problems and trends in the therapy with antibacterial drugs otto cars. m.d., ph.d. department of...
TRANSCRIPT
Problems and trends in the therapy with antibacterial drugs
Otto Cars. M.D., Ph.D.Department of Infectious Diseases,
Uppsala University HospitalUppsala,Sweden
Problems and trends in the therapy with antibacterial drugs
Otto Cars. M.D., Ph.D.Department of Infectious Diseases,
Uppsala University HospitalUppsala,Sweden
Natural compounds - screening for microbial metabolites
Chemical synthesis
Semithythetic process - introcuction of new substituents - replacement of side chains
Traditional methods for development of antibacterials
Traditional methods for development of antibacterials
Sulphonamides
Tetracyclines
PenicillinsAminoglycosides
Macrolides
Glycopeptides
Streptogramins
Chloramphenicol
Quinolones
Trimetoprim
Lincosamides
1930´s 1940´s 1950´s 1960´s 1970’s 1980´s 1990´s 2000´s
Oxazolidinones
Introduction of New Antibiotic ClassesIntroduction of New Antibiotic Classes
Development of ß-lactam antibiotics
”One can think of the middle of the 20 th century as the end of one of the most important social events in history : the virtual elimination of the infectious diseases as a significant factor in social life”
Sir MacFarland Burnett, Natural History of Infectious
Diesease, 1962
”One can think of the middle of the 20 th century as the end of one of the most important social events in history : the virtual elimination of the infectious diseases as a significant factor in social life”
Sir MacFarland Burnett, Natural History of Infectious
Diesease, 1962
”The war against infectious diseases has been won ”
U.S. Surgeon General, 1969
”The war against infectious diseases has been won ”
U.S. Surgeon General, 1969
The annual death toll from infectious diseases is now more than 17 million
Many diseases thought to have been brought under control are strongly resurgent
The annual death toll from infectious diseases is now more than 17 million
Many diseases thought to have been brought under control are strongly resurgent
TODAY:
Leading infectious killers
Deaths (millions) <5 years old >5 years old
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
ARI AIDS Diarrhoea TB Malaria Measles
. 1998 estimate,WHO
• Temperature and moisture• Globalization of food production• Agricultural intensification• Overpopulation, urbanization• Frequency and nature of interpersonal contact• Population mobility• Sanitation, poverty• Access to health care and drugs
Changing epidemiological environmentBiological,social and economical determinants:Changing epidemiological environmentBiological,social and economical determinants:
World Health Organization Working Groups on Anti-infective therapy in collaboration with the Pharmaceutical Industry
• Research& Development
• Drug Quality -Counterfeit medicines
• Drug accessibility
World Health Organization Working Groups on Anti-infective therapy in collaboration with the Pharmaceutical Industry
• Research& Development
• Drug Quality -Counterfeit medicines
• Drug accessibility
”New drugs and vaccines are needed for emerging diseases..”
”Return on capital invested … is often too small to become an incentive for investment by the R&D based pharmaceutical industry”
”…a complex task that cannot be achieved without the cooperation and coordination by the WHO, the international financial institutions, national governments ,bilateral aid agencies ,the private sector and other stakeholders”
Marketing
Use and misuse New antibiotics
Resistance
Antibacterial spectrum
Pharmacokinetics
Toxicity
23F Resistant pneumococcal clones
Tennessee
Cleveland
Mexico
Colombia
Brazil
ArgentinaUruguay
Chile South Africa
SingaporeMalaysia
ThailandPhilippines
Hong KongTaiwan
South KoreaSpain
FranceBM42001978 ?
Finland
The Alexander Project 1998: S. pneumoniae, Pen-I and Pen-R
The Alexander Project 1998: S. pneumoniae, Pen-I and Pen-R
UK 20%UK
20%
Belgium 8%
Belgium 8%
France 53.3%France 53.3%
Germany 7.2%
Germany 7.2%
Czech Rep
7.1%
Czech Rep
7.1%
Poland 9%
Poland 9%
Switzerland 14.5%
Switzerland 14.5%
Italy9%Italy9%
Portugal 17.1%
Portugal 17.1%
Eire 32.8%
Eire 32.8%
Greece 31.6%Greece 31.6%
Netherlands 3.2%
Netherlands 3.2%
Slovakia 51.4%
Slovakia 51.4%
Austria12.4%Austria12.4%
Percentage of hospital Staphylococcus aureus that are multi-drug resistant
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
China, Centre 2
Japan
USA >500 beds
China, Centre 1
Hong Kong
Malaysia
USA, <500 beds
Belgium
Australia
Philippines
Viet Nam
Fiji
New Zealand
Compilation of data from published and unpublished sources ( WHO)
Primary Drug Resistance in Tuberculosis
Dominican RepublicLatvia
Russia (Ivanovo Oblast)Estonia
Sierra LeoneBolivia
Puerto RicoPeru
Portugal
United States of AmericaSwaziland
CubaNepal
RomaniaSpain (Barcelona)
LesothoBrazil
England & Wales
New ZealandBotswanaScotland
Northern IrelandZimbabwe
Czech Republic
Argentina
Kenya
Republic of Korea
China (Henan province)
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
MDR
Any other
Susceptible
Engl. &Wales
USA
Latvia
Czech Rep
Anti-tuberculosis drug resistance in the world. WHO 1997
Trends in antimicrobial resistance in Shigella dysenteriae
(type 1 isolates from Bangladesh)
0102030405060708090
100
Percent of resistant isolates
87 88 89 90 91 92
Year
Ampicillin Cotrimoxazole Nalidixic acid
Sack et al. Clin Infect Dis 1997;24(Suppl 1):S102-5
Prognosis and costs for treatment of bacteriemic patients with vancomycin resistant enterococci (VRE) in comparison to susceptible enterococci (VSE)
Prognosis and costs for treatment of bacteriemic patients with vancomycin resistant enterococci (VRE) in comparison to susceptible enterococci (VSE)
VSE VRE
Mortality 41% 76%
Hospital stay (days) 16.7 34.8
Cost per treatment period (USD) 56.707 83.897
Storsor et al Arch Intern Med 1998:158,522
Veterinary medicine
Human medicine
Agriculture
Community
Hospital
ANTIBIOTIC ECOSYSTEMS
Animal feed additives
Plant protection
Treatment & prophylaxis
EnvironmentEnvironment
•Intraspecies•Interspecies•Dynamics
Spread
Selection/Gene amplification
Genetic exchange
Colonization Infection
Host 1 Host 2
•Virulence factors•Host defence•Antibiotics
•Epidemigenicity•Vectors•Fitness cost•Overcrowding
•Antibiotic class•Specific drugs•Dosage regimen
• Variable epidemiology
• Regional differences
• Co-selection
• Clonal spread
• Herd immunity
• Few longitudinal studies
Difficulties in establishing a correlation between levelsof consumption and
resistance
Influence of antibiotic class on PRPcarriage
None - 1.0 - -
-lactam 1 or 2 6.75 1.8–25 0.005 3 6.00 1.4–25 0.013
Co-trimoxazole 1 or 2 7.22 1.7–30 0.007
3 13.14 3.1–55 0.000Erythromycin 1 or 2 8.56 1.1–64 0.037
3 12.16 1.9–75 0.007
The odds for co-trimoxazole and erythromycin being associatedwith PRP carriage were twice that for -lactams in associationwith 3 or more antimicrobial courses
Arason, 1996
Antibiotic Courses in Odds 95% CI p valuelast 12 mos ratio
The association between antibiotic use and resistance
• The introduction of an antibiotic is with few
exceptions followed by an increase in resistance levels
• Antibiotic resistant isolates are selected during therapy
• Higher resistance levels are often found in environments
with high antibiotic exposure (e.g. ICU,day care centres)
• In general, countries with low consumption levels
show lower reistance rates
Development of Resistance During Antimicrobial Therapy
Development of Resistance During Antimicrobial Therapy
•173 clinical studies (U.S. and Europe)• Overall rate of resistance during therapy = 4%
for all organisms• Significantly higher rates: penicillins, aminoglycosides• Significantly lower rates: imipenem, aztreonam
combination therapy• 68.5% of organism developing resistance were
associated with treatment failure
Fish et al, Pharmacotherapy 15, 1995:279
Need for new antibacterial agentsNeed for new antibacterial agents
• Pharmacokinetic/ Pharmacodynamics in drug Development and Evaluation
• Definition of antibotic susceptibility and resistance
• Design of clinical trials
• Pharmacokinetic/ Pharmacodynamics in drug Development and Evaluation
• Definition of antibotic susceptibility and resistance
• Design of clinical trials
Antibiotic Microorganism
Host
PHARMACO-KINETICS
PHARMACO-DYNAMICS
HOST DEFENCE
• A variety of micoorganisms containing the drug receptor
• Misleading kinetics in small animals
• Co-variation between pharmacokinetic parameters
• Poorly discriminating (discontinuous) end-points for efficacy
• Interaction with host defences
• Other patient factors
• Exclusion of resistant bacteria from clinical trials
• Ethical limitations for dose-finding studies
Difficulties in determining of optimal dosage
regimens for for anti-infective agents
Difficulties in determining of optimal dosage
regimens for for anti-infective agents
Pharmacokinetic/ Pharmacodynamics in Drug Development and Evaluation
Pharmacokinetic/ Pharmacodynamics in Drug Development and Evaluation
Over the last 10 years, a series of key concepts have emerged
• Dose -effect relationships are not the same for all anti- infectives
• Some anti-infectives are time dependent, others not
• Subinhibitory effects, post-antibiotic effects, cooperation with host defenses modulate the activity of antiinfective drugs
• Integration of pharmacodynamics/pharmacokinetics is a tool to predict success or failure, and emergence of resistance
Optimal antibiotic dosage
Costs
EfficacyToxicity
Resistance
• Basic in vitro pharmacodynamics • Determination of PK/PD vs efficacy - in vitro models - animal models • Protein binding • Human pharmacokinetics • Exploring tentative dosage regimens based on PK/PD indices and using human kinetics -in vitro models -animal models • Set dose/dosage ranges for Phase II• Validation of PK/PD indices in clinical trials
• Basic in vitro pharmacodynamics • Determination of PK/PD vs efficacy - in vitro models - animal models • Protein binding • Human pharmacokinetics • Exploring tentative dosage regimens based on PK/PD indices and using human kinetics -in vitro models -animal models • Set dose/dosage ranges for Phase II• Validation of PK/PD indices in clinical trials
Daptomycin:Pharmacokinetics/Toxicity RelationshipDaptomycin:Pharmacokinetics/Toxicity Relationship
Is skeletal muscle toxicity related to C max and/or AUC?
What is the safe dosing regimen?
Daptomycin: Effect of Dosing Regimen on Muscle Toxicity in Dogs
Daptomycin: Effect of Dosing Regimen on Muscle Toxicity in Dogs
Dose
(mg/kg)
Frequency ofTreatment
Peak SerumCPK*
MicroscopicMyopathy**
0 q8h 265 0/28
25 q24h 990 3/28
75 q24h 990 8/28
25 q8h 4000 15/28
* Blood samples at time of expected peak muscle toxicity, i.e., 2 hours post-dose** Minimal degeneration/inflammation in skeletal muscle sites; no myopathy in the heart
Selection is a key factor driving the spread of resistant pathogens
Bacteriologicalfailure
Multiresistant strains survive and multiply
Spread ofmultiresistant bacteria
Risk of clinical failureDelayed responseComplications
Low dose and long duration of beta-lactam therapy as risk factors for penicillin-resistant
pneumococcal carriage
Low dose and long duration of beta-lactam therapy as risk factors for penicillin-resistant
pneumococcal carriage
Odds ratio Confidence interval
Oral ß-lactams 3.0 1.1–8.3in past 30 days
Dose lower than 5.9 2.1–16.7 clinically recommended
Treatment >5 days 3.5 1.3–9.8
NB. Data are based on 16 children carrying PRSP (of 864). Ten of these children had low dose, long duration treatment
Guillemot et al. JAMA 1998;279:365–370
• Pharmacokinetically oriented
• Not always taking protein binding into account
• Looking at all antibiotics as one class
• Stay above MIC as long as possible
• But--patients want b.i.d. or once daily!!
Development of antibiotic dosage regimens
Yesterday:
Development of antibiotic dosage regimens
Yesterday:
• Pharmacodynamic goal of therapy
• Develop more precise relationships
between drug exposure and outcome
Development of antibiotic dosage regimens
Tomorrow:
Development of antibiotic dosage regimens
Tomorrow:
• Pharmacokinetic/ Pharmacodynamics in drug Development and Evaluation
• Definition of antibotic susceptibility and resistance
• Design of clinical trials
• Pharmacokinetic/ Pharmacodynamics in drug Development and Evaluation
• Definition of antibotic susceptibility and resistance
• Design of clinical trials
≤0,25 0,5 1 2 4 8 16 32 64 ≤1280
20
40
60
80
100
120
Ceftazidime (mg/l)
SRGA NCCLS
Swedish ICU study 1997
Escherichia coli
Swedish ICU study group
• What is resistance?
• In vitro veritas?
-Microbiological resistance vs clinical resistance
-Interpretataion of susceptibility testing:the breakpoint problem
• What is resistance?
• In vitro veritas?
-Microbiological resistance vs clinical resistance
-Interpretataion of susceptibility testing:the breakpoint problem
• Pharmacokinetic/ Pharmacodynamics in drug Development and Evaluation
• Definition of antibotic susceptibility and resistance
• Design of clinical trials
• Pharmacokinetic/ Pharmacodynamics in drug Development and Evaluation
• Definition of antibotic susceptibility and resistance
• Design of clinical trials
”Clinical trials of efficacy are presently
almost entirely funded by the
pharmaceutical industry and have
objectives largely confined to satisfying
regulatory authorities ”
Opinion of the Scientific Steering Committee on Antimicrobial
Resistance,
28 May 1999
”Clinical trials of efficacy are presently
almost entirely funded by the
pharmaceutical industry and have
objectives largely confined to satisfying
regulatory authorities ”
Opinion of the Scientific Steering Committee on Antimicrobial
Resistance,
28 May 1999
• Poor diagnostic tools
• Poor endpoints in clinical trials
• Poor knowledge about which patients really benefit from antibiotic treatment
• Poor diagnostic tools
• Poor endpoints in clinical trials
• Poor knowledge about which patients really benefit from antibiotic treatment
Slide no 47
Spontaneous cure vs. antibiotic treatment
Spontaneous cure vs. antibiotic treatment
Time
Spontaneous clinical cureCure with antibiotic treatment
0
100
50
% p
atie
nts
Slide no 48
The ‘Pollyanna phenomenon’
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Bacteriologic efficacyin bacterial AOM
Clinical efficacyin bacterial AOM
Placebo
Adapted from Marchant et al. J Pediat 1992;120:72–77
Eff
icac
y (%
)
Short Long
where is the balance?
Poor efficacy Emergence of resistance
Treatment time-
Problems related with the discovery and use of new antibacterials
Problems related with the discovery and use of new antibacterials
1. Finding a target for maximal efficacy
2. Avoiding toxicity
3. Optimizing usage
4. Preventing the further emergence of resistance
1. Finding a target for maximal efficacy
2. Avoiding toxicity
3. Optimizing usage
4. Preventing the further emergence of resistance
CLASSIC
ANTIBIOTICS”New” antibiotics
”Genomics”
40´s ???
Approaches for new
antibacterial agents
• Vaccines
• Anti-adhesion
• Inhibition of efflux pumps and bacterial enzymes
• New antibacterial targets
Approaches for new
antibacterial agents
• Vaccines
• Anti-adhesion
• Inhibition of efflux pumps and bacterial enzymes
• New antibacterial targets
It will take at least many years before there might be
antibacterials with new mechanisms of action available.
Our knowledge about and attitudes towards antibiotic
treatment must be radically improved/ changed
to ensure effective antibacterial treatment to patients
with severe bacterial diseases.
Bacteria :• Billions of years of evolutionary experience• Expert survivors• Rapid life-cycle• Intrinsic mechanisms of resistance
Homo sapiens :• Capacity for rapid behavioral change and
cultural evolution
Bacteria :• Billions of years of evolutionary experience• Expert survivors• Rapid life-cycle• Intrinsic mechanisms of resistance
Homo sapiens :• Capacity for rapid behavioral change and
cultural evolution
Academia
IndustryRegulatoryauthorities