pricewaterhousecoopers llp february 2010 chamber of russian tax advisers 10 th anniversary...
TRANSCRIPT
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPFebruary 2010
Chamber of Russian Tax Advisers 10th Anniversary Conference
How to use the Commission to win your case
2 February 2012
Stephen ColecloughPresident CFE
Slide 1
Slide 2
Agenda
Role of the Commission• The Commission’s agenda for the next 2 years
− EU financial crisis – Financial Transactions Tax (FTT)− Energy Taxation (CO2 reduction)− VAT White Paper / VAT fraud − Financial services− Lisbon Agenda
• Working with the Commission
First International Indirect Tax Conference – February 2012
Slide 3
Working with the Commission
• Background
• Issues
• What you can do
First International Indirect Tax Conference – February 2012
Background
Pre 1996:
- VAT single harmonised tax uniformly applied in every member state
SLIM report
- 125 areas of discretion - Mistranslations e.g. Art 13.A.1.f and factoring in English,
consultant in Art 9.2.e in Spanish - Interpretations- Local law (e.g. factoring)- Local administrative practice
Slide 4
First International Indirect Tax Conference – February 2012
Common problems
• Two member states claim VAT on the same transaction (place of supply)
• Failure to refund VAT to ‘foreigners’
• Failure to refund VAT in a timely fashion
• Disproportionate administrative, security or penalty obligations
• Non-compliance by member state
Slide 6
First International Indirect Tax Conference – February 2012
Usual response to common problems
• Appeal to local court and possibly seek referrals (some countries have notably few referrals)
• Do not do the business!
• Do something else
Slide 7
First International Indirect Tax Conference – February 2012
A European approach
• Commission very keen to hear of cases
• Soft law – Commission statements (a veiled threat to non-compliant states)
• Infraction powers
• Peer pressure – the role of studies, academics and reports
• VAT Committee ‘orientations’
Slide 8
First International Indirect Tax Conference – February 2012
Complaints
Making a complaint
- Obliged to investigate- Anonymous or named- Facts- Face to face- Pilot procedure
Complaints
- Low cost but not fast- Run in conjunction with local processes - Usually good results
Slide 9
First International Indirect Tax Conference – February 2012
Complaints process
• Commission writes to Ministry of Finance
• Ministry invites to relevant head of VAT department
• Head of VAT telephones district/area controller
• Area controller shouts at your inspector!
• Ministry to reply in 6 months with an explanation
- disagree, i.e. not what we do- misunderstanding - agree they do that but justify
• Commission considers response and if it believes there is a case to ask for a reasoned opinion from Member State (e.g. VAT grouping)
• Ultimately off the ECJ
Slide 10
First International Indirect Tax Conference – February 2012
Results from these approaches
• High degree of success in a non adversarial manner
• Build strong relationships with the Commission
• Positive effect on other points of your business
Slide 11
First International Indirect Tax Conference – February 2012