presented by patti harper-slaboszewicz utilipoint international, inc. dr town hall meeting...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Presented by Patti Harper-Slaboszewicz UtiliPoint International, Inc. DR Town Hall Meeting Washington DC June 3, 2008 Research Results for U.S. Regulators](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082700/55147dc3550346b0158b5667/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Presented by
Patti Harper-Slaboszewicz
UtiliPoint International, Inc.
DR Town Hall Meeting
Washington DC
June 3, 2008
Research Results for U.S. Regulators
![Page 2: Presented by Patti Harper-Slaboszewicz UtiliPoint International, Inc. DR Town Hall Meeting Washington DC June 3, 2008 Research Results for U.S. Regulators](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082700/55147dc3550346b0158b5667/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2 © Copyright 2006 UtiliPoint® International, Inc.
All rights reserved. Confidential and Proprietary
Regulator support for time-based rates
Likelihood of regulator supporting residential programs
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
(blank) Not likelyat all
Not toolikely
Somewhatlikely
Likely Very likely
Time-based rates Direct LC Both
25 states reporting
![Page 3: Presented by Patti Harper-Slaboszewicz UtiliPoint International, Inc. DR Town Hall Meeting Washington DC June 3, 2008 Research Results for U.S. Regulators](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082700/55147dc3550346b0158b5667/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3 © Copyright 2006 UtiliPoint® International, Inc.
All rights reserved. Confidential and Proprietary
How does this compare to 2004?
Support grew for most time-based rates except for hourly.
This is most likely due to the difficulty of getting anywhere close to revenue neutrality with other rate options as hourly prices continue to increase.
U.S. Regulator support for time-based rates for residential customers
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
TOU CPP CPR Hourly
2007 2004
![Page 4: Presented by Patti Harper-Slaboszewicz UtiliPoint International, Inc. DR Town Hall Meeting Washington DC June 3, 2008 Research Results for U.S. Regulators](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082700/55147dc3550346b0158b5667/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4 © Copyright 2006 UtiliPoint® International, Inc.
All rights reserved. Confidential and Proprietary
How will residential customer participation be managed for these rates?Comments from regulators:
In the initial stages customer acceptance is key, so opt-in may be preferable. The day will come where opt-out is preferable, and likely no option will be offered. It will be mandatory to be on cost sensitive rates.
Comments from regulators: “We would consider issues related to cost of recruitment, customer acceptance, consumer education, and whether there should be a progression from less to more complex rate designs.”
Time- and usage-based pricing will only work if there is neither a consumer opt-in nor an opt-out mechanism. Instead, consumers need to be migrated to a real-time pricing system on a mandatory basis for it to work.
![Page 5: Presented by Patti Harper-Slaboszewicz UtiliPoint International, Inc. DR Town Hall Meeting Washington DC June 3, 2008 Research Results for U.S. Regulators](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082700/55147dc3550346b0158b5667/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5 © Copyright 2006 UtiliPoint® International, Inc.
All rights reserved. Confidential and Proprietary
Opt-in still the preferred method today
How will residential customer participation on CPP rates be managed?
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Opt-in
Opt-out
(blank)
![Page 6: Presented by Patti Harper-Slaboszewicz UtiliPoint International, Inc. DR Town Hall Meeting Washington DC June 3, 2008 Research Results for U.S. Regulators](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082700/55147dc3550346b0158b5667/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6 © Copyright 2006 UtiliPoint® International, Inc.
All rights reserved. Confidential and Proprietary
Inclusion in Rate Base
U.S. Regulatory view towards:Include some or all AMI costs in rate base
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35%
1
2
3 - Somewhat likely
4
5 - Very likely
(blank)
80%
Regulators appear to be inclined to include the cost of AMI in the rate base.
![Page 7: Presented by Patti Harper-Slaboszewicz UtiliPoint International, Inc. DR Town Hall Meeting Washington DC June 3, 2008 Research Results for U.S. Regulators](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082700/55147dc3550346b0158b5667/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7 © Copyright 2006 UtiliPoint® International, Inc.
All rights reserved. Confidential and Proprietary
How will regulators manage the change?Need for smart metering is clear
Time based ratesDistributed generation
How will revenue be collected from customers?
This is where I don’t envy regulatorsThe revenue has to be collected but there is no painless method for colleting the costs to support smart metering
Demand response is necessary – we can’t continue with average pricing when the cost differentials are increasing from season-to-season between high and low wholesale prices.
![Page 8: Presented by Patti Harper-Slaboszewicz UtiliPoint International, Inc. DR Town Hall Meeting Washington DC June 3, 2008 Research Results for U.S. Regulators](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082700/55147dc3550346b0158b5667/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8 © Copyright 2006 UtiliPoint® International, Inc.
All rights reserved. Confidential and Proprietary
Increase monthly customer charge?
U.S. Regulatory view towards:Increase monthly customer charge to cover costs
of AMI
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%
1
2
3 - Somewhat likely
4
5 - Very likely
(blank)
68%
Regulators appear to be look to the customer charge to cover the cost of AMI, but less so than their willingness to include in the rate base.
Late 2007 U.S. regulator survey
![Page 9: Presented by Patti Harper-Slaboszewicz UtiliPoint International, Inc. DR Town Hall Meeting Washington DC June 3, 2008 Research Results for U.S. Regulators](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082700/55147dc3550346b0158b5667/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9 © Copyright 2006 UtiliPoint® International, Inc.
All rights reserved. Confidential and Proprietary
Decouple distribution revenue from total usage?
U.S. Regulatory view towards:Decoupling distribution revenue from total usage
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%
1
2
3 - Somewhat likely
4
5 - Very likely
(blank)
52%
Not as much enthusiasm for this option – still over 50% but only 28 percent ranked it at 4 or 5.
Late 2007 U.S. regulator survey
![Page 10: Presented by Patti Harper-Slaboszewicz UtiliPoint International, Inc. DR Town Hall Meeting Washington DC June 3, 2008 Research Results for U.S. Regulators](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082700/55147dc3550346b0158b5667/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
© Copyright 2006 UtiliPoint® International, Inc.All rights reserved. Confidential and Proprietary
Establish separate rate for low-income customers?
U.S. Regulatory view towards:Increase monthly customer charge to cover costs
of AMI
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%
1
2
3 - Somewhat likely
4
5 - Very likely
(blank)
36%
Hardly any enthusiasm for this option – perhaps regulators are worried that if the trends continue, all Americans will be low-income…
Late 2007 U.S. regulator survey
![Page 11: Presented by Patti Harper-Slaboszewicz UtiliPoint International, Inc. DR Town Hall Meeting Washington DC June 3, 2008 Research Results for U.S. Regulators](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082700/55147dc3550346b0158b5667/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
© Copyright 2006 UtiliPoint® International, Inc.All rights reserved. Confidential and Proprietary
Contacts and Questions
Patti Harper-Slaboszewicz(505) 797-5475 or (505) 934-6896email: [email protected]
www.amimdm.comwww.utilipoint.com