productivity and training

Upload: rahul-deshpande

Post on 05-Apr-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/31/2019 Productivity and Training

    1/128

    S

    T

    R

    A

    I

    N

    I

    N

    G

    training for

    productivity

    Leo Maglen

    Sonnie Hopkins

    Gerald Burke

  • 7/31/2019 Productivity and Training

    2/128

    training for

    productivity

    Leo Maglen

    Sonnie Hopkins

    Gerald Burke

  • 7/31/2019 Productivity and Training

    3/128

  • 7/31/2019 Productivity and Training

    4/128

    CoAc knowled gements.......................................................................

    Exec ut ive sum mary ........................................................................

    Cha pte r 1: Purposes of the resea rch...........................................Ove rview .................................................... ......................................................

    Justific a tion for tra ining ...................................................................................

    Aud ienc es for this rep ort.................................................................................

    Cha pte r 2: Bac kground to the research ....................................Ove rview .................................................... ......................................................

    Returns to tra ining ............................................................ ................................

    Othe r p rod uc tivity fac to rs..............................................................................

    Va riatio n in prod uc tivity leve ls.......................................................................

    Prod uc tivity me asures.....................................................................................

    Interrelated ness o f business p rac tic es...........................................................

    This resea rch................................................... ..................................................

    Chapter 3: Method ........................................................................Ove rview .................................................... ......................................................

    Ob jec tive s of the research p rojec t ...............................................................

    Sub -sec to rs............................................................. ..........................................

    The c onfid en tia l nature of the research .......................................................

    The c ase stud ies ..................................................... .........................................

    Prep arat ion o f da ta and ana lysis of find ings................................................

    Cha pte r 4: Footw ear manufa c ture .............................................Ove rview .................................................... ......................................................

    The c ase stud ies ..................................................... .........................................

    Ma nip ula tion of the quant ita tive data .........................................................

    Prod uc tiv ity results....................................................... ....................................

    Alte rnative exp lana tions of prod uc tivity levels............................................

    Enterp rise-based tra ining ................................................................................

    Enterprise dynamic ................................................... .......................................Sup port fo r bund ling .......................................................................................

    Effe c tive tra ining ..............................................................................................

    Som e te nta tive c onc lusions...........................................................................

    Cha pte r 5: Wire p rod uc ts manufa c ture .....................................Ove rview .................................................... ......................................................

  • 7/31/2019 Productivity and Training

    5/128

    Training ..............................................................................................................

    Prod uc tivity results............................................................................................

    Nature of the workforces................................................................................Enterprise dynamic ................................................... .......................................

    Som e te nta tive c onc lusions...........................................................................

    Cha pte r 7: Sup erma rkets ..............................................................Ove rview .................................................... ......................................................

    The c ase stud ies ..................................................... .........................................

    Ma nip ula tion of the quant ita tive data .........................................................

    Results ..................................................... .........................................................

    Inte rpret ing the results.................................................................. ...................Training effe c tivene ss......................................................................................

    Enterprise dynamic ................................................... .......................................

    The imp ortanc e of tra ining .............................................................................

    Som e te nta tive c onc lusions...........................................................................

    Cha pter 8: The c om para tive c ase-stud ies method ..................Ove rview .................................................... ......................................................

    The servic e ind ustry stud ies.............................................................................

    The ma nufac turing stud ies.............................................................................

    Constraints................................................... .....................................................

    Long itud ina l study ............................................................ ...............................

    Me asuring p rod uc tivity ...................................................................................

    Me asuring tra ining investment .......................................................................

    Infla tio n ......................................................... ....................................................

    Me asuring return to tra ining ...........................................................................

    A to ol fo r en te rprises .......................................................................................

    Enterprise dynamic ................................................... .......................................

    Cha pte r 9: Broa der horizons.........................................................Ove rview .................................................... ......................................................

    Returns to tra ining ............................................................ ................................

    Need fo r tra ining ......................................................... ....................................

    Policy .................................................... ..........................................................

    Profits and c omp et itiveness ...........................................................................

    Emp loyment .......................................................... ...........................................

    The shift to servic e-b ased industries...............................................................Training ................................................... ..........................................................

    Conc lusion ........................................................ ...............................................

    Referenc es......................................................................................

    Append ices.....................................................................................

  • 7/31/2019 Productivity and Training

    6/128

    AcknowledgeThe authors acknow ledge the valuable contribution of many p eople to th

    Firstly, the N ational Research and Evaluation Comm ittee is thanked for i

    without w hich the research could not have pr oceeded.

    Secondly, and especially thanked ar e all the comp anies, man agers and pe

    willingly and generously of their time, and w ho w ere prepared to share,

    successes, bu t also their problem s. Confiden tiality forbids identifying the

    does not lessen the au thors appreciation.

    Thanked th irdly are the mem bers of the project reference group w hose n

    and wh o looked critically at the m ain find ings and provid ed valuable sug

    assisted the analyses.

    Mr Carlo De Martinis, General Manager, Energy and Telecomm un ication

    Ms Elizabeth Fu gow ski, Research Officer, Engineering Skills Training Bo

    Mr Mike Long, Senior Research Fellow, Au stralian Cou ncil for Education

    Mr Edm un d Misson, Project Officer, Victorian Depar tment of Edu cation

    Dr Yi-Ping Tseng, Research Fellow, Melbou rne Institu te of App lied Econ

    Research

    Dr Lynne Williams, Principal Adviser Research, Productivity Commissio

    Ms Susan Wood ward , Executive Officer, Australian Light Manu facturing

    Advisory Board

    Fourthly, the helpful comments of an anonym ous, independ ent reviewer

    with ap preciation.

    Fifthly, we than k the ind ustry training ad visory bodies who gave their su

    Lastly, the authors gr atefully acknowledge the sup port of Ms Liz Dent, infind ings of the research and in the pr eparation of this report.

    Professor Leo Maglen

  • 7/31/2019 Productivity and Training

    7/128

  • 7/31/2019 Productivity and Training

    8/128

  • 7/31/2019 Productivity and Training

    9/128

    very effective training strategyon-the-job trainin g, especially in new te

    combined w ith m ainstream TAFE provision. For the rest, the correlation

    return of one-hu nd red-and-ninety dollars in value adding to one d ollar sagain, this appears to h ave been the result of investment in training as p a

    strategy rather than in isolation. So tru e expenditure w ould h ave been qu

    For the service-based ind ustr ies the m ethod was ineffective except, perh a

    hotel office personnel where p rodu ctivity (rooms booked p er hou r) sugg

    relationship t o training inv estmen t. The ineffectiveness of the meth od in

    might h ave been a consequence of the u niqueness of services, as typified

    accomm odation in top-of-the-range hotels, and the locality of sup ermark

    factors for which it was impossible to control fully. Hence, what w ere estprod uctivities really were set targets based on th ose differences. Notwith

    research found that senior man agers in each of the hotels and in the tw o

    wh ich p articipated in the research, considered th at the futu re success of

    dep ended on having p ersonnel trained both in technologies and in interp

    For manu facturers, training app eared to have d elivered increases in labo

    affecting w ork pr actices in a range of ways. Workers with more training

    their machinery better with less dow n-time; they w ere more skilled in se

    compu ter-based technologies, as well as more traditional prod uction meable to contr ibute more to innova tion. Possibly, there were benefits too, i

    between labour and management.

    The research along the way identified a num ber of shortcomings in und e

    app lying nationally recognised training:

    Managers and su pervisors, in enterprises with employees undertaking tr

    app renticeships, seldom had any know ledge of the training curriculum ,

    teachers from t he p rovider of the off-the-job componen t. The assump tion

    app rentice had a concern he or she wou ld ask. There was seldom an y co

    complementarity as a result of collaboration.

    Many of the man agers in the wire prod ucts enterprises had no know ledg

    competency stand ard seven that they existed. This reflects, in part, the

    the sub-sector has had in the past in establishing an app renticeship in spr

    A m ajority of trainees, especially in footwear man ufacturing N ew App re

    to be unaw are of the course they w ere enrolled in, or even that they w ere

    nationally recognised course. An instance was foun d too, where a p rivatissued certificates for training that had yet to take place.

    There also app eared to be a difference, in practice, in relation to recogniti

    Most firms in the stud y for wh ich ind ustry comp etencies were a tool, we

    prior learning as mu ch as recognising current competence. The comp eten

    was r outinely assessed: for those with p rior training it was expected that

  • 7/31/2019 Productivity and Training

    10/128

    same time as doing all sorts of other thingsthe m ethod accomm odates

    method , too, treats training as an ongoing investment that m ay be in a st

    relationship with skill loss, rather than as an isolated even t, the effect of wMoreover, by dealing with concrete examples, the relationships betwee

    hu man resource strategy, work p ractices and labour p rodu ctivity are fair

    attributes could make it a useful tool, not only for businesses for benchm

    also for governm ent in the p romotion of training.

    How ever, furth er testing would need to take place before it were promot

    business. It is also conclud ed th at the m ethod is generally ineffective in s

    industries probably because, here, there are many uncontrollable factors

    prod uctivity. Service-based enterp rises tend to d eliver a service that is u nways, such as location, comp etition and clientele, facilities, style, and/ or

    services on offer.

    Recommendation 1

    That the method undergo further testing in manufacturing and r

    indus tries su ch as information technology, before being promote

    as a tool.

    Enterprise dynamic

    The findings lend som e supp ort to the notion that enterp rises wh ich h av

    labour p rodu ctivity tend to have a bun dle or characteristics, which this

    a high enterp rise dynam ic; for example,

    y work p ractices that emp ower the ind ividual w orker to exercise jud ge

    respon sibility wh ile working either as a highly skilled specialist or as

    manag ing team in a broad ran ge of tasks

    y recruitment and tra ining p ractices that collectively ma intain a high le

    y encour agement of w orkers to identify with their w ork by receiving r

    form) for either high level or consistently good performance

    y hum an r esource planning that is a subset of strategic planning; busin

    concerned with qu ality enhan cement, client needs, and innovation, a

    market and other research

    Recommendation 2That any subsequent research on the method include furth

    investigation of the relationship between labour productiv

    training investment in the context of the level of enterpris

    Promotion o f tra ining

  • 7/31/2019 Productivity and Training

    11/128

    Tra ining sta nd ards and businesses

    Drawing in p art on feedback from em ployees, the research has highlight

    for operational personn el, of one-to-one, relatively inform al, work-based

    able to app ly skills within the context of a particular enterp rise. Firms tha

    on-the-job training w ith class-based teaching, and with assessment and r

    achievement against customised indu stry standard s, tend to have benefit

    investment in training. The research has also suggested that tr aining mu

    an event, but as something w hich is integral to the bu siness function by b

    everything that takes place. Furth er investigation into linking bu siness p

    formal and inform al work-based learning, off-the-job training, national trand custom isation, may be able to shed light on more and less effective b

    could assist m any Au stralian firms.

    Recommendation 4

    That ANTA give consideration to encouraging research tha

    business planning, innovation, formal and informal work-

    learning, off-the-job training , national training standards a

    customisation.

    Increasing training effectiveness

    As noted above, some firms, which have p urp ortedly been u tilising natio

    training, have not effectively linked learning on an d off the job. Collabora

    between firms and external training provid ers app ear to have been inade

    in others, personnel seem not to h ave been informed of the p otential for g

    qualifications through the training they h ave been un dertaking. It is possisolated instances wh ich were incidentally exposed by th is research. But

    firms which participated were more likely rather than less likely to be tra

    this seems imp robable.

    Recommendation 5

    That ANTA give consideration to mechanisms for ensuring

    collaboration between firms and external training provide

    they deal, and for ensuring that personnel undertaking anyrecognised training are made fully aware of that recogni tio

    associated qualifications.

    Rec og nition o f current c ompetenc e

  • 7/31/2019 Productivity and Training

    12/128

    1 Purposes of the res

    Overview

    This introdu ction outlines the pu rposes of the research add ressed by this

    broad social and economic context. It also identifies the perceived au dienoutcomes.

    Justification for training

    Tra ining effec tiveness

    As edu cation policy increasingly reflects a belief that learning for w ork sh

    lifelong end eavour, knowledge about the effectiveness of the various w ay

    learn is assuming growing imp ortance. Whether in p aid emp loyment or l

    wan t to kn ow that th eir valuable time w ill be utilised effectively. Furth er

    feel confident that their efforts will be rewarded through increased job se

    higher earnings, success in the labour m arket, and/ or a greater sense of s

    work they undertake. Other constituencies also have an interest in learnin

    Fund ing agents seek to ensure that the edu cational programs they sup po

    achieve the objectives set for them. And those who employ labour want t

    investing in their personnel throu gh training w ill strengthen their bu sineeconomic return. The p rogram of research reported here p rimarily add re

    At the same time, however, the report explores some possible implication

    government and for curr ent and p otential employees.

    A relationship betw een training and prod uctivity is fund amental to the e

    vocational edu cation and training system. This project has sou ght to dem

    Australian enterprises which provide training for their staff have benefitt

    prod uctivity. It has also sought to find ou t about more an d less effective t

    In particular, the project has been concerned to establish whether trainingpart of an overarching business strategy or wh ether training effectivenes

    the bu siness environment in w hich it takes p lace. Along th e way, some ad

    into work-related learning have been gained and these, too, are reported.

    Emp loyers and man agers are most likely to be convinced of the effective

    provid ed training w here the evidence is transparent Transparency is ass

  • 7/31/2019 Productivity and Training

    13/128

    Efforts of governments to engender a training culture are un derm ined by

    informa tion systems that recognise only the costs of training an d not its r

    culture wou ld value learning as increasing the stock of hu man capital. Buof hum an capital is the un derstand ing that it, like physical capital, can be

    prod uce a prod uct or service. Valuing potential depend s on m easuring re

    Furth ermore, effective business decisions concerning training are not just

    train or not to train, and if so, the quantu m of training to provide. In add i

    wh o learns, wh at is learnt, how and wh ere learning w ill take place, and h

    effectiveness can be optim ised. Business managers m ay call on ed ucation

    advise them on such matters. But for them too, emp irically based knowle

    strategy is imp ortant . And for both g roups, being able to evaluate the eff

    app roaches provides the opp ortunity to find out what w orks best in the cparticular enterp rise.

    Ideally, any method that is promoted as a potential management tool, sho

    enterp rise. This means being app licable to any indu stry sub-sector and to

    This research attem pts to evaluate a possible method in terms of the first

    investigating tw o manufacturing and two service-based sub-sectors. On t

    enterp rises that are investigated are, in the m ain, mediu m to large ones. P

    of the method to small businesses is, how ever, explored in discussion.

    Audiences for this report

    This report has been p repared for three major aud iences:

    v the fund ing agent: the report aims to d emonstrate that its contracted been met, with the rider that, subsequent to th e signing of the contrac

    National Centre for Vocational Edu cation and Researchs (NCVER) N

    Evaluation Committee ind icated in face-to-face meeting that the projeiterative. That is, the approach should be modified on the basis of exp

    adh ering rigidly to the p roposed m ethod. This was readily agreed to

    exploratory nature of the project. Nevertheless, the researchers have

    general intentions of the original proposal

    v vocational education and training (VET) auth orities (ANTA and Stateauthorities): from both a policy and a p romotional persp ective they h

    research that seeks to demonstrate a relationship between training in

    productivity

    v the VET research community: other researchers have an interest in comethod and find ings in relation to their own r esearch, critiquing them

    them wh ere appropriate

    Other group s who w ould be interested in the findings of this report inclu

    v enterprise managers/ owners w ho emp loy labour: as ind icated in the

  • 7/31/2019 Productivity and Training

    14/128

    2 Bac kgto the res

    Overview

    The research literature, as relates to this research p roject, is reviewed , and

    explained.

    Returns to training

    Emp loyee performa nce

    In a recent review of international research into the relationship between

    hu man capital and its return s, Blund ell et al. (1999) observe:

    Employers fully or partially fund the training of workers in the hope of gainin

    investment in terms of being a more productive, more competit ive and conseq

    firm in the future. In practice it is very difficult to measure this return[T]

    workers receiving higher real wages. These real wages have to be paid out of

    therefore should provide a lower bound on the likely size of productivity incre

    productiv ity gains are likely to be higher than thisThere are numerous diffi

    the returns to education and training for firms. In the first instance, it is extr

    obtain data on firm productiv ity, competitiveness and profitability. Furtherm

    in identifying empirical counterparts to general and specific training [whichhas as each d elivering different retu rns to the em ployer and employee

    whether and how much of the costs are borne by workers and by employers. F

    difficult questions regarding causality (does company training cause the firm

    performance or does a better (poorer) firm performance foster (require) expen

    Because of these difficulties, there is a paucity of studies that have directly as

    education and firm training on company performance.

    Barron , Black and Low enstein (1989) sought em ployer op inion on th e pro

    their workers at various p oints dur ing the first three months following trthose surveyed, training imp roved p erforman ce, with about half the retu

    received by w orkers.

    Bartel (1995) stud ied the em ployee records of a large company. Using em

    rankings, she found that ind ividuals wh o received training d uring 1989 w

    lik l t i i i th i f ki b t J

  • 7/31/2019 Productivity and Training

    15/128

    Effec t of tra ining on prod uc tivity

    Stud ies in th e literature w hich h ave sought to d etermine wh ether training

    prod uctivity levels by measuring them are few.

    Dockery et al. (1997) measured costs and returns for enterprises with ind

    using Australian case stud ies. They conclud e that there are returns, espec

    indentu re period, but that the retu rns are less than most emp loyers of app

    them to be. Returns can be increased by having app rentices spend more t

    requiring less skill. But they also note that employers prefer to recruit tra

    training their own app rentices rather than recruiting ones who have beenThis would suggest that em ployers expect to be able to accrue longer-term

    better apprentices than provided du ring the indentu re, giving an incentiv

    in higher-level skills for those they intend to retain post-app renticeship.

    Black and Lynch (1996) used a large longitud inal survey of US manu factu

    manufacturing firms, that provided training input figures for 1990 and 19

    man ufacturing, a positive association betw een enterprise pr odu ctivity lev

    by emp loyees in formal, off-the-job training, bu t not in service-based en te

    nu mber of employees who u nd ertook training app ear to have an effect inother hand , the findings suggested a positive effect of compu ter training

    of the service-based firms.

    Using p anel d ata for 36 steel finishing lines in the US, Ichniowski, Shaw a

    conclud e that the effect of training on p rod uctivity depend s on its being o

    complementary h um an resource pr actices. Their stud y is revisited below

    A survey of over two h und red Taiwanese automotive parts manu facturer

    1995) foun d value ad ded as sale price minus m aterials cost to be positiveboth the d irect cost of enterpr ise training and ind irect cost (back-filling et

    that $28 spent on training a worker on average retur ned $430. They also m

    point that the investment level assumes other resources such as increased

    wou ld not be requ ired to achieve it.

    Income effects of education have prov ided the main sou rce of eviden ce f

    enterprises from signalled ability and / or higher level skills and kn owled

    assump tion that the returns to individuals result from rew ard for higher

    contribution. Maglen (1993), and McNabb an d Richard son (1989) revieweAustralia in relation to the rest of the w orld. How ever, there are few simi

    add ress enterprise-based tr aining, and those that do, fail to p rovide a con

    Lynch (1992) using US survey d ata on youth found , for youn g non-colleg

    pr evious off-the-job training h ad a positive wage effect, but not cur rent o

    nor cur rent, or pr evious, on-the-job training. Krueger an d Rouse (1998) u

    stud ies of a US man ufacturer and a service based comp any th at looked a

  • 7/31/2019 Productivity and Training

    16/128

  • 7/31/2019 Productivity and Training

    17/128

    Breaking d own by industry sector at the 2-digit Australian Stand ard Clas

    Occupations (ASCO) level and comparing m edians, Rogers (1999) found

    mor e prod uctive than their smaller counterpar ts in all sectors except serv

    Variation between enterp rises remained h igh. Table 2 shows figures for t

    investigated in th is research project. It is app arent from th e figu res that th

    particularly for the smaller groups, are strongly positively skewed.

    Table 2: Annual labour productivity in four industry sectors

    Sectors Productivity levels ($0

    Small-to-medium sized firms Large fir

    Median IQR* Media

    TCF manufacturing 33.7 42.0 66.5

    Metal products manufacturing

    Accomm., cafes and restaurants

    44.9

    39.7

    33.3

    37.1

    79.2

    77.6

    Food retailing 29.5 21.4 38.8

    Source: Rogers 1999

    Productivity is defined here as sales (net of change in stocks) less materials purchases an

    *Inter-quartile range

    While firms have an interest in maximising their labour productivity, it d

    high labour productivity is synonymous with high profitability. Rogers fi

    enterprises (14 employees), that although they have relatively low labou

    enjoy high profitability. This he explains as p robably reflecting small bu s

    low capital-to-labour ratios. That is, small businesses as comp ared with la

    invest more in people than in advan ced technologies, and the latter they o

    buy. Both these strategies reduce up -front costs which is impor tant for sm

    low startup capital levels.

    Contrasts between pr odu ctivity and profitability u nd erscore the imp orta

    figures cautiously by being aw are of what is behind them. Case studies h

    providing insights into the complex of factors operating, including compa

    technologies. They also allow for greater control of variablessize and n

    service for examp lethat is, if the pop ulation of enterp rises available for

    sufficient numbers of ones that are, indeed , similar with respect to factors

    variables un der stud y.

    Productivity measures

    A further issue is the natu re of the prod uctivity m easure itself and how u

    Hilmer (1991) points ou t:

    Th f ll i i d d i i i h l i h

  • 7/31/2019 Productivity and Training

    18/128

    More practical problems are associated w ith traininggaining reasonably

    measu rements of it. Barron , Berger an d Black (1997) who com pared em pl

    hours of training for their employees with the emp loyees own assessmen

    former group reported 25 per cent more hour s of training than their work

    nu mbers of reported training incidents were similar. They conclude th at

    evidence for formal training being more accurately measured than inform

    surp rising given that the latter is less distingu ishable from n ormal w ork.

    deciding wh at deserves to be called training; another is firms recording o

    that provides comparability over time or with other firms. On the issue of

    interesting to note th at Krueger and Rouse (1998) foun d a p otential sourc

    ten to twenty p er cent of employees who had not taken training, reportin

    Then there is the issue of selection. As Ashenfelter and LaLonde (1996) po

    offer training to their employees rand omly; they prov ide it where they be

    the greatest benefit. That w ill usually be as p rodu ctivity improvem ent in

    through prom otion; but it can be for other reasons such as reward . This m

    with and without training difficult to interp ret. For those w ho look at w a

    wage levels can give misleading ideas of relative prod uctivity since wage

    are mor e comp ressed than are the associated p rod uctivity differentials (A

    1998). The result, incidentally, is that firms have an incentive to increase t

    workforce.

    Interrelatedness of business practices

    Strategic dec ision-ma king

    As discussed (above), business decisions that contribute to achieved level

    complex and interconnected. While day-to-day decision-making typ ically

    that a re amenable to small ad justm ents, strategic decisions in the allocatio

    and infrastructure, and about the core level of labour an d hum an capital,

    Changes in prod ucts or services may only take place through minor ad ap

    existing range an d dealt with in th e short ru n. But m ore innovative chang

    services constitute major bu siness strategy. Fur therm ore, decisions aimed

    maintaining levels of productivity and profitability through technologica

    the sam e time, involve substan tial risk. Yet it is innovative capability, eith

    an early follower, which is essential to the survival of many businesses.

    Dosi (1997) emphasises that d ifferences in this capability constitute a key

    winners and losers:

    [A] stylised fact emerging from studies on innovation and diffusion is the p

    in knowledge and problem-solving capabilities that firms embody, their relati

    together with wide asymmetries in performance, highlighted also by the persis

  • 7/31/2019 Productivity and Training

    19/128

    technologies and outputs. Less strategically directed choices about huma

    resources, on the other h and, even w here they includ e training for person

    deliver the same level of benefits. To illustrate, one of the research team w

    owner to explore why a p rogram of training pu rchased for people on the

    to have had no imp act on prod uctivity levels. Interviewing the p articipan

    great ma jority already had the skills delivered by the cour se. In fact, it ha

    others more p rodu ctive, but the effect would have been too small to be ob

    leveland m ay have been counteracted by w hat app eared to be alienatio

    of the others. This is not to suggest that the best training is narrow, highly

    In some circum stances it may be. At other times it will be broad -based bu

    the needs of the organisation.

    It follows that research into the effectiveness of enterp rise-based training

    examine wh ether the level of effectiveness relates to the amoun t of trainin

    whether provision of training results, at least to some degree, from strateg

    comprehensive business planning. At the heart of such an app roach is the

    imp rovem entin client service, in quality, in new ventu res, in the functi

    organ isation. Hence, these are likely to be characteristics of firms th at are

    and users of training.

    Huma n resourc e management

    Various auth ors over recent years have argued that the hu man r esource f

    enterprises cannot be d isengaged from the business settings in wh ich it o

    Arth ur (1994) classified hu man resource systems as ones aimed at reduci

    through tight control of workers and ones that seek improved performan

    committed, discretion-exercising personnel. In commitment-orientated fir

    controlling firms (US steel mills in Arthur s stud y), work p ractices requir

    decision-making by operational personnel. In th em th ere was a preferenclevels rather than bonuses; there was a higher prop ortion of skilled m ain

    workers; and training w as more likely to ad dress new skills, comm un icat

    solving. On average, too, decision-making and p roblem-solving were mo

    contrast, in controlling m ills, employee behaviour w as closely m onitored

    basis of outpu t. Engend ering a commitment to th e values of the organisat

    important. Arthu r found that prod uctivity as tons of steel produ ced p er l

    scrap r ate, were both more favourable in the m ills whose managem ent st

    committed em ployees.Greater p rod uctivity also was found by Macdu ffie (1995) to exist in US au

    emp loyed a set of related w orker-emp owering p ractices as p art of flexibl

    contrast to mass p rodu ction systems. Those practices integrated w ith m an

    that sought to redu ce inventories and stocks, and dem anded that operati

    skilled and adap table, team-based problem-solvers. Somewh at d ifferent t

  • 7/31/2019 Productivity and Training

    20/128

    than w here prod uction involved closely supervised, narrow jobs with no

    decision-making.

    A stud y that sought to examine the relation between hu man resource prastrategy in a service ind ustry is that of Hoqu e (1999). In a sur vey of over

    med ium-to-large UK hotels, Hoque looked at the m atch between busines

    hu man resource strategyexternal fit, and the synergy betw een the var

    pr acticesinternal fit. Each hotel was categorised as a cost r edu cer, qu

    other. Human resource management practices were taken to include sta

    conditions, recruitment that aims to ensure match to the values of the org

    culture, team work and role flexibility, focus on qu ality in w ork and meri

    Hu man resource outcomes considered in the research included organisat

    job satisfaction, sta ff flexibility an d qu ality of w ork. H uman resou rce pra

    enhancer group app eared to have been somew hat more effective in deliv

    resour ce outcom es; how ever, the practices were strongly related to the gr

    quality performance, although not its labour p rodu ctivity. By contrast, hu

    pr actices were jud ged as ineffective where cost-cutting w as the overrid in

    that had a hum an resource strategy and imp lemented their hum an resou

    coherent package, outperformed those that did not. Interestingly, for the

    this report, the other group behaved m uch m ore like the quality enhanc

    cost-cutter grou p. The lack of relation to labour p rod uctivity in any of thenoted and may have had som ething to do with the way it was measured .

    that the find ings lend su pp ort to th e importan ce of both external fit and i

    A fairly consistent p icture emerges across the stud ies, except for th e issue

    incentive and performance payment. McNabb and Whitfield (1998), usin

    the UK Workplace Industrial Relations Survey, found matching enterpris

    performance to the system of employee involvement in it to be comp lex,

    profit-related pay consistent with upward decision-making. Ben-Ner and

    the issue from a rights of ownersh ip persp ectiveownership of an assecontrol its use and to enjoy its returns. Worker empow erment p asses on t

    that control right, and various finan cial incentive systems prov ide for som

    retu rns. But w hether control is exercised in the interest of the organ isatio

    An ind ividuals high p rodu ctivity level might be achieved at the cost of o

    inconsistent with the interests of the organisation; broad -based profit-sha

    d iscour age the free rider. Recognition of high-level performan ce of emp lo

    an important ingred ient in bun dling hum an resource management practi

    best do it app ears to be problematic.

    This research

    Enterprise dynamic

  • 7/31/2019 Productivity and Training

    21/128

    For convenience, the above bun dle will be referred to as a high d ynam i

    low d ynam ic of enterpr ises wed ded to the status qu o of rou tine, closely

    the pr odu ction/ delivery of standard ised p rodu cts and services. The term

    been chosen in preference to innova tive work p ractices and high invo lv

    so as to captu re overar ching business strategy, and in pr eference to flexi

    manu facturing and the like in ord er to includ e service-based enterpr ises

    It cannot be concluded from the studies cited above th at the h um an resou

    dynam ic enterp rises will, on average, always be less financially rewar din

    dyn amic ones in the sam e indu stry group . Indeed, Macduffie (1995) expr

    that:

    Innovative work practices are likely to contribute to improved economic perfothree conditions are met: when employees possess knowledge and skills that m

    employees are motivated to apply this skill and knowledge through discretiona

    the firms business and production strategy can only be achieved when emplo

    discretionary effort.

    Albeit, there is increasing acceptan ce in Au stralia that the countrys econ

    dep endent on the growth of knowledge-based firms prod ucing high-qua

    pr odu cts and services (the h igh skills rou te of Finegold and Soskice 1988)

    that concentrate on long ru n, mass prod uction of identical outp uts ru n a out to copierspossibly offshorewh o are able to deliver the same ou tp

    cheaper price, or being displaced in the m arket by pr oviders of more inno

    services. Of cour se, as Finegold (1999) has recently acknowled ged, mass

    inconsistent w ith high quality, the achievement of w hich almost certainly

    skilled labour. But the threat from innovators remains.

    With these factors in m ind, this research r eport attemp ts to examine find i

    ind ividu al firms in the context of the conditions of the ind ustry sub-secto

    operate and their relationships to the broad er economy.

    Methodolog ic a l issues

    In choosing to employ comp arative m icro-stud ies to investigate the effec

    investment in training to achieve high levels of labour productivity, the re

    especially draw n on the w ork of Sigmun d Prais in the UK and his extens

    colleagues in Europ e and elsewhere. That work, that extended over nearl

    been review ed by Maglen and Hop kins as a precursor to this research (19

    within that program of research relevant here have been international com

    nu mbers of enterp rises that investigated labour p rodu ctivity and skill lev

    prod ucts/ services examined in this way and reviewed by Maglen and Ho

    v metal pr odu cts, in the UK, German y and Neth erland s (Daly, HitchenMason, Prais & van Ark 1992)

  • 7/31/2019 Productivity and Training

    22/128

    links learning and skills to w ork p ractices that in turn link to labour p rod

    stud ies the ind epend ent variable (as the pr oxy for learning and skills) wa

    academ ic and vocational qualifications held by personnel. In this research

    enterprise expend iture on training. At the same time h owever, it has been

    to collect information on recruitmen t so as to avoid the p ossibility of equa

    effects with training d ifferences that could m ore easily be explained by d

    qualifications at recruitment.

    The research p rogram of Prais and colleagues involved intercountr y com

    objective of explaining the (then ) low pr odu ctivity of the UK relative to th

    economies, in terms of a comp arative lack of skills as conferred by v ocati

    edu cation. In contrast, this research has been u nd ertaken only in one cou

    Certainly, two of the industry sub-sectors investigated are similar to ones

    work of Prais and colleagues. However, the objective has neither been to

    techniques nor to attemp t comparisons with their results. In r eality, the la

    imp racticable. Even if it were realistic to allow for the intervening period

    terms, changes in the natu re of prod ucts, materials and processes (manuf

    and in expected level and nature of services (service-based industries) wo

    comparisons. Furtherm ore, Prais and colleagues p ublished ratios of mean

    measures, necessitating access to unpublished data before any compariso

    mad e. In ap plying a comparative case-stud y app roach to enterprises withwh ere they are to be differentiated by level of training expend iture, the a

    this has any appar ent relationship to the level of labour p rod uctivity achi

    has been necessary to examine distribut ions rather than mean s. Of cour se

    colleagues u nd ertook comp arable studies within the country, but because

    research, did not focus on intra-coun try d ifferences. In one instance, how

    differences in qualifications between similar firms with in the UK as relati

    d ifferences (Daly, Hitchens & Wagner 1985). How ever, no information w

    relationship.

    Some au thors have su ggested that the observed d ifferences in p rodu ctivi

    could just as easily have been explained as arising from technology and m

    differences (Cutler 1992; Chapman 1993; Shackleton 1995), or cultural dif

    countr ies along with d ifferences in the associated attitu des to work (Khl

    The technology explanation has some validity in some of the comparison

    wh ere the au thors found little difference to exist. It also mu st be acknowl

    colleagues intentionally avoided controlling for technologies with the rat

    availability is a factor in decisions made by firms in relation to introducin

    explanation has m ore validity but wou ld be less applicable to comp arisoncountr y, as in this research.

    As men tioned earlier in this chapter , a precondition to stud ies of this type

    nu mbers of similar enterp rises in ord er to be able to m ake meaningful co

    colleagues had the ad vantage, with a few exceptions, of stud ying firms in

  • 7/31/2019 Productivity and Training

    23/128

    Germany, France or the US that are su fficiently similar in their ou tpu t, an

    is attempted to control for other va riables such as size, technologies and l

    There is also the problem of self-selection. It is probable that th ose who ain this study manage organ isations in which training is rated as importan

    conceived of as possibly importan t. While self-selection w ould not inva li

    between the stud ied enterprises, it may d isallow generalisations being m

    of a sub-sector as a whole. It also may m ean that the observed spread in t

    levels is likely to be skewed toward s the up per end of the popu lation d ist

  • 7/31/2019 Productivity and Training

    24/128

    3 M

    Overview

    The detailed objectives of the research are listed and the method used to

    explained. Additional information is given in the following chapters concindividual sub-sectors.

    Objectives of the research project

    The project has been u nd ertaken in order to:

    v determine w hether u se of case studies in Au stralia to compar e similayield a method for measuring the effect of training investment by ent

    levels of labour prod uctivity. The method was tested in two m anufac

    service-based industry sub-sectors

    v provide evidence to enterprises, government and other interest groupeffectiveness

    v develop the m ethod so that it could be used by enterprises themselve

    provide information on costing training and estimating retur ns

    provid e indicators of the need for and suitability of training th at c

    enterprise identify issues that m ight deter enterprises from u sing the m ethod

    that their concerns might be ad dressed

    explain the conceptual and practical issues relating to measuring pvarious indu stry sectors and identify factors in an indu stry or su b

    be considered in app lication of the method

    provid e gu idelines for interpreting tr ainings imp act on p rofits an

    suggest further research, in p articular into how the method might

    application by very small businesses, community service, primarysectors

    Sub-sectors

  • 7/31/2019 Productivity and Training

    25/128

    The chosen sub-sectors were:

    v footwear m anufacture

    v wire products manufacture

    v accomm odat ion sections of four and five star hotels

    v chain-based superm arkets

    For each of the three nat ional ITABs which were based outsid e Victoria, t

    Victorian State ITAB wor ked w ith the p roject team on behalf of its nation

    assisted in obtaining th e agreement of seven or eight en terp rises in each s

    par ticipate in the stud y. Enterp rises were selected with the objective of a

    comparability in relation to:

    v sizewith a preference for medium-to-large enterprisesit was conind ividu al personn el characteristics wou ld be more likely to yield aty

    small enterprises

    v locationall urban-based, and with th e aim of balancing costs againsof the project by having about two-thirds in Victoria and one-third el

    Strictly speaking, work sites were selected rath er than enterp rises. Hen ce

    be of one site of a firm th at operates out of a number of d ifferent locationdifferent case stud ies could be of different sites of the one firm. The latter

    sup ermarkets, each of which belonged to one of two chains; it also applie

    footwear stud ies, where each site was known comm only by different bra

    belonged to th e same comp any.

    The confidential nature of the research

    The project required and was granted the app roval of the University of MResearch Ethics Comm ittee. Given the sensitive natu re of the research an

    confidence nature of some of the material, app roval comm itted the team

    identities of the enterpr ises against individu al case stud ies in any r eports

    materials. Appr oval also comm itted the team to ensu ring that any survey

    anonym ous, and to requesting, in each case stud y, an opp ortunity to brie

    un ion repr esentative (if there w as one), on the p roject.

    The case studies

    Set ting up the c ase stud ies

    Initial contact was mad e by phone with the chief executive officer or hum

    man ager of those enterp rises that an ITAB had iden tified as suitable. The

  • 7/31/2019 Productivity and Training

    26/128

    The field work

    Each case study involved:

    v obtaining figures on a financial year basis for a series of metr ics, for th199798, and for 199899 JuneDecember (given that the case studies

    un der taken in th e second half of 199899). The metrics chosen were l

    value add ed, training expend iture and num bers of personnel with, if

    breakdow ns on nature of employment and target groups in receipt o

    app ear as append ix B wh ich is available on the world w ide web: see

    v gaining a profile of the enterprise through structured interview at ma(appendix C, see p.65) and, in all but one instance (where permission

    observation

    v discussion abou t the project with a union rep resentative or equivalenagreement of th e chief executive officer)

    v investigation of an y sub-sector-specific or site-specific variables to bewh en analysing the results

    v surveying p ersonnel (except in two instances where p ermission w as w

    voluntary, anonym ous w ritten questionnaire (appendix D, see p.65)

    Collec tion o f qua ntita tive d a ta

    In order to maximise the poten tial value of the case stud ies, it had been in

    collect a comp rehensive ran ge of quantitative m easures of business perfo

    soon became ap parent th at this would be problematic on tw o fronts: man

    advan taging competitors even where id entity is protected, and lack of d a

    accessible form w ith consequent m anager concern about the w ork that w

    extract the figures. Therefore, the quantitative data requirem ents of the reto concentrate on th ose metrics essential to it.

    In discussion w ith the p erson assigned to extract the d ata the following p

    v labour hours are the hour s worked d uring the year that have d irectlycreation of the output (tha t is, they exclud e annu al and sick leave etc

    provided for each sector in the relevant chapter of this report

    v labour tu rnover is the num ber of people leaving the site in a year; it i

    with d ownsizing, they might not be replacedv total personnel is the average total number of people employed at a s

    v outp ut is the total amoun t prod uced by the enterprise in a year measmonetary term s; further d etails are provided for each su b-sector in th

    this report

    v training expend iture is the amoun t spent by the firm on training bot

  • 7/31/2019 Productivity and Training

    27/128

    Ob servation of work

    This typically involved a w alk around the work area in the comp any of th

    manager (for examp le, manufacturing or op erations manager, executive h

    although in sup ermarkets the team member w as usually unaccomp anied

    preferable to observe work after rather th an pr ior to interviewing the man

    practices, as this led to a better un derstand ing on the p art of the research

    Sometimes personnel were invited to sp eak with th e researcher about the

    not at all sites. In the man ufactur ing ones, both noise and hazard levels ty

    an op erative would have to stop w ork before any discussion could take p

    some of the enterprises in the study set outpu t rates for personnel. The re

    concerned n ot to do anyth ing that might thr eaten their achievement, anddetriment of an operative. The escorting m anager in all cases discussed th

    researcher, and answered any qu estions.

    Questionnaires

    Questionnaires, along w ith postage-paid retu rn envelopes, were supp lied

    manager w ith a request that they be distributed to p ersonnel directly con

    prod uction/ service delivery process, typically operatives/ room attend anleading hand s, sup ervisors, office personnel who contribute to prod uctio

    (in fact, in m any instances they were m ore broadly d istributed). It was str

    instrument w as voluntary an d th at no pressure should be ap plied to pers

    It was stressed also that it should be mad e clear to personnel that answer

    and confidential and that the emp loyer w ould r eceive no information on

    return. Liaising managers agreed to sup ply a box to make return simpler

    coming back that w ay. Alternatively, respond ents could m ail their r espon

    Liaising man agers were asked to confirm the nu mber of qu estionnaires d

    absences and other changes in p ersonnel could h ave meant th at the nu mbprojected was n ot achieved (in tw o instances it was exceeded and add itio

    provid ed). Where there was a m eeting w ith a un ion representative, the q

    explained in terms of the above, together w ith its purp ose and content.

    Draft summaries

    Following each visit, a draft sum mary of the findings was prom ptly pr ep

    liaising man ager with a requ est for any changes, add itions or deletions, a

    satisfactory and return to the research team.

    Loc a l fac tors

    Case-study firms in the two manufacturing sectors compete in national m

    factors are unlikely to create significant differences in dem and for their p

  • 7/31/2019 Productivity and Training

    28/128

    4 Footwear manufa

    Overview

    This chap ter repor ts the case-study results for the light manu factur ing su

    manu factur ing, and an alyses them in accordan ce with th e objectives of th

    The case studies

    Seven footwear manu facturers agreed to participate in the p roject, two of

    sites associated with th e same compan y bu t w hich employed somewhat d

    Five of the manu facturers pr odu ced light-to-med ium-weight shoes and th

    footwear of heavier weight. The preference would have been to have eigh

    all in the form er category; bu t the small size of the ind ustry in Australia nproceeding with seven and a greater variation in prod uct than was first h

    In order to preserve anonym ity while prom oting ease of comm unicating

    fictitious nam e has now been allocated to each of the man ufacturer s. The

    Caress, Dream, Ecstasy, Felicity and Glamou r.

    Table 3 brings togeth er a few key characteristics of the enterpr ises, by wa

    Table 3: Footwear manufacturers: some enterprise characteristics (sumEnterprise Number of

    employees

    Mode of

    operation

    Claimed

    competitiveedge

    Planning

    Anodyne 100200 Production

    line

    International

    brand,

    responsiveness

    Five-year

    strategic plan

    Bliss 100200 Production

    line

    Brand

    positioning

    No strategic

    planningCaress 200300 Teams Flexibility,

    responsiveness

    Annual

    business plan

    Dream 100200 Mix of

    productionline and

    Responsiveness Goals set by

    parentcompan

  • 7/31/2019 Productivity and Training

    29/128

    Manipulation of the quantitative dataProduc tivity levels

    Manufacturers supp lied figures for outp ut in tw o formsnum bers of pa

    per ann um , and value ad ded per ann um as sales minus m aterials costs. S

    wh olesale prices; these had to be adjusted w here pr odu cts were going to

    includ ing the intermediarys mark-up .

    Each also supplied w hat was considered to be the hour s of labour p er ann

    nu mber of direct hours of work w ithin the factory that had gone into pro

    As well as the labour hour s of operatives and leading hand s or team lead

    includ e the hou rs of supervisors worked on the floor in the pr odu ction p

    Store and w arehousing hours w ere not to be included as they have more

    layout and external arrangements than the skilled natur e of the prod uctio

    of maintenance personnel were to be includ ed w here they contributed di

    The majority of manu facturers u sed outsour ced labour to prod uce some

    therefore factory output had to be corrected for this. After investigation,

    of 0.42 was settled on; that is, it w as assumed that m anufacturing one p ai

    up pers is the equ ivalent of making 42 per cent of a pair from scratch. A fi

    also for the p ercentage of outpu t each financial year that h ad utilised outs

    Some of the m anufacturers used p remad e soles while others mad e them

    assumed that the lesser value being add ed in the m anufacture of shoes fr

    wou ld be balanced by th e lesser amount of labour required. On th e other

    d ifferent levels of complexity in the ranges of the manu factur ers, both se

    sites, suggested that a raw m easure of prod uctivity as num ber of pairs pr

    could not be expected to deliver comp arability. Information w as neverthe

    complexity mix, in expectation that it wou ld assist interp retation of resul

    ratios were sought for prod ucts of low (for example, a simple sandal), me

    an average walking shoe), and high complexity (for example, a high-heel

    Prod uctivity levels were calculated for each of the three-and -a-half financ

    hour of labour and value add ed p er hour of labour, corrected for outsour

    applicable.

    Tra ining expend iture

    All manufacturers sup plied figures for total training expend iture as train

    non-management, and five of them for the whole of the enterprise as well

    represented w hat m anufacturers believed their costs to have been, based

  • 7/31/2019 Productivity and Training

    30/128

    Hence, what were p rodu ced w ere measures of average training expend it

    case stud ies), and p er capita non-man agement (all seven case stud ies).

    In ord er that figu res for 1998

    99 could be u sed, it was assumed that trainthe first half of the year would be mirrored in the second half so the figur

    The approach assumes that labour p rodu ctivity had been the same Janua

    previous July to December. This is a reasonable assum ption for value ad d

    involves some over-estimation of nu mber of p airs since making the su mm

    by m aking the m ore labour-intensive, winter one. (In fact, what was su pp

    case stud ies und ertaken toward s the m iddle of the year was the full finan

    Productivity results

    Ma in quantita tive da ta

    Table A1 (see app end ix A) provides the collected results for the various m

    decided to concentrate on the n on-management set, both because it is com

    justify ing t ra ining at non -man agem ent levels is a p rior ity for the VET sec

    that level, assumptions about distribution of expenditure are less problem

    across the four indu stry sub-sectors stud ied that it was not u ncommon fothe managem ent training bud get to go on one person, say for an overseas

    seen, however, that the tw o sets of figures, per capita and per capita non-

    very little.

    Figure 1 shows p rodu ctivity levels as value ad ded per h our of labour aga

    expend iture p er capita non-m anagem ent for that financial year. A correla

    0.714 was obtained. One problem is the outlying p oint to the right being w

    most recent period m arkedly increased the level of expenditu re and , pres

    yet to capture a r eturn. The other is the heavier weighting for some of thea consequence of a greater amount of data.

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    edperhouroflabo

    ur

    Figure 1: Labour productivity in value terms against yearly training e

    non-manager by the footwear manufacturers

  • 7/31/2019 Productivity and Training

    31/128

  • 7/31/2019 Productivity and Training

    32/128

    0

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    3

    3.5

    0 500 1000 1500

    Mean annual training expenditure per capita non-management

    Meannumberof

    pairsperhouroflabour

    Glamour

    Bliss

    Dream

    Anodyne

    Felicity

    Caress

    Ecstasy

    Figure 4: Average amounts spent on training each non-manager eachfootwear manufacturer

    500

    1000

    1500

    2000

    2500

    0 0

    Figure 3: Labour productivity in simple numerical output terms agai

    average yearly training expenditure per non-manager by ea

    footwear manufacturer

  • 7/31/2019 Productivity and Training

    33/128

    Figure 5: Labour productivity in value terms each year for each

    footwear manufacturer

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    GlamourFelicityEcstasyDreamCaressBlissAnodyne

    Estima ting return

    If it is tentatively accepted that a causal relationship exists between the am

    (within th e range 0 to $1400) by an Australian footwear m anu factur er on

    non-managem ent personnel, and the d ollar value those personnel delive

    estimate of the return on investm ent can be made. (On the basis of this re

    be dedu ced abou t add itional return throu gh investing more than about $employee.)

    The regression line in figure 2 has the form p = 0.0336 t + 7.17, with a stan

    wh ere training is the ind epend ent variable t and labour p rodu ctivity is th

    variable p.

    To estimate retu rn then for each $100 invested each year an average of 0.0

    per hou r, that is, $3.36. Over a year, assum ing 46 weeks at 37.5 hours p er

    $5800an average r eturn of fifty-eight to one.

    An alternative w ay of defining the pu tative training effect is to say that tr

    potential to increase prod uctivity as value add ed p er hour from about sev

    fifty dollars plus or minus, w ith two-thirds achieving v alue add ing levels

    forty and sixty d ollars (based on the standard error).

  • 7/31/2019 Productivity and Training

    34/128

    Alternative explanations of productivity levels

    Organisa tiona l d ifferenc es

    In ord er to investigate whether findings sup port or contradict alternative

    differences in labour p rodu ctivity experienced by th e m anufacturers, org

    differences, as identified through enterprise visit and interview, have bee

    A2 and A3 in ap pendix A list the major characteristics and produ ction ch

    enterprises. Potential alternative sources of the productivity differences a

    Nature o f prod uc t d ifferenc es

    Ecstasy and An odyne have both p rodu ced very w ell presented, heavier q

    rest have prod uced in th e light-to-mediu m r ange. While this is probably

    of prod uctivity Ecstasy has achieved, it is not su fficient to explain the d if

    the enterp rises. Nor is produ ct innovation a sufficient explanation. Neith

    performers h ave seen innovation in the r ange as a p riority nor, in the p as

    although it now sees innovation as important. But for the oth ers, where c

    have been viewed as essential this, presumably, has meant having p ersonthose changes. So prod uct innovation as a source of value ad ding cannot

    training , because it can be a precond ition to realisation of innovative idea

    Qua lity d ifferences

    Bliss and Dream h ave had a lesser qu ality emp hasis, while the four h ighe

    been most committed to pr odu cing a high qu ality prod uct. So, the trends

    consistent with th e prod uctivity differences bu t, like innovative d ifferencconsequence of training d ifferences.

    Ma rket d ifferences

    A small propor tion of the outp ut of Anod yne, Caress and Ecstasy is sold

    While this has expand ed th eir respective markets to a sm all degree, it app

    have been the cause of the high retu rn on labou r of the latter tw o, in par t

    seems more likely that it has been the emp hasis on quality that has enablto penetrate overseas markets. Domestically, all manufacturers operate in

    market that d emand s quality at a price.

    Enterprise size d ifferenc es

  • 7/31/2019 Productivity and Training

    35/128

    Work prac tic e a nd tec hnolog y differenc es

    Whether enterp rises have been team -based or prod uction-line-based doe

    d ifferences in pr oductivity. For instance, wh ile two of the three highest pmov ed to self-managing teams, the highest has not. For it, teams are gro

    work well together but they are closely directed with no expectation of se

    In terms of technologies, the pattern across the enterpr ises was a mix of n

    automated , comp uter-based machines and older m achines, requiring a m

    machine-setting techniqu es (table A3). The p roportions var ied, with Bliss

    highest p rop ortion of old p lant and Ecstasy the lowest. But p rod uctivity d

    easily explained for those in betweenfor instance, Glamou r had fairly a

    technologies but not high productivity. Rather than technology differencefor the different productivity levels, it appears that introduction of newer

    been a stimu lus to training. Such a pattern wou ld be consistent w ith find

    chapter 2). Hence, the lack of training investmen t by Bliss app ears to hav

    consequence of staying with established technologies. In contrast, it app e

    found it necessary to train heavily to gain maximum benefit from the tech

    introdu ced. On the other hand , Anodyne has viewed autom ation as a me

    need for people with high levels of manu al skill and th e provision of leng

    pr ogram s. Of course, this is not necessarily contradictory. Autom ation reskillssuch as program ming skills. And fewer p eople may be required f

    (although in this indu stry, reduction in w aste appears to be the sour ce of

    But it is questionable wheth er there is a reduction in the length of training

    wou ld d epend on the existing skills of operators.

    Lac k of routine ma intenance

    A failure of operators to perform rou tine cleaning and lubr ication can res

    incidence of breakdown and consequent reduction in efficiency. Even wh

    plan t, time is lost in changeover. The findings suggest that th is could hav

    some of the p rodu ctivity differences observed. Operators at Bliss, Dream

    in their rou tine servicing w hile those at the other four enterprises all adh

    simple maintenan ce rou tine. But again, the d ifference cannot be dissociat

    was claimed at Caress, the recent high level of adherence to this requirem

    result of training.

    Bonuses

    The enterprises cannot be differentiated on the basis of bonuses.

    Personnel differences

  • 7/31/2019 Productivity and Training

    36/128

    25 per cent. Others hav e been lower : Anodyne 14 per cent, Bliss 7 per cen

    and Felicity abou t 15 per cent.

    In terms of edu cational backgrou nd , figures in table A5 suggest th at Ecsta stronger general edu cation, particularly in maths and science/ technolo

    of the work of Prais and co-wor kers as a lead-up to this research, Maglen

    concluded that m athem atical and scientific or technological know ledge o

    provid e p rodu ctivity benefits. While qu estioning w hether th is has been a

    Ecstasys high p rod uctivity levels, it mu st be acknowledged th at the resp

    was low; it is possible that m ore edu cated p ersonnel responded disprop o

    the somew hat h igher level of schooling su ggested for Dream than for som

    manu facturers r eflects the higher prop ortion of responses from people in

    occup ying non -operational or oth er floor level positions (table A6). Ecstabenefited too, from a h igh propor tion of its workers being first language

    (table A4), assisting communication and reducing the need for English la

    The questionnaire asked respond ents to state whether th ey had complete

    enrolled in modules or courses that go toward nationally recognised quali

    example a TAFE award course) and to list the courses and the app roxima

    commencement an d comp letion (if applicable). It also asked them to give

    curren t job. In analysing th e responses, position titles were matched to lis

    example, a footwear apprenticeship was seen as directly relating to the titor team leader, and a Certificate in Office Practices to file clerk but not

    an Advanced Certificate in Information Technology was treated as direct

    and a Certificate in Hor ticulture to neither . A few responses required a bi

    instance app renticeship was taken as being in footwear. Footwear techn

    to be on the floor u nless apparent to the contrary, for instance in p rodu ct

    A6 summ arises the results. Caress and Ecstasy appear to have been sligh

    of their workers on th e floor app eared to have u nd ertaken post-secondar

    training directly related to the w ork that they p erformed . But again the ri

    the returns for Ecstasy.

    What is apparent h owever, are the small prop ortions of people in any of

    considered that they have u nd ertaken some or part of a nationally recogn

    particularly p uzzling given that six of the enterprises ind icated th at they

    un dertaking the national award courses in Footwear Prod uction (see tabl

    one return ed qu estionnaire referred to th emthe respondent claimed to

    the Certificates I and II in Footwear Pr odu ction thr ough recognition of pr

    and was now un dertaking the Certificate III. A very small number of retuCommu nications or Health and Safety but not as mod ules of award cour

    those were treated as belonging in the right h and column in table A6). No

    an ap prenticeship be interpr eted as m eaning New App renticeshipliste

    of those returns pr ecluded that explanation. Instead, the finding suggests

    little und erstanding of the relationship of some of the training they are un

  • 7/31/2019 Productivity and Training

    37/128

    Enterprise-based training

    Reasons to train

    Sum maries of what the general manager or d epu ty of each enterpr ise con

    pu rposes of training app ear in table A7. Their expressed v iews amou nt, e

    positions. The first, for Bliss and Dream , the basic position, justifies traini

    survivalenabling p rod uction to p roceed, to stay in bu siness. The sec

    position, as expressed by the other five, has training d elivering much mo

    survive. Purposes were elaborated in terms of growth of the business, pro

    and the like, and for tw o of them, Anodyne and Caress, the interests of th

    general manager of Caress said:

    We have got to deliver an investment outcome for the company. If we ar

    training we are doing it for a purposeWe need also to create opportun

    genuinely grow. There are so many people [employees] who dont see

    become brain dead and go through the motions [of work]. These are no

    each other. When we measure training we should be measuring both of

    the personal development as well as the company development.

    Certainly, cultural change was m entioned at Dream, suggesting some mo

    elaborated position and consistent with the very recent increase in trainin

    overall, the two positions align with the tw o p opulations of training inve

    the higher.

    Enterprise dynamic

    An associated issue for this research has been to establish whether find in

    training being most effective when in context of a bun dle of other p racti

    wh at has been termed a high enterp rise dynamic (see chapter 2).

    Work p rac tic es

    Three of the five higher t raining investors, Caress, Felicity and Glamour,

    work practices that are consistent with the first two characteristics ascrib

    enterprises: emp owering the ind ividu al worker to un dertake a broad r an

    exercise jud gement and responsibility, and team-based work with team -b

    solving. It appeared d uring th e indu stry visits that Caress was furthest d

    teams; they were nearer to the au tonomou s ideal than elsewh ere. So it is

    surp rising th at it seems to h ave gained a somew hat higher level of return

    t i i th h th th t B t E t h f ll h

  • 7/31/2019 Productivity and Training

    38/128

    Business and hum an resources strategy

    The fourth and fifth characteristics concern business strategy and its relat

    resource planning.

    In accord ance with characteristics that have been p roposed as being asso

    rather than a low d ynam ic, Bliss has not h ad a strategic planning p rocess

    Innovation, and research and development were rated not imp ortant an

    view was expressed that there w as a need for new id eas but there was no

    their generation or capture. Nor has there been any hum an resource deve

    (table A7), succession plan ning or system of skills recognition. Similarly f

    app roach has not been a feature. Research and development h ave not bee

    prod uct innovation has been limited to styling. As explained above, humdevelopment is now a prime concern but this did not app ly over most of

    research. Nevertheless, it has had a set of comp any stand ards that it has r

    match to the national training standards.

    For Anod yne, there has been a five-year plan that is now seen as failing t

    change. Research, innovation and development have been viewed as som

    An aging and long-serving workforce has meant hu man-resource plannin

    priority issue, although imm inent retirement of managers has generated

    succession. The comp any codified its requ ired skills in the mid-90s, as a btraining but th e relationship to n ational standard s is not known .

    Consistent w ith a h igh d ynamic, Glamour, Felicity and Caress have each

    thorough and forward-looking p lanning process. That has not m eant mo

    rather, each has sought to opera te cohesively and coheren tly. All saw res

    development with a small r and a small d as imp ortant, as part of the p r

    innovative products. Each also appeared to be customer conscious with

    key objective to d eliver value for m oney (table A2). Each has recently so

    strategically with su ccession at higher levels of the organ isation, and each

    development plans that link directly (Caress and Glamour) or indirectly t

    (Felicity). All three have adopted the national footwear competency stand

    them to the needs of the enterp rise. Caress has continuously monitored f

    has adopted the term recognition of curren t competency in preference to

    learning. In p ractice this has meant p aying a recruited qualified tradesp

    but n ot at the highest level until he or she is competent as per the custom

    Ecstasy, too, has seen r esearch and development as important, as a sourc

    process innovation. An imp roved strategic planning p rocess is considere

    improved operation where work in p rogress and outp ut of unsaleable ite

    drop ped . For it, too, succession p lanning is being introdu ced. N ational fo

    standard s at Levels I and II have been adop ted, customised to the n eeds o

    In general th en Caress Ecstasy Felicity and Glamou r can be d istinguishe

  • 7/31/2019 Productivity and Training

    39/128

    It would be counter-prod uctive, or indeed, dow nright foolish, to suggest

    mon ey on training is all that a bu siness has to do to achieve high labour p

    some might infer that the m ethod th at has been investigated in this resea

    by such an assump tion and therefore question the mod els validity. It is bpr ovides the an swer. Businesses are likely to invest in training as one tine

    strategy. Employers and m anagers in the case studies reported here w ho

    in this way , see it as an essential compon ent of their metap horical fork. T

    provided insights into why some enterprises, such as Ecstasy and Caress,

    somewhat greater returns for their investments than h ave, say, Glamou r

    Effective trainingGiven a set of coheren t business p ractices, a further issue is what sorts of

    effective for peop le on the floor. In the research rep orted here, as typified

    been a sequence of on-the-job indu ction training (which all the enterp rise

    and the on- and off-the-job development of competency against customis

    stand ard s at Level II, with Level III being und ertaken by tr ainers. Techni

    pr ogressed to the Certificate IV in Workp lace Leadership . For Ecstasy, cu

    footwear stand ard s have been those at Levels I and II; these have been co

    pu rpose short courses.

    The employee questionnaire asked in wh at ways the respond ent had lear

    job. Most people believed th at they had learn t their job by h aving another

    and / or show them what to d o (table A8). Few considered that they had l

    through courses or classes. Of course, this does not mean th at those who

    class-based learning foun d it to be irrelevant or ineffective; it may sim ply

    been offered w hat they th ink of as formal class-based training. But th e re

    for most emp loyees in the footwear manu factur ers, one-to-one, on-the-job

    delivered the m ost valued form of learning. Even so, there may be some ldem ands a more structured, class-based ap proach, such as is required for

    Ecstasy, table A7) and for program ming other computer-based m achiner

    In other word s, wh at app ears to have been most effective, has been semi-

    job, competency-based train ing supported by class-based learn ing, as req

    probationary p eriod app ears to have become p art of the recruitment p roc

    effective screening of the app licant w ho had , seeming ly, the greatest pote

    performance in the position. Ideally, formalised training takes over from

    indu ction as soon as the r ecruit is fully appointed.

    Some tentative conclusions

    Firstly, it appear s that differences in training investm ent have contribu ted

  • 7/31/2019 Productivity and Training

    40/128

    Fourthly, wh ere training has been coup led with a d rive for innovation in

    high p rodu ct quality, and/ or technological innovation, and routine main

    personnel, training h as contributed to their achievement.

    Fifthly, wh ere employees have a strong ground ing in m aths and science o

    well-developed English language skills these have delivered extra produc

    Finally, the research suggests that tra ining with in the context of a high en

    assisted firms in achieving high levels of labour p rod uctivity.

  • 7/31/2019 Productivity and Training

    41/128

    5 Wire p ro

    manufa

    Overview

    This chapter reports the case stud y results for the m etal and engineering

    products manufacture, and analyses them in accordance with the objectiv

    The case studies

    Seven wire products manufacturers agreed to participate in the project. F

    allocated: Ad ept, Brilliant, Crackajack, Dazzle, Elan, Flawless and Glister

    the case stud y interviews, Glister proved unable to sup ply the qu antitativ

    was d eleted as part of the project. Investigations at Flawless revealed th a

    only a small par t of prod uction at the site. Regrettably, desp ite checking ihas been unable to sup ply figures for outpu t and labour, specific to wire

    for outp ut produ ctivity estimates. Except for a sm all reference to it in pas

    deleted from the project. Brilliant withheld agreement for observation of

    participation in th e questionnaire comp onent of the stu dy. It required, als

    solely with one of the d irectors of the comp any. Adept was able to supp l

    two most recent years of operation. This has left five case stud ies for w hic

    are available for two or more years, with a shortfall in sup plementary inf

    them. They are more varied in size and th eir produ cts more varied than w

    preferred. To illustrate, if case studies were to focus on wire products, prbeen to have them all, say, in spring-making, or all in w oven w ire produ c

    Table 4 brings togeth er a few key characteristics of the five enterp rises fo

    quantitative data were collected.

    Table 4: Wire products manufacturers: some enterprise characteristics

    Enterprise Number of

    employees

    Mode of

    operation

    Claimed

    competitive edge

    Plannin

    Adept 2050 Mixed Skills Five-yea

    strategic

    Brilliant 2050 Single

    person

    Low overheads,

    responsiveness

    Two-yea

    strategic

    C k j k C ll l C i Fi

  • 7/31/2019 Productivity and Training

    42/128

    sizemicro businesses. Thirdly, there is a concern amongst many manuf

    given to supp orting industry-wide r esearch is not spent on the business a

    un acceptable cost. And fourthly, many of those manu facturers w ho d o no

    have been researched extensively over the p ast decade and so do n ot wisagain. Nor w as it the desire of the research team to concentrate on the lat

    likely to invest heavily in training, and so not give the sort of spread the m

    investigation d emand s.

    Manipulation of the quantitative data

    Produc tivity levelsManufacturers supp lied figures for outpu t in tw o formstonnes of meta

    value ad ded as sales minu s materials. Sales were wh olesale pr ices. Excep

    also passed on p ercentage waste figures.

    Each sup plied wh at was considered to be the hours of labour p er annu m

    nu mber of direct hours of work w ithin the factory that had gone into pro

    As well as the labour hou rs of operatives and leading hand s or team lead

    includ e the hou rs of supervisors worked on the floor in the pr odu ction p

    Store and w arehousing hours w ere not to be included as they have more

    layout and external arrangements than did the skilled natur e of the prod u

    hour s of maintenance personnel were to be included wh ere they contribu

    production.

    Prod uctivity levels were calculated , for each of the thr ee-and-a-half years

    metal processed p er hour of labour, and as value add ed p er hour of labou

    was also accepted as a prod uctivity measure in accordance with th e recom

    Hilmer (see chap ter 2).

    Some of the m anufacturers have sent out a small amount of their w ork in

    treatm ent; that is, special coating of some sp rings has been ou tsourced. It

    labour is assum ed to have been negligible and so no allowance has been m

    savings for man ufacturers are, of course, in p lant and equipment rather t

    Tra ining expend iture

    Manufacturers supp lied figures for total training expenditur e in various fsup ervisory/ technician and op erative; management and other; and total

    share between managem ent and non-management. From these figures tr

    as per capita, and per capita non-man agement for each enterprise. Again

    wh at man ufacturers believed their costs to have been, based on their r eco

    them established that each considered th at all major costs had been captu

  • 7/31/2019 Productivity and Training

    43/128

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    0 200 400 600 800 1000 1

    Annual training expenditure per capita non-management

    D

    ollarvalueaddedperhouroflabour

    dou bled. The app roach assum es that labour prod uctivity has been the sa

    in the previous July to December.

    Productivity results

    Ma in quantita tive da ta

    Table A9 (see app end ix A) provides th e collective results for the various m

    footwear, it w as decided to use the p er capita non-management figures. I

    footwear m anufacturing, expenditure on manager training app ears to ha

    exceeded that on tr aining of other person nel. For Brilliant and Dazzle the

    are significantly higher than the respective figures that exclude managem

    with footwear, training expend iture per manager p osition was not estima

    differences in estimating it was considered to introduce too many inaccur

    assumptions.

    Figure 6 shows p rodu ctivity levels as value ad ded per h our of labour aga

    expend iture p er capita non-m anagem ent for that financial year. A correla

    0.156 was obtained .

    Figure 6: Labour productivity in value terms against yearly training enon-manager by the wire products manufacturers

  • 7/31/2019 Productivity and Training

    44/128

    Figure 8 shows m ean nu mber of kilograms of w ire processed p er hour of

    annu al training expend iture non-managemen t. Again the scatter suggest

    very d ifferent to th e other four.

    When p ercentage waste is plotted against mean ann ual training expend it

    man agemen t, a rather d ifferent p ictur e emerges (figure 9). One partial exhigh labou r pr odu ctivity is that it is achieved by incurring a relatively hig

    Incidentally, and consistent w ith the p attern for training investment and

    the highest training investment (about $1,500 per an num per capita non-m

    lowest w astage (about 0.25%). As explained above, because of the predom

    forms of prod uction, includ ing Flawless wou ld be of questionable validit

    not been plotted.

    Given the par ticularly small num ber of case stud ies, and the somew hat in

    of Adept, it is only possible to speculate about a relationship between traand produ ctivity. There is less sup por t for reverse causality than for d ire

    correlation coefficients between annu al training expenditure per capita n

    value ad ded curren t year 0.516 and p revious year 0.412; and between cur

    following year 0.589 (Adep t exclud ed). (Correlation coefficients for cur re

    because they result from som ewh at different sets as a consequence of the

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    0 100 200 300 400 500 600

    Mean annual training expenditure per capita non-management

    Mean$valueaddedp

    erhouroflabour

    Adept

    Dazzle

    Elan

    Brilliant

    Crackajack

    Figure 7: Average labour productivity in value terms against average

    expenditure per non-manager by each wire products manu

  • 7/31/2019 Productivity and Training

    45/128

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14

    16

    18

    20

    0 100 200 300 400 500 600

    Mean annual training expenditure per capita non-management

    Meannum

    berofkilogramsofsteelprocesssedperhouroflabour

    Adept

    Dazzle

    Elan

    Brilliant

    Crackajack

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    0 100 200 300 400 500 600

    Percentag

    ewaste Adept

    Elan

    Brillian

    Crackajack

    Figure 8: Labour productivity in simple numerical output terms agai

    expenditure per non-manager by each wire products manu

    Figure 9: Wastage level of each wire products manufacturer againtraining expenditure per non-manager

    Brilliant

  • 7/31/2019 Productivity and Training

    46/128

  • 7/31/2019 Productivity and Training

    47/128

  • 7/31/2019 Productivity and Training

    48/128

  • 7/31/2019 Productivity and Training

    49/128

    wastage and reduced labour . So, given the jobbing