primer on monitoring and evaluation

16
Primer on Monitoring and Evaluation

Upload: amanda-chen

Post on 02-Jan-2016

38 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Primer on Monitoring and Evaluation. The 3 Pillars of Monitoring and Evaluation Identifying the Performance Indicators Collecting information using appropriate M&E tools and methods Household surveys Facility Surveys HMIS Quantifiable Supervisory Checklists - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Primer on  Monitoring and Evaluation

Primer on Monitoring and

Evaluation

Page 2: Primer on  Monitoring and Evaluation

The 3 Pillars of Monitoring and Evaluation

Identifying the Performance IndicatorsCollecting information using appropriate M&E tools and methods

Household surveysFacility SurveysHMISQuantifiable Supervisory Checklists

Using M & E results for program decisions

Page 3: Primer on  Monitoring and Evaluation

Coverage for Routine Immunization

Very Low Initial Reach : <20%

Page 4: Primer on  Monitoring and Evaluation

Coverage for Routine ImmunizationFailure to sustain coverage after

initial reach

Page 5: Primer on  Monitoring and Evaluation

Coverage for Maternal Health Very Low Initial Reach : <35%

for AN care

Page 6: Primer on  Monitoring and Evaluation

Inequities in Under-five Mortality Rates

DHS 2003

Page 7: Primer on  Monitoring and Evaluation

Under-five Mortality – Absolute Difference between low and highNigeria has highest difference in the Region

Page 8: Primer on  Monitoring and Evaluation

• All performance indicators should have Base-line and Targets – NHSDP has them

• Should provide data at the required frequency and with adequate disaggregation

• Should be able to identify sub groups that are missing out services (Equity)

Principles of M &E

Page 9: Primer on  Monitoring and Evaluation

•Should use 3rd party assessments for Evaluations

1.Independence2.Less distraction for the program

manager

•Clearly defined responsibilities for analysis and use of data• Availability of dedicated staff and • Systems/protocols for reviewing and

using data

•Robust enough to meet the data requirements of RBF /CCT/Contracting which require more precision in measuring results

Principles of M &E

Page 10: Primer on  Monitoring and Evaluation

Where does Nigeria Stand now?

Page 11: Primer on  Monitoring and Evaluation

Reduction in Under

5mortality Rates;

Maternal Mortality

Ratios and HIV

prevalence among 15-

24 Year population

Level IHealth Impact

Level 2Program

Outcomes

Level 3Service Delivery outputs

Level 4 Institutional Processes

Level 5Inputs

1. Wards meeting the Staffing requirements to deliver minimum package of services (%)

2. Health Personnel receiving competency based training (Number)

3. Health Facilities Renovated/ Rehabilitated (Number)

4. Health Centers receiving supplies of Essential Medicines for ward Minimum Health Package (%)

1. Increase in Federal and State Budgets allocated for health sector (%)

2. Improved retention of Human Resources for Health (%)

3. Public health facilities having active committees (at least 4 meetings per year) that include community representatives (%)

4. Increase in State HMIS reports meeting minimum quality standards (Number

1. Increase in Children 12-23 months fully immunized (%)

2. Increase in women receiving IPT for malaria during pregnancy (%)

3. Increase in births attended by Skilled providers (%)

4. Improved TB case detection rates (%)

5.Reduction in unmet need for FP services (%)

1. Increase in children under five sleeping under an ITN during the previous night (%)

2.Enhanced condom use at last high risk sex (%)

3. Improved TB Cure rates (%)

4. Increase in contraceptive prevalence rates (%)

The NSHDP Results Framework in Place

Page 12: Primer on  Monitoring and Evaluation

Collecting data on NSHDP performance indicators using appropriate M&E tools and methods

Household surveys:

DHS being done once in 5 years – Possibility of Mini DHS in between DHS rounds?MICs proposed once every 3 yearsLQAS being used for Malaria + Program – Scope for using in other programs, but requires capacity building at sub national levelUrgent need for more frequent surveys providing disaggregated data for States/LGAs

Page 13: Primer on  Monitoring and Evaluation

Collecting data on NHSDP performance indicators using appropriate M&E tools and methods

Facility Surveys: Being done under the Malaria Program Need to develop design, pilot and

implement

Quantifiable Supervision Checklists: Not being done Will be required with improved results

focus Need to design, pilot and implement

HMIS: In place Quality, coverage and timely reporting

remain a concern Requires systems for validation of data

Page 14: Primer on  Monitoring and Evaluation

Using M&E results for program decisions

Lot more work still needs to be done

Developing simple tools for annual State/LGA performance ranking

Capacity building at District and LGA levels on decentralized data analysis

Ensuring robust M&E for RBF/Performance Contracting initiatives

Page 15: Primer on  Monitoring and Evaluation

Proposed Organization of Session:

Day 3Quiz : What we know about M&E A brief primer on Monitoring and EvaluationPresentations on different M&E tools and approaches

Day 4 Introduction to New M&E tools : LQASCase StudyDiscussion on next Steps on Development of State Results chains and specific actions for putting in place M&E systems for disaggregated data generation and use

Page 16: Primer on  Monitoring and Evaluation

Distribution of States by Scores Achieved using Self Administered Questionnaire