problem statement concrete relaxation test-results

1
Effects of Superstructure Time-Dependent Deformations on Bridge Column Design Ebadollah Honarvar Gheitanbaf, Sri Sritharan, and Matt Rouse Civil, Construction & Environmental Engineering, Iowa State University 0.0 200.0 400.0 600.0 800.0 1000.0 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 Microstrain Time (day) Superstructure Strain Rate B6 B7 B5 B4 B2 B1 P i /A=6.68 P i /A=6.81 MPa P i /A=6.77 MPa P i /A=6.18 MPa P i /A=5.87 MPa P i /A=4.73 MPa -4000 -3000 -2000 -1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 F x (kN) Time (days) Base Shear B23 B24 B25 B26 0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.000 0.050 0.100 0.150 Midas Displacement (m) Estimated Displacement (m) 0.000 0.050 0.100 0.150 0.000 0.020 0.040 0.060 0.080 0.100 0.120 0.140 V/K eff (m) Estimated Displacement (m) Cracked Coulmns 0.000 0.010 0.020 0.030 0.040 0.000 0.020 0.040 0.060 0.080 V/K g (m) Estimated Displacement (m) Uncracked Columns Testing Testing Procedure Force control mode Displacement control mode Column Test Two specimen sizes to investigate any plausible size effect Two various loading scenarios: i. Instantaneous compressive axial displacement ii. Step Loading Beam Test Precracking loading Post-cracking loading: Failed the specimen to examine the possibility of any residual strains in the rebars -10000 0 10000 20000 30000 40000 -1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 Load (lb) Microstrain Time (min) Load/Tensile Strains L- L11H20 L- L9H20 Satec Load Problem Statement Analytical Investigation Results 1. Bridge superstructure shortens due to prestressing, and creep and shrinkage 2. Columns are pulled by the superstructure 3. Shear stresses are developed at the column base Methodology/Objective Concrete Relaxation Test Conclusions/Observations Concrete relaxation resulted in significant reduction in column base shear force Generally, the superstructure strain rate increased as the initial axial stress increased Top of column displacement was estimated fairly accurately using superstructure strain rate when it was compared to the analytical model results The maximum displacement and base shear force occurred for the most exterior columns, which cracked as well. The nearest columns to PNM experienced the minimum displacement and base shear The nearest columns to PNM experienced the minimum displacement and base shear force, thus remained uncraked. Concrete Relaxation Test-Results For the seven conduced test, strain remained constant, while force reduced over time 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 0 24 48 72 96 120 Stress (ksi) Time (hrs) Comparison of Compressive Stress Relaxation Small Column Specimen, loading age of 48 days Large Column Specimen, loading age of 67 days Small Column Specimen, loading age of 76 days Small Column Specimen Step Loading, loading age of 78 days Small Column Specimen Step Loading, loading age of 84 days Large RC Beam Precracking, loading age of 130 Large RC Beam Postcracking, loading age of 150 -550 -500 -450 -400 -350 -300 -250 -200 0 24 48 72 96 120 Microstrain Time (hr) Strains for Displacement-Control for 8 in. Diameter Column Location 1 Location 2 Location 3 Location 4 -0.02 0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0 20000 40000 60000 80000 100000 0 2 4 6 8 Time (Min) Actuator Displacement (in.) Force (lb) Loading under Force-Control Force Displacement 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 40000 50000 60000 70000 80000 90000 100000 0 50 100 150 Actuator Displacement (in.) Force (lb) Time (hr) Loading under Displacement-Control Force Displacement Analyzed six bridges with different lengths Two Short Bridge Frames; L f < 150 m (492 ft) Two Medium Bridge Frames 150 m (492 ft) < L f < 300 m (984 ft) Two Long Bridge Frames L f > 300 m (984 ft) Using the calculated strain rate, estimated the top of column displacement with respect to point of no movement (PNM) No residual strains in longitudinal rebars after the completion of the relaxation test Column relaxation led to appreciable reduction in column base shear Establish a realistic strain rate for the superstructure shortening Identify and quantify concrete relaxation phenomenon Analyze different bridge frame configurations using the Finite Element Analysis Propose a simplified design approach to calculate Propose a simplified design approach to calculate column moment/shear demands Strain Gages Strain Gages How to efficiently design bridge columns to accommodate stresses induced by superstructure time-dependent deformations in posttensioned concrete box-girder bridges

Upload: others

Post on 05-Nov-2021

7 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Problem Statement Concrete Relaxation Test-Results

Effects of Superstructure Time-Dependent Deformations on Bridge Column DesignEbadollah Honarvar Gheitanbaf, Sri Sritharan, and Matt Rouse

Civil, Construction & Environmental Engineering, Iowa State University

0.0

200.0

400.0

600.0

800.0

1000.0

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000

Mic

rost

rain

Time (day)

Superstructure Strain Rate

B6 B7 B5

B4 B2 B1

Pi/A=6.68 Pi/A=6.81

MPa

Pi/A=6.77

MPa

Pi/A=6.18

MPa

Pi/A=5.87

MPa

Pi/A=4.73

MPa

-4000

-3000

-2000

-1000

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500

Fx

(kN

) Time (days)

Base Shear

B23 B24 B25 B26

0

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.1

0.12

0.14

0.16

0.000 0.050 0.100 0.150

Mid

as

Dis

pla

cem

ent

(m)

Estimated Displacement (m)

0.000

0.050

0.100

0.150

0.000 0.020 0.040 0.060 0.080 0.100 0.120 0.140

V/K

eff(m

)

Estimated Displacement (m)

Cracked Coulmns

0.000

0.010

0.020

0.030

0.040

0.000 0.020 0.040 0.060 0.080

V/K

g(m

)

Estimated Displacement (m)

Uncracked Columns

Testing Testing Procedure

Force control mode

Displacement control mode

Column Test

Two specimen sizes to investigate any plausible size effect

Two various loading scenarios:

i. Instantaneous compressive axial displacement

ii. Step Loading

Beam Test

Precracking loading

Post-cracking loading:

Failed the specimen to examine the possibility of any residual strains in the

rebars

-10000

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

-1000

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

Load (

lb)

Mic

rost

rain

Time (min)

Load/Tensile Strains

L- L11H20L- L9H20Satec Load

Problem Statement

Analytical Investigation Results

1. Bridge superstructure shortens due to prestressing, and creep and shrinkage

2. Columns are pulled by the superstructure

3. Shear stresses are developed at the column base

Methodology/Objective

Concrete Relaxation Test

Conclusions/ObservationsConcrete relaxation resulted in significant reduction in column base shear force

Generally, the superstructure strain rate increased as the initial axial stress increased

Top of column displacement was estimated fairly accurately using superstructure strain rate when it was compared to the analytical model results

The maximum displacement and base shear force occurred for the most exterior columns, which cracked as well.

The nearest columns to PNM experienced the minimum displacement and base shear force, thus remained uncraked.The nearest columns to PNM experienced the minimum displacement and base shear force, thus remained uncraked.

Concrete Relaxation Test-ResultsFor the seven conduced test, strain remained constant, while force

reduced over time

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

0 24 48 72 96 120

Str

ess

(ksi

)

Time (hrs)

Comparison of Compressive Stress Relaxation

Small Column Specimen,

loading age of 48 days

Large Column Specimen,

loading age of 67 days

Small Column Specimen,

loading age of 76 days

Small Column Specimen

Step Loading, loading age of78 days

Small Column Specimen

Step Loading, loading age of84 days

Large RC Beam Precracking,

loading age of 130

Large RC Beam

Postcracking, loading age of150-550

-500

-450

-400

-350

-300

-250

-200

0 24 48 72 96 120

Mic

rost

rain

Time (hr)

Strains for Displacement-Control for 8 in.

Diameter Column

Location1Location

2Location3Location

4

-0.02

0

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.1

0

20000

40000

60000

80000

100000

0 2 4 6 8

Time (Min)

Act

uat

or

Dis

pla

cem

ent

(in

.)

Forc

e (l

b)

Loading under Force-Control

ForceDisplacement

0.06

0.07

0.08

0.09

40000

50000

60000

70000

80000

90000

100000

0 50 100 150

Act

uat

or

Dis

pla

cem

ent

(in.)

Forc

e (l

b)

Time (hr)

Loading under Displacement-Control

Force Displacement

Analyzed six bridges with

different lengths

Two Short Bridge Frames; Lf < 150 m (492 ft)

Two Medium Bridge Frames

150 m (492 ft) < Lf < 300 m (984 ft)

Two Long Bridge Frames Lf > 300 m (984 ft)

Using the calculated strain

rate, estimated the top of

column displacement with

respect to point of no

movement (PNM)

No residual strains in

longitudinal rebars after

the completion of the

relaxation test

Column relaxation led to

appreciable reduction in

column base shearEstablish a realistic strain rate for the superstructure

shortening

Identify and quantify concrete relaxation

phenomenon

Analyze different bridge frame configurations using the Finite Element Analysis

Propose a simplified design approach to calculate Propose a simplified design approach to calculate column moment/shear demands

Str

ain G

ages

Strain Gages

How to efficiently design bridge columns to accommodate stresses induced by superstructure time-dependent

deformations in posttensioned concrete box-girder bridges