process parameter variations during the co … material/session_day 2/5.mudhoo.pdf · process...
TRANSCRIPT
PROCESS PARAMETER VARIATIONS DURING THE CO-COMPOSTING OF MIXED FILTERCAKE, BAGASSE
AND VEGETABLE WASTES
A. BHAWOO, A. MUDHOO, R. MOHEE
Department of Chemical & Environmental EngineeringFaculty of Engineering, University of Mauritius
1st International Conference on “Waste Management in Developing Countries and Transient Economies”
Mauritius, Africa, 5–7 September 2011
1
IntroductionComposting
Organic component of the solid waste stream is biologically decomposed under controlled aerobic conditions to a state in which it can be easily and safely handled, stored, and applied to the land without adversely affecting the environment.
2
In Mauritius, sugar-processing factories have problems with filter cake management:
Handling Storage Transportation
Introduction
Filter cake produced - 243,430 tonnes. Direct usage of filtercake - phytotoxicity and soil nitrogen immobilization (Khwairakpan and Bhargava, 2009).
Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions due to direct disposal to land (Ochoa George et al., 2010).
3
Filtercake Composting(Meunchang et al., 2005)
ObjectivesASSESS THE CO-COMPOSTING OF FILTERCAKE
WITH BAGASSE AND VEGETABLE WASTE
Determining the effects on composting parameters in three composting experiments with different masses of filtercake but fixed masses of the other two substrates
Monitor the time-domain variation of Temperature, Free Airspace (FAS) and porosity, Moisture Content, wet bulk density, dry bulk density, Particle density, pH, Volatile Solids, CO2 generation
4
SubstrateMix 1 Mix 2 Mix 3
Mass (kg) Mass (kg) Mass (kg)Bagasse (1) 16 16 16
Filtercake (2) 44 34 26Vegetable Wastes (3) 7 7 7
Total mass (kg) 67 57 49
Average Matrix
Moisture Content (%)
≈ 65.9 ≈ 65.1 ≈ 64.3
Average matrix C/N
ratio
≈ 24.3 ≈ 26.7 ≈ 29.6
Methodology
6
Methodology
Monitoring Procedures
Bulk Density DeterminationBulk Density Determination
Daily Temperature monitoringDaily Temperature monitoring
Moisture ContentMoisture ContentFree Airspace TestFree Airspace Test
Respiration Rate Tests ,pH
Respiration Rate Tests ,pH
Volatile Solids, Average Specific Gravity
Volatile Solids, Average Specific Gravity
8
Methodology
Average Compost Particle Density of substrates
Liquid Hexane displacement method100mL Liquid hexane +5 to 10g ground dried sampleMettler PM400 balance
Formula
9
Methodology
Free Airspace (FAS) and Porosity measurement
Formulaic method to measure porosity Porosity = (1-(Dry Bulk Density)/(Particle Density)×100%
Free airspace of compost.FAS = Porosity – MC volumetric
MC volumetric = (BDwet × MCwet)/(Density of water)
10
Results and Discussions
Temperature
Mix 1 ‐ 54.5°C – Day 4 Mix 2 ‐ 59.4°C – Day 3Mix 3 ‐ 52.0oC – Day 2 11
Results and Discussions
Wet basis moisture content
Mix 1 ‐ (65.9 ‐51.2)%Mix 2 ‐ (65.1 ‐ 51.7)%Mix 3 ‐ (64.3 ‐52.3)%
12
Results and Discussions
Wet bulk density
Mix 1 ‐ (202.62 – 708.83) kg/m3
Mix 2 ‐ (197.94 – 583.79 ) kg/m3
Mix 3 ‐ (169.14 – 474.26) kg/m3
13
Results and Discussions
Particle density of composting materials
Mix 1 (821 – 1835) (kg/m3)Mix 2 (1055 – 1998) (kg/m3)Mix 3 (416 – 1544) (kg/m3) 15
Results and Discussions
Porosity variation within compost matrix
Net decrease
Mix 1 ‐ 20.30 %Mix 2 ‐ 22.08 %Mix 3 ‐ 25.41 %
16
Results and Discussions
FAS variation within composting matrix
Net decrease
Mix 1 ‐ 43.40 %Mix 2 ‐ 38.69 %Mix 3 ‐ 38.49 %
17
Results and Discussions
pH measurements
Mix 1 ‐ (65.9 ‐51.2)%Mix 2 ‐ (65.1 ‐51.7)%Mix 3 ‐ (64.3 ‐52.3)%
18
Results and Discussions
Volatile solids measurements
Mix 1 ‐ (69.27)%Mix 2 ‐ (57.76)%Mix 3 ‐ (62.48)%
19
Results and Discussions
Carbon dioxide generation
Mix ‐ 1 39.82 mgCO2.C/day.gVSMix ‐ 2 43.86 mgCO2.C/day.gVS Mix ‐ 3 36.98 mgCO2.C/day.gVS
20
Interim Conclusions
• Qualitative and quantitative data for physical parameters were as per typical parameter behavior and range of values, respectively.
• Potential for production of commercial compost by diverting them to a compost facility.
• A 5-week composting period is normally required
Bhawoo, A.,Mudhoo, A. and Mohee, R., 2011. Process parameter variations during co–composting of filtercake, bagasse and vegetable wastes. Proceedings Mauritius 2011, 1stInternational Conference on Waste Management in Developing Countries and Transient Economies, Mauritius, 5–9 September 2011. (Full Length Research Paper/Oral)
21
Interim Conclusions
• Filter cake can be composted with various proportions of bagasse and vegetable wastes
• Potential use as soil conditioner.
Bhawoo, A.,Mudhoo, A. and Mohee, R., 2011. Process parameter variations during co–composting of filtercake, bagasse and vegetable wastes. Proceedings Mauritius 2011, 1stInternational Conference on Waste Management in Developing Countries and Transient Economies, Mauritius, 5–9 September 2011. (Full Length Research Paper/Oral)
22
NEEDS FOR FURTHER STUDY ‐ Nutrient contents; Phytotoxicity assays; Fate and mobility/bioavailability of Heavy metals;
Details of impact on soil structure
References• KHWAIRAKPAM, M. AND BHARGAVA, R., 2009. Bioconversion of filter mud using vermicomposting
employing two exotic and one local earthworm species. Bioresource Technology, 100, 5846-5852
• MEUNCHANG, S., PANICHSAKPATANA, S. AND WEAVER, R.W., 2005. Co-composting of filter cake and bagasse; by-products from a sugar mill. Bioresource Technology, 96(4), 437-442
• MUDHOO, A. AND MOHEE, R., 2007. Overall heat transfer coefficients in organic substrates composting. Journal of Environmental Informatics, 9(2), 87–99.
• OCHOA GEORGE, P.A., CABELLO ERAS, J.J., SAGASTUME GUTIERREZ, A., HENS, L. AND VANDECASTEELE, C., 2010. Residue from Sugarcane Juice Filtration (Filter Cake): Energy Use at the Sugar Factory. Waste and Biomass Valorization, 1(4), 407-413
23