profiling near-earth debris using picosatellites · orbital debris is estimated at 2x108 particles...

8
Profiling near-Earth debris using Profiling near-Earth debris using picosatellites picosatellites Can you do science with a shoebox-sized satellite? TRapping with Aerogel Prototype Satellite (TRAPSat) Design, build and launch a CubeSat capable of capturing and taking pictures of orbital debris, particles and dust in low earth orbit using Aerogel. Multidisciplinary, student lead, educational satellite development 'exploded' CAD cutaway of TRAPSat Ryan Schrenk, Mikus Bormanis, Travis White, Angela Walters, Alex Antunes Capitol College (Laurel, MD)

Upload: others

Post on 24-Sep-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Profiling near-Earth debris using picosatellites · Orbital debris is estimated at 2x108 particles (>1cm), and 7x105 (>1mm). Density (>1mm) is roughly 10-4 particles per km3 (Weidemann

Profiling near-Earth debris using Profiling near-Earth debris using picosatellitespicosatellites

❏ Can you do science with a shoebox-sized satellite?

❏ TRapping with Aerogel Prototype Satellite (TRAPSat)

❏ Design, build and launch a CubeSat capable of capturing and taking pictures of orbital debris, particles and dust in low earth orbit using Aerogel.

❏ Multidisciplinary, student lead,educational satellite development

'exploded' CAD cutaway of TRAPSat

Ryan Schrenk, Mikus Bormanis, Travis White, Angela Walters, Alex AntunesCapitol College (Laurel, MD)

Page 2: Profiling near-Earth debris using picosatellites · Orbital debris is estimated at 2x108 particles (>1cm), and 7x105 (>1mm). Density (>1mm) is roughly 10-4 particles per km3 (Weidemann

Pro:

1) Inexpensive to build & launch

2) Low Risk

3) Allows Rapid Development

Con:

1)Small detectors only

2)Low weight

3)Low data rates

Best for:

prototyping detector techin-situ measurements

constellation & swarm measurements

Pico Feasibility for Science?

Page 3: Profiling near-Earth debris using picosatellites · Orbital debris is estimated at 2x108 particles (>1cm), and 7x105 (>1mm). Density (>1mm) is roughly 10-4 particles per km3 (Weidemann

Aerogel for Debris and Dust Mapping

❏ Used successfully on multiple NASA missionsCaptured micrometeorites, comet dust/debris, and particulate matter

❏ Light weight❏ Transparent❏ Absorbs high velocity impacts❏ Works in vacuum❏ No power needed

NASA Stardust Aerogel sample image

Imaging through Aerogel in the Capitol lab

Page 4: Profiling near-Earth debris using picosatellites · Orbital debris is estimated at 2x108 particles (>1cm), and 7x105 (>1mm). Density (>1mm) is roughly 10-4 particles per km3 (Weidemann

Tested-BalloonLaunch,April 2014

❏ >78,000 feet altitude❏Estimated -45 C❏ 180 pictures in 3 hours❏ 180MB data❏Captured 1 'grain' during descent!

“Raw” Aerogel slab imaging on ground

Page 5: Profiling near-Earth debris using picosatellites · Orbital debris is estimated at 2x108 particles (>1cm), and 7x105 (>1mm). Density (>1mm) is roughly 10-4 particles per km3 (Weidemann

Orbital debris is estimated at 2x108 particles (>1cm), and 7x105 (>1mm).Density (>1mm) is roughly 10-4 particles per km3 (Weidemann and Vorsemann, 2012).

At 10 km/sec, a 10 x 10 cm LEO detector maps debris every 103 sec

With our 1mm dust mapper,we expect 0-2 detectable debris per orbit.

“Typical” circumsolar gas-to-dust ratios are 100:1, with typical gas densities of 5 atoms/cm3.At 10km/sec, a 10 x 10 cm detector will sweep out 5 x 104 dust/sec.But, most are <0.1um; large dust grains > 1um are our target of interest.Fractional abundances 1x10-6 for C and 10-8 - 10-9 for Al

2O

3, Si

3N

4 (Draine, 2003)

With a 1um dust mapper, we expect 0-1 detectable 1um dust per minute.

Utility: Orbital Debris vsCircumstellar Dust?

artist conception, TRAPSat in orbit

Page 6: Profiling near-Earth debris using picosatellites · Orbital debris is estimated at 2x108 particles (>1cm), and 7x105 (>1mm). Density (>1mm) is roughly 10-4 particles per km3 (Weidemann

The fun thing about debris and dust is it is not evenly distributed.

Ubiquitous Swarm of Dust Mappers

Orbital debris tends to concentrate at the poles.collisional debris clusters in streams.Charged dust is pushed by solar wind.dust >1um is affected by gravity.Mariner 4 (1967) ran into an unmapped cloud of dust.LADEE specifically sampled dust near the lunar surface.

Autonomous bolt-on dust mappers returning frequency information-- size and velocity of large grains-- produces an aggregate data set.

ESA forecast on LEO orbital debris

Page 7: Profiling near-Earth debris using picosatellites · Orbital debris is estimated at 2x108 particles (>1cm), and 7x105 (>1mm). Density (>1mm) is roughly 10-4 particles per km3 (Weidemann

Next- Pico science for near-Earth and Translunar Dust Mapping?

The “LunarCubes” movement seeks to use picosatellites past LEOCubes make good 'piggyback' packages on existing spacecraft; require no interfacing.Ergo, we suggest flying Dust Mappers as carry-on secondaries.

Precedent: United Launch Alliance discussed “Rideshare CubeSat Missions for Lunar Explorations” at the LunarCubes workshop, Nov 2013.

TRAPSat, 72,000 feet up, April 2014

Page 8: Profiling near-Earth debris using picosatellites · Orbital debris is estimated at 2x108 particles (>1cm), and 7x105 (>1mm). Density (>1mm) is roughly 10-4 particles per km3 (Weidemann

Profiling near-Earth debris using Profiling near-Earth debris using picosatellitespicosatellites

Ryan Schrenk, Mikus Bormanis, Travis White, Angela Walters, Alex AntunesCapitol College (Laurel, MD)

The 'TrapSat' team at Capitol College adopts Aerogel to do in-orbit and potentially trans-lunar capture and observation of incident debris. We present early test results for this detector to measure the mass and distribution of ambient near-Earth and interplanetary debris. Expected debris includes both man-made orbital debris as well as micrometeorite particles. The theory is that depth images showing penetration of debris into the Aerogel capture mechanism (used successfully in comet capture missions) are transmitted to track the accumulation rate and estimated size of particles.

Astronautical EngineeringRyan Schrenk, Lead Engineer

Mikus Bormanis, Structural EngineerTravis White, Software Engineer

Trinity Wallace, Project AnalystEric Chubin, Payload Engineer

Nathan Weideman, EngineerWalter Diaz, Electrical EngineerCJ Giovingo, Integration Engineer

Phillip Frazier, Communications Engineer

artist conception, TRAPSat in orbit