program management
DESCRIPTION
Program Management. KSPE 4250 Ch 2. Vision Statement. A concise statement that describes the ideal state to which the organization aspires. Include hopes and aspirations name the service provider name the service to be provided ID the target clients ID level of quality. Mission Statement. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Program Management
KSPE 4250 Ch 2
Vision Statement
A concise statement that describes the ideal state to which the organization aspires. Include hopes and aspirations
name the service providername the service to be provided
ID the target clientsID level of quality
Mission Statement
A written expression of an organization’s philosophy, purposes, and characteristics should help the ATC
direct resources toward a specific task
inspire ATC’s to do a good job
should be action oriented
Mission Statement
particular services to be offered, primary market, technology used to deliver services
“self concept” of the program based on evaluation of strengths and weaknesses
desired program image based on feedback from internal and external stakeholders
Mission Statement
goals of the programphilosophy of the program and code of behavior
Planning A type of decision making
process in which a course of action is determined in order to bring about a future state of affairs
According to Ackoff (1970) planning is a special type of decision making with 3 characteristics it takes place before any action
occurs
Planning
it is needed to produce a future state that will unlikely occur without action
the future desired state results from multiple independent decisions
Planning
Strategic Planning: a type of planning that involves critical self examination in order to bring about organizational improvement
Operational Planning: a type of plan that defines organizational activities in the short term
Strategic Planning
Critically examine the program Why does the program exist? What should the business of
the program be? Determine if mission of program
is consistent with the overall mission of the institution
Strategic Planning
Helps build support for the program
Tool for improvement
Strategic Planning
Major Outside Interests = those outside your organization or institution, EX: society, NATA
Strategic Planning: Accreditation
Formal recognition provided to an organization or one of its programs indicating that it meets certain prescribed quality standards
Accreditation standards should be considered when developing a program.
Accreditation standards are minimalist in nature.
Strategic Planning: Accreditation
JCAHO CARF
Strategic Planning
Major Inside Interests =EX: administrators, coaches
Strategic Planning/research (Database)
Look at past program performance
Look at present program performance
Forecast: predict future conditions on the basis of statistics and indicators from the past and present
Strategic Planning/WOTS UP
Weakness, Opportunities, Threats, Strengths underlying planning
Appropriate for programs that are established
Have diverse participants
Operational Planning
This is a type of plan that defines organizational activities in the short term 3 types of Operational Planing
PoliciesProceduresProcesses
Operational Planning
Policy: a type of plan that expresses an organization’s intended behavior relative to a specific program sub function broad statements
Operational Planning
Processes: a collection of incremental and dependent steps designed to direct the most important tasks of the organization.
Operational Planning
Procedures: a operational plan that provides specific directions for members of an organization to follow clearly written, simple
language
Operational Planning
Practices: the action that actually takes place in response to administrative problems.
Gives ATC’s have some freedom in performing tasks.
Meetings
Characteristics of Successful meetings
1. Group reached decisions in meeting
2. Group rarely needed to undo decisions
3. Decisions were important and meaningful
4. Meetings were enjoyable
Organizing the Meeting
1. An agenda
2. Participants
3. Materials needed to address agenda items
4. Practice – touch base before the meeting
Meetings: 3 Parts
1. Announcements
2. Decisions
3. Discussion
Allows for all to give input and stay on track
Meetings: Control Behavior
Be prepared Pay attention Take notes Be respectful of others
Meetings: Avoid New BusinessNo one is prepared to address the
new business. Oftentimes this new business is an important matter and personnel is caught off guard and do not feel as if they were able to give good or useful input.
Meetings: Avoid Reports
Deliver this information in writing or via email. Can be referred to both prior to
and after the meeting
Meetings: Look to the Future & Make Decisions
Take time to consider future issues
The chairperson is critical to making decisions. Gather and communicate info, process
likely outcomes, pro and con list, consider all perspectives, decide to decide
Communicate & Develop the Plan Agreement-trust Matrix
Allies: people who support the plan Opponents: support a program but not
a plan related to that program Bedfellows: exhibit support but may
change sides Adversaries: unsupportive of the
program and the plan
Program Evaluation
should be done regularly info from: patient files,
injury and tx summaries, client testimonials, graduation and NATABOC rates, employment, alumni and athlete surveys
Program Evaluation
Summative: describes effectiveness or accomplishments of a program
Formative: designed to improve a program
Program Evaluation
External Evaluators JRC-AT: uses ATC’s trained in
program evaluation to judge the quality of athletic training education programs for schools requesting accreditation
Program Evaluation
Goals: general statements of the program intent
Objectives: specific statements of how a program intends to accomplish a particular goal.
Criteria: quantifiable measures used to determine whether a particular objective has been accomplished
Frequency of Program Eval
This should be an ongoing process.
Mini evaluations should be performed each year.
A complete eval. should be done every 3-5 years.
Program Evaluation/outcomes Assessment This evaluation is designed to provide
objective, measurable evidence that the care provided by the ATC was effective in improving the patient’s functional ability.
See NATA outcome assessments