private knowledge vs. common knowledge carlson and van dam (see econometrica, 1991) and morris and...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Private Knowledge vs. Common Knowledge Carlson and Van Dam (see Econometrica, 1991) and Morris and Shin (see AER, 1998)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022072013/56649e495503460f94b3cced/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Private Knowledge vs. Common Knowledge
Carlson and Van Dam (see Econometrica, 1991) and Morris and
Shin (see AER, 1998)
![Page 2: Private Knowledge vs. Common Knowledge Carlson and Van Dam (see Econometrica, 1991) and Morris and Shin (see AER, 1998)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022072013/56649e495503460f94b3cced/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Coordination Game
4,40,2
2,03,3
A B
A
B
Two Equilibria: (4,4) and (3,3)
![Page 3: Private Knowledge vs. Common Knowledge Carlson and Van Dam (see Econometrica, 1991) and Morris and Shin (see AER, 1998)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022072013/56649e495503460f94b3cced/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Carlson-Van Dam’s “Global Game”
4+X, 4+X0+X, 2
2 ,0+X3 ,3
A B
A
B
Add X to Action A And view X as a variable
![Page 4: Private Knowledge vs. Common Knowledge Carlson and Van Dam (see Econometrica, 1991) and Morris and Shin (see AER, 1998)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022072013/56649e495503460f94b3cced/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
X
-2 3
BB dominates
AAdominates
Both, AA and BBare Equilibria
Global Game:
![Page 5: Private Knowledge vs. Common Knowledge Carlson and Van Dam (see Econometrica, 1991) and Morris and Shin (see AER, 1998)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022072013/56649e495503460f94b3cced/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
“Connecting” games together
Private Signal
X
Uniform
XX
i
ii
],[~
Random variable
![Page 6: Private Knowledge vs. Common Knowledge Carlson and Van Dam (see Econometrica, 1991) and Morris and Shin (see AER, 1998)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022072013/56649e495503460f94b3cced/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
-2 3
B dominates A
dominates
Both AA and BBare an Equilibrium
iX
If my signal is –2I suspect that the
other player signalis –2 with 50% probability :
thus action B dominates
If my signal is 3I suspect that theother player signal
is 3 with 50% probability :thus action A dominates
![Page 7: Private Knowledge vs. Common Knowledge Carlson and Van Dam (see Econometrica, 1991) and Morris and Shin (see AER, 1998)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022072013/56649e495503460f94b3cced/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
-2 3
B dominates
Adominates
iX
X*=1/2
32
1)2(
2
1*)0(
2
1*)4(
2
1 XX X*=1/2
Cutoff X is determinedso that player is
indifferent between playing A or playing B:
A-RDB-RD
A-PD
At X=0, (the original game), BB or AA with 50-50=risk dominance
PD=Pereto dominanceRD=Risk dominance
![Page 8: Private Knowledge vs. Common Knowledge Carlson and Van Dam (see Econometrica, 1991) and Morris and Shin (see AER, 1998)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022072013/56649e495503460f94b3cced/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Morris and Shin
)(*
)(
]1,0[~
fe
f
U
Randomfundamental
FloatingExchange rate
Pegged exchangerate
Speculators’ cost of attack: t>0
Speculator’s gain if peg abandoned: )(* fe
![Page 9: Private Knowledge vs. Common Knowledge Carlson and Van Dam (see Econometrica, 1991) and Morris and Shin (see AER, 1998)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022072013/56649e495503460f94b3cced/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Speculators’ cost of attack: t>0
Speculator’s gain if peg abandoned: )(* fe
Government value of defending peg:
)(
)(),(
),(
),(
0
C
CGov’t cost of defending:
Gov’t observes:
Government indifference:
Government defends if:
-fraction of attackers in the population
C() increases in alphadecreases in theta
![Page 10: Private Knowledge vs. Common Knowledge Carlson and Van Dam (see Econometrica, 1991) and Morris and Shin (see AER, 1998)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022072013/56649e495503460f94b3cced/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Dominance region for attack speculators
),0(C )abandons peg below even if no one
Attacks (.
Attack strategy dominates
![Page 11: Private Knowledge vs. Common Knowledge Carlson and Van Dam (see Econometrica, 1991) and Morris and Shin (see AER, 1998)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022072013/56649e495503460f94b3cced/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
tfe )(* )no attack above even if government
abandons peg (.
Attack strategy dominates
No-attack strategy
dominates
PotentialMultiple
Equilibria
![Page 12: Private Knowledge vs. Common Knowledge Carlson and Van Dam (see Econometrica, 1991) and Morris and Shin (see AER, 1998)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022072013/56649e495503460f94b3cced/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Signals
Sequence of steps:1 .Realized;
2 .Speculators observe--
],[~
Ui
ii
small
3 .Government observes and decides on peg--
Abandons if
),(
)(
![Page 13: Private Knowledge vs. Common Knowledge Carlson and Van Dam (see Econometrica, 1991) and Morris and Shin (see AER, 1998)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022072013/56649e495503460f94b3cced/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
]1,0[~U
*i
Attack strategy dominates
No-attack strategy
dominates
PotentialMultiple
equilibria
![Page 14: Private Knowledge vs. Common Knowledge Carlson and Van Dam (see Econometrica, 1991) and Morris and Shin (see AER, 1998)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022072013/56649e495503460f94b3cced/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Probability that government abandons the peg
)(1)(1 *i
An indifference at * :
t=prob.gain= )(*)(1 ** fe