prevalence of mitral valve prolapse in stickler syndrome

4
American Journal of Medical Genetics 116A:234–237 (2003) Prevalence of Mitral Valve Prolapse in Stickler Syndrome Nadeem Ahmad, 1 Allan J. Richards, 2 Helen C. Murfett, 3 Leonard Shapiro, 3 John D. Scott, 1 John R.W. Yates, 4 Joanne Norton, 3 and Martin P. Snead 1 * 1 Department of Ophthalmology, Vitreoretinal Service, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK 2 Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK 3 Department of Cardiology, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK 4 Department of Medical Genetics, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK The prevalence of mitral valve prolapse in Stickler syndrome has been reported to be much higher than in the general population. As a result, it has been recommended that all patients with Stickler syndrome undergo routine echocardiography and have antibio- tic prophylaxis prior to surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of mitral valve prolapse in a large cohort of UK patients with Stickler syndrome in whom the clinical diagnosis has been confirmed by molecular genetic analysis. Probands and pedigrees were identified from the Vitreor- etinal Service database according to pre- viously published criteria. Ophthalmic, skeletal, audiometric, and orofacial features were assessed. Affected individuals under- went a full cardiological examination in- cluding auscultation and two-dimensional echocardiography. Mutation analysis of the COL2A1 and COL11A1 genes was carried out. Seventy-eight patients from 25 pedigrees were studied. Mutation analysis confirmed the clinical diagnosis in every pedigree. No patient was found to have clinical evidence of cardiovascular disease and no patient had significant mitral or other valvular prolapse on echocardiography. These data from a large cohort of UK patients with proven Stickler syndrome do not suggest an increas- ed incidence of mitral valve prolapse over and above that found in the general popula- tion. Routine echocardiography screening and use of preoperative antibiotics are unnecessary and should be reserved for those individual cases where there is clear clinical indication. ß 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc. KEY WORDS: COL2A1; mitral valve pro- lapse; echocardiography; Stickler syndrome; vitreous INTRODUCTION Stickler syndrome [Hereditary Arthro-ophthalmopa- thy, MIM 108300 and 184840] is a dominantly inherited disorder of collagen connective tissue, resulting in abnormalities of vitreous, myopia, retinal detachment, midfacial hypoplasia, midline clefting, deafness, and arthropathy [Stickler et al., 1965; Stickler and Pugh, 1967]. Mutations have been identified in COL2A1 and COL11A1, the genes for types II and XI collagen [Ahmad et al., 1991; Richards et al., 1996]. Systemic features are highly variable [Snead and Yates, 1999; Richards et al., 2000a,b; Snead et al., 2000]. Stickler syndrome is the commonest inherited cause of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in childhood, with a high risk of giant retinal tear, which can be bilateral. As a result, patients frequently present to the vitreoretinal surgeon either for prophylactic cryother- apy or with complex retinal detachment requiring urgent surgery under general anesthesia. In addition, patients commonly undergo elective surgical procedures requiring general anesthesia to treat a variety of orthopedic, oro-facial and middle ear disorders. The prevalence of mitral valve prolapse in Stickler syndrome has been reported to be much higher than in the general population [Liberfarb and Goldblatt, 1986]. This has been attributed to the generalized abnormality affecting the connective tissues, comparable to other disorders such as Marfan syndrome, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, and pseudoxanthoma elasticum [Leier et al., 1980; Pini et al., 1989]. It has therefore been recom- mended that all patients with Stickler syndrome under- Grant sponsor: Guide Dogs for the Blind Association; Grant sponsor: Stanley Thomas Johnson Foundation; Grant sponsor: Isaac Newton Trust; Grant sponsor: University of Cambridge Retinal Research Fund. *Correspondence to: Martin P. Snead, Vitreoretinal Service, Box 41, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK. E-mail: [email protected] Received 9 November 2001; Accepted 17 April 2002 DOI 10.1002/ajmg.a.10619 ß 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Upload: nadeem-ahmad

Post on 06-Jun-2016

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Prevalence of mitral valve prolapse in Stickler syndrome

American Journal of Medical Genetics 116A:234–237 (2003)

Prevalence of Mitral Valve Prolapsein Stickler Syndrome

Nadeem Ahmad,1 Allan J. Richards,2 Helen C. Murfett,3 Leonard Shapiro,3 John D. Scott,1

John R.W. Yates,4 Joanne Norton,3 and Martin P. Snead1*1Department of Ophthalmology, Vitreoretinal Service, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK2Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK3Department of Cardiology, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK4Department of Medical Genetics, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK

The prevalence of mitral valve prolapse inStickler syndrome has been reported to bemuch higher than in the general population.As a result, it has been recommended that allpatients with Stickler syndrome undergoroutine echocardiography and have antibio-tic prophylaxis prior to surgery. The purposeof this study was to evaluate the prevalenceof mitral valve prolapse in a large cohort ofUK patients with Stickler syndrome in whomthe clinical diagnosis has been confirmed bymolecular genetic analysis. Probands andpedigrees were identified from the Vitreor-etinal Service database according to pre-viously published criteria. Ophthalmic,skeletal, audiometric, and orofacial featureswere assessed. Affected individuals under-went a full cardiological examination in-cluding auscultation and two-dimensionalechocardiography. Mutation analysis of theCOL2A1andCOL11A1genes was carried out.Seventy-eight patients from 25 pedigreeswere studied. Mutation analysis confirmedthe clinical diagnosis in every pedigree. Nopatient was found to have clinical evidenceof cardiovascular disease and no patient hadsignificant mitral or other valvular prolapseon echocardiography. These data from alarge cohort of UK patients with provenStickler syndrome do not suggest an increas-ed incidence of mitral valve prolapse over

and above that found in the general popula-tion. Routine echocardiography screeningand use of preoperative antibiotics areunnecessary and should be reserved forthose individual cases where there is clearclinical indication. � 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

KEY WORDS: COL2A1; mitral valve pro-lapse; echocardiography;Stickler syndrome; vitreous

INTRODUCTION

Stickler syndrome [Hereditary Arthro-ophthalmopa-thy, MIM 108300 and 184840] is a dominantly inheriteddisorder of collagen connective tissue, resulting inabnormalities of vitreous, myopia, retinal detachment,midfacial hypoplasia, midline clefting, deafness, andarthropathy [Stickler et al., 1965; Stickler and Pugh,1967]. Mutations have been identified in COL2A1 andCOL11A1, the genes for types II andXI collagen [Ahmadet al., 1991; Richards et al., 1996]. Systemic features arehighly variable [Snead and Yates, 1999; Richards et al.,2000a,b; Snead et al., 2000].

Stickler syndrome is the commonest inherited causeof rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in childhood,with a high risk of giant retinal tear, which can bebilateral. As a result, patients frequently present to thevitreoretinal surgeon either for prophylactic cryother-apy or with complex retinal detachment requiringurgent surgery under general anesthesia. In addition,patients commonlyundergo elective surgical proceduresrequiring general anesthesia to treat a variety oforthopedic, oro-facial and middle ear disorders.

The prevalence of mitral valve prolapse in Sticklersyndrome has been reported to be much higher than inthe general population [Liberfarb and Goldblatt, 1986].This has been attributed to the generalized abnormalityaffecting the connective tissues, comparable to otherdisorders such as Marfan syndrome, Ehlers-Danlossyndrome, and pseudoxanthoma elasticum [Leier et al.,1980; Pini et al., 1989]. It has therefore been recom-mended that all patients with Stickler syndrome under-

Grant sponsor: Guide Dogs for the Blind Association; Grantsponsor: Stanley Thomas Johnson Foundation; Grant sponsor:Isaac Newton Trust; Grant sponsor: University of CambridgeRetinal Research Fund.

*Correspondence to: Martin P. Snead, Vitreoretinal Service,Box 41, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2QQ,UK. E-mail: [email protected]

Received 9 November 2001; Accepted 17 April 2002

DOI 10.1002/ajmg.a.10619

� 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Page 2: Prevalence of mitral valve prolapse in Stickler syndrome

go routine cardiac evaluation including echocardiogra-phy [Liberfarb and Goldblatt, 1986], and that in thesepatients, antibiotic prophylaxis prior to surgery shouldbe considered [Liberfarb and Goldblatt, 1986; Temple,1989]. Since these early reports, the clinical andmolecular genetic heterogeneity of Stickler syndromehas been more clearly defined [Snead et al., 1994;Ballo et al., 1998; Annunen et al., 1999; Martinet al., 1999; Snead and Yates, 1999; Richards et al.,2000a,b]. In the light of this data, the purpose of thisstudy was to examine the prevalence of mitral valveprolapse in a large cohort of patients satisfying un-equivocal clinical and genetic diagnostic criteria forStickler syndrome.

METHODS

Probands and pedigrees were identified from the Vit-reoretinal Service database at Addenbrooke’s Hospital.Ophthalmic, skeletal, audiometric, and orofacial fea-tures were assessed using the methods previouslyreported [Richards et al., 2000a]. Informed writtenconsent was obtained from all patients and prior ethicalapproval for the study was received (LREC92/019).

A direct inquiry was made regarding the cardiovas-cular status of all patients. Seventy-four patients wereable to appear for cardiology assessment, and allunderwent a full cardiological examination includingauscultation and two-dimensional echocardiography.Echocardiographic studies were carried out at the de-partment of Cardiology Addenbrooke’s NHS Trust

Cambridge, using a Hewlett-Packard Sonos 2500(63 scans) and Sonos 4500 (15 scans) with 3.5–2.5 MHzphased-array transducers. Echocardiographic viewsconsisted of long and short axis, apical four and apicaltwo chambers, incorporating conventional pulsed andcolor flow Doppler. Mitral valve prolapse was definedaccording to the established criteria of systolic displace-ment of themitral leaflets bymore than twomm into theleft atrium superior to themitral annular plane (the lineconnecting the annular hinge points of the leaflets).

Molecular Genetic Analysis

Mutation analysis of cDNA for a1(XI) collagen wasperformedasdescribedpreviously [Richards et al., 1996;Martin et al., 1999]. Mutations in COL2A1 were de-tected by amplification and exon sequencing as alsopreviously described [Richards et al., 2000a]. Mutationswere confirmed by analyzing DNA from all family mem-bers, either by restriction enzymes digestion, or singledideoxynucleotide sequencing reactions [Richards et al.,1996, Richards et al., 2000a,b].

RESULTS

One hundred and fifteen affected patients wereidentified from25pedigrees.Mutation analysis confirm-ed the clinical diagnosis. The pedigrees and mutationanalysis are summarized in Table I. A mixture of mis-sense, premature termination codons, frame shift, andsplicing mutations were found. Some of these have been

TABLE I. Summary of Results

Family no. Gene Mutation ReferenceNumberaffected

Echocardio-gram performed

MS1 COL11A1 G97V Richards et al. [1996] 7 4MS2 COL2A1 PTC R585X Richards et al. [2000a] 3 3MS4 COL2A1 Missplice IVS51 Gþ 1T — 4 4MS5 COL2A1 PTC Q1037X — 3 5MS6 COL2A1 Missplice IVS51 Tþ 2C — 5 1MS8 COL2A1 22621 1 bp ins (C) Exon 36 Richards et al. [2000a] 1 1MS11 COL2A1 4267 4 bp ins (GGAT) Exon 2 Richards et al. [2000a] 8 4MS12 COL2A1 R365C Richards et al. [2000b] 1 1MS15 COL2A1 Missplice IVS 27 Gþ1A — 5 4MS17 COL2A1 27870 1 bp ins (G) Exon 49 Richards et al. [2000a] 5 4MS19 COL2A1 Missplice IVS 23 Gþ135A — 10 9MS20 COL2A1 PTC R732X Richards et al. [2000a] 6 3MS22 COL2A1 Missplice IVS 40 Gþ5C — 2 2MS23 COL2A1 Missplice IVS 50 Tþ2G — 9 2MS24 COL2A1 27852 1 bp del (A)/8 bp ins (TCCTGCTG) Exon 49 — 1 1MS25 COL2A1 L467F Richards et al. [2000b] 9 5MS31 COL2A1 PTC R453X — 3 2MS39 COL2A1 26312 (G) bp del Exon 44 — 3 2MS40 COL11A1 Multi Exon Deletion (31–42) Martin et al. [1999] 10 7MS42 COL11A1 Missplice IVS 14 A�2 del Martin et al. [1999] 5 1MS51 COL2A1 Missplice IVS 29 Gþ1A — 4 4MS54 COL2A1 17189 1 bp del (T) Exon 21 — 2 2MS55 COL2A1 PTC 687X — 2 2MS66 COL2A1 25673 1 bp ins (C) Exon 42 Richards et al. [2000a] 3 3MS96 COL2A1 26313 1 bp ins (A) Exon 37 — 4 2Total 115 78

Position of insertions (ins) or deletions (del) in COL2A1 are located by the nucleotide number in the complete gene sequence (accession No. L10347).Premature termination codons (PTC) are indicated by the altered amino acid in the procollagenmolecule, where the first glycine of the triple helical region isnumbered as 1. Amino acid substitutions are likewise indicated. For COL2A1 the exons are numbered 1–54.

Mitral Valve Prolapse in Stickler Syndrome 235

Page 3: Prevalence of mitral valve prolapse in Stickler syndrome

reported previously (as indicated). Clinical examinationrevealed no evidence of cardiovascular disease. None ofthe 78 patients assessed by echocardiography hadsignificant mitral or other valvular abnormality.

DISCUSSION

Although most patients with mitral valve prolapsehave a benign clinical course [Panidis et al., 1986;Devereux, 1995], the presence of a valvular defect, espe-cially when associated with regurgitation, puts thepatient at higher risk of various peri- and postope-rative complications, including bacterial endocarditis[MacMahon et al., 1987; Devereux, 1995]. Any patientwith a suspicion of such a valve abnormality needsprophylactic antibiotics when undergoing any surgicalprocedure.

Mitral valve prolapse is a condition that can havepotentially serious complications including stroke,heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and severe mitralregurgitation [Devereux, 1995]. The frequency of diag-nosis of mitral valve prolapse (MVP) depends upon thediagnostic criteria used. Initial echocardiographic defi-nitions suggested a high prevalence in otherwisenormal individuals [Sasaki et al., 1982; Wann et al.,1983; Warth et al., 1985; Morganroth et al., 1980]. Morerecently, revised echocardiographic diagnostic criteriahave returned MVP to a relatively infrequent condition[Levine et al., 1988]. It has also been recommended thatpatients previously diagnosed with mitral valve pro-lapse should have repeat echocardiography to confirmthis diagnosis [Panidis, 1996].

Initial studies suggested a high prevalence of MVP inpatients with Stickler syndrome [Liberfarb and Gold-blatt, 1986] but this might reflect a higher rate of falsepositives resulting from diagnostic criteria which havesince been revised [Levine et al., 1988]. In addition, it ispossible that earlier studies could have included a moreheterogenous group of connective tissue disorderswhereMVP can occur, sincemolecular genetic diagnosisfor Stickler syndromewas not possible at that time. Ourresults from a large cohort of UK patients with provenStickler syndrome do not confirm this finding, suggest-ing that the prevalence of mitral valve prolapse inpatients with Stickler syndrome is similar to that in thenormal population. Routine echocardiography screen-ing and use of preoperative antibiotics are thereforeunnecessary and should be reserved for those individualcases where there is clear clinical indication. This willnot only reduce the cost of treatment and the workloadon the cardiology services, butwill also ensure that thereis no unnecessary delay in the urgent surgery that thesepatients sometimes require for retinal reattachment. Itis also reassuring for the patients with Sticklersyndrome that their risk of valvular heart disease issimilar to the general population.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We gratefully acknowledge the help of The SticklerSyndrome Support Group and Mrs. Gillian Whitmoreand Mrs. Dawn Kelly, Vitreoretinal Service co-coordi-nators, Addenbrooke’s Hospital.

REFERENCES

Ahmad NN, Ala-Kokko L, Knowlton RG, Jimenez SA, Weaver EJ, MaguireJI, Tasman W, Prockop DJ. 1991. Stop codon in the procollagen II gene(COL2A1) in a family with the Stickler syndrome (arthro-ophthalmo-pathy). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:6624–6627.

Annunen S, Korkko J, CzarnyM,WarmanML, BrunnerHG, KaariainenH,Mullikan JB, Tranebjarg L, Brooks DG, Cox GF, Cruysberg JR, CurtisMA, Davenport SL, Friedrich CA, Kaitila I, Krawczynski MR, Latos-Bielenska A, Mukai S, Olsen BR, Shinno N, Somer M, Vikkula M,Zlotogora J, ProckopDJ, Ala-Kokko L. 1999. Splicingmutations of 54-bpexons in the COL11A1 gene cause Marshall syndrome, but othermutations cause overlapping Marshall/Stickler phenotypes. Am J HumGenet 65:974–983.

Ballo R, Beighton PH, Ramesar RS. 1998. Stickler-like syndrome due to adominant negative mutation in the COL2A1 gene. Am J Med Genet80:6–11.

Devereux RB. 1995. Recent developments in the diagnosis and manage-ment of mitral valve prolapse. Current Opinion in Cardiology 10:107–116.

Leier CV, Call TD, Fulkerson PK, Wooley CF. 1980. The spectrum ofcardiac defects in Ehler Danlos syndrome. Ann Intern Med 105:384–386.

Levine RA, Stathogiannis E, Newell JB, Harrigan P, Weyman AE. 1988.Reconsideration of echocardiographic standards for mitral valveprolapse: lack of association between leaflet displacement isolated tothe apical four chamber view and independent echocardiographicevidence of abnormality. J Am Coll Cardiol 11:1010–1019.

Liberfarb RM, Goldblatt A. 1986. Prevalence of mitral-valve prolapse in theStickler syndrome. Am J Med Genet 24:387–392.

MacMahon SW, Roberts JK, Kramer Fox R, Zuckar DM, Roberts RB,Devereux RB. 1987. Mitral valve prolapse and infective endocardios.American Heart Journal 113:1291–1298.

Martin S, Richards AJ, Yates JRW, Scott JD, Pope FM, Snead MP.1999. Stickler syndrome: further mutations in COL11A1 andevidence for additional locus heterogeneity. Eur J Hum Genet 7:807–814.

Morganroth J, Jones RH, Chen CC, Naito M. 1980. Two dimensionalechocardiography in mitral aortic and tricuspid valve prolapse: theclinical problem, cardiac nuclear imaging considerations and a proposedstandard for diagnosis. Am J Cardiol 46:1164–1177.

Panidis JP. 1996. Cardiac ultrasound. Boston, MA: Blackwell Science.p 180–181.

Panidis IP, Mc Allister M, Ross J, Mintz GS. 1986. Prevalence of mitralregurgitation in mitral valve prolapse syndrome: a Doppler echocardio-graphic study of 80 patients. J Am Coll Cardiology 7:975–981.

Pini R, Roman MJ, Kramer-Fox R, Devereux RB. 1989. Mitral valvedimensions and motion in Marfans patients with and without mitralvalve prolapse. Circulation 80:915–924.

Richards AJ, Yates JRW, Williams R, Payne SJ, Pope FM, Scott JD, SneadMP. 1996. A family with Stickler syndrome type 2 has a mutation in theCOL11A1 gene resulting in the substitution of glycine 97 by valine ina1(XI) collagen. Hum Mol Genet 5:1339–1343.

Richards AJ, Martin S, Yates JRW, Baguley DM, Pope FM, Scott JD, SneadMP. 2000a. COL2A1 exon 2 mutations: relevance to the Stickler andWagner syndromes. Br J Ophthalmol 84:364–371.

Richards AJ, Martin S, Yates JRW, Baguley DM, Pope FM, Scott JD, SneadMP. 2000b. Variations in the vitreous phenotype of Stickler syndromecan be caused by different amino acid substitutions in the X position ofthe type II collagen Gly-X-Y triple helix. Am J Hum Genet 67:1083–1094.

Sasaki H, Ogawa S, Handa S, Nakamura Y, Yamade R. 1982. Twodimensional echocardiographic diagnosis of mitral valve prolapsesyndrome in presumably healthy young students. J Cardiography12:23–31.

Snead MP, Yates JRW. 1999. Clinical and molecular genetics of Sticklersyndrome. J Med Genet 36:353–359.

Snead MP, Payne SJ, Barton DE, Yates JRW, Al-Imara L, Pope FM, ScottJD. 1994. Stickler syndrome: correlation between vitreo-retinal pheno-types and linkage to COL 2A1. Eye 8:609–614.

SneadMP, Yates JRW, Scott JD, BaguleyDM, Pope FM,Martin S, RichardsAJ. 2000. Clinical phenotypes of families with Stickler syndrome andmutations in either COL2A1or COL11A1. Proc Greenwood GenetCenter 19:169.

236 Ahmad et al.

Page 4: Prevalence of mitral valve prolapse in Stickler syndrome

Stickler GB, Pugh DG. 1967. Hereditary progressive arthro-ophthalmo-pathy II. Additional observations on vertebral abnormalities, a hearingdefect, and a report of a similar case. Mayo Clin Proc 42:495–500.

Stickler GB, Belau PG, Farrell FJ. 1965. Hereditary progressive arthro-ophthalmopathy. Mayo Clin Proc 40:433–455.

Temple IK. 1989. Stickler syndrome. J Med Genet 26:119–126.

Wann LS, Grove JR, Hess TR, Glisch L, Ptacin MJ, Hughes CV, Gross CM.1983. Prevalence of mitral valve prolapse by two dimensionalechocardiography is healthy young women. Br Heart J 49(4):334–340.

WarthDC,KingME,CohenJM,TesorieroVL,MarcusE,WeymanAE.1985.Prevalence of mitral valve prolapse in normal children. J Am CollCardiol 5:1173–1177.

Mitral Valve Prolapse in Stickler Syndrome 237