professor graham currie the uber verdict

43
The Uber Verdict technology, transport and cities Professor Graham Currie Public Transport Research Group Institute of Transport Studies Monash University, Australia Shared and App Based Transport Innovation Seminar Melbourne Town Hall 15 th June 2015

Upload: dr-elliot-fishman

Post on 13-Aug-2015

186 views

Category:

Technology


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Professor Graham Currie The Uber Verdict

The Uber Verdict technology, transport and cities

Professor Graham Currie Public Transport Research Group Institute of Transport Studies Monash University, Australia Shared and App Based Transport Innovation Seminar Melbourne Town Hall 15th June 2015

Page 2: Professor Graham Currie The Uber Verdict

1.  Introduction 2.  UberX 3.  Taxis in a Dry Climate 4.  Why Regulate? 5.  Assessment 6.  Futures

Agenda

2 2

Page 3: Professor Graham Currie The Uber Verdict

3

This paper explores the good/ bad of UberX with a view to guiding future urban transport policy §  UberX - highly popular, innovative expanding new urban mobility option §  Taxi Industry/ State Government - UberX is ‘illegal’/ against regulations

§  This presentation seeks to understand all sides of the UberX debate to seek a balanced approach to future transport

§  Acknowledgements: major inputs from –  Those that responded to my post on Uber issues at the ITS

(Monash) LinkedIn social media site –  Final Year Transport Engineering students at Monash who ran the

following research projects: •  Andrew Chan – The Impact of Uber in Australia •  Liam Harris – Can uberX surge pricing help solve ride shortages?

Page 4: Professor Graham Currie The Uber Verdict

4

It is structured as follows

Why Regulate? Assessment UberX Futures Taxis in a Dry

Climate

Page 5: Professor Graham Currie The Uber Verdict

Agenda 1.  Introduction 2.  UberX 3.  Taxis in a Dry Climate 4.  Why Regulate? 5.  Assessment 6.  Futures

5 5

Page 6: Professor Graham Currie The Uber Verdict

6

UberX is a smartphone app that lets consumers submit trip requests to crowd sourced taxi drivers

UberX

•  Founded SF 2009 - Started in Australia (Sydney Oct 2012)

•  Very user friendly mobile location App •  Generally cheaper than conventional

taxis •  Users can provide feedback on

individual drivers used

Page 7: Professor Graham Currie The Uber Verdict

7

It has many innovative features including user driver ratings and…

UberX

•  Founded SF 2009 - Started in Australia (Sydney Oct 2012)

•  Very user friendly mobile location App •  Generally cheaper than conventional

taxis •  Users can provide feedback on

individual drivers used

Page 8: Professor Graham Currie The Uber Verdict

8

…surge pricing - to improve supply in the peaks

UberX

•  Founded SF 2009 - Started in Australia (Sydney Oct 2012)

•  Very user friendly mobile location App •  Generally cheaper than conventional

taxis •  Users can provide feedback on

individual drivers used

Source: Harris L and Currie G (2015) Surge and Rescue: Can UberX surge pricing help solve ride shortages

UberX Surge Pricing - Melbourne

Page 9: Professor Graham Currie The Uber Verdict

Because uberX is digital/spatial some spectacular analytics are possible Taxi e-hails in New York City

Source: Uber Newsroom (2015) Source: t.Uber.com

uberX partner earning

9 9

Page 10: Professor Graham Currie The Uber Verdict

10

UberX growth has been impressive…

Source: Pocketbook, 2015

UberX Drivers Since Launch – US Cities

Uber Share of Australian Taxi Transactions

Source: Thompson, D 2015

Page 11: Professor Graham Currie The Uber Verdict

11

…but it has been a catalyst to significant service decline in the taxi industry

Source: Pocketbook, 2015

UberX Drivers Since Launch – US Cities

Uber Share of Australian Taxi Transactions

Source: Thompson, D 2015

Figure 3 - Average Trips per Taxi in San Francisco between January 2012and July 2014

Averagetrips

Source: Kwong, 2014

Page 12: Professor Graham Currie The Uber Verdict

12

Authorities consider uberX counter to regulatory controls and uberX drivers are being fined

UberX drivers hauled through the courts, as Uber appeals to public for support

Sydney Morning Herald 15-03-2015

Uber drivers face criminal charges

Australian Financial Review 6-02-2015

Victoria government issues $1700 fines to Uber ride-sharing drivers

Sydney Morning Herald 8-04-2015

Uber drivers slapped with more charges after ignoring orders

WA News Today 26-04-2015

Page 13: Professor Graham Currie The Uber Verdict

Agenda 1.  Introduction 2.  UberX 3.  Taxis in a Dry Climate 4.  Why Regulate? 5.  Assessment 6.  Futures

13 13

Page 14: Professor Graham Currie The Uber Verdict

14

Australian cities are a very “dry climate” for taxis…

Page 15: Professor Graham Currie The Uber Verdict

15

…they represent the lowest density cities for demand…

102

90

79

65

63

59

59

48

38

18

14

10

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

New York

Tokyo

Chicago

Singapore

Hong Kong

London

San Francisco

Paris

Berlin

Sydney

Melbourne

Brisbane

Urban Density

People per Hectare

Cou

ntry

Source: The Economist - Submission to the VCEC Inquiry into Managing Transport Congestion (2006)

Page 16: Professor Graham Currie The Uber Verdict

16

…and also the largest taxi operating areas in the world

Source: Charting Transport

Page 17: Professor Graham Currie The Uber Verdict

17

Taxi demand is highly peaked and also involves long distances and demand lows

17

Source: Harris L and Currie G (2015) Surge and Rescue: Can UberX surge pricing help solve ride shortages

UberX Surge Pricing - Melbourne

Page 18: Professor Graham Currie The Uber Verdict

1.  Introduction 2.  UberX 3.  Taxis in a Dry Climate 4.  Why Regulate? 5.  Assessment 6.  Futures

Agenda

18 18

Page 19: Professor Graham Currie The Uber Verdict

Taxi regulation balances fares/the number of cabs for commercial viability against agreed service standards

Industry Protections •  Set fare levels •  Limitation on supply

of cabs

Commercial Viability

Standards •  Passenger & Driver

Safety •  Predictable Fare

Levels •  Response Times

(fringe areas) •  Response Times

(peak) •  Specialist Services

(wheelchair, MPTS)

Service Quality

19 19

Page 20: Professor Graham Currie The Uber Verdict

UberX upsets this balance…

Standards •  Passenger & Driver

Safety •  Predictable Fare

Levels •  Response Times

(fringe areas) •  Response Times

(peak) •  Specialist Services

(wheelchair, MPTS)

Industry Protections •  Set fare levels •  Limitation on supply

of cabs

Commercial Viability Service Quality

20 20

Page 21: Professor Graham Currie The Uber Verdict

…and can act to deteriorate service quality in important areas

Standards •  Passenger & Driver

Safety •  Predictable Fare

Levels •  Response Times

(fringe areas) •  Response Times

(peak) •  Specialist Services

(wheelchair)

Service Quality

21 21

Page 22: Professor Graham Currie The Uber Verdict

1.  Introduction 2.  UberX 3.  Taxis in a Dry Climate 4.  Why Regulate? 5.  Assessment 6.  Futures

Agenda

22 22

Page 23: Professor Graham Currie The Uber Verdict

23

An uberX trip does not provide the same level of safety as a Taxi trip… §  Lower insurance coverage for

uberX drivers and passengers §  Lower driver safety checks for

uberX §  Lower levels of driver training for

uberX §  Lower standards for uberX

vehicles than taxis

Page 24: Professor Graham Currie The Uber Verdict

…but it does provide a great user driver rating tool

§  Lower insurance coverage for uberX drivers and passengers

§  Lower driver safety checks for uberX

§  Lower levels of driver training for uberX

§  Lower standards for uberX vehicles than taxis

24 24

Page 25: Professor Graham Currie The Uber Verdict

25

Fares are usually cheaper but where do the savings come from? §  Less insurance= lower cost §  Less training= lower cost §  Lower vehicle standards= lower

cost

§  What about TAX? §  Focus on high demand areas=

better revenue (but what about travel at low demand)

Page 26: Professor Graham Currie The Uber Verdict

uberX cuts Taxi service levels but focuses on demand peaks; what about low demand times/areas?

Figure 3 - Average Trips per Taxi in San Francisco between January 2012and July 2014

Averagetrips

Source: Kwong, 2014

Taxi Decline – San Francisco

26 26

Page 27: Professor Graham Currie The Uber Verdict

Wheelchair taxis – numbers of taxi’s constrain work opportunities for wheelchair users

Maxi Taxi Viability

Relies on a Solid

Non-Wheelchair market

e.g. Airport Access/ Tourists with

Luggage

27 27

Page 28: Professor Graham Currie The Uber Verdict

uberX has cut viability of wheelchair taxis in the US; what will happen in Melbourne?

Maxi Taxi Viability

Relies on a Solid

Non-Wheelchair market

e.g. Airport Access/ Tourists with

Luggage

Tota

l whe

elch

air t

rips

Figure 4 – Total wheelchair pick up by ramp taxi in San Francisco

Total wheelchair taxi trips

declined by 44%

between March 2013

to July 2014

Source: SFMTA TAB Meeting Sept 2014

28 28

Page 29: Professor Graham Currie The Uber Verdict

1.  Introduction 2.  UberX 3.  Taxis in a Dry Climate 4.  Why Regulate? 5.  Assessment 6.  Futures

Agenda

29 29

Page 30: Professor Graham Currie The Uber Verdict

30

Is uberX the end of Transit?

Page 31: Professor Graham Currie The Uber Verdict

Melbourne Grand Prix Transport Access

31 31

Page 32: Professor Graham Currie The Uber Verdict

Lets provide free taxis?

32 32

Page 33: Professor Graham Currie The Uber Verdict

All Taxis (3,000) = 9,000 event access trips

The Sums

•  3,000 taxis •  Say 3 person access

trips per taxi •  3 * 3,000 = 9,000

33 33

Page 34: Professor Graham Currie The Uber Verdict

Can we manage 3,000 taxis?

34

195 cars

390 cars

560 cars

Page 35: Professor Graham Currie The Uber Verdict

What about the other 191,000?

35

9,000

191,000

0 50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000

Taxi

Don’t Know

Volume of Travel

Access to the Melbourne Grand Prix

Mod

e of

Acc

ess

Page 36: Professor Graham Currie The Uber Verdict

PT = Volume and Efficiency

36

Page 37: Professor Graham Currie The Uber Verdict

37 37

Page 38: Professor Graham Currie The Uber Verdict

Low density “Social Transit” ; be our guest!

38

Page 39: Professor Graham Currie The Uber Verdict

Smart Transit agencies think outside the box

39

Transit runs the Car Share Scheme

Page 40: Professor Graham Currie The Uber Verdict

Some Transport Researchers see uberX as a part of “Modal Convergence” trend

40

Source: Enoch MP (2015) How a rapid modal convergence into a universal automated taxi service could be the future for local passenger transport’ Technology Analysis and Strategic Management

Page 41: Professor Graham Currie The Uber Verdict

My view – uberX Futures

41

UberX Futures

•  uberX has created wonderful innovations we should all be adopting and which we should encourage (app based booking; user driver assessment; surge pricing)

Its Time to

REGULATE

uberX [Data Access

Is a

Worthwhile

Objective]

•  uberX has created unfair outcomes for the taxi industry that need to be addressed

•  uberX will deteriorate taxi service overall which is NOT ACCEPTABLE •  “cool” and liberating smart

technology is no compensation for worse service in fringe areas or unemployed wheelchair users

Page 42: Professor Graham Currie The Uber Verdict

www.worldtransitresearch.info

42

Page 43: Professor Graham Currie The Uber Verdict

Join the ITS (Monash) LinkedIn group to keep informed of our activities

43