presentation beijing zx 020709

37
© GLOBALGAP Secretariat, Page 1 GLOBALGAP 全球良好农业规范 Zhou Xin [email protected] Beijing, 2 July 2009

Upload: sri-china

Post on 26-Jun-2015

965 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

© GLOBALGAP Secretariat, Page 1

GLOBALGAP全球良好农业规范

Zhou [email protected], 2 July 2009

© GLOBALGAP Secretariat, Page 2

• GLOBALGAP Introduction• Benefits of GLOBALGAP• GLOBALGAP Certification• Approaches for small-scale farmers• Successful story• GLOBALGAP Tour2009

CONTENTS

© GLOBALGAP Secretariat, Page 3

• Private standard, led by the industry (producersand food service sector)

• Democratic participation along the food chain

• Global application (>90 countries)

• Voluntary participation by producers

WHAT IS GLOBALGAP?

© GLOBALGAP Secretariat, Page 4

• Sets standards for the certification of primaryproduction

• Communicates and supports theimplementation and application

• Provides framework for 3rd party certification offarm production processes

WHAT IS GLOBALGAP?

© GLOBALGAP Secretariat, Page 5

GOVERNANCE

© GLOBALGAP Secretariat, Page 6

INTEGRATED FARM ASSURANCE

© GLOBALGAP Secretariat, Page 7

RETAIL MEMBERS

© GLOBALGAP Secretariat, Page 8

SUPPLIER MEMBERS

© GLOBALGAP Secretariat, Page 9

ASSOCIATE MEMBERS

© GLOBALGAP Secretariat, Page 10

• Harmonisation of G.A.P. requirements of different

retailers; i.e. reducing duplication.

• Development of a protocol for producers globally

• Reducing cost of compliance

OBJECTIVES

© GLOBALGAP Secretariat, Page 11

KEY PRINCIPLES

• Open communication and consultation withinterested parties (such as SC, NTWG´s, etc)

• Integrity of the Certification process(requirement of ISO 65 accreditation for CBs)

• Open access to producers (Voluntary and nodiscrimination)

• Integrity Programme (IPRO)

© GLOBALGAP Secretariat, Page 12

Czech RepublicSept. 2006

SpainMay 2002

FranceJun 2002

ItalyJuly 2002

BelgiumFeb 2002

NetherlandsJan 2002

MalaysiaFeb 2003

ArgentinaMar 2004

GreeceSep 2004

BrazilFV: Jun 2004

LS: 2004

GermanyMay 2005

Colombia FV: Dec 2006

Aqua: Jul 2008

PolandDec. 2006

TurkeyApril2005

DenmarkJun 2007

ThailandSep 2007

BulgariaJuly 2006

UruguayMay 2008

IndiaMay 2008

UkraineSept. 2006

ChileJun 2008

NATIONAL TECHNICALWORKING GROUPS

SouthArica

Dec 2008

© GLOBALGAP Secretariat, Page 13

© GLOBALGAP Secretariat, Page 14

THE STANDARD

Food Safety

Environment

Worker Health

Safety & Welfa

re

Welfare

Major Musts

Minor Musts

Recommendations

100%

95%

0 %

© GLOBALGAP Secretariat, Page 15

• Contributes to sustainable agriculture on a globalscale

• Focus “4 in 1” (Food Safety, Social, Environment,Animal welfare)

• Improves the management systems of theproducers

• Adds value to the product

BENEFITS OF GLOBALGAP

© GLOBALGAP Secretariat, Page 16

• Global certification system (Recognized andTransparent)

• Integrity Programme (IPRO)

• Assist in market access for both small and largeproducers

• Harmonise the buyers’ requirements

BENEFITS OF GLOBALGAP

© GLOBALGAP Secretariat, Page 17

GLOBALGAP CERTIFICATION

© GLOBALGAP Secretariat, Page 18

• Certification Rules (options, audits,registration)

• Certification Body Requirements

• Auditor Qualifications.

• Rights and Obligations (Producers, CBs,Standard Owner)

Normative Documents

Structure

General Regulations(Certification System)

© GLOBALGAP Secretariat, Page 19

• MAJOR MUSTS (MM) 100%

• MINOR MUSTS (mm) 95%*

• RECOMENDATIONS (R) 0%

Normative Documents

Structure and Compliance

Control Points and Compliance Criteria (Standards)

© GLOBALGAP Secretariat, Page 20

OPTION 1OPTION 1

Individual CertificationIndividual Certification

GLOBALGAPGLOBALGAP

OPTION 3OPTION 3

Individual CertificationIndividual Certification

Benchmarked StandardBenchmarked Standard

OPTION 2OPTION 2

Group CertificationGroup Certification

GLOBALGAPGLOBALGAP

OPTION 4OPTION 4

Group CertificationGroup Certification

Benchmarked StandardBenchmarked Standard

Certification

© GLOBALGAP Secretariat, Page 21

• Producer Self Assessment on all CPCCsrequired before the CB audit

• CB carries out an external inspection for allCPCCs compliance.

• CB audit the results of the inspection anddecides if a GLOBALGAP certificate can begranted to the farmer.

Option 1/3

Individual Certification

Option 1/3: Individual Certification

© GLOBALGAP Secretariat, Page 22

Option 1/3: Individual Certification

SelfAssessment

Individual Certification

Producer

CB

External

Audit

ExternalInspection

© GLOBALGAP Secretariat, Page 23

• Producer Group (PG) is a legal entity that manages a QMScontaining GLOBALGAP requirements and distributed to it‘smembers.

• PG carry out 1 annual internal inspection to each of producermembers.

• PG carry out and internal audit of its QMS.• CB carries out an external audit of the PG’s QMS• CB inspects a sample of farmer members (minimum square

root)• CB audit the results of the inspections and QMS audit and

decides if a GLOBALGAP certificate can be granted to thePG.

Option 2/4

Group Certification

Option 2/4: Group Certification

© GLOBALGAP Secretariat, Page 24

QMSQMS

INTERNAL AUDIT

Option 2/4: Group Certification

INTERNAL GROUP INSPECTIONS

Group Certification

CB

External

Audit

External

Inspection

Producer Group

© GLOBALGAP Secretariat, Page 25

CertificateCertificate

Option 2/4: Group Certification

Group Transparency

CB

Producer Group

Registration

ProducersRegistration

CERTIFIED PRODUCTSProducer Group

© GLOBALGAP Secretariat, Page 26

CERTIFICATIONCertified producers (Options 1 and 2)

© GLOBALGAP Secretariat, Page 27

GLOBALGAP has implemented thefollowing three approaches to facilitatemarket access for small-scale farmers:

1. Group certification2. Smallholder manual3. Feedback opportunities

Approaches

© GLOBALGAP Secretariat, Page 28

Ambassador for Smallholdersin Developing Countries

© GLOBALGAP Secretariat, Page 29

Successful Story

1. The issue2. The initiative3. The process4. The impact5. The results

© GLOBALGAP Secretariat, Page 30

Successful Story

THE ISSUEThe increased consumer awareness in food safetyissues and their impact on our health and theenvironment has increased worldwide qualitystandards. Yet many food products come from smallfarming communities in developing countries.

Smallholder farmers in countries such as Thailandface difficulties in fulfilling the necessary requirementsthat would allow them access to higher-valuemarkets, such as in Europe or Japan. At less thanone hectare, most farms in Thailand are very small,which is why it is financially and structurally difficult forthem to implement standards and gain certification.

© GLOBALGAP Secretariat, Page 31

Successful Story

THE INITIATIVEThe Thai Chamber of Commerce and the publicenterprise GTZ are working to develop theGLOBALGAP GTZ Option 2 Project. It is now becomingpossible for these small farms to also achievecertification as member of a farmer group. This enablesthem to reduce certification costs and develop qualitymanagement systems, which are practical to manage,but still comply with the standards.The main objectives of the project are to open upmarket access for the smallholders, develop a simplesmallholder manual for groups and improveconsultation and training.

© GLOBALGAP Secretariat, Page 32

Successful Story

THE PROCESSFour Option 2 farmer groups including 70 farmers witha total area of 160 hectares have already beenformed. The groups are trained in quality managementand audit inspections, harvesting and producehandling, pesticide and fertiliser requirements, storagefacilities, standard requirements and environmentalissues.

The aim is for all of the four groups and 70 farmers tobe certified at the end of the project. The associationsinvolved hope to continue the project in the future tomake it possible for as many Thai farmers as possibleto take part.

© GLOBALGAP Secretariat, Page 33

Successful Story

THE IMPACTThe GLOBALGAP certification option for small-holderfarmers is improving their ability to comply withinternational requirements. Furthermore, it is openingup new markets and allowing them to participate inexciting export opportunities and increase theirprofits.

Agricultural products such as coconuts, mangos,lychees and dragon fruits can now be exportednationally and worldwide by the certified groupfarmers in Thailand. This conforms with the qualitycriteria for Good Agricultural Practices (G.A.P.).

© GLOBALGAP Secretariat, Page 34

Successful Story

THE RESULTS

•The grouping of farmers overcomes structuralbarriers•Local public sector support facilitates smallholdermarket access•A global standard is the driver for implementationof G.A.P.

© GLOBALGAP Secretariat, Page 35

© GLOBALGAP Secretariat, Page 36

GLOBALGAP will have a stallholder workshop tocollect views and concerns in Kuala Lumpur

Your opportunity to learn about latest developments ofGLOBALGAP and have an input into the Standard!

Nairobi – Kenya................. 15th September 2009Montevideo – Uruguay..... 24th/25th September 2009Kuala Lumpur – Malaysia.. 14th/15th October 2009Washington, DC – USA...... 29th October 2009Athens – Greece................ 11th/12th November 2009

More Information on Programme, Fees and Detailsfor Registration are available on

www.tour2009.org!

GLOBALGAP Tour 2009

© GLOBALGAP Secretariat, Page 37

THANK YOU!

Pho

tos:

SX

C/H

enks

ter;

SX

C/M

ills