposed adaptation measures and identification of investment opportunities;
Output 3.2: National and sectoral adaptation capacities strengthened and adaptation policies and measures mainstreamed in national, local and sectoral territory management and planning processes, and adaptation actions disseminated.
Activity 3.2.1: Information and awareness of policy makers and policy makers to climate change adaptation.
- Information and sensitization campaign of sectors and different stakeholders to climate change adaptation;
Activity 3.2.2: Capacity of experts and sectoral staff reinforced to conduct assessment on adaptation measures and their implementation, report on implementation progress of adaptation measures
Page | 29
Activity 3.2.3: Mainstreaming and strengthening adaptation to climate change in current institutional and policy framework, in sectoral and local populations development planning processes.
- Analysis of the current institutional and policy framework of adaptation to climate change;
- Integration of adaptation policies and measures into the processes of national, local and sectoral planning;
Activity 3.2.4: Development of adaptation measures portfolio to climate change adapted and gender sensitive for priority sectors (agriculture, forestry, health, water, coastal zones.)
- Development of portfolio of priority adaptation options by sector and assessment of investment necessary needs;
Activity 3.2.5: Cost-benefit analysis of adaptation measures and identification of investment needs.
Activity 3.2.6: Dissemination of adaptation measures and archiving
- Drafting the vulnerability and adaptation report, dissemination for QC and QA procedure, submission of report to CNC for validation process;
- National workshop to present vulnerability and adaptation report for dissemination;
- Archiving all studies and estimates related to vulnerability and adaptation.
Objective 4: National circumstances, institutional arrangements, constraints & gaps, related financial, technical & capacity needs and other relevant information
Output 4.1: National Circumstances and institutional arrangements relevant to the preparation of the biennial update report and national communications updated.
Activity 4.1.1: Description of geographical and socio-economic (economy, education, population, health, livelihoods) characteristics, with gender disaggregated data wherever possible
- Collection of information on new developments in national Description of geographical and socio-economic (economy, education, population, health, livelihoods) characteristics, with gender disaggregated data wherever possible
Activity 4.1.2: Review and analysis of national development objectives, priorities and circumstances, and the specific needs and concerns arising from the climate change risks
Activity 4.1.3: Description of institutional arrangements relevant to the preparation of the national communications on a continuous basis including distribution of responsibilities within ministerial departments, universities, research institutions, etc.
Page | 30
Activity 4.1.4: Mechanisms for gender responsive stakeholder involvement, coordination and participation to enable the preparation of national communications and biennial update reports on a sustainable manner identified
Output 4.2: Constraints and gaps identified; financial, technology, policy and capacity building needs assessed and recommendation for addressing the needs provided
Activity 4.2.1: Technology, financial and capacity needs for mitigation assessed.
Activity 4.2.2: Review and assess constraints, gaps, technology, financial and capacity needs.
Activity 4.2.3: Identify new constraints, gaps, technology, financial and capacity needs
Activity 4.2.4: Identify and propose solutions to the constraints, gaps, technology, financial and capacity needs
Output 4.3: Other information relevant for the preparation of BUR1 (First Biennial Update Report) and TNC consolidated;
Activity 4.3.1: Review of national plans and programs relative to the systematic observation, to the climate research; and forecasting capacity
Activity 4.3.2: Collection and analysis of women's contribution to mitigation and adaptation strategies, particularly in education, training, information, sensitization and energy use.
Activity 4.3.3: Identification and preparation of programs of needs, gaps and priorities in education, training, public awareness; and transfer of technology
Activity 4.3.4: Other information relevant for the implementation of the climate change convention (UNFCCC)
Objective 5: Compilation of Third National Communication and First Biennial Update Report (BUR1), Monitoring and Evaluation
Output 5.1: BUR1 and TNC compiled, endorsed by the Government and submitted to UNFCCC
Activity 5.1.1: BUR1 compiled, translated, approved, disseminated and submitted to the UNFCCC
Activity 5.1.2: TNC compiled, translated, approved, disseminated and submitted to the UNFCCC
Activity 5.1.3: Synthesis reports and sensitization of decision makers and general public to the results of the TNC and BUR1;
Output 5.2: Project regularly monitored, financial audit conducted and lessons learned compiled
Activity 5.2.1: Inception workshop, project board meetings and validation workshop held
Activity 5.2.2: Project financial and progress reports prepared and submitted.
Page | 31
Activity 5.2.3: End of project report and lessons learned compiled.
STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PLAN
t is expected that the implementation of this project will involve the intervention of actors from different backgrounds, including line ministries and agencies, local collectives and authorities, and NGOs, mass-media, research institutions, private sector and international organizations,
The Ministry of the Environment and Renewable Energy (MEER) through the Climate Change Directorate (CCD), ensures in close consultation with the Department of Multilateral Relations of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) (National Focal Point to the UNFCCC) the supervision and coordination, as well as support to the mobilization of human, technical and financial resources.
Sectoral ministries will benefit from capacity building and activities aiming to identify, prepare and implement GHG mitigation measures in key sectors and adaptation measures. Other competent structures, such as universities, research laboratories, research centres and thematic research agencies, will also participate in research, experimentation and training activities, taking into account their role in the scientific, technology and innovation fields. They will feed the TNC and BUR1 with data and information for inventory, climate change vulnerability and adaptation studies, and options and mitigation measures. They will also contribute to the development of methodologies and information and awareness-raising measures of the industrial and economic sectors.
Other stakeholders, such as civil society and the private sector, will participate in all activities of the TNC and BUR1 preparation process and capacity-building activities in local collectives, the associative movement, employers' organizations and Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and Small and Medium Industries (SMIs).
The main stakeholders identified include: National Agency for the Promotion and Rationalization of the Use of Energy (APRUE), Directorate general of forests (DGF), Institute of Agronomic Research of Algeria (INRAA), National Forest Research Institute (INRF), National Center for Cleaner Production Technologies (CNTPP), national statistics office (ONS), National Economic and Social Council (CNES), Center for Research on Scientific and Technical Information (CERIST), Renewable Energy Development Center (CDER), National Commissariat of the Littoral (CNL), National Sanitation Office (ONA), national office of meteorology (ONM), National Conservatory of Environmental Training (CNFE), National Center for the Development of Biological Resources (CNDRB), National Observatory of the Environment and Sustainable Development (ONEDD), Center for Scientific and Technical Research on Arid Regions (CRSTRA), Ministry of energy (MoE) and chambers of commerce, industry, and Agriculture. These organizations are involved in the institutional arrangements, and as part of the national inventory system, for the preparation of the TNC and BUR1 and the national greenhouse gas inventory.
Page | 32
GENDER EQUALITY AND EMPOWERING WOMEN:
Algerian women are significantly involved not only as beneficiaries but also as actors in the decision-making process of key climate change activities. They are expected to play a greater role, even they are already present and represented at different levels within national institutions (National Popular Assembly (APN), Council of the Nation (CN), ministries, agencies, associations, etc.).
The integration of the gender dimension in the development phase of the TCN and BUR1 will be based on, the Global Support Programme through UNDP and in collaboration with UNEP and GEF, will be applied: http://www.un-gsp.org/news/gender-responsive-national-communications-toolkit
In line with the GEF SEC’s policy on gender equality1 and Guidance to advance gender equality in GEF projects and programs2, project will prepare and finalize Gender analysis and Gender action plan3 during its inception phase4.
A gender disaggregated analysis approach will be implemented, and gender-sensitive stakeholders and partners’ involvement plan will be adopted.When updating information on national circumstances, the gender dimension will be taken into account in order to analyse the role played by women in influencing climate change mitigation and adaptation. The project will demonstrate how women are integrated into national strategies on climate change and contribute to actions to combat their impacts, in particular in education, training, information, awareness-raising, consumption of fossil fuels and promotion of renewable energies.
Efforts will also be made to have acceptable gender representation in project management structures (committees, institutional frameworks, technical team) and capacity building actions (trainings, workshops).
1 http://www.thegef.org/sites/default/files/council-meeting-documents/EN_GEF.C.53.04_Gender_Policy.pdf2 http://www.thegef.org/sites/default/files/council-meeting-documents/EN_GEF.C.54.Inf_.05_Guidance_Gender_0.pdf3 Guide to Conducting a Participatory Gender Analysis and Developing a Gender Action Plan for projects supported by UNDP with GEF financing: https://intranet.undp.org/unit/bpps/sdev/gef/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=/unit/bpps/sdev/gef/Gender%20Library/UNDP%20GEF%20Guidance.%20How%20to%20conduct%20gender%20analysis%20and%20gender%20action%20plan.pdf&action=default4 The GEF Enabling Activities and policy/strategy work 33. Enabling Activity projects provide financing for the preparation of a plan, strategy, or national program to fulfill the commitments under the Conventions that the GEF serves, including national communication or reports to the Conventions. Similarly, many GEF-financed medium- and full-size projects include activities that focus on developing and preparing national policies or strategies and, as such, do not work directly with beneficiaries on the ground. These plans and strategies provide an essential opportunity to recognize, build capacity, and to develop actions to advance GEWE. Some possible actions to include in these national documents include the following: ▪ request that gender experts review draft plans and strategies;▪ ensure that any background and stocktaking exercises associated with development of the plans and strategies adequately account for the different roles for women and men;▪ ensure that women are effectively engaged as members of stakeholder groups consulted during development of the strategies and plans;▪ consider including gender-disaggregated data collection and/or gender-specific indicators; and ▪ consider how national gender policies can be incorporated into sectoral strategies and action plans.
Page | 33
Consultations on gender issues at national level will include, among others, the Ministry of National solidarity, Family and the Status of Women, Ministry of Labor, Employment and Social Security, the UNFCCC Gender Focal Point,, civil society organizations working in the fields of gender and climate change as well as research institutions and development partners working on gender issues.
SOUTH-SOUTH AND TRIANGULAR COOPERATION (SSTRC):
It is envisaged to share and benefit from regional experience (in particular from Tunisia and Morocco because of numerous common climate conditions and similar societal and economic conditions) in dealing with NCs and BURs reports preparation and reporting for different sectors. This will be conducted under the guidance of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the national focal point through different multiple workshops where representatives from Morocco and Tunisia would be invited to attend to exchange with the Algerians. Knowledge transfer from developed countries is also planned through exchange with experts from France (CITEPA) and German Environment Agency (UBA) on the development and implementation of the national inventory system and the MRV one. This will be realized under the bilateral cooperation with each country.
SUSTAINABILITY AND SCALING UP:
The implementation of this project will serve to reinforce all existing and new capacities to mainstream climate change in national and sectoral policies and to implement the national GHG inventory system with the National MRV system. With all sectoral teams trained and experienced throughout the TNC and BUR1 exercise, long-term sustainability of the systems put in place is expected. Training of trainers in all sectors will disseminate the knowledge and scale up all results obtained in all subsectors in the country.
Page | 34
V. PROJECT RESULTS FRAMEWORK:
This project will contribute to the following Sustainable Development Goal (s): SDG 13: Climate action
This project will contribute to the following country outcome included in the UNDAF/ By 2020, citizens’ livelihoods and resilience have improved through sustainable and participatory management of natural and urban ecosystems.
This project will be linked to the following output of the UNDP Strategic Plan:
Output 2.1.1: Low emission and climate resilient objectives addressed in national, sub- national and sectoral development plans and policies to promote economic diversification and green growth
Objective and Outcome Indicators(no more than a total of 15 -16 indicators)
Baseline5 End of Project Target Data Collection Methods and Risks/Assumptions6
Project Objective:
Preparation of the Third National Communication (TNC) and BUR 1
Indicator 1: SP IRRF Indicator 2.1.1.1 Country has targets for low emission and climate-resilient development
Yes (Algeria INDC)
Yes (Updated data and information on progress towards NDC targets and implementation of UNFCCC)
Data source: Project data, reports
Risks: - Low mobilization of sectoral
experts - Low involvement of stakeholders
Assumptions: Strong Political and financial
support of the Government and all institutions concerned for the implementation of UNFCCC
Commitment of all sectors to contribute to provide BUR1 and TNC with necessary data and information
Indicator 2: TNC and BUR1 validated and submitted to UNFCCC
Second National Communication
-BUR1 elaborated and validated by CNC and ready for submission to UNFCCC-TNC elaborated and validated by CNC and ready for submission to UNFCCC
Indicator 3: 9 Ministries represented on the National Climate Committee (CNC) are engaged and empowered to effectively participate in UNFCCC reporting processes
No (Ministry representatives are designated but not trained)
Yes (Ministry representatives benefit from project technical assistance and are empowered to effectively participate in UNFCCC reporting processes and act as climate focal points in their respective sectors)
Data source: Final project report and feedback received through SC
Risks:- Ministries may change their
designated representatives over
5 Baseline, mid-term and end of project target levels must be expressed in the same neutral unit of analysis as the corresponding indicator. Baseline is the current/original status or condition and need to be quantified. The baseline must be established before the project document is submitted to the GEF for final approval. The baseline values will be used to measure the success of the project through implementation monitoring and evaluation. 6 Data collection methods should outline specific tools used to collect data and additional information as necessary to support monitoring. The PIR cannot be used as a source of verification.
Page | 35
Objective and Outcome Indicators(no more than a total of 15 -16 indicators)
Baseline End of Project Target Data Collection Methods and Risks/Assumptions
the course of the project- absence of institutional memoryAssumptions:- Methodologies and consultative
processes under the project will build institutional capacity
Ministries/representatives will participate in all project activities
Component/Outcome7 1
Greenhousegas (GHG)inventorysystem andMRV(Measurement,Reporting andVerification)
Indicator 4: National GHG inventory updated and capacity to collect this information on an ongoing basis enhanced
The ANCC inventory department exists but without a national inventory system implemented
National inventory system developed, institutionalized and fully operational and sectoral entities and inventory teams trained on 2006 IPCC methodology and operational- GHG inventory for period of: BUR 2017-2018; TNC 2010-2020 prepared using 2006IPCC guidelines; for the following sectors:Energy, IPPU (Industrial processes andproduct use), Agriculture, LUCF (Land UseChange and Forestry), waste- Emissions and removals of GHG for the year 1994 and 2000 updated using 2006 IPCC guidelines and updated data- Process to collect and analyze GHG Inventory data developed and institutionalized within relevant agencies and ministries- GHG inventory team set up, training needs identified and capacities strengthened- QA/QC (quality assurance/quality control) inventory plan developed, implemented and applied on in a systematic way- GHG Inventory data published, disseminated and archived
Data source: MEER, CNC, ANCC, project reports, following methodology of IPCC 2006 guidelines
Risks:- Difficulties in accessing private sector data-Confidentiality of certain data and information from the energy and industry sectors- Efficient implementation of QA / QC planAssumptions: - Involvement of decision makers in
the process- Project will lead to sectoral
commitments to provide data on a regular and continuous basis
- Sectoral entities will fulfil procedures and protocol for the transmission of inventory data
Indicator 5: MRV for GHG Inventory developed and implemented
No institutionalized procedures for to establish inventory
-MRV system for the national GHG emissions inventory system developed-Key stakeholders trained in the implementation of the MRV system for the national inventory system
Data source: MEER, CNC, project reports
Risks:
7Outcomes are short to medium term results that the project makes a contribution towards, and that are designed to help achieve the longer term objective. Achievement of outcomes will be influenced both by project outputs and additional factors that may be outside the direct control of the project.
Page | 36
Objective and Outcome Indicators(no more than a total of 15 -16 indicators)
Baseline End of Project Target Data Collection Methods and Risks/Assumptions
No operational sectoral entity for sectoral inventory compilation
- MRV system not adopted/implemented
Assumptions:- Involvement of decision makers in
the processComponent/ Outcome 2
Mitigation actions and domestic MRV
Indicator 6: Mitigation actions and their effects reported and monitored, and capacity to collect and analyze this information on an ongoing basis strengthened
Analysis of mitigation actions was carried out and reported in Algeria’s SNC and first NDC. -
-Assessment of mitigation actions effects carried out and estimation of emission reductions achieved realized -Identification of mitigation contributions of different sectors assessed -Development of sectoral NAMA in energy, industry, transport, building and waste- NDCs updated
Data source: MEER, CNC, UNFCCC website.
Risks:- Difficulties to get data input to estimate emissions- Confidentiality of data for some projects carried out in partnership with international companiesAssumptions:- Sectors are committed to adopt
and implement mitigation measures
- Companies have the technical and human resource capabilities to plan and implement mitigation actions
Indicator76: Design of domestic MRV system supported
PNC revised not yet implemented
- Information and awareness of policy and decision makers on MRV system increased; Institutions, sectors, experts and stakeholders trained to implement MRV system on mitigation actions
Data source: project reports.
Risks:- MRV system not
adopted/implementedAssumptions:Availability and interest of stakeholders to participate in awareness-raising and capacity-building activities in the process
Component/ Outcome 3
Assessment of vulnerability to climate change of key sectors and development of adaptation measures
Indicator 8: Technical and scientific capacities of experts andstakeholders built and reinforced withtools and methods for modeling and analysis of vulnerability to climate change and impacts for key sectors assessed and costs estimated (water, agriculture, forestry, health)
Existing studies: Impact of climate change study on water resources, National strategy of flood control and management
- Mapping of climate change impacts on underground and surface water resources
- Adaptation strategy of water resources sector adopted to guarantee water security in Algeria
- Impacts of future climate change on the capacity to regulate reservoir dams elaborated
- Vulnerability to Climate Change of the Hydrographic Basin-Oranie Chott Chergui
Data sources: ANCC, MREE, DGF, INRA, and INRF; Available and accessible meteorological and agro-meteorological data
Risks:- Unavailability of relevant data- Unavailability of national expertise to
Page | 37
Objective and Outcome Indicators(no more than a total of 15 -16 indicators)
Baseline End of Project Target Data Collection Methods and Risks/Assumptions
- Floods early warning system
determined- Impacts of climate change on forests (the
BELEZMA cedar and SENALBA's Aleppo pine) and their adaptation evaluated
- Impact of climate change on water availability and agricultural production assessed.
carry out specific studies related to V&A Assumptions: - Involvement of researchers and academia to elaborate vulnerability and adaptation studies-Participation of all stakeholders and sectoral experts
Indicator 9: National and sectoral adaptation capacities strengthened andadaptation policies and measures mainstreamed in national, local and sectoral territory management and planning processes, and adaptation actions disseminated
As above- Information and awareness of policy makers to climate change adaptation increased- Capacity of experts and sectoral staff to conduct assessment on adaptation measures and their implementation, report on implementation progress of adaptation measures reinforced- Mainstreaming and strengthening adaptation to climate change in current institutional and policy framework, in sectoral development planning processes.- Development of adaptation measures portfolio to climate change adapted and gender sensitive for priority sectors (agriculture, forestry, health, water, coastal zones.)- Cost-benefit analysis of adaptation measures and identification of investment needs.- Dissemination of adaptation measures and archiving.
-Data sources: Studies reports posted on the website of ANCC, MREE, DGF, INRA, and INRF
Risks:
Assumptions:-Participation of all stakeholders and sectoral experts
Component/ Outcome 4National Circumstances, Institutional Arrangements, Constraints & Gaps, related financial, technical & capacity needs and Other relevant Information
Indicator 10: National Circumstances and Institutional arrangements relevant to the preparation of the biennial update report and national communicationsupdated
SNC All types of analysis are carried out and reports are elaborated and published
Data source: TNC and BUR 1
Risks:- Unavailability of valid data and information from official bodies- Insufficient data qualityAssumptions:- Thematic working groups are
comprised of qualified and experienced experts
- All governmental bodies are involved in the process and
Page | 38
Objective and Outcome Indicators(no more than a total of 15 -16 indicators)
Baseline End of Project Target Data Collection Methods and Risks/Assumptions
respond in a timely mannerIndicator 11: Constraints and gaps identified; financial, technology, policy and capacity building needs assessed and recommendation for addressing the needsprovided
SNC
-All types of needs analysis are carried out and reports are elaborated and published
Data source: TNC and BUR 1
Risks:- Unavailability of valid data and information from official bodies- Insufficient data qualityAssumptions:- Thematic working groups are
comprised of qualified and experienced experts
All governmental bodies are involved in the process and respond in a timely manner
Indicator 12: Other information relevant for the preparation of TNC and BUR 1 consolidated
SNC
All types of analysis are carried out and reports are elaborated and published
Data source: TNC and BUR 1
Risks:- Unavailability of valid data and information from official bodies- Insufficient data qualityAssumptions:- Thematic working groups are
comprised of qualified and experienced experts
- All governmental bodies are involved in the process and respond in a timely manner
Component/ Outcome 5Compilation of Third National Communication and First Biennial Update Report (BUR1), Monitoring and Evaluation
Indicator 13: BUR1 and TNC compiled, endorsed by the Government and submitted to UNFCCC (Yes/No)
No Yes (Reports completed and validated and made available; Institutions, sectors and decision-makers and the public informed about the content of the reports disseminated)
Data source: UNFCCC website
Risks:- Slow project implementation and delay of tasks execution- Low mobilization of sectoral experts - Low involvement of stakeholders Assumptions: - All working groups meet the deadlines for the activities of each part of BUR1
Page | 39
Objective and Outcome Indicators(no more than a total of 15 -16 indicators)
Baseline End of Project Target Data Collection Methods and Risks/Assumptions
and TNC- All stakeholders participate on time to the examination of the documents submitted for their validationAll sectors and stakeholders revise, comment and validate the reports in due time
Indicator 13: Project regularly monitored, financial audit conducted and lessons learned compiled
Inception workshop, project board meetings and validation workshop reports, financial and progress reports, end of project report.
Risks:
Assumptions:
Project Management Indicator 14: Project implementation and financial expenditure closely monitored through monthly and semi-annual reports and steps report, and Periodic Expenditure report
Project TNC and BUR1, planning of project implementation and project budget approved
All activities realized on time, and budget consumption is controlled without exceeding the allocated amount
Data source: Project reports
Risks:- Loss in exchange- - Fluctuation of the Algerian Dinar against US Dollar- High inflationAssumptions: -Efficient execution plan regularly updated
Page | 40
FINANCIAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, TOTAL BUDGET AND WORK PLAN
The total cost of the project is USD 3,332,000. This is financed through a GEF grant of USD 852,000, co-financing of UNDP in amount of US$ 80,000 managed via UNDP financial system; and co-financing by the government of USD 900,000 in cash managed by the government and USD 1,500,000 in kind. UNDP, as the GEF Implementing Agency, is responsible for the execution of the GEF and UNDP resources.
Parallel co-financing: The actual realization of project co-financing will be monitored and will be reported to the GEF. The planned parallel co-financing will be used as follows:
Co-financing source
Co-financing
type
Co-financing amount
Planned Activities/Outputs
Risks Risk Mitigation Measures
Government In kind 1,500,000 Climate change agency staff, infrastructure, equipment, offices
Very low risk Granted by the government budgeted for ANCC by the ministry of environment and renewable energy
Government Cash 900,000 Financial support to activities under TNC and BUR
Very low risk Granted by the government budgeted for ANCC by the ministry of environment and renewable energy
Total Budget and Work PlanAtlas8 Proposal or Award ID: 00111680 Atlas Primary Output Project ID: 00110577Atlas Proposal or Award Title: TNC and BUR1 Atlas Business Unit DZA10Atlas Primary Output Project Title Elaboration of the TNC and the BUR1 of Algeria
UNDP-GEF PIMS No. 5267Implementing Partner Ministry of Environment and Renewable Energy
8 See separate guidance on how to enter the TBWP into AtlasPage | 41
GEF Outcome/Atlas Activity
Responsible Party/
Implementing Agent
Fund ID
Donor Name
Atlas Budget
ary Accou
nt Code
ATLAS Budget Description
Amount Year 1 (USD)
Amount Year 2 (USD)
Amount Year 3 (USD)
Amount Year 4 (USD)
Total (USD)
See Budget
Note
Outcome 1Greenhouse gas (GHG) inventory system and MRV (Measurement,
Reporting and Verification)
Ministry of Environment
and Renewable
Energy
62000 GEF
71200 International Consultants 20,000 20,000 4,000 4,000 48,000 1
71300 Local Consultants 60,000 60,000 20,000 26,000 166,000 2
75700Training,
Workshops and Conference
14,000 8,000 10,000 4,000 36,000 3
71600 Travel 3,000 3,000 1,000 1,000 8,000 4
74200 Audio Visual & Print Costs 8,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 17,000 5
74500 Miscellaneous Expenses 1,000 1,000 2,000 3,000 7,000 6
Total Outcome 1 106,000 95,000 40,000 41,000 282,000
Outcome 2Mitigation actions and
domestic MRV
Ministry of Environment
and Renewable
Energy
62000 GEF
71200 International Consultants 8,000 8,000 8,000 6,000 30,000 1
71300 Local Consultants 22,000 22,000 22,000 9,000 75,000 2
75700Training,
Workshops and Conference
10,000 10,000 8,000 2,000 30,000 3
71600 Travel 4,000 4,000 1,000 1,000 10,000 4
74200 Audio Visual & Print Costs 2,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 5,000 5
Total Outcome 2 46,000 45,000 40,000 19,000 150,000
Outcome 3Assessment of
vulnerability to climate change of key sectors and development of adaptation measures
Ministry of Environment
and Renewable
Energy
62000 GEF 71200 International Consultants 15,000 15,000 6,000 2,000 38,000 1
71300 Local Consultants 33,000 33,000 28,000 7,000 101,000 2
75700 Training, Workshops and
Conference
5,000 5,000 5,000 0 15,000 3
Page | 42
71600 Travel 1,000 400 100 0 1,500 4
74200 Audio Visual & Print Costs 2,000 1,000 1,000 500 4,500 5
Total Outcome 3 56,000 54,400 40,100 9,500 160,000
Outcome 4
National Circumstances, Institutional
Arrangements, Constraints & Gaps,
related financial, technical & capacity
needs and Other relevant Information
Ministry of Environment
and Renewable
Energy
62000 GEF
71200 International Consultants 10,000 7,500 5,000 5,000 27,500 1
71300 Local Consultants 15,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 45,000 2
75700Training,
Workshops and Conference
5,000 3,000 3,000 3,500 14,500 3
71600 Travel 2,000 1,000 0 0 3,000 4
Total Outcome 4 32,000 26,500 18,000 13,500 90,000
Outcome 5Compilation of Third
National Communication and First Biennial Update
Report (BUR1), Monitoring and
Evaluation
Ministry of Environment
and Renewable
Energy
62000 GEF
71300 Local Consultants 5,000 15,000 5,000 13,600 38,600 2
75700Training,
Workshops and Conference
10,000 0 0 0 10,000 3
74100 Professional Services 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 16,000 7
74200 Audio Visual & Print Costs 0 15,000 3,000 9,950 27,950 5
Total Outcome 5 19,000 34,000 12,000 27,550 92,550
PROJECT MANAGEMENT UNIT
Ministry of Environment
and Renewable
Energy/UNDP
04000 UNDP 71400Contractual
Services Individual
20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 80,000 8
62000 GEF71400
Contractual Services
Individual10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 40,000 8
72800 Information Tech. & Equip. 6,000 500 500 500 7,500 9
74500 Miscellaneous Expenses
3,000 2,000 2,000 1,080 8,080 6
Page | 43
74596Services to
projects - GOE for CO’
5,467.5 5,467.5 5,467.5 5,467.5 21,870 10
sub-total GEF 24,467.5 17,967.5 17,967.5 17,047.5 77,450sub-total UNDP 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 80,000
Total Management 44,467.5 37,967.5 37,967.5 37,047.5 157,450
Total GEF 283,467.50 272,867.50 168,067.50 127,597.50 852,000
Total UNDP 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 80,000
PROJECT TOTAL 303,467.50 292,867.50 188,067.5 147,597.50 932,000.00
Page | 44
Summary of Funds:
Amount
Year 1
US$
Amount
Year 2
US$
Amount
Year 3
US$
Amount
Year 4
US$
Total
US$
GEF 283,467.50 272,867.50 168,067.50 127,597.50 852,000.00
UNDP 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 80,000
GOV (cash)9 225,000.00 225,000.00 225,000.00 225,000.00 900,000.00
Government (in-kind) 375,000.00 375,000.00 375,000.00 375,000.00 1,500,000,00
Total 903,467.50 892,867.50 788,067.50 747,597.50 3,332,000.00
Note de
Budget
Signification
1 International project expert consultants (205 man days Short-term expertise at a rate of US $ 700 / day). There are four international experts (inventory, adaptation, mitigation and quality assurance for the two reports TNC and BUR1).
2 National project expert consultants (1064 man days of short-term expertise at a rate of US $ 400 / day) to carry out the activities.
3 A sum of $ 105,500 has been provided for capacity development/ training and conferences, as well as all other services required by project activities, including consulting and validation workshops, Inception Workshop, Learning Workshops and conference
4 The travel section of US $ 22,500 is reserved for travel of national and international consultants (inside the country) as well as the project team as part of participation activities at the various meetings and forums to present the results of the work and progress of the TNC and BUR1 and the presentation of the two reports to the COP and FSV (The facilitative sharing of views).
5 A sum of $ 54,450 has been provided for Audio Visual & Print Costs
6 A sum of $ 15,080 has been attributed under “Miscellaneous” for the entire project. The precise cost of some ground activities is difficult to anticipate. Miscellaneous expenses will cover for additional expenses of the project where necessary.
9 Co-financing in cash represents the annual budget allocated by the government to the Climate Change Agency (ANCC), which is dedicated to the realization of the national greenhouse gas emissions inventory and the realization of national studies and reports and consultancy related to adaptation and mitigation of climate change in Algeria.
Page | 45
7 A sum of $ 16,000 has been reserved for audit.
8 Contractual services for the project's coordinator, administrative/financial assistant, a total of $40,000 of GEF funds, supplemented by UNDP funding. UNDP will provide $80,000 toward contractual services for the project's coordinator and administrative/financial assistant
9 An amount of $7,500 has been provided to acquire information technology, communication and audio-visual equipment, etc.
10 Direct Project Costs: for services rendered by UNDP to the project, according to the Letter of Agreement (Annex G). DPC are the costs of administrative services (such as those related to human resources, procurement, finance, and other functions) provided by UNDP in relation to the project. Direct project costs will be charged based on the UNDP Universal Price List or the actual corresponding service cost, in line with GEF rules on DPCs. The amounts indicated here are estimations. DPCs will be detailed as part of the annual project operational planning process and included in the yearly budgets. DPC costs can only be used for operational cost per transaction. DPCs are not a flat fee
UNDP Direct Project Services as requested by Government (if any): The UNDP, as GEF Agency for this project, will provide project management cycle services for the project as defined by the GEF Council. In addition the Government of Algeria may request UNDP direct services for specific projects, according to its policies and convenience. The UNDP and Government of Algeria acknowledge and agree that those services are not mandatory, and will be provided only upon Government request. If requested the services would follow the UNDP policies on the recovery of direct costs. These services (and their costs) are specified in the Letter of Agreement (Annex G). As is determined by the GEF Council requirements, these service costs will be assigned as Project Management Cost, duly identified in the project budget as Direct Project Costs. Eligible Direct Project Costs should not be charged as a flat percentage. They should be calculated on the basis of estimated actual or transaction based costs and should be charged to the direct project costs account codes: “64397- Direct Project Costs – Staff” and “74596-Direct Project Costs – General Operating Expenses (GOE)”.
Budget Revision and Tolerance: As per UNDP requirements outlined in the UNDP POPP, the project board will agree on a budget tolerance level for each plan under the overall annual work plan allowing the project manager to expend up to the tolerance level beyond the approved project budget amount for the year without requiring a revision from the Project Board. Should the following deviations occur, the Project Manager and UNDP Country Office will seek the approval of the UNDP-GEF team as these are considered major amendments by the GEF: a) Budget re-allocations among components in the project with amounts involving 10% of the total project grant or more; b) Introduction of new budget items/or components that exceed 5% of original GEF allocation.
Any over expenditure incurred beyond the available GEF grant amount will be absorbed by non-GEF resources (e.g. UNDP TRAC or cash co-financing).
Refund to Donor: Should a refund of unspent funds to the GEF be necessary, this will be managed directly by the UNDP-GEF Unit in New York.
Page | 46
Project Closure: Project closure will be conducted as per UNDP requirements outlined in the UNDP POPP.10 On an exceptional basis only, a no-cost extension beyond the initial duration of the project will be sought from in-country UNDP colleagues and then the UNDP-GEF Executive Coordinator.
Operational completion: The project will be operationally completed when the last UNDP-financed inputs have been provided and the related activities have been completed. This includes the final clearance of the Terminal Evaluation Report (that will be available in English) and the corresponding management response, and the end-of-project review Project Board meeting. The Implementing Partner through a Project Board decision will notify the UNDP Country Office when operational closure has been completed. At this time, the relevant parties will have already agreed and confirmed in writing on the arrangements for the disposal of any equipment that is still the property of UNDP.
Transfer or disposal of assets: In consultation with the NIM Implementing Partner and other parties of the project, UNDP programme manager (UNDP Resident Representative) is responsible for deciding on the transfer or other disposal of assets. Transfer or disposal of assets is recommended to be reviewed and endorsed by the project board following UNDP rules and regulations. Assets may be transferred to the government for project activities managed by a national institution at any time during the life of a project. In all cases of transfer, a transfer document must be prepared and kept on file11.
Financial completion: The project will be financially closed when the following conditions have been met: a) The project is operationally completed or has been cancelled; b) The Implementing Partner has reported all financial transactions to UNDP; c) UNDP has closed the accounts for the project; d) UNDP and the Implementing Partner have certified a final Combined Delivery Report (which serves as final budget revision).
The project will be financially completed within 12 months of operational closure or after the date of cancellation. Between operational and financial closure, the implementing partner will identify and settle all financial obligations and prepare a final expenditure report. The UNDP Country Office will send the final signed closure documents including confirmation of final cumulative expenditure and unspent balance to the UNDP-GEF Unit for confirmation before the project will be financially closed in Atlas by the UNDP Country Office.
10 see https://info.undp.org/global/popp/ppm/Pages/Closing-a-Project.aspx11 See https://popp.undp.org/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=/UNDP_POPP_DOCUMENT_LIBRARY/Public/PPM_Project%20Management_Closing.docx&action=default.
Page | 47
VI. GOVERNANCE AND MANAGEMENT ARRANGEMENTS Roles and responsibilities of the project’s governance mechanism: The project will be implemented following UNDP’s national implementation modality, according to the Standard Basic Assistance Agreement between UNDP and the Government of Algeria, and the Country Programme.
The Implementing Partner for this project is the Department of climate change (DCC) of the Ministry of Environment and renewable energy and the department of Multilateral Relations at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.. The Implementing Partner is responsible and accountable for managing this project, including the monitoring and evaluation of project interventions, achieving project outcomes, and for the effective use of UNDP resources.
The Implementing Partner is responsible for: Approving and signing the multiyear workplan; Approving and signing the combined delivery report at the end of the year; and, Signing the financial report or the funding authorization and certificate of expenditures.
The project organisation structure is as follows:
Page | 48
Tripartite (Outcome Board): An annual tripartite meeting, co-chaired by a representative of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Resident Representative of the UNDP (or their representative), where a representative of the MEER, other than the National Project Director (NPD) and member of the project steering committee, will participate. The tripartite meeting shall be held at least once per year and as needed, in order to evaluate the results and impact of the project. This meeting will allow the participating members to follow the progress of the project, to agree to corrective measures required, as well as general and strategic direction to align the project with national priorities in order to increase efficacy and efficiency.
Page | 49
Steering Committee (Project Board): Project monitoring activities are the responsibility of the Project Steering Committee (SC), whose annual meetings will be co-chaired by a senior MEER official other than the NPD and the Resident Representative of UNDP (or his/her representative). It shall be set up at the project’s launch in order to support the project’s decision-making body. The SC will provide the project with strategic guidance and supervise its execution according to the annual work plan. The SC is constituted of The National Climate Committee (CNC) representatives from the ministries of: MAE, , MICLAT, MdE, MIM, MRE, MADRP, MEN, MESRS and CNES (Beneficiaries), MEER (Executive) and UNDP (Supplier).. It could be extended to other sectors depending on the needs of the project.
The SC shall meet at least once a year, and the Project Management Unit (PMU) shall act as the secretariat for the project. The SC is responsible for taking decisions on the project’s management, including prior approval of work plans, the budget, project revisions, and key objectives, which must receive final UNDP approval through the UNDP-GEF Regional Coordinating Unit. The SC shall also provide guidance on the project’s technical feasibility and must: 1) ensure coordination with relevant government agencies; 2) lead the program’s implementation process and synchronize the project with national and local planning processes and policies; 3) monitor the work done by executing units, follow up on progress made and validates intermediary deliverables and final deliverables (national inventory, TNC, BUR1), 4) oversee the effectiveness of the project’s execution.
Project Manager (National Project Director): The National Project Director (or Project Manager) has the authority to run the project on a day-to-day basis on behalf of the Project Board within the constraints laid down by the Board. The Project Manager is responsible for day-to-day management and decision-making for the project. The Project Manager’s prime responsibility is to ensure that the project produces the results specified in the project document, to the required standard of quality and within the specified constraints of time and cost. The Project Manager will lead the Project Management Unit (PMU).
In addition, the NPD will coordinate directly with UNDP and hold a monthly meeting for regular monitoring of planned activities and associated budgets elaborated in the project’s annual work plan. The NPD may manage the project on behalf of the PSC and will be responsible for decision-making and daily project management. The NPD shall 1) ensure that the overall project management and monitoring is consistent with UNDP rules on managing UNDP/GEF projects; 2) facilitate communication and networking among PMU and technical implementation partners; and 3) organize PSC meetings.
The Implementing Partner appoints the Project Manager, who should be different from the Implementing Partner’s representative in the Project Board.
Specific responsibilities include:
Provide direction and guidance to project team(s)/ responsible party (ies); Liaise with the Project Board to assure the overall direction and integrity of the project; Identify and obtain any support and advice required for the management, planning and
control of the project; Responsible for project administration; Plan the activities of the project and monitor progress against the project results
framework and the approved annual workplan;
Page | 50
Mobilize personnel, goods and services, training and micro-capital grants to initiative activities, including drafting terms of reference and work specifications, and overseeing all contractors’ work;
Monitor events as determined in the project monitoring schedule plan/timetable, and update the plan as required;
Manage requests for the provision of financial resources by UNDP, through advance of funds, direct payments or reimbursement using the fund authorization and certificate of expenditures;
Monitor financial resources and accounting to ensure the accuracy and reliability of financial reports;
Be responsible for preparing and submitting financial reports to UNDP on a quarterly basis;
Manage and monitor the project risks initially identified and submit new risks to the project board for consideration and decision on possible actions if required; update the status of these risks by maintaining the project risks log;
Capture lessons learned during project implementation; Prepare the annual workplan for the following year; and update the Atlas Project
Management module if external access is made available. prepare the AWP for the following year.
Project Management Unit: The Administrative management of the project is ensured by the Project Management Unit (PMU), which is a team comprised of the National Project Director, a national project coordinator and an administrative and financial assistant.
The National Project Director (DNP) is designated by the Ministry of the Environment and Renewable Energies. She/He leads the mission and all the tasks assigned to it him/her in close consultation with the National Focal Point of the UNFCCC at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The NPD is responsible for the central management of the project and for ensuring the submission of the expected results of the project.
The recruitment of the National Coordinator and the Administrative and Financial Assistant will be done in accordance with the national execution rules and procedures of UNDP.
The PMU is responsible for the overall coordination and implementation of the project. The main responsibilities include especially national and local coordination with all stakeholders, financial management, monitoring, communication and knowledge management, selection and supervision of consultants and national implementing organisms and societies, and of service providers.
The main responsibilities of the PMU are:
- Ensure all administrative tasks of the project;
- Ensure the management and supervision of the project;
- Elaboration of Terms of Reference for the launching of specific studies or activities related to the achievement of project results;
- Communicate and coordinate between working groups and all project partners
- Identification and selection of consultants;
Page | 51
- Identify and involve the key actors for the implementation of the project;
- Animate the meetings, working sessions and necessary workshops at the national and regional level for the accompaniment of the participatory process of project realization;
- Ensure a good allocation of financial resources and signing of the markets and the provision of services;
- Ensure the monitoring and the evaluation of the project;
- Support for the evaluation of deliverables for studies carried out under the project;
- Prepare quarterly and annual progress reports
Page | 52
Technical Operational Committee: In order to ensure adequate implementation of project activities, the technical operational Committee (COT), composed of the national project coordinator; of all coordinating experts of the thematic groups; The National Greenhouse Gas Inventory Coordinator; And the Director General of ANCC; ensure the coordination, communication and exchange between the different working groups and monitoring the implementation of project activities.
The National Climate Change Agency (ANCC) participates in the realization of the project activities with the experts’ framing and benefits from all the capacity building activities of the project. The ANCC is implicated totally in the direct implementation of the TNC and BUR1 project with the support of a national expert, the National Project Coordinator (CNP), and a team of four national experts in inventory, vulnerability and adaptation, mitigation and national circumstances.
The ANCC is charged for managing all aspects of the development of project activities, establishing the overall project implementation schedule, providing technical and logistical support to all working groups and project teams under the management of the steering committee. It prepares quarterly and annual reports of the project.
The ANCC is under the authority of the director general, assisted by an adjunct Director General. It comprises of four (04) departments: the department of studies and synthesis; the inventory and data base department; the information and awareness department; and the department of administration and finance. Within its departments there are services in charge of the: adaptation, vulnerability, mitigation, national context and other information.
The ANCC GHG inventory department pilots the compilation of the national greenhouse gas inventory with the assistance of a national expert in greenhouse gas inventories. This department is charged for compiling the national inventory and ensures the quality control of the inventory.
The inventories of the five sectors (according to IPCC 2006) are piloted by the following organizations:
Energy: Sub-Directorate of Statistics and Energy Balance, Ministry of Energy
- Waste: AND
- Forests: DGF
- Agriculture: INRAA
- Industry: CNTPP
Each GHG Inventory Pilot organism formalizes its relationships with inventory data providers by the establishment of convention to ensure its supply of data and information according to a timetable and protocol previously established in accordance with the GHG inventory methodology, IPCC (2006). Depending on the size of the enterprises or sub-sectors and their data processing or emission calculation capabilities, the sector inventory pilot entity sets the type of data and format to be received from sources GHG emissions or inventory data providers.
The vulnerability, adaptation and mitigation and the national context services of ANCC ensure the monitoring and synthesis of the work of the four permanent working groups created for this purpose.
Page | 53
Each group is coordinated by a national expert and is made up of representatives of the sectors and institutions concerned (ministries, agencies, societies, administrations), researchers, academics, specialists, experts and members of civil society. The composition of each group must consider balancing it of gender (man-woman).
The thematic group is organized to contribute to the synthesis studies, to initiate studies by drawing up the terms of reference, to produce reports which feed the third national communication (TNC), the updated biennial report (BUR1) And other reports or studies required by the Government for the implementation of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
The working group is permanent with a limited number but may call upon any competent person who can contribute to the achievement of its objectives.
The thematic group is organized to contribute to a realization of the synthesis studies, to initiate studies by drawing up the terms of reference, to a production of reports which feed the third national communication (TNC), the biennial updated report (BUR1) and other reports or studies required by the Government for the implementation of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
The working group is permanent with a limited number but may call upon any competent person who can contribute to the achievement of its objectives.
These permanent thematic working groups also serve as a link between their institutions and the project. They ensure, in particular, the collection of data as well as the treatment and analyze data and information on project activities. Similarly, its members are committed to disseminating the results of the project work in their respective departments and institutions.
The coordinator of each thematic group is a member of the technical operational Committee (COT) of the project.
The project will also call upon other international and national expertise to meet specific needs.
This device is set up with the active participation of all sectors but assisted by national experts to ensure the training and capacity building of the members of the thematic group and to ensure the implementation of project of the TNC and BUR1. It is also expected at the end of the process the transfer knowledge and know-how to all and an exchange of experiences between the different working groups. The ANCC structures will be strengthened by this exercise and can capitalize this experience to ensure the continuity of the process.
Project Assurance: UNDP provides a three – tier supervision, oversight and quality assurance role – funded by the GEF agency fee – involving UNDP staff in Country Offices and at regional and headquarters levels. Project Assurance must be totally independent of the Project Management function. The quality assurance role supports the Project Board and Project Management Unit by carrying out objective and independent project oversight and monitoring functions. This role ensures appropriate project management milestones are managed and completed. The Project Board cannot delegate any of its quality assurance responsibilities to the Project Manager. This project oversight and quality assurance role is covered by the GEF Agency.
UNDP, the implementing agency of the GEF, shall designate, a Programme Officer who will be responsible for the project quality assurance. It will ensure regular monitoring of the project and
Page | 54
ANCCNational Compiler
Inventory
National GHG Inventory Department
(National Inventory Expert)
AgricultureSector
WasteSector IPPU
Sector EnergySector
- CERIST- Universities- Research laboratories- Research Centers- Thematic research - agencies
MoES/D statistics and energy balance
INRAA AND CNTPP
ForestSector
DGF
Data SourcesActivity Data, emission factors, emissions, informations, ............
Industry ExpertNational and International
Experts
- National Office of - Statistics
- National Center for - Informatics and - Customs Statistics - (NCICS)
Climate Change Division
MEE
R
CNC
MAE
UNFCCC-NFP
Waste Expert Agriculture ExpertEnergy Expert Forest Expert
ANCCScientific Committee
will bring to the project management unit the necessary administrative and technical support in the daily management of the project.Governance role for project target groups: All target groups are represented their representatives in the CNC which is in charge of the management of the project taking all decisions to its implementation.
Agreement on intellectual property rights and use of logo on the project’s deliverables and disclosure of information: In order to accord proper acknowledgement to the GEF for providing grant funding, the GEF logo will appear together with the UNDP logo on all promotional materials, other written materials like publications developed by the project, and project hardware. Any citation on publications regarding projects funded by the GEF will also accord proper acknowledgement to the GEF. Information will be disclosed in accordance with relevant policies notably the UNDP Disclosure Policy12 and the GEF policy on public involvement13.
Project management: The project will be operationalized in Algiers at the Ministry of Environment and Renewable Energy in three offices shared with the ANCC.
Institutional arrangements of the national greenhouse gas emission inventory system
12 See http://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/operations/transparency/information_disclosurepolicy/13 See https://www.thegef.org/gef/policies_guidelines
Page | 55
VII. MONITORING FRAMEWORK AND EVALUATION
The project results as outlined in the project results framework will be monitored annually and evaluated periodically during project implementation to ensure the project effectively achieves these results.
Project-level monitoring and evaluation will be undertaken in compliance with UNDP requirements as outlined in the UNDP POPP and UNDP Evaluation Policy . While these UNDP requirements are not outlined in this project document, the UNDP Country Office will work with the relevant project stakeholders to ensure UNDP M&E requirements are met in a timely fashion and to high quality standards. Additional mandatory GEF-specific M&E requirements (as outlined below) will be undertaken in accordance with the GEF M&E policy and other relevant GEF policies14.
In addition to these mandatory UNDP and GEF M&E requirements, other M&E activities deemed necessary to support project-level adaptive management will be agreed during the Project Inception Workshop and will be detailed in the Inception Report. This will include the exact role of project target groups and other stakeholders in project M&E activities including the GEF Operational Focal Point and national/regional institutes assigned to undertake project monitoring. The GEF Operational Focal Point will strive to ensure consistency in the approach taken to the GEF-specific M&E requirements across all GEF-financed projects in the country.
M&E Oversight and monitoring responsibilities:
Project Manager: The Project Manager is responsible for day-to-day project management and regular monitoring of project results and risks, including social and environmental risks. The Project Manager will ensure that all project staff maintain a high level of transparency, responsibility and accountability in M&E and reporting of project results. The Project Manager will inform the Project Board, the UNDP Country Office and the UNDP-GEF RTA of any delays or difficulties as they arise during implementation so that appropriate support and corrective measures can be adopted.
The Project Manager will develop annual work plans based on the multi-year work plan included in Annex A, including annual output targets to support the efficient implementation of the project. The Project Manager will ensure that the standard UNDP and GEF M&E requirements are fulfilled to the highest quality. This includes, but is not limited to, ensuring the results framework indicators are monitored annually and provided to the UNDP Country Office for recording in the UNDP web-based monitoring tools, and that the monitoring of risks and the various plans/strategies developed to support project implementation (e.g. gender strategy, KM strategy etc..) occur on a regular basis.
Project Board: The Project Board will take corrective action as needed to ensure the project achieves the desired results. The Project Board will hold project reviews to assess the performance of the project and appraise the Annual Work Plan for the following year. In the project’s final year, the Project Board will hold an end-of-project review to capture lessons learned and discuss opportunities for scaling up and to highlight project results and lessons learned with relevant audiences. This final review meeting will also discuss the findings outlined in the End of project report.14 See https://www.thegef.org/gef/policies_guidelines
Page | 56
Project Implementing Partner: The Implementing Partner is responsible for providing any and all required information and data necessary for timely, comprehensive and evidence-based project reporting, including results and financial data, as necessary and appropriate. The Implementing Partner will strive to ensure project-level M&E is undertaken by national institutes, and is aligned with national systems so that the data used by and generated by the project supports national systems.
UNDP Country Office: The UNDP Country Office will support the Project Manager as needed, including through annual supervision missions. The annual supervision missions will take place according to the schedule outlined in the annual work plan. Supervision mission reports will be circulated to the project team and Project Board within one month of the mission. The UNDP Country Office will initiate and organize key GEF M&E activities. The UNDP Country Office will also ensure that the standard UNDP and GEF M&E requirements are fulfilled to the highest quality.
The UNDP Country Office is responsible for complying with all UNDP project-level M&E requirements as outlined in the UNDP POPP . This includes ensuring the UNDP Quality Assurance Assessment during implementation is undertaken annually; that annual targets at the output level are developed, and monitored and reported using UNDP corporate systems; the regular updating of the ATLAS risk log; and, the updating of the UNDP gender marker on an annual basis based on gender mainstreaming progress reported in the UNDP ROAR. Any quality concerns flagged during these M&E activities must be addressed by the UNDP Country Office and the Project Manager.
The UNDP Country Office will retain all M&E records for this project for up to seven years after project financial closure in order to support ex-post evaluations undertaken by the UNDP Independent Evaluation Office (IEO) and/or the GEF Independent Evaluation Office (IEO).
UNDP-GEF Unit: Additional M&E and implementation quality assurance and troubleshooting support will be provided by the UNDP-GEF Regional Technical Advisor and the UNDP-GEF Directorate as needed.
Audit: The project will be audited according to UNDP Financial Regulations and Rules and applicable audit policies on NIM implemented projects.15
Additional GEF monitoring and reporting requirements:
Inception Workshop and Report: A project inception workshop will be held within two months after the project document has been signed by all relevant parties to, amongst others:
a) Re-orient project stakeholders to the project strategy and discuss any changes in the overall context that influence project strategy and implementation;
b) Discuss the roles and responsibilities of the project team, including reporting and communication lines and conflict resolution mechanisms;
c) Review the results framework and finalize the indicators, means of verification and monitoring plan; 15 See guidance here: https://info.undp.org/global/popp/frm/pages/financial-management-and-execution-modalities.aspx
Page | 57
d) Discuss reporting, monitoring and evaluation roles and responsibilities and finalize the M&E budget; identify national/regional institutes to be involved in project-level M&E; discuss the role of the GEF OFP in M&E;
e) Update and review responsibilities for monitoring the various project plans and strategies, including the risk log; Environmental and Social Management Plan and other safeguard requirements; the gender strategy; the knowledge management strategy, and other relevant strategies;
f) Review financial reporting procedures and mandatory requirements, and agree on the arrangements for the audit; and
g) Plan and schedule Project Board meetings and finalize the first year annual work plan.
The Project Manager will prepare the inception report no later than one month after the inception workshop. The inception report will be prepared in one of the official UN languages, duly signed by designated persons, cleared by the UNDP Country Office and the UNDP-GEF Regional Technical Adviser, and will be approved by the Project Board.
Annual progress: Status Survey Questionnaires to indicate progress and identify bottlenecks as well as technical support needs will be carried out once a year, in line with GEF and UNFCCC reporting requirements for NCs and BURs.
Lessons learned and knowledge generation: Results from the project will be disseminated within and beyond the project intervention area through existing information sharing networks and forums. The project will identify and participate, as relevant and appropriate, in scientific, policy-based and/or any other networks, which may be of benefit to the project. The project will identify, analyze and share lessons learned that might be beneficial to the design and implementation of similar projects and disseminate these lessons widely. There will be continuous information exchange between this project and other projects of similar focus in the same country, region and globally.
End of Project: During the last three months, the project team will prepare the Project Terminal Report (Annex H). This comprehensive report will summarize the results achieved (objectives, outcomes, outputs), lessons learned, problems met and areas where results may not have been achieved. It will also lay out recommendations for any further steps that may need to be taken to ensure sustainability and replicability of the project’s results. The Project Terminal Report shall be discussed with the Project Board during an end-of-project review meeting to discuss lesson learned and opportunities for scaling up.
M & E Workplan and budget
Page | 58
GEF M&E requirements Primary responsibility
Indicative costs to be charged to the Project Budget16 (US$) Time frame
GEF grant Co-financing
Inception Workshop UNDP Country Office USD 10,000 USD 5,000
Within two months of project document signature
Inception Report Project Manager None NoneWithin two weeks of inception workshop
Standard UNDP monitoring and reporting requirements as outlined in the UNDP POPP
UNDP Country Office None None Quarterly,
annually
Monitoring of indicators in project results framework Project Manager
None for time of project manager and UNDP CO
None Annually
GEF Project Implementation Report (PIR)
Project Manager and UNDP Country Office and UNDP-GEF team
None NoneAnnually. Not applicable for EAs.
NIM Audit as per UNDP audit policies
UNDP Country Office
Per year: USD 4,000 x 4 = 16,000
None
Annually or other frequency as per UNDP Audit policies
Lessons learned and knowledge generation Project Manager USD 3000 USD 5000 Annually
Monitoring of environmental and social risks, and corresponding management plans as relevant
Project Manager
UNDP CONone None Exempt
Addressing environmental and social grievances
Project Manager
UNDP Country Office BPPS as needed
None for time of project manager, and UNDP CO
None
Costs associated with missions, workshops, BPPS expertise etc. can be charged to the project budget.
Project Board meetings Project Board
UNDP Country
USD 2000 USD 2000 At minimum annually
16 Excluding project team staff time and UNDP staff time and travel expenses.
Page | 59
GEF M&E requirements Primary responsibility
Indicative costs to be charged to the Project Budget (US$) Time frame
GEF grant Co-financing
Office
Project Manager
Supervision missions UNDP Country Office None17 None Annually
Oversight missions UNDP-GEF team None12 None Troubleshooting as needed
Knowledge management Project Manager
None for time of project manager, and UNDP CO
None On-going
GEF Secretariat learning missions/site visits
UNDP Country Office and Project Manager and UNDP-GEF team
None None To be determined.
Project Terminal Report Project manager
and team
UNDP COUSD 2000 None
At least three months before the end of the project
TOTAL indicative COST
Excluding project team staff time, and UNDP staff and travel expenses
USD 33,000 USD 20,000
17 The costs of UNDP Country Office and UNDP-GEF Unit’s participation and time are charged to the GEF Agency Fee.
Page | 60
VIII. LEGAL CONTEXT
This project document shall be the instrument referred to as such in Article 1 of the Standard Basic Assistance Agreement between the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and UNDP signed on 20th of July, 1977. All references in the SBAA to “Executing Agency” shall be deemed to refer to “Implementing Partner.”
This project will be implemented by the Ministry of Environment and Renewable Energy (“Implementing Partner”) in accordance with its financial regulations, rules, practices and procedures only to the extent that they do not contravene the principles of the Financial Regulations and Rules of UNDP. Where the financial governance of an Implementing Partner does not provide the required guidance to ensure best value for money, fairness, integrity, transparency, and effective international competition, the financial governance of UNDP shall apply.
Any designations on maps or other references employed in this project document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNDP concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
IX. RISK MANAGEMENT
Government Entity (NIM)
Consistent with the Article III of the SBAA, the responsibility for the safety and security of the Implementing Partner and its personnel and property, and of UNDP’s property in the Implementing Partner’s custody, rests with the Implementing Partner. To this end, the Implementing Partner shall:
a) put in place an appropriate security plan and maintain the security plan, taking into account the security situation in the country where the project is being carried;
b) assume all risks and liabilities related to the Implementing Partner’s security, and the full implementation of the security plan.
UNDP reserves the right to verify whether such a plan is in place, and to suggest modifications to the plan when necessary. Failure to maintain and implement an appropriate security plan as required hereunder shall be deemed a breach of the Implementing Partner’s obligations under this Project Document.
The Implementing Partner agrees to undertake all reasonable efforts to ensure that no UNDP funds received pursuant to the Project Document are used to provide support to individuals or entities associated with terrorism and that the recipients of any amounts provided by UNDP hereunder do not appear on the list maintained by the Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolution 1267 (1999). The list can be accessed via http://www.un.org/sc/committees/1267/aq_sanctions_list.shtml.
Page | 61
Social and environmental sustainability will be enhanced through application of the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (http://www.undp.org/ses) and related Accountability Mechanism (http://www.undp.org/secu-srm).
The Implementing Partner shall: (a) conduct project and programme-related activities in a manner consistent with the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards, (b) implement any management or mitigation plan prepared for the project or programme to comply with such standards, and (c) engage in a constructive and timely manner to address any concerns and complaints raised through the Accountability Mechanism. UNDP will seek to ensure that communities and other project stakeholders are informed of and have access to the Accountability Mechanism.
All signatories to the Project Document shall cooperate in good faith with any exercise to evaluate any programme or project-related commitments or compliance with the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards. This includes providing access to project sites, relevant personnel, information, and documentation.
The current project is excluded from UNDP Social and Environmental Screening Procedure (SESP) requirement. Since March 1, 2016, UNDP has expanded the list of risk-based exemption criteria for its to include the preparation and dissemination of reports, documents and communication materials.
The Implementing Partner will take appropriate steps to prevent misuse of funds, fraud or corruption, by its officials, consultants, responsible parties, subcontractors and sub-recipients in implementing the project or using UNDP funds. The Implementing Partner will ensure that its financial management, anti-corruption and anti-fraud policies are in place and enforced for all funding received from or through UNDP.
The requirements of the following documents, then in force at the time of signature of the Project Document, apply to the Implementing Partner: (a) UNDP Policy on Fraud and other Corrupt Practices and (b) UNDP Office of Audit and Investigations Investigation Guidelines. The Implementing Partner agrees to the requirements of the above documents, which are an integral part of this Project Document and are available online at www.undp.org.
In the event that an investigation is required, UNDP has the obligation to conduct investigations relating to any aspect of UNDP projects and programs. The Implementing Partner shall provide its full cooperation, including making available personnel, relevant documentation, and granting access to the Implementing Partner’s (and its consultants’, responsible parties’, subcontractors’ and sub-recipients’) premises, for such purposes at reasonable times and on reasonable conditions as may be required for the purpose of an investigation. Should there be a limitation in meeting this obligation, UNDP shall consult with the Implementing Partner to find a solution.
The signatories to this Project Document will promptly inform one another in case of any incidence of inappropriate use of funds, or credible allegation of fraud or corruption with due confidentiality.
Where the Implementing Partner becomes aware that a UNDP project or activity, in whole or in part, is the focus of investigation for alleged fraud/corruption, the Implementing Partner will inform the UNDP Resident Representative/Head of Office, who will promptly inform UNDP’s Office of Audit and Investigations (OAI). The Implementing Partner shall provide regular
Page | 62
updates to the head of UNDP in the country and OAI of the status of, and actions relating to, such investigation.
UNDP shall be entitled to a refund from the Implementing Partner of any funds provided that have been used inappropriately, including through fraud or corruption, or otherwise paid other than in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Project Document. Such amount may be deducted by UNDP from any payment due to the Implementing Partner under this or any other agreement.
Where such funds have not been refunded to UNDP, the Implementing Partner agrees that donors to UNDP (including the Government) whose funding is the source, in whole or in part, of the funds for the activities under this Project Document, may seek recourse to the Implementing Partner for the recovery of any funds determined by UNDP to have been used inappropriately, including through fraud or corruption, or otherwise paid other than in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Project Document.
Note: The term “Project Document” as used in this clause shall be deemed to include any relevant subsidiary agreement further to the Project Document, including those with responsible parties, subcontractors and sub-recipients.
Each contract issued by the Implementing Partner in connection with this Project Document shall include a provision representing that no fees, gratuities, rebates, gifts, commissions or other payments, other than those shown in the proposal, have been given, received, or promised in connection with the selection process or in contract execution, and that the recipient of funds from the Implementing Partner shall cooperate with any and all investigations and post-payment audits.
Should UNDP refer to the relevant national authorities for appropriate legal action any alleged wrongdoing relating to the project, the Government will ensure that the relevant national authorities shall actively investigate the same and take appropriate legal action against all individuals found to have participated in the wrongdoing, recover and return any recovered funds to UNDP.
The Implementing Partner shall ensure that all of its obligations set forth under this section entitled “Risk Management” are passed on to each responsible party, subcontractor and sub-recipient and that all the clauses under this section entitled “Risk Management Standard Clauses” are included, mutatis mutandis, in all sub-contracts or sub-agreements entered into further to this Project Document.
Page | 63
X. MANDATORY ANNEXES
A. Working plan and deliverables scheduleB. Terms of Reference for Project StaffC. UNDP Social and Environmental and Social Screening Template (SESP)D. UNDP Project Quality Assurance Report (to be completed by UNDP Country Office) E. UNDP Risk Log (to be completed by UNDP Country Office)F. Results of the capacity assessment of the project implementing partner and HACT micro
assessment (to be completed by UNDP Country Office) G. Standard letter of agreement between UNDP and the government for the provision of
support servicesH. Final report of Algeria National Communication’s / Biennial Update Report’s project I. OFP Letter of Endorsement
Page | 64
Annex A. Working plan and deliverables schedule
A1. Multi Year Work Plan
ActivityYear 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4
Q1 Q2 Q
3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q
7 Q8 Q9 Q10 Q11 Q1
2 Q13 Q14 Q15 Q16
Institutional and organizational arrangements of the projectInstitutional arrangements and launch of TNC and BUR 11. Recruitment of the National Project Coordinator
2. Setup of technical expert teams3. Organization of a workshop to launch the TNC and
BUR 1 project4. Preparation of ToRs for working groups
5. Revision and validation of the planning and means of carrying out the project
Objective 1 Greenhouse gas (GHG) inventory system and MRV (Measurement, Reporting and Verification)Output 1.1: National GHG inventory updated and capacity to collect this information on an ongoing basis enhanced
1. GHG inventory for period of: BUR 2017-2018; TNC 2001-2020 prepared using 2006 IPCC guidelines; for the following sectors: Energy, IPPU (Industrial processes and product use), Agriculture, LUCF (Land Use Change and Forestry), waste.
2. Emissions and removals of GHG for the year 1994 and 2000 updated using 2006 IPCC guidelines and updated data
3. Process to collect and analyze GHG Inventory data developed and institutionalized within relevant agencies and ministries
4. GHG inventory team set up, training needs identified and capacities strengthened.
5. QA/QC (quality assurance/quality control) inventory plan developed, implemented and
Page | 65
applied on in a systematic way6. GHG Inventory data published, disseminated and
archived.Output 1.2: MRV for GHG Inventory developed and implemented
1. MRV system for the national GHG emissions inventory system developed
2. Key stakeholders trained in the implementation of the MRV system for the national inventory system
Objective 2: Mitigation actions and domestic MRVOutput 2.1: Mitigation actions and their effects reported and monitored, and capacity to collect and analyze this information on an ongoing basis strengthened
1. Assessment of capacity building needs for development and implementation of mitigation actions
2. Strengthening capacities of institutions, agencies and companies of key sectors for collection, analysis and reporting of data and information on mitigation actions, policies and measures at sectoral and local level
3. Strengthening capacities of national experts to analyze mitigation actions and measures and to estimate their effects and to develop mitigation scenarios for Algeria by 2030
4. Assessment of national policies, strategies and measures undertaken for GHG mitigation in key sectors and how mainstreaming mitigation in different institutions and agencies at national and local levels
5. Identification, collect and report of information and data on mitigation actions in key sectors: Energy, Industry, Transportation, building, waste and forestry
6. Identification of needs, gaps and constraints related to technical, financial and capacity building needs for development and implementation of mitigation actions
Page | 66
Output 2.2: Design of domestic Measurement, Reporting and Verification system supported1. Information and awareness of policy makers and
decision makers on MRV system2. Capacity building provided to institutions and
sectors, to experts and all stakeholders to implement MRV system on mitigation actions.
3. Development of methodologies and tools for MRV implementation on mitigation actions, and MRV best practices disseminated
4. MRV system mainstreamed among all institutions and agencies and implemented by all stakeholders
Objective 3: Assessment of vulnerability to climate change of key sectors and development of adaptation measuresOutput 3.1: Technical and scientific capacities of experts and stakeholders built and reinforced with tools and methods for modeling and analysis of vulnerability
to climate change and impacts for key sectors assessed and costs estimated (water, agriculture, forestry, health);
1. Capacity building provided to all staff and experts to reinforce their skills on vulnerability assessment to climate change and modeling
2. Selection of tools and methodologies and training of experts and all sectoral staff for their use to assess vulnerability to climate change
3. Updating climate medium and long-term scenarios using several regional climate models (RCMs) and projections of climate change of key sectors
4. Data collection and methodology identification to ensure a climate vulnerability assessment in key sectors: water, agriculture, forestry, and health
5. Data Analysis, modeling, and mapping of vulnerabilities to climate change and risks, including extreme weather events for key sectors
6. Analysis of vulnerability impacts and projections with cost estimation in different regions (tell, highlands, Sahara) for key sectors (water, forestry, agriculture, health.)
Output 3.2: National and sectoral adaptation capacities strengthened and adaptation policies and measures mainstreamed in national, local and sectoral territory management and planning processes, and adaptation actions disseminated
Page | 67
1. Information and awareness of policy makers and policy makers to climate change adaptation
2. Capacity of experts and sectoral staff reinforced to conduct assessment on adaptation measures and their implementation, report on implementation progress of adaptation measures
3. Mainstreaming and strengthening adaptation to climate change in current institutional and policy framework, in sectoral and local populations development planning processes
4. Development of adaptation measures portfolio to climate change adapted and gender sensitive for priority sectors (agriculture, forestry, health, water, coastal zones)
5. Cost-benefit analysis of adaptation measures and identification of investment needs
6. Dissemination of adaptation measures and archiving
Objective 4: National Circumstances, Institutional Arrangements, Constraints & Gaps, related financial, technical & capacity needs and Other relevant Information
Output 4.1: National Circumstances and institutional arrangements relevant to the preparation of the biennial update report and national communications updated1. Collection of information on new developments in
national Description of geographical and socio-economic (economy, education, population, health, livelihoods) characteristics, with gender disaggregated data wherever possible
2. Review and analysis of national development objectives, priorities and circumstances, and the specific needs and concerns arising from the climate change risks
3. Description of institutional arrangements relevant to the preparation of the national communications on a continuous basis including distribution of responsibilities within government departments, universities, research institutions, etc
Page | 68
4. Mechanisms for gender responsive stakeholder involvement, coordination and participation to enable the preparation of national communications and biennial update reports on a sustainable manner identified
Output 4.2: Constraints and gaps identified; financial, technology, policy and capacity building needs assessed and recommendation for addressing the needs provided
1. Technology, financial and capacity needs for mitigation assessed.
2. Review and assess constraints, gaps, technology, financial and capacity needs
3. Identify new constraints, gaps, technology, financial and capacity needs
4. Identify and propose solutions to the constraints, gaps, technology, financial and capacity needs
Output 4.3 Other information relevant for the preparation of BUR1 (First Biennial Update Report) and TNC consolidated
1. Review of national plans and programs relative to the systematic observation, to the climate research; and forecasting capacity.
2. Collection and analysis of women's contribution to mitigation and adaptation strategies, particularly in education, training, information, sensitization and energy use;
3. Identification and preparation of programs of needs, gaps and priorities in education, training, public awareness; and transfer of technology,
4. Other information relevant for the implementation of the climate change convention (UNFCCC)
Objective 5: Compilation of Third National Communication and First Biennial Update Report (BUR1), Monitoring and EvaluationOutput 5.1: BUR1 and TNC compiled, endorsed by the Government and submitted to UNFCCC
1. BUR1 compiled, translated, approved, disseminated and submitted to the UNFCCC
2. TNC compiled, translated, approved, disseminated and submitted to the UNFCCC
Page | 69
3. Synthesis reports and sensitization of decision makers and general public to the results of the TNC and BUR1
Output 5.2: Project regularly monitored, financial audit conducted and lessons learned compiled
1. Inception workshop, project board meetings and validation workshop held
2. Project financial and progress reports prepared and submitted.
3. End of project report and lessons learned compiled;
Page | 70
A2. Schedule of BUR1 and TNC deliverables and submission to UNFCCC
Content Year 1 + year 2 End of Year 2 Year 3 + Year 4 End of Year 4
National circumstances and institutional arrangements, MRV system
Report on national circumstances, national arrangements and MRV system developed up to 2020
To incorporate in BUR1
BUR1 submissionDecember
2020
Report on changes occurred since previous submission in national circumstances, institutional arrangements, MRV system implementation
To incorporate in SBUR
Compilation for TNC
TNC and SBUR Joint submissionSeptember 2022
Constraints and gaps, and related financial, technical and capacity needs, including support needed and received
Report information for the period up to 2020
To incorporate in BUR1
Report information for the period up to 2022
To incorporate in SBUR
Compilation for TNC
National GHG inventory
GHG inventory covering years 2017-2018
To include in BUR1
GHG inventory covering years 2019-2020
To incorporate in SBUR
Compilation for TNCGHG inventory covering
years 2001-2016 to be included in TNC
To include in TNC
GHG inventory covering years 1995-1999, updating for years 1994 and 2000
To include in TNC
Mitigation actions and their effects
Report covering mitigation actions implemented during last five years 2015-2020 Included in BUR1
To include in BUR1
Report covering mitigation actions implemented during years 2020-2022
To incorporate in SBUR Compilation for
TNC
Report covering mitigation actions implemented during last five years 2010-2014
To include in TNC
Report on effects of mitigation actions for period 2010-2020
To include in TNC
Compilation for TNC
Vulnerability and adaptation measures
Vulnerability assessment and adaptation actions covering the period 2010-2022
To include in TNC
Vulnerability assessment and adaptation actions covering the period 2010-2022
Compilation for TNC
Page | 71
A3. Technical components of the project proposal
Studies to be carried out in the framework of the third national communication on climate change
Impacts of climate change on water resources and adaptation
- Impacts of future climate change on ground and surface water resources and adaptation strategy to ensure water security.
- Impacts of future climate change on the capacity to regulate reservoir dams.
- Modeling and mapping of the erosion hazard of soils in watersheds in Algeria
- Model of hydro-economic analysis of the effects of climate change on water resources in Algeria.
- Vulnerability to climate change: case of the Hydrographic Basin-Oranie Chott Chergui.
Impacts of climate change on forests and adaptation
- Study of the vulnerability and adaptation of the cedraie to the BELEZMA National Park (Wilaya of Batna).
- Study of the vulnerability and adaptation of the Senalba forest (wilaya of Djelfa).
Vulnerability and adaptation of the agricultural sector
- Validation study of the IPCC climate change scenarios on the basis of a retrospective analysis of the previous climate series recorded in Algeria.
- Review of the implementation of the local climate plans defined in the framework of SNAT 2010: methodological approach and local actors.
- Study of the impacts of climate change on water availability and agricultural production.
- Studies of climate change adaptation strategies of the agricultural sector, for the sustainable use of water resources, taking into account extreme and plausible scenarios for the choice of planting dates; The increase and / or reduction of cultivated areas; The use of efficient irrigation systems; The application of deficit irrigation.
Climate Change Mitigation
• Housing sector
- Study of the uses of energy in the tertiary and residential sectors (household appliances) in the three bioclimatic stages in Algeria and identification of mitigation potential and actions.
- Analysis of the characteristics of the Algerian building by typology and evaluation of the reduction deposit by bioclimatic stage and type of housing.
- Study of the impact of the evolution of air conditioning in Algeria on energy demand. Identification of mitigation actions.
• Industry and mining SectorPage | 72
- Analysis of the mitigation potential of the public and private industrial sector in Algeria and identification of actions.
• Transportation sector
- Evaluation of the impacts of collective transport by Tram in the seven Algerian cities on greenhouse gas emissions and energy consumption.
- Analysis of the emission reduction potential in freight transport and logistics. Identification of mitigation actions greenhouse gas emissions.
- Study of emissions of the road transport sector in urban areas and identification of mitigation actions.
Page | 73
Annex B. Terms of Reference for Project Staff
B1. Terms of reference of the National Coordinator of TNC and BUR1 Project
Algeria is preparing the project document for the Third National Communication on Climate Change (TNC) and the updated biennial report (BUR1) with UNDP GEF support in the enabling activities. The initial communication was prepared and submitted on 30 April 2001 and the second communication on 25 November 2010.
In accordance with the operational organization of the project execution of TNC and BUR1, it is planned to recruit a national coordinator of the project of the TNC and BUR1. The National Project Coordinator (CNP) is responsible for day-to-day and full-time project management. Its main responsibility is to produce the results expected by the project and described in the project document, according to the quality standards required, and taking into account the specificities and constraints of time and cost.
The National Project Coordinator works under the direct supervision of the National Project Manager, and under the authority of the Steering Committee and according to the standards established by this Committee. It also works closely with the UNFCCC focal point, the UNDP Algiers office and the ministries involved in the project: MREE, ME and MIM and MF, etc.
The responsibilities of the National Project Coordinator (CNP) of TNC and BUR1 are:
- Supervise and ensure the execution of project activities as provided for in the work plan contained in the project document;
- Develop detailed programs for carrying out project activities with a timetable
- Prepare the terms of reference and any other documents necessary for the identification of experts, consultants and subcontractors as well as their recruitment (in consultation with the Project Steering Committee (PSC) and UNDP;
- Develop the structure and content of the Third National Communication and BUR1 document in consultation with all team members and work groups;
- Supervise the work of national consultants, as project support staff, recruited for technical assistance;
- Liaise with all stakeholders: institutions, ministries, organisms, universities, societies, NGOs, etc.
- Compile the contents of the BUR1 and TNC Global Report and the relevant sections, in consultation with the Team Coordinators;
- Coordinate with the Steering Committee of the project in order to ensure the overall coherence of the implementation of the project.
- Manage meetings of the Technical Operations Committee (TOC) of the project to facilitate communication and exchange between the various thematic groups and to monitor the completion of tasks;
- Control expenditure and ensure the proper management of the resources allocated to the project;
- Recapitulate and synthesize the results of the project;
Page | 74
- Supervise support staff, and consultants-experts recruited to provide technical assistance
- Identify and ensure the synergy of the TNC with the other projects, notably within the framework of the synergy between the three conventions
- Prepare, organize and supervise the workshops and training required during the implementation of the project to ensure their success
- Prepare periodic project progress reports with sectors and experts;
- Review the reports produced by each technical team and make comments to improve the content.
- Ensure that the TNC process is consistent with the guidance of the Conference of the Parties to the UNFCCC and contribute to the improvement of the UNFCCC reporting process.
- Finalize BUR1 and TNC with national experts.
Qualifications and Experience
- Hold a degree in higher education in the environment or in another equivalent discipline;
- Good control of Algeria's environmental problems, notably a good knowledge of atmospheric problems, greenhouse gas emissions from the energy, industrial, transport and waste sectors in Algeria;
- Have at least 15 years of experience in climate change and project activities directly related to project areas;
- Excellent communication skills (written and oral); And ability to work in a multidisciplinary environment, working in groups and managing teams
- Have a great command of the computer tools (Windows, Office), and audiovisual and communication means (internet, email, teleconference, etc.)
- Have a confirmed experience in project management, notably by objective and in the development of quantified results-based action plans;
- Have a good knowledge of the United Nations system, the public institutions and the Algerian administration;
- Have a good working experience with government structures at all levels, and work with the energy and Industry sectors; And public and private economic operators;
- Have a very good knowledge of the methodologies of sectoral inventories including that of the IPCC 2006 as well as the Guide to good practices,
- Good knowledge of international negotiations and processes under the UNFCCC;
- Have participated in the process of completing the initial communication, the second national communication is an asset.
- Have a good knowledge and experience of BUR.
- Very good knowledge of the English language (reading, spoken, written).
Page | 75
B2. Terms of reference of the administrative and financial assistant
The administrative and financial assistant is under the responsibility of the National Project Director and the National Coordinator of the TNC & BUR1 Project. It assists the Project Management Unit (UGP) in the management of all administrative and financial aspects of the project.
Responsibilities and Tasks
- Ensure overall monitoring of project expenditures through financial management tools and hold on to an updated expenditure matrix on all project activities
- Assist the UGP in the preparation of the annual budget and verify compliance with financial rules and spending procedures of the UNDP-GEF;
- Preparing budget revisions and financial adjustments
- Prepare and update the monitoring of project expenditures.
- Manage the collection, archiving and sending of the necessary supporting documents for financial monitoring
- Is in charge to set up and to maintain a system of management and archiving of the effective and efficient files up to date
- Assist the DNP and CNP in the various tasks related to the administrative and financial management of the project.
- Support to the current administrative management of the project
- Bring support within the framework of the organization and the current management of the project (organization of meetings, workshop, seminar, ensure the sending, receipt and distribution of various couriers in time ...)
- Ensure the management and follow-up of missions (reservations of airline tickets, hotels, restaurants, management of reception and transport, management of telephones...)
- Seize and / or get in shape reports of meetings or seminars and administrative documents (letters, reports, etc.), reproduce them and distribute them to the partners.
- Supervise the good functioning of the UGP office, ensuring that it is clean, hygienic and is a safe work environment for staff
- Responsible for purchasing office supplies and consumables and managing office expenses where applicable (paying bills of water, of energy, of telephone, etc.)
- Support the UGP for any other tasks necessary for the good execution of the project.
Qualifications and Experience
- Holder a license's degree in management (accounting, financial ...) or any equivalent diploma..
- Have at least 05 years of relevant experience in administrative and financial management
- Good knowledge of United Nations administrative and accounting procedures is an asset,
- Pack office: It is imperative that he master the office automation tools Excel, Power Point and Word, internet, e-mail, social media, etc.
Page | 76
- Excellent capacity of: organizational, communication and writing…
- Excellent mastery of French (written / oral).
- Experience into an international agency of cooperation or of the United Nations is an asset.
Professional skills and behaviors:
- Sense of organization
- Reliability, punctuality
- Ability to work in a team, under pressure
- Ability to produce quality results on time
- Professional ethics, respect for the confidentiality and the reserve necessary for the exercise of the function
Personal Attitudes
- Good communication skills
- Availability and discretion and flexibility of work schedules
- Sense of the initiative and anticipation.
Page | 77
Annex C. UNDP Social and Environmental and Social Screening (SESP) - Exempt
In line with the risk-based exemption criteria, this project is exempt from the SESP requirement, and therefore the SESP screening is not required.The project is an eligible activity under UNFCCC to report on climate change activities in Algeria to implement the UNFCCC. Therefore, there is no activity with any negative impact on environment or the society.
Page | 78
Annex D. UNDP Project Quality Assurance Report
PROJECT QA ASSESSMENT: DESIGN AND APPRAISALOVERALL PROJECT
EXEMPLARY (5)
HIGHLY SATISFACTORY (4)
SATISFACTORY (3)
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT (2)
INADEQUATE (1)
At least four criteria are rated Exemplary, and all criteria are rated High or Exemplary.
All criteria are rated Satisfactory or higher, and at least four criteria are rated High or Exemplary.
At least six criteria are rated Satisfactory or higher, and only one may be rated Needs Improvement. The SES criterion must be rated Satisfactory or above.
At least three criteria are rated Satisfactory or higher, and only four criteria may be rated Needs Improvement.
One or more criteria are rated Inadequate, or five or more criteria are rated Needs Improvement.
DECISION APPROVE – the project is of sufficient quality to continue as planned. Any management actions must be addressed in a timely
manner. APPROVE WITH QUALIFICATIONS – the project has issues that must be addressed before the project document can be approved.
Any management actions must be addressed in a timely manner. DISAPPROVE – the project has significant issues that should prevent the project from being approved as drafted.
RATING CRITERIA
STRATEGIC
1. Does the project’s Theory of Change specify how it will contribute to higher level change? (Select the option from 1-3 that best reflects the project): 3: The project has a theory of change with explicit assumptions and clear change pathway describing how the
project will contribute to outcome level change as specified in the programme/CPD, backed by credible evidence of what works effectively in this context. The project document clearly describes why the project’s strategy is the best approach at this point in time.
2: The project has a theory of change. It has an explicit change pathway that explains how the project intends to contribute to outcome-level change and why the project strategy is the best approach at this point in time, but is backed by limited evidence.
1: The project does not have a theory of change, but the project document may describe in generic terms how the project will contribute to development results, without specifying the key assumptions. It does not make an explicit link to the programme/CPD’s theory of change.
*Note: Management Action or strong management justification must be given for a score of 1
3 21
Evidence
2. Is the project aligned with the thematic focus of the UNDP Strategic Plan? (select the option from 1-3 that best reflects the project): 3: The project responds to one of the three areas of development work18 as specified in the Strategic Plan; it
addresses at least one of the proposed new and emerging areas19; an issues-based analysis has been
3 2
1Evidence
Project is
18 1. Sustainable development pathways; 2. Inclusive and effective democratic governance; 3. Resilience building19 sustainable production technologies, access to modern energy services and energy efficiency, natural resources management, extractive industries, urbanization, citizen security, social
Page | 79
PROJECT QA ASSESSMENT: DESIGN AND APPRAISALincorporated into the project design; and the project’s RRF includes all the relevant SP output indicators. (all must be true to select this option)
2: The project responds to one of the three areas of development work1 as specified in the Strategic Plan. The project’s RRF includes at least one SP output indicator, if relevant. (both must be true to select this option)
1: While the project may respond to one of the three areas of development work1 as specified in the Strategic Plan, it is based on a sectoral approach without addressing the complexity of the development issue. None of the relevant SP indicators are included in the RRF. This answer is also selected if the project does not respond to any of the three areas of development work in the Strategic Plan.
aligned with SP and RRF
includes relevant
indicators
RELEVANT
3. Does the project have strategies to effectively identify, engage and ensure the meaningful participation of targeted groups/geographic areas with a priority focus on the excluded and marginalized? (select the option from 1-3 that best reflects this project): 3: The target groups/geographic areas are appropriately specified, prioritising the excluded and/or marginalised.
Beneficiaries will be identified through a rigorous process based on evidence (if applicable.) The project has an explicit strategy to identify, engage and ensure the meaningful participation of specified target groups/geographic areas throughout the project, including through monitoring and decision-making (such as representation on the project board) (all must be true to select this option)
2: The target groups/geographic areas are appropriately specified, prioritising the excluded and/or marginalised. The project document states how beneficiaries will be identified, engaged and how meaningful participation will be ensured throughout the project. (both must be true to select this option)
1: The target groups/geographic areas are not specified, or do not prioritize excluded and/or marginalised populations. The project does not have a written strategy to identify or engage or ensure the meaningful participation of the target groups/geographic areas throughout the project.
*Note: Management Action must be taken for a score of 1, or select not applicable.
3 21
Select (all) targeted groups: (drop-down)Evidence
N/A for EA. Direct beneficiaries are government institutions
4. Have knowledge, good practices, and past lessons learned of UNDP and others informed the project design? (select the option from 1-3 that best reflects this project): 3: Knowledge and lessons learned (gained e.g. through peer assist sessions) backed by credible evidence from
evaluation, corporate policies/strategies, and monitoring have been explicitly used, with appropriate referencing, to develop the project’s theory of change and justify the approach used by the project over alternatives.
2: The project design mentions knowledge and lessons learned backed by evidence/sources, which inform the project’s theory of change but have not been used/are not sufficient to justify the approach selected over alternatives.
1: There is only scant or no mention of knowledge and lessons learned informing the project design. Any references that are made are not backed by evidence.
*Note: Management Action or strong management justification must be given for a score of 1
3 21
Evidence
FNC and SNC were
also prepared
with UNDP support and
lessons learned
from those projects
were embedded in project
design (i.e. better
integrating UNDP
experts into national
structures)
5. Does the project use gender analysis in the project design and does the project respond to this gender analysis with concrete measures to address gender inequities and empower women? (select the option from 1-3 that best reflects this project):
3 21
Evidence
protection, and risk management for resiliencePage | 80
PROJECT QA ASSESSMENT: DESIGN AND APPRAISAL 3: A participatory gender analysis on the project has been conducted. This analysis reflects on the different
needs, roles and access to/control over resources of women and men, and it is fully integrated into the project document. The project establishes concrete priorities to address gender inequalities in its strategy. The results framework includes outputs and activities that specifically respond to this gender analysis, with indicators that measure and monitor results contributing to gender equality. (all must be true to select this option)
2: A gender analysis on the project has been conducted. This analysis reflects on the different needs, roles and access to/control over resources of women and men. Gender concerns are integrated in the development challenge and strategy sections of the project document. The results framework includes outputs and activities that specifically respond to this gender analysis, with indicators that measure and monitor results contributing to gender equality. (all must be true to select this option)
1: The project design may or may not mention information and/or data on the differential impact of the project’s development situation on gender relations, women and men, but the constraints have not been clearly identified and interventions have not been considered.
*Note: Management Action or strong management justification must be given for a score of 1
No gender analysis carried
out.
Justification: Gender
analysis to be carried out during inception
phase
8. Does UNDP have a clear advantage to engage in the role envisioned by the project vis-à-vis national partners, other development partners, and other actors? (select from options 1-3 that best reflects this project): 3: An analysis has been conducted on the role of other partners in the area where the project intends to work,
and credible evidence supports the proposed engagement of UNDP and partners through the project. It is clear how results achieved by relevant partners will contribute to outcome level change complementing the project’s intended results. If relevant, options for south-south and triangular cooperation have been considered, as appropriate. (all must be true to select this option)
2: Some analysis has been conducted on the role of other partners where the project intends to work, and relatively limited evidence supports the proposed engagement of and division of labour between UNDP and partners through the project. Options for south-south and triangular cooperation may not have not been fully developed during project design, even if relevant opportunities have been identified.
1: No clear analysis has been conducted on the role of other partners in the area that the project intends to work, and relatively limited evidence supports the proposed engagement f UNDP and partners through the project. There is risk that the project overlaps and/or does not coordinate with partners’ interventions in this area. Options for south-south and triangular cooperation have not been considered, despite its potential relevance.
*Note: Management Action or strong management justification must be given for a score of1
3 21
Evidence
UNDP is supporting
the NC preparation for the 3rd
time; Project is
aligned with Strategic
Cooperation
Framework; UNDP has
comparative advantage
as GEF accredited entity with capacity to implement
such projects
SOCIAL & ENVIRONMENTAL STANDARDS
9. Does the project seek to further the realization of human rights using a human rights based approach? (select from options 1-3 that best reflects this project): 3: Credible evidence that the project aims to further the realization of human rights, upholding the relevant
international and national laws and standards in the area of the project. Any potential adverse impacts on enjoyment of human rights were rigorously identified and assessed as relevant, with appropriate mitigation and management measures incorporated into project design and budget. (all must be true to select this option)
2: Some evidence that the project aims to further the realization of human rights. Potential adverse impacts on enjoyment of human rights were identified and assessed as relevant, and appropriate mitigation and management measures incorporated into the project design and budget.
1: No evidence that the project aims to further the realization of human rights. Limited or no evidence that potential adverse impacts on enjoyment of human rights were considered.
*Note: Management action or strong management justification must be given for a score of 1
3 21
Evidence
The project is an EA under
UNFCCC, no activities should impact
negatively or positively
the enjoyment of human
Page | 81
PROJECT QA ASSESSMENT: DESIGN AND APPRAISALrights.
8. Did the project consider potential environmental opportunities and adverse impacts, applying a precautionary approach? (select from options 1-3 that best reflects this project): 3: Credible evidence that opportunities to enhance environmental sustainability and integrate poverty-
environment linkages were fully considered as relevant, and integrated in project strategy and design. Credible evidence that potential adverse environmental impacts have been identified and rigorously assessed with appropriate management and mitigation measures incorporated into project design and budget. (all must be true to select this option).
2: No evidence that opportunities to strengthen environmental sustainability and poverty-environment linkages were considered. Credible evidence that potential adverse environmental impacts have been identified and assessed, if relevant, and appropriate management and mitigation measures incorporated into project design and budget.
1: No evidence that opportunities to strengthen environmental sustainability and poverty-environment linkages were considered. Limited or no evidence that potential adverse environmental impacts were adequately considered.
*Note: Management action or strong management justification must be given for a score of 1
3 21
Evidence
This criteria should not apply. The project is an EA under UNFCCC, no activities should have negative impact on environment or society.
9. Has the Social and Environmental Screening Procedure (SESP) been conducted to identify potential social and environmental impacts and risks? The SESP is not required for projects in which UNDP is Administrative Agent only and/or projects comprised solely of reports, coordination of events, trainings, workshops, meetings, conferences and/or communication materials and information dissemination. [if yes, upload the completed checklist. If SESP is not required, provide the reason for the exemption in the evidence section.]
Yes No
SESP Exempt for
EA.
MANAGEMENT & MONITORING
10. Does the project have a strong results framework? (select from options 1-3 that best reflects this project): 3: The project’s selection of outputs and activities are at an appropriate level and relate in a clear way to the
project’s theory of change. Outputs are accompanied by SMART, results-oriented indicators that measure all of the key expected changes identified in the theory of change, each with credible data sources, and populated baselines and targets, including gender sensitive, sex-disaggregated indicators where appropriate. (all must be true to select this option)
2: The project’s selection of outputs and activities are at an appropriate level, but may not cover all aspects of the project’s theory of change. Outputs are accompanied by SMART, results-oriented indicators, but baselines, targets and data sources may not yet be fully specified. Some use of gender sensitive, sex-disaggregated indicators, as appropriate. (all must be true to select this option)
1: The results framework does not meet all of the conditions specified in selection “2” above. This includes: the project’s selection of outputs and activities are not at an appropriate level and do not relate in a clear way to the project’s theory of change; outputs are not accompanied by SMART, results-oriented indicators that measure the expected change, and have not been populated with baselines and targets; data sources are not specified, and/or no gender sensitive, sex-disaggregation of indicators.
*Note: Management Action or strong management justification must be given for a score of 1
3 21
Evidence
IRRF is complete
11. Is there a comprehensive and costed M&E plan in place with specified data collection sources and methods to support evidence-based management, monitoring and evaluation of the project?
Yes (3)
No (1)
12. Is the project’s governance mechanism clearly defined in the project document, including planned composition of the project board? (select from options 1-3 that best reflects this project):
3: The project’s governance mechanism is fully defined in the project composition. Individuals have been specified for each position in the governance mechanism (especially all members of the project board.) Project Board members have agreed on their roles and responsibilities as specified in the terms of reference. The ToR of the project board has been attached to the project document. (all must be true to select this option).
3 21
Evidence
Governance structure is
clear but individuals
Page | 82
PROJECT QA ASSESSMENT: DESIGN AND APPRAISAL 2: The project’s governance mechanism is defined in the project document; specific institutions are noted as
holding key governance roles, but individuals may not have been specified yet. The prodoc lists the most important responsibilities of the project board, project director/manager and quality assurance roles. (all must be true to select this option)
1: The project’s governance mechanism is loosely defined in the project document, only mentioning key roles that will need to be filled at a later date. No information on the responsibilities of key positions in the governance mechanism is provided.
*Note: Management Action or strong management justification must be given for a score of 1
(National Project
Director, SC Members)
will be designated
by the Governmen
t after Prodoc
signature.
13. Have the project risks been identified with clear plans stated to manage and mitigate each risks? (select from options 1-3 that best reflects this project):
3: Project risks related to the achievement of results are fully described in the project risk log, based on comprehensive analysis drawing on the theory of change, Social and Environmental Standards and screening, situation analysis, capacity assessments and other analysis. Clear and complete plan in place to manage and mitigate each risk. (both must be true to select this option)
2: Project risks related to the achievement of results identified in the initial project risk log with mitigation measures identified for each risk.
1: Some risks may be identified in the initial project risk log, but no evidence of analysis and no clear risk mitigation measures identified. This option is also selected if risks are not clearly identified and no initial risk log is included with the project document.
*Note: Management Action must be taken for a score of 1
3 21
Evidence
Risk log is as complete as possible.
SESP exempt, and CO
does not carry out capacity
assessments under Full Support to
NIM.
EFFICIENT
14. Have specific measures for ensuring cost-efficient use of resources been explicitly mentioned as part of the project design? This can include: i) using the theory of change analysis to explore different options of achieving the maximum results with the resources available; ii) using a portfolio management approach to improve cost effectiveness through synergies with other interventions; iii) through joint operations (e.g., monitoring or procurement) with other partners.
Yes (3)
No (1)
15. Are explicit plans in place to ensure the project links up with other relevant on-going projects and initiatives, whether led by UNDP, national or other partners, to achieve more efficient results (including, for example, through sharing resources or coordinating delivery?)
Yes (3)
No (1)
16. Is the budget justified and supported with valid estimates?
3: The project’s budget is at the activity level with funding sources, and is specified for the duration of the project period in a multi-year budget. Costs are supported with valid estimates using benchmarks from similar projects or activities. Cost implications from inflation and foreign exchange exposure have been estimated and incorporated in the budget.
2: The project’s budget is at the activity level with funding sources, when possible, and is specified for the duration of the project in a multi-year budget. Costs are supported with valid estimates based on prevailing rates.
1: The project’s budget is not specified at the activity level, and/or may not be captured in a multi-year budget.
3 21
Evidence
Budget is complete
and inflation
and exchange rates are provided for under
“Miscelleanous” budget
code
Page | 83
PROJECT QA ASSESSMENT: DESIGN AND APPRAISAL17. Is the Country Office fully recovering the costs involved with project implementation?
3: The budget fully covers all project costs that are attributable to the project, including programme management and development effectiveness services related to strategic country programme planning, quality assurance, pipeline development, policy advocacy services, finance, procurement, human resources, administration, issuance of contracts, security, travel, assets, general services, information and communications based on full costing in accordance with prevailing UNDP policies (i.e., UPL, LPL.)
2: The budget covers significant project costs that are attributable to the project based on prevailing UNDP policies (i.e., UPL, LPL) as relevant.
1: The budget does not adequately cover project costs that are attributable to the project, and UNDP is cross-subsidizing the project.
*Note: Management Action must be given for a score of 1. The budget must be revised to fully reflect the costs of implementation before the project commences.
3 21
Evidence
DPC calculation is detailed.
EFFECTIVE
18. Is the chosen implementation modality most appropriate? (select from options 1-3 that best reflects this project): 3: The required implementing partner assessments (capacity assessment, HACT micro assessment) have been
conducted, and there is evidence that options for implementation modalities have been thoroughly considered. There is a strong justification for choosing the selected modality, based on the development context. (both must be true to select this option)
2: The required implementing partner assessments (capacity assessment, HACT micro assessment) have been conducted and the implementation modality chosen is consistent with the results of the assessments.
1: The required assessments have not been conducted, but there may be evidence that options for implementation modalities have been considered.
*Note: Management Action or strong management justification must be given for a score of 1
3 21
EvidenceJustification
: Full Country
Support to NIM is the
default modality for
UNDP in Algeria and Governmen
t is responsible
for assessing
the capacity of national institutions
and identifying
key capacity-building activities
19. Have targeted groups, prioritizing marginalized and excluded populations that will be affected by the project, been engaged in the design of the project in a way that addresses any underlying causes of exclusion and discrimination?
3: Credible evidence that all targeted groups, prioritising marginalized and excluded populations that will be involved in or affected by the project, have been actively engaged in the design of the project. Their views, rights and any constraints have been analysed and incorporated into the root cause analysis of the theory of change which seeks to address any underlying causes of exclusion and discrimination and the selection of project interventions.
2: Some evidence that key targeted groups, prioritising marginalized and excluded populations that will be involved in the project, have been engaged in the design of the project. Some evidence that their views, rights and any constraints have been analysed and incorporated into the root cause analysis of the theory of change and the selection of project interventions.
1: No evidence of engagement with marginalized and excluded populations that will be involved in the project during project design. No evidence that the views, rights and constraints of populations have been incorporated into the project.
3 21
Evidence
Civil society organizatio
ns were involved in
consultative process to
develop Prodoc, see also section
1.12
Page | 84
PROJECT QA ASSESSMENT: DESIGN AND APPRAISAL20. Does the project conduct regular monitoring activities, have explicit plans for evaluation, and include other lesson
learning (e.g. through After Action Reviews or Lessons Learned Workshops), timed to inform course corrections if needed during project implementation?
Yes (3)
No(1)
21. The gender marker for all project outputs are scored at GEN2 or GEN3, indicating that gender has been fully mainstreamed into all project outputs at a minimum.
*Note: Management Action or strong management justification must be given for a score of “no”
Yes(3)
No(1)
EvidenceProject is
GEN1, may be
reconsidered during gender
analysis in inception
phase
22. Is there a realistic multi-year work plan and budget to ensure outputs are delivered on time and within allotted resources? (select from options 1-3 that best reflects this project): 3: The project has a realistic work plan & budget covering the duration of the project at the activity level to
ensure outputs are delivered on time and within the allotted resources. 2: The project has a work plan & budget covering the duration of the project at the output level. 1: The project does not yet have a work plan & budget covering the duration of the project.
3 21
Evidence
GEF Projects
have same amount
budgeted per year.
SUSTAINABILITY & NATIONAL OWNERSHIP
23. Have national partners led, or proactively engaged in, the design of the project? (select from options 1-3 that best reflects this project): 3: National partners have full ownership of the project and led the process of the development of the project
jointly with UNDP. 2: The project has been developed by UNDP in close consultation with national partners. 1: The project has been developed by UNDP with limited or no engagement with national partners.
3 21
Evidence
Prodoc was developed through extensive consultative process, including sectoral meetings and participation of all members of high-level Climate Change Committee
24. Are key institutions and systems identified, and is there a strategy for strengthening specific/ comprehensive capacities based on capacity assessments conducted? (select from options 0-4 that best reflects this project): 3: The project has a comprehensive strategy for strengthening specific capacities of national institutions based on
a systematic and detailed capacity assessment that has been completed. This strategy includes an approach to regularly monitor national capacities using clear indicators and rigorous methods of data collection, and adjust the strategy to strengthen national capacities accordingly.
2.5: A capacity assessment has been completed. The project document has identified activities that will be
3 2.52 1.5
1Evidence
Per Framework
of CooperatioPage | 85
PROJECT QA ASSESSMENT: DESIGN AND APPRAISALundertaken to strengthen capacity of national institutions, but these activities are not part of a comprehensive strategy to monitor and strengthen national capacities.
2: A capacity assessment is planned after the start of the project. There are plans to develop a strategy to strengthen specific capacities of national institutions based on the results of the capacity assessment.
1.5: There is mention in the project document of capacities of national institutions to be strengthened through the project, but no capacity assessments or specific strategy development are planned.
1: Capacity assessments have not been carried out and are not foreseen. There is no strategy for strengthening specific capacities of national institutions.
n, Governmen
t is responsible for capacity assessment
s
25. Is there is a clear strategy embedded in the project specifying how the project will use national systems (i.e., procurement, monitoring, evaluations, etc.,) to the extent possible?
Yes (3)
No (1)
26. Is there a clear transition arrangement/ phase-out plan developed with key stakeholders in order to sustain or scale up results (including resource mobilisation strategy)?
Yes (3)
No (1)
Page | 86
Annex E. UNDP Risk Log
OFFLINE RISK LOG
Project Title: ELABORATION OF THE THIRD NATIONAL COMMUNICATION AND FIRST BIENNIAL REPORT OF ALGERIA TO THE UNFCCC
Award ID: 00111680 Date:
# Description Date Identified Type
Impact &Probability
Countermeasures / Mngt response Owner Submitted,
updated byLast Update Status
1
Low political interest, support, and involvement in the process of elaboration of TNC and BUR1
30 January 2018 Political
This will negatively impact the involvement of all institutional stakeholders to implement the project of TNC and BUR1.
P = 1
I = 4
Inform and sensitize high level decision makers to the TNC and BUR1 project (Prime minister, Ministers and high level staff of all ministries), Invite high level policy makers to the kick off meeting of the project.
UNDP
National Consultant for PIF and PRODOC
05 June 2018
No change
2 Low project management capacities of Climate change department in the
30 January 2018
Organizational
New young staff inexperienced in NC and BUR project management can slow down the project execution
Capacity building of all staff to the project management procedures and related document, training oon the
UNDP National Consultant for PIF and PRODOC
05 June 2018
No change
Page | 87
Ministry of Environment and renewable energy (MEER) and the climate change national agency (ANCC)
P = 2I = 3
UNDP/GEF procedures of NC and BUR project management
3
Low commitment of all sectors to contribute to provide BUR1 and TNC with necessary data and information, to implement parts of the project as planned - Sectoral commitments to provide data on a regular and continuous basis not met- Procedures and protocol for inventory data transmission not implemented
30 January 2018
Operational and Organizational
Inventory cannot be compiled and reporting not received from all sectors and delay the process to meet the deadline of BUR1 submission
P = 1I = 5
Early selection, and involvement of staff from all sectors and stakeholders, training of all staff participating to the GHG emission inventory and providing data and information
UNDP
National Consultant for PIF and PRODOC
05 June 2018
No change
4 - Difficulties to data access and information from private sector to estimate emissions- Confidentiality of some data and information from energy and industry sectors
30 January 2018
Operational Organizational
Without data from private sectors, and complete data from industry and energy sectors, the emission inventory is not complete and not representative of emissions occurring in Algeria.
Training workshops for capacity building and sensitizing all participants at different levels to have them in the process
UNDP National Consultant for PIF and PRODOC
05 June 2018
No change
Page | 88
- Confidentiality of data for some projects carried out in partnership with international companies in Algeria- lack of sectoral reporting on implemented mitigation measures- Low technical and human capacities of companies to identify and implement mitigation actions
P = 1I = 5
5
- Low capacities for QA/QC plan and MRV system implementation
30 January 2018
Operational Organizational
Data quality control and assurance is key to have high quality of GHG emission estimation, the implementation of such system for all sectors will take time.
P = 1I = 2
Training workshops for all staff concerned and involved for implementing the QA/QC plan and MRV system
UNDP
National Consultant for PIF and PRODOC
05 June 2018
No change
6 - Lack of national expertise to carry out specific studies related to V&A- Low or late involvement of researchers and academia to conduct vulnerability and
30 January 2018
Operational
Without national experts participation to the process, it would be hard to conduct all activities to collect information and conduct sectoral studies
P = 1I = 3
Use of all media to communication project launch and dissemination of information for expert selection and hire national experts
UNDP National Consultant for PIF and PRODOC
05 June 2018
No change
Page | 89
adaptation studies
7
- All working groups meet the deadlines for the activities of each part of BUR1 and TNC- All stakeholders participate on time to the review of all reports submitted for validation
30 January 2018
Organizational
Project deliverables not obtained according to the schedule which delays BUR1 and TNC final compilation and submission P = 1I = 3
Follow up by the project unit of all groups and experts to implement activities in due time with deliverables
UNDP
National Consultant for PIF and PRODOC
05 June 2018
No change
8
- Loss in exchange- Devaluation of the Algerian dinar- Fluctuation of the Algerian Dinar against US Dollar- High inflation
30 January 2018 Financial
Exchange loss and any local financial market sudden fluctuation could affect the planned budget and payment of project activities. P = 1I = 2
close follow up of financial market in Algeria and Updating budget management
UNDP
National Consultant for PIF and PRODOC
05 June 2018
No change
Page | 90
Annex F. Results of the capacity assessment of the project implementing partner and HACT micro assessment
In accordance with UNDP Algeria Country Programme Document 2016-2020, the national implementation modality applies by default, with UNDP providing support services (Full Country Support to NIM). No advanced payments or other transfers to the Ministry of Environment and Renewable Energy or any other national entity will be processed. Therefore, capacity assessment of the project implementing partner and HACT micro assessment do not apply.
Page | 91
Annex G. Standard letter of agreement between UNDP and the government for the provision of support services
Dear [name of government official],
1. Reference is made to consultations between officials of the Government of [the name of programme country] (hereinafter referred to as “the Government”) and officials of UNDP with respect to the provision of support services by the UNDP country office for nationally managed programmes and projects. UNDP and the Government hereby agree that the UNDP country office may provide such support services at the request of the Government through its institution designated in the relevant programme support document or project document, as described below.
2. The UNDP country office may provide support services for assistance with reporting requirements and direct payment. In providing such support services, the UNDP country office shall ensure that the capacity of the Government-designated institution is strengthened to enable it to carry out such activities directly. The costs incurred by the UNDP country office in providing such support services shall be recovered from the administrative budget of the office.
3. The UNDP country office may provide, at the request of the designated institution, the following support services for the activities of the project:
(a) Identification and/or recruitment of project and programme personnel;
(b) Financial Management (processing of payments);(c) Procurement of goods and services;
4. The procurement of goods and services and the recruitment of project and programme personnel by the UNDP country office shall be in accordance with the UNDP regulations, rules, policies and procedures. Support services described in paragraph 3 above shall be detailed in an annex to the project document, in the form provided in the Attachment hereto. If the requirements for support services by the country office change during the life of a project, the annex to the programme support document or project document is revised with the mutual agreement of the UNDP resident representative and the designated institution.
5. The relevant provisions of the Agreement concerning assistance from UNDP to the Government of the People’s Republic of Algeria (Standard Basic Assistance Agreement) signed at Algiers on 20 July 2977 (the “SBAA”), including the provisions on liability and privileges and immunities, shall apply to the provision of such support services. The Government shall retain overall responsibility for the nationally managed programme or project through its designated institution. The responsibility of the UNDP country office for the provision of the support services described herein shall be limited to the provision of such support services detailed in the annex to the programme support document or project document.
6. Any claim or dispute arising under or in connection with the provision of support services by the UNDP country office in accordance with this letter shall be handled pursuant to the relevant provisions of the SBAA.
Page | 92
7. The manner and method of cost-recovery by the UNDP country office in providing the support services described in paragraph 3 above shall be specified in the annex to the programme support document or project document.
8. The UNDP country office shall submit progress reports on the support services provided and shall report on the costs reimbursed in providing such services, as may be required.
9. Any modification of the present arrangements shall be effected by mutual written agreement of the parties hereto.
10. If you are in agreement with the provisions set forth above, please sign and return to this office two signed copies of this letter. Upon your signature, this letter shall constitute an agreement between your Government and UNDP on the terms and conditions for the provision of support services by the UNDP country office for nationally managed programmes and projects.
Yours sincerely,
________________________Signed on behalf of UNDP
[Name][Title: Resident Representative]
_____________________For the Government[Name/title][Date]
Page | 93
Attachment
DESCRIPTION OF UNDP COUNTRY OFFICE SUPPORT SERVICES
1. Reference is made to consultations between the institution designated by the Government of Algeria (the Ministry of Environment and Renewable Energy) and officials of UNDP with respect to the provision of support services by the UNDP country office for the nationally managed project entitled “Elaboration Of The Third National Communication And First Biennial Report Of Algeria To The UNFCCC” (“the Project”).
2. In accordance with the provisions of the letter of agreement signed on [insert date of agreement] and the project document, the UNDP country office shall provide support services for the Project as described below.
3. Support services to be provided:
Support servicesSchedule for the provision of the support services
Cost to UNDP of providing such support services (where appropriate)
Amount and method of reimbursement of UNDP (where appropriate)
1. HUMAN RESOURCES
Identification and recruitment of project personnel (Advertising, Short-listing, Interviewing)
January 2019 and through project execution (in case of early separation)
Per Universal Price List:
3 x $375.02 = $1125
UNDP will directly charge the project upon receipt of request of services
Staff HR and Benefits Administration and Management
At Contract Issuance and Separation of Service
Per Universal Price List:
6 x $139.62 = $838As above
Recurrent personnel management services: Staff Payroll and Banking Administration and Management
On-going during project execution (annual fee per staff, per calendar year)
Per Universal Price List:
8 x $310.33 = $2483As above
2. FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
AR Management On-going during project execution
Per Universal Price List:
48 x $22.52 = $10815As above
Creating and managing vendors
On-going during project execution
Per Universal Price List:
42 x $13.58 = $570As above
Issuing checks On-going during project execution
Per Universal Price List:
33 x $12.79 = $422As above
Page | 94
Processing payments (including for consultants)
On-going during project execution
Per Universal Price List:
150 x $27.58 = $4137As above
3. PROCUREMENT OF GOODS AND SERVICESIdentification and recruitment of consultants (advertising, short-listing and selection, contract issuance)
On-going during project execution
Per Universal Price List:
20 x $148.41 = $2968As above
Procurement process involving local Contracts, Assets and Procurement Committee or other procedure (ITB, RFP)
On-going during project execution
Per Universal Price List:
3 x $341.61 = $1025As above
Procurement process not involving local CAP (low value procurement)
On-going during project execution
Per Universal Price List:
40 x $140.73 = $5629As above
Disposal of equipment On-going during project execution
Per Universal Price List:
6 x $173.48 = $1041As above
4. TRAVEL SERVICES
Processing travel authorizations
On-going during project execution
Per Universal Price List:
12 x $23.90 = $287As above
F10 Settlement On-going during project execution
Per Universal Price List:
12 x $22.03 = $264As above
Total: up to max. USD 21 870 from GEF grant
Page | 95
Annex H. Final report of Algeria’s national communication / biennial update report project
Monitoring and Evaluation plans of climate change enabling activities for the preparation of National Communications on Climate Change and/or Biennial Update Reports do not require the production and publication of Terminal Evaluation Reports. Therefore, a number of intended purposes of such terminal exercises are not captured in full, including:
The promotion of accountability and transparency, and the assessment and disclosure of the extent of the project accomplishments;
A synthesis of lessons that can help to improve the selection, design and implementation of future GEF financed UNDP activities;
The provision of feedback on issues that are recurrent across the portfolio, attention needed, and on improvements regarding previously identified issues; and
The contribution to the GEF Evaluation Office databases for aggregation, analysis and reporting on effectiveness of GEF operations in achieving global environmental benefits and on the quality of monitoring and evaluation across the GEF system.
The intent of this Final Report is not to propose an abridged alternative to the Terminal Evaluation Report. Instead, its purpose is to gather some insightful details about the process of preparing the mandatory report under the UNFCCC that can be of use to both the UNDP support teams, and the current and future national project teams. Its focus is therefore on providing:
A synthesis of lessons that can help to improve the selection, design and implementation of future GEF financed UNDP activities; and
Feedback on issues that are recurrent across the portfolio, attention needed, and on improvements regarding previously identified issues.
National project teams in charge of the future enabling activity for the preparation of the National Communication or Biennial Update Report can therefore rely on a valuable source of information from inception to closure of the project, and UNDP support teams can further disseminate lessons across borders, fully up-taking its guiding role as implementing agency and partner within the Global Support Programme (GSP, previously known as National Communications Support Programme). The template has been designed with the purpose of collecting relevant information, without representing a time-intensive and human resource-intensive burden to the current national project team. It is therefore divided into three core sections – project identification phase, project implementation phase and project follow-up –with for each section a limited number of open questions. The intention is to have the team leader, project manager or equivalent figure completing the template, in close collaboration with other team members within the last two months of project implementation. It is furthermore the intention of the completion of this Final Report to trigger the discussions of the upcoming National Communication and/or Biennial Update Report, taking advantage of the momentum created by the ongoing project, the presence of the core of the current national project team, and the renewed interest of national counterparts with the perspectives of an eminent or recent submission to the UNFCCC. The completion of this template has been made mandatory and has been budgeted for in all projects that received approval post 2013 (3 working days equivalent of project manager’s time). You are kindly invited to send the completed template to Damiano Borgogno, [email protected] and to Eva Huttova, [email protected].
A. Details of the projectProject’s titlePIMS numberOverall budget
including GEF grant including co-financing
Duration of implementationPlanned duration of projectImplementing partnerTeam Leader’s name and contact detailsLink to final report
B. Project identification phaseDuration of preparatory phase (expressed in months) ________________________________________Was the project document developed by a national/international consultant? (Please, provide name if yes and expand on the satisfaction of this collaboration.)____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Please, shortly describe the milestones of this initial preparatory phase (e.g. consultation workshops held, telephone interviews with key stakeholders, among others)____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Where consultations made with one or more of the following stakeholder groups?Ministry of Finance (or equivalent) Women’s associationsOther Ministries (not being the Ministry in charge of climate change)
Youth movements
Local Governments Indigenous peoples’ representativesNational universities Environment or climate related NGOsDomestic Research Centers Other NGOs/CSOsMedia Others (specify)
What were the main objectives for the project identified as a result of this preparatory phase?____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page | 97
What were the major challenges faced during this phase?________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Looking back, what issues that were identified and/or overlooked during this preparatory phase had an impact on the successive implementation phase?________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
C. Project implementation phase
Technical components1. GHG inventory
Base year of the GHG inventory:Base years used in previous GHG inventories:
Expected outcome Expected output 1Expected output 2Expected output 3
Final outcome Final output 1Final output 2Final output 3
…Please, shortly discuss the expected outcomes and outputs of the GHG inventory component, and compare to what was actually realized within the context of this project. If there was any diverting from the originally expected outcomes and outputs, please explain the causes (e.g. lack of data, risk of duplication of work done in the context of parallel projects, among others).____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Can you describe the process(es) implemented to generate and validate outcomes and outputs?
Page | 98
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________What pieces of advice do you have for future project teams?________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
2. Mitigation actions
Expected outcome(s) Expected output 1Expected output 2Expected output 3
…
Final outcome(s)Final output 1Final output 2Final output 3
…Please, shortly discuss the expected outcomes and outputs of the vulnerability and adaptation measures and mitigation measures components, and compare to what was actually realized within the context of this project. If there was any diverting from the originally expected outcomes and outputs, please explain the causes (e.g. lack of data, risk of duplication of work done in the context of parallel projects, among others).____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Can you describe the process(es) implemented to generate and validate outcomes and outputs? ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
What pieces of advice do you have for future project teams?________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
3. Vulnerability & Adaptation for NC or MRV for BUR
Page | 99
Expected outcome(s) Expected output 1Expected output 2Expected output 3
…
Final outcome(s)Final output 1Final output 2Final output 3
…Please, shortly discuss the expected outcomes and outputs of the vulnerability and adaptation measures and mitigation measures components, and compare to what was actually realized within the context of this project. If there was any diverting from the originally expected outcomes and outputs, please explain the main reasons (e.g. lack of data, risk of duplication of work done in the context of parallel projects, among others).____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Can you describe the process(es) implemented to generate and validate outcomes and outputs? ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________What pieces of advice do you have for future project teams?________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
4. Constraints and Gaps/Support needed
Expected outcome Expected output 1Expected output 2Expected output 3
…
Final outcome Final output 1Final output 2Final output 3
Page | 100
…
Please, shortly discuss the expected outcomes and outputs of the Constraints and gaps, and related financial, technical and capacity needs component, and compare to what was actually realized within the context of this project. If there was any diverting from the originally expected outcomes and outputs, please explain the main reasons (e.g. lack of data, risk of duplication of work done in the context of parallel projects, among others).____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Can you describe the process(es) implemented to generate and validate outcomes and outputs? ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________What pieces of advice do you have for future project teams?________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Capacities and use of capacitiesDo you believe the project has built - in a durable and cost-effective way - human and institutional capacities? Please, elaborate.____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Please, estimate the amount of work done by national consultants versus international consultants:______________% national consultants. ________________% international consultants and ____________% national staff. What work was entrusted to international consultants and for what reasons?____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________What would you have done differently, or do you advise the next project team to consider in this context?____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Additional remarks____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Institutional arrangements
Page | 101
Please, summarize an overview of the institutional arrangements for the project implementation.____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Please, describe the composition of the project team. ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Will the team remain in place, even after the project has fully closed?____________________________________________________________________________________Were gender considerations taken into account during the project design and implementation? If so, how?____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Which were the strengths and weaknesses of the institutional arrangements used?---------------------------------------------What suggestions have you to make regarding the institutional arrangements for future NC/BUR work?____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Additional remarks____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Technical support from GSP, CGE, or other bodiesHas the project team, or members of the project team, participated in national, regional or global training events organized by a center of excellence or above mentioned body during the course of the project? If yes, please, specify the training event(s).____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________What has been the contribution of this participation to the project results?____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________What identified knowledge gaps holding back the proper implementation of the NC project could not be addressed by any of the above mentioned bodies?____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________In addition to capacity building support, what other assistance did the project team receive during project implementation? (E.g. review of draft report, technical backstopping of international expert)____________________________________________________________________________________
Page | 102
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Has UNDP provided timely and valuable support during project design and implementation? Please explain.____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
D. Next stepsHow will findings of the project be further disseminated, if at all?____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Are balance funds available under the NC/BUR project going to be used to identify the strategy of the next report?________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________At full project closure, is there a person or institute to whom one can turn in case there are follow-up questions to the NC/BUR? ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Has the Government expressed interest to further work with UNDP on the next coming report? If no, please explain.________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
E. Additional informationDateName and e-mail address of person who completed this templateOthers involved in completion of this template (names of individuals and their institutions)In case a terminal evaluation report has been produced, please link it here.Other attachments
Page | 103
Annex I. GEF Operational Focal Point’s Endorsement Letter
Page | 104