prognostic factors for patients with spinal metastases from lung cancer
DESCRIPTION
Prognostic Factors for Patients With Spinal Metastases From Lung CancerTRANSCRIPT
Multispecialty
Search News & Perspective
No instant look-up matches. Search within full reference content by clicking the "SEARCH" button or pressing enter.
News & PerspectiveDrugs & DiseasesCME & Education
Log InRegister
CommentComment CommentComment PrintPrint
Spine
Prognostic Factors for Patients With SpinalMetastases From Lung Cancer
Satoshi Ogihara, MD, Atsushi Seichi, MD, Takahiro Hozumi, MD, Hiroyuki Oka, MD, Ryuuji Ieki,MD, Kozo Nakamura, MD, Taiji Kondoh, MD Disclosures
Abstract and Introduction
Abstract
Study Design: We conducted a retrospective study to identify prognosticfactors of patients with spinal metastases from lung cancer.
Objective: To provide clinical data with strong association to the prognosisand to propose criteria determining indication of operation for spinal
metastases.
Summary of Background Data: To make a proper selection of patients forwhom surgery is indicated, forecasting short-time survival after spinalmetastases is very important. In the past, there has been no report ofprognostic factors of patients with such metastases from this cancer.
Methods: This study included 114 patients with spinal metastases of lungcancer. Tumors were histologically categorized as non-small cell lung
cancer (NSCLC) in 94 patients and small cell lung cancer (SCLC) in 20patients. We investigated prognostic factors after spinal metastases using
Cox comparative hazard model and a preoperative prognostic scoreproposed by Tokuhashi. We also investigated the patients who underwent operation for spinal metastases from lung cancer in
our hospital.
Results: Multivariate analysis showed that the significant prognostic factors for survival after spinal metastases from NSCLCwere performance status (PS), Ca, Alb. Among SCLC patients, Ca, Alb, and a history of chemotherapy were significant (P <0.05) in univariate analysis. The score of Tokuhashi was not correlative to the survival period. Among the operated patients,
postoperative PS was significant for the period of postoperative survival.
Conclusion: PS, Ca, and Alb in NSCLC and Ca, Alb, and a history of chemotherapy in SCLC are useful for determining anindication of operation for spinal metastases from lung cancer.
Introduction
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death in men and women in the world.[1] Lung cancer has been reported tofrequently metastasize to the bone, especially to the spine, the reported incidence being 44% and 26%.[2,3] Clinicians
sometimes encounter patients with spinal metastases from lung cancer. Paralysis due to spinal cord compression decreasesthe activities of daily living (ADL) of patients and forces a surgeon to make a determination about the necessity of surgical
treatment. To decide on the optimal treatment, medical personnel including surgeons must have information on theirprognosis. The prognosis of lung cancer patients with spinal metastases has been considered worse than that of other cancers
with spinal metastases;[4,5] therefore, conservative palliative therapies have been chosen in many cases.
To make a proper selection of patients indicated for surgery, forecasting the individual's short-time survival after theoccurrence of spinal metastases is very important. An expected survival time over 3 to 6 months has been used as a criterionfor choosing surgical treatment,[4] but there have been few reports of prognostic factors of patients with spinal metastases.
We conducted a retrospective study to identify prognostic factors of patients with spinal metastases of lung cancer, and weattempted to provide clinical data with a strong association to the prognosis and to propose criteria for determining indication
of surgery in these cases.
MOST POPULAR ARTICLESAccording to PHYSICIANS
1. Growing Doubt on Statin Drugs: TheProblem of Drug-Lifestyle Interaction
2. 'I've Had It With Medicine!' 16 Options forSecond Careers
3. Emergency Department Crowding andLoss of Medical Licensure
4. Naproxen CV Safety vs IbuprofenChallenged in WHI Analysis
5. Do Healthcare CEOs Deserve More MoneyThan Doctors?
View More
Spine. 2006;31(14):1585-1590.
Abstract and IntroductionPatients and Methods
ResultsDiscussion
ReferencesSidebar: Key Points
EDITORS' RECOMMENDATIONS
Largest Cancer Gene Database MadePublic
Cancer and Chemo Linked to ReducedRisk for AD
Infection Related to Implantable CentralVenous Access Devices in Cancer
Patients
About MedscapePrivacy PolicyTerms of Use
WebMDMedscape France
Medscape DeutschlandMedicineNet
eMedicineHealthRxList
WebMD CorporateHelp
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2014 by WebMD LLC. This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
more
Also on Medscape - Don't miss…
CPAP Treatment Motivator: BetterSexual Function
Also on Medscape - Don't miss…
1 of 4Next PageNext Page
CommentCommentCommentComment
Spine. 2006;31(14):1585-1590. © 2006 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
No funds were received in support of this work. No benefits in any form have been or will be received from a commercial party relateddirectly or indirectly to the subject of this manuscript.
The manuscript submitted does not contain information about medical device(s)/drug(s).
CPAP Treatment Motivator: BetterSexual Function