problem conclusions hursat-adt and aircraft pressure · comparing ci-number/pressure relationships...

1
32 nd Conference on Hurricanes and Tropical Meteorology 18–22 April 2016, San Juan, PR [email protected] pdf of this poster Poster #80 Comparing CI-number/Pressure Relationships in the Western Pacific using HURSAT-ADT and Historical Reconnaissance Carl J. Schreck III 1,2 , K. R. Knapp 2 , J. P. Kossin 2 , and C. Velden 3 1 NCSU’s Cooperative Institute for Climate and Satellites North Carolina (CICS-NC), 2 NOAA’s National Centers for Environmental Information, 3 Wisconsin-Madison’s Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies (CIMSS) Conclusions Both Dvorak and Koba WPRs are inconsistent with Knaff–Zehr for stronger storms Koba’s pressures are good, but the winds are too weak when converted to pressure Dvorak’s pressures are too strong, but the winds converted to pressure are good This analysis supports operational practice of using Dvorak to estimate winds and then converting to pressure using Knaff–Zehr Map of fixes with both aircraft and HURSAT- ADT intensity estimates Data & Methods Reconnaissance data Obtained from JTWC F-Decks for 1978– 1987 Using pressure calculated from minimum flight-level height HURSAT-ADT ADT algorithm applied to HURSAT data (see Kossin et al. 2013) Only uses infrared data from geostationary satellites May underestimate intensities, esp. for storm with developing eyes or with very small eyes Match aircraft pressure with nearest HURSAT-ADT fix within 3 hours Koba et al. (1991) manually analyzed 855 fixes for 50 storms Our method produces 1972 fixes from 163 storms HURSAT-ADT and Aircraft Pressure Top: Histogram of HURSAT-ADT CI numbers and pressures derived from flight-level heights Bottom: Deviations from the median observed pressure for each table Broad agreement for storms weaker than T-5.0 and 960 hPa Tables diverge for stronger storms Aircraft pressures roughly align with those from Koba Dvorak pressures are too low for stronger storms Koba winds, when converted to pressure through Knaff–Zehr, are too weak for stronger storms Dvorak winds, converted to pressure through Knaff–Zehr, match observations Problem JTWC and JMA produce very different estimates of Typhoon strength Histogram of 1-min best track winds (left: JTWC, right: JMA) and aircraft reconnaissance pressures. JTWC uses the Dvorak tables JMA uses Koba tables, which have lower winds for the strongest storms Differences extend well beyond wind averaging periods (10- minute vs. 1-minute) Aircraft reconnaissance ended in 1987, and even then wind estimates were crude by today’s standards Wind–Pressure Relationships Knaff & Zehr (2007) and Knaff & Sampson (2006): V srm Storm-relative wind speed V srm =V max − 1.5 c 0.63 S Normalized size parameter 0.64 P env Environmental Pressure 1008.9 Φ Latitude 18.85° ∆P P env − MSLP c Storm motion 9.6 Glossary and References JTWC: Joint Typhoon Warning Center JMA: Japanese Meteorological Agency ADT: Advanced Dvorak Technique Dvorak, V. F., 1984: Tropical cyclone intensity analysis using satellite data. NOAA Tech. Rep. NESDIS 11, 45 pp. Knaff, J. A., and C. R. Sampson, 2006: Reanalysis of West Pacific tropical cyclone intensity 1966–1987. Preprints, 27th Conf. on Hurricanes and Tropical Meteorology, Monterey, CA, Amer. Meteor. Soc.. Knaff, J. A., and R. M. Zehr, 2007: Reexamination of Tropical Cyclone Wind–Pressure Relationships. Wea. Forecasting, 22, 71–88, doi:10.1175/WAF965.1. Koba, H., T. Hagiwara, S. Osano, and S. Akashi, 1991: Relationships between CI number and minimum sea level pressure/maximum wind speed of tropical cyclones. Geophys. Mag. , 44, 15–25. Kossin, J. P., T. L. Olander, and K. R. Knapp, 2013: Trend analysis with a new global record of tropical cyclone intensity. J. Climate, 26, 9960–9976, doi:10.1175/JCLI- D-13-00262.1.

Upload: others

Post on 14-Aug-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Problem Conclusions HURSAT-ADT and Aircraft Pressure · Comparing CI-number/Pressure Relationships in Poster #80 the Western Pacific using HURSAT -ADT and Historical Reconnaissance

32nd ConferenceonHurricanesandTropicalMeteorology18–22April2016,SanJuan,PR

[email protected] pdf ofthisposter

Poster#80ComparingCI-number/PressureRelationshipsintheWesternPacificusingHURSAT-ADTandHistoricalReconnaissance

CarlJ.Schreck III1,2,K.R.Knapp2,J.P.Kossin2,andC.Velden31NCSU’sCooperativeInstituteforClimateandSatellitesNorthCarolina(CICS-NC),2NOAA’sNationalCentersforEnvironmentalInformation,3Wisconsin-Madison’sCooperativeInstituteforMeteorologicalSatelliteStudies(CIMSS)

Conclusions

• BothDvorakandKoba WPRsareinconsistentwithKnaff–Zehr forstrongerstorms

• Koba’s pressuresaregood,butthewindsaretooweakwhenconvertedtopressure

• Dvorak’spressuresaretoostrong,butthewindsconvertedtopressurearegood

• ThisanalysissupportsoperationalpracticeofusingDvoraktoestimatewindsandthenconvertingtopressureusingKnaff–Zehr

MapoffixeswithbothaircraftandHURSAT-ADTintensityestimates

Data&Methods

Reconnaissancedata• ObtainedfromJTWC

F-Decksfor1978–1987

• Usingpressurecalculatedfromminimumflight-levelheight

HURSAT-ADT• ADTalgorithmappliedtoHURSATdata(seeKossin etal.

2013)• Onlyusesinfrareddatafromgeostationarysatellites• Mayunderestimateintensities,esp.forstormwith

developingeyesorwithverysmalleyes

MatchaircraftpressurewithnearestHURSAT-ADTfixwithin3hours• Koba etal.(1991)manuallyanalyzed855fixesfor50

storms• Ourmethodproduces1972fixesfrom163storms

HURSAT-ADTandAircraftPressure

Top:HistogramofHURSAT-ADTCInumbersandpressuresderivedfromflight-levelheightsBottom: Deviationsfromthemedianobservedpressureforeachtable

BroadagreementforstormsweakerthanT-5.0and960hPa

Tablesdivergeforstrongerstorms• AircraftpressuresroughlyalignwiththosefromKoba• Dvorakpressuresaretoolowforstrongerstorms• Koba winds,whenconvertedtopressurethroughKnaff–Zehr,aretoo

weakforstrongerstorms• Dvorakwinds,convertedtopressurethroughKnaff–Zehr,match

observations

Problem

JTWCandJMAproduceverydifferentestimatesofTyphoonstrength

Histogramof1-minbesttrackwinds(left:JTWC,right:JMA)andaircraftreconnaissancepressures.

• JTWCusestheDvoraktables• JMAusesKoba tables,whichhavelowerwindsforthe

strongeststorms• Differencesextendwellbeyondwindaveragingperiods(10-

minutevs.1-minute)• Aircraftreconnaissanceendedin1987,andeventhenwind

estimateswerecrudebytoday’sstandards

Wind–PressureRelationships

Knaff &Zehr (2007)andKnaff &Sampson(2006):

Vsrm Storm-relativewindspeed Vsrm = Vmax −1.5 c0.63

S Normalizedsize parameter 0.64Penv EnvironmentalPressure 1008.9Φ Latitude 18.85°∆P Penv − MSLPc Stormmotion 9.6

GlossaryandReferencesJTWC:JointTyphoonWarningCenter JMA:JapaneseMeteorologicalAgency ADT:AdvancedDvorakTechniqueDvorak,V.F.,1984:Tropical cycloneintensityanalysisusingsatellitedata.NOAATech.Rep.NESDIS11,45pp.Knaff, J.A.,andC.R.Sampson,2006:ReanalysisofWestPacifictropicalcycloneintensity1966–1987.Preprints,27thConf.onHurricanesandTropical

Meteorology,Monterey,CA,Amer.Meteor.Soc..Knaff, J.A.,andR.M.Zehr,2007:ReexaminationofTropicalCycloneWind–PressureRelationships.Wea.Forecasting,22,71–88,doi:10.1175/WAF965.1.Koba,H.,T.Hagiwara,S.Osano,andS.Akashi,1991:RelationshipsbetweenCInumber andminimum sealevelpressure/maximumwindspeedoftropical

cyclones.Geophys.Mag.,44,15–25.Kossin, J.P.,T.L.Olander,andK.R.Knapp,2013:Trendanalysiswithanewglobal recordoftropicalcycloneintensity.J.Climate,26,9960–9976,doi:10.1175/JCLI-

D-13-00262.1.